Toward a New Movement, Part III

Part III: Identity, and the convergence of the genetic and the cultural-civilizational.

Let's consider:

Genetic kinship will replace racial “purity.”  As per Salter, ultimate interests are genetic interests, and genetic interests are based upon genetic kinship.  Only genetic kinship is relevant for biopolitics. This contrasts to the unscientific strawman of racial “purity” which is usually derived from some a priori comparison to a picked parental population.  Since all genetic differences, regardless of their derivation (e.g., “admixture” [real or an artifact], selective pressures, genetic drift, etc.) influence genetic kinship, measurement of such kinship is the most inclusive and definitive approach for understanding our ultimate interests.  We accept the European genepool for what it is now and strive to improve it in the future.  To use Yockey’s terminology in a new way, we completely replace outdated and unscientific “vertical” concerns with “purity/admixture” with “horizontal” concerns with genetic kinship and genetic interests.

That is fairly straightforward and I have written about this before to a great extent, multiple times, and there is no need to get into it again here. However, there is a related issue. Fetishists comb through population genetics studies to cherry pick data that they breathlessly present to show that some European ethnies may be ever-so-slightly closer to some NEC ethny by Fst than they are to some other European ethny from which they are the most genetically distant from. So, as a hypothetical example, two European ethnies that are at the absolute farthest ends of the European genetic spectrum may have a Fst of, say, 0.0043, and one of those European ethnies may have a Fst to some NEC group of, say, 0.0042. A 0.0001 difference!  Take that, you pan-Europeanists!

Now, Fst is not the best measure of genetic distance or kinship, as it is a relative measure of genetic variation between vs. genetic variation within, so the latter can affect the latter. But, let’s put methodological problems aside, and assume for the moment that the interpretation of the values is valid – the most genetically distant European ethnies, at the absolute extremes of the spectrum, may be very slightly more distant than is some European ethny and some NEC group that is relatively similar to Europeans (e.g., Berbers or Levantines). What about this?

I have written about Identity before being a synergistic interaction between genetic, phenotypic, cultural-civilizational, and historical identities and characteristics. It is not purely based on genetics and genetic distances. Even further, the correlation between genetics and culture means that genetic similarity within the European family can be relatively increased, compared to others, over time, as described below.

Total biocultural Identity will replace as narrower biological and cultural identities as the major focus of European Being.  The narrower identities will still exist, but as part of Identity, and the narrower identities will become increasingly aligned with that of Identity. Biological and cultural classifications by themselves are not disjunctive, only total Identity is disjunctive. The ultimate solution to any discordance between Identity and biological identities is this: we will align our biological/genetic interests with Identity by closing the borders and stopping non-European gene flow into European territories. Thus, over time the genetic boundaries between Europe and the Others will become ever larger and more distinct; the genetic commonalities between Europeans, compared to the Others, will become larger and more integrated.  The same applies to any potential cultural overlaps between The West and The Rest.  Examples of this possibility, as exemplified by the Levant and by China, are shown here.

See the following for the examples of this:

See this.

And this.

Thus, pan-Europeanism is, in a way, self-fulfilling, since actualizing pan-Europeanism will, over time, increase the relative genetic similarity of Europeans to each other, compared to their genetic distance to non-European groups, tracking with the cultural-civilizational divide.