Mr. Olympia: Form vs. Function

The 2019 Mr. Olympia. 

Negroes at the top, with a NEC Iranian in the mix.  But, definitely, for bodybuilding, a long-standing Negro domination.

Has anyone else noticed racial stratification in “muscle and fitness” sports?  When it comes to strength and power, Whites dominate.  Northern Europeans – particularly physically huge, big-boned, Borreby types – dominate Strongman.  Weightlifting and powerlifting are also heavily White; Bulgarians are heavily over-represented in weightlifting success, while a broad spectrum of European types (including wops) do well in powerlifting. On the other hand, particularly over the last few decades, bodybuilding has been heavily dominated by Negroes, both relatively pure Negroes as well as mulattoes. So, functionality of muscularity = White; superficial appearance of muscularity = Negro. This is analogous to the observation by HBDers that Negroes can sometimes appear to be cognitively and technically competent via extroversion and charismatic confidence, but in reality it is the quiet White beta male who is competent and the Negro most definitely is not.  Function vs. the appearance of function.

But then, there are people on the Far Right who prefer form over function, eh?  The prop is very esthetic, indeed!

This is, frankly, a bit ludicrous:

The five stewardesses on an Eastern Airlines flight I took to Miami in 1974 looked like they could all be finalists in the Miss America pageant. Even though we hit a large air pocket I still remember it as one of the most enjoyable flights I ever took. The opening staff of the Norwegian Pavilion at Epcot in May 1988 provided a similarly memorable enjoyable experience. When I took my first trip to Scandinavia the following summer the experience was frequently repeated. I remember a bus tour of Copenhagen with a group of mostly retired Americans getting their first impression of Scandinavia, and everyone remarking about how good looking and blond the people were. I assumed they had expected a high level of blondness, but what they actually saw obviously exceeded their expectations.

Promoting public policy based on personal anecdotes.  By golly, a flight I took to Miami 45 years ago hit a large air pocket, but those five (not four, not six, but five, count ‘em, five) stewardesses made the flight ever so enjoyable!

And, of course, the requisite obsession with Scandinavia.

I’d like to point out that this obsession was leveraged by HopeNotHate in orchestrating their Hermansson infiltration.  That is not conjecture, not a matter of debate, but established fact. Hermansson himself described in detail how his ancestry was a key factor – perhaps the key factor – in enabling his easy and complete access to the higher circles of “movement leadership,” and how Steadman’s well-known fetishes in this regard made him a viable target.

Racial esthetics are important, no doubt. But everything needs to be put in their proper place, and individuals should not project their particular preferences into an overwhelming obsession to define the totality of racial nationalism.