Does Z Stand for Zany?

More “movement” and leftist stupidity. In all cases, emphasis added.

Zman, the slavishly pro-Jewish “race realist” promoted by Greg Johnson:

thezman

Libertarians respond to skeptics by assuming the skeptic has just not read the right libertarian tome or heard the speech on the NAP enough times. They never consider the possibility that the skeptic has reviewed all the material and come to a different conclusion. Anti-Semites suffer from a similar defect. You guys always assume the reason people don’t rally to your banner is that they have been enchanted so that they cannot see what you see. So, you just keep repeating the same abracadabra phrases. 

I know all your arguments, better than you most likely. I choose to live my life as I see fit.

And yet, Johnson’s views are what Zman would consider to be that of an “Anti-Semite.”  Der Movement is certainly a majestic monument to imponderable inconsistency.

More Zman:

This is exactly what happened with the Tea Party. What started out as an authentic white middle-class revolt was quickly hijacked by charlatans. In fact, the grifters arrived so quickly it looked like the Normandy invasion. These types of people operate in the same way English pirates operated in the age of sail. That is, the people in charge give them a free pass, as long as they meddle in the affairs of dissidents. The Right has never figured out how to defend itself from this attack or even tried to understand it.

Sounds a lot like racial activism, taken over by the quota queen grifters with their endless failure and tin cup panhandling.  Charlatans?  Hey, Zman, is that projection?

Finally, the thing that got many paleos in trouble is they could never figure out how to keep the lunatics out of their thing. I’m talking about the people who cannot control themselves and say nutty things in public. The Buckelyites just purged anyone they saw as bad for their racket. In fact, it is what defines them. Paleos hated this about the Buckleyites and the neocons, but they never found an alternative. As a result, they were often put in the position of defending people who maybe should have been reprimanded instead.

You mean, like lunatics who rant about Savitri Devi and The Men Who Can’t Tell Time?

The alt-right is a good recent example of this. What started as an edgy internet movement was plagued by old school nutters from the white nationalist subculture, as well as by loons who simply lack self-control. As a result, they became defined by guys like Chris Cantwell…

OK, let’s consider Cantwell – someone I never heard about until the Alt Righters attempted their coup of Der Movement.

…Cantwell described himself as a men's rights activist but also an anti-racist anarcho-capitalist. He spent much of his early-to-mid 30s as a libertarian: running for office and engaged in practical activism. A 2014 episode of the Colbert Report chronicled his daily life harassing meter maids, which Cantwell justified by appeal to the non-aggression principle of anarcho-capitalism. Colbert also documented Cantwell's harangues against veterans, whom he accused of racism for "killing Arabs."

I’m calling you out “Zman” – you despicable, dishonest, dishonorable, Philo-Semite.  Oh yes, someone coming from a background of anti-racist “anarcho-capitalism” and libertarianism is an “old school nutter” from the “white nationalist subculture.”  Right?  No, he’s another Beavis-and-Butthead ex-libertard Alt Righter, an archetypal WN 2.0er. 

Or do you consider Cantwell as simply a "loon" who "lacks self-control?"  If so, you are again despicably dishonest because that description characterizes almost the entire Alt Right crowd.  Who was it who brought us Unite the Right?  Who brought us cosplay costumes out in the street?  Who brought us drunken podcasting, dumb sniggering, and memes about a cartoon frog and something called Kek?

….instead of people like Mike Enoch

You mean this guy?

Michael Peinovich (born 1977),[1] commonly known by his pseudonym Mike Enoch, is an American white nationalist[1] and Neo-Nazi[2][3] blogger and podcast host. He founded the alt-right media hub The Right Stuff and podcast The Daily Shoah. Enoch is also a promoter of conspiracy theories such as Holocaust denial.

At this point, the only question is whether “Zman” is simply a sincere idiot or a destructive infiltrator.

And all of this ultimately comes from Gaslighting Greg: Johnson’s reality-inverting claim that the good and great WN 2.0 was ruined by WN 1.0, while, if anything, the opposite was the case.  I mean, yes, WN 1.0 had already ruined itself, but then WN 2.0 came along to put a final nail in the coffin, by overlaying the stupid dogma of 1.0 with the juvenile jackassery of 2.0.

Solving the conundrum: Lennon is actually S. Italian.

Putting aside the typical leftist anti-nuclear whining, I found the following remarkable:

I must confess that, as a physics professor, some of my nightmares are extra geeky. My worst one is the C-bomb, a hydrogen bomb surrounded by large amounts of cobalt. When I first heard about this doomsday device in Stanley Kubrik’s dark nuclear satire Dr. Strangelove, I wasn’t sure if it was physically possible.

Err…I knew that a cobalt bomb was “physically possible” even as a child; for godssakes, essentially all you need to do is replace the U238 tamper of a thermonuclear device with one made of cobalt; that would approximately halve the yield, but all the high energy neutrons from the secondary would go to making the radioactive isotope form of cobalt.  What about that is not “physically possible?”  And this is from a “physics professor?” I do hope he had his retard moment before becoming a physicist (even then it would be disturbing); if it were after then that would be truly frightening.  Are all these virtue signaling “cognitive elitist” moral posturers so incredibly ignorant?

Is "Tegmark” – whose original name was “Shapiro” – a “Swedish” Jew?  Sure seems like it.  They don't make cognitive elitists like they used to!

An effeminate pussy pedestalizer.

Oh, I remember this.  I also remember all the screeching females and their moaning about how personal hygiene – like shaving hairy yeastbucket armpits and legs – was some sort of misogynistic plot from “the patriarchy” to “hold down women.”  After all, it’s not like the vast majority of men worldwide shave their faces every day or anything like that, right?

What’s that about women having “agency,” Greg?