Francis Parker Yockey Died for YOUR Sins

I accuse!

Those of us involved in “this thing of ours” for a long time may remember the Euro-American Student Union (ESU) of the mid-late 1990s to the early 2000s, an essentially Yockeyian organization that had, at that time, great promise.  I remember their website had a feature about the “Holy Trinity” - analogous to that of Catholicism – of their group, consisting of Spengler (The Father), Yockey (The Son), and Nietzsche (The Holy Spirit).  

I was able to find those essays on The Wayback Machine. I always found the Yockey essay – linked here – that was written by “Ursus Major,” to be the best of the three (albeit of course I do not agree with everything in it).

In Christianity, it is said that Jesus died to redeem the sins of humanity.  Since Yockey is “The Son” in the ESU Trilogy, it is not surprising that the Yockey essay claims that, as the essay’s title states:

Francis Parker Yockey Died for YOUR Sins!   

So, who does Ursus Major claim to be morally responsibility for Yockey’s death?  For whose sins did Yockey die for?  The answer given in the essay - the moronic, cowardly, and feckless individuals who went to the ESU site, ending up doing nothing to promote the work of the ESU, doing nothing to fight for our Race-Culture, and asking Ursus Major for help with their college courses.

The crucial excerpt from the essay:

Who "crucified" Francis Parker Yockey? YOU DID! (Whaaa?) That's right: all 200,000 of you, who've come trotting to the ESU web site and done nothing! You, who send me imbecilic e-mail asking me to explain the poetry of Ezra Pound, because you're taking a course in "Modern Lit" ("literature" has too many letters; "lit" will do) and need an "A" for the Passport! Yes, YOU! Popping your zits and wondering if you're going to get laid this weekend ... but do anything for your Race-Culture? Oh, no ... that's too much to ask! Homo bovinus americanus: ruled by gut and groin; you'll find your portrait sketched over a century ago, in Zarathustra's Prologue - one herd and no shepherd!

You get the point. Now, approximately twenty years later, I would like to extend Ursus Major’s Yockey essay to the “movement” of today.  What other sins did Francis Parker Yockey die for? Consider the HBD-Nordicist-Ethnonationalist alliance that currently dominates the “movement.”  All three of those pillars of the “movement” are entities that represent ideas that Yockey opposed and despised; all three are anathema to a Yockeyian worldview.  We know that the radically pan-European Yockey vehemently opposed the divisive “zoological” “vertical race” ideas of Nordicism; we know he loathed and opposed the divisive ethnonationalists, the petty nationalists who he considered traitors to the West, culture retarders who were doing the work of the enemy; no doubt Yockey would loathe and oppose HBD as a “materialist zoological” form of 19th century-style culture retardation, dividing Europeans based on IQ and “Hajnal lines.” One could only imagine what Yockey would think about an ideology such as HBD “race realism” that self-describes as “yellow supremacy” and that privileges Jews and Orientals over Whites. Further, one can only imagine what Yockey would think of an affirmative action program for nationalist leadership, based upon the same “vertical race” ideas that he constantly condemned.  Even further, we can further imagine the views of Yockey, a cultured man with the talent of classical pianist, about the “Beavis-and-Butthead” Alt-Right, Pepe, MAGA, and “activism” that consists of screaming “Kek!” while chugging gallons of milk. Yockey would be shocked and sickened by the travesty that the "movement" has become.  

At this point I anticipate and refute accusations of hypocrisy – that the “materialist scientific” worldview of Sallis, including “zoological EGI,” would also be opposed by Yockey. I have always made clear that I do not agree with Yockey on everything, and it is true that I am a proponent of a truly scientific and objective “empiricist materialism.”  But, let us be honest here and acknowledge the difference between fundamental and peripheral aspects of a worldview. The fundamental foundation of Yockeyism is pan-Europeanism, it is the Unity of the West, and it is the Idea of Imperium. Yockey’s views on, say, Darwinism, although strongly held, were at most peripheral, and essentially inconsequential, to the main thrust of his ideas. Nordicism, Ethnonationalism, and HBD are directly antagonistic to the core fundamental foundation of Yockeyism, they strike at the very heart of pan-Europeanism, they are incompatible with the Unity of the West, and they are anathema to Imperium. On the other hand, not only is science, particularly EGI, not antagonistic to the core ideals of Yockeyism, but, as explained here, it can be complimentary to, and strongly supportive of, Yockeyism.

Thus, there is no hypocrisy here; everything stands together as an integrated whole.  Der Movement and its three pillars of Nordicism, Ethnonationalism, and HBD are anathema to everything Yockey stood for, while the empiricist and materialist elements of the Sallis Groupuscule are fully compatible with the broad outlines of the Yockeyian Ideal, even if Yockey would have perhaps quibbled over the peripheral details. Always keep in mind that Yockey’s views on issues were always colored by how those issues affected his Imperium idea, and of the overarching ideal of The Unity of the West. It may well be that a 2020 Yockey, better informed about EGI and real racial science, would be less critical of EGI-type “zoological materialism” than he was of the Guntherite Nordicism of his day. Certainly, a call to preserve the ethnic genetic interests of Europeans is compatible with Imperium, and, since Yockey was supportive of local sovereignty, and of the preservation of local national and cultural uniqueness, within the Imperium, he most likely would not have had a problem with preservation of intra-European EGI, so long as that was presented in a “horizontal” rather than hierarchical and supremacist “vertical” fashion. 

Indeed, keep in mind that the Sallis Groupuscule considers Identity in an integrated fashion, which, while biological-genetic considerations are the foundation, includes other elements such as culture, civilization, history, the processes of indigenous ethnogenesis, etc. Yockey also viewed Identity in an integrated fashion. In Imperium, Yockey referred to Race, People, Nation, State, Culture, and he specifically referred to the Jews as the Jewish Church-State-Nation-People-Race. Thus, “Race” is an important component of Identity, but not the only one. This is fully consistent with the view of the Sallis Groupuscule, the major difference is that I use a more genetic and biological definition of “Race” as compared to what Yockey wrote in the days before it was discovered that DNA is the stuff of genetic heredity. The details are different, but the overall idea is the same - biological Race is a necessary but not sufficient component of Identity. Thus, Identity is a synergistic idea, an emergent phenomenon, from a variety of inputs.

Now, that we have all of that clarified, I can state to the Nordicists, the Ethnonationalists, the HBDers, and to the Alt Right jackasses and Type I Nutzis of all types – Francis Parker Yockey died for YOUR sins.  You all are morally responsible for his death – the timing doesn’t matter, just as in Christianity, Jesus’ sacrifice redeems the sins of humanity past, present, and future, so did Yockey die for the sins of activists, including those sins occurring decades after his death.  Again, it is moral responsibility, not physical responsibility.

All of them, with their promotion of intra-European division, their promotion of fossilized dogma of the worst types of vertical race theories, the moronic antics that delegitimize the cause, all of them are morally responsible for the death of Francis Parker Yockey.  If you consider that their ideas and activities are for the most part completely opposite to that of what Yockey believed and fought for, they are not only morally responsible for Yockey’s death but they are also responsible for the death of Yockey’s ideals. It is bad enough that Yockey the man died, but these destructive types, these culture retarders, are killing Yockey’s belief system, they are killing Yockey the Ideal, Yockey the Cause, Yockey the Avatar of Imperium. I’m sure that Yockey would be more offended by the murder of his ideal, the murder of Imperium, than by his physical death.

YOU all, and your rank-and-file enablers, stand among the rank of enemies. In the end, is there that much of a difference between a HBD-Nordicist-Ethnonationalist and some blue-haired SJW fatty?

Francis Parker Yockey died for YOUR sins.