Three Times Sallis Has Been Wrong

Three errors of judgment.

I criticize the quota queens for never admitting when they are (constantly) wrong, and long time readers of this blog know that, in contrast, I openly admit when I am (very rarely) wrong.

For newer readers, I will now openly admit three examples of Sallisian error.

1. I was wrong about Trump’s election; I freely admit that I paid too much attention to Establishment opinion polling and “spin.” Mea culpa.

2. I was also wrong in thinking that Der Movement could be a vehicle for pursuing White racial interests: I was proven very wrong in this, as discussed in my “After Twenty Years” post.  In my defense, I had realized that the “movement” had serious problems as far back as around the year 2000 (or even earlier),and the Legion Europa project of the early 2000s was an attempt to offer an alternative, but that failed.  I was foolish in retrospect, however, to think that, after this failure, Der Movement could be reformed from within.  It is beyond redemption.

3. I was wrong as well to believe that various “movement” “isms” could be compatible, so that ethnonationalists and Nordicists could also be, at the same time, pan-European, with a nested set of interests – focusing primarily on their more narrow ingroup if they so chose, but still showing interest in, and solidarity with, the broader European population.  Subsequent history has proven me to be in error.  This was a mistake on my part, an error in judgment.

In my defense with respect to this, in theory it is possible for ethnonationalists and Nordicists to also be pan-European, if they are rational in their “isms” and view relatedness in a concentric manner.

But that’s theory.  In reality, in the real world, with irrational people, with fetishists and their dogma, it is practically not possible.  If I was less naive, I would have realized that, so that is another black mark against my judgment.

Now, if you believe that these errors of judgment disqualify me as a dependable commentator, that is certainly your right, but you must then also admit that:

A. I, unlike Der Movement’s “leadership,” am at least able to admit when I’m wrong.

B. If my rare errors are disqualifying, then the quota queens' constant errors must be an order of magnitude more disqualifying, unless of course they have affirmative action protections in this regard.

Fundamental difference: the rare times I am wrong, I openly admit it; the endless times Der Movement is wrong, its "activists" and "leaders" won't admit it, not one single time.