More on Der Movement's White-Knighting

Part of the moral panic.

Another breathless White-knighting Counter-Currents article says:

This leads us to the current issue with the online abuse of Alt Right women. Yes, the victims are all women, but what’s more, they are attractive women, especially McCarthy and Southern. This, I believe, is the main reason why their male followers place unreasonable demands upon them, demands that they would not place on their male counterparts. This also explains why the emotional responses to their foibles or past indiscretions have been so heated and cruel. Through no fault of their own, these women have the tendency to make young, insecure men feel mean.

Maybe the mudshark Southern is attractive.  But McCarthy?  Are you serious?  These are omega male standards.  And guess what, not everyone criticizing them is “young” or “insecure.”  The current crop of Counter-Currents writers are at a low level of quality.  It’s truly embarrassing.

A good comment:

This wasnt attack on women in alt-right. This was attack against coalburning camwhore Southern who is not alt-right and only exploiting right wing men and Tara who came in her defense for no reason whatsoever and used feminist talking points to defend her.

I am sad to see counter-currents decided to publish this feminist article and I am deeply troubled by the collectivist response by women in alt-right. They closed ranks as if they personally were attacked. This kind of attack is something that would never work with men. I was never against women in alt-right, there is small minority of women who are capable, but this response has had me thinking.

Johnson’s telling Freudian slip (emphasis added to the original 12/13/17 version [in case it’s changed]):

When someone is attacking you with a knife, you are a fool to wonder if maybe he has a point to make. He’s trying to harm you. You need to stop him, not debate him. Once I glimpse malice and dishonesty in a person, I shit from debating to shutting him down.

Yeah, Greg, that’s exactly what you’re doing to the debate.

What I see as a problem in Counter-Currents' latest hysteria in defense of ditzy females is that it is taking place in the context of the current "sexual harassment moral panic" that is burning down American society.  It seems to me there's a connection here, the same type of "women are always right, XX chromosomes uber alles" mentality.  It may be true that the "trolling" was "over-the-top" but there have been reasonable comments on Counter-Currents from a pro-male position (see above), and we see the response: "shit from debating."  Indeed.