Hard Truths About Der Movement

Face reality.

Someone else gets it!

Melanie

I don't understand the Slant eyed oriental phillia on Amren. Dear ladies and gentlemen, East and South Asians are not your friends or brothers in the struggle just because you share certain traits or are attacked by the same groups. If anything Asians (especially the Han Chinese) are far more ruthless and efficient than blacks when it comes to their covert hatred for whites. They are also definitely not white adjacent. They are our enemies and rivals. Europeans/ Whites have our own culture, religion and trajectory. Asians are not part of it. Period.

A response to that good sense: 

Dear Melanie,

For your understanding, consider the possibility that Amren is motivated by aesthetic preferences for high IQ Asians who play the violin and are “law abiding” and for high IQ erudite cosmopolitan Jews who are ever-so-charming at cocktail parties, and also motivated by crude ethnic resentments against “uncouth” White ethnics. That would explain much, wouldn’t it?

Best, Ted

Der Movement’s profound lack of interest about the paper discussed here essentially reveals some hard truths about the “movement” – it is, and always has been, a scam, and not only because of the money-hungry grifters running the show deluding poor fools that giving D’Nations actually accomplishes anything. It is also a scam because its alleged fundamental premise of supporting White nationalism is a lie. Look, if Der Movement was “on the level” then the Stable European Population Structure paper should be music to their ears, since it refutes the Left’s assertions that massive demographic change (at least for Whites) is normal and inevitable and such has always been a part of Europe’s history.  No, the actuality is that despite whatever demographic events that have occurred, they have been so limited in scope that the basic population structure of Europe has been mostly unchanged for the last 3,000 years.  Therefore, the current demographic crisis is unnatural and it is not inevitable; indeed, it is ahistorical, abnormal, and it is being imposed – The Great Replacement.  

All good, right?

But, you see, that was never Der Movement’s main interest. This paper – and other archaeogenetics papers ignored by Der Movement – refutes the REAL ideological foundation of the “movement” – Nordicism, NW European self-worship, and ethnic resentments against Southern and Eastern Europeans.  The paradigms of “Nordic Rome became populated by Levantine mongrels and those self-same mongrels are precisely the modern greasy Afro-Arabic Afrowop” and “Nordic Sicilians became Negro mulattoes from the Moors” and “Eastern Europeans are essentially Asiatic Turkics and Mongols” and “Northern and Western Europe was always absolutely racially pure from the earliest mists of time” are disproved by this paper, and by other papers analyzing real ethnic and racial histories. Therefore, even when a paper strongly supports the idea that modern Europeans are indigenous and represent similar stocks to the ethnogenesis of thousands of years ago, that paper must be ignored if it doesn’t support the idea that the Ancient Romans were genetically Scandinavian and looked like Dolph Lundgren, while the modern Italian is akin to a 50:50 mix of Nigerians and Iraqis.  If the paper suggests that non-European migrants were in Northcentral/Western Europe in ancient times, just like in Italy, but in both cases there was no permanent significant demographic change, then the paper must be ignored by Der Movement.  It doesn’t matter if the paper as a whole strongly supports a White nationalist narrative, because Der Movement was really never about White nationalism. The truth about Der Movement is thus exposed; the scam of Der Movement becomes evident.

There is no White nationalism extant in any established “movement” today, it is a fraud, at least in America.  If you want genuine White nationalism, and you should, you are going to have to build it yourself. I keep on offering the Sallis Groupuscule as a foundation for such a project, but no one is interested.  Enjoy being scammed, then.

America is Ready for Some Movement Reality

A riposte to a Counter-Currents article.

First, Robert Wallace:

Your pessimism is simply not grounded in reality, my friend. I suggest you listen to my radio interview and refer to the original article and its comment section. No one has come up with a convincing case against Greg and I yet.

Excuse me you mendacious moron, Greg Johnson censors and bans people from his blog and refuses to debate people who could "come up with a convincing case against Greg and I."

It’s real easy to say opponents don’t have a “convincing case” against you when you ignore said opponents, refuse to engage with them and debate them, and censor/ban them from commenting on your website. Under those conditions, you’ll find a lack of effective ripostes, no doubt.

As we can see, character is not a strong point in Der Movement.

To the essay:

American patriots are hungry for white identity politics. It was inevitable. White nations are being wrecked by non-whites acting as tribal blocs. Whites are being attacked as a tribal bloc. Eventually, whites will start fighting back as a tribal bloc.

Sure!  I have been hearing that now for only twenty-five years now.  See this, which is several years out-of-date already.  White folks are waking up!  They need to wake up a bit faster, since they’ve hit the “snooze” button for at least the last quarter century.

Whites have been slow to respond in kind because of traitorous leaders and the silly idea that identity politics is bad, but only for white people. 

Yes, and also because the pro-White “movement” (Der Movement) has been an utter and complete failure, led by affirmative action grifters and populated by a bunch of freaks.

Still, it was only a matter of time before white Americans woke up and started fighting back as whites. Polling data now shows that the awakening is here:[material deleted]

You can read that alleged evidence and the links in the original Counter-Currents article. The details really aren’t all that important, since typical and predictable Der Movement failure will, with clockwork regularity, waste the opportunity, and, once again snatch defeat from the jaws of victory.

The people who are most surprised by this are long-time white advocates, some of whom have been predicting for decades that such an awakening is inevitable. 

Yes, indeed, we’ve been hearing this for decades and it is tiresome.

It is true that white identity was almost nonexistent as recently as the 1990s. 

Were you involved in Der Movement in the 1990s? “Almost nonexistent” is a vast exaggeration. It was less than today - that is true enough. But "almost nonexistent?"

But due to Obama, Trump, Black Lives Matter, the Great Replacement, and open anti-white hatred, whites have caught on to their group interests. 

Really?  Yes, I know opinion polls and other pieces of evidence are moving somewhat in that direction.  But to conclude that “whites have caught on to their group interests” is delusional.  This is the result of people in their little cul-de-sacs, fueling their beliefs, and reading too much into an uptick in White disillusionment, which may or may not be permanent.  If “whites have caught on to their group interests” Trump would have won in 2020 (putting aside accusations of election fraud), and Whites would be more actively resisting the Left.  Further, the “whites have caught on to their group interests” is not evenly distributed among the White population. Such a “catching on” is enriched among less educated, working class, red state Whites, and less extant among educated professionals. I can tell you that the antics of the pro-White “movement” have alienated STEM people. There is a vicious cycle in which the subset of Whites that Der Movement focuses on, and the behavior of Der Movement, alienates other elements of the White population, including elements that will ultimately be required for eventual victory. The more those people are alienated, the more we have pro-White Whites being concentrated on the aforementioned red state elements (think FOX News viewers and Gab users), resulting in more alienation of others, etc. This is not a blueprint for success.

This will only intensify as white Americans continue to be assaulted, and there is no reason to think that our enemies have the foresight and self-control to moderate their attack.

Perhaps. It may be that those “enemies” have at least a vague, even unconscious and incoherent, understanding of Suvorov’s Law – of they pull back and moderate, this would empower the pro-White side and give pro-Whites legitimacy and momentum.

Of course, this awakening is a cause for celebration for white advocates. 

Of course – the typical victory psychosis of Der Right. Prematurely celebrate false, empty victories.

But we can’t rest on our laurels. 

Particularly since you haven’t actually accomplished anything yet.  All of the “good news” - to the extent it is real - has come from sociopolitical trends and events that Der Movement had little to nothing to do with.

Now is the moment to push harder than ever. 

Yes, more Pepe and Kek, more Spencer screaming, more Gaslight Greg fundraising, more $340K “executive compensation” for Mophead, and more multiracial Rosie and the Kids White nationalism.

Although white Americans are hungry for our message, in the upcoming elections, the Republican Party and conservative movement are poised to harvest white discontent–and then channel it into more business as usual: tax cuts for billionaires, giveaways to Our Greatest Ally, Platinum Pandering to non-whites, and color-blind civic nationalism for whites. 

And that’s exactly what will happen. The safety valve will release some White discontent, Bubba Gabster will declare victory, and Der Movement will gibber about “Savitri Devi,” Kali Yuga,” and being “snug in your hobbit hole.”

But responding to anti-white identity politics with Republican pabulum is like taking a knife to a gunfight. 

This Wallace seems like a relative newcomer to Der Movement who breathlessly prattles trite memes like this, commentaries that some of us have been hearing for decades.

It is time to face the truth: these people promote a losing strategy because they want us to lose. Stop listening to them.

Yes, but it is not only Republicans who fit this description. What about the Grand Poobah Quota queens.

What should white advocates do?

Drop Der Movement and join with reasonable activists to build a New Movement.

First, we need to keep promoting our message…

More of the same, more of the same endless failure, freakish behavior, and other nonsense. And of course, send more money to the Quota Queens.

…whites are being attacked as whites, and we need to defend ourselves as whites. 

More of the same old message. Forget about the last quarter century, Der Movement has been saying these things since at least the days of Rockwell.

When the Republicans are swept back into power in November, millions of whites will want to go back to sleep. 

Most likely they will.

We won’t let them.

How?  By repeating the same old tired phrases?  By the same old dogma?

Second, although we have made enormous gains in the battle of ideas…

Evidence?  And don’t cite opinion polls – that has more to do with “Obama, Trump, Black Lives Matter, the Great Replacement, and open anti-white hatred” than any ideas percolating from the utterly failed “movement.”

…we need to convert public opinion into political gains. 

Again, how?  Look at the Trump failure. What is going to be different this time?

Thus the next step is to create a policy institute with two primary goals.

1. More money for Greg?  2. More money for Greg?

First, white identity politics currently exists as a mere “specter,” a bogeyman evoked by the establishment. 

Finally, some truth in this essay.

To turn that specter into a real political force, we need to know how many of us there are, where we are, and how committed we are. 

Yes, and decades of work and millions of dollars of “D’Nations” and you guys still don’t know that and I’m sure you will continue not to know it.

Only then will our votes matter as much as our ideas.

Sure. How do do it?  Talk is cheap.

Second, we need to propose concrete policy solutions to counter the negative effects of globalization and multiculturalism.

Again - and decades of work and millions of dollars of “D’Nations” and here we are in the year 2022 and we are told by this person who has suddenly emerged on the scene that we need “concrete policy solutions.” Gee… wasn’t that what the National Policy Institute was supposed to be about?  Tell me again what credentials and qualifications Dickie Spinster has to be made the leader of that.

I see nothing in this piece that hasn’t been repeated previously and has ended up resulting in nothing.  But, hey, we can be open-minded; if this new institute does some good, great, but I suspect it will be a lot of sound and fury signifying nothing.

Listen to this nonsense.

We need fundraising!  Of course!  Fifty million dollar investment!  Lots of movies for Trevor Lynch! Prospective donors get in touch!  Money, money, money!

Wallace wants to monopolize all support and investment into a SINGLE organization – Counter-Currents’ organization of course. I oppose that completely – Counter-Currents is the enemy of the sort of White nationalism I support; Johnson and Counter-Currents are a pernicious influence, and they must be unalterably opposed, and their agenda of putting all pro-White eggs in their destructive basket must be fought in an unrelenting manner.

The idiots claim that in the 1990s there was no white identity politics or racial friction except in…Louisiana.  Can you believe that utter nonsense?  What about the racial tensions in major cities dating back at least to the 1960s?  Well, since much of that involved White ethnic-Colored friction and since Der Movement considers White ethnics more of a problem than Coloreds, then it makes sense.

Note the “take” on Trump. They say Trump was a fraud who did nothing for Whites, but Wallace points out that Trump, with his rhetoric, helped with metapolitics, essentially balkanization and stimulating White recognition of interests. That is 100% on accord with what I have been saying since 2016, and 100% against Johnson’s idea that Trump is a sincere man of genuine greatness. Wallace says that Trump helped the “movement” – I agree, the idea that the “movement” helped Trump is a delusion.  Der Movement benefited from Trumpism. It was a one-way street.

Gottfried like a father to Wallace – is Wallace someone you can trust?  And both of them stress that they are not critiquing the average Jew in the street (their words) - they are only against "Jewish power" (which comes from where? doesn't the average Jew in the street support that Jewish power?).

This is all actually another black mark in Spencer's ledger - his complete failure with the National Policy Institute (NPI) left the opening for Johnson to move in with his own project.  If NPI was a robust enterprise, it would have filled the "movement" organization niche space and left no room for this aggressive power play by Counter-Currents to monopolize the ideological, political, and activist energies of the "movement."

An institute that promotes destructive ideas and that monopolizes the niche space, inhibiting the emergence of potentially superior competitors is obviously a negative, and worse than not having any institute at all. We have to wait and see what this institute does and if there is anything positive, fine, support it, but if not, if it is negative, then it must be opposed as the perfidious infestation it may very well turn out to be.

Given that this is coming from Counter-Currents, the low point, the pit, of Der Movement, can you trust what they would do?  Consider their constant dishonesty; the following is just one small example of many. More lies from Counter-Currents. No, mendacious Counter-Currents scum (more succinctly: Counter-Currents), in the early days of covid the System was NOT telling us we were all going to die. Instead, all of them, including weasel Fauci, was telling us that covid was no big deal, concern about it was xenophobia and anti-Asian racism (a point the HBD-addicted pro-Asian "movement" would like to forget), and that we should all go to Chinatown and patronize Asian establishments. At that time, it was Trump and the Right ringing the alarm bells, while Trump was denounced as a xenophobic germophobe for stopping travel from China. Then at some point, someone must have planted the idea with Trump that worry about covid would tank the economy and ruin his re-election chances, He started dismissing the importance of covid, at which point the anti-Trump hysterics of the Left changed direction completely and fixated on covid as an INTERNAL threat, targeting coloreds. That's the real time line, and don't rewrite history to match your hobbit hole Luddite conspiritard narratives. The whole covid thing was politicized from day one, but the simplistic narrative that the Left/System was always hysterical about covid is WRONG. Counter-Currents lying scumbags.

As to why Der Movement always has these problems - I have discussed many reasons at my blog, including but not limited to the affirmative action, faulty dogma, grifter and freaks, etc.  But also consider what I term The Bel Riose Syndrome. People in power do not like, indeed, fear, subordinates who are too competent - the see those subordinates as potential rivals and threats; at the very least, when the subordinate is more capable than the leader, it makes the leader look bad by comparison, diminishing that leader's legitimacy. So, the competent and the independent-thinking are eschewed, and mediocre sycophants are the best you get.

Happy New Year 2022

2022.

Happy New Year!

I'm not going to make any New Year's Resolutions here, as my ability to achieve some of my objectives, or even to do certain specific things, is constrained, at least in part, by forces and events beyond my control.

I will say that, in 2022, I would like to sharpen my critiques and deconstruction of Der Movement, while continuing to lay the foundation for a New Movement to supplant the Old.

Other news:

Just like I predicted, and advocated, for the end of the Alt Right disaster, I now do the same for the Amnat Groypers. That retarded stupidity can't exit the activist stage quick enough.

A Gab correspondent who is a friend of this blog alerts me to this. Well, gee, Andy, that does sound familiar. I've said the same, with almost the exact phrasing - what? - maybe a hundred times already at this blog, and many times at my Gab account.  Well, since that's the Sallis refrain, I obviously agree.  I certainly don't want to be in the same "tent" with Torba.

Another Gab correspondent who is a friend of this blog alerts me to Counter-Currents O’Meara expressing himself:

James J OMeara

@JohnRivers whatsa madda you, you racist or something? Itsa mah CULTCHA, we gotta be close, be intimate. We ain't cold duck like you WASPS. Next you'll be saying we shouldna been let, like that Sen. Geary, and you know whata happa to hima.

But, hey, to say that Der Movement is hostile to wops is just "insane" nonsense from "paranoid crap." In any case, Counter-Currents supporters take note. Further, I understand that we cannot all be as sexually repressed as "cold duck" WASP Bill Clinton, a man noted for his Puritan-like personal behavior. 

The Autright blog is yet another critic of the dastardly Ted Sallis; Autright claims that I consider even mild criticism of Southern Europeans, other than my own, as Nordicism. Thus:

Now, lets talk about all the beneficial circumstances Mediterranean Europeans had that led to the development of classical civilization. Of course not, that would be "Nordicism" as Sallis has a tendency to categorize even mild criticisms or quips towards southern Europeans, unless they are his own, as "Nordicism".

No, actually, an honest appraisal of my views would be that I consider continuous severe criticism of Southern Europeans, often factually incorrect and/or misleading, in the absence of a similar level of (even factually correct and mild) criticism of Northern Europeans, to be Nordicism. On my blog, I criticize every group, when it is justified to do so; Nordicists only critique groups other than their own.  

This anti-Sallis criticism was provoked by a Gab comment I made citing an article discussing certain geographical advantages (e.g., coal deposits) that facilitated the Industrial Revolution in Britain. Autright must be a relative newcomer to Der Movement if he doesn't know that a common "movement" trope, something we've all heard for decades, is to ascribe the development of the Classical Civilization to climate and geographical advantages in the Mediterranean region. Thus, those greasy wogs had nice warm weather to create civilization and spread it around the Mediterranean basin, while Nords were shivering in the cold. The "movement'" essentially says that the accomplishments of Southern Europe were due to external factors, such as climate and geography, while the accomplishments of Northern Europe were due to the innate superiority of the people of that region. So, with respect to "lets talk about all the beneficial circumstances Mediterranean Europeans had that led to the development of classical civilization," I direct you to the last half century of "movement" discourse. Been there, done that.

The Gab post that triggered Autright's comment was primarily to mock and ridicule Der Movement's hypocrisy on the topic. To put it in Alt Right/Millennial language, it was "trolling." This ridicule is justified given "movement" hypocritical dogma (or is it dogmatic hypocrisy?). As The Hermansson Humiliation clearly demonstrated, the fundamental foundation of Der Movement is worship of Nordics (just like HBD is based on worship of Jews and Asians). That is the milieu that the "movement" operates in, which is why some people become upset when that dogma is challenged

In truth, while I believe that external factors, like geography, do influence human history to some degree, I still put innate human qualities at the forefront. The people of Britain had a number of admirable human qualities that made the Industrial Revolution possible. The coal helped, but sub-Saharan Africans could be sitting on a mountain of coal and they would just be sitting around eating each other. All of the uranium in Africa certainly hasn't resulted in nuclear reactors being developed there, did it?

But, then, if we accept all of that, then Der Movement's assertion that the accomplishments of Southern Europe were all due to a favorable climate, Mediterranean sea access, or whatever other external factor, is equally suspect. I won't even bother answering the canard that the Classical Civilization was "Nordic" - if anyone still believes that, then they are as delusional as the blank slatists.

And what's with all of the interest in inter-racial differences in masculinity? As others have suggested, the interest in these topics among WN 2.0 and WN 3.0 might be a generational thing concerning Millennials and Zoomers; I personally do not see the reason to obsess over issues of masculinity and talking constantly about "incels" and the like. Ultimately, this is the result of HBD. I don't recall WNs bringing up this subject. It was due to people like Rushton and his cherry picked "French Army Surgeon" material on penis size and all of the sweaty HBD commentaries on Negro testosterone levels and Steve Sailer's excited interest in Negro "charisma" and the like.  Nords, Meds, Slavs, whatever - your enemy is HBD.  "Race realism" is not racial science; it is a bunch of crap that openly identifies as "Yellow Supremacist" while also lauding Jews, and to buy into Rushton's r-k spectrum (that does have some validity in its broadest strokes, but gets taken too far), we have to accept the IQ-manliness trade-off, so if we say Negroes are stone-cold stupid, then they are, in compensation, big-dicked, high-t, macho supermen. I think folks should worry more about the type of poison propagated at Amren, VDARE, and elsewhere than one of my trolling Gab comments. The difference is that the HBDers aren't trolling, they're serious.

Social Disruption, Social Change

Opportunities and failures.

See this. The topic of that essay can considered in two ways, re: pro-White activism.  First, we can consider how racial nationalist dissident politics can contribute to and/or take advantage of societal disruption to lead to revolutionary change in society favoring White nationalism.  Second, we can consider how anti-Der Movement forces within racial nationalist dissident politics can contribute to and/or take advantage of intra-“movement’” “societal disruption" to lead to revolutionary change within White nationalism itself.

The core characteristics of the kind of disruption I’m describing, as we’ll see in the historical episodes that follow, are that it: 1) stems from a loss of faith in a society’s central institutions…

It is quite clear that there is an increasing loss of faith in the System’s “central institutions.” Indeed, this David Potter essay is warning about precisely that, from a mainstream leftist perspective. From a rightist perspective, Der Movement often takes a triumphalist tone about the decay in the System’s institutions and decreased public trust in those institutions. Indeed, there is, across the political spectrum, much talk about this, much discussion about a sense of malaise in “Western liberal democracy.” However, one wonders how much of this talk is cynical play-acting, a need to look “tough, realistic, and pragmatic” and not “naïve,” and how much of it actually is genuine skepticism about the System. There is no doubt some genuine uneasiness in the mainstream, and no doubt that Der Movement always preaches about an “imminent collapse” (we’ve been hearing about that for the last 50-60 years), but one wonders what the top elites really believe. The masses tend to always be dissatisfied, but will almost always never act on their own. Hence, elite opinion and dissident leadership are typically crucial in determining the outcome of these processes.

What about the internal situation within the “movement?”  Obviously, the Sallis Groupuscule and those will similar views exhibit a loss of faith in the “movement’s “central institutions.” Some others on the Far Right are critical as well, although these tend to have different reasons for their dissatisfaction and suggest different solutions. “Movement” leadership for the most part – if out of self-interest if for no other reason – takes a more positive view of the situation within Der Movement, and “double down” on their support for Der Movement’s “central institutions,” even if they criticize certain actions of their competitors. The attitude of the “movement” rank-and-file mirrors that of the masses in the general society – some grumbling and dissatisfaction, but also much conformist inertia, and a willingness to support their chosen leader. They have not yet lost faith, although, objectively, after decades of endless failures and humiliations, they should have already done so.

…2) establishes a set of ideas from what was once the fringe of the intellectual world, placing them at the centre of a revamped political order…

Der Movement believes that this is happening; they look at Trumpian right-wing populism and the occasional comment by Tucker Carlson about race replacement, and they believe that “the Overton window” is moving in their direction and that their beliefs are becoming the center of a “revamped political order.”  As chronicled at my blog, this belief is an unfounded delusion. Der Movement has failed to significantly move their ideas from the (lunatic) fringe to the mainstream because the ideas themselves are flawed and "movement" leadership is inept.  True enough, we dissidents within pro-White activism have also so far failed to move our ideas into the center of the “movement” – but unlike "movement" leaders we haven’t had decades of time nor millions of dollars to work with.  

…and 3) involves a coherent leadership group committed to the change. 

Besides “movement” leadership being inept, it is not very coherent either, and that’s even when only considering the American situation (international leadership is completely fragmented). The various leaders often feud and have competing strategies and tactics. Similarly, those within the “movement” who are dissatisfied also do not constitute any sort of “coherent leadership group,” as they cannot even agree on what about the “movement” they find objectionable, why these problems exist, and what to do about them. So, while these people are (allegedly) “committed to...change” they are not in any way organized as a “coherent leadership group” that can effect the desired change.

These disruptions are apparent in, but not synonymous with, some of the events commonly called revolutions. Disruptions don’t always change who is in charge – they are, in fact, sometimes necessary to preserve a government that is on the verge of failure. But they will at the very least change the way that a governing group thinks and acts.

OK, that is straightforward.

…when a political system is undermined by events such as economic failure, defeat in war or environmental catastrophe, that political system is going to have to change or fail. Success or failure depends on the choices that leaders make, and the ability to give people a fresh set of ideas that will help them see a new way forward.

Der Movement has leaders that make terrible choices, demonstrate bad judgment, and, as stated above, provide bad ideas that do not provide “a new way forward.” The internal dissidents have also not succeeded; whether or not “movement” failures have risen to the level to assure a high probability of success for dissidents such as the Sallis Groupuscule is unclear. There have been a number of “movement” catastrophes, but its members continue to support failed leaders and failed ideas.

The outcome of a disruption is often completely unexpected to contemporaries, and that is precisely because ideas from outside the mainstream were used to shape the solutions to the problems of the time. 

Does that mean that the dissidents vs. the System and the dissidents vs. Der Movement cannot predict what will occur, which also means that their desired outcomes – that they would seem to expect – will not occur?  Or is it too early to tell?  Or, to look at it from the opposite, dominant perspective, is it that the System does not expect the victory of pro-White activism and that the Quota Queens do not expect “movement” dissidents to succeed?  It all depends who are the “contemporaries” who cannot understand what the “outside the mainstream” ideas are that will eventually succeed.  Note that, in both cases, the current leaders hate and oppose the dissidents and that may blind them to the possibilities of dissident success.  The System hates and opposes pro-White activism and the Quota Queens hate and oppose dissidents such as myself.  These attitudes may bias and prevent them from recognizing the possible outcomes.

We can’t know in advance exactly how a disruption will end. What history can teach us is what the circumstances are that lead to a disruption. It can make us realise what we might be facing as a result of the situation we are in today.

It would seem that the System is well advanced to a disruption, but perhaps not as advanced as the “collapse is imminent” “movement” hopes for. Apparently, disruption within the “movement” itself has not yet reached the level where revolutionary change against the Quota Queens and their ideology can be successful.

When we look at one of the first major disruptions, one that is still influencing the world in which we live – the Roman emperor Constantine’s conversion to Christianity in the 4th century CE – we have a case where change had been in the air for a while. In the half-century before Constantine staged the coup that set him on the path to unifying the Roman Empire under his own control, the empire had suffered through plague, massive inflation and a series of military disasters, but the tendency of leadership had been simply to try to make old systems work better.

I won’t directly comment here about Christianity and whether it was good or bad for Rome, but I will say that this example is currently not too relevant as the dominant entities are not ready or willing to compromise with the belief system of the dissidents, even if they believe such would strengthen their position.  Eventually they may get desperate enough to try.

Constantine sent a completely different message when his regime imported concepts from a fringe movement, Christianity, to support its own legitimacy. In doing so, Constantine made use of a small number of Christian advisers, who shaped a new relationship between the Church and Roman society, and joined the closely knit group upon which he depended to run the empire.

Der Movement may believe they could have such influence, but the Alt Right/Trump fiasco underscores how much of that is delusion. And it is unlikely that Der Movement will “import concepts” from the dissidents to its orthodoxy in the near future. Of course, that may all change in time.

This early example exhibits the key characteristics of a disruption: a loss of faith in central institutions (the imperial system of government), the establishment of previously fringe ideas (those of Christianity) at the centre of the political order, and a cohesive, committed leadership group that initiated the change. In elevating Christianity’s role in the empire, Constantine altered patterns of thought, replacing old ideas about imperial authority with a fresh, obviously different model of authority that told people they were moving in a new direction.

That all does not currently exist in either the System-Der Movement situation nor in the Der Movement-dissidents to the “movement” situation.  

I discuss Suvorov’s Law below, in regard to the topic of Potter’s essay; what I can say now is that the Christian Rome scenario illustrates this law. Constantine compromised with Christianity in the thought it would strengthen Rome.  In reality, the church became dominant, to the point that the emperor Theodosius groveled to the bishop Ambrose when the latter excommunicated the former. Just like the humiliation at Canossa much later. Weakening repression, making compromises to the point of embracing aspects of the other side, is what eventually leads to revolutionary change and the victory of that other side.

One thing that helped…in spreading previously marginal ideas was that they could effectively control the available media for mass communication…

Der Movement lacks access to mass communication apart from limited use of the Internet; likewise for intra-“movement” dissidents.  The “word” is not effectively getting out.

…a sign that one of the crucial aspects of a successful disruption is that it creates space in which people can discuss new ideas.

Sure. But the ideas need to be sound and need to be propagated by effective activists.

…Louis could have survived if he had allowed that becoming a constitutional rather than absolute monarch was a reasonable option. But he didn’t. He conspired with other monarchs to overthrow the reform movement in France, thereby undermining centrists who would have allowed him to retain his throne. In so doing, he opened the door to Maximilien Robespierre and other radicals with bold ideas, who claimed that moderation was undermining the revolution – that it could succeed only if traitors were removed and a new state, founded upon the promotion of virtue, replaced the dysfunctional civic constitutions favoured by moderates.

Currently, the System won’t compromise to Der Movement and Der Movement won’t compromise to its dissidents.  This may change in the future if these dominant entities become desperate enough due to  "societal disruption." But I disagree with Potter here; given Suvorov’s Law, Louis’ fate may have been sealed with the first compromise…the Estates General led inexorably to the Terror. Moderation weakens the dam holding back extremism.

The French example stands as a disruption that succeeded in destroying previous institutions without succeeding in building a lasting alternative. It underscores the importance of having political leadership with a clear vision at the moment an existing system of government is overthrown.

Der Movement has utterly failed in this regard.

Lenin’s successor, Joseph Stalin, destroyed the New Economic Policy with his programme of forced collectivisation. His homicidal regime ensured that the Soviet Union could never offer a viable alternative to Western capitalism.

So, what? Lenin would have succeeded?  Why not describe that potential success as “lies” as right-wing beliefs are so described by Potter below?

Another profoundly violent 20th-century disruption, the rise of Nazism, had roots in a theory that implied that nations must inevitably be in competition. Just as within each nation there was an ongoing contest for survival, and government should be geared towards supporting ‘winners’ over ‘losers’ in this struggle, so too there could only be ‘winners’ and ‘losers’ in foreign affairs. 

That seems to be more or less correct, and in accordance with the historical record, but it not always nations in conflict but could be religions, or, races and civilizations.

This view, promulgated by Herbert Spencer, became known as social Darwinism, and it was supported by the pseudoscience of eugenics…

It is not a pseudoscience. One may agree or disagree with eugenics, but it is based on the selection of heritable traits.  One could argue that the development of, say, dog breeds, was a result of “canine eugenics” to select traits of use or other interest to humans. The same could apply to human development.  Whether that would be good or bad is another question, but it is not a “pseudoscience.”  That’s the moralistic fallacy.

…developed by Spencer’s contemporary Francis Galton. Although he was English, Spencer’s theories gained greater currency in the US, where Galton’s eugenic theories were taken up to support restrictive immigration policies and the state-sponsored sterilisation of prisoners on the grounds of ‘mental deficiency’. One person who found such laws appealing was Adolf Hitler.

So?  It’s ad hominem to attack ideas by stating that someone designated as “bad” found those ideas appealing.

Hitler’s political success stemmed in large part from the fact that his assertions about Germany’s path – that it could have won the First World War, that it had been stabbed in the back, and that its problems could be solved by undoing the treaty that had ended the war – were familiar to the electorate from other sources. These positions were lies…

The “stab in the back” apparently was not true.  But who is to say that it was impossible for Germany to have won WWI?  Or that reversing the Treaty of Versailles would be helpful to Germany?  Why were that all “lies?”

…but the lies were popular. Hitler’s extreme version of racist social Darwinism was initially on the fringe of German thought but, linked to his anticommunism, it was tolerated outside Nazi circles.

So?

Yet an anticommunist message backed by lies…

Labelling all of Hitler’s beliefs as “lies” is simplistic thinking bordering on childish.

…would not be sufficient to explain Hitler’s rise to power. Echoing previous disruptions, this required the disintegration of faith in government.

So?  This seems obvious.

The value of history is that it enables us to detect patterns of behaviour in the present that have had serious consequences in the past.

Like oppressing majority populations?

Today, there are signs that the US and European liberal democratic systems are under threat. The most obvious of these is a loss of trust in public institutions.

See above. This perception is present throughout the political spectrum and thus reflects some degree of reality.

Factors such as the willingness of Western governments to allow widespread impoverishment, the weakening of labour organisations, and the failure to provide adequate healthcare and other necessities, feed into powerful movements seeking to undercut the mainstream political system.

What an oblivious, self-unaware jackass David Potter is.  He’s focusing only on those issues that he, and his leftist associates, find distressing.  The rise of right-wing populism, which is the danger that Potter is really agonizing about, derives from completely different sets of dissatisfactions. If Potter represents the degree of analysis by the System, then maybe that System really is doomed.

So too we see ideas from the intellectual fringe informing these increasingly powerful political movements. Some of these movements use social Darwinist ideas to claim, for instance, that public welfare is undercut by immigration. 

Err, that diversity damages social cohesion has been shown by academics on both the Left (e.g., Putnam) and the Right (e.g., Salter). It has nothing to do with “social Darwinism” you insufferable pompous jackass.

In Europe, the normalisation of nationalist groups such as the one supporting Éric Zemmour’s bid for the French presidency, or Viktor Orbán’s Fidesz Party in Hungary, is threatening established political norms. 

Ah yes, the crazy idea that demographic majorities (particularly indigenous ones!) have the right to resist dispossession is what is threatening established political norms. Well, if true, then those established political norms” deserve to be threatened.

In the United Kingdom, some advocates of Brexit have translated traditional English exceptionalism into a form of hypernationalism in terms that, like those of the former US president Donald Trump’s supporters, echo social Darwinist doctrines. 

Huh?  Brexit has essentially replaced Polish plumbers with more Paki and Negro immigrants, so I’m not sure what kind of “hypernationalism” exists in a country in which indigenous British are jailed for mean tweets about Colored invaders.

The prevalence of belief in lies, such as the lie…

Lie?

…that Trump won the 2020 election, is evocative of the universe of false assumptions that spread in Germany during Hitler’s rise to power. 

What false assumptions?

To combat the fissures that election lies…

Lies?

…immigration fantasies…

Fantasies? I suppose demographic change is a “fantasy” except when the Left wants to celebrate it and/or use the resultant “diversity” as an excuse to pass more Orwellian laws to suppress majority rights.

…or antivaccination movements…

I oppose such movements, but the lack of faith in the System over other issues (e.g., immigration) helps empower that nonsense.

…represent, Western governments should recognise that the prevalence of fringe thinking is a sign that they are failing.

True.

The path to restoring faith – which could lead through the sort of disruption that has preserved societies in the past – will offer real help to those who have been left behind. 

Yes, except when those “left behind” are White majority members “left behind” because of mass immigration and multiculturalism – then we should label that as “lies” and instead “restore faith” by focusing on relatively irrelevant issues that are NOT the prime concern leading to the loss of faith, right, Potter, you mendacious hypocrite?  Again, Potter fails miserably. He is so blinded by his political biases that his analysis is worthless.

On the other hand, a sane and effective Far Right could restore faith by replacing the failed System with something different. Within dissident rightist politics, particularly in America, those left behind – sane and rational people, White ethnics, STEM people, pan-Europeanists, Futurists, etc. – could find new faith in a New Movement, and the Sallis Groupuscle exists to help find the way to that New Movement. In order to solve a problem, one has to properly identify that problem, and have the will and ability to do it.  Potter cannot even identify the real problems.  We must do better.

The underlying principle of liberal democracy is the contract between government and the governed. 

Does “the governed” include White people?

Government has a responsibility to reign in corporate power that undermines public welfare and spreads falsehood, just as it has a responsibility to ensure that people have access to the goods and services they need. 

Government also has a responsibility to safeguard ethnic genetic (and other) interests, particularly for majority members.  What does Potter have to say about that?

This will require practices very different from ‘politics as normal’. It is a critical lesson from history that, when normality fails, change will come.

Yes, my dear Potter, but one must identify WHY “normality fails.” You, so blinded by your prejudices, so immersed in your leftist milieu, are unable to do so.

The signs are that we’re in a time that is ripe for disruption. But what sort will it be?

The signs demonstrate that there are unprecedented opportunities for Der Movement, which makes its unending manifest failures even more stark and pathetic. What about changes within White racial nationalism?  The same may apply eventually, but Der Movement and its followers are so used to failure, that it would take something radically catastrophic to open up the possibility of change. In both cases, the dissident forces need to develop ideas that can step in to replace those that others have lost faith it, need effective coherent leadership, and need to exacerbate disruption to open niche space for the new ideas and leaders. Given Suvorov’s Law, making the dominant entities believe that they can survive through moderation and compromise will be helpful in eventually overthrowing those entities. Given the current hostility of the dominant entities for the dissidents, the dominant entities will need to get more desperate before they are willing to take the chance. Dissidents can promote that desperation by causing as much societal disruption as possible while maintaining themselves as a viable ideological alternative.  Eventually, the temptation to try and save themselves by importing aspects of that alternative may prove too much for the dominant entities to resist. Then - contra Potter - that will destroy them.

Later essays here will explore how a dissident Far Right Groupuscule can form a nucleus to effectively take on Der Movement.

Der Movement with the Mask Off

Derangement revealed.

One positive outcome of the covid pandemic is that is has ripped the mask off of Der Movement and we can all observe the deranged, retarded, drooling face of utter intellectual and moral vacuity thus revealed.  If the Nordicism, ethnic fetishism, esoteric traditionalism, Hitler worship, HBD, conspiracy theorizing, and all the rest wasn't enough, Der Movement's response to covid, and, in particular, the covid vaccination, has exposed the degenerated rot of the "movement" for all to see. "Normies" are repulsed, STEM people alienated, and the asocial Luddite derangement of "movement" "leaders" and "activists" can now be adequately studied with proper and focused scrutiny.

Imagine if an asteroid or comet is discovered on a collision course with the Earth. What would be Der Movement's "take" on that? Let's see. It is all a hoax, a conspiracy to take away our freedoms (e.g., the freedom to have Negro drug dealers move next door). Any plan to divert the impact with a nuclear weapon would be to poison us and change our DNA with radioactive toxins; alternatively we'll be told that outer space does not exist and that nuclear weapons are actually napalm and mustard gas. Anyone who objects to "movement" derangement would be labeled as "naive" and a "tool of the System." As the asteroid or comet is entering the Earth's atmosphere and collision is imminent, the last moments of "activists" would be to type away on Gab, or at Counter-Currents, that the big thing in the sky is actually a hologram, devised by dastardly "Jew astronomers."

Der Movement is the Dunning-Kruger effect writ large.  Maybe "movement" heroes should understand what they are talking about before gibbering stupidities.

Der Movement must be utterly destroyed. It has unmasked itself as a pernicious blot, a festering stain, on White racial nationalism. A New Movement requires the niche space that will be opened by Der Movement's necessary obliteration.

The mainstream Right has, of course, discredited itself in equal measure - now they cry "my body my choice" against the vaccine.

Great. My body my choice - so, we can have physician assisted suicide for people with incurable diseases? Or is that against Christianity?

Can I choose who I associate with? Or do I have to be forced to live amongst Coloreds?

Can I choose who I go to school with? Or are the schools integrated by law?

If there's a military draft, can men refuse?

Can the mendacity and hypocrisy of Der Right be believed?

More on Dickie Spinster

Spencer.

[Note: "Dickie Spinster" comes from this book review]

Briefly following up on this, what lessons can be learned?

For the American rank-and-file - your "leaders" are essentially meritless affirmative action cases who have led you from one disaster to another; they all criticize each other, but one Quota Queen is as bad as the next.  And your "movement" is a complete catastrophe.

What lessons can be learned for individuals who wish to rise to leadership in dissident politics?  Basing your rise on actual merit rather than ethnic quotas would help, as the latter approach eventually leads to disaster as one hits the wall of their limitations. Speaking of which, remember the Clint Eastwood Magnum Force movie phrase -  "a man's got to know his limitations." Rather than being head of NPI, or any other sort of Grand Poobah in Der Movement, Spencer would have been best suited as a spokesman or political candidate - the "face" of the "movement" representing the older and more experienced Quota Queens (who, although inept as well, relatively speaking are bit more wise and more prudent) who could have told him what to do and say.  But if you have the attitude that people need to "bend their knee" to you, obviously such a secondary role would not be personally acceptable.

If you want to follow the strategy of emphasizing networking rather than content creation, then it is (obviously) imperative to cultivate, and not alienate, your most influential contacts and supporters. The ultimate problem with Hailgate was not the incident itself - which I thought was, while unfortunate and reflecting poor judgment, not the sort of catastrophe others made it out to be - but the inevitable, easily expected, reaction of people like Taylor and Brimelow. Losing - at least publicly - their support, coupled with the feud with Johnson (which we really cannot blame Spencer for since Johnson eventually ends up feuding with almost everyone), left Spencer with a limited number of networking options, many of them sub-optimal. The collapse of the Alt Right corporation led to more "breaks" in his networking, and other various events led to problems with Conte, Kessler, etc. 

Johnson can survive his many feuds and catastrophes because he is a content creator (if you like what he produces, which I do not), and manages a stable of other content creators. Johnson, despite his propensity for feuding, is fairly good at networking and "movement" politics (to the extent that he can control his tropism for fighting and feuding).  Spencer, it seems, lacks these skills as well as not being a significant content creator. In summary, if you put most of your eggs in the networking basket, you had better be sure your behavior doesn't smash those eggs.

Needless to say, if you are going to be a high-publicity leader, you need to control your personal behavior to limit scandal and to create an image of prudence and probity. Obviously, that's not what happened in Spencer's case, but to be fair, some of Spencer's Quota Queen critics are not any better in this regard.  Two wrongs do not make a right, however.

And, of course, sound judgment, good strategy and tactics, operational security, etc. are all important to build confidence so as to be accepted as a leader and to maintain that position. Seriousness is also crucial; the Beavis-and-Butthead aspects of the Alt Right may have been plenty of fun for its participants at the time, but how can you build and maintain a network of influential contacts and supporters if you behave like a juvenile jackass? And if you want loyalty from supporters you need to give loyalty back - and this inability is a fundamental and fatal flaw for almost all of the Quota Queens.

There's more to be said on this issue, but that is enough for now.

Nordicist Confessions Part II

More on this issue.

Following up on this, Nordicist Confessions writes:

It is my belief that Southern and Eastern Europeans, and non-whites more broadly, should allow Nordicists to create their own "safe spaces" (online and in the real world) in their efforts to build subracial camaraderie and preserve their kind. I also encourage them to form their own communities, similar to libertarians, in numerous places around the world. While legally they may not be permitted to establish Nordic-only societies, they can create a culture that is sufficiently hostile to non-Nordics that it will discourage non-Nordics from joining these communities. 

I essentially agree; I support freedom of association. One note of complaint is the conflation of “Southern and Eastern Europeans” and “non-whites more broadly” with respect to this issue. Let us consider how non-Whites approach association with Whites. No matter how much they proclaim how much they hate Whites, Coloreds constantly force themselves on the Whites they despise. Enforced racial integration is done to benefit non-Whites and when White Flight occurs, Coloreds (eventually) always follow. In contrast, Southern and Eastern Europeans were content to live in their urban “ethnic enclaves” (as Nordicists called them) and were forced out by the racial integration promoted by the Anglo-Jewish alliance. It was not that White ethnics were clamoring to live in Nordic areas but that they were desperate to escape from Blacks and Hispanics. Note that it are Somalis invading Maine and Minnesota, not Italian-Americans.  

The problem is we rarely see any serious efforts toward building such a community. Instead, what we find, in addition to the typical online whining, is these men (typically they are men) and/or their ideological kin (especially in the broader White Nationalist movement) breeding with non-Nordics, and very commonly with East Asian women (the list of such examples is long, as you have detailed previously). 

True.

So, contrary to the beliefs of Nordicists, it is not Southern Europeans and others stopping them from having their own ethnostate - it is "leaders" of their racial movement(s) pairing up with non-Nordic women, similar to how some Southern preachers condemn homosexuality while procuring the services of young male prostitutes on the downlow. Like with the black community, these people are their own worst enemy and should stop blaming others for their passivity, inaction, and blatant contradictions.

Equally true.

You have a point that Nordicists specifically are not seen with Asian women, at least openly, perhaps because they are even more controversial than the already-controversial White Nationalists and thus make a greater effort to remain anonymous. However, even you have noted how outraged they seem to be over some intra-European pairings while simultaneously mum - and at times even encouraging - racial-nationalists who are with or who have dated non-Nordic women, including East Asian women. 

That is absolutely true. Rosie and the Kids White Nationalism is in part a creation of Nordicists and those allied with Nordicists (i.e., HBD "race realists," ethnonationalists, Amnats, etc.).

The tell here as in poker is the *silence* with the latter. Why do we rarely see Nordicist men complaining about Nordic men breeding with East Asian women? Their silence implies there is more than just a desire for preservation going on. 

True.

My hypothesis stands: these are generally low-t men concerned about biological competition generally, not only from racial outsiders but also from Nordic alpha males who eat them alive and give no fucks. As Luimarco says: "On a daily, brah!"

That might be going too far; there are some legitimate preservationist concerns and not everything can be ascribed to sexual anxieties and testosterone levels; that is much too reductionist.

Yes, this is a part of it, and why non-Nordics should not join the White Nationalist movement: the movement is undergirded by these concerns, which the surface hostility actually serves to mask (unfortunately). 

It depends what you define as “the White Nationalist movement.” If what you mean is Der Movement, Inc. (a money-making enterprise), then I wholeheartedly agree and that is what I have been preaching. If what you mean is White nationalism in general, then I completely and vehemently disagree. Non-Nordic Europeans have just as much right to engage in pro-White activism as do Nordics, and White ethnics should not be driven out of racial activism (in its broad sense) just like they allowed themselves to be driven out of their old neighborhoods (and by similar forces – back then by the Anglo-Jewish alliance and today by HBDers and Nordicists with some connections of Jews and Jewish interests). As a pan-European racial nationalist, I see that, in the end, it is The West Against The Rest, and all Europeans need to stand together for their mutual interests

It would be rather noble for some Nordicists to openly address these points, but that would clearly show some vulnerability on their end. One solution to this problem, again, is to openly separate themselves as I mentioned above, but we see no serious efforts on their part with this (online whining does not count). Again, we also have to face a possibly bigger problem: their silence when Nordic men breed with non-Nordic and especially East Asian women. We are thus back to square one, despite this hypothetical concern we both have noted that appears to partly motivate them.

Well, yes, Sallis is blacklisted and Derbyshire is worshipped. So, I can’t argue with that’s written there.

But it makes no sense to enforce or abide by a multiparty agreement (in theory) unilaterally. If members of the EU and EEA (from all parts) are freely moving around, why impose a restriction on yourself not to move to other territories? Sure, you can restrain yourself as a matter of principle, but this would be of no practical significance *if other parties are ignoring your wishes that they remain in their place*. While Nordicists whine about non-Nordic people moving into their lands, they rarely condemn Nordics who settle into other parts of Europe (which may indicate they are oblivious to the actual politics and culture of Europe). With no offense intended, this is a principled stance that only low-t men would take.

You are completely misunderstanding what I wrote in my essay on this point. I’m not advocating some sort of “unilateral disarmament” with respect to intra-European migration. It would be enforced and would apply to everyone equally.  This is no “principled low-t stance.”  I object to people like John Morgan living in Hungary and the hypocrisy of Nords complaining about non-Nordic Europeans immigrating to Northern Europe while Nords colonize Spain, Italy, Southern France, Bulgaria, etc.

It's obvious at least anecdotally that such pairings are common between Nord men and Med women. However, once again, you don't see Nordicists condemning White Nationalists like Stefan Molyneux or Richard Spencer (whose wife is a quarter Georgian) who engage in these pairings. 

We need to be careful with terms like “Med” and who is included.  But I see your major point, which stands.

They also remain silent when White Nationalists pair up with East Asian and in some cases mestiza women (or in the case of Gavin McInnes, Native American women). They do not seem to protest when Michelle Malkin gets a standing ovation at an American Renaissance conference (did this actually happen?... It's what you wrote I believe). 

That’s what I was told.  See this.

Mrs. Malkin brought the audience to its feet…

Back to Nordicist Confessions:

Again, while concerns about genetic annihilation may be a factor, it's obviously a complex issue with perhaps multiple motives.

Yes.

Here's another big problem: Nordic European nations generally have no interest in taking in subracially Nordic Americans who cannot provide proof of direct lineage to these countries. This is not a problem caused by non-Nordics, but again Nordicists fail to address this issue. If the Nordic subrace is so important to preserve, then it stands to reason that these high-IQ nations would see the value in accepting Nordicist Americans. Generally, they don't. They don't see the value in accepting working-class Americans (which most Nordicists are) who throw online fits. This is reality, verified by actual EU and non-EU member laws posted online. Most American Nordicists can only spend 90 days max in Nordic countries. Then they will get kicked out. They may get upset with you for posting this, but you did not create this rule. I did not either.

OK.  But if some of these Americans are ethnic hybrids, then the nations have a right to reject them. Now, they may also reject ethnically pure Americans, but there are also cultural issues, I suppose. Americans in general are not very popular among significant portions of the European population (at least that is my impression).

If James Bowery, the author of the infamous essay arguing that Nordic men are prone to getting ass-raped in prison and are subliminally castrated by more dominant non-Nordic males, is the best among modern Nordicists, the movement has a serious problem. Again, and perhaps I will cover this in more detail in the future, there will always be issues with movements - or organizations generally - dominated by low-t men, whatever their IQs. Low-t men are not good leaders, and the ideas that flow from their heads are likely to be similarly eunuchoid and uninspiring (even embarrassing). You need to combine a high IQ with at least a moderate amount of testosterone to achieve the New Man you discussed and that would actually inspire "normie" men. Normie men want to be Luka Doncic (a Balkan Nordic with significant EEF ancestry), not James Bowery. Weak men are not respected.

I actually like some of the material Bowery has written (obviously not all of it, as I have made clear), and prison rape is a serious problem. I tend to doubt that it is a problem only for Nords however.

In summary, I think that non-Nordicist Nords and non-Nordic Europeans need to together build a New Movement. The problems in the Old Movement seem to me intractable. Thus, my objective is to deconstruct the Old Movement and promote the construction of the New Movement.

The Death of American White Nationalism

It was murder.

And what rough beast, its hour come round at last,

    Slouches towards Bethlehem to be born? - Yeats

In this post, I will make the argument that American White nationalism, as we have known it, is dead (and if not yet dead, certainly dying). Further, I will propose that in the place of genuine White nationalism, the American “movement” is birthing a grotesque, monstrous "rough beast” of aracial civic nationalist populism, with fringe elements of HBD, Nordicism, HBD-Nordicism, traditionalism, and anything else that can be pulled out of the memetic sewer. This is being done not only to drive a stake through the heart of White nationalism, but to prevent the rank-and-file from recognizing the death of their ideology, so they stay with Der Movement and do not move on to something new and better.

Before I proceed, I want to once again make a distinction between Der Movement, which I despise and oppose, and White nationalism, which I support.  Der Movement is (or should be) a means to an end, while White nationalism is the end for which the “movement” is supposedly the means. So, one can strongly be supportive of an end, a goal, an objective, while being vehemently opposed to how that objective is currently being worked toward; they can oppose the means used to achieve their desired end. Thus, I would welcome the death of Der Movement (which can’t come soon enough), but I view with great dismay the death of American White nationalism. 

And please note that the death of American White nationalism would not mean the death of Der Movement, oh no, because Der Movement has been evolving into something quite different from being a vehicle for White nationalism. Indeed, this evolution is in large part responsible for the death – the murder – of American White nationalism. That is because the ideology of White nationalism in America became so strongly entangled with Der Movement that it became completely dependent upon it (similar to the relationship between American conservatism and the Republican Party). I warned American White nationalists to cut ties with Der Movement before it was too late, and to help build a New Movement, but no one listened. So, let us now survey the ruins of American White nationalism.

I want to make clear here that I am not really referring to the endless failure of Der Movement; again, it is the “movement’s” increasing abandonment of White nationalism that is the issue in this essay, not the failures of Der Movement itself.  

I have previously discussed this issue here.  I noted this Counter-Currents comment:

There is a broad trend on the Right now to move ever more towards meta; film reviews, music, analysis of other people in the movement (which was mentioned critically in a comment on the podcast article about America First), philosophy, based Christianity and paganism, while some of our people are even saying that race and the JQ are passé, old news, WN 1.5 or something. I’ve even heard people apparently in our circles say we need to be less ‘about race’.

And made these comments:

That is consistent with my critiques of the current “movement” as being more about HBD “race realism” or “traditionalism” or “America First” civic nationalist Trumpian right-wing populism and the “big tent” as well as focusing on narrower intra-racial distinctions such as Nordicism and/or ethnonationalism, instead of being about broad-based White nationalism. MacDonald’s turn to HBD-Nordicism, and away from the JQ, is part of this, and the whole abandonment of hardcore racial nationalism and the emphasis on “meta” and “mainstreaming” makes the remains of the “movement” ever more congenial for the likes of Filipina (married to a Jew) Malkin and former illegal alien (HBDer married to a Chinatrix) Derbyshire.

This issue has continued to develop; the rot within the “movement” has continued to spread. The attacks against White nationalism from Affirmative Right led to this Counter-Currents article. Of particular interest is the following comment excerpt:

Are Americans inherently averted to ethnocentrism? I’d say yes. In general. My suggestion, to preserve a modicum of the traditional values, to combat Globalist neoLiberal ideology is to build a populist conservative coalition with non-whites: Something like the Brasilian Integralist movement of Plinio Asado. The U.S. is a bi-racial multi-ethnic country – unlike ex-Yugoslavia where ethnic lines were clearly defined (more or less in Bosnia). I believe that would be a more successful long term approach for the reality “on the ground”

So, the argument coming from "movement" commentators is now one in favor of multiracial conservative populism. If one looks at American Renaissance (Amren), besides the steady stream of Asian supremacist comments, one finds in the comments sections things like the following:

Personally I don't have any special preference for whites...I don't believe in some situation where we strongly favor the ingroup and toss people aside who are the outgroup.

There you go. That is consistent with all of the non-Whites, including “Black conservatives,” that you see on FOX News, consistent with the “We’re all God’s Children” civic nationalism of Gab, consistent with the big tent multiracialism of the Alt Lite, America First, multiracial Amnats, HBD race realism, all of it. And why should you be surprised by that comment from Counter-Currents, or that from Amren, when "movement" "leader" Greg Johnson of Counter-Currents himself endorsed a multiracial future for “ethnonationalist” “White” states? We must save 10% of our population niche for “Rosie and the kids,” don’t you know. Meanwhile, Amren self-describes as "yellow supremacist."  That's what passes for "White nationalism" or "White advocacy" in the year 2021.

The signs and portents of the death of American White nationalism are all around you. Lawrence and Affirmative Right attack the very foundations of a rational, scientific White nationalism. Counter-Currents promotes multiracialism and tries to redefine White nationalism as simply a grouping of different traditional European ethnic nationalisms.  Non-Whites are not only valued commentators at FOX News – which is expected from cuckservatives – but in Der Movement itself (e.g., Lipton Matthews, Michelle Malkin, Amren Jews). MacDonald switches from the JQ to HBD-Nordicism. Movie reviews and “metapolitical content” combined with bizarre esoteric traditionalism replaces a serious political movement for White survival. HBD race realism replaces kinship-based racial nationalism and we have leading “White advocates” making blanket statements in favor of Asian racial superiority.  A race-mixer like Derbyshire is not only tolerated in Der Movement but gets to peddle his “Arctic Alliance” trash at “movement” conferences. Instead of On Genetic Interests and Imperium we are "blessed" with The Homo and the Negro and My Nationalist Pony. According to Counter-Currents, we should not use the term "White race" anymore. This is all simply astonishing. We have a dead American White nationalist ideology for a dead American nation.

This was very predictable, and I indeed did predict it, once HBD became entrenched in Der Movement. HBD and authentic White nationalism are in constant conflict, the former being aracial cognitive elitism and IQ nationalism that elevates Jews and Asians at the top of a ranking of certain phenotypic traits, while the latter is kinship-oriented with an ingroup based on genetic similarity and on shared ancestry, as well as on a shared civilizational background. Despite my warnings, the HBD cancer spread, metastasizing through the “movement,” destroying the healthy memetic tissue of racial loyalty. When Amren focuses on HBD and harps about Asian superiority and invites Jews, Filipinas, and race-mixers as honored speakers, then White nationalism dies. When activists engage in divisive Nordicism, White nationalism dies. And when the two - HBD and Nordicism - are combined into HBD-Nordicism, ideological death is certain. HBD was always about opposing White nationalism, particularly pan-Europeanism (remember GNXP in the early 2000s?) and so the marriage of HBD with Nordicism, another deadly enemy of pan-Europeanism, was inevitable. What did activists expect when they accepted the HBD poison into the “movement” system?

The GNXP wing of HBD was always all about that “Razib and Godless Capitalist” must be allowed to live in America; the Amren-VDARE wing was always all about that “Rosie and the kids” must be allowed to live in America. But I for one do NOT want to live in the same polity with any of those individuals, and I cannot understand any so-called “pro-White activist” who would agree to such an outcome for racial activism.  We may as well just agree with Michael Hart’s multiracial “White separatist state” that would exclude only Blacks – but, no wait, we need to include Blacks in our coalition as well. Hart was indeed prescient when he ditched his multiracial “White separatism” for completely aracial conservatism. And, of course, when THE JEW speaks, the HBD-Nordicist-ethnonationalist alliance listens, and the lapdogs eventually follow suit, as they are in fact doing. Very “integralist” it all is!  Cultural nationalism!  After all, we can’t leave out the likes of Lipton Matthews or Jayman now, can we?  Again: It all conflates to the FOX News/Gab “We’re all God’s children” model of aracial civic nationalism. That’s Trumpism, that’s the big tent “right-wing populism,” tinged with a bit of (ironically, elitist) aracial HBD cognitive elitism. Old School White nationalism is passé – “cave man nationalism” as Trad Vlad would say. Out with the old, in with the new – Color, Color everywhere.  “Rosie and the kids!”  After all, the scorn for WN 1.0 and the embrace of WN 2.0 or WN 3.0 was a signal that the Quota Queens were jettisoning actual White nationalism for something fundamentally different.

And so we are left with an utterly transformed "movement." The HBD poison was allowed in. Everything else – the Alt Right fiasco, traditionalist cul-de-sacs, the multiracial Alt Lite-Amnat-American First Trumpian “big tent,” obsessions with mainstreaming (which never extended, interestingly enough, to reaching out to White ethnics, nor led to a realization that “normies” are repulsed by “movement” nonsense and don’t care about HBD or Savitri Devi) – all of that followed. HBD entered a “movement” body already weakened by the infections of Nordicism and traditionalism, and then the HBD cancer so weakened Der Movement that all of these other opportunistic infections and infestations found a warm and cozy home. Until of course all of this nonsense kills the host, at which point the infestations mimic the host and try to convince everyone that the host still lives (as a ghost or zombie, I suppose, but the parasites make believe that the host is still alive and healthy). And of course, just like fungi sprout in decaying organic material, all of the money-grubbing grifters emerge from the corpse of American White nationalism. The decaying cadaver of an authentic ideology makes fertile ground indeed for all sorts of noxious mushrooms.

What we have instead of genuine American White nationalism is HBD race realism, multiracial right-wing populist conservatism, Trump worship, traditionalism, conspiracy theorizing, “We’re all God’s Children” Christianity, lunatic fringe Nordicism and ethnic fetishism – everything and anything except good old basic (pan-European) White racial nationalism.

Now, one may think that this situation gives new hope for a New Movement – if Der Movement abandons hardcore White nationalism, won’t White nationalists have to look somewhere else?  But it is not that simple. Der Movement and its "leaders" are not honest enough, or stupid enough, to openly declare their break with White nationalism. Indeed, many of them will continue to publicly identify with White nationalism and deny that any break exists. They will simply transform and evolve “White nationalism” into something at odds with itself, a grotesque multiracial abomination with no connection to authentic White nationalism, while continuing to call it “White nationalism” and tricking the rubes into going along. They have a history of doing so. Look how Greg Johnson repeatedly tries to redefine White nationalism away from its “Our Race Is Our Nation” core into being merely a constellation of loosely aligned individual petty nationalisms. And many naïve and conformist activists buy into it, being cognitively unable to discern the transparently obvious and dishonest memetic sleight-of-hand involved (similarly, within Der Movement, “pan-Europeanism” has been distorted into a surface veneer for Nordicism, Pierce and the National Alliance come to mind). So one cannot be sanguine that a New Movement will benefit from the Old Movement's de facto abandonment of its core principles. People too often value style over substance; they consider labels to be more important that the thing itself. As long as you have Quota Queens pretending to represent the ghost of American White nationalism, then there will be fools who’ll think that Michelle Malkin, Amren Jews, and “Rosie and the kids” are somehow representative of a “new” “White nationalism.” Only those who are rational logical thinkers, who see things as they really are and who discern reality, will understand the need for a New Movement, and will recognize the open niche space left after Der Movement abandons core White nationalist beliefs.

American White nationalism did not die a natural death, it was murdered. American White nationalism is being erased with malice aforethought. That the grifters may maintain a fig leaf cover of a “White nationalist” label for the monstrosity they are birthing doesn’t matter. The “rough beast” of aracial HBD civic nationalism (posing as White nationalism) is coming, thanks to your failed meritless affirmative action Quota Queen “leadership.”

Addendum

Frank Salter gave to the “movement” the gift of a coherent biopolitical paradigm, through a book – On Genetic Interests – that wove together rational science, politics, and ethics to provide one of the two main pillars of sane racial nationalism – the biopolitical perspective, which when combined with the High Culture second pillar, helps to construct an edifice that has lasting power.

But the stupid “movement” basically threw it away, rejected this gift, with the “movement’s” combination of irrationality, hostility to real science, ignorance, naiveté with respect to the HBD cult, and all-around obstinacy and stupidity.  The “movement’s" poor reception of Salter’s work is probably the biggest disappointment I’ve had in the “movement” – after all, I always knew Nordicism was a serious problem, but I didn’t suspect that the “movement” is composed of people so abysmally stupid and stubborn that the simple “we have interests in co-ethnics who are genetically more similar to us than are non-ethnics” reality is questioned and in some cases rejected.

The pieces fit together. Ditching authentic White nationalism means ditching kinship-based ingroups in favor of other constellations of individuals – the IQ nationalism of HBD race realism, religious cultural nationalism and multiracial civic nationalism, big tent Trumpian right-wing populism and color-blind conservatism. For that to succeed, paradigms based on racial and ethnic kinship – such as EGI – must be rejected.  After all, if you accept genetic kinship, and the interests derived therefrom, as a paramount concern, then that endangers the status of Jews and Asians.  And we certainly can’t have that!