Blackpilled

Enough is enough.

We’ve had the Steve King, James Watson, and Covington school fiascos – all underlining the sad state of Euro-America and the complete lack of any accomplishment of the “movement” since its inception.

Every day brings fresh evidence that Trump is an utter fraud, who hoodwinked a gullible White America and an equally gullible Alt Right.  We have a President who is, essentially, a semi-retarded grifter who tweets like a teenage girl, and who was almost literally worshipped, for years, by the Far Right.  And only Coulter has the integrity to publicly admit being wrong; all the others now shake their heads sadly about Trump, making believe that they never designated him as “the last chance for White America” and an “American Caesar” who was going to “stabilize the System through positive effects on White demographics.”  Down the memory hole with all of that!

Then, the other shoe drops about ancestry testing, after previous revelations about incompetent assays, bizarre and constantly shifting results, and online reports about “cooking the data” to spite “racists” (and the weak denials about that fall flat after what was done to Watson and Cobb)* – we now find out that even identical twins cannot get consistent results, and that 13% worth of ancestry can appear and disappear dependent on what company does the test or the version of test used.

Then we have the continued stupidity of the “movement,” ruminations about resurrecting the Alt Right (for the love of god, why?), outrageous gaslighting narratives about why all the purported promise of 2016 has fallen apart, coupled with utter delusion about “leaders” debating on whether or not we need to wait “another 50 years” for “victory.”

We have “leaders” whose “extreme vetted” meetings were infiltrated by anti-racist activists with transparent covers; in one case, the infiltrator was allowed to address a meeting with a speech about “the dangers of infiltration.”  Apparently, that individual wormed his way in because a UK activist who wears shorts to meetings and has rituals where Viking horns are blown and mead is drunk is racially infatuated with Scandinavians and the infiltrator was a Swede (and, by the way, is a homosexual as well).

Merkel is still in power in Germany, most nations signed off on the genocidal migration accord, and “European populism” – and “Brazilian populism” as well – is not in any real sense more successful or sustainable than the Trump fraud in the USA.

Meanwhile, any sane and honest reading of the news amply demonstrates that the “West” is in terminal decline, full of overweight, simple-minded sheeple, who either worship Negro behemoths running into each other on a football field (the men) or who post hysterical diatribes on social media because someone “fat-shamed” their yeast-infested lardass selves and they now need to vent their fury on the few remaining non-freaks in a irretrievably wrecked society (the women).

The situation is bad and getting worse, there is zero hope on the horizon, and reading about Der Movement is a purgative that rivals syrup of ipecac.

At least for the time being, I’m not going to be posting as much, certainly not every day as I’ve been doing, and I’m going to be - at least for now - reducing or eliminating my regular reading of vomit-inducing “movement” sites.

I’ll need to put more time and effort into IRL activities, while, with respect to activism, trying to see if a scientifically literate Yockeyian Movement can be started to replace the nonsense we have today.

To put it in Alt Right language – I’m completely and utterly Blackpilled.

*I do not believe that either Watson or Craig are 16% or 14% Negro.  If that is so, the “results” were either due to the utter incompetence of the tests used or fabrication of the “data” for political purposes.** Neither possibility builds confidence.  

Meanwhile, we read the following from LivingDNA:

The company is run by David Nicholson and Hannah Morden-Nicholson who saw an opportunity to show humanity that we are all made up of all of us, dissolving the concept of race through Ancestry DNA testing.

“Dissolving the concept of race through Ancestry DNA testing.”  Oh, I’m sure they’ll be real conservative in their admixture estimates, of that let us have no doubt!

The typically mature and thoughtful response of Type I Nutzis to the testing flim-flam can be read here.

**Those results are even more troubling when one considers that both Watson and Cobb derive from ethnies that are well represented in parental population samples. Therefore, if we assume the results are inaccurate, then more “innocent” explanations fall away, and we are left with test incompetence or company mendacity.

I have four sets of questions for ancestry testing companies:

1. Assume that ethnic English are used as the parental population defining “European.”  Individuals from which of the following groups would most likely test as being a very high percentage European – English, Greek or Russian?  What if the parental population for “European” was Greek instead?  What if it was Russian?

2. Assume that the parental population samples defining “English” were derived from 100 ethnic English individuals living in London (if that many still exist).  Who is more likely to test as “100% English” – the same London English used as the parental population, or completely different English individuals living in, say, Liverpool?

3. If customers observe their ancestry percentages fluctuating 10% or 15 % or 20% or more from one test to another, or even from one version of the same test to another, is there any objective basis currently available to us to decide which set of results are more accurate, precise, and definitive?

4. If at the 90% confidence level (that is still less than that typically used in the scientific literature), customers observe as much as, say, 25-50% “unassigned” ancestry (***), can they have any confidence that results at the lower confidence intervals are any more dependable than flipping a coin or rolling dice to choose between the top two or three likely outcomes?  Doesn’t such a high level of “unassigned” ancestry mean that the available parental populations are inadequate to determine for those customers results that have any reasonable statistical rigor whatsoever?

Since we do not expect to get any honest answers – or, likely, any answers at all – to these questions, I will answer them myself:

1. English, Greek, Russian.

2. The group from London.

3. No.

4. No, Yes.

*** I know some people whose “unassigned” ancestry at the 90% confidence level is only 2-3%, and I know other people who are up to 40-50% (!).  Obviously, the data (e.g. the default 50% confidence interval data) for these two sets of people are of completely different nature.  The former are based on a foundation of reasonably solid parental population representation and the latter are floating off in a realm of speculation, uncertainty, and a complete lack of any real accuracy and precision. One could even say it is irresponsible for a company to present data to the second group.  If you don’t have the parental population coverage for all of your customers, then go about obtaining it, rather than defrauding them with inaccurate nonsense.

Keep in mind that according to typical scientific standards, 90% is not really conservative at all, at least 95% is required. One wonders how much “unassigned” some folks will have at 95+% confidence levels?  50%” 60%? More?