Odds and Ends, 7/10/20

In der news.

Considering the possible survey questions attempting to discern why Whites with views at least partially compatible with WN beliefs refuse to support pro-White activism in any way, I propose three major probable reasons:

1. Fear and/or selfishness. These people are (to some extent, justifiably) afraid of the personal consequences of involvement; further, they may care only about themselves and their families, for their personal survival. They may mish simply to “ride the tiger” instead of killing it. As long as they are given a few crumbs from the table, they won’t bother to do anything. They lack the motivation to overcome their perception of their self-interest and their comfort to actually do anything.

2. Lack of confidence in the “movement.” They perceive the Far Right as a bunch of extremist freaks, perhaps dangerous freaks, with zero probability of accomplishing anything. They don’t see that the benefits of assisting the Far Right outweighs the costs. They view the Far Right as a bunch of downwardly mobile, low class “badwhites.” and see nothing good from associating with them. If anything, these people will just support the GOP and think that’s enough. Many of these people voted for Trump in 2016, hoping for a top-down effortless quick fix. The more intelligent of them have now learned otherwise, but this revelation doesn’t lead them to the Far Right, which they despise or fear, and want nothing to do with them.  Even more “enlightened” Whites are conformist herd animals, desperately seeking social approval.

3. Despair and depression. They may believe that it is too late, the game is lost, Whites and the West are finished, so why do anything, why put themselves out, why sacrifice, why fight, why put themselves in any danger, for a lost cause?  If everyone pro-White is fearful, depressed, and atomized, they will never know how many people think likewise; they will always underestimate the numbers of others like them, further feeding into the fear and despair.

To combat these issues, the Far Right should:

Build infrastructures and support systems to lessen the costs of involvement and deal with the social pricing problem, focus on the more idealistic and less selfish people, wait for conditions to degenerate so that even some of the more selfish see they have no choice, the “movement” needs to clean up its own game and stop being freakish losers who repel people, they need to underscore the uselessness of mainstream Republicans but at the same time must get involved in electoral politics so as to give people choices and more importantly to normalize pro-White activism, democratic multiculturalism should be utilized as an approach, some victories – however small – must be achieved to lessen despair, and safe ways to get like-minded people in the same locale together must be developed.

But, more importantly – let’s get actual empirical survey data and go from there, instead of relying on theoretical assumptions such as what I present here.

Read this.  The Chinese “people” are waging a remorseless war of extermination against humanity.  Unfortunately, humanity refuses to protect itself. When will humans defend themselves against Chinese?

This is correct.

Never forget that the Alt Right/WN 2.0 was to a large extent a creation of ex-libertarians.

An early advocate of the Costello Counter-Currents carnivore diet (emphasis added):

Hornsby was not shy even as a 19-year-old getting his first taste of the big leagues, and after the season approached manager Huggins for his assessment. Huggins said, “Kid, you’re a little light, but you’ve got the makings. I think I’ll farm you out for a year.”

As hard as it is to believe, Hornsby completely mistook what Huggins meant and spent the winter on his uncle’s farm near Lockhart, Texas, doing farm labor, eating fried chicken and steak, and drinking as much milk as he could hold.[fn]Hornsby and Surface, 38; D’Amore, 11-12; Alexander, 26-27; Frederick G. Lieb, “Hornsby Badges — Blazing Bat, Sharp Tongue,” The Sporting News, January 19, 1963, 12.[/fn]

By the time he reported to the Cardinals’ 1916 springtraining base in Hot Wells, Texas, Hornsby had gained about 30 pounds of muscle…Hornsby’s personal habits and lifestyle were almost as exceptional as his prowess at baseball. He didn’t drink alcohol or use tobacco products but was a big red-meat eater, always with quantities of whole milk. He also had a particular fondness for ice cream, which he consumed every evening. 

And this diet resulted in top notch cardiovascular fitness later in life:

In the fall of 1962 Hornsby entered a Chicago hospital for cataract surgery and suffered a stroke. He was unable to leave the hospital during the holidays and on January 5, 1963, the Rajah suffered a fatal heart attack. He was 66 years old.

Read this.

Gay men are, by their own admission, notoriously catty. Milo says it well- he’s “never met a grudge he didn’t like.”

Oh, indeed, and that doesn’t only describe Milo, eh?

The deeper issue is how Milo has been rehabilitated by members of the self-described “dissident right.” The very same “Catholic” pundits expressing deep concerns about premarital sex are linking arms with a homosexual, gay-married Jew. Milo’s career was dead in mid-2019; even his alt-lite allies had left him behind. He had been relegated to posting sporadic YouTube skits and Telegram updates- and in just in that moment, Nick Fuentes and Patrick Casey swoop in to save him, beginning a now year-long effort to rehabilitate his image.

WN 2.0!  Everyone and anyone who has promoted WN 2.0,the Alt Right, and “the big tent” are complicit in all of this.

Big Tent WN 2.0!

Read this (emphasis added):

The U.S. Nationalist Party was a tiny, short-lived group formed in the early 1960s by Douglas Kaye and John Sullivan with help from Fred Weiss. Weiss had been the brains (along with H. Keith Thompson) of the National Renaissance Party with James H. Madole as the nominal front man. Weiss didn’t have all that much faith in Madole to carry forth the message of Francis Parker Yockey so he hedged his bets.

During the short time it existed, I managed to get only couple bulletins from the U.S. Nationalist Party. If I recall, much of their invective was aimed at George Lincoln Rockwell and his so-called ‘American Nazi Party’ whom they termed ‘nutzis.’ Weiss’s ally Thompson was a real SS man and also both contemptuous and suspicious of Rockwell. Rockwell, at best, was a just a conservative with a taste for Jew-baiting and wearing the swastika. Like Thompson, I think Rockwell was worse. Rockwell supported U.S. foreign policy which included the continued occupation of Europe. That,in turn, would lead to the de-industrialization of Europe and the mass Third World immigration.

Rockwell hated Yockey so a U.S. Nationalist Party, which supported Yockey was needed. But the times were too early.

To keep pure Yockeyism alive, Kaye and Sullivan started a new publication called TRUD!: FROM THE WHITE UNDERGROUND. Many regarded “TRUD!” as a play on words of “Trud”, the Soviet trade union paper.

Sullivan wrote me and said TRUD! stood for Terror Removes Unwanted Democracy.

Because TRUD! was very Yockeyist in its pro-Russian stand–something Yockey’s ‘official’ American promoter, W.A. Carto, avoided like the plague–many, at first glance, thought it was a run-of-the-mill radical or New Leftist sheet, common at the time.

But in a 1969 letter to subscribers, Kaye and Sullivan wrote this:

“TRUD! Listen to that word! Listen to the sound of TRUD! It’s the sound of a police club crushing the skull of a ghetto rioter or student anarchist. TRUD! the sound of a boot kicking the backside of a pinko college professor. TRUD! the sound of a peacenik being strangled.”

TRUD!: FROM THE WHITE UNDERGROUND didn’t last too long either. Like the U.S. Nationalist Party, it was not understood in the milieu of a brain dead American Right.

But with the situation of the USA and its alien regime so dire right now, maybe this time the message will find an audience. I’ll be re-printing some stuff from them in the near term.

Read this.

Tellingly, Mosley received no support in England as the British right resisted any serious collaboration with ‘off-color whites’ in Catholic Spain and Italy.

Nordicism has much to answer for.

…in my view Bolton fails to make this case for Yockey’s continued political relevance on the right…

In my view, Coogan was a snide scumbag, and his death (that we can only hope was accompanied by pain, agony, and despair) has been one of the few bright spots of 2020.

July 4 and Amren Survey

And other news.

First, a Happy Fourth of July for my American readers. On this day, acknowledge that the United States of America is dead, kaput, finished, ended – murdered, buried under a pile of yarmulkes, basketballs, tacos, chopsticks, and saris.

And, truth be told, also buried under a pile of Pepes, Keks, MAGAs, and March of the Titans. There is plenty of blame to go around.

See this.  Readers of this blog, as well as those familiar with my work elsewhere, know that I have long been a strong proponent of empirical approaches such as surveying. Thus, I approve of the Amren plan, assuming it is executed effectively.

I submitted some potential questions to them. These are reproduced here:

I have long been an advocate of surveys in order to determine White attitudes on race and more important to determine why Whites have naive and destructive views on race and why, if they DO have sane and reasonable opinions on the subject, why they do not support explicitly pro-White groups, political candidates, etc.

The KEY point is to formulate questions that will generate data that will be ACTIONABLE by our side.

Thus, we need to dissect the following:

1. If Whites DO in fact have "race realist" and "pro-White" views, or are at least open to these views, would they support pro-White groups or candidates?  Why or Why not?  What EXACTLY are the reasons why Whites withhold support from pro-White groups and candidates? What PRECISELY are the barriers that prevent pro-White groups and candidates from garnering support from Whites who otherwise might agree with them on issues?  Ideology?  Extremism?  Fear of "social pricing" retribution - doxxing, job loss, loss of status, shaming, etc.?  Do the pro-White groups or candidates say or do things that repulse them?  If so, what exactly?

2. What are the things pro-White groups or candidates should do to win support from Whites?  What are some of the talk and action Whites, particularly "awakened" Whites, want and expect from White leadership that will garner support?  Would these Whites support and vote for a candidate that was openly pro-White?  Why or Why not?

3. In what ways can "social pricing" against pro-White activism be fought?  What assurances and support would Whites require in order to become more active?

4. Do Whites believe that there is nothing that can be done?  

5. If certain Whites are not pro-White but are at least open-minded, what kind of arguments could convince them of the rightness of the pro-White cause?

6. If certain Whites are opposed to our views, is there anything that can dissuade them? What would they require to change their minds?  What would they require to at least let our side express our opinions openly in the marketplace of ideas?

7. What sort of things do more realistic Whites require in their own lives to make their adjustment to modern day America more bearable? Would they support any group or candidate providing that?  

8. Would Whites realistic about race be willing to vote Third Party, or should pro-White electoral politics only be through the GOP?

I am less interested in what non-Whites think, but questions that focus attention on non-White hypocrisy and cognitive dissonance would be useful, such as:

1. If Whites are so terribly racist, why do non-Whites insist on racial integration?  Why do they immigrate to majority White nations?  Why do they follow Whites when Whites try to get away with White flight? Why do non-Whites behave as if they have an inherent right for access to Whites?

2. How is White Privilege consistent with White demographic dispossession, affirmative action, etc.?  How is White Supremacy consistent with the fact that major corporations, academia, mass media, politicians speak in one voice in favor of non-Whites and against Whites?  If America is a "White Supremacist state" why is doxxing of "White racists" effective and why are White activists deplatformed?

3. Why do groups like Asians and Jews have a higher net worth and incomes than Whites?  If that is from "hard work and intelligence" why doesn't that explain Black and Hispanic failure?

4. If America is a White Supremacist society, why was the death of George Floyd a national crisis, but not the deaths of Tony Timpa, Daniel Shaver, and Justine Damond?

Some of those questions for non-Whites should be asked to Whites as well.

Of course, I realize that these questions may need to be put into a multiple choice format, depending on how you do the survey, but the point here is to inform you as to what sorts of topics should be addressed.  How to actually formulate the questions is a job for a pollster.

That was my input.

The above questions can indeed be put into the proper form by a skillful pollster.  That may not come cheap, but readers of this blog know the facts about money and the “movement.” It’s there, it is just being misdirected and mismanaged.  Is more needed?  Certainly.  But the “movement” should first demonstrate that it effectively uses what it already has before rattling the tin cup for even more. Doing a good job with this survey project would be one example of an effective use of funds.

Common sense against Boratian stupidity:

Bruno Bucciaratti

Posted July 2, 2020 at 6:36 am | Permalink

If Tucker did what the author suggests, he’d be fired and forgotten about.

You move the Overton Window by standing at its rightmost edge, not by LARPing far outside of it, Heimbach-style.

Tucker is the only voice in American media speaking for any sort of implicitly white interests. If we lost him, we’d simply have nothing.

Will reading this literally kill Derbyshire?  Don’t read it, Johnny!  Save yourself!

And so, Derbyshire engages in more measured groveling.

Is this Zman?

“Lying sophist” – pot meet kettle.  By the way libertarians are still useless after they transition into Alt Righters.

What “accelerationists” like this miss is that their beloved “movement” is as useless and inert as is Trump.

Four years of Trump – OK, is your “movement” ready for further “acceleration?”  All these johnny-come-latelys are delusional.  Fact – your “movement” is weaker, stupider, and more pathetic today than at any time since my involvement, a quarter-century ago.  It’s been wrecked by the Alt Right, and the only “acceleration” will be your “movement” accelerated into the dustbin by a leftist broom.