Defending Salterism and Against Fetishism

Against "movement" nonsense.

This here might be the single most stupid thing I have ever read in my life:

It's all there - Nordicism and ethnic fetishism combined with NECism, a complete misunderstanding of Salter's work, thinking that HBDers speak the truth as opposed to being politically motivated hacks, and presenting overly complex (and poorly written) "explanations" of why Der Movement is a failure. All in all, exactly what one would expect from a site run by the King of Ethnic Fetishism.

As regards the work of Salter, I’ve explained it, extended it, and defended it many times, including:

Basic explanation.

See this.

And this.

And this.

And also this.

And this as well.

Yet more.

Ethics of EGI.

Self-sacrificial altruism.

And more.

And this.

Yet more.

More on altruism.

Indirect support from the literature.

And some more on ethics and pragmatism.

The fact that something as self-evidently true as genetic interests has to be constantly defended tells us much about the retardation of the Right, the mendacity of the Left, and the vileness of HBD. That people cannot distinguish descriptive from prescriptive arguments is frightening. That they think that Universal Nationalism and White Nationalism are somehow, by their natures, different things - and a person cannot promote both - is also frightening. That people can be so mendacious - or lazy - to ignore all of Salter's careful explanations and defenses is also high disturbing. That people take at absolute face value comments about self-sacrifice made to illustrate a theoretical point, and ignore Salter's clear statements that most defenses of EGI will involve more mundane (and less life-threatening) acts of ethnic nepotism, also demonstrates their mind-numbing mendacity or their absolute stupidity.

…white nationalists are happy to admit this. They tend to view racial identity as a kernel of biological kinship, surrounded by a protective shell of cultural commonalities. That is why they do not (in theory) want to disown the more racially-admixed parts of southern Europe, or embrace non-Western peoples who may be biologically related to whites.

EGI Notes has discussed, in great detail, population genetics, the racial histories of different parts of Europe, the lack of absolute “racial purity,” and the indisputable evidence of Asian admixture in Northern Europe, which fetishists like this sweaty obsessive always like to ignore.

Note that the same fetishist who emphasizes “the more racially-admixed parts of southern Europe” also promotes the idea of “embrace non-Western peoples who may be biologically related to whites.” Of course, even from a strictly Nordicist, Northern European-obsessed perspective, the former are more closely related to “Nordics” than the latter. That is shown by Fst or by more direct measures of genetic kinship or by PCA or whatever genetic assay method you wish to use. Therefore, to take the position of the author – implying that the “non-Western peoples” deserve to be embraced as much or more than the allegedly admixed peoples of “the more racially-admixed parts of southern Europe”- is reflective of the author’s obsessions and ethnic fetishism and ethnic animus. But for someone who thinks that HBD retards and leftist pseudoscientists have “refuted Salter” I suppose it makes sense to value the biologically more distant than those closer. After all, I’ve diagnosed Northern European xenophilia coupled to the narcissism of small differences as to why they prefer NECs and other non-Whites to non-Nordic Europeans – whether it’s Merkel or this author makes no difference. The maladaptive behavioral suite is the same.

And who denies the cultural and civilizational aspects of Identity?  The clearly synergize with the purely biological components. There's no argument there against either Salter's work or White nationalism in general.

As regards what is really wrong with Der Movement, well, that’s a major theme of this blog and any reader knows well my opinion.  Ironically, the author of that Affirmative Right piece, and the “ideas” contained therein, are actually part of the problem.