Odds and Ends, 5/8/22

In der news.

Happy Mother’s Day!

Listen and enjoy!

Supporting my thesis that Der Movement is hostile to Southern and Eastern Europeans, let's consider prominent White ethnics in Der Movement. I will include in this survey people of part-NWE ancestry, like Scutari and Conte, but will exclude the part-Mexican Fuentes, people in the Alt Lite (Fuentes again) - that is NOT Der Movement, I will also exclude Enoch given the controversy of whether he is Jewish. I am only considering people who have contributed significantly in leadership, intellectual and ideology, significant action, etc. - I'm not interested in random skinheads or some commentator on blog threads. I will include Burdi, as Wikipedia claims he is Italian-Ukrainian (not Armenian as others have claimed). I'm focusing on America here.

In the 60s-80s we had Patler who was convicted of killing Rockwell and spent time in prison- Patler had been racially critiqued by the Pierce brigade. Tommasi was murdered. Scutari is still in prison (and the book The Silent Brotherhood chronicled Nordicist complaints about him). That guy who did Nick's Observations for Pierce in the 1970s apparently dropped out.

More recently, there is me -I'm still very much involved in activism but am doing my own thing and am openly hostile to Der Movement and its leaders. Torriani who joined me in critiquing McCulloch in TOQ insofar as I know stopped involvement long ago. Polignano is apparently inactive. Burdi famously dropped out but has recently been making noises of interest once again but doesn't seem to be actually doing anything. Frank Borzellieri suffered from social pricing persecution, but, unlike Sam Francis or John Derbyshire, never received the sort of support (surprise!) that would have enabled him to effectively deal with the fall-out from the persecution. Insofar as I know, Borzellieri is not currently active in the "movement." Conte apparently is involved with the National Justice Party (after his falling out with Spencer). So - what? So we have Sallis who despises Der Movement and wants it destroyed and whatever Conte is doing. Did I miss anyone?

That's it with all of the tens of millions of Southern and Eastern Europeans in the country. What does that tell you?

Laugh at this.

Francis’ friends also did the right thing, by pulling together to offer the patronage necessary for him to ride out the financial setback of losing his job.

Same as with Derbyshire. How did that work out for Frank Borzellieri?  What’s the difference, I wonder?

…he played a leading role in the foundation of the Occidental Quarterly and the National Policy Institute.

Shall we discuss Johnson’s performance with TOQ and Spencer’s with NPI?  All together now….affirmative action.

I first encountered Sam Francis’ writings in the late 1980s, and as I moved away from juvenile libertarianism…

It seems to me that every single “leader” who came to Der Movement via libertarianism has been an utter catastrophe.  Does that suggest a serious character flaw in people who take libertarianism seriously?

I first met Sam in 2001 at a Council of Conservative Citizens event in North Carolina, where Sam Dickson introduced me to both Sam and Jared Taylor.

Once again…as soon as Johnson became involved in Der Movement, virtually IMMEDIATELY, he was hobnobbing with the likes of Jared Taylor and Sam Francis.  All together now….affirmative action.

The last time we spoke, I congratulated him on quitting smoking and losing weight, which I took as his resolution to stay with us for the long haul.

Didn’t work out too well, huh?

I had particularly high hopes for the National Policy Institute, which was to be his platform.

And Spencer ran it into the ground. Please remind me what qualifications he had to be put in charge of that?  All together now….affirmative action.

To get a better understanding of Counter-Currents as an anti-Italian and anti-White ethnic entity, see this comment by one of their authors. Now, look at the content of the link the moron provided but obviously either did not read fully or dishonestly cherrypicked from:

Her mother was of Irish, German, and remote mixed African American descent.

The Black ancestry was from her MOTHER’S side of the family.  This is discussed more here.

Counter-Currents is so radically anti-Italian that their authors/commentators resort to open distortion of facts to smear groups like Sicilian as “Black” and supports my contention that the ultimate reason for the Bavaria article is to once again stir up the “Sicilians are Black” and “Italians are non-White” canards – in other words, promoting anti-Italian memes transparently disguised as an effort to “expose” those memes.

Thus, once again, the naked ethnic aggression of Counter-Currents is revealed. Italians and other White ethnics need to recognize Counter-Currents as their unrelenting foe.

This is Counter-Currents:

Lord ShangMay 5, 2022 at 4:33 am

I was just thinking of him when reading this piece. “Big Pussy Bonpensiero”, or something like that. Dude does NOT look white as I do, Trump does, etc. Italy has long been thought of as a biracial nation. Maybe not like Obama, but there are pronounced differences between the whiter, more productive and honest Northerners, and the less visibly white, less productive and more criminal Southerners. I long ago knew a young guy whose ancestors were all from the Italian “boot heel”. Even another classmate of ours initially thought this guy was Hispanic.

Notice how the ethnic aggression is always one-sided and always unprovoked. Imagine some American wop who is a reader and supporter of Counter-Currents. Perhaps they give D'Nations and go through the paywall. They mind their business, reading the content and contributing to the fundraising. Very well. What next?

They find Goad routinely questioning whether Italians are White. They read pieces saying that Italians are runty Morlocks, akin to penned up chickens. They read Counter-Currents commentators who mock Italian names, or claim that Italy is a "biracial nation" with a non-White criminal southern half (where most Italian-Americans derive from). They read Counter-Currents commentators imply that a woman with a Southron mixed-race, part-Black mother looks strange because of that woman's normal-looking Italo-Sicilian father. They see someone named "Bavaria" writing an article on perceptions of Sicilians being "Black," provoking some of the aforementioned comments as well as mendacious misinterpretations of population genetics to further defame Italians. And all through this, Italian readers of Counter-Currents are not attacking any other group and are in fact constantly "blindsided" by this unrelenting ethnic aggression.

Any White ethnics, particularly Italians, who support Counter-Currents, or any other "movement" outlet, are, in my opinion, mentally ill.

The whole Counter-Currents anti-Italian hostility issue perfectly supports my contentions about Der Movement's ethnic affirmative action program. If there is a large faction of Der Movement that questions the "whiteness" of Italians, then it stands to reason that an Italian-American would not be viable as a "movement" leader, regardless of how qualified they are. Merit means nothing. On the other hand, the NW Euro Quota Queens, particularly "WASP" types, are elevated to leadership with no significant qualifications and maintain their status despite lurching from one catastrophe to another. Again, merit means nothing. Therefore, I am correct.

WASPs are trusting souls. For that very reason they can be exploited easily by those who promise one thing and do another. … Mass Third World immigration imposes enormous risks upon Anglo-Saxon societies grounded in unique patterns of trusting behavior that evolved over many centuries. If newcomers do not accept the burdens entailed by the civic culture of the host society—most notably the need to forswear one’s pre-existing racial, ethnic and religious allegiances—they are bound to reduce the benefits of good citizenship for the host Anglo-Saxon nation. (Andrew Fraser, The WASP Question (Arktos, 2011), 57, 64)

There is so much wrong with that Fraser quote that one doesn't know where to start. WASP dispossession was in large part mediated by WASPs themselves. Putting aside the 19th century abolitionist insanity and moving to the 20th century, at some point WASPs concluded that they couldn't beat the Jews and decided - at least the "Yankee" WASPs so decided - to throw their lot in with Jews (and Blacks) and salvage as much as their position as they could (e.g., by delaying White ethnic upward mobility). Then we can ask - for those immigrants who did assimilate, like the White ethnics, how were and are they treated? Answer: Actually worse than the Colored pets that WASPs seem to love so much. If you get punished for "good citizenship" and are rewarded for being ethnocentric Jews and Coloreds, well...guess what happens? More bad behavior. Moving to the WASP forebears in Britain, it was Yockey who said that the defining characteristic of British foreign policy was the use of (fundamentally dishonest) cant. And how do WASPs/British behave when they live in other people's nations? How's Morgan, Munro, and Gullick doing these days?

Odds and Ends, 3/15/22

In der news.

Happy March 15th.

See this.  I promote truth and facts, not dogmatic narratives. In that spirit, I share this Campbell video. It does give some support to those who have been hysterical about the covid vaccines. However, this needs to be put into the perspective of morbidity and mortality from covid itself. It would seem that with Omicron being mild, they should stop pushing endless vaccination. Further, stop with the young people. Older people like myself are a different story (although as I sort through my health issues, it will be interesting to determine, if possible, if the metabolic issues are vaccine-derived. The surgical ones are not).

Where I differ from others is that I rightly pin the blame where it ultimately belongs – China and the Chinese. That doesn't take Big Pharma off the hook. That needs to be addressed. But none of this would have happened if the HBD Gods were not as filthy and utterly incompetent as any possible Negro.

Problems with the covid mRNA vaccines are not due to "DNA being changed" and is unlikely to be due to any inherent problems with the mRNA vaccine concept. Instead, it is likely due to immune responses to high levels of the (modified) covid spike protein antigen, especially with repeated exposures. However, given that covid doesn't seem to cause a very strong, long-lasting immune response, I'm not sure if the vaccines would have been effective if they were "weaker."

We should not let the (possible - probable?) bizarre inter-racial sexual preferences and deviances of White male HBDers deflect us from pinning the blame on the ethny of disease and death the Chinese.

Gaslighting Greg:

Our biggest project this year, however, is creating an entirely new institution: a think tank that will propose concrete policies to halt and reverse the negative consequences of globalization and multiculturalism. This is an enormous, long-term project which is taking most of my time.

This has to rank among the most alarming developments of all my time in pro-White activism. if this "think tank" promotes the failed and wrong ideas of Counter-Currents, and if it displays the same lack of judgment as Greggy and his pitiful crew of imbecilic sycophants, then it is a pernicious, destructive development that must be opposed.

If the National Policy Institute was properly managed, then there would be no room for the looming catastrophe of a Counter-Currents think tank.

Der Movement's ethnic affirmative action program is not a theoretical construct; instead, it is a real world disaster bringing a seemingly endless series of negative consequences.

Please distribute far and wide. That is based on my Amren article from about 20 years ago. Translate into other European languages if you can do so.

More High Truster SJW babble that is poisoning the West. Sorry, Cliff, ascribing success to "luck" and "privilege" fails to account for patterns of accomplishment that track not only with ethny/gender (luck? I think not) but also with innate cognitive and behavioral traits (privilege? I think not?).

Certainly, yes, just as phenotype is genes and environment, success is often a combination of merit and some degree of good fortune. But the presence of the latter (sometimes) does not delegitimize the importance of the former. Put it this way. An intelligent and productive person can sometimes become a great success or not, and some degree of luck can be involved. But all the good luck in the world is not going to make a retarded dullard into a rocket scientist or a quantum physicist.

And to say meritocracy leads to discrimination is just virtue-signaling nonsense. So what? Maybe the inferior should be discriminated against to make more room for the superior. This idiot only counts the costs of meritocracy without looking at the benefits, and does the opposite for the anti-meritocratic view.

I'd prefer discrimination with First World standards than equity living in a Third World mud hut.

Readers of my blog know I reject simplistic "worse is better" narratives and instead promote Suvorov's Law. However, it is complex. Things need to be bad enough to stimulate a strong desire for change, but not so bad as t make people give up in despair. There needs to be enough repression to make people uncomfortable and desperate enough for radical solutions, but not so much repression that they have no room for maneuver. People need to see some victories to maintain morale and to delegitimize the System. This requires prudent leadership with sound judgment - not dogmatic imbeciles with piss-poor judgment. We need flexible strategizers, not rigid idiots.

Note 7,8,12. First, as I've written, there's a non-zero chance that Putin ends up as an exile in China, bending over for Ms. Wei Fuk Yu. Second, the stupidity of Der Right - in this case, right-wing populists - is endless. I've been criticizing Trad Vlad since at least December 2013, but the fearless leaders of Der Right know better, huh? Maybe you need new leaders? Third, the victory of "democracy" and "freedom" is what a Colored like this Jap would enjoy - hate speech laws targeting Whites, no freedom of association, genocidal mass migration, globalist control and and end to populist politics. Thanks, Trad Vlad. The deep chess game continues!

America is Ready for Some Movement Reality

A riposte to a Counter-Currents article.

First, Robert Wallace:

Your pessimism is simply not grounded in reality, my friend. I suggest you listen to my radio interview and refer to the original article and its comment section. No one has come up with a convincing case against Greg and I yet.

Excuse me you mendacious moron, Greg Johnson censors and bans people from his blog and refuses to debate people who could "come up with a convincing case against Greg and I."

It’s real easy to say opponents don’t have a “convincing case” against you when you ignore said opponents, refuse to engage with them and debate them, and censor/ban them from commenting on your website. Under those conditions, you’ll find a lack of effective ripostes, no doubt.

As we can see, character is not a strong point in Der Movement.

To the essay:

American patriots are hungry for white identity politics. It was inevitable. White nations are being wrecked by non-whites acting as tribal blocs. Whites are being attacked as a tribal bloc. Eventually, whites will start fighting back as a tribal bloc.

Sure!  I have been hearing that now for only twenty-five years now.  See this, which is several years out-of-date already.  White folks are waking up!  They need to wake up a bit faster, since they’ve hit the “snooze” button for at least the last quarter century.

Whites have been slow to respond in kind because of traitorous leaders and the silly idea that identity politics is bad, but only for white people. 

Yes, and also because the pro-White “movement” (Der Movement) has been an utter and complete failure, led by affirmative action grifters and populated by a bunch of freaks.

Still, it was only a matter of time before white Americans woke up and started fighting back as whites. Polling data now shows that the awakening is here:[material deleted]

You can read that alleged evidence and the links in the original Counter-Currents article. The details really aren’t all that important, since typical and predictable Der Movement failure will, with clockwork regularity, waste the opportunity, and, once again snatch defeat from the jaws of victory.

The people who are most surprised by this are long-time white advocates, some of whom have been predicting for decades that such an awakening is inevitable. 

Yes, indeed, we’ve been hearing this for decades and it is tiresome.

It is true that white identity was almost nonexistent as recently as the 1990s. 

Were you involved in Der Movement in the 1990s? “Almost nonexistent” is a vast exaggeration. It was less than today - that is true enough. But "almost nonexistent?"

But due to Obama, Trump, Black Lives Matter, the Great Replacement, and open anti-white hatred, whites have caught on to their group interests. 

Really?  Yes, I know opinion polls and other pieces of evidence are moving somewhat in that direction.  But to conclude that “whites have caught on to their group interests” is delusional.  This is the result of people in their little cul-de-sacs, fueling their beliefs, and reading too much into an uptick in White disillusionment, which may or may not be permanent.  If “whites have caught on to their group interests” Trump would have won in 2020 (putting aside accusations of election fraud), and Whites would be more actively resisting the Left.  Further, the “whites have caught on to their group interests” is not evenly distributed among the White population. Such a “catching on” is enriched among less educated, working class, red state Whites, and less extant among educated professionals. I can tell you that the antics of the pro-White “movement” have alienated STEM people. There is a vicious cycle in which the subset of Whites that Der Movement focuses on, and the behavior of Der Movement, alienates other elements of the White population, including elements that will ultimately be required for eventual victory. The more those people are alienated, the more we have pro-White Whites being concentrated on the aforementioned red state elements (think FOX News viewers and Gab users), resulting in more alienation of others, etc. This is not a blueprint for success.

This will only intensify as white Americans continue to be assaulted, and there is no reason to think that our enemies have the foresight and self-control to moderate their attack.

Perhaps. It may be that those “enemies” have at least a vague, even unconscious and incoherent, understanding of Suvorov’s Law – of they pull back and moderate, this would empower the pro-White side and give pro-Whites legitimacy and momentum.

Of course, this awakening is a cause for celebration for white advocates. 

Of course – the typical victory psychosis of Der Right. Prematurely celebrate false, empty victories.

But we can’t rest on our laurels. 

Particularly since you haven’t actually accomplished anything yet.  All of the “good news” - to the extent it is real - has come from sociopolitical trends and events that Der Movement had little to nothing to do with.

Now is the moment to push harder than ever. 

Yes, more Pepe and Kek, more Spencer screaming, more Gaslight Greg fundraising, more $340K “executive compensation” for Mophead, and more multiracial Rosie and the Kids White nationalism.

Although white Americans are hungry for our message, in the upcoming elections, the Republican Party and conservative movement are poised to harvest white discontent–and then channel it into more business as usual: tax cuts for billionaires, giveaways to Our Greatest Ally, Platinum Pandering to non-whites, and color-blind civic nationalism for whites. 

And that’s exactly what will happen. The safety valve will release some White discontent, Bubba Gabster will declare victory, and Der Movement will gibber about “Savitri Devi,” Kali Yuga,” and being “snug in your hobbit hole.”

But responding to anti-white identity politics with Republican pabulum is like taking a knife to a gunfight. 

This Wallace seems like a relative newcomer to Der Movement who breathlessly prattles trite memes like this, commentaries that some of us have been hearing for decades.

It is time to face the truth: these people promote a losing strategy because they want us to lose. Stop listening to them.

Yes, but it is not only Republicans who fit this description. What about the Grand Poobah Quota queens.

What should white advocates do?

Drop Der Movement and join with reasonable activists to build a New Movement.

First, we need to keep promoting our message…

More of the same, more of the same endless failure, freakish behavior, and other nonsense. And of course, send more money to the Quota Queens.

…whites are being attacked as whites, and we need to defend ourselves as whites. 

More of the same old message. Forget about the last quarter century, Der Movement has been saying these things since at least the days of Rockwell.

When the Republicans are swept back into power in November, millions of whites will want to go back to sleep. 

Most likely they will.

We won’t let them.

How?  By repeating the same old tired phrases?  By the same old dogma?

Second, although we have made enormous gains in the battle of ideas…

Evidence?  And don’t cite opinion polls – that has more to do with “Obama, Trump, Black Lives Matter, the Great Replacement, and open anti-white hatred” than any ideas percolating from the utterly failed “movement.”

…we need to convert public opinion into political gains. 

Again, how?  Look at the Trump failure. What is going to be different this time?

Thus the next step is to create a policy institute with two primary goals.

1. More money for Greg?  2. More money for Greg?

First, white identity politics currently exists as a mere “specter,” a bogeyman evoked by the establishment. 

Finally, some truth in this essay.

To turn that specter into a real political force, we need to know how many of us there are, where we are, and how committed we are. 

Yes, and decades of work and millions of dollars of “D’Nations” and you guys still don’t know that and I’m sure you will continue not to know it.

Only then will our votes matter as much as our ideas.

Sure. How do do it?  Talk is cheap.

Second, we need to propose concrete policy solutions to counter the negative effects of globalization and multiculturalism.

Again - and decades of work and millions of dollars of “D’Nations” and here we are in the year 2022 and we are told by this person who has suddenly emerged on the scene that we need “concrete policy solutions.” Gee… wasn’t that what the National Policy Institute was supposed to be about?  Tell me again what credentials and qualifications Dickie Spinster has to be made the leader of that.

I see nothing in this piece that hasn’t been repeated previously and has ended up resulting in nothing.  But, hey, we can be open-minded; if this new institute does some good, great, but I suspect it will be a lot of sound and fury signifying nothing.

Listen to this nonsense.

We need fundraising!  Of course!  Fifty million dollar investment!  Lots of movies for Trevor Lynch! Prospective donors get in touch!  Money, money, money!

Wallace wants to monopolize all support and investment into a SINGLE organization – Counter-Currents’ organization of course. I oppose that completely – Counter-Currents is the enemy of the sort of White nationalism I support; Johnson and Counter-Currents are a pernicious influence, and they must be unalterably opposed, and their agenda of putting all pro-White eggs in their destructive basket must be fought in an unrelenting manner.

The idiots claim that in the 1990s there was no white identity politics or racial friction except in…Louisiana.  Can you believe that utter nonsense?  What about the racial tensions in major cities dating back at least to the 1960s?  Well, since much of that involved White ethnic-Colored friction and since Der Movement considers White ethnics more of a problem than Coloreds, then it makes sense.

Note the “take” on Trump. They say Trump was a fraud who did nothing for Whites, but Wallace points out that Trump, with his rhetoric, helped with metapolitics, essentially balkanization and stimulating White recognition of interests. That is 100% on accord with what I have been saying since 2016, and 100% against Johnson’s idea that Trump is a sincere man of genuine greatness. Wallace says that Trump helped the “movement” – I agree, the idea that the “movement” helped Trump is a delusion.  Der Movement benefited from Trumpism. It was a one-way street.

Gottfried like a father to Wallace – is Wallace someone you can trust?  And both of them stress that they are not critiquing the average Jew in the street (their words) - they are only against "Jewish power" (which comes from where? doesn't the average Jew in the street support that Jewish power?).

This is all actually another black mark in Spencer's ledger - his complete failure with the National Policy Institute (NPI) left the opening for Johnson to move in with his own project.  If NPI was a robust enterprise, it would have filled the "movement" organization niche space and left no room for this aggressive power play by Counter-Currents to monopolize the ideological, political, and activist energies of the "movement."

An institute that promotes destructive ideas and that monopolizes the niche space, inhibiting the emergence of potentially superior competitors is obviously a negative, and worse than not having any institute at all. We have to wait and see what this institute does and if there is anything positive, fine, support it, but if not, if it is negative, then it must be opposed as the perfidious infestation it may very well turn out to be.

Given that this is coming from Counter-Currents, the low point, the pit, of Der Movement, can you trust what they would do?  Consider their constant dishonesty; the following is just one small example of many. More lies from Counter-Currents. No, mendacious Counter-Currents scum (more succinctly: Counter-Currents), in the early days of covid the System was NOT telling us we were all going to die. Instead, all of them, including weasel Fauci, was telling us that covid was no big deal, concern about it was xenophobia and anti-Asian racism (a point the HBD-addicted pro-Asian "movement" would like to forget), and that we should all go to Chinatown and patronize Asian establishments. At that time, it was Trump and the Right ringing the alarm bells, while Trump was denounced as a xenophobic germophobe for stopping travel from China. Then at some point, someone must have planted the idea with Trump that worry about covid would tank the economy and ruin his re-election chances, He started dismissing the importance of covid, at which point the anti-Trump hysterics of the Left changed direction completely and fixated on covid as an INTERNAL threat, targeting coloreds. That's the real time line, and don't rewrite history to match your hobbit hole Luddite conspiritard narratives. The whole covid thing was politicized from day one, but the simplistic narrative that the Left/System was always hysterical about covid is WRONG. Counter-Currents lying scumbags.

As to why Der Movement always has these problems - I have discussed many reasons at my blog, including but not limited to the affirmative action, faulty dogma, grifter and freaks, etc.  But also consider what I term The Bel Riose Syndrome. People in power do not like, indeed, fear, subordinates who are too competent - the see those subordinates as potential rivals and threats; at the very least, when the subordinate is more capable than the leader, it makes the leader look bad by comparison, diminishing that leader's legitimacy. So, the competent and the independent-thinking are eschewed, and mediocre sycophants are the best you get.

Odds and Ends, 11/11/21

In der news.

Happy Veterans Day for everyone except the ethnonationalist filth.

Is the "movement" fundraising in order to support activism, or is the pretense of activism done to create a "brand" to support "movement" fundraising?

Academic rigor is necessary to maintain the standards required for maintaining, and improving, an advanced society.

I note that "movement" heroine Princess Tulsi Coconut is on FOX News a lot these days. Lest we forget: see this. Is Negrophilic FOX News in favor of reparations these days?

Der Right, Der Right, Der Right is always wrong.

Lots of talk of "mama bears" with respect to school boards, CRT, and Youngkin. That's great. But where were all those "mama bears" when their cubs were being attacked in school by rabid chimps?

Newt is correct. "Gain of function" is very simple - when some sort of biological, molecular, and/or biomolecular entity acquires new and/or additional and/or increased activities or capabilities, then that is gain of function.  You can play semantic games and redefine it any way you want, but that doesn't change the facts.  Fauci is a despicable turd who belongs in federal prison.  SuperMax for Fauci.

Asian medical lies. Reagan "healed" his colon cancer by having it surgically removed. He was lucky it hadn't metastasized. The doctors told him, according to the story, that it may have spread. They didn't know. Obviously, it hadn't. If it had, his "alternative treatments" would not have helped him any more than it helped Steve Jobs with his pancreatic cancer.

See this.  Putting aside the issue of the references to Lynn and Pierce, I for the most part agree with Strom's points in that presentation. But here's the rub. If Strom really believes all of that, he would be a relentless enemy of HBD, Amren, etc. If that is indeed his attitude, I have as yet not heard or read it clearly expressed. Ball is in your court, Kevin.

Amongst this leftist crap website, we find:

Do the yellows—[the Chinese]—have the same human value as the whites? [Fr.] Licent and many missionaries say that their present inferiority is due to their long history of Paganism. I’m afraid that this is only a ‘declaration of pastors.’ Instead, the cause seems to be the natural racial foundation…

HBDers weep.

Adolf Spencer.  After Greg Johnson explains his own rapid rise in Der Movement he can get back to the question of Spencer’s qualifications for being made head of NPI.  I can understand being angry, but that Spencer recording was a bit over-the-top.  The funny thing is, the High Trusters (i.e., Johnson) call me “insane” and they (fetishists in general) talk about “gesticulating swarthoids,” but perhaps they need to look a bit closer to home.

See this.  That's a blow to the Arctic Alliance narrative as well as the "Asians are better at everything" narrative. There's a lack of comity between Whites and Asians, which should be obvious to anyone who doesn't have Ms. Wei Fuk Yu as their proctologist.

Overweight Turko-Albanian "Ostrogoth":

Maybe I had to lasso Greg Johnson over to Dlive, but he appears to have developed both a knack for and an enjoyment of the livestream format. Why shouldn’t he? The philosopher’s natural place is in the salon, or in the agora. Ideas are meant to be tested.

Yeah...how about "testing" the ideas by debating opponents, instead of calling them "insane."

Counter-Currents has to be the most dishonest site on the Internet.

An Interesting Tidbit

Move on, move on, there's nothing to see here.  In all cases, emphasis added.

More Humphrey.  Putting aside Humphrey's particular emphasis there, what do we see? The racial situation for America was grim when that was written and far grimmer today. Why then do the Quota Queens tell us we will win and decry "blackpilling" when non-Nordicists come to the same conclusion as Humphrey? Why do Johnson and McCulloch (a Humphrey protegee) (indirectly) go back and forth as to whether the victory will take 50 years (Johnson's take) or whether that's too long to wait; e.g., McCulloch in TOO:

...it is certainly anticlimactic in the temporal sense, with a gradual process that might take fifty years, a couple of generations, or until well after those opposed to it are dead. Unfortunately, most of those who are in favor of the ethnostate, who presumably worked and fought against seemingly impossible odds to win it—and want to enjoy their victory by living in it—will also be dead. Fifty years is the life expectancy of a 29-year-old man. 

McCulloch is essentially saying he's pissed that he won't be around to see the vaunted White ethnostate. After all, what's most important is not eventually securing the existence of Europeans on the North American continent, but selfishly wanting to "enjoy their victory."

Getting back to my main point - how come realism about our plight is OK when Humphrey does it and Amren regurgitates it, but is "blackpilled" negativism when others express the same opinions?

Let's move on from that bit of "movement" hypocrisy and delve into the realm of "movement" affirmative action. In that same TOO piece, McCulloch writes:

I first met Greg Johnson in 2001 as part of a group of fifteen conference attendees having a late dinner at the Grove Park Inn in Asheville, NC. Dr. Johnson was among those seated at my end of the table. To drop two familiar names, Sam Francis and Jared Taylor were among those seated at the other end.

The Good Old (Nord) Boys Club in action. Note that Taylor (HBD "race realist") and Francis ("paleoconservative") were in a private dinner meeting with radical Nordicist McCulloch. Note also how quickly Johnson rose to be included with such "august personages" - not long after he entered the "movement." But there's no affirmative action, no siree. To understand how early 2001 was in Johnson's journey through Der Movement, see this:

While living in Atlanta, Georgia (in late 1999 or early 2000), Johnson met Joshua Buckley, a former skinhead and the editor of Tyr, a radical Traditionalist journal. In September 2000, Johnson attended a lecture given by British Holocaust denier David Irving. In late 2000, he started to think about founding his own white nationalist journal, but abandoned the idea after the creation of The Occidental Quarterly in 2001.The following year, he joined the faculty of the Pacific School of Religion as a Visiting Assistant Professor of Philosophy and Swedenborgian Studies. In 2007, Johnson became the editor of The Occidental Quarterly, establishing its online version in collaboration with Michael J. Polignano.

So, in 2001, Johnson was in between abandoning the idea of "founding his own white nationalist journal" and joining "the faculty of the Pacific School of Religion as a Visiting Assistant Professor of Philosophy and Swedenborgian Studies."  But he was at a dinner meeting with Taylor, Francis, and McCulloch (all of this assumes McCulloch's recollection is accurate; insofar as I know, neither Taylor nor Johnson has denied the accuracy of this).

Also:

From his introduction I got the impression that Dr. Johnson was an academic doing research on our movement...

That sounds strangely familiar to how Hermansson wormed his way in, including the dinner thing:

In Britain, Mr. Hermansson attended a private dinner of extremists where Greg Johnson, a reclusive leading American far-right figure who is editor in chief of Counter-Currents Publishing...

And, of course, "movement" affirmative action helped there as well:

His Swedish background also helped. Among the groups he frequented were many neo-Nazis who like fascists in the 1930s and 40s, lionise Swedes as an original "unspoilt" version of the Aryan race.

"They believed that people from Scandinavia are more racially pure," he says. "And of course, that was a myth back then, and it's a myth now… but people said to me in very clear words, 'Oh, you are the master race."

Hey, there's no affirmative action, no siree!

By the way, I was "banned" at Counter-Currents after pointing out, in a comment, the fact that "movement" Nordicism facilitated the Hermansson humiliation.  That comment, as you can see, accurately reflected reality, but was enough to get me "banned." Back to McCulloch:

...accompanied by two grad students and a London journalist who was writing a book on political fringe groups. 

I thought we were were not supposed to be "in bed with the press." I don't know the ethnic background of those "two grad students" but we can presume that the "London journalist" was of British stock (if I am wrong, then those involved can correct that error). The journalist was allowed to be there I suppose because the Quota Queens - despite protestations to the contrary - like to use the press to boost their "leadership" credentials to the rank-and-file. It is unclear from McCulloch's writing (and why divulge all of this private information - does this "name dropping" make McCulloch feel ever-so-important?) whether the "two grad students" were associated with Johnson or with the "London journalist" or were there on their own as independent entities (if so, why?). These details aside, the point remains of Johnson's remarkably rapid inclusion amongst the Grand Poobahs, independent of the "writing a book" bait of the "London journalist" (and the uncertain status of the "two grad students").

As I recall, he asked a lot of questions and did a lot of listening.

Yes, after all, anyone just starting out in the "movement" would be there to ask questions of Taylor, Francis, and McCulloch, right?

Since that introduction he has risen to a position of  prominence...

On his livestream with Dickson, Johnson denied he was the beneficiary of any affirmative action, scoffed at it, and labeled me a "paranoid piece of crap" for suggesting it. Johnson averred that he has a PhD and so his inclusion in private dinners and his rapid rise "to a position of prominence" was merely due to his own intellectual brilliance and academic pedigree.  After all, no one else in the "movement" ever had a PhD before him, amirite?

No affirmative action of course, no siree.  

A Gab correspondent who is a friend of this blog has provided more information. See this. That’s the rationale for sticking him right into the middle of Der Movement and its “leaders?”

More on Johnson’s “movement” history:

I think it was Labor Day of 2000 when I took the next step. I went out to a diner in Buckhead where David Irving was going to talk. There were people there, and some of them seemed a little like seedy haters from Hollywood central casting. But you know, I’m one of these essentially liberal-minded White people. I’m open to “the other.” 

Johnson went from that to dinner with Taylor, Francis, and McCulloch in one year. Astonishing.

Also:

This turned out to be Joshua Buckley who is the editor of the journal TYR now. He was an ex-skinhead and really, really intelligent. Pretty much self-educated. High school drop-out, highly intelligent, self-educated guy, ex-skinhead. And he was the first actual concrete person that I met who was on the Right, aside from myself and this friend of mine. I found it really eye-opening. Not just eye-opening, world-opening. This whole world opened up around me…Yeah. He introduced me to the neofolk music scene and a lot of other stuff that I thought was really fascinating. At that point, I kind of made the plunge into not just privately thinking these ideas but not doing anything more . . . Because, essentially, deep down inside I just felt it was all hopeless anyway, right? It’s like the world’s going to hell, and there’s nothing anybody can do. I actually started thinking, “Well, maybe something can be done.” So, I started educating myself and getting more into this.

From that to hobnobbing to top "movement" "leaders" in a flash. 

Re: that last paragraph from Counter-Currents, my Gab correspondent provides the following, which may in part be speculation but likely and reasonable:

Timeline:

Joshua Buckley, was the main business partner of Sam Dickson (who lives in Atlanta Georgia).

Greg meets Joshua Buckley due to shared interest in The Men Who Can't Tell Time -> Greg meets Sam Dickson -> Dickson probably introduces him to William Regenery Jared Taylor Sam Francis etc. All while Greg still posed as Randian Objectivist in public and contributed nothing to WN yet.

Even Spencer was more meritocratic as he had been the editor and writer of Takimag and The American Conservative, which he got due to his years of Conservative activism and the Duke Conservative Union. And had already had a WN website before he got Regenery money to make NPI (which made it bigger).

So, as bad and relatively meritless as Spencer’s elevation was, Johnson’s was far worse.

Johnson's rapid rise in, and maintained status in, Der Movement was for some reason not mimicked by his ex-collaborator, the wop-mick hybrid Polignano, who started in Der Movement around the same time as did Johnson.

Fancy that.

What happened to Patler? Driven to murder (or framed). Tommasi was murdered. Polignano was discussed by Forney and Friberg, re: what happened to him with Johnson. Calabro was attacked behind his back as "racially mixed" and "stealing Northern European women" (I believe his wife was Irish). Conte's throwing other wops under the bus (contrasting the "purity" of his own Calabrian mountain heritage with "mongrel" coastal Sicilians) didn't help him in the end, did it? Sallis is, of course, a "paranoid piece of crap" suffering from "insanity."

If you see any pattern there, then YOU are an "insane paranoid piece of crap."

The relevance of all of this is based on the following:

1. Racial activism for Whites, and hence White well-being, is currently predominantly associated with Der Movement, which has gone from failure to failure.

2. A significant portion of the problem with Der Movement is a failure of leadership.

3. The failure of leadership is in part due to Der Movement’s ethnic affirmative action policy.

4. Therefore, discussion of that policy is important for the future of racial activism and, hence, well-being of our people.

Questions for Greggy

No answers are expected to be delivered.

See this.

Let’s start with the whole “keeping Richard Spencer’s coke dealer away from an Amren conference” thing.

First, Johnson deftly ignores the point about the homosexual cabal within Der Movement and instead concentrates on his alleged role vetting for Amren, and on Pilleater’s accusations of cocaine use at Amren conferences by the Spencer faction.

By the way, Pilleater’s accusations are either true or false. For the sake of argument, in this post I will assume that they are true (I do not know if this is really the case), but if they are false, then that was slander on the part of Pilleater, a defamation repeated in writing by Johnson.

Is Johnson really vetting people for Amren meetings? Some people claimed in livestreams/podcasts that Amren staff denied that and that Johnson has to apologize to Taylor for stating that, but I do not know if that is true.

What makes Johnson, a victim of the Hermansson and Lewis infiltrations, in any way qualified to vet for anyone about anything?

If Pilleater’s accusations were true, what does that say about Amren conferences and their vetting and about a “movement” that elevated Spencer to positions of leadership, including that of The National Policy Institute (NPI)?

If the cocaine thing is true, given that the System allegedly is hostile to Spencer, Amren, Der Movement, etc., was the whole “illegal drug use at Amren conferences” accusation ever investigated?  If yes, why no charges?  If not, why not? The whole thing seems rather strange. It reminds me of an incident I am aware of (the details of which I will not disclose) in which a past inept Grand Poobah did something wrong that was adjudicated through the legal system in some manner, but was not known to the rank-and-file at large (being a more local incident), and there can be no doubt that the watchdog groups had to know about it, and yet the watchdogs never reported it, and thus protected that “leader” from having his status diminished. It’s almost as if the System doesn’t want to eliminate incompetent Quota Queens filling the leadership niche space of pro-White activism.

Now, let’s turn to Johnson’s characterization of Pilleater’s sexual harassment complaints as “Gay guy meets other gay and flirtation occurs.”  Putting aside the question as to why flirtation of any kind, much less homosexual flirtation, is appropriate for a pro-White meeting, we can ask the following. Doesn’t Pilleater identify as bisexual rather than gay (after all, Johnson thinks it funny that Pilleater brought an Asiatrix girlfriend to a pro-White meeting)?  Didn’t Pilleater complain about actual harassment, rather than just “flirtation?” And what’s Johnson’s comment about “BelieveAllWomen” about? Is he equating bisexual man Pilleater with a woman?  And if Johnson mocks “BelieveAllWomen” why does he believe Spencer’s ex-wife (see below)?

The “LOL. Your absence will not be noted for missed” is juvenile.  Moving on:

Johnson then says “I am sure you witnessed several lifetimes worth of degeneracy at the loft in Alexandria.”

I wonder what Polignano witnessed in a San Francisco apartment, but that’s another story. If Spencer is all that Johnson believes he is then what does it say about Der Movement, Regnery, CMS, and NPI for elevating Spencer to positions of authority?  Affirmative action, anyone?

Johnson nitpicks that he “never used the phrase ‘handsome, blossoming guy.”  OK, but does he deny using the word “blossoming” to describe Pilleater’s brother?  Does he understand why some people would think it strange that a middle-aged man would describe a younger man as “blossoming?”

Johnson then talks about a “psychopath who beat his wife during both of her pregnancies,” which, given the context of the comment, is certainly about Spencer. Johnson then says he believes Nina – BelieveAllWomen?

If Johnson believes this, then please tell us - what qualifications Spencer had to be made the head of NPI?

Johnson then mocks people concerned about “poor Pilleater” (what about “poor Nina?”), who are, he avers, actually interested in smearing poor Greg. But if there is nothing wrong in the Pilleater recording, re: Johnson, then how could he be smeared by it?  What is false about the recording? Johnson then asks if a “Forney livestream” is “the appropriate forum” for people to deal with Pilleater’s complaints. Very well.  What should they do instead?  Perhaps support Pilleater filing a legal complaint about being sexually harassed?  Would that be an appropriate forum?

Some may respond to this by asserting that this focus on people (and events) rather than ideas is indicative of “low thinking.” But, alas, in the end, this is about ideas: That Der Movement is a disaster because of failed leadership (and their poor judgment) and because of the low quality of its personnel, and this is tied to Der Movement’s ethnic affirmative action policy. As Nietzsche said, people can be used as lenses through which ideas can be focused upon.

Think Tanks

Necessary.

We need Far Right, White nationalist think tanks.  And, no, not comedies like The National Policy Institute, with affirmative action "leadership." I'm talking about serious entities, with "big boy" merit-based leadership, producing high quality analysis on a regular basis. Such entities could also generate data, such as by opinion polling, and actually have such data for empirical analysis, instead of just blowing hot air via purely subjective opinion pieces. There are many important things that could be done, and that should be done.

Note I use the "plural" - think tanks. Given the conflicting ideologies and endless feuding in the "movement" it is unlikely that any single such entity could come together, much less last.  Given the affirmative action program, and "movement" freakishness and irrationality, some of these projects will of course end up being ludicrous (image Nordicist, Traditionalist, or HBD "think tanks").  You could hope these would fail, but given the "movement," they probably would garner more support than other, more serious, entries into the field. No doubt there will be much disaster here, as is typical with the "movement."

Nevertheless, if even just one "movement" think tank proves rational and effective, this would be a welcome addition to the activist toolkit.  We need serious analysis; we can get only so far with people screaming "Kek!," chugging gallons of milk, or gibbering about "Kali Yuga."

Money?  How to fund this?  Hey, maybe if folks were not getting $340K+ in a year for "executive compensation" for running an "online publication," and other similar wastes of funding, there would be money for serious projects.

The Axis of Queervil

Concerns

Is this true?

topimpanation

Looks like William Regnery II didn't have any kids. Hmmm...

Radical Runner topimpanation

He was gay.

topimpanation Radical Runner

I figured.

I do not know if that accusation is true, or merely another example of misguided, wrong, “movement” gossip, this time from Amren commenters (although the picture here makes one wonder).  But the status of Regnery’s private preferences is not the real issue here. The issue is not with one person, but has to be looked at from a broader perspective. Considering the Beltway/Virginia-Georgia-Florida “movement” axis, the Florida and Georgia components have been enriched (past and present) with individuals either rumored to be gay, or definitively known to be gay.  

I have previous discussed how I was warned in the early 2000s (by an individual who shall go nameless here, but who was positioned to know) about a gay cabal in the “movement,” and that was directed toward the aforementioned “movement” axis. Various incidents and revelations and speculations since then have conformed the validity of that warning.

One can wonder further. Was the rapid rise of Richard Spencer in the “movement” influenced by the private preferences of leading “movement” figures?  I need to be very clear here, to prevent misinterpretation and misquoting of what I am saying here by the Nutzi peanut gallery. I am not – repeat NOT – saying that Spencer himself (a man with a history of heterosexual relationships, including marriage and children) is homosexual (or bisexual).  Repeat – I am not saying that.  But it is certainly plausible that “movement” gays – including prominent “closeted” aging homosexuals – gave a boost to Spencer because they liked the “cut of his jib,” so to speak. That would be in addition to Spencer’s inherent advantages due to Der Movement’s ethnic affirmative action program. Liddell’s jibe that a certain Alt Righter hates Spencer because of a “bitter gay crush” takes on new meaning here as well.

That’s all mere speculation. It may have no basis in fact (although Spencer’s elevation, particularly at NPI, without any real credentials, is a matter of record, regardless of the reasons).  However, “where’s there’s smoke, there’s fire.” There have been so many repeated comments, speculations, warnings, revelations, etc. about the cabal within the axis – an Axis of Queervil – that it is highly unlikely that such does not exist. After all, the Pilleater Chronicles tape mentioned a Facebook group, suggesting that at least some fire does accompany the smoke.

If this cabal exists and is influencing the direction of pro-White activism, at least in America, then this is an issue that needs to be considered and addressed.

Odds and Ends, 7/21/21

In der news.

Of interest.

Further, the high morale and solidarity that citizens exhibit during a disaster dissolve the individualist outlook that elites have long learned to control and maintain. The seemingly positive and prosocial solidarity response of the population is itself a threat to the mechanisms of elite power in our society. Just as disasters empower normal citizens on the ground, who have no choice but to take fate into their own hands, they leave elites feeling distant and helpless. Chess and Clarke call this state of affairs “elite panic:” a fearful distrust of the populace that prompts leaders to restrict information, over-concentrate resources, and use coercive methods to reassert authority in the face of temporary breakdowns in public order. This style of response poses an active danger to disaster survivors and, ironically, creates the very resistance to authority that leaders fear most. Nowhere is this clearer than in the history of epidemic response.

The people must be trusted with fear, and the governing class must be comfortable with leadership during times of crisis. Fear is an unpleasant emotion— but at times, a useful one. Fear lends urgency to action. Fear forces the afraid to focus on that which matters. This is the great lesson of the 2020 coronavirus: We should have been allowed to fear. Alas, our leaders feared our fear more than they feared our deaths. The world bears the consequences of this stark faith in the myth of panic.

One wonders if “elite panic” describes the reaction of “movement” leadership to activists realizing that Der Movement is a pathetic failure and feeling fear at the imminent collapse of any credible White racialist resistance?

According to the MacDonaldite hypothesis, Northwest Europeans are particularly susceptible to Jewish/Globalist manipulation because the Inner Hajnal Nords are highly individualistic, altruistic, egalitarian, etc.

But wouldn't that also make them very susceptible to manipulation by HBDers? Wouldn't that make them more gullible to various HBD-style memes (ironically enough, including the MacDonaldite hypothesis itself)?

Finally, and as stated before here, why should such easily manipulated and gullible types be allowed to monopolize leadership positions in the pro-White dissident movement?

Wouldn't you want more ethnocentric and less easily manipulated people in such positions - that is, if you REALLY believed in the reality of such stark intra-European differences in behavior?

Regnery has died. Regnery represents the tragedy of lost opportunities. A person with his money, willing to donate to the Far Right, could have been a game-changer, instead of flushing the money down the Der Movement toilet.

Not surprising he was in Florida. Anyone who has followed Der Movement with any interest has noticed the Beltway/Virginia-Georgia-Florida axis, what the Majority Rights crowd perceptively termed "The Regnery Circus" - a gaggle of fetishists, Anglocentrics, Nordicists, ethnonationalists, HBDers, grifters, traditionalists, and/or homosexuals.

Imagine if that money had gone into building a real legal defense (and offense) infrastructure, lobbying, meeting places, funding people like Salter, etc.

Der Movement has objected to the movie Caddyshack because they claim it is anti-WASP (it is) and reflects Jewish anxieties and anger over being excluded from "WASP country clubs" (it does). What Der Movement fails to mention (of course) is that the movie is also anti-Italian, perhaps because Der Movement shares the Jewish Hollywood perception of "the wops" as greasy, stupid, violent, hyper-sexed, thuggish punks.

The "good guys" of the film (apart from "spaced out" deracialized WASP "Ty" - a model for the type of Old Stock degeneracy that Jews have always promoted) are crypto-Jewish "Eastern Europeans" as well as Irish Catholics. Both Jews and the Irish gave us the 1965 Immigration Act ("good guys"), while Italian-Americans have moved to the right politically ("bad guys").

Amusingly, Humphrey Ireland was distraught about right-wing wops (the dreaded John Marchi!) - how dare "they" invade "our" conservatism!

See this.

To give his views a more public face, in 2005 he spent $380,000 to create the National Policy Institute, a think tank designed to inject white-supremacist ideas into mainstream political conversations.

But the institute languished for its first decade, even after Mr. Regnery hired the alt-right figure Richard Spencer, a charismatic former Ph.D. student, in 2011.

Rewritten for more accuracy:

But the institute languished for its first decade, especially after Mr. Regnery hired the failed alt-right figure Richard Spencer, a charismatic former Ph.D. student, in 2011.

Imagine if that $380,000 had been used to create a legal defense infrastructure.  

Once again I ask Johnson – what were Spencer’s qualifications being made the head of NPI?

Spencerian Apostasy?

In der news.

Once again, Greg: What qualifications did Richard Spencer have for being made President of the NPI? Apparently, all of Scott Greer’s “qualifications,” sans the “187 IQ.” And, many of your "qualifications" for being made TOQ editor, sans the PhD.

We are getting closer and closer to my prediction of Spencer dropping out of/repudiating Far Right activism.  It is possible that it won’t be a “clean break” but simply a gradual shift, and at some point we can say the line has been crossed and then that will be that. Keep in mind, once again, that this is the person who was made President of NPI.

If anyone is ultimately responsible for terminal White decline it is The Retard Right and its affirmative action “leadership.” Johnson will, of course, continue to deny that the affirmative action policy exists.

Thus, let us rewrite this:

Every time you think a man has fallen as far as he possibly go, you quickly realize how wrong you were.

To this:

Every time you think Der Movement has fallen as far as it could possibly go, you quickly realize how wrong you were.

When you read this, remember that Der Retards say that covid-19 is only a “cold” or a “flu” or a “hoax.”

(((fellow White people))) They’re HuWhite!

Cervantes:

…you are a female, and consequently inconstant!

…a female, as you observe, will follow here natural disposition, in spite of all you can do to oppose it.

…the natural disposition of women, which is always injudicious and imperfect.

…inveigh against the levity of the female sex: their fickleness, their double dealing, their rotten promises, their broken faith; and finally, their want of judgment in bestowing their affections.

His Fraudulency

Dementia Joe’s new title.

See this.

We must make this clear: The legitimate President of the United States, 2021-2025, is Donald J. Trump.  Joe Biden’s “victory” is completely illegitimate, it must never be accepted or legitimized by right-thinking people, and anyone and everyone enabling this fraud must be remembered and held accountable.

Joe Biden must be referred to, from now on, as His Fraudulency.

The reality of Trump.

See this.

The situation is a perfect setup, in other words, for a talented politician to run on Trumpism in 2024. A person without the eager Twitter fingers and greedy hotel chains, someone with a penchant for governing rather than golf. An individual who does not irritate everyone who doesn’t already like him, and someone whose wife looks at him adoringly instead of slapping his hand away too many times in public. Someone who isn’t on tape boasting about assaulting women, and who says the right things about military veterans. Someone who can send appropriate condolences about senators who die, instead of angering their state’s voters, as Trump did, perhaps to his detriment, in Arizona. A norm-subverting strongman who can create a durable majority and keep his coalition together to win more elections.  

Well, well, five years too late…

Look, I endorsed Trump and voted for him, but the man is and always was a despicable turd. I identified Trump as a fraud and a vulgar ignorant buffoon even before the 2016 election and he proved me right by betraying his base for the past four years. He acts surprised about what is going on – but who was it who refused to “drain the swamp?” Who was it who actually enabled the swamp and refilled it with more fetid water?  That’s you Donnie. Now that swamp is swallowing you and you are baffled.  Surprise!

Trump and his supporters are upset about the GOP not rallying to his defense. Hey, Donnie – the GOP is “monitoring the situation.” Sound familiar?  What goes around comes around.

An explanation as to why Johnson keeps on promoting the lie that Trump could have won in 2016 with a Jeb Bush platform is something I read on Occidental Dissent – that Richard Spencer has been asserting the truth that Trump stumbled into the immigration issue and cynically used it for electoral success without really believing in it – essentially my view. Johnson’s reflexive and bizarre obsession about Spencer likely informs his gaslighting about Trump’s alleged “sincerity.”

See this.

We at the National Alliance are so focused on building racial consciousness among the best of our people, and on building the Alliance itself, that we would have little to no time for electoral politics…

Strom may not be interested in electoral politics but electoral politics is interested in him. His work depends on certain realities, including the continuation of an open society. The Senate situation is, unfortunately due to GA voter fraud, still open and fluid.  If the Jan. 5 runoffs go the wrong way, that ultimately is going to affect the ability of Strom to utilize the First Amendment to spread his message.  Strom may claim he doesn’t care, but then I’d like to read and hear what Strom has to say about what he is going to do if he’s censored off the Internet and his racial views are considered forbidden “hate speech.”

Romanian women making themselves useful.  Any comments from Munro?

How’s that Arctic Alliance coming along, Johnny?

So, let us all forget the past five days of Johnson screaming about the stolen election, the dire consequences of a Trump loss, and the absolute need for Trump to keep on fighting and never concede.

If you remember Johnson writing or saying that, you are obviously “insane.”  Just as you are "insane" for remembering this.

Remember – there is no way out but through Johnson.

American White racial activism can be saved only through dismantling Der Movement and its affirmative action policy and by deposing the Quota Queens.

Speaking of which, some questions for Johnson. He angrily rejects my assertion that he himself is a product of affirmative action. But what about his arch enemy Spencer then?  Will Johnson please tell us all what were Spencer’s qualifications for being made President of the NPI?  What?  His sterling work at TAC and Taki’s Mag (I’ll pass over the question as to how he was qualified even for that)? What? You, Johnson, justify your sudden elevation to TOQ editor because you have “a PhD” – does Spencer have “a PhD?”  Did he write any books or write any peer-reviewed papers of importance? Did he have many years of activist experience? What was it? Or was it merely that as a young and well-connected preppy WASP he appealed to his older co-ethnics at CMS who saw in him a younger version of themselves (in more ways than one, eh, given his record of non-stop, constant failure?) and recognized him as “one of the boys?”  

What is more important to Johnson I wonder?  His hatred of Spencer or his self-serving need to defend the affirmative action policy? Will Johnson stomach his hatred of Spencer and regale us with Spencer's lost history of accomplishments that justified the NPI appointment? Or will Johnson, as usual, ignore these questions?