EGI Once Again

Considerations.

We can first consider some of the points made in this post; I am not going to comment on the description of ethnic genetic interests (EGI), which I have discussed many times in the past, but rather the policy implications, as well as how the EGI concept is viewed by different groups.

“Mainstream” discussions about immigration, race, and the implications of a multiracial society usually consider only secondary questions such as economics, crime, culture, etc. They ignore the ultimate interest of a people: genetic continuity. No rational person would support policies that would, on the one hand, “enrich” their family while, on the other hand, simultaneously replace their family with strangers. And yet we seem to completely ignore the large scale effects of public policies on our greater “extended family”–the racial and ethnic groups to which we belong.

That description accurately describes the attitude of the Mainstream Right toward immigration, race, and multiracial multiculturalism. That is not surprising and to be expected from what is essentially merely the right-wing of the anti-White System. Unfortunately, there are elements on the Far Right who can be described in like manner. On the “left” of the Far Right are the civic nationalist right-wing populists, who may in fact not actually be part of the Far Right proper, but who populate a nebulous border zone between the Mainstream Right and the Far Right.  And then we have the HBDers, who would be content with White racial replacement, as long as the replacers are “high-IQ” Jews and Asians. Some of these aberrant views are critiqued here.

Even more bizarre are those on the Far Right (for example) who are not civic nationalists and not really HBDers either (but who are unfortunately powerfully influenced by HBD mendacity) but who reject the concept of ethnic genetic interests, which essentially leaves them in a position not really different from the aforementioned misguided (or mendacious) rightist groups.

From the standpoint of genetic interests, the idea that “immigration makes up for low native birthrates” is pathological. The assertion that immigrants must be imported for “economic” reasons, or for some other short-sighted rationale, is therefore exposed as incredibly destructive to the interests of the natives.

One of the fundamental pillars of modern conservatism, and of the modern non-racial Right in general, is economics. The strong strain of libertarianism that runs through the modern Right is consistent with this. The neoconservative infection of the Right is also strongly associated with “economics over all” at least with respect to domestic affairs (with the well-being of Israel, and defending liberal globalism, as prime foreign policy objectives). An EGI-based viewpoint therefore incompatible with the underlying ideology of much of “conservative” “thought.” Of course, paleoconservatism and associated civic nationalism and right-wing populism do consider issues of national identity and culture, and do not focus, as does mainstream conservatism, on economics.  But even these bastions of a somewhat healthier Right tend to shy away from a more biological, ancestry-based perspective on fundamental interests.

Any consideration of the costs vs. benefits of immigration–or of a multiracial society in general–must absolutely consider the costs incurred at the most basic, most personal, and most fundamental human level. After all, humans are living, breathing organisms–”economic growth” or other issues are important only insofar as they influence real, living humans and human interests. A people do not “benefit” from “X” if “X” results in that people’s displacement and their replacement by others to an extent equivalent to mass murder.

That applies to “cognitive elitism” and “high IQ immigration” as it does other non-kinship considerations.

Genetically, mass alien immigration is genocide. Similarly, a multicultural, multiracial society that manages the demographic eclipse of its majority population is also practicing genocide. These are facts which cannot be responsibly evaded.

Unfortunately, the entire mainstream political spectrum – and a significant portion of dissident politics – evades those facts and refuses to consider the legitimacy of “racist” EGI-based arguments.

No, the ultimate causes of Western decline are that the governments and “leaders” of the West are openly and actively betraying the interests of their own peoples, and that the peoples of the West themselves, all too comfortable and unconcerned with their own demise, are seemingly uninterested in defending their interests. Or is it that Westerners are grossly uninformed about where their real interests lie?

As mentioned above, there are many on the Right, including the Far Right, who are equally uninformed and, in some cases, aggressively hostile to the interests of the peoples of the West because they champion competing, incompatible ideologies (e.g., HBD).

Thus, this essay has three basic purposes. First, to introduce the fundamentally important concept of genetic interests–which are ultimate interests–to Western peoples. 

How best to do so?  See below for the endless difficulties in what should have been a “slam dunk.”

Second, to explain, succinctly but precisely, what is at stake: the demographic decline of an entire people, with a consequent devastating personal loss for each and every member of that people. 

How to do so?  I have written about this in the past and I plan to do so in future posts. In theory, this could be a two-tier approach. First, the full, complete EGI paradigm would be targeted to (potentially) receptive White political and intellectual elites. Second, for more general consumption, the paradigm can be put into the language of family to make the analogy.  Of course, there can be some overlap.  Particularly if the masses are targeted with anti-EGI propaganda, with various pseudoscientific refutations, then some of the more scientific information would have to be dispensed. But with respect to Whites in general that should be kept to the minimum required to effectively make the argument.  The “man in the street” is not going to be particularly interested in questions of genetic distances and “child equivalents.”

A major problem, as is clear from what is written above, is that advocates of EGI have been unable to convince even the “movement” of the importance of the concept; indeed, there has been considerable resistance among those who you would think would be most receptive to the message. Part of this is due to the perfidious HBD infestation of pro-White activism, part of it is just the typical “movement” stupidity and obtuseness; however, EGI advocates it seems have not hit upon the right approach to propagate the message. This problem needs a solution and requires thoughtful analysis.

Third, to encourage Western peoples, so informed, to engage in legal, peaceful, non-violent, and rational sociopolitical activism to pursue their genetic interests. Which means: to ensure their own survival.

Sometimes one wonders if they want to survive. Why must a people need to be endlessly convinced and virtually browbeaten into defending their own interests, their very survival?  There is something seriously wrong there,

What is required is the practice of biopolitics –the fusion of biological, human concerns with political action and public policy initiatives. Westerners need to stop focusing exclusively on secondary issues such as economics and economic growth, “cultural assimilation,” employment opportunities, funding for pensions, and a myriad of other concerns which–while certainly important and certainly worthy of interest and consideration–pale in significance compared to the ultimate problem of demographic displacement.

See above.  The mainstream Right focuses solely on secondary issues that which for the Right are “primary.”  Ultimate issues are “racist” and hence “beyond the pale.”

Survival comes first. All else comes second. Genetic interests come first. Other interests come second. Biopolitics will reorder priorities in the recognition that the well being of the Peoples of the West first requires that these peoples continue to exist. Biopolitics will ensure that they do.

Biopolitics will do so only if the ideas are accepted, which will require those ideas to be formulated in a palatable fashion to the intended audiences and also if attacks on the ideas are effectively refuted.

Amren Follies, October 2021

Yellow supremacists in action. In all cases, emphasis added. 

This is American Renaissance:

Whites must pay reparations to chinese americans for chinese exclusion act

The model minority belongs in America.

Posted on October 29, 2012

A Conversation with Arthur Jensen

American Renaissance, August and September 1992

Jared Taylor: Well, it seems to me that if there are two racial groups that can live side by side in harmony, it appears to be whites and Asians.

After all, Sammy says we MUST accept "Rosie and the kids."

Using sources I have found on American Renaissance I have documented that Orientals have lower crime rates than whites of all kinds of crimes. The number of Chinese who are spies for Communist China is very small. The vast majority of Chinese who come to the United States from the mainland of China come to get away from the Communist dictatorship.

When I lived in downtown San Jose, California I lived "side by side" with Vietnamese. I enjoyed it.

The question is: Why SHOULD we have to live side by side with Asians?

Because they are Americans just like you are. If you disapprove of their presence you can always relocate to a "whiter" part of this great nation.

That they commit their share of crimes is a carefully concealed reality.

And, of course, Euro-Americans never commit crimes. Things like La Cosa Nostra, Murder, Inc., the Russian mob are simply fictional, right?

Just like we're expected to PRETEND Asians have not been conducting espionage against America since Mao came into power.

The people who commit such crimes are small relative to the entire Chinese-American population. The Chinese, like most immigrants, come here simply to work, send their kids to school and hope for a good outcome. Whats so hard to understand about that?"

American Renaissance commentator defends Asians by implicitly threatening someone critical of Asians:

What would your students say if they could read your comments?

The "Renaissance" in "American Renaissance" apparently describes the Asian conquest of America and of the West.

Amren = All Asia, all the time.

American Renaissance commentator response to uppity Whites who dare to criticize Asian immigration:

Would you use the phrase "taken by" if European immigrants moved in?

The purpose of American Renaissance is, it seems, to support Asian dispossession of Whites.

The American Renaissance "take" on Asian immigration:

Now you have more culinary choices & don't have to go to a major metro area to try ethnic foods.

Amren = All Asia, all the time.  ALL THE TIME.

It's becoming quite clear, is it not? American Renaissance is emerging as one of the leading anti-White Asian supremacist sites on the Internet.

Source material, selected comments from here.

The ideal Amren candidate - an Asian-NW Euro mongrel. True enough, better if it was East Asian instead of South Asian, with a bit of Jew mixed in as well.  Sailer's Jeurasian future. HBD!

Odds and Ends, 10/16/21

In der news.

Frank Capra directs Jimmy Stewart movies that celebrate Old Stock Americans and the Traditional America.

Ang Lee directs a movie showing Old Stock American cowboys as butt-fucking homosexuals.

Guess which one is the "junior partner of the Jews" to "defame Nordics."

Classic example of "First they came for..."

First they came for the WN Nutzis, and suburban cuckservatives did nothing (or maybe actually applauded).

Then, they came for Trumpian Alt Righters, and the suburban cuckservatives clucked a bit but did nothing.

Finally, they sent the FBI against suburban cuckservatives at school board meetings.

You sow selfish inaction, and you reap government persecution.

In his essays on homosexuality, Andrew Joyce effectively debunked the tired trope that asserts that someone who criticizes a behavior (such as homosexuality) “secretly wants to do it themselves.”  Joyce is of course correct. Imagine applying that silly idea to other behaviors.  If you critique someone having a Chinese wife and mixed-race children, that means you secretly want to marry and reproduce with (and engage in “measured groveling” to) Ms. Wei Fuk Yu. If you cite someone’s stated desire to get a blowjob from a dachshund that means you have amorous intentions toward Fido.  I suppose you can’t condemn pedophilia or mass murder either, because, well, you know.  The concept is stupid and childish and it is not surprising that those involved in a stupid and childish “movement” perpetuate that meme.

See this.

Biden will almost certainly be “removed” within the next 12 months…

On the one hand, given Biden’s rapid cognitive decline, one would not be completely surprised if he must leave office in a year, but the absolute certainty in the statement is moronic and displays the attitude that I so despise in Der Movement.  If this person is right, he’ll remind of his prediction and crow about it; if he’s wrong, we’ll never hear about it again – another statement of “movement” certitude that proved wrong. We’ll see on October 13, 2022.  One would think that the Democrats would do anything possible to avoid this scenario before the 2022 mid-terms, as it would be politically damaging –not only is Harris an unpopular giggling buffoon, but the scenario would underscore that the Democrats knowingly nominated a dementia case for the Presidency.  Whatever happens, to make predictions with absolute certitude reflects the piss-poor judgment that has led Der Movement from one failure to another.

Three points:

1. A possible scenario is that the Chinese, knowing that they would be hit hard by covid-19, did not want to be at a competitive economic and military disadvantage compared to other nations not so hit, so they intentionally allowed international travel to infect other nations as quickly as possible.

2. The political nature of HBD is underscored by this crisis. If the virus had escaped from a lab in, say, Rome, Naples, or Palermo, we would have observed a never-ending series of HBD articles blaming the pandemic on Italian "low-IQ, anxiety, and neurosis." In the case of China, however, they actively collaborated on spreading false narratives about an "American bioweapon" and/or ignored all Chinese culpability in the incident. Similarly, the HBDers got all hot and bothered over Schettino, but ignored a Korean captain doing the same.

3. Perhaps one day, the 2020 election fraud will end up like the Wuhan lab leak - originally dismissed as a "right-wing conspiracy theory" and "fake news" but eventually shown to be true.

Against the Amren Asian Argument

A riposte.

Some try to justify the slavish Asian-worship at American Renaissance (Amren) by asserting that Amren is simply arguing that the fact that Asians have a high IQ and are so successful in America refutes the idea that "America is a White supremacist country and that IQ tests are biased in favor of Whites." In other words, the success of Asians "proves" that Negro failure is due to Negro deficiencies, not because of "White supremacy" or pro-White bias.  Further, it is asserted that this is an effective argument and we should support Amren in making it.

Does this argument actually convince anyone other than those who already believe in it? Blacks and the Left will simply counter-argue that Negro failure is due to a specific "legacy of slavery" and the "history of Jim Crow" and "400 years of White racism attacking Black bodies." The Hereditarian Left, so beloved of Devlin, will argue that Negro deficiencies mean that we need to do more to help Blacks. Asians will be outraged that they are being "fetishized" as "model minorities" and that "White racists" are "using Asians" to "disrupt the solidarity of oppressed peoples of color" (a group that includes both Blacks and Asians). Cuckservatives will argue that Blacks simply need to adopt the "hard-working culture of Asians."  Moderates and many "good Whites" in general will just "point and sputter," denounce the Amren argument as "racist," make excuses for Blacks, and use social pricing to punish those who aver that Negro deficiencies are innate and heritable. As regards White people on the Right who already accept the idea of important heritable racial differences, the Amren argument will convince those Whites that Asians are their superior, we need more Asian immigration, and White-Asian intermarriage is good. The Amren argument is profoundly destructive; it is so obviously destructive that one wonders why it is being constantly promoted.

A friend of this blog, posting on Gab, suggested that one reason why the Herrenvolk supported affirmative action for Blacks and Hispanics was to impede the upward mobility of White ethnics, who lived in urban areas and competed with Coloreds for positions and whose upward mobility was seen as a threat to Herrenvolk socioeconomic and political power and dominance.

Is something similar happening in Der Movement? Now, I don't want to be an "insane paranoid piece of crap" but haven't you noticed that HBD, which says that White ethnics are stupid, became popular among Herrenvolk in Der Movement at the same time that significant numbers of White ethnics started joining Der Movement? Is the promotion of HBD a way of stifling the upward mobility of White ethnics in the "movement?" Is defaming White ethnics as stupid mongrels a way of ensuring continued Quota Queen affirmative action dominance in pro-White activism?

There's also the possibility that personal aesthetic preferences play a role here as well.  Some folks undoubtedly prefer to hobnob with erudite Jews like Weissberg or with "smart" Asians like "Rosie" than with uncouth White ethnics like Sallis.

Statement on HBD

In the end, treason never prospers.

Non-Whites (including Jews), as well as Whites married to non-Whites, naturally have as an objective opposing pan-European racial nationalism. These non-Whites and race-mixers naturally have an interest in dividing Whites; they do not want Whites to form a unified group that can effectively compete with, challenge, and oppose non-White interests. Hence, non-Whites (Asians, Jews, Negroes, etc.) have long leveraged HBD and its various permutations to divide Whites, pitting Northwest Europeans, Southern Europeans, and Eastern Europeans against each other, using memes, paradigms, and invented "facts" that have been demonstrated to be wrong and/or misinterpreted.

So why these non-Whites and race-mixers do it is obvious; the more pressing question is to explain why some Whites on the Right actively collaborate. These traitors have a variety of motives (besides that some of them are childishly stupid and easily manipulated). You have the various Culture Retarder types with ideological fixations (e.g., Nordicism, ethnonationalism) that put them at odds with pan-Europeanism. They will collaborate with enemies of their people just so they can promote their narrow views. Others simply have personal animus toward particular White ethnies. Some push HBD lies because their career interests and academic reputations are at stake (putting aside why they got interested in this topic to begin with). Others are fixated on IQ with respect to Blacks and as long as they can beat that drum they don't care what falsehoods get promoted. Some people need some simple explanation for the world of racial differences. Whatever the reason, their use of lies and pseudoscience in the service of race treason is inexcusable.

This is American Renaissance:

"TwanC THE WAY

Italians, Greeks, and other southeastern euros carry substantial (recent) near eastern/west asian dna. I see them in the same mold as ashkenazi jews and gypsies. Two groups with substantial euro admixture, but who are also substantially non-euro genetically. I view these groups as being more broadly west eurasian (or in anthropological terms, caucasian). But I don't see them as white. To me white refers to northwest euro descended populations, i.e., germanic groups, the french, and central european/as well as some eastern euro descended populations."

Scum like Lynn who lie about Southern European population genetics are to a large degree responsible for comments like that above.  And sites like Amren and TOO that promote Lynn’s lies are also responsible.

See this.  What one would expect – obsessing over alleged Asian supremacy and superiority over Whites, defending Jews, etc. That’s your “leadership.”

Ad Hoc 2

More on this subject.

In response to my post here, Gab user LeoJacka9794 who often makes very interesting comments to my Gab posts, provides a list of various HBD ad hoc hypothesis hand-waving, as well as other aspects of HBD pseudoscience. His lists are put together here:

- cold winter theory and their eskimo copes (Their newest one is that eskimos were less group selected and nordics are very group selected Dutton's view).

- Catholicism (as being somehow super eugenic compared to orthodoxy) and hajnal theory.

- protestantism is genetic to northern europeans to cope with the fact that nordic achievements happened after large literacy due to Calvinism.

- historical nordic under-achievement is due to northern europe being so damn cold they couldn't have a leisure class (a 100 IQ with 40 hour free time could invent more then a 120 IQ no free time slave laboring). I remember this in Michael Hart's book. This can easily applied to black under-achievement.

- ancient egypt is over-rated, These are the copes I hear when they accept the fact that ancient egypt was not a "nordic desert empire".

- the islamic caliphate, south east asia and southen european empires are over-rated [also sometimes south asia] to fit with cold winter theory.

- Ireland is over-rated, Ireland is a amazon colony: This is their cope with Irish achievement. Lynn's estimate was to fit with their lower gdp per capita then England, but now Ireland is much richer.

- Chinese under-achievement [like in nobel prizes] is due to the maoism or western / jewish trickery, or chinese historical under-achevement is due to the lack of Maoism smashing the bad traditions.

- "Between 600 and 1300 AD , China was clearly more prosperous than the West", some HBDers like Michael Levin have pushed back against this but it hurts the Asia IQ claim.

- biggish african IQ increases in the recent decades, lynn estimates their genotypic IQ to be 80 and their environment holding them back (Lynn used the worst possible Africa samples, I think his estimates were absurdly low).

- Jews are right wing we just don't let them be right wing.

- the super IQ booster of logographic scripts. conveniently ignoring africans

- East asians have more complex speech sounds [therefore smarter], conveniently ignoring africans. And how languages with complex speech sounds are found most in tropical areas.

- polygenic score will prove everything.

- their is no reason to worry about white replacement after all only high culture matters and east Asians supposedly have a very high culture.

- Devlin says that Lynn and Jensen have "disinterest rationality" (I think this was his review of the autobiography of Lynn's book) due to the previous ad hoc. This is to me is a clear ad hoc, their psychology resembles that of the psychiatric disorder Autism.

- over-rating central asia, sycthans, afghanistan, uyghers (derbs defense of hapas) and other supposedly white groups.

- over-rating Japan and south Korea to fit with cold winter theory and high culture replacement. These countries have serious problems particularly south Korea, there is a ton of illegal Korean immigrants to America and not the other way around.

- over-rating north Korea so you can't use a good international relations for south korea sucess, its just their biology that their successful.

- Ignoring "the klineberg fallacy" (immigrants are not always representative of origin) when it comes to asian immigrants but acknowledging it with africans (I think Jensen who coined it, commited this fallacy). Also using selective high schools like Stuyvesant as objective metrics for smartness and not just immigrant preferences (HBDer edrealist is getting push back for acknowledging this about these high schools)

- Japanese and Korean isolation to cope with Asian under-achievement, that argument can easily apply to Africans.

This all is accurate in its description of HBD mendacity. HBD is a POLITICAL movement designed to privilege Jewish and Asian interests over those of Whites.

Delenda est HBD.

Delenda Est Amren

HBD is the enemy.

Look at this absolutely disgusting Amren article. Bow down to your Jewish and Asian masters, you dumb White goyim!

And the the congenitally dishonest Johnson will get together with self-declared Yellow Supremacist Taylor and lie that Amren's obsession with Asian (and Jewish) IQ is "just to show that America is not a White supremacist country."

Sure...that's why Amren has been obsessing over their claims of Jewish and Asian cognitive superiority NON-STOP for more than a generation - for longer than many Alt Right retards have been alive.

Amren = HBD = subservience of Whites to Jewish/Asian interests.

This is American Renaissance:

And now we have East Asians who at IQ 107, or half a standard deviation above whites, dominate American schools in math and engineering and, back home, are rapidly advancing in the sciences. But, see, it’s because they cheat, copy, and steal But not, of course, because they are smarter. Perish forfend.

Yes, perish forfend that we actually consider the overwhelming evidence that Asians do indeed cheat, copy, and steal. But, alas, with a Asiatrix strap-on shoved so far up your ass that the tip is protruding from your mouth, recognizing facts is I suppose very difficult.

Retard Reed makes the Cofnas argument. He fails to explain why if Jews are over-represented in X,Y,Z because they are so smart, then why don't they dominate the Right and do so in an explicitly pro-White manner? Why is the tropism of Jewish intelligence toward destruction? Why? Why have complaints about the Jews over time concentrated on ethnocentrism, dual morality hypocrisy, misanthropy, and nation-wrecking? Why are the few Jews involved in the Far Right, directly or indirectly, almost always destructive? Remember Hart's multiracial "White separatist state" (sic)? I for one will never forget it.

A question answered:

European Immigrant

Why the Asians are being systematically raised to the level of God creators is beyond me. They are highly skilled copycats. The Chinese pioneered in the invention of gunpowder and even that may be a stretch to their credit.

Why? HBD is promoted by:

• 1. Jews and Asians
• 2. White "men" married to the above and/or White "men" with masochistic sexual fantasies about dominant Asian females ("measured groveling").
• 3. Nordicists who promote HBD because the HBDers exploit Nord vanity and anti-Med animus by talking about how dumb Meds are and the superiority of Nords over Meds - the price for that is accepting Jewish and Asian supremacy and masterhood
• 4. Academics pushing theories about IQ-GDP

See this.

HBDers were at the forefront in denying China's culpability, also spreading Chinese propaganda about an "American bioweapon."

The only question now is whether HBD has been acting as unregistered agents of the Chinese government - if so, perp walks and Supermax time is appropriate - or whether this was a self-motivated groveling to China, perhaps generated by sweaty masochistic fantasies about Chinatrics - if so, HBD should be met with mocking ridicule.

Either way, HBD is, once again, completely discredited.

Delenda est HBD.  Delenda est Amren.

Odds and Ends, 6/26/21

In der news.

Non-stop “movement” ejaculations commence.

However, flaccidity commences:

From 1962 to 1966, she lived in Ghana. The then Ghanaian President, Kwame Nkrumah invited Reitsch to Ghana after reading of her work in India. At Afienya she founded the first black African national gliding school, working closely with the government and the armed forces…Reitsch's attitudes to race underwent a change. "Earlier in my life, it would never have occurred to me to treat a black person as a friend or partner ..." She now experienced guilt at her earlier "presumptuousness and arrogance.” She became close to Nkrumah. The details of their relationship are now unclear due to the destruction of documents, but some surviving letters are intimate in tone.

Behold Negritude.

Is Taylor really this naïve?

No thanks, Dr. Murray. I’m glad you wrote some interesting things about race and IQ and crime. But I am appalled to learn that you agree with the people whose ideas you oppose: In America, the real problem is white people.

Murray is a HBDer.  HBD is an ideology opposed to White interests. I have been saying this for years. Is it possible that HBDer Taylor doesn’t understand this? Or do the HBDers have a vested interest to hide the truth about their anti-White cult?

See this.  There's so much opportunity for real world activism, and infiltration of mainstream discourse. But, alas, the inept Quota Queens wrecked everything with their Alt Right, Unite the Right, and today, instead of being positioned to join with "normies" we get retarded commentaries about "Savitri Devi."

A real hero.  One would love to see films of that anti-HBD activity.

More stupidity.

Promoting HBD - surprise!

Thanks for the free advertising, Charles.

Once again, I have seen zero empirical evidence in favor of racialist “entryism” – that people will end up in WN if they start off with milder HBD and/or civic nationalism.  No doubt that works for some people, there will be anecdotes from people outlining their “entryist” pathway. But others can share anecdotes outlining other pathways. For myself, I first got involved in hardcore Nutzism, and then found out about Taylor, MacDonald, HBD, and all the rest through Nutzis – a sort of reverse entryism, but not really reversed, since I didn’t actually move backwards ideologically, just that I expanded my base of interactions, expanding out from a more extreme position to less extreme positions, but still maintaining my main extreme focal point.  My point here is that not everyone moves along the less extreme to more extreme pathway. There may be people for whom the less extreme positions are a dead end, a cul-de-sac, and they never move farther.

HBD, including Murray’s previous work, has been around for years, for decades.  Do we need more HBD material? With everything going on in current events, do we need yet another IQ-crime analysis?  And what about the entryism of HBD to Jew- and Asian-worship, and aracial cognitive elitism?  What is the cost-benefit ratio of the HBD cult?  Is it worth telling people for the 1000th time that Blacks are stupid and violent, if they come away like John Engelman, groveling to Jews and Asians?

Let’s get some empirical data – quantitative data – before assuming that we need to promote HBD pseudoscientific nonsense in order to recruit for WN.

Hey!  I’m real confused and all. I thought covid-19 was only “the flu” or “a cold?”

There would be a reason to take all of these steps to save The God Emperor from just a nasty little head cold?

See this. Of greater interest to me is the typical right-wing comments. If it’s not Jaysus or conspiracy theories, then it’s not true, guddummint! Dat Right!

Odds and Ends, 6/2/21

In der news.

As I have a small bit of IRL free time the past few days, another post is now presented, to take advantage of this window of opportunity.

Happy belated post-communist Children’s Day.

Homosexual past?  Pink swastika indeed! The quality of the presentation is horrible. “1924 putsch?”  Off by a year.  “1932 election of Hitler?” Huh?  What alternative timeline was that?  Hitler came to power in 1933 and was appointed by Hindenburg. “Gutternsipe?” Pure propaganda.

Solid evidence that Hitler had a homosexual past = zero.

Solid evidence that the Nazis started the Reichstag fire = zero.

I'm no Hitler fanboy, but that video was pitiful.

Self-indulgent nonsense.

The grift continues?

Just the facts.  HBDers weep. Pangolins?  I thought it was “an American bioweapon.”  Now, it’s back to being zoonotic?  Should HBDers be indicted for treason?  Convicted?  Executed?

This analysis is surprisingly reasonable. The single most important point in that essay:

When viewed as a system, what appears to be coordination and sentience in liberal democracy is actually emergent behavior.

This is an error the Far Right makes as often, or more so, than the Right in general. Everything to them is a well-coordinated conspiracy, orchestrated by “the Jews” or “the globalists” (who of course overlap to a considerable degree). In actuality, much of the behavior in question is emergent from the properties of the System, which is, of course, created and maintained, also to a considerable degree, by those selfsame Jews/globalists.  So, in many cases, it is indirect, rather than direct, control.  True enough, the endpoint is the same, but to correctly diagnose the problem, and to avoid sounding like lunatics to “normies,” indirect vs. direct is an important distinction. It is a distinction with a difference, at least with respect to political optics and eventual victory.

One wonders if the same applies to Der Movement.  Perhaps some of that which I ascribe to a coordinated HBD-Nordicist-ethnonationalist alliance is, at least in part, simply due to emergent behavior of a racialist system created by, and for, Nordicists and related types of ethnic fetishists.

Still, though, the coordination among elements in Der Movement at times seems more coordinated than what is observed in the System. Is the "movement" behavior really coordinated? Reality or illusion?  Hard to say.  The recent emergence of Lipton Matthews among a variety of Quota Queen outlets, virtually simultaneously, is an example of either fairly tight coordination or an emergent strain of groupthink that is quite remarkable in its own right. Can it be possible that “movement” dogma and rent-seeking self-interest is so pronounced that the Quota Queens move in the same direction independently and without overt directing coordination?

Getting back to the Zman article, and looking at society as a whole, a fundamental problem is that human types that exhibit “dark triad” psychopathic traits tend to rise to positions of authority (we’ll pass in silence over the relevance of that to Der Movement), and such elites structure society to serve their own selfish interests. On a group level, ethnocentric and collectivist psychopaths (Jews) structure society to benefit their own group, and they leverage more individualistic psychopaths (High Trusters) so as to get the latter to work against their own racial interests (that they care nothing for) and instead support the racial interests of the former group.  Hence, we observe as a result a “right-wing” leadership that acts against White interests not much different, in the end, than do leftists.  The entire System is built to serve the interests of psychopaths, and among these, the group interests of the more collectivist are favored. The emergent properties of such a System become rapidly evident to careful observers.

Well, yes.  Re: Jews and others who support Jewish interests:

They’ll be writing and publishing anti-Black materials themselves, in an effort to capture that particular market and control it.

Yes, it’s called HBD.

And the Jews will figure that if they can keep the reaction under control for twenty years or so, for a generation, it will lose its vitality and die out. And then there’ll be nothing left to threaten them, nothing left to thwart their plan for a Mulatto future.

Der Movement is, perhaps unknowingly, part of that controlling delaying action. The words quoted were from Pierce, thirty seven years ago. Thirty seven years! And what has been accomplished in all of that time? Nothing.

Speaking of which, you can only laugh at this gibbering stupidity. Gee, well, if we can’t tell that folks are Jews due to their skin tones and hair textures, and if Jews can pass as “Nordish,” we’ll just have to parse their behavior. I mean, that’s all objective and scientific, right?  Break out the behavioral calipers, so to speak.

Are those thirty seven years of utter failure becoming more understandable?

Sallis Right Again: Political Population Genetics

And other news.

Another example of the politicization of science:

Isolation-by-distance models are part of the institutional creed of antiracialism used to critique claims of biological race concepts (BRCs). Proponents of antiracialism appeal to isolation-by-distance models to describe patterns of human genetic differences among and between groups as a function of distance. Isolation by distance has been referred to as the pattern that human genetic variation fits, distributing the differences we see as race throughout geographic space as a series of Gaussian gradients. Contemporary scientific critiques of BRCs fuse social constructionist race concepts with a description of the distribution of proportions of human genetic variation in geographic space as a function of distance. These two points are often followed by statements noting that there is only one human race... To address the shortcomings in the scientific critique of race, the author proposes combining Du Boisian demography with Darwinian evolutionary biology. From a Du Boisian demographic perspective, race is a product of racism, or race/ism, and is a heredity and inheritance system based on rules of partus sequitur ventrem and hypodescent. Race marks individuals and groups them to reproduce unequal relationships into which Europeans co-opted them. This synthesis propounds a new racial formation theory to understand the more general consequences of racism on genes and health outcomes.

This is an admission that much of modern population genetics, and pseudoscientific denials of racial reality, is based on “the institutional creed of antiracialism,” and not on genuine scientific empiricism.

...the differences we see as race throughout geographic space as a series of Gaussian gradients. Contemporary scientific critiques of BRCs fuse social constructionist race concepts with a description of the distribution of proportions of human genetic variation in geographic space as a function of distance.

Ignoring clustering and ignoring the ability of definitively assign race based on genetic data or on forensic anthropology.

To address the shortcomings in the scientific critique of race, the author proposes combining Du Boisian demography with Darwinian evolutionary biology.

"Du Boisian demography?" Do you need any more evidence that the “scientific” establishment has been completely co-opted by SJW lunacy and by Colored radicalism?

Everything I’ve ever written about the political objectives of population genetics is verified. And, by the way, do you think that “testing companies,” with their known biases and leaked admission of “owning racists” by fudging results, are immune to this politicization?

The pseudoscience of the Left mirrors that of the Right (e.g., HBD) - they start out with the desired conclusion and then work backward to try and justify it.

Should there be treason trials for selected HBDers?  Is there any way of connecting their activity to aiding China levying war against the United States?

The HBDers need to “pay” as well.

Considering all of the prominent HBDers, isn't it interesting that there is a correlation between promoting HBD and having one or more of the following characteristics:

1. Being critical and/or opposed to White nationalism

2. Consumed with hostility toward pan-Europeanism

3. Being of non-European ancestry and/or married to someone of non-European ancestry

4. Promoting one or more of the following: miscegenation, aracial citizenism, cognitive elitist IQ nationalism, pseudoscience

5. Open disdain for White ethnics, typically combined with worship of Jews and East Asians

6. Innate hostility for any memes that unite Europeans and innate tropism toward any memes that divide Europeans

7. Being "socially awkward" or some other type of mattoid, including defending child porn

Related material.

Read this, and remember that the Quota Queens deny that the affirmative action program exists.

I’m surprised that we have not yet heard from Der Movement that all of the UFOs in the news are actually Nazi flying saucers from Antarctica. 

What hypocrisy.  In Hungary, no less.  Remember this:

Author Marisa Abrajano, whose origins we can only imagine from her name and appearance, teaches political science at UC San Diego. Zoltan Hajnal also teaches at UC San Diego. Zoltan is a Hungarian name, so it’s unlikely his ancestors came over on the Mayflower. White Backlash is published by Princeton University Press.

This is the perfect symbol for our degenerate times. Foreigners tell the American founding stock how benighted and deserving of oblivion we are, and are published by one of the country’s most prestigious academic presses. We have work to do.

Maybe Hungarians should not have foreigners in their nation preaching to them about “European Brotherhood” while in reality opposing that “brotherhood” in their own nations.

A telling admission from the new Counter-Currents:

Nick JeelvyMay 31, 2021 at 2:30 pm

I must admit I had no idea what the point of this article was while I was writing it…

And that’s an article behind their paywall!  You just can’t make this stuff up.

Verified Hate: American Renaissance Edition

Let’s take a look. Bold font emphasis added.

Let’s copy “Hood’s” “verified hate” trope and consider American Renaissance (Amren).  Some folks on Gab have questioned my critiques about Amren; what am I talking about?  Well, let’s quote, or link to, Amren writers and/or commentators, and see what we can discern.

John Engelman is not only a long time Amren commentator, but has also written for them.  Here’s a sample of his work:

Jews will replace you.

Wherever you look, Asians outperform whites academically and financially...

we have a considerably less than one standard deviation difference between Asian IQ — North Asian IQ — and white IQ. I think that, too, is a result of genetics, and I think that that is what explains the dominance of Asians in certain fields, and their lower rates of illegitimacy compared to whites, their lower crime rates, their better achievement in school, their higher average incomes..

I am a race realist who recognizes a racial hierarchy with Ashkenazi Jews at the top, followed by Orientals. I am open in expressing my admiration for the Ashkenazim and Orientals.

Whites are not faced with genocide. They are faced with an economy that increasingly requires one to have a reasonably high IQ in order to make a decent income.

Implying that stupid Whites can't compete with Jews and Asians. Back to Engelman praising all sorts of non-Whites:

One of the best friends I ever had in my life was a black college professor. Unfortunately, I never had the opportunity to introduce him to my sisters. If I had, and if he was indifferent to them, I would have said nothing, while thinking, "Why aren't you attracted to my sisters? They are beautiful.

…I like immigrants. I have been in love with a few…I have always liked Orientals.

The Jews are not subversives. They are creators and achievers. So are Chinese.

The Jews will stay, thank goodness. We need their IQ power. We need Chinese immigrants for the same reason. If you visit the science and mathematics department of any elite university you will find it crowded with Chinese. They did not get there by affirmative action. They got there by talent and hard work.

My two best friends in high school were Chinese Americans. I have dated Chinese women.

I have never known a Chinese person I did not like.

Well, then – seems like sort of a pattern developing there.

Jared Taylor, who says that “Jews look White to me” and who has described Amren as “yellow supremacist,” adds:

I think Asians are objectively superior to Whites by just about any measure that you can come up with in terms of what are the ingredients for a successful society.

But, alas, Taylor has a quite different view of Hungarian-Americans:

Author Marisa Abrajano, whose origins we can only imagine from her name and appearance, teaches political science at UC San Diego. Zoltan Hajnal also teaches at UC San Diego. Zoltan is a Hungarian name, so it’s unlikely his ancestors came over on the Mayflower. White Backlash is published by Princeton University Press.

This is the perfect symbol for our degenerate times. Foreigners tell the American founding stock how benighted and deserving of oblivion we are, and are published by one of the country’s most prestigious academic presses. We have work to do.

Foreigners like Zoltan. Not like “Rosie” of course, oh no. Hainan at America, indeed.

How about commentators?  See the following:

Michael North 

I didn't know Ariana Grande was Sicilian - now I loathe her even more.

Xanthippe2  Michael North 

Ditto. And I bet my loathing would increase even more if I was ever to hear one of her songs.

Well, we all can’t be Jews or Chinamen.

Anglo-Saxons seem to be somewhat acceptable as well:

John Smith  

Anybody who isn't an Anglo-Saxon of Northern European descent with light skin is a person of color. George Clooney is fully Northern European but he sure as hell isn't very "White"? Is he? I've seen Sicillians [sic] and Jews who are whiter then Clooney.

The French and other Southern European nations were all ruled by the Roman Empire which was mixed race. Including big parts of Southern Germany.

White people are Norweigans [sic], Danes, Swedes, Dutch, Northern Germans, English, Irish and Scottish who have LIGHT skin. Anybody not listed is "a person of color". Even those Eastern Europeans who have a lot of Central Asian admixture.

The HBD Jeurasian alliance – (light-complexioned) Nords plus Jews plus (North) East Asians: Good! Southern and Eastern Europeans: Bad!

Sam Oranger 

Ariana Grande can pass for “color” as Sicilians are part Arab and part North African…This is just a fact and everyone knows it.

That’s a fact, jack!

“Gregory Hood” – an Amren writer who initiated some of the verified hate quoted above:

Also, are we to believe there’s something wrong with Armenians or Sicilians getting away with being considered non-white? I would say they are white, but it’s less clear cut than for Northern Europeans. For all we know, Kim Kardashian and Ariana Grande never considered themselves white. So what’s the problem? Would it be better if Ariana Grande were North African?

Never forget this.  Jews and Asians are on the other hand, are high IQ demigods. My response to all of that.

Attacking Romanians. Well, they're not Jews or Asians. My response.

Italians: Bad. Hungarians: Bad. Romanians: Bad. Jews and Asians: Good.

Derbyshire, married to a Chinese woman with mixed-race children, a defender of miscegenation, who has called “race purists” “nuts,” has been an honored guest speaker at Amren conferences. Derbyshire wrote:

A friend of mine, a brilliant, charming, and highly civilized man I shall call X, runs a fringe political group here in the U.S. He invited me to one of the group's annual conferences. Not sure what to expect, I asked a mutual friend, name of Y, who had attended a previous year's conference. "Well," said Y, "there are a dozen or so people like X, thoughtful and well-informed — people you'd be happy to hang out with. And around them buzzes this big cloud of latrine flies." I decided not to take up X's invitation.

Ah, yes. While we don’t know who “Y” is, “X” is undoubtedly Taylor and the “conference” is undoubtedly Amren. Correct me if I am wrong, Mr. Derbyshire.

Well, hey, those “latrine flies” are not Jews or Chinamen, so the insult serves them right!

Are all of you rank-and-file folks learning anything yet?

Also remember: “HBD race realism” is nothing more or less than a political movement aimed at privileging Jewish and Asian interests over those of Whites.

It’s the 1918 Flu, Bro!

Lies about the 1918 Flu. Emphasis added.

I have long been exposing the pro-Chinese shilling in Der Movement, particularly the HBD race realist and Silk Road factions, the tendency to absolve the Chinese of any blame for anything, and the pathetic “Jew-baiting” technique to attack critics of the Chinese.

Let’s take the possible Chinese role in the 1918 “Spanish” flu. The lickspittle pro-Chinese shills over at Unz doing their thing:

There is one other aspect to this that requires mention: the attempt by some individuals to lay the blame for this event on China. The accusation itself is too stupid to warrant refuting…

Sure, I mean why actually argue against evidence?  The continued generation of disease in China, endlessly confirmed by historical and epidemiological studies, is too stupid to warrant refuting.  Is that Chinatrix strap-on a snug fit?  Just joking of course…

There is so much effort today to attribute the ‘Spanish flu’ to the Chinese – by Jewish historians – as there also is to attribute Europe’s Bubonic Plague to the Chinese – by the same Jewish historians. This really needs to end, and the best method is to name and identify all those responsible. Perhaps the time has finally arrived for the world to know the truth of a great many things.

Jewish historians!  Jews, Jews, everywhere! The pro-Chinese faction always tries to appeal to the knee-jerk anti-Semitism of the Far Right by attributing every criticism of the Chinese to Jews (never mind the traditionally warm feelings between Jews and Chinese, good Israeli-Chinese relations, and talk of a “pivot” of international Jewry towards Asia and pro-Asian attitudes).

Laughably, the filthy Chinese still have bubonic plague today, but to talk about that, or identify that the disease originated in China, means that you are a Jew. Jew historians!  Note the Chinese names among the scientists involved in tracking down the origin of the bubonic plague to China. I suppose that they are all...Chinese Jews! Jews, Jews everywhere....eating their gelfite fish with chopsticks, along with their kosher eggrolls!

Can you believe the transparent obviousness of the Unzians? Every time someone says something they don't like, they cry "Jew!"  Of course, if they'd point at Unz himself and cry "Jew!," then in that instance they'd be accurate.

The labeling of all critics of China as "Jews" is absurd ad hominem. So, EGI Notes exposes the Chinese role in infecting humanity throughout the centuries, thus, I’m a Jew (or “suck Jewish cock” according to Daniel S. of Majority Rights). Madness.

Let’s return the favor:

He has been a visiting professor at Shanghai’s Fudan University, presenting case studies in international affairs to senior EMBA classes. Mr. Romanoff lives in Shanghai…

So, Canadian historian Humphries is a "Jew," and Sallis (long labeled a “virulent anti-Semite” and someone who met Pierce to talk about ideas and strategy) is a "Jew," but “Romanoff” is definitely not a Jew. The fact that this turd “lives in Shanghai” also has absolutely nothing to do with the nonsense he’s peddling – it’s a coincidence, a coincidence I say!  He’s stationed in China and spreading nonsense that covid-19 initiated in America, and now the 1918 flu was another American conspiracy, but, hey, he could be living anywhere. 

So, according to this Unzian retard, who just happens to be living in China, what was the 1918 flu?

...In fact, it is now stated that the reason modern medical technology was never able to identify the “killer influenza strain” from this pandemic was because influenza was not the killer. It might be obvious to us today because we know that influenza attacks the young, old and immunocompromised, while the “Spanish Flu” attacked healthy people in their prime – which is what a bacterial pneumonia does.

Again, the official narrative tells us that, due to troop movements because of the war, the pathogen was spread worldwide. But the current emerging thesis is that troop movements might have been irrelevant because Rockefeller, in their combined haste and hubris, “sent their experimental anti-meningococcal serum to England, France, Belgium, Italy and many other countries, helping spread the epidemic worldwide...

Those damn Jew doctors jabbing people with their toxic serum!  Sodomizing folks with their anti-meningococcal needles!

As regards modern medical technology was never able to identify the “killer influenza strain” from this pandemic – it takes maybe less than 15 seconds of googling to find such items as:

See this.

In the article, Taubenberger and his team described their initial work to sequence part of the genome of the 1918 virus. The genome is the complete list of genetic instructions that make up an organism, similar to a blueprint used for construction. Many people are familiar with the concept of DNA, which is dual-stranded and determines the fundamental genetic characteristics of nearly all living things. However, the genome of an influenza virus consists of single-stranded RNA instead. Taubenberger’s team team successfully extracted RNA of the 1918 virus from lung tissue obtained from a 21-year-old male U.S. service member stationed in Fort Jackson, South Carolina. The serviceman had been admitted to the camp’s hospital on September 20, 1918, with a diagnosis of influenza infection and pneumonia. He died six days later on September 26, 1918, and a sample of his lung tissue was collected and preserved for later study.

More on this.

The “Spanish” influenza pandemic of 1918–19 caused acute illness in 25–30 percent of the world’s population and resulted in the death of up to an estimated 40 million people. Using fixed and frozen lung tissue of 1918 influenza victims, the complete genomic sequence of the 1918 influenza virus has been deduced. Sequence and phylogenetic analysis of the completed 1918 influenza virus genes shows them to be the most avian-like among the mammalian-adapted viruses. This finding supports the hypotheses that (1) the pandemic virus contains genes derived from avian-like influenza virus strains and that (2) the 1918 virus is the common ancestor of human and classical swine H1N1 influenza viruses. The relationship of the 1918 virus with avian influenza viruses is further supported by recent work in which the 1918 hemagglutinin (HA) protein crystal structure was resolved. Neither the 1918 hemagglutinin (HA) nor the neuraminidase (NA) genes possess mutations known to increase tissue tropicity that account for the virulence of other influenza virus strains like A/WSN/33 or the highly pathogenic avian influenza H5 or H7 viruses. Using reverse genetics approaches, influenza virus constructs containing the 1918 HA and NA on a modern human influenza virus background were lethal in mice. The complete 1918 virus was even more virulent in mice. The genotypic basis of this virulence has not yet been elucidated. The complete sequence of the non-structural (NS) gene segment of the 1918 virus was deduced and also tested for the hypothesis that enhanced virulence in 1918 could have been due to type I interferon inhibition by the NS1 protein. Results from these experiments suggest that in human cells the 1918 NS1 is a very effective interferon antagonist, but the 1918 NS1 gene does not have the amino acid change that correlates with virulence in the H5N1 virus strains identified in 1997 in Hong Kong. Sequence analysis of the 1918 pandemic influenza virus is allowing us to test hypotheses as to the origin and virulence of this strain. This information should help elucidate how pandemic influenza virus strains emerge and what genetic features contribute to virulence in humans.

And this.

The influenza A virus pandemic of 1918–1919 resulted in an estimated 20–40 million deaths worldwide. The hemagglutinin and neuraminidase sequences of the 1918 virus were previously determined. We here report the sequence of the A/Brevig Mission/1/18 (H1N1) virus nonstructural (NS) segment encoding two proteins, NS1 and nuclear export protein. Phylogenetically, these genes appear to be close to the common ancestor of subsequent human and classical swine strain NS genes. Recently, the influenza A virus NS1 protein was shown to be a type I IFN antagonist that plays an important role in viral pathogenesis. By using the recently developed technique of generating influenza A viruses entirely from cloned cDNAs, the hypothesis that the 1918 virus NS1 gene played a role in virulence was tested in a mouse model. In a BSL3+ laboratory, viruses were generated that possessed either the 1918 NS1 gene alone or the entire 1918 NS segment in a background of influenza A/WSN/33 (H1N1), a mouse-adapted virus derived from a human influenza strain first isolated in 1933. These 1918 NS viruses replicated well in tissue culture but were attenuated in mice as compared with the isogenic control viruses. This attenuation in mice may be related to the human origin of the 1918 NS1 gene. These results suggest that interaction of the NS1 protein with host-cell factors plays a significant role in viral pathogenesis.

Scientists reconstructing the 1918 virus.

There’s more of course, much more, but I’ll leave that as an exercise to the reader to find. Do you still believe that modern medical technology was never able to identify the “killer influenza strain” from this pandemic?

But all of those studies and all of that data are obviously – obviously, I say! – part of the Rockefeller-America-Jew conspiracy! Jew scientists! The DNA sequencing machines are Jewish!  Every vial of chain-terminating ddNTPs has a little yarmulke cap on it!  Jews, Jews, everywhere!

Oh well. We don’t want to offend Ms. Wei Fuk Yu now, do we?  Anyone who doesn’t bend over and spread their ass cheeks to the Chinese is, of course, a “Jew” or a “Jew historian” or is busy “sucking Jewish cock.”

Ask yourself why the pro-Chinese shills of HBD and of Silk Road White nationalism are ever-so-eager to lie to you. Ask yourself whether every virologist and epidemiologist who recognize that the 1918 pandemic was a flu, regardless of where they think it originated, is lying to you or whether this is just more anti-scientific crap spewing forth from the stinking orifice of the Unz site.

Questions to ask indeed!

There is some controversy as to where the 1918 Flu Pandemic started. Some say the USA. Others like Humphries say China. I agree with the latter, given China’s long history as a festering petri dish of disease, where the overcrowded and filthy conditions are prime breeding grounds for every type of microbe imaginable, following by the inevitable cross-species jump from Chinese to humans. 

But, regardless of where it originated, no serious academic, no virologist, no epidemiologist, no scientist, no one, is arguing against the long-standing and voluminous evidence that we are dealing here with a natural influenza.  

Crazed conspiracy theories delegitimize the Right and make sane and rational people question anything and everything the Right says, even that bulk of which that is true. Is this a reason for spreading ludicrous conspiracy theories to begin with? Further, STEM people, unfortunately already enriched on the Left, will be driven further from the Right the more that the Right engages in pseudoscientific fantasies to push conspiracy theories. Those are all good reasons for me to speak out, again and again, against Der Right's paranoid ideation, particularly when it directly or indirectly involves science.

I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again – the real conspiracies are, for the most part, those open, right in your face. Want to consider a potential conspiracy? Why are there so many, ostensibly on the Right, who are slavish pro-Chinese shills, and who parrot Chinese government propaganda, and who sugar-coat this nonsense to the Right with superficial anti-Semitism, labeling every critic of the Chinese, and/or every critic of their theories, as a “Jew” or a “sycophant of Jews” (that Unz himself is a Jew, and that so many of these stories are being promoted by Unz, escapes many of these people and their readers, who are not very big on self-awareness or on recognition of reality)?

Some vulgar but in my opinion accurate statements:

Ron Unz is a piece of shit.

Anyone who writes for Unz is a piece of shit.

Anyone who agrees to have their outside work reproduced on the Unz site is a piece of shit.

Anyone who accepts money from Unz is a piece of shit.

Happy Easter, 2021

In all cases, emphasis added.

Happy Easter!

This is HBD; this is race realism – 

JohnEngelman  

Wherever you look, Asians outperform whites academically and financially...

we have a considerably less than one standard deviation difference between Asian IQ — North Asian IQ — and white IQ. I think that, too, is a result of genetics, and I think that that is what explains the dominance of Asians in certain fields, and their lower rates of illegitimacy compared to whites, their lower crime rates, their better achievement in school, their higher average incomes...

I think Asians are objectively superior to whites by just about any measure that you can come up with in terms of what are the ingredients for a successful society.

- Jared Taylor, Interview

One HBD yellow supremacist quotes another HBD (self-declared) yellow supremacist. Race realism in action!  Haven’t all you rank-and-file activists out there yet realized that everything that I write about the HBDers is absolutely true?

Is this – “I think Asians are objectively superior to whites by just about any measure that you can come up with in terms of what are the ingredients for a successful society” – what you want in your “leadership?” Consider Murray's book of human accomplishment and the vast over-representation of Europeans and the vast under-representation of Asians, and consider the absurd quote "Asians are objectively superior to whites."  Question - if Asians are ever-so-superior, why do they immigrate to White nations, rather then reverse?

HBD is nothing more or less than a political movement to privilege the interests of Jews and Asians over those of Whites.

HBD race realism among Whites is nothing more or less than race treason.

Considering the moronic "agrarian populism" essay by Jeelvy, I am reminded of my observation concerning the lack of mutual understanding between White Americans and White Europeans. Europeans like to state that (White) Americans do not understand Europe and Europeans, but I have observed that it is even more true that Europeans do not understand America and (White) Americans. To Europeans, America is always perpetually in the year 1920 or 1910. To them, White America is composed of completely disjunctive, unmixed ethnic groups that are at odds with each other or, at best, completely indifferent to each other. They believe that all White ethnics live in urban enclaves, separate from other Whites, and behave exactly as did their ancestors right "off the boat." They believe that founding stock White American men are all akin to the characters played by Gary Cooper or JImmy Stewart in their movies. They believe that the American heartland is full of White farmers on their little family homestead farms and they believe that the American military is primarily composed of rural Scots-Irish Andrew Jackson types. To them, it's "Gangs of New York" on a regular basis in the cities and "the Rifleman" on a regular basis in rural America. And hanging out online with American Nutzis does nothing to dispel these fantasies.

The coming American break-up.

An Interesting Comment, 3/17/21

Food for thought from Occidental Dissent. Emphasis added.

ATBOTL

MARCH 17, 2021 AT 1:19 AM

The alt-right needs to do more to oppose Asian immigration. We have a sickness in our movement of Asianphilia. It comes from Jared Taylor dishonestly and cowardly using Asian supremacist language to try to deflect from charges of white supremacism back in the 90’s. Then about ten years ago, the alt-right was flooded with low testosterone nerds with a sexual fixation on Asian women.

This virus was caused by the filthy and corrupt culture of the Chinese. They abuse animals and handle food in a filthy way. However, retarded morons in our movement created false conspiracy theories about the virus that take the focus off the flaws in Chinese culture and essentially absolve the Chinese of culpability.

It appears that elements of the alt-right are moving away from white nationalism towards some kind of ridiculous and useless multi-racial populism. Those of us in the alt-right who are sincere white nationalists need to do more to fight Asianphilia and Hispanicphilia.

Well, is there anything in that comment that is wrong? No. It reads as perfectly sensible to me. A truly wonderful and thoughtful comment.

 By the way, to assuage the paranoia of the anti-Sallis fanatics out there, I can assure you that "ATBOTL" is NOT Ted Sallis.  However, all of the important points are covered:

1. Asiaphilia in Der Movement has reached a point of being a real "sickness."  The HBD fraud - HBD being nothing more or less than a political movement to privilege Asian and Jewish interests over those of Whites - has thoroughly infiltrated "movement" "activism," in no small part due to the "yellow supremacist" "race realists."

2. Taylor has a great deal of responsibility for this. Over and over again, we had to hear "we're not white supremacists, if anything we're yellow supremacists," with the same tired ritualized dogma of k-selected big-brained Asians and their high, high, high IQ. Taylor gave forums to Asian-loving "race realists" like the execrable Derbyshire and the bizarre Engelman.

3. Then, yes, we had "a rite of passage in the Alt Right is dating Asian women," never mind all of Derbyshire's promotion of miscegenation, and the tolerance of  people like "Pilleater" (a tolerance that backfired on Johnson bigtime). "Sexual fixation on Asian women" - absolutely correct. However, to be more precise, it should be "an ultra-masochistic sexual fixation on Asian women."  From self-described "measured groveling" to bizarre ideation of black-booted Chinese girls with guns being the "border guards of the West," the problem goes beyond a mere "sexual fixation." HBD and Silk Road White nationalism, in my opinion, have their origins in some really sick sexual deviancies.

4. Elements of Der Right, spearheaded by the Jew Unz site, and also joined by Alt Lite retards like Ramsey, deflect blame away from China, either promoting transparently stupid anti-White conspiracy theories or fixating on peripheral issues like "masks."

5. White nationalism is, or should be, about White folks. We're not here to worship and defend the Asians who hate us and who, even in the best circumstances, are not us and can never be us.