Suck It Up

A brief riposte to Colored arrogance.

See this.

Putting aside the typical stupidity of equating (thanks a lot Nordicists and nativist Anglomaniacs for making the comparison possible) past European immigrants to the more recent alien Colored influx, let us focus on the following example of arrogant and entitled Colored Privilege:

Allentown resident Emely Minaya, who came from the Dominican Republic as a child, says she thinks Allentown is an example of the future of America when it comes to diversifying communities. 

"Even those states where there's probably no Hispanics at all, no Black people, they will be seeing a lot of that in next few years," she said. 

Asked what she would say to those who may be troubled by that potential demographic shift, she says to "suck it up." "It's going to happen," she said. "That's it."

Well, in response, when Coloreds, Jews, White leftists, System apparatchiks, etc. complain about:

• Whites being racist, anti-Semitic, bigoted, privileged, intolerant, etc.
• Whites rejecting demographic change and complaining about it.
• Whites supporting Trump and other right-wing populists.
• Whites increasingly becoming more attracted to the Far Right (even if the current stupidities of the Far Right alienate Whites and thus heretofore take advantage of this trend.
• Whites looking askance at alien mongrels like “Emely Minaya” or Whites doing anything the System/Left/ Colored do not like.

Then the answer should be:

Suck it up!  It’s going to happen!  That’s it!

Whites should stop being so damn polite and so solicitous of the feelings of others. If the HBD Nordicists really believe their dogma, maybe they should promote the idea that Whites should reject the Universalist Eloi attitudes of the HBD Nordicists’ beloved High Trusters and instead adopt the (allegedly) more xenophobic attitudes of those runty chicken Morlock mouth breathing dagos and other such ethnocentric Whites. I seem to recall that the Eloi were a race of passive weaklings. Is that the ideal HBD Nordicist role model?  It does seem that way.

Another way of answering the “suck it up” comment is for Whites to absolutely refuse to “suck it up” and to refuse to accept the changes being forced upon them. There are many ways of doing this, legally, through the broad application of politics, metapolitics, and social engineering.

Thus – vote for right-wing populist, or better yet, if available, Far Right, candidates; get actively involved in the Far Right, correct its errors, and make it a vehicle for the effective pursuit of White interests; protest; speak out; manifest passive aggressive disengagement from the System that depends on Whites for its effective maintenance; do Salter’s democratic multiculturalism; behave in such a manner to make the newcomers feel unwelcome (legally, of course) and also shun Whites who support White genocide (social pricing against them); do White community building; etc.

With respect to accepting your displacement: Just refuse. Just say no. Then say yes to pro-White activism.  And, finally, tell the scum Minaya to go fuck herself.

White Resistance is going to happen.  That's it.

Suck it up.

Odds and Ends, 5/21/22

In der news.

This is a defining moment for the broader Right, extending even people like Tucker Carlson. The Right cannot allow itself to be silenced about the TRUTH about The Great Replacement. Race and demographics are THE MOST IMPORTANT issues of our time. Indeed, the Right needs to "double down" on the facts about (intentional) demographic change. To achieve this, we need spokesmen who are sane, articulate, and intelligent - who make a good impression and are persuasive. There is no one in Der Movement or the Alt Rite who fit the bill.

See this. The Left is claiming that their Disinformation Board was targeted by disinformation from Republicans and the Right in general, who spread the "disinformation" that the board would itself target American political speech, instead of focusing on "foreign actors." But wait - if the Left claims that American political opposition to the Board is "disinformation" then doesn't that prove the point of that opposition that the Board would indeed label American right-wing opinion as "disinformation?" Are they so contemptuous of us that they thought we wouldn't notice that blatant mendacity and hypocrisy?

And the winner of the Counter-Currents Great Replacement essay contest is this that features:

The Rise and Fall of WASP Preservationism

The nineteenth-century wilderness preservation movement was, from its inception, a WASPish and elite affair....Almost all were critics of the vulgarity and filth of city living as well as the arrival of the world’s “wretched refuse,” who had no appreciation for the sturdy pioneer virtues of America’s founders nor for its wilderness. Many were supporters of eugenics and immigration restriction, and indeed saw these issues and wilderness preservation as two sides of the same coin. As Madison Grant explained to his friend Henry Fairfield Osborn, both were “attempts to save as much as possible of the old America.”... environmental organizations attracted many ethnic minorities (who did not share the hated WASP’s preoccupations with solitude and sublimity) to their cause...

All you "wretched refuse," all you Southern and Eastern Europeans, have no conception of "solitude and sublimity" - you penned up runty chicken Morlocks you!

Laugh at this.

Jim GoadMay 19, 2022 at 1:03 pm

According to the actual definition of “species”—a group of organisms capable of producing offspring together...

Ignorant and misleading. Different species can produce offspring in some cases. While members of the same species always have to be able to (potentially) produce offspring, it is not true that members of different species are always excluded from producing offspring.

It gets funnier: 

If they were simply all Canis but not familiaris, they wouldn’t be able to interbreed.

Shhh...the reality that dogs can interbreed with wolves, coyotes, and jackals is not recognized by the hobbit hole crew. I thought it was common knowledge that most canids (excepting, e.g., foxes) can interbreed. I should have known better.

I remember a time not too long ago when denying simple biological facts was the exclusive domain of leftists.

And the domain of ignorant retards like Jim Goad. Hey, Jimmy, members of different canid species CAN interbreed.  Lions and tigers CAN interbreed.  YOU are the one “denying simple biological facts,” you moronic self-righteous asshole.

Reproductive isolation cannot be used as a criterion for defining species based on how species are currently classified. Now, true enough, species classification - based on, say, morphological, behavioral, and/or genetic differences - is somewhat arbitrary. While differences between organism types are real, where we draw the line is in large part a human invention.

Thus, in theory, you could, if you desired, define species by reproductive isolation. If you do so, then dogs, wolves, coyotes are all the same species, and lions and tigers are the same species.  Indeed, all "different species" capable of producing "hybrid offspring" - or at least fertile offspring - would be the "same species."

The problem with that definition is that it lumps together animals that are truly distinct. No one would ever mistake a lion for a tiger, or vice versa. If defining species based on reproductive compatibility produces classifications that ignore fundamental and important morphological, behavioral, and/or genetic differences, then that is a lousy definition (regardless of how popular it may be among laymen).

Zero Immigration Solution

Accept the demographic consequences.

We all know that the System’s demographic-economic justification for genocidal mass immigration to Western (majority White) nations is the idea is that Western nations have below-replacement birthrates, with declining, aging populations, and so these nations need immigrants from other nations – predominantly Third World/Global South peoples with higher birthrates – to make up the demographic shortfall (the case of the USA will be discussed near the end of this essay, below). Nationalists from Western nations object to this, and rightly so, since that process will inexorably result in the biological and cultural replacement of the native population by aliens, which is, essentially, a form of slow-motion genocide.

My solution to the demographic problem is the exact opposite of what the System is proposing and doing. My solution is to stop enabling nations and populations engaging in reckless demographic behavior, said enabling manifested by allowing Western nations to avoid the consequences of their selfish hedonism and allowing the Colored nations to avoid the consequences of endless population growth and poor management of their own nations, via the safety valve of transferring their excess population to the West.

Thus, I advocate zero immigration – absolute zero. Force the Western nations to face the consequences of their demographic choices – the shrinking and aging population, worker shortages, shrinking economies, problems in funding social welfare including caring for the aged, etc. Force the Colored nations to face the consequences of overpopulation, youth unemployment, restless young men, mismanaged governments and economies. Using the Colored excess to fill in the demographic gaps in the West, and so create a safety valve for Colored overpopulation and unemployment, is a short-term solution, one that enables bad behavior on both sides, makes both sides addicted to ad hoc immigration faux-solutions, and does not solve the inherent fundamental problems in both societies. And, as stated, for the West and Western populations, the problem is existential, for, if the process continues, it ultimately means the end of the West. It will result in the replacement of the West with new Colored nations, which will, in the end, exhibit the same problems as their original homelands. Thus, the West dies and the Third World remains as dysfunctional as ever, albeit with new territories for the ever-expanding Colored populations.

Instead, the West needs to find endogenous, internal solutions to its demographic crisis. Years, likely decades, of pain will ensue, with the consequences of the shrinking and aging population and all that means. Too bad. That pain will force radical solutions so as to adapt to the new reality, possibly including accepting negative economic “growth,” downscaled expectations, less social welfare, people working long and harder, extensive use of automation, and, yes, INCREASED NATIVE BIRTHRATES. Yes, the latter will take decades to “kick in,” so the period of adjustment will last a long time. But this, however painful, will be a long-term and sustainable solution, one that allows for the survival of the West and of Western peoples (particularly if combined with repatriation of aliens already present in Western nations, which does need to occur as well).  On the other side of the equation, if the Global South no longer has the safety valve of shipping their excess population to the West, they will need to take radical measures for population control and endogenous, native solutions to their political, social, and economic problems. That will entail pain as well.  But it is a long-term and sustainable solution.

Unfortunately, I do not see the political will on either side of the divide for this, unless and until it is forced upon them (and the only way I see this happening is either a Far Right political renaissance throughout the West and/or some sort of global economic collapse or other crisis). As both sides are addicted to the short-term “solution” of Third World to West population transfer, neither side, as currently constituted, will voluntarily stop the process.

But my solution is the only real solution.  Humanity needs to go “cold turkey” with respect to mass immigration.

Now, America (and some other nations) is a somewhat different case, as the overall birthrates are still higher than in Europe, although racial differences within America means that low birthrate Whites are in numerical decline. And there is evidence that overall birthrates are declining.  So, regardless of differences with Europe, there is still the Ponzi scheme notion that immigration (and its cheap labor) are necessary for economic growth and to sustain a population that is getting older.  But the same basic principle applies. America is addicted to mass immigration the same as is (Western) Europe and for many of the same reasons, even if some details differ. The majority White population is being race replaced as a result of low birthrates and mass immigration, etc., so everything I said above applies here, even if the politics of the situation are different (Diaspora nation that always had non-Whites and a “nation of immigrants” paradigm). We are told of the wonders of the market economy.  Very well.  Can it find solutions to demographic problems other than the replacement of original populations.

So, it is the same everywhere in the West, in majority White nations. The addiction to mass immigration must be broken.  There is much at stake.

An Interesting Tidbit

Move on, move on, there's nothing to see here.  In all cases, emphasis added.

More Humphrey.  Putting aside Humphrey's particular emphasis there, what do we see? The racial situation for America was grim when that was written and far grimmer today. Why then do the Quota Queens tell us we will win and decry "blackpilling" when non-Nordicists come to the same conclusion as Humphrey? Why do Johnson and McCulloch (a Humphrey protegee) (indirectly) go back and forth as to whether the victory will take 50 years (Johnson's take) or whether that's too long to wait; e.g., McCulloch in TOO:

...it is certainly anticlimactic in the temporal sense, with a gradual process that might take fifty years, a couple of generations, or until well after those opposed to it are dead. Unfortunately, most of those who are in favor of the ethnostate, who presumably worked and fought against seemingly impossible odds to win it—and want to enjoy their victory by living in it—will also be dead. Fifty years is the life expectancy of a 29-year-old man. 

McCulloch is essentially saying he's pissed that he won't be around to see the vaunted White ethnostate. After all, what's most important is not eventually securing the existence of Europeans on the North American continent, but selfishly wanting to "enjoy their victory."

Getting back to my main point - how come realism about our plight is OK when Humphrey does it and Amren regurgitates it, but is "blackpilled" negativism when others express the same opinions?

Let's move on from that bit of "movement" hypocrisy and delve into the realm of "movement" affirmative action. In that same TOO piece, McCulloch writes:

I first met Greg Johnson in 2001 as part of a group of fifteen conference attendees having a late dinner at the Grove Park Inn in Asheville, NC. Dr. Johnson was among those seated at my end of the table. To drop two familiar names, Sam Francis and Jared Taylor were among those seated at the other end.

The Good Old (Nord) Boys Club in action. Note that Taylor (HBD "race realist") and Francis ("paleoconservative") were in a private dinner meeting with radical Nordicist McCulloch. Note also how quickly Johnson rose to be included with such "august personages" - not long after he entered the "movement." But there's no affirmative action, no siree. To understand how early 2001 was in Johnson's journey through Der Movement, see this:

While living in Atlanta, Georgia (in late 1999 or early 2000), Johnson met Joshua Buckley, a former skinhead and the editor of Tyr, a radical Traditionalist journal. In September 2000, Johnson attended a lecture given by British Holocaust denier David Irving. In late 2000, he started to think about founding his own white nationalist journal, but abandoned the idea after the creation of The Occidental Quarterly in 2001.The following year, he joined the faculty of the Pacific School of Religion as a Visiting Assistant Professor of Philosophy and Swedenborgian Studies. In 2007, Johnson became the editor of The Occidental Quarterly, establishing its online version in collaboration with Michael J. Polignano.

So, in 2001, Johnson was in between abandoning the idea of "founding his own white nationalist journal" and joining "the faculty of the Pacific School of Religion as a Visiting Assistant Professor of Philosophy and Swedenborgian Studies."  But he was at a dinner meeting with Taylor, Francis, and McCulloch (all of this assumes McCulloch's recollection is accurate; insofar as I know, neither Taylor nor Johnson has denied the accuracy of this).

Also:

From his introduction I got the impression that Dr. Johnson was an academic doing research on our movement...

That sounds strangely familiar to how Hermansson wormed his way in, including the dinner thing:

In Britain, Mr. Hermansson attended a private dinner of extremists where Greg Johnson, a reclusive leading American far-right figure who is editor in chief of Counter-Currents Publishing...

And, of course, "movement" affirmative action helped there as well:

His Swedish background also helped. Among the groups he frequented were many neo-Nazis who like fascists in the 1930s and 40s, lionise Swedes as an original "unspoilt" version of the Aryan race.

"They believed that people from Scandinavia are more racially pure," he says. "And of course, that was a myth back then, and it's a myth now… but people said to me in very clear words, 'Oh, you are the master race."

Hey, there's no affirmative action, no siree!

By the way, I was "banned" at Counter-Currents after pointing out, in a comment, the fact that "movement" Nordicism facilitated the Hermansson humiliation.  That comment, as you can see, accurately reflected reality, but was enough to get me "banned." Back to McCulloch:

...accompanied by two grad students and a London journalist who was writing a book on political fringe groups. 

I thought we were were not supposed to be "in bed with the press." I don't know the ethnic background of those "two grad students" but we can presume that the "London journalist" was of British stock (if I am wrong, then those involved can correct that error). The journalist was allowed to be there I suppose because the Quota Queens - despite protestations to the contrary - like to use the press to boost their "leadership" credentials to the rank-and-file. It is unclear from McCulloch's writing (and why divulge all of this private information - does this "name dropping" make McCulloch feel ever-so-important?) whether the "two grad students" were associated with Johnson or with the "London journalist" or were there on their own as independent entities (if so, why?). These details aside, the point remains of Johnson's remarkably rapid inclusion amongst the Grand Poobahs, independent of the "writing a book" bait of the "London journalist" (and the uncertain status of the "two grad students").

As I recall, he asked a lot of questions and did a lot of listening.

Yes, after all, anyone just starting out in the "movement" would be there to ask questions of Taylor, Francis, and McCulloch, right?

Since that introduction he has risen to a position of  prominence...

On his livestream with Dickson, Johnson denied he was the beneficiary of any affirmative action, scoffed at it, and labeled me a "paranoid piece of crap" for suggesting it. Johnson averred that he has a PhD and so his inclusion in private dinners and his rapid rise "to a position of prominence" was merely due to his own intellectual brilliance and academic pedigree.  After all, no one else in the "movement" ever had a PhD before him, amirite?

No affirmative action of course, no siree.  

A Gab correspondent who is a friend of this blog has provided more information. See this. That’s the rationale for sticking him right into the middle of Der Movement and its “leaders?”

More on Johnson’s “movement” history:

I think it was Labor Day of 2000 when I took the next step. I went out to a diner in Buckhead where David Irving was going to talk. There were people there, and some of them seemed a little like seedy haters from Hollywood central casting. But you know, I’m one of these essentially liberal-minded White people. I’m open to “the other.” 

Johnson went from that to dinner with Taylor, Francis, and McCulloch in one year. Astonishing.

Also:

This turned out to be Joshua Buckley who is the editor of the journal TYR now. He was an ex-skinhead and really, really intelligent. Pretty much self-educated. High school drop-out, highly intelligent, self-educated guy, ex-skinhead. And he was the first actual concrete person that I met who was on the Right, aside from myself and this friend of mine. I found it really eye-opening. Not just eye-opening, world-opening. This whole world opened up around me…Yeah. He introduced me to the neofolk music scene and a lot of other stuff that I thought was really fascinating. At that point, I kind of made the plunge into not just privately thinking these ideas but not doing anything more . . . Because, essentially, deep down inside I just felt it was all hopeless anyway, right? It’s like the world’s going to hell, and there’s nothing anybody can do. I actually started thinking, “Well, maybe something can be done.” So, I started educating myself and getting more into this.

From that to hobnobbing to top "movement" "leaders" in a flash. 

Re: that last paragraph from Counter-Currents, my Gab correspondent provides the following, which may in part be speculation but likely and reasonable:

Timeline:

Joshua Buckley, was the main business partner of Sam Dickson (who lives in Atlanta Georgia).

Greg meets Joshua Buckley due to shared interest in The Men Who Can't Tell Time -> Greg meets Sam Dickson -> Dickson probably introduces him to William Regenery Jared Taylor Sam Francis etc. All while Greg still posed as Randian Objectivist in public and contributed nothing to WN yet.

Even Spencer was more meritocratic as he had been the editor and writer of Takimag and The American Conservative, which he got due to his years of Conservative activism and the Duke Conservative Union. And had already had a WN website before he got Regenery money to make NPI (which made it bigger).

So, as bad and relatively meritless as Spencer’s elevation was, Johnson’s was far worse.

Johnson's rapid rise in, and maintained status in, Der Movement was for some reason not mimicked by his ex-collaborator, the wop-mick hybrid Polignano, who started in Der Movement around the same time as did Johnson.

Fancy that.

What happened to Patler? Driven to murder (or framed). Tommasi was murdered. Polignano was discussed by Forney and Friberg, re: what happened to him with Johnson. Calabro was attacked behind his back as "racially mixed" and "stealing Northern European women" (I believe his wife was Irish). Conte's throwing other wops under the bus (contrasting the "purity" of his own Calabrian mountain heritage with "mongrel" coastal Sicilians) didn't help him in the end, did it? Sallis is, of course, a "paranoid piece of crap" suffering from "insanity."

If you see any pattern there, then YOU are an "insane paranoid piece of crap."

The relevance of all of this is based on the following:

1. Racial activism for Whites, and hence White well-being, is currently predominantly associated with Der Movement, which has gone from failure to failure.

2. A significant portion of the problem with Der Movement is a failure of leadership.

3. The failure of leadership is in part due to Der Movement’s ethnic affirmative action policy.

4. Therefore, discussion of that policy is important for the future of racial activism and, hence, well-being of our people.

Odds and Ends, 9/28/21

In der news.

Consider two ethnies X and Y. Assume X is significantly admixed and Y is relatively unmixed. If X is used as a reference population in ancestry testing, then other members of X who get tested and who have ancestry profiles similar to the X reference samples will get results of close to, or at, 100% X. Further, if X is considered part of racial group A, then X members who are tested will be considered close to, or at, 100% A – even though they are in fact admixed. On the other hand, if Y is NOT included as a reference sample, then Y members who are tested will be represented as mixtures of groups that ARE in the reference database. Thus, X members who are in reality significantly admixed will rant about their “purity” while looking askance at Y members who seem admixed but who are actually not.

Shh…don’t tell Der Movement.

This is Counter-Currents:

"But whiteness, too, is a mark of degeneracy...My people were Germans...the Great Satan come for them, grinding them down and producing “whites"...part of degenerate sludge...Yes, to be an American, to be a “white,” is tantamount to being a degenerate. "

Carlson on the Great Replacement.  I admit not fully understanding what’s going on with Carlson.  If he was just “controlled opposition” why mention the Great Replacement, and take the chance of triggering Suvorov’s Law via the legitimization of WN discourse?  A cynical view would be that a “right-wing” Jewish-Globalist faction is disturbed by the destabilizing rate of rapid demographic change and the extreme “woke” agenda, worrying that the USA is falling apart faster than expected, that the New Colored Majority won’t be beholden to Jewish interests as are pliable Whites, and that the Trump 2016 victory has raised the bogeyman of a (albeit very unlikely) significant White backlash.  So, they are willing to take the risk of stirring up White agitation in the hopes of warning the “left-wing” faction of the Jewish-Globalist establishment that they should slow down and stop “boiling the frog” so quickly.  Of course, Carlson may just be a sincere independent operator, but cynicism reigns supreme in 2021 America.

Hanson on the Great Replacement. Meanwhile, Gabsters complain about a vaccine.  After all, Jaysus loves the Great Replacement.  Turn the other (butt) cheek, Whitey!

The German who pontificates on who is “White enough” for her “White dating site” has a personal history of race-mixing yarmulke burning:

When I met my half-Jewish very European looking and comfortably wealthy ex-husband…

An excellent response:

Ray Carusosays:

September 22, 2021 at 2:21 pm

When I met my half-Jewish very European looking and comfortably wealthy ex-husband

Treason can’t be undone. Once a traitor, always a traitor.

That German female is a typical Herrenvolk – they make a mistake and then project that unto other people who have absolutely nothing to do with. That race traitor should be banned from racially aware White society.

The Heide case is a test for Der Movement. Let us consider together. Der Movement is Jew-obsessed; according to Der Movement Jews are not White, Jews are THE enemy, they obsess over the possibility of this or that person having any Jewish ancestry whatsoever, they say that White-Jewish mating is race-mixing, they see Jews in every corner - blaming Jews for everything and saying that everything is a Jewish conspiracy. Whether or not I agree or disagree with any of that is immaterial here, the point is that Der Movement fervently believes it. Very well. What will they now do after their darling Heide has not only admitted having a "half"-Jewish husband, but was actually working on the "White dating site" when still married to the Jew? Will the Herrenvolk darling get a pass? Of course she will.

Besides the criticisms of the Amren poll already cited in my post, the methodology leaves something to be desired.  How can you know whether the people in the online poll are being honest about being White?  Is there a mechanism to limit one polling per person?  

Assuming the self-identification and poll-taking are honest: Why not break the data down by ethnicity and religion?

Also note how much more “racially liberal” White women are compared to men.

But my major criticism remains – if you are going to ask questions about healthcare, nuclear power, and other such peripheral issues, why not ask questions that have real-world actionable political implications for pro-White activism, focusing on the reasons that White “racial conservatives” do not support explicit racialist pro-White activism?

Or is that the Quota Queens are afraid to ask such questions because they might not like the answers?

That Etruscan paper writes:

An analogous turnover is observed in Iberia between Iron Age and modern-day populations.

So, on the one hand, the original Etruscans were similar to modern Spaniards in PCA, but on the other hand, Spain underwent similar population turnovers. Without further explanation, that doesn't make much sense.

My explanation (other than that the authors have an axe to grind) is that either the founding Iberian population was an extreme WHG outlier or something else extreme and/or that PCA comparisons are one-sided. In other words, being separated in PCA does imply that groups have different ancestries, but overlapping in PCA does NOT mean that groups have the same ancestries. Similar combinations of gene frequencies along two axes could occur via different demographic processes. I've seen global PCA that have South Asians and Latin Americans in similar positions, due to intermediate positioning between European and Asian/Amerindian axes. In the former it's due to gene frequency clines (and possibly ancient admixture between Iranics, Dravidians, and East Asians) and in the latter case, more recent European-Amerindian admixture. The two populations are in no way really similar.

Also in that paper, the PCA that they like to use (despite flaws) shows the Imperial samples as overlapping modern Southeastern European populations, yet they persist in labeling those as not only "east Mediterranean" but "Near Eastern."

Notice that the Etruscan paper is essentially a German production, with some Italian "junior partners" scurrying along?  Data are one thing (although the data can be controlled via choice of methodology, so even that is not purely objective), but the interpretation is another. There's a subtext there of "mongrel Italy" being "revitalized" by "Germanic blood." One can compare this Etruscan paper to the earlier paper on Ancient Rome.  The overall findings are similar, but the tone is quite different. While the earlier paper suffered from some of the same methodological flaws as the recent one, and also had an underlying "mass migration is normal" SJW tone, it was still more restrained in its interpretations, and lacked the ethnocentric tone as the newer one, which reads in places as if it was at least edited by (if not written by) Gunther-Pierce-Kemp et al.  Again, the overall findings are really no different than what was described here for Rome, yet it has the subtext that I described above.  It would seem that the same ethnic conflicts that occurred on the battlefields of the ancient world are now again playing out in the pages of scientific journals.

Indeed, now that the "the original Romans and Etruscans were Nordic" has been debunked, and despite data associating many of the Imperial samples with present-day Southeastern Europeans, we now observe the narrative shifted to that of "mongrel Italy" being "revitalized" by "Germanic blood."  Of course, in a scientific journal in the year 2021, it is not explicitly stated as such, but comparing the restrained language of the Rome paper to the Prussian bombast of the Etruscan one, the underlying implications are clear.

I make no guarantees that this is accurate.  But, assuming it is, we note which present-day populations are most genetically similar to those of the Classical World.  Note that the Nordic areas of Northern Europe are not genetically similar to the Classical populations.  And while the Imperial period shows increased similarity to the Levant/Near East, the bottom is that all of the periods of the Classical world centers its greatest genetic similarity on Southern Europe, from Spain to Greece (and Crete/Cyprus).  There were shifts in emphasis but it is centered on Southern Europe.

See this. Once again, Derbyshire and his mythical "Arctic Alliance" while Sallis' assertion of a pan-Colored Tropical Alliance is supported.

Quota Queens - wrong.  Sallis - right.  What else is new?

Odds and Ends, 8/28/21

In der news.

High Trusters on the march. Hey, I've long predicted that a "movement" "leader" would be outed as an infiltrator; I thought it would be someone more prominent, but there's still time for that. Note that I am not committing the error I condemn in others of accusing specific people of being "Feds" - merely saying that there is a high probability that some people are - confirmed in this case.

See this.  Der Movement marches on.

The (mostly White) public obsession with zombies in popular culture really took off after the 1965 Immigration Act and has only accelerated with increasing diversity. All the anxiety about invasion and contamination, the shuffling mindless hordes disturbing a once quiet life, it's all there - the rising tide of color as the zombie plague. The White "Man's" response to demographic displacement - instead of opposing the invasion, just watch a horror movie as an analog of your impending doom.

van de Camp's (and other people's) nonsense about "White" Afghans likely has as its genesis an Anglo attitude of "all wogs seem the same to me." After all, if they have to consider "dusky" Italians and Greeks as White, why not Afghans and Hindu Brahmins?

Can you believe this?  This guy regularly makes superfluous, childish insults toward Italian-Americans (and many others), and then pretends not to know what “trolling” is or why people get annoyed by his writing. Either he is lying or is pathologically self-unaware.

And as regards his arguments against “anonymity” and his claims of having answered all defenses of anonymity, see this.  And if he is so offended by “anonymity” he shouldn’t do livestreams with Johnson until Greggy shows his face on camera. Further, is “Nicholas Jeelvy” and “Full Moon Ancestry” the real names of his fellow previous co-livestreamers? He doesn’t like people not being able to face their accuser? Talk to Greggy about banning people from his blog and refusing to debate them. Who is “Trevor Lynch” by the way? Any complaints about “Hood” and “Kirkpatrick?” What a hypocrite.

Actually, I am in the wrong here. I am wrong for wasting my time reading Counter-Currents. I shouldn't even comment on what that guy says, just let him alienate the bulk of Counter-Currents supporters and commentators, who are anonymous. Indeed, Goad's payments from Counter-Currents are being funded by the "D'Nations" from supporters who are mostly anonymous. So, it's all good!

Middle Class TwitAugust 26, 2021 at 4:45 am

Does the editor have anything to say on this subject?

I ask since one of the instructions to people wanting to sign up for the paywall is to give their “Desired username (this should not be your real name)”.

Reply

Nick JeelvyAugust 26, 2021 at 5:14 am

Presumably, you’re not using your counter-currents paywall privileges for trolling.

Sorry, Nick (your real name, no doubt), Goad's criticisms of anonymity, which have occurred before, are more broad-based, and not only about trolling. He previously attacked Jef Costello for using a pseudonym - not for trolling but merely for criticizing Goad's writing.

Thus, "Middle Class Twit" asks a legitimate question and Jeelvy is being dishonest.

I'll say one more thing on this subject for now. Some people who engage in online anonymity today actually DID engage in real-world, real name, face-to-face, open activism back in the day. Some people had skin in the game, literally. But then they grew up, matured, and realized that the "movement" is (and always has been) a pathetic joke, populated to a large extent by freaks, infiltrators, and grifters, with "leaders" who are absolutely useless for anything other than taking money from gullible people. Given that reality, taking a step back made good sense.

I'll say this - let all the Grand Poobahs of the "movement" - you know all the folks who get the big "executive compensation" money - build a real genuine movement, something worth sacrificing for, something with a real chance for victory, and some of those old analog activists will come out of "semi-retirement" and get openly involved again. Good luck with that.

It’s interesting that most of the people attacking anonymity are full-time activists/writers whose livelihoods depend on the generosity of anonymous supporters. Although their inane drivel is offensive in its hypocrisy, it is a good thing that people like Goad and Morgan alienate the same people whose donations pay their salaries. It would be fitting if all those supporters vote with their wallets and stop donating to Counter-Currents.  I doubt they have the self-respect to do so, but we can always hope. Then the critics can go out in the real world and actual do real work for a living.

Laugh at this.  But, hey, deciding who you want to sell or rent your home to is not your "personal choice" and not your "freedom" and if you violate Federal Civil Rights laws by exercising your freedom of association, don't be surprised if a good old boy wearing a cowboy hat comes to arrest you.

Some of us remember when Gaslighting Greg was taking a more responsible and fact-based anti-flubro position on Twitter and was debating the likes of Gariepy and Anglin on the issue. These days, Counter-Currents has become a haven for the most absurd conspiritard flubro nonsense.

Is it because Johnson has changed his mind? If so, he's an idiot, since there's no rational reason for some of the absolute nonsense that passes for content on this issue at his blog. I've never said he was stupid, and I find it hard to believe he actually really believes any of the utter irrational garbage there.

Is it because he just wants to have free speech at his blog, even when people disagree with his positions? That's laughable, given his propensity to censor people he disagrees with, to ban critics, and avoid debate with people more capable than Gariepy/Anglin by labeling those potential opponents as insane.

Or is it simply that a sane and empiricist position on covid and the vaccine was a "losing" position for him in Der Movement, and it is more lucrative to just cynically cater to the stupidity of Der Retards and reap the "D'Nations" benefits?

Laugh at this. “Medically raped.” That 100% confirms my previous comments that opposition to vaccination has a psychosexual component centered on the fact that a (phallic) needle is “penetrating” the patient. “The Jew doctor is trying to sodomize me with a covid jab!” Statin pills are, of course, OK. Given that the typical Retard of Der Right looks like John Candy, I suppose that is understandable. After all, you are not getting "medically raped" by a pill.

Odds and Ends, 6/30/21

In der news.

One gets tired of this nonsense.

I’ve answered moronic “analyses” like this many times; I’ll just make three brief points here:

1. Mixed-race people are not “White” by any reasonable definition. One can of course re-define “White” to mean anything you want, but then one can define anything to mean anything else. Whites are allowed to have a European racial and cultural identity without others trying to define those identities out of existence.

2. Excusing these redefinitions of “White” based on the past private definitions of Nordicists and Anglocentrics is doubly wrong. First, legally speaking, at the federal level, it was ALWAYS the case that all Europeans were considered “White” with respect to immigration, citizenship, inter-marriage, etc. In some ways, the old definition may have been even wider than it was today – at one time South Asians were “White” and, unfortunately, Jews were always legally considered ‘White.” Second, just because strange definitions and understandings existed among some people in the past doesn’t mean we are obligated to accept equally bizarre definitions and understandings today. At one time, people thought that whales were fish. They were wrong. That doesn’t mean we should, today, accept salmon as whales.

3. It is the job of demographic analysts to provide disinterested evaluation of objective data. It is not their job to try and convince Whites that their dispossession is nothing to worry about.  Everything in academia and “science” and policy has become political, and the politics are always anti-White.

Guide for the perplexed:

Dear Mr. Adams -

I wasted decades of my life on a "movement" that despises my ethnicity, that is "led" by inept affirmative action grifters, and that demonstrates zero judgment, strategic thinking, and honorable behavior. What should I do?

- Swartface

Getting back to the Adams post and the workplace advice - there needs to be more context. If the person is aggressively proselytizing at the job - that's one thing and Adams' advice is sound. If the job is not at all directly connected to sociopolitical aspects and it is merely an issue of several "diversity training" sessions - fine again. But what if the person is involved in the political realm, or is a teacher, an academic, or any sort of other job that actually entails being forced to actively repeat and promote "wokeness?"  What if the person's free speech rights and/or academic freedom rights are being violated?  What if they are asked to break the letter of the law by engaging in frank anti-White discrimination?  What then?  Should they continue to be fully compliant and prudent?  And what is the endgame?  Should one be prudent to infiltrate the System?  To acquire "intelligence?" Or to merely go along to get along and maybe be a lurker or pseudononymous commentator at some "movement" website?  Or just to give "D'Nations" to frauds and grifters?

I'm not saying Adams is right or wrong. I'm saying it depends on context and that the advice - like so much coming from Der Movement - completely lacks nuance.

Writing worth paying for!

His imprisonment sadly prevented him from fulfilling his pledge to “eat his own dick” if Bitcoin didn’t hit $1 million before the end of 2020…A lot of people think McAfee was awesome for snorting bath salts, banging hookers, marrying a black hooker, and living in international waters in order to evade capture by the American government…

…Personally, I had no strong opinion of the guy one way or the other. I caught his 2016 run for the Libertarian Party presidential nomination, just as I was evolving out of libertarianism…

How come I’m not surprised by the “libertarianism.”  Has even one person emerged out of libertarianism that has been worth a damn for pro-White activism?

…failing to eat his dick when Bitcoin didn’t reach $1 million at the end of 2020, giving some good tips about cybersecurity, talking about shoving his arm up women’s asses…

…There’s supposed to be some super-secret info contained in that Instagram post…

…Just as Jeffrey Epstein didn’t kill himself, so was JFK not shot by a lone gunman…

No, it was Colonel Mustard with the candlestick.

…What if government malfeasance doesn’t rely on covering up, distorting, or presenting false facts to the public, or at least doesn’t solely rely on such distortions, but rather, relies on distorting the processes by which people think so that no skullduggery would be necessary to conceal malfeasance? Malfeasance would simply be done in the open and the people could be conditioned to ignore it, or even love it. 

OK, here Jeelvy and I agree.  Even a stopped clock is right twice a day.

Some constructive criticism for Griffin – and I’m serious here, not sarcastic or facetious. If you are going to do fundraising, I would not present it like this:

…so I want to go ahead and start raising some money to offset the cost of my son’s annual tuition. He is growing up fast and will be starting second grade this year. Anything you can chip in to help would be much appreciated.

First, it is not a good idea to discuss private matters on a public site that is obviously read by the opposition.  Second, it is not a good “look” to present the fundraising in terms of needing money for private, lifestyle issues.  All you need to say is “I need money to defray living expenses, to support myself and my family” – and even the second part of that is not strictly necessary.

Odds and Ends, 6/20/21

In der news.

Refuting Nordicist liar (a redundancy) "Desmond Jones." Look at Iberia, Italy, Bulgaria, Romania - and France of course is in between North and South. The idea that only Northern Europe is demographically threatened is an outright lie.

See this. Who were the "race scum" of the East that the heroic Germans were going to destroy and replace? Russians? Ukrainians?

Then we have guys like GW telling us how difficult WN is, for example in America. How does he know? IT HAS NEVER BEEN TRIED. All we get is warmed over Nutzi Nordicism and Germanocentric Hitlerism and/or WASP animus to "White ethnics."

See this. Note the bit about homosexuality. Is that perhaps a clue to Powell’s popularity among the “handbags at dawn” Alt Right?

Interesting discussion. Interesting that even at a podcast hosted by the pro-free speech Academic Freedom Alliance, SJW speech restrictionist perspectives filter in. The debate, it seems, is to what degree should academia be SJW – mild hysteria, or full blue-haired fatty hysteria?

Disgusting self-interested gaslighting.

...since I intend to be around for many years to come.

Bad news.

“Movement” “leaders” like Johnson need to peddle false optimism, because if his followers get too discouraged, then the “D’Nations” will dry up. Further, an honest appraisal of the sad state of today’s “movement” would lead to calls for accountability for the failed Quota Queens and their inept “leadership,” and we can’t have that! No sir! So, he’ll take a few (alleged) comments from readers, which do not get to the real problems and manifest failures of the “movement” (that I cover at EGI Notes on a regular basis), and then knocks down these strawmen. Another transparently mendacious performance from Gaslighting Greg.

The fact is that whatever good that has been happening - and it's not much - has been in despite of, not because of, the retarded "movement" and its inept affirmative action "leaders." The chaos and balkanization from Trump and the growth of right-wing populism in some precincts of the "normie" Right has been somewhat helpful. I suppose that some Whites are being modestly "radicalized" to the Right as a reaction to BLM, CRT, "wokeness," etc. But those are political and social currents for the most part not directly connected to the "movement." If Der Movement had done the right thing during the Trump years, such as quietly building in depth behind the scenes, it would be better positioned to take advantage of all that is going on today. But, no. The Beavis-and-Butthead Alt Right stupidly "acted out," and the remaining "leaders" and their sycophants are useless freakshows and grifters. The reality is that, considering so-called "White well-being," the "normie" pushback against "wokeness" - including that from traditional liberals and former "democratic socialists" - has been more useful, by far, than "movement" antics.

Der Movement ejaculates (although the mention of the Italian may induce flaccidity).

Better than Viagra.

Remember my theory of autism – that bizarre alien phenotypes, particularly those of NECs/South Asians, were shocking the amygdalas of vulnerable White children, thus precipitating the disorder?  Can you doubt it?  The face that launched a thousand autisms.

True story. I once had a well-known activist, who shall go nameless here, someone who posed as a pan-Europeanist, tell me that the ancient Romans were Nordic, and that the “proof” of this was that Augustus Caesar “looked like British actor James Mason,” and that “Julius Caesar was going bald, and only Northern European men lose their hair.”  I kid you not.

I'm not going to reveal the name of that "well-known activist," but I can tell you that it was not Pierce.

Fetishists weep. Liddell has a nervous breakdown.

Also see this.

I believe that the reality is somewhere in between the mainstream narrative and the links above. On the one hand, where there’s smoke there’s fire; the reputation of Italian military ineptness has some basis in fact. On the other hand, that reputation has been over-inflated and taken out of context. Consider WWII. Allied with Germany and very poorly equipped, the Italian military lasted in the field for ~ three years before surrender.  In contrast, allied with the British Empire and much better equipped, the French military lasted in the field for ~ six weeks before surrender. And just because the French were allowed, for political reasons, to piggyback on D-Day, and ended up on the winning side, does not excuse the complete catastrophe of 1940. The French have a certain military reputation over the last 150 years that cannot be ignored.  Not everyone is as militarily efficient as, say, Germany used to be. Is that criticism of the French also over-inflated and taken out of context?  Perhaps.  But what goes around comes around. Every ethny should be held to the same standards.

Immigration marches on.

Sunday News

In der news.

Read the article and then the comments.

And then remember Johnson and McCulloch debating about when our glorious victory will take place. And then we have the God Emperor as President that all these “leaders” have lauded.  Who can argue with the results?

The Hobbit Hole in the Ethnostate awaits!  MAGA!

Meanwhile, sane and responsible people consider contingencies for the future.

But, of course, those responsible individuals should be ignored.  Because, well…you know. Der Movement, Inc. (a money-making enterprise) has a far more all-encompassing and strict affirmative action program than the System could ever dream of.

Let’s consider the absurdly homoerotic Trump fanboy Roissy, who is – 3.5 years too late – just beginning to get some skepticism about his hero:

Finally, we must at least entertain the possibility that Trump doesn’t really disagree with the turncoats in his midst. Jared’s machinations on behalf of neoliberal globalism? Ivanka’s tears for baby beanlets? Kellyanne’s rude treatment of Trump’s most loyal supporters? Maybe they ARE on the same page as Trump.

This is precisely the case, and if Retard Roissy had ended his post there, you’d think that maybe, just maybe, there’s some hope for the deluded Quota Queen.  But, alas, no.

I doubt it…

Of course not.  Trump can go on National TV and issue a directive for all White people (excepting himself and Praying Mantis-Head) to be gassed and made into soap and guys like Roissy will still support him.

…but if Trump doesn’t execute a course correction soon — starting with pink slips to the enemies of MAGA mentioned above — then what’s gonna happen is a hardening of black pilled opinions about Trump, and a rapid retreat of his 2020 reelection odds

Hmmm.  You think?  Since Trump is NOT going to execute a course direction – the only think he’ll be executing is the latest cheeseburger going down his fat-encrusted gullet – then Roissy’s prediction will come to pass.

Something to think about:

The CIA is generally conceived to operate primarily abroad, but this, one former counterintelligence official put it, is a “fantasy.” The domestic operational arm of the CIA, known today as the National Resources (NR) Division, maintains warm ties with industry leaders in Silicon Valley, Hollywood, Wall Street and beyond; voluntarily debriefs business people, scientists and other U.S. citizens returning from trips abroad; and tries to recruit foreign nationals on American soil, such as student visa holders, to work for the U.S. government. (Current CIA Director Gina Haspel previously served as deputy director for the NR Division.)

Gee, now it is a problem.  Before, it was all going with the plan.  Will the indolent Trump start cracking down on the HuWhite Sacklers…after all, we can’t have nice Black folk dying on us now, can we?

They still don’t get it.

Donald Trump, Jr. has been tweeting furiously about this case. He should tell his father to do something to stop these kinds of cases.

I wonder if the Quota Queens are actually mentally retarded.  Seriously. First, the idea of Trump “doing something” – other than stuffing his fat face with a cheeseburger – is ludicrous.  Second, what makes any of you think Trump cares about this, or anything else other than himself and his Praying Mantis-headed older daughter?  And to the limited extend that Trump may – may – have an electron-sized concern for public matters, he’s a leftist.

Der Movement Inc. must be deconstructed and replaced, it has become a haven for the trisomy 21 crowd.

Blackpill Friday

Der Friday.

Gee, even the Alt Lite is abandoning Antifa Don Trump.  Soon, all he’ll have left is Roissy’s fervid onanism… and all those Big Macs to eat.

Spencer is being rather Sallis-like in his latest tweets, with comments about Trump, the Alt Right, and the “let’s be run out of a LA bar by a bunch whose combined bench press is 10 lbs." Proud Boys.

The absolutely despicable Brimelow continues to use his children as props for his money-making website.  And it seems that Sallis is the only one willing to call him out on it.  What an honorable “movement” indeed!  If you can learn anything from Codreanu and the Legionary movement, it is the importance of character, the need for “New Men” as more important than new memes or new programs or new dogmas. Until racial activism has quality people rather than money-grubbing grifters, it is not going anywhere productive.  But then, Codreanu was just some hora-dancing Romanian, and not a superior product like Brimelow, so move along, move along, there’s nothing to see here.

The System waves its hands around.

Dr. Myers and a colleague later found that presenting the data differently could produce a much less anxious reaction. In work published this spring, they found that the negative effects that came from reading about a white decline were largely erased when the same people read about how the white category was in fact getting bigger by absorbing multiracial young people through intermarriage.

Rewritten for analogical clarity:

Dr. Myers and a colleague later found that presenting the data differently could produce a much less anxious reaction. In work published this spring, they found that the negative effects that came from reading about a decline in the amount of white paint required to paint a house were largely erased when the same painters read about how the amount of available white paint was in fact getting bigger by absorbing black paint thrown into the white paint container by vandals.

After all, you increase the amount of something by destroying it.  Makes sense.  Don't forget, paint color is purely socially constructed, and a home owner wanting their house painted white wouldn’t mind at all if it turns out to be gray instead. 

At this point, only Roissy finds this childish behavior amusing.

“This country is so much stronger now than it was when I took office that you wouldn’t believe it,” Trump continued. “I mean, you see it, but so much stronger that people can’t even believe it. When I see foreign leaders they say, ‘We cannot believe the difference in strength between the United States now and the United States two years ago.’ Made a lot of progress.”

I’m never going to let Der Movement forget that when they were spontaneously ejaculating over their “last chance for White America God Emperor” I was labeling him a vulgar ignorant buffoon and a race cuck fraud, and stated that the ONLY reason to vote for him is that the deranged public perception of Trump as a “racist fascist bigot” was wonderfully inflaming racial tensions.

Now, someone was right and someone was wrong.  As always.

As always.

Sallis vs. Sailer on the Census

Sailer’s HBDite stupidity.

Those who read Sailer often see his “Flight from White” ramblings about the US Census.  Steverino is opposed to Middle Eastern North African (MENA) being a separate category from “White” – he wants the MENA folks lumped in with Euro-Americans.  He has also criticized the fact that South Asians have already been removed from the “White” category due to South Asian ethnic lobbying (similarly, the MENA crowd are actively lobbying for the same).  Sailer notes that these groups in the past wanted to be counted as “White,” but now that Whites are a subaltern “untouchable” group in today’s Jewish-Colored Supremacist America, the NECs want to flee as fast away from “White” as possible.”

However, the point has to be: what is best for America and more specifically what is best for Whites – Euro-Americans?  I do not remember Sailer ever clearly stating (at least at VDARE – I don’t care about the Unz site) why having NECs counted as White is something desirable.  Trying to parse Sailer’s “writings” I conclude that he believes that if MENAs and South Asians are “binned” as “White” then they will (be forced to) identify politically with Whites and White interests, reinforcing the power of the majority and its interests.  The fact that these groups were (South Asians) or are (MENAs) grouped with Whites and certainly reject any sort of “White” identity, political or otherwise, somehow escapes Sailer.  That the Jews have always been politically counted as “White” and have been the greatest enemy White Americans have ever had also escapes Sailer’s HBD brilliance.

Sailer confuses cause and effect.  He apparently believes that how people are categorized in the census affects how they consider themselves in a racial-social sense.  This is clearly not the case.  Instead, the reality is that how people consider themselves in the racial-social sense determines how they want to be categorized in the census.  There’s also crypsis involved: while Jews do not consider themselves “White” in the same sense Euro-Americans do, Jews also have an instinctive urge for crypsis, to want to hide their alieness, made easier for most Ashkenazi since the typical mind-benumbed White gentile cannot identify obvious Jews (but usually can identify gentile Middle Easterners, South Asians, etc.).  So, for the most part, Jews are content to be legally “White” despite not really considering themselves so; on the other hand, (non-Jewish) MENAs and South Asians have no desire for crypsis and for the most have part no chance of being successful at crypsis even if they were so inclined.

So, Sailer’s wrong-headed ramblings on this subject are his typical “look how clever I am posturing” in which he usually ends up looking like a pompous idiot (in other words, an HBDer).

There are real costs to Sailer’s agenda here, costs for Whites.  Binning MENAs (including Jews by the way) as “White,” never mind doing the same for South Asians, obfuscates, masks, and hides the degree of real demographic change, artificially inflates White numbers, and dampens down something that any White racialist (as opposed to an anti-White HBDer) wants to see occur: a strong White reaction against demographic displacement.  Here Sailer is on the same page as the System, as the Left, which wants to calm White fears, promote an “anyone can become White” storyline, and postpone White political reaction to race replacement reality.

We need to know the real demographic facts on the ground, no matter how harsh, instead of indulging in deadly fantasies that say that if a previously White town becomes transformed into a holding pen for Syrian refugees, then no demographic change has taken place.

Euro-Americans should have their own category.  Indeed, we should drill down even deeper.  Even with intra-White mating blurring ethnic boundaries, it would still be useful to know how many White Americans identify as various ethnic groups, etc.  Knowledge is good, as they say.  And contra Sailer, asking people if they identify as German-American is not going to lead to a revival of the Bund.  

Short summary: observe what it is that the HBDers recommend and support the opposite.

Eternity Lost: Solving the Fermi Paradox

The Sallis solution.

Read this.

And this.

I propose a novel solution to the Fermi Paradox.  It is typical for people to envision sentient alien species as monolithic, as monoracial populations – think of the “alien grays” who are portrayed as phenotypically fungible. What if this assumption is incorrect?  Perhaps racial diversity is the rule among sentient species; thus, highly divergent human racial types find their counterparts in significant racial variability among the alien peoples inhabiting worlds unknown. I further propose a Gresham’s law of universal racial diversity: the more intelligent and productive races of any sentient species will tend to be demographically outcompeted by the more stupid and useless races; the latter, despite their deficiencies for proximate values, are inevitably more fit with respect to the ultimate criterion of survival.  The threshold of technological competence for a detectable alien civilization would no longer obtain as the race or races capable of maintaining that civilization are replaced by those incapable.  Therefore, no such civilizations are detected.

So, perhaps, a gracile and intelligent space-faring light gray alien race has been demographically replaced by a brutal and stupid dark gray race, the members of which are swinging from the trees among the ruins of a collapsed Dyson sphere civilization.  The same would hold for other failed alien cultures, and if human civilization collapses, the likely cause would be similar.

And so it goes…