What Do the Flubros Want?

And other news.

Following up on this.

When you criticize something, you should always offer an alternative.  I criticize the System, and offer White nationalism (more generally: universal nationalism) as the alternative. I criticize Der Movement, and offer alternative approaches both at this blog and also at Western Destiny. So, with the criticism of the flubros to the mainstream response to covid-19, what is their alternative?

They oppose the vaccines. They oppose lockdowns. They oppose masking. In the absence of any alternative plan of action, it seems that they simply want us to ignore the virus and just go on as if it does not exist.  If people get sick, they get sick. If they get hospitalized, sometimes on respirators, then so be it. If they die, they die. If they get long-term physiological damage, well, so what?  And, worst of all, if the virus continues to spread, and continues to mutate, eventually becoming an extremely dangerous (to everyone), very contagious, and very deadly form, even by flubro standards, well, that’s a small price to pay so that the flubros can have the “freedom” to pack their churches without masks and praise Jaysus.

In contrast, I say that we should get as many people vaccinated – with the mRNA vaccines – as quickly as possible. Even if the vaccines do not directly suppress actual infection (this really needs to be determined), if viral loads in vaccinated infected persons are greatly reduced, and if this can reduce the transmission rate to under 1.0, then we have a chance of ending this pandemic. At the same time, we need more data on the overall efficacy (and side effects) of the vaccines, particularly with respect to actual infection and transmission, how long immunity lasts, and whether there is immunity to new viral strains. It may be necessary to have boosters or even a new, superior vaccine. But we need to get folks vaccinated now, with what we have now. Will there be some negative consequences of vaccination for some? Certainly, but there will be more negative consequences for letting the disease spread and doing nothing about it. If you are upset about this choice: BLAME CHINA.

Laugh at this.

When Johnson brags about the pro-HBD speakers all having PhDs, I note that his PhD is in philosophy, and Dutton’s is in religious studies. But they'll speak about biological and genetic science with "expertise." Oh, that criticism is…credentialism. Then why did Johnson engage in the credentialism of mentioning the PhDs to begin with?

LL: Did they handcuff you?

GJ: No, nothing like that. It was super casual and polite. It was what you’d expect in a Nordic social democracy — kind of laid back.

Hail Nordics!  But, then…

They seemed to have an unwritten rule, that no matter how simple your request is, they would count to one million — very slowly — before they would grant the request. It just took forever for the simplest things to happen.

What you’d expect in a Nordic social democracy?

Either they were in on it — they were part of the communist, Antifa, ultra-Left network in that country and doing a good deed for their comrades — or they were totally incompetent. Neither option is really a good look for the Norwegian Security Services. You want the intelligence apparatus in your country to be intelligent. You want the security service to actually make you more secure. You’re not secure if you have people who are dishonest, or just incompetent, making decisions like this.

What you’d expect in a Nordic social democracy?

LL: Why you? Why are you such a threat? 

GJ: That’s a good question. Why didn’t they target Kevin MacDonald? He was there too, and he’s a far more important person than I am. I don’t know why they targeted me, not him. They even found Kevin making comments about Breivik. They said, “Oh! He’s another Breivik supporter.” But they didn’t try to arrest and expel him. Maybe they think I’m going good work. 

“…Going good work.”  Going. Remember, proper spelling and word usage are for the Untermenschen; the Herrenvolk do as they please!  I suppose that the good and great LL and GJ meant “doing.” The implication is then that MacDonald is not doing (or “going”) good work?

Brad Griffin (emphasis added):

It is at the level of politics where Der Movement has miserably failed. The movement has failed to translate the “four truths” into a winning political message. The movement has failed for a variety reasons. Some of these reasons are internal. Some of these reasons are external. Internally, the biggest problem is the lack of an overarching strategy to advance our mutual goals and common interest, which has led to paralysis and frustrated people turning to the worst people who have the worst ideas and lashing out in pointless acts of violence. Externally, the cause of this is state repression and marginalization by the stigma on the Right that is attached to Whites who try to organize to advance their common interests. Were it not for the external repression and stigma, there would be significantly less of these violent fanatics.

Can we fix this problem?

I’ve already written about the violent fanatics. There is nothing we can do about state repression and disruption which isn’t in our power to control. We don’t know these people in real life and can’t predict their highly personal meltdowns. We can brainstorm new political strategies though. We can think outside the old box of mainstreaming vs. vanguardism neither of which has never worked.

I think this is the area where our intellectuals have failed us the most. It is fine that we have people who are hammering away at the core themes or truths. They are doing important work. We have all kinds of people though who are wandering around in highly esoteric subjects, distant centuries and foreign regimes and countries which have no relevance to the real world which is the United States in 2021 in the Joe Biden presidency. They’re not focused on the work which really needs to be done.

I essentially agree. But watch out, Brad.  Johnson may label you as "insane" and a "paranoid of crap" as he did with me. You see, you can't criticize the vaunted "leaders" of Der Movement.  After all, it may result in them getting less "D'Nations" and we can't have that!

See this. Of course that is true. In contrast to Johnson's gaslighting stupidity, I have always maintained that Trump won in 2016 in spite of, not because of, his obnoxious and vulgar personality - he won because of his policy positions. Johnsons moronic position - that apparently only he holds - that Trump could have won in 2016 with a Jeb Bush platform, and that people, including women and including evangelicals of both sexes, voted for Trump's pleasant, sparkling, "grab them by the pussy" personality is ludicrous. You see, Johnson cannot admit he was wrong about Trump, wrong about Trump as a "sincere man of genuine greatness," he cannot admit that Sallis was right when he labelled Trump a vulgar ignorant buffoon, a Negrophillic race cuck, and a fraud, before the election, so Johnson spews the most ridiculous nonsense to try and cover his abysmal lack of judgment. Leadership!  Enjoy! Send in the "D'Nations!"  Money, money, money!