Against Levitsky and Ziblatt

Disgusting anti-White racism.

Read this nonsense.

Posted on October 27, 2020End Minority Rule

Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt, New York Times, October 23, 2020

First, Levitsky is definitely a Jew. I can be forgiven for suspecting that “Daniel Ziblatt” is also a member of the tribe – if I am mistaken then I stand corrected, but the main idea here is that this anti-White tirade is to a large degree likely motivated by a concern for Jewish interests and by hostility toward America’s historic White Christian majority. But I suppose that, to Taylor, they are HuWhite – or (((HuWhite))).

The hypocrisy of these academic scum is amazing. In the past, when America’s White Christian majority was more demographically prominent, and was giving landslide victories to the likes of Nixon and Reagan, we were warned about the “tyranny of the majority” – that was a danger to the rights of minorities.  Indeed, that alleged problem with majority dominance was one justification given for the government to push mass immigration, affirmative action, and busing against the will of the majority, and why liberal judges repeatedly blocked implementation of state referenda voted in by the majority.  But now, with non-Whites and the Left ascendant, majority rule is great and we need to beware of the horror of "Minority Rule." The rules of the game have changed quite dramatically, eh?

The hypocrisy of Levitsky and Ziblatt is also demonstrated by this comment about their book:

Some of the best parts of the book outline how the gatekeepers and the unwritten rules emerged and functioned in the history of American politics, and the threats to the democratic norms that the country experienced. In the history of the U.S., the gatekeeping that did emerge and the “democratic norms” were accompanied by exclusionary policy toward African-Americans and women, such that the U.S. for most of this history could not be characterized as fully democratic.

Thus, when the old White majority did things that Levitsky and Ziblatt do not approve of, then that was bad and a threat to “democratic norms.” At that time, majority rule "could not be characterized as fully democratic." On the other hand, today, when a new majority – transformed by mass immigration enforced (by minority elites) on the unwilling previously dominant White majority – promises to act in a manner that these two scum approve of, then suddenly it is imperative to follow the will of the majority, and any inhibition on the will of the majority is what threatens “democratic norms.”

This is what Steve Sailer calls “Who? Whom?” When the majority acts in a manner that supports White interests, then the majority is bad and we must protect minorities from the “tyranny of the majority.”  However, if the majority acts against White interests, then the will of the majority is sacrosanct, and “Minority Rule” is suddenly the real danger to democracy.

The Trump presidency has brought American democracy to the breaking point. 

No, the hysterical anti-Trump Left has done that.

The president has encouraged violent extremists…

Like BLM and Antifa?

…deployed law enforcement and other public institutions as weapons against rivals…

Like Charlottesville intentionally sabotaging the Unite the Right rally? Like what European “democracies” do to nationalists?  Like what Democrats are threatening to do to Trump and members of his administration after a Biden victory?

…and undermined the integrity of elections through false claims of fraud, attacks on mail-in voting and an apparent unwillingness to accept defeat.

Big Tech and social media interfering in the election is, of course, OK. After all, Twitter, Facebook, and Google should determine the outcome of the election, right?

In this, he has been aided and abetted by a Republican Party that has fallen into the grips of white nationalism. 

The idea of Trump as a “White nationalist” is ludicrous. Let’s consider Trump:

• A man with a Jewish family and whose foreign policy is slavishly pro-Israel.
• His major domestic policy achievement was pro-Black “prison reform” that was championed by Black activists and by Kanye West and Kim Kardashian – not something that Trump’s base wanted or asked for.
• His DOJ persecutes his own supporters while allowing BLM and Antifa to run wild with impunity.
• Trump’s major 2020 campaign initiative is the “Platinum Plan” to shower Blacks with goodies at the expense of Whites.
• Trump was ready to sign off on DACA amnesty.
• Trump routinely denounces not only White nationalists but also multi-racial civic nationalist Trump supporters like the “Proud Boys.”
• Trump has essentially done nothing of substance for his White base, and he never mentions White interests, while constantly pandering to Blacks.
• His major Presidential pardon was for the arrogant and obnoxious race-mixing and White woman-beating Negro boxing “hero” Jack Johnson.

Whew!  That's some White nationalist indeed! Trump is about as consistent with “White nationalism” as typical Jewish academics are consistent with honesty and decency.

And to say that the Republican Party as a whole “has fallen into the grips of white nationalism” is even more ludicrous, as that party was lockstep against even Trump’s milquetoast civic nationalism until he won the election - and even after that prominent members of his own party obstructed him at every turn. Many prominent Republicans are opposing Trump’s re-election precisely because they cannot abide even the slightest whiff of White interests, and they can’t wait to slip back to the “good old days” of Jack Kemp and John McCain. The reality is that the Democratic Party has fallen (long ago) into the grips of Black nationalism and Jewish supremacism. 

The Republican base and its white Christian core, facing a loss of its dominant status in society, has radicalized, encouraging party leaders to engage in voter suppression, steal a Supreme Court seat in 2016 and tolerate the president’s lawless behavior. 

As opposed to months of leftist domestic terrorism, actually setting up a Marxist-Anarchist “autonomous zone,” murder and attempted murder, assaults – followed by talk of packing the Supreme Court and doing away with the Bill of Rights. Got to love those non-radical Democrats and their supporters!

As a result, Americans today confront the prospect of a crisis-ridden election, in which they are unsure whether they will be able to cast a ballot fairly, whether their ballots will be counted…

Like the Trump ballots found thrown in the garbage.

…whether the candidate favored by voters will emerge victorious…

What voters?  The invaders imported by the System?

…and whether the vote will throw the country into violence.

Violence is coming from your side, liars.

Yet if American democracy is nearing a breaking point, the crisis generated by the Trump presidency could also be a prelude to a democratic breakthrough. Opposition to Trumpism has engendered a growing multiracial majority that could lay a foundation for a more democratic future. 

“A more democratic future” = dispossession of, and hatred toward, White Americans.

Public opinion has shifted in important ways, especially among white Americans.

Is there a fair and open marketplace of ideas? Or relentless propaganda, akin to brainwashing indoctrination?

Not only do most Americans disapprove of the way Mr. Trump is handling his job…

After years of unprecedented propaganda – on any given day for the past four years, it seems like 50% of the articles on Yahoo News are about Trump, and 99.9999999999999999999% of those articles have been consistently highly negative. But that’s a fair marketplace of ideas, right?  When Big Tech censors the President, that’s “freedom," right?

…but an unprecedented majority now embraces ethnic diversity and racial equality, two essential pillars of multiracial democracy.

“Two essential pillars” – according to ethnocentric Jews – of a “multiracial democracy” that no one asked for. Question – where in the mainstream media or academia or anywhere do the “unprecedented majority” get any anti-diversity narratives? Oh, that’s right – absolutely nowhere.  Funny how effective relentless brainwashing is, no?

Yet translating this new multiethnic majority into a governing majority has been difficult. Democracy is supposed to be a game of numbers: The party with the most votes wins. In our political system, however, the majority does not govern. Constitutional design and recent political geographic trends — where Democrats and Republicans live — have unintentionally conspired to produce what is effectively becoming minority rule.

Minority rule was fine as long as it was a Jewish-Colored-White Leftist minority opposing the wishes of America’s White Christian majority.  Now that the script is flipped, “Minority Rule” is suddenly unacceptable.

Today, however, American parties are starkly divided along urban-rural lines: Democrats are concentrated in big metropolitan centers…

That is because of the mass immigration that THE MAJORITY opposed in the past, and that was FORCED upon them by MINORITY RULE.  But, hey, as long as that was anti-White, it’s OK. No problem whatsoever.

…whereas Republicans are increasingly based in sparsely populated territories. This gives the Republicans an advantage in the Electoral College, the Senate and — because the president selects Supreme Court nominees and the Senate approves them — the Supreme Court.

After all, elections must be decided in New York City and Los Angeles. Anything else is a holocaust. Oh vey!

Recent U.S. election results fly in the face of majority rule. Republicans have won the popular vote for president only once in the last 20 years and yet have controlled the presidency for 12 of those 20 years. Democrats easily won more overall votes for the U.S. Senate in 2016 and 2018, and yet the Republicans hold 53 of 100 seats. The 45 Democratic and two independent senators who caucus with them represent more people than the 53 Republicans.

There were no complaints about that system when the Left was getting its way on social and racial issues for the past 60 years. Suddenly, it is a problem. The Left does not care about democratic process, the majority, or fairness and consistency. They simply demand their desired outcome, at any cost.

This is minority rule.

Which was fine with the likes of Levitsky and Ziblatt when it was their minority in charge. When we got affirmative action, busing, mass immigration, and H-1B expansion against the majority’s wishes, that was all great for the Left. Suddenly the wishes of 50.1+% of the population are all-important.

An electoral majority may not be enough for the Democrats to win the presidency this year either. According to the FiveThirtyEight presidential model, if Joe Biden wins the popular vote by one to two points, there is an 80 percent chance that Mr. Trump wins the presidency again. If Mr. Biden wins by two to three points, Mr. Trump is still likely to win. Mr. Biden must win by six points or more to have a near lock on the presidency.

That’s the law. They would have no problem with that if Democrats were winning.

In America today, then, the majority does not govern. 

When did it ever? The only difference now is that you don’t like the outcome.

This disjuncture cries out for reform. We must double down on democracy.

Yeah…60 years too late, eh? If we had “doubled down on democracy” back then, the demographic changes that Levitsky and Ziblatt are now leveraging would never have occurred.

This means above all defending and expanding the right to vote. HR-1 and HR-4, a package of reforms approved by the House of Representatives in 2019 but blocked by the Senate, is a good start. HR-1 would establish nationwide automatic and same-day registration, expand early and absentee voting, prohibit flawed purges that remove eligible voters from the rolls, require independent redistricting commissions to draw congressional maps, and restore voting rights to convicted felons who have served their time. HR-4 would fully restore the 1965 Voting Rights Act, which was gutted by the Supreme Court’s Shelby County vs. Holder ruling in 2013.

Anything that expands the base of low-IQ colored Democrat voters is all good!  Why should the criteria for voting be as stringent as, say, boarding a plane or buying liquor and cigarettes?  For shame!

Doubling down on democracy also means reforms that empower majorities, such as eliminating the Senate filibuster. The filibuster, which was rarely used during much of the 20th century, has turned into a routine instrument of legislative obstruction. There were more Senate filibusters over the last two decades than in the previous eight. All meaningful legislation now effectively requires 60 votes, which amounts to a permanent minority veto.

Never a problem before when Democrats got their way.  Suddenly, it is all a problem now.

A democratic reform agenda should also include an offer of statehood to the District of Columbia and to Puerto Rico, which would provide full and equal representation to nearly four million Americans who are currently disenfranchised. And it should include elimination of the Electoral College. 

Anything that ensures Democratic electoral victories is all good!  

If we are so concerned with democracy and the will of the majority, we should eliminate leftist judges blocking the will of the people (reflected in majority voting), and how about reversing all of the “civil rights” and immigration actions forced through against decades of majority opposition? 

Not only would ending minority rule be inherently democratic, but, importantly, it would also encourage the Republican Party to abandon its destructive course of radicalization.

Radical? Republicans? What about the Democrats? Dispossessing and disenfranchising America’s historic majority, electing a new people through mass immigration, eliminating the Electoral College that has been an integral part of American political history, packing the Supreme Court, eroding the key constitutional protections of the Bill of Rights, supporting and enabling months of Marxist-Anarchist domestic terrorism and violent mass rioting – all of that is not radical, no sir!  On the other hand, opposing illegal immigration – like that dastardly neo-Nazi lunatic Dwight Eisenhower – is “radical” and “white nationalism.” Can you believe these gaslighting pieces of scum? 

What these two pieces of filth mean by "radical" is Trump's 2016 campaign (as opposed to his actual governance) that was targeted toward implicit White interests (very implicit, by the way).  And what if the GOP decides to ditch even this indirect association with the most faint focus on White interests?  I REALLY WISH that someone with a public forum – Tucker Carlson, are you listening? – would tell all of these types that:

WHITE AMERICANS ARE NOT OBLIGATED TO VOTE REPUBLICAN, THERE IS NO LAW OF THE UNIVERSE THAT SAYS THAT REPUBLICANS AUTOMATICALLY GET THE VOTES OF RIGHT-OF-CENTER WHITES.

Republicans decide to go back to the days when their agenda was exactly the same as the Democrats except for capital gains tax rates?  Go back to John McAmnesty and all the rest?  Take White votes for granted and pander to coloreds (what the “White nationalist” Trump is doing, by the way)?  Sure, they can do that and they probably will. But they can’t force Whites to vote for them, and without all (or the vast majority of) Trump’s base on board, the Republicans won’t be able to even get elected dogcatcher.  

Maybe Whites will be stupid enough to vote for GOP cucks – but not if I and others like me have anything to say about it.  If mainstream Republicans leave an open political niche space to their right, then it should and must be filled by dissident Republicans or by a third party.  If we are going to be ruled by Democrat policies, then let’s do it honestly, without the fiction of a “Republican opposition” whose own policies are essentially identical with that of the Democrats.  Scum like Levitsky and Ziblatt want de facto (or de jure?) one party rule – Marxist totalitarianism is in their blood; just look at the history of communism and the Soviet Union.

If we are going to have leftist policies either way, best to have it enacted by the Democrats and have Whites see them responsible for it, while the GOP cucks are allowed to fade away into the dustbin of history and a new political option for White Americans takes shape. The GOP has been a millstone around the necks of White Americans for decades; if they eschew right-wing populism then there is absolutely no reason not to free Whites from the Republican yoke.

Democracy requires more than majority rule. 

That’s when White Christians were a clear majority with a strong hold on the electorate. At that time, majority rule was not enough and we needed pro-minority intervention. But now is different, right?

But without majority rule, there is no democracy. 

Again, that’s how things are now, with White Christians in demographic eclipse and Sailer’s “coalition of the fringes" ascendant. Before, it was all about the dangers of the “tyranny of the majority” and now it is the dastardly horrors of Minority Rule. They got to keep those nasty Whites down any way they can – after all, the next pogrom is just around the corner.

Either we become a truly multiracial democracy or we cease to be a democracy at all.

After all, a “true…democracy” must be “multiracial” – that is, only in what used to be majority White nations. In Asia, Africa, etc. that’s not an issue.  Asia for Asians, Africa for Africans, and White nations for everyone.  Right, Levantine filth?

White Americans fought and died in World War II – killing their European brothers in the process – to save the Jews; their reward was having the Jews steal the White Americans’ nation from them.

Do we need to wonder why “anti-Semitism” has been a ubiquitous presence in every nation that has ever had a substantial Jewish population?

Levitsky and Ziblatt need to be challenged on their hypocrisy as outlined above.

More important, Whites need to engage in collectivist identity politics like every other group.

And here’s an idea. If trash like these two academics really want to empower “democracy” then why don’t they empower third parties?  Why don’t they promote the breakdown of the two party monopoly?  Why don’t they allow people real choice?

Alas, you see, real choice and true democracy will endanger the fragile “majority” that they have cobbled together, and the more major political parties there are, the more difficult it will be to get their desired outcome, and the more difficult it will be to get everyone to be politically identical.  A “two party” (really one party) system with a “coalition-of-the-fringes” Democratic “majority” coupled to pathetic Republicans becoming a “lower tax” version of the Democrats is easy to control. Three or more parties, in which a White plurality can have real power, is a threat.

Remember, these guys can care less about “democracy”- they just want their agenda actualized.  The Stupid Right should call them out on this, but, alas, if the Right would do so, they wouldn’t be Stupid now, would they?