Fisking Todd Blodgett

Riposte to a buffoon (aka – answering a former Quota Queen). In all cases, emphasis added.

Laugh at this.

Let’s look at some background about Blodgett before getting to the letter.

Todd Blodgett…

With a surname like “Blodgett” you just know he got an instant free pass in Der Movement. And as you’ll soon see, you’d be correct.

…worked as an FBI informant…

Rat.

….inside the white supremacist movement.

There is no such thing.  There are very few “white supremacists” in America.  There are many pro-White activists, including White nationalists, which is a completely different type of specimen.

His political career began in the Reagan administration as a junior staffer. He helped the 1988 Bush-Quayle presidential campaign. But in the 1990s, Blodgett drifted into circles that included infamous American Nazis like Willis Carto, and “The Turner Diaries” author William Pierce.

Yeah…he “drifted.” Translation: As a NW European “WASP” type, he was immediately scooped up and elevated to high levels in Der Movement sans any real merit.

While Blodgett said he was never a “true believer,” …

There you go.  He was “never a true believer” but he was working with the biggest names in the American Far Right, including Carto and Pierce.  But, you see, you don’t need to be a “true believer” – just have the “correct” ethnic ancestry and surname.

…he helped Carto increase circulation and funding of his tabloid magazine, The Spotlight, and was a co-owner of Resistance Records, the largest white supremacist music label in the U.S. He spent time with other notable white supremacists, including Jared Taylor and David Duke.

Taylor and Duke.  Calling the Southrons!  How could they resist someone named Blodgett?  Of course, had he been named “Finkelstein” or “Chen” he may have still appealed to one of those gentlemen.

In the early-2000s, Blodgett become an FBI informant…

We’ll get an idea why shortly.

…and used his access to the highest levels of the American white supremacist community, including the KKK, neo-Nazis and the Aryan Nations. Since then, Blodgett has spoken out against white supremacy and has worked with groups like Life After Hate that rehabilitate white supremacists.

OK, a typical apostate.  But, we need more information.  

First, see this.

From March 2000 to November 2002, Blodgett was retained by the Federal Bureau of Investigation to supply information concerning organizations and individuals affiliated with the racist Far right. He regularly met with and reported to FBI and JTTF (the Joint Terrorism Task Force) agents and other officials, after attending gatherings hosted by Holocaust Deniers and White Supremacist groups, which featured racist, far-right extremists who were of interest to American anti-terrorism law enforcement officials and agencies.

More importantly, see this.

In the next four years, he would meet and work with other extremists including the notorious..

Emotional ad hominem.

…William Pierce, leader of the neo-Nazi National Alliance. After his role as a broker for Pierce was revealed in the Intelligence Report, Blodgett says his world began to collapse. In short order, he approached the magazine hoping, he said, to redeem himself publicly.

OK.  Motivation part one.  His work for Pierce was exposed, causing difficulties.  Therefore – “he approached the magazine hoping, he said, to redeem himself publicly.” Note there’s nothing there about the ideology of White nationalism being flawed, or the facts upon which that ideology is based being wrong.  Instead, he suffered personally because of System/Left social pricing, and therefore he wanted the personal damage to be alleviated.  

But…there’s more.  Now we’ll move on to motivation part two.

Blodgett: Truthfully, the answer is I was very opportunistically inclined. It was business — strictly business — and now I'm paying the price for it, and I'm not happy about it. I was stiffed by Willis Carto to the tune of about $78,000, and I'm angry.

OK. He was angry about money – allegedly he was “stiffed by Willis Carto to the tune of about $78,000.” Note once again – nothing about ideology, facts, or anything else, re: the cause being wrong.  Again, this was a personal issue. Now, a bit more about motivation number one:

My wife and my parents are not happy about the Washington Post [which ran an article recapitulating the earlier Intelligence Report story], and I want to get past that.

The personal social pricing pressure was increasing since his family was “not happy” about the whole situation, so he wanted “to get past that.”  Once again – a purely personal issue. Where’s the epiphany about the errors of White nationalism?  I’m sure any faux “epiphany” was retroactively applied later to rationalize a personal response to personal issues.

Now, let’s take a step back and discern how he got involved in Der Movement to begin with.

Blodgett: Republicans lost a lot of seats in 1990 and were kind of on the defensive and I just decided I was tired of politics. So I employed my skills as a salesman and advertising writer with a California entrepreneur who was and is the owner of Slick Times, a kind of Clinton lampoon. In January 1995, I decided to start my own consulting company.

In the meantime, Willis Carto had been contacting me to come work for him. I named a price I thought he'd never meet — $3,500 a month — and sure enough, he agreed. He also gave me an assistant.

I mean, do you need any more evidence of the "movement's" ethnic affirmative action policy? He went from “a salesman and advertising writer” and being involved with his “own consulting company" to being recruited to work for one of the leading lights of the American Far Right – and at $3,500 per month (1990s money – adjust for inflation)!  And with an assistant! That’s akin to Johnson hobnobbing with Taylor and Francis from day one, or Spencer being made the head of NPI sans any meaningful qualifications for that position.

Oh, you'll say that the "movement" interest in Blodgett was due to his mainstream Republican connections and was thus somehow merit based.  Really? First, as he himself admits, he was out of the political game when he was recruited by Carto. Second, according to Wikipedia, his initial entry into the mainstream political world was via personal connections, and his father was a politician. So, even if Carto's interest was connected to Blodgett's past foray into Republican activism, that GOP activism itself was connected to a mainstream "good old boys network" that mirrors that of Der Movement. In the end, it all conflates to ethnic affirmative action.

Now, we’ll get confirmation of another Sallisian meme – that some Quota Queens realize that what they are doing is practically hopeless, and are only in it for the money:

…there are certain people out there that when somebody speaks up for what they advocate, they give you money. Carto realized the value of espousing a lost cause: there's money in it.

And here is (according to Blodgett) Carto’s opinion of Der Movement and his role in it:

I asked him one time, "Do you really think you're going to succeed at what you're trying to do?" And he said no. He said, "It's the only thing I can do. I have no hobbies except my garden. I don't have any children." He knows there's no way he's ever going to be influential like he once was. He also once said, "Todd, the problem we have is that everybody on our side is stupid." That's what he said.

Of course, Blodgett can be lying about all of that. Perhaps Carto never said any of it.  Perhaps Blodgett's perception of Carto as being primarily interested in making money is derived from Blodgett's dislike of Carto. But it does have the ring of truth to it, at least from my perspective.

Before I begin fisking Blodgett’s letter, let me begin by summarizing the three major flaws within it.

• 1. He conflates White nationalism with “White supremacism,” which really does not exist anymore to any significant extent, and is quite different from White nationalism. Anyone who mislabels today’s pro-White advocates, including White nationalists, as "White supremacists" is being so fundamentally dishonest that their mendacity suggests to you there is little or nothing of what they say that you should believe.
• 2. He conflates pro-White activism with Der Movement, while in fact the latter is merely the currently extant vehicle for the former, akin to how the Republican Party is currently the vehicle for American conservatism. The failures of the vehicle do not necessarily reflect upon the righteousness of the cause that vehicle allegedly supports. If the vehicle is no good, it should be replaced; you need not give up on the cause itself.
• 3. The righteousness of a cause and the objective facts upon which it is based do not disappear just because a particular person becomes disillusioned with the cause and/or with the vehicle currently embodying that cause. Facts about White demographic displacement, racial reality, anti-White structures of the System, the failures of globalism and multiculturalism, and the reality of ethnic genetic interests, do not disappear just because someone is angry that they got “stiffed” for money by Willis Carto, or because the exposure of their activity upset their family. 

OK, back to the letter.

AN OPEN LETTER TO WHITE SUPREMACISTS

I once trod the treacherous path you’re traveling and it wrecked my life. Taking a detour and exiting the nasty, racist road is as much in your best interest as it is America’s. 

I do agree that it is in the interest of people to leave the catastrophe of Der Movement, but I do NOT agree that they should disavow pro-White activism (two different things; see above). Now, could it be in their selfish personal interest to drop out of activism completely? Well, would it have been in the interest of Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn to never have become an anti-Soviet dissident? I suppose he would have had a more comfortable life if he hadn’t gone down that path, starting with that Stalin-critical letter that led him from the Red Army to the gulag during WW II. But would that have been in his overall interest?  Would that have led to the proper fulfillment of his life?  His destiny? His dignity and self-worth? Would that have been in the interest of his people?  What is interest anyhow?  What price interest?  And do personal interests include ethnic genetic interests? I say yes. Hence, we can see the interest, the personal interest, in being a racial advocate. Why is it, according to people like Blodgett, only in the interests of Whites, and not of other groups, to eschew racial activism? Why is social pricing, and hence the damage to material personal interests, always focused on Whites and on pro-White activism?

Further: What is America? The concept is essentially meaningless in any practical sense. What is it?  A land area where disparate groups of people live?  A nation state that has drifted away from its original purpose? An economic unit of consumers? What? A set of “ideals?” Ideals are not ultimate interests. As human beings, as evolved organisms, as people, our prime concern is with people; our ultimate interests are in genetic continuity. After all, the “ideals” are for who?  For “Americans?”  What’s an “American”?  Who are the “people” we are concerned with?  The American population is being demographically transformed.  So when we refer to “people” we can ask – “what people?”  Who?  Whom?  If a pregnant illegal alien crosses into the USA and gives birth, then that offspring is an “American citizen.” That’s an “American.” The concept of America, which has become disconnected from a distinct people, and has become unmoored from normal human interests and from basic biology, is, as I have stated, practically meaningless. The concern should be with specific people in America, viewing America and its ideals as a vehicle for meeting the needs of those people and their interests, not as a vehicle for their dispossession and destruction. Talk to me about White Americans, not of an abstract America. Thus, America has no inherent interests.  Only groups of people in America - like White Americans - have inherent interests.

And, by the way, even IF you want to focus on an abstract America and its equally abstract interests, your beloved multiculturalism is destructive to those American interests, and it brings in people who have no understanding of, or interest in, preserving the “ideals” traditionally associated with America, peoples whose presence and whose own ethnocentrism breeds racial and ethnic conflict. Even from the standpoint of abstract ideals, America is a failure, and a greater White homogeneity would only assist in preserving the ideals Blodgett allegedly cares about. So, Mr. Blodgett, you are doubly wrong.

Significant differences exist between legitimate conservatism…

Why is conservatism “legitimate?”  Because it is useless, accomplishes nothing, is part of the System, agrees with the fundamental premises of that System, and is essentially fake, controlled opposition?  In any case, we are NOT conservatives.  What is there to conserve?  I am a Far Right Revolutionary.

…and bigoted, racist hatred. 

Emotional nonsense. In any case, if you are against “bigoted, racist hatred” you should oppose that targeting Whites.

Do you hate minorities so much that you overlook the significant contributions made by Conservatives…

I oppose conservatives, moron.

…who are black, Jewish, Hispanic, and Gay, to the honorable causes of limited government, a strong national defense, lower taxes, and freedom for the individual?

All those ideals are meaningless if they are enjoyed by a different people, if MY people are race replaced.  What Whites should care about “the honorable causes of limited government, a strong national defense, lower taxes, and freedom for the individual” in a Brown America?  And even his own premise is silly, since the vast majority of Blacks, Jews, Hispanics, and Gays are leftists who oppose all of these “legitimate” and “honorable” conservative concerns. If you really cared about those concerns, then you’d want a White America, full of people who have repeatedly demonstrated a fidelity to those issues and concerns.

And anyway, the whole point of White nationalism is that we do NOT want to live in the same polity, in the same society, as non-White peoples, regardless of if they are “conservatives.” This idiot is speaking a different language than what the “white supremacists” he is addressing actually understand - they understand RACE and CIVILIZATION, not tax rates and limited government.  By the way, has conservatism actually achieved progress toward any of your “honorable” causes? No, America moves in the opposite direction, away from those ideals, because of racial demographics.

Further, these days, mainstream conservatives are called "Nazis" and attacked in the streets, GOP congressmen are shot at (e.g., Scalise), and GOP senators assaulted (e.g. Paul). Rational people see what's happening in America and view Blodgett's stupidity as either painfully naive or blatantly mendacious (and that was true when the letter was written, not just today).

If so, you’re subscribing to an agenda comprised of unadulterated HATRED. 

So, Whites defending their group interests is “unadulterated HATRED.” Other groups doing the same is wonderfully admirable, and as you note, not criticized by this buffoon, who thus, in his hypocrisy, essentially confirms the validity of the WN worldview.

The high-tech, PR-savvy…

They’re not.

…well-funded…

That’s true, although they always cry poverty.

…evildoers…

Hmmm. Call your opponents “evildoers.”  Cue Dr. Evil asking for “one million dollars.”  Grow up.

…you’ve thrown in with will alter your life in the most negative of ways – as personal experience taught me. 

So, this moron is angry at Carto over money, and he is upset that his activity with Pierce got exposed, so that’s the “personal experience” he’s talking about, that and being a FBI informant – a rat.

If happiness, stability, and success are your goals, then you must open your mind and change your heart. 

Sure! Supporting a System that hates you for your race, and practices de jure and de facto discrimination against you, and defames your race and civilization, is the road to happiness and stability.

It’s not too late to change, and your past can be a lesson, not a life sentence. The late Willis Carto – a professional White Supremacist/anti-Semite, who conjured up the fraud called Holocaust denial, and who spent 60 years promoting hatred – was my boss from 1995 to 1998. 

And what real qualifications did you have for that?  Besides being a High Truster named Blodgett? Besides being involved in the GOP due to family and other personal connections? Did you ever have an involvement in politics - either mainstream or Far Right - based purely on your own merits?

To my lasting regret, I raised nearly $3 million for his Liberty Lobby, and generated an even greater amount of advertising revenue for his publications.

With all the money floating around Der Movement, that’s no grand accomplishment.

Within a few years, my business partner was Dr. William L. Pierce – the founder of the National Alliance, who wrote ‘The Turner Diaries’. 

Affirmative action.

He and Carto were America’s leading neo-Nazis. Motivated by greed and a lust for power, Pierce, Carto, and I owned what was then the world’s most profitable, successful racist music company, Resistance Records. These facts, for which I’ve atoned, won’t ever go away.

The facts about White race replacement and the System’s anti-White racism “won’t ever go away” either.

I routinely dealt directly with sociopaths like David Duke, ‘Pastor’ Richard Butler, Erich Gliebe, and John Tyndall, and racist killers like Jamie Von Brunn, Eric ‘the Butcher’ Fairburn, Tommy Mair, Wade Michael Page, and Benjamin Nathaniel Smith, among many others. 

High Trusters!  Inner Hajnal!   

My life spiraled downward, resulting from my involvement in HATE. This included becoming a drug addict for seven+ years, getting divorced and nearly being killed in a knife fight. These tragic consequences and others could’ve been averted had I avoided the vile realm of White Supremacy, even as an opportunistic profiteer. 

Make sure you capitalize "HATE" just in case your readers are not sure of whether you disapprove or not.

What an imbecile. His personal choices, his defects, those he blames on a set of political beliefs. As if being pro-White means you must be a drug addict, and, gee whiz, you can’t find any anti-racist leftist drug addicts anywhere, much less Black ones, right? Only White activists get divorced and, of course, there's never been Whites knifed by racist criminal Negroes.  Bad things happen to people only if they are pro-White, and don't you forget it!  This guy’s “logic” and his writing style (“vile realm of White Supremacy”) is akin to that of a not-too-bright twelve year old girl.

Monitoring haters for the FBI as a full-time, paid informant…

Note - paid. Being on the side of the angels, against hate wasn’t enough. Like Judas, he wanted his thirty pieces of silver.  Betrayal for a price.  Take that, you cheapskate Carto!

…opened my eyes to the insecurity of most of those who were brain-washed into the counterproductive, evil world in which you’re now ensconced. 

Pure projection. All these apostates are insecure, personal defectives and failures, who get involved in the cause for the wrong, almost always personal, reasons, and leave for the same bad reasons. You’ll note that nowhere in this screed is any sort of reasoned, analytical rebuttal of White nationalist beliefs. It is all emotion, all personal issues, and all superficial leftist buzzwords.

Seeking personal redemption helped me realize a better life was, indeed, within my grasp. I slayed my demons, beat drug addiction and got my life back on track. You, too, can do this! Walking away isn’t hard, but remaining with hateful, violence-prone, racist losers will ruin you.

One basic problem with the “movement” is that is full of drug addicted, illogical, hysterical losers like Blodgett, who have NOTHING going for them but their ethnicity.

Removing your Swastikas, covering up racist tattoos, replacing Doc Martens boots with pricey athletic shoes and wearing tassled loafers, Polo shirts and khakis, and calling yourselves “identitarians” instead of neo-Nazis, fools no one. 

As if most WNs were like that. I thought stereotyping was "bigotry?"  By the way, if "no one" is being fooled by pro-White activists, why do you and your handlers worry so much about those haters?

If your ideas were sound, you’d not need to engage in such chicanery. Got it?

Pure projection.  If YOUR ideas were sound, you’d need not write a long screed that contains ZERO substantive content, and is nothing but “being an activist made be angry and unhappy, so it is bad.” Got it?  Your mendacity fools no one.

Question - if WN ideas are so unsound, then why are they repressed by the System/Left instead of debated and refuted?

I hope and pray you’ll turn your life around, and that you and all misguided activists leave the milieu of organized Hate. 

Join the System that hates you and is destroying your race and civilization. That'll turn your life around. Just make sure you're paid for it, amirite?

Those who admit they were wrong are in a great position to help make things right.

Yes, make things right by being a PAID informant.  You may as well make a buck when you “make things right,” eh?

Like many who are now wasting their lives in this putrid, so-called Movement, I’ve been jailed. More than once. 

Was that a direct result of your prior beliefs? If not, it is irrelevant.  If so, being jailed for your beliefs means that the anti-System worldview of WNs has validity – the System is repressively anti-White. Either way, you're wrong. And if you were jailed because of activity you did that was somehow connected with your work for Carto and/or Pierce, that's either on you - a mistake you made - or it is diagnostic of a repressive System (or both).  Either way, you're wrong...again.

But whether or not you’ll ever be locked up, as long as you harbor hateful, anti-Semitic, bigoted thoughts, you’re locked in a hellish jail of your own making. 

Huh?  Having a set of political beliefs is not a “hellish jail.” The real “hellish jail” is not the straw man of “hateful, anti-Semitic, bigoted thoughts” but instead it is the reality of multiracial America.

So, set yourself free; unlock your mind…

Yes, reject the System and embrace White nationalism. That's my prescription, although I'm sure that's not exactly what Blodgett has in mind here.

…and banish hate from your soul. 

Tell that to those who hate Whites.

Having learned this the hard way, it’s easy for me to see where you’ll end up, unless you alter your thinking and change your ways. 

Don’t blame a set of political beliefs for your personal inadequacies.

You CAN get your life on track, even if it wasn’t previously all that cool. It’s easier than you think, and you won’t regret it. Trust me, I know.

In summary, Blodgett is a meritless defective Quota Queen loser, elevated in Der Movement because of his High Truster ancestry, who left Der Movement for purely personal reasons, became a paid FBI rat, and now justifies his pathetic life by preaching to us as if he had a grand epiphany. But, hey, trust him...he knows. He knows how to be a useless asshole.

Once again – there isn’t a single substantive, objective argument against White nationalism in that letter.  Not a single one.  Nothing. It’s all emotion.  It’s all the story of a pathetic defective, by his own admission not a “true believer,” who got involved in the cause for all the wrong reasons, left for personal reasons, became a PAID FBI informant, and now spews girlish tirades – Evil! Vile! Hate! – assuming that all WNs are as defective as he was (and likely, still is), and will become ever-so-happy if they ditch their beliefs – ideas that he has no actual arguments against – and become more System zombies.

What a buffoon.

It is obvious to the reader of this post that I was rather irritated by Blodgett's letter; the combination of emotional non-argument, illogic, and empty platitudes was just too much to take. The disturbing question is this - how many people like this are there in Der Movement today?  How many are not true believers, how many are FBI informants, grifters, drug addicts, or other types of defectives? Then we have the Hermansson case, which demonstrated how easy it is for even a non-government actor to infiltrate pro-White activism; Der Movement is lucky Hermansson was only a (relatively) short-term information-gathering infiltrator and not a long-term mole. With his ancestry and ability to make high-level "movement" connections, he could have risen to a position of some influence, and did considerable damage.  His sexuality, as we can observe with others, would not have been a hindrance for this (I wonder if his sexuality was known by any of the "movement" people he interacted with during his infiltration).

One wonders if such moles currently exist and how high in the "movement" hierarchy are they?  Who are they and what are they doing?

Sallis Right Again: Political Population Genetics

And other news.

Another example of the politicization of science:

Isolation-by-distance models are part of the institutional creed of antiracialism used to critique claims of biological race concepts (BRCs). Proponents of antiracialism appeal to isolation-by-distance models to describe patterns of human genetic differences among and between groups as a function of distance. Isolation by distance has been referred to as the pattern that human genetic variation fits, distributing the differences we see as race throughout geographic space as a series of Gaussian gradients. Contemporary scientific critiques of BRCs fuse social constructionist race concepts with a description of the distribution of proportions of human genetic variation in geographic space as a function of distance. These two points are often followed by statements noting that there is only one human race... To address the shortcomings in the scientific critique of race, the author proposes combining Du Boisian demography with Darwinian evolutionary biology. From a Du Boisian demographic perspective, race is a product of racism, or race/ism, and is a heredity and inheritance system based on rules of partus sequitur ventrem and hypodescent. Race marks individuals and groups them to reproduce unequal relationships into which Europeans co-opted them. This synthesis propounds a new racial formation theory to understand the more general consequences of racism on genes and health outcomes.

This is an admission that much of modern population genetics, and pseudoscientific denials of racial reality, is based on “the institutional creed of antiracialism,” and not on genuine scientific empiricism.

...the differences we see as race throughout geographic space as a series of Gaussian gradients. Contemporary scientific critiques of BRCs fuse social constructionist race concepts with a description of the distribution of proportions of human genetic variation in geographic space as a function of distance.

Ignoring clustering and ignoring the ability of definitively assign race based on genetic data or on forensic anthropology.

To address the shortcomings in the scientific critique of race, the author proposes combining Du Boisian demography with Darwinian evolutionary biology.

"Du Boisian demography?" Do you need any more evidence that the “scientific” establishment has been completely co-opted by SJW lunacy and by Colored radicalism?

Everything I’ve ever written about the political objectives of population genetics is verified. And, by the way, do you think that “testing companies,” with their known biases and leaked admission of “owning racists” by fudging results, are immune to this politicization?

The pseudoscience of the Left mirrors that of the Right (e.g., HBD) - they start out with the desired conclusion and then work backward to try and justify it.

Should there be treason trials for selected HBDers?  Is there any way of connecting their activity to aiding China levying war against the United States?

The HBDers need to “pay” as well.

Considering all of the prominent HBDers, isn't it interesting that there is a correlation between promoting HBD and having one or more of the following characteristics:

1. Being critical and/or opposed to White nationalism

2. Consumed with hostility toward pan-Europeanism

3. Being of non-European ancestry and/or married to someone of non-European ancestry

4. Promoting one or more of the following: miscegenation, aracial citizenism, cognitive elitist IQ nationalism, pseudoscience

5. Open disdain for White ethnics, typically combined with worship of Jews and East Asians

6. Innate hostility for any memes that unite Europeans and innate tropism toward any memes that divide Europeans

7. Being "socially awkward" or some other type of mattoid, including defending child porn

Related material.

Read this, and remember that the Quota Queens deny that the affirmative action program exists.

I’m surprised that we have not yet heard from Der Movement that all of the UFOs in the news are actually Nazi flying saucers from Antarctica. 

What hypocrisy.  In Hungary, no less.  Remember this:

Author Marisa Abrajano, whose origins we can only imagine from her name and appearance, teaches political science at UC San Diego. Zoltan Hajnal also teaches at UC San Diego. Zoltan is a Hungarian name, so it’s unlikely his ancestors came over on the Mayflower. White Backlash is published by Princeton University Press.

This is the perfect symbol for our degenerate times. Foreigners tell the American founding stock how benighted and deserving of oblivion we are, and are published by one of the country’s most prestigious academic presses. We have work to do.

Maybe Hungarians should not have foreigners in their nation preaching to them about “European Brotherhood” while in reality opposing that “brotherhood” in their own nations.

A telling admission from the new Counter-Currents:

Nick JeelvyMay 31, 2021 at 2:30 pm

I must admit I had no idea what the point of this article was while I was writing it…

And that’s an article behind their paywall!  You just can’t make this stuff up.

Movement Analysis, 4/18/21

In all cases, emphasis added.

Colin Liddell’s Affirmative Right website gives this summary of DeAnna/Hood/Kirkpatrick, which is where I learned of the association:

KEVIN DEANNA (AKA (((Gregory Hood))) and (((James Kirkpatrick))))

A key figure in the pre- and early Alt-Right. DeAnna was the founder of the on-campus activist group Youth for Western Civilization (defunct). He was, and probably still is, one of the writers most respected by Alt-Righters, publishing articles in Radix, Counter-Currents, and American Renaissance under the pen name "Gregory Hood," and articles in VDARE under the by-line (((James Kirkpatrick))).

He excels at extremely lucid, mid-brain commentary pieces generated by the hamster wheel of the American news cycle, rather than deeper and more profound essays. DeAnna's role in the early Alt-Right has come under the SPLC spotlight thanks to his relationship with top doxxer Katie McHugh, with whom he had a romantic connection for several years. This has revealed that DeAnna once had connections to various more mainstream Conservative sites and organisations.

It seems that Liddell learned of this from the SPLC website, a place that I myself do not quote from (see below, on my policy). However, since Liddell has already discussed it on his own "movement" website, it can now be analyzed here. It is already out there in "movement" discourse.

Let’s consider Katie McHugh.

Concurrently, she began dating Kevin DeAnna. The two met in July 2013, according to McHugh, at a going-away party in Alexandria, Virginia, for a mutual friend leaving a conservative group.

McHugh’s relationship with DeAnna had been her entrée into the alt-right, and she had absorbed DeAnna’s friends by osmosis. DeAnna had wanted to marry her, she said, but McHugh, though she loved him, had several major qualms in the relationship. He was a deeply unhappy person, she felt, in a life of racist activism that had made him too toxic for mainstream society; “I think just because he was trapped in the alt-right, didn’t see a way out, made him very unhappy,” she said. He once told McHugh not to choose the same path, she said, to turn back while she could. He felt it was too late for him, she said.

Now, that is hearsay. It is one person talking, not under oath, about another, to a third party. If it is false, then it is defamation against DeAnna by McHugh. If it is true, then it is very disturbing that a very prominent “movement” activist has, or at least had, at one time, the belief that involvement in pro-White activism was a mistake that others should not make. Note that my own warnings against the "movement" is specifically about Der Movement, Inc. and not against activism itself. And, anyway, I'm not a "movement" "leader" encouraging others to get involved in Der Movement while at the same time privately decrying it. But, we do not know if McHugh's comments are accurate or not.

One thing that I believe that no one argues against is that the DeAnna-McHugh relationship was real. McHugh is a person of low character to have revealed all of this private information (to the extent that it is true; however, even if it is not true, it is still publicly humiliating to all involved) to the opposition, and it is very disturbing that such a person so easily and seamlessly entered high levels of the “movement.”  Although the Irish are considered “lower” than Inner Hajnal Germanics, they are still Northwest Europeans and so there’s a strong dose of affirmative action for them as well.

Bannon (see below, for more hearsay)  is Irish and Brimelow married a "Lydia Sullivan" - an analysis here - so the Irish seem to be considered a higher form of specimen compared to the two-foot-tall superstitious Afrowops sliding around on their skin grease and hair oils. We must remember that the Irish are, after all, a "100% Nordish" "assimilable minority."

Their differences went deeper — and stranger — than that, and allowed McHugh to see inside a truly bizarre subculture. McHugh was a Catholic, while DeAnna was a member of the Wolves of Vinland, a group based near Lynchburg that was focused around a neopagan theology based on self-improvement and feats of strength, as well as coded white nationalism. The idea was to cast off the bounds of modern Judeo-Christian society and find a way back to pre-Christian northern-European culture. 

Sigh. What gives any of these people the right to talk about “optics” with respect to anyone else?

McHugh sometimes accompanied DeAnna on weekend trips down to the Wolves’ headquarters for what they called a “moot” — a ceremony in which the assembled Wolves would smear ash on their bodies around a fire and give what McHugh described as “dramatic speeches” about self-sufficiency and relying on the other group members. They would then sit around the fire and drink beers.

Again, this is hearsay. But, let us assume it is true. Is that the “leadership” of your “movement?”

According to their argument, they can’t be white supremacists because they say that Jews and people of East Asian descent have a higher average IQ. This both whitewashes their bigotry and feeds into the alt-right’s victim mentality, especially as it relates to Jews.

Well, that’s consistent with some of the things I’ve been saying about the HBDers. They don't want to just come out and be pro-White, thus they grovel to Jews and East Asians.

McHugh never told her bosses about her ties to people like Brimelow…In 2015, McHugh says, she witnessed an encounter between Bannon and the white nationalist activist Devin Saucier at Breitbart’s party following CPAC that has stuck in her memory as a sign of just how permissive Bannon was willing to be. At the time she was good friends with Saucier, who has edited for Taylor’s publication American Renaissance under a pen name and who, in 2017, wrote a pseudonymous article titled “Why I Am (Among Other Things) A White Nationalist.” Taylor calls himself a “white advocate” and has written, “When blacks are left entirely to their own devices, Western civilization — any kind of civilization — disappears." McHugh brought Saucier along to the party.

As McHugh recalls it, Bannon looked at Saucier, sizing him up. He asked, “Who do you work for? Peter?” referring to Brimelow. Saucier, smiling, said no. Bannon said, “Far to the right, right?” Saucier responded in the affirmative. “AmRen? American Renaissance?” Saucier said, “Yes, sir,” and Bannon put his hand on his shoulder and said, “Well, we’re all fighting the same fight.”

And here we are in 2021, with everything collapsed and things worse than ever. They really fought that fight effectively, huh?  Are you in any way surprised?

More on the Katie McHugh fiasco.

Former Breitbart editor Katie McHugh's voyage from politically incorrect mini-celebrity to Southern Poverty Law Center informant provided plenty of sensationalist media last month. 

Again, that a person of such low character was so easily and quickly accepted in the “movement” tells you much. On the other hand, in contrast, there is a cordon sanitaire around the “insane” Sallis.  You figure it out.

The 29-year-old McHugh, who is based out of Oakton, Virginia…

Oakton, Virginia, eh? The nexus of power!  The central node of "movement" reality!  Hail HBD!

…decided to publicly come out as the person who violated her friends and colleagues' trust, likely in pursuit of a Christian Picciolini style "deradicalization" career. 

Picciolini being the Arab-looking coastal guinea whose ancestry was that to which purebred mountain wop Conte favorably compared his own.

According to McHugh's narrative, rehashed in a recent Slate podcast, she was being "radicalized" by members of the Trump administration, paleo-conservatives and alt-rights. McHugh goes further by claiming to have been a victim of peer pressure and a cult-like environment.

So, a person with no strong views, a shallow “activist” so weakly converted, entered the high levels of your “movement.”

After a dozen interviews with people who knew Katie McHugh personally from 2015-18 and scores of emails we have reviewed, National Justice can report that Katie McHugh has left out big details in her story, particularly a case where she personally entrapped unknowing people in an event she organized, who she later sold out to left-wing political police.

Again, it is a question of character.

McHugh is reported to have given every email, every phone number and every text message she ever received during this period to opposition researchers and political police, like Rosie Gray and the SPLC.

There is no hard evidence, but sources close to McHugh speculate she may have received a 5-figure sum for these private communications.  

Disgusting. That’s enough about that. No accountability for any of the people responsible for bringing this creature into Der Movement.

Doing research about the freaks of Der Movement, I came across a lot of information that will not be specifically discussed, in any detail, here at the present time. My policy is that I discuss two types of information concerning the “movement.” First, anything that is reported in the mainstream media is obviously reasonable to discuss; it is in the general public domain. Buzzfeed can be considered part of the mainstream media, on the online periphery. Second, anything that is reported on the Far Right, broadly defined, is also reasonable to discuss, since it is already openly in the “movement” domain. Thus, reading Colin Liddell’s Affirmative Right website, I found out about the Hood-DeAnna connection. Daniel Friberg brought to the general attention of the “movement” the Pilleater tape, and Friberg and Forney (with Liddell) openly discussed Polignano’s comments about Johnson. National Justice fits here as well.

On the other hand, information directly coming from anti-White, hard-Left activists, even though this can be found online, will not be discussed here. My “take” is that it would be better if none of this be made public. It would have been better if all of the abovementioned material had never come to light, but if it has already come out in the mainstream, or in the “movement,” then the milk has already been spilled, so to speak, and the issues can be addressed. But if the Far Left and the “watchdog” groups spill milk, I do not believe that any attention should be focused on it. I'm not going to be the first one to do it. However, if that information is picked up by the mainstream media, or disseminated by “movement” gossips, I have no control over that; in that case, the milk is obviously very publicly spilled, and, once again, it will be discussed here, if it is relevant. With respect to private things of significance that I know of from my own personal experiences in the “movement,” I will not discuss those matters here.

The only general, non-specific, comments I will make about all of this at the current time is that it is somewhat interesting how many “different” “movement” writers and personages are actually the same person writing under different pseudonyms. There are probably more such instances than just the ones breathlessly reported by the Reds. You also have people who write articles about operational security and then who leave links between all of their pseudonyms and between those pseudonyms and their IRL activity, thus being outed by the opposition.  Finally, I note that while Der Movement hates White ethnics, particularly Southern Europeans, Hispanics, including those with New World admixture, are A-OK.

But, then, do you expect Der Movement to make any sense whatsoever?

Interestingly, it seems to me that Der Movement is becoming increasing less tolerant of, and increasingly hostile to, White ethnics, particularly Southern Europeans. Der Movement has always been hostile to these people but, in a relative sense, I believe that Der Movement was the most tolerant of White ethnics in the years 1995-2010. Der Movement was generally completely dismissive of, and hostile to, White ethnics before 1995, and has been becoming more and more hostile since 2010. The pre-1995 attitude was the usual WN 1.0 Nordicism, with a superficial veneer of pan-Europeanism in some quarters from 1995-2010 to pad memberships and donations, and then the increasing hostility since 2010, which needs to be considered. 

There is a correlation between the increasing post-2010 hostility and the rise of the Alt Right. I usually refute the leftist paradigm that pro-White activists are motivated by emotional problems and a search for identity, and are people who have nothing else going for them other than their attachment to "whiteness." However, while that paradigm was clearly false for WN 1.0, I wonder if it does have some validity for WN 2.0. The Alt Right seems to have been enriched with younger Type I ethnic fetishists, people who indeed seem involved in activism to make up for personal deficiencies and who have little else other than their racial identities. Thus, among the majority of these "activists" who are Herrenvolk, there's a tendency toward an exaggerated Nordicism, and a navel-gazing focus on their own ethnicity. We can then understand why hostility toward non-Nordic Europeans, fueled by the  narcissism of small differences, is increasing since the rise of WN 2.0 (including the failed Alt Right). At the same time, even during the 1995-2010 period, there was always a strong undercurrent of Nordicism, including active WN 1.0 Nordicists, and these types were always looking for opportunities for a resurgence. The HBD-Nordicist-ethnonationalist alliance of WN 2.0, centered on the Alt Right, provided that opportunity.

Let’s consider Saturday’s Johnson-Taylor milksop interview (4/17/21). I call that interview "milksop" because it was completely weak and non-confrontational in every aspect; by a sportsball analogy, it was the equivalent of "batting practice."

Let’s consider the major memes they promoted in that interview:

1. Let’s just go back to the “traditional America” – all the policies that ultimately, and quickly, failed and were completely reversed. And let’s praise the fraud Rushton as well.

2. And then we have the promotion of HBD. The problem is that “White racial consciousness” is not fully compatible with HBD (see below).

3. They discussed: How have White people been tricked? The word “Jew” wasn’t uttered in that interview. Not one time. Surprise! Let’s reference Michael Woodley, but not Kevin MacDonald (the Jewish work, not the HBD Nordicism). Surprise!

4. Then Johnson does his usual gaslighting about Taylor’s groveling to Asians. The coward Johnson refuses to debate individuals such as myself, or to directly engage with the ideas here at EGI Notes. The coward Johnson also fails to challenge Taylor’s comments about blanket Asian superiority, such as:

I think Asians are objectively superior to whites by just about any measure that you can come up with in terms of what are the ingredients for a successful society.

There’s no need to make outlandish (and historically inaccurate) statements like that in order to make the simple point that Asian success in America disproves the idea of a “White supremacist America.”

My counter-argument to Johnson’s gaslighting is here. Instead of directly addressing that, the limited-mentality coward Johnson simply repeats the same points over and over again. It’s like listening to an obsessive compulsive retard.

I call Johnson out as a no-character coward; I call out all of these people for refusing to debate, for refusing to engage. The same argument they make about the System – “the Left wants to censor us because they can’t win the argument” – can be used by myself against Johnson and all the rest. They have to censor and avoid debate because they have zero confidence in their own arguments.

Oh, and yes, the pro-Asian arguments of Taylor don’t have “political significance” – is that why Derbyshire (and his Arctic Alliance nonsense) is given a forum at Amren conferences?

5. The Asian-Black alliance – “Asians were sensible” (repeated at least three times) – sure they were. Taylor was surprised by anti-White attitudes among Asians. I was not. I have been preaching for years the idea that the existential meaning of Asians is hatred of Whites. I have turned out to be right, and Taylor wrong. At some point, the rank-and-file need to recognize who is always right and who is always wrong. 

Taylor said that he “needs to dig deeper” into the problem.  Yeah…how about that Asians are a tropical colored people who have an innate racial animus toward Whites and toward Western civilization?

Is that "deep" enough? Keep on digging!  Maybe, at some point, your hobbit hole tunnel will reach into EGI Notes and you'll find some enlightenment.

Lynnian Fraud

The fundamentally dishonest “movement.”

The anti-White ethnic (self-described) yellow supremacist site American Renaissance repeats Lynn’s lies here, which I’ve already refuted.

Also see here.

And get this - important sections reproduced here (emphasis added):

Despite the minor differences between the studies, our results demonstrate quite clearly that raw scores [on Raven's Coloured Progressive Matrices] of children from Sicily are not lower than those [of children from the North and Central-South] reported by Cornoldi et al. (2010). On the contrary, they are sometimes higher…Our examination of intelligence test score differences between the north and south of Italy led to results that are very different from those reached by Lynn (2010a). Our results demonstrate that by using intelligence tests to assess differences in ability rather than using achievement scores as a proxy for intelligence, children from the south of Italy did not earn lower scores than those from the north of Italy. Rather, they were even higher in Raven's CPM...

You see, real academics use actual intelligence tests, as opposed to “PISA tests.”  Note how Lynn and his acolytes ignore actual intelligence test scores that yield results that they do not like – while eagerly clinging to “proxy” tests (e.g., PISA achievement tests) that yield results of which they approve. 

...Naglieri et al. (submitted for publication) studied the differences between the psychometric qualities of the CAS [Cognitive Assessment System] for the Italian and US standardization samples. Although the goal of that study was not to make regional comparisons, they did report that there were no significant differences (F(1, 806)=2.19, p=.11) between the average CAS-Italian Full Scale standard scores (set at a mean of 100 and standard deviation of 15) for students from the northern (M=100.5; SD=13.2), central (M=101.2; SD=11.9), and southern (M=103.1; SD=11.6) regions of Italy. The mean standard scores for the students in the north were only slightly lower than the mean for those in the south (effect size=.21). These results suggest that a test of intelligence that measures basic neuropsychological processes, and does not include academically laden verbal and quantitative tests, yields small differences between the regional groups. These findings also amplify the importance of measuring intelligence directly when comparing groups and argue against using reading, math and science test scores as "proxies for intelligence" (Lynn, 2010a).

Lynn - wrong,wrong, wrong.  Perfect HBD flim-flam.  Lies, lies, and more lies.

As previously chronicled at this blog, Lynn believes in a simple additive model of IQ – that is, e.g.,that an even mix of a 100 IQ population with a 70 IQ population gives a 85 IQ population. Now, that doesn’t work out for African-Americans of course. Now, let’s look at his Afrowop speculations. According to this simpleton’s additive model ideas, if he believes that Sicilians have an IQ of “89” due to admixture of Southern Europeans (presumably Northern Italian types with IQs in the “Northcentral European range”) with “low IQ North Africans,” then he must believe that North Africans have IQs in the 70s and that Sicilians are about 50% North African – both ludicrously incorrect.

And don’t get me started on the mysteriously variable Irish IQ either.

The man is a moronic idiot and a buffoon. As is anyone who believes his discredited nonsense.

And that all underscores the fundamental dishonesty of American Renaissance. Even if a HBD yellow supremacist site like that believes Lynn, they should at least state the fact that Lynn has plenty of critics (including on the Right) about these specific issues, even if for no other reason than to say those critics are wrong.  But, no.  Let the gullible reader believe that all folks on the Right follow Lynnian doctrine. It’s religious dogma, after all. Don’t question the faith!

An appropriate title for Counter-Currents.

Disgusting hypocrisy.

Q: What is ethnonationalism?

A: Ethnonationalism is the idea according to which each distinct ethnic group should enjoy political sovereignty and a homeland or ethnically homogenous homelands. Opposed to this is multi-culturalism, which affirms that multiple ethnic groups should share the same homelands and governments.

Unfortunately, that doesn’t apply to, say, Hungary, eh?  Vile hypocritical scum.

Q: What is white nationalism?

A: White nationalism is a political philosophy which seeks to define national identity in racial terms rather than in terms of religion, culture, or religious faith. White nationalism makes more sense in the context of colonial European societies such as the United States, in which the older white ethnic identities have been weakened by intermixing of immigrant stock, thereby creating an ever more united white generic identity.

That’s not the same definition of WN he’s given on his blog and his podcasts, in which he dishonestly attempts to equate ethnonationalism and White nationalism.  Here, he gives a more correct definition of WN, but then dishonestly attempts to restrict it to the USA and other European diaspora nations. Yes, now, run along and sell more Yockey books, you despicable turd.

“Global White Nationalist,” indeed.  Think of all the men’s room urinals around the world as yet unexplored!

Another characteristic of the alt-right that Salazar highlights distinguishes it sharply from supremacist movements and various forms of the Old Right: the sense that there is time. Alt-right thinkers express an optimism and patience entirely lacking in old Right-wing movements.

Sure!  Plenty of time!  Who cares that the four years of the Trump Presidency were completed wasted by comically inept Quota Queens?  Just keep on sending in dem dere “D’Nations!”

“White Kung-fu” (John Derbyshire)

A better title: “White measured groveling.”  

I have to say that I completely agree with anti-racist activists that Der Movement is a fraud and that it preys on the insecurities of troubled (typically young) White men.  Where I disagree is with the antis’ assertions that racial nationalism itself is bad, that Der Movement and racial nationalism are one and the same  (the former is merely an existing perversion of the latter), that all people in racial nationalism are troubled souls, and that the exploitation of the troubled souls that do exist (people who typically turn apostate and become antis themselves) are to recruit them for racial nationalism – no, actually it is to exploit them for “D’Nations,” to create “followers” for egotistical “leaders,” and to subvert authentic racial nationalism by tempting these flawed people into cul-de-sacs like HBD, ethnonationalism, and Nordicism.

Racism is Not Mental Illness

A brief argument.

See this.  That Counter-Currents essay is fine as far as it goes (*), but I would like to make two brief further arguments against the latest politicized fad (**) of attempting to equate “racism” with “mental illness.” I make the arguments of (1) adaptive fitness and (2) universalism.

1. Adaptive fitness. The essence of what is traditionally considered “racism” – preference for one’s racial ingroup and hostility to racial outgroups when those outgroups are in competition with the ingroup – is quite obviously adaptive behavior, given the greater genetic similarity of ingroup vs. outgroup (***). Further, “racism” can produce mutually beneficial networks of “ethnic nepotism” among ingroup members, as well as the production and maintenance of a culture congenial to the ingroup, both of which boosts the biological fitness of the ingroup compared to outgroups.  

To label adaptive behavior “pathological” is objectively an oxymoron. Indeed, labeling a group’s adaptive behavior as “pathological” is an act of aggression against that group – serving someone else’s adaptive interests – and, ironically, can itself be considered “racism” against the group so targeted.

See this for more about the genetic interests involved. “Racism” can prevent ingroup genocide, it can prevent the dispossession and displacement of one’s people, and benefit each member of the group whose individual interests are protected by the “racism” that benefits the whole.

2. Universalism. The same standards of mental health vs. mental illness should apply to all peoples, especially if we are to accept the “non-racist” universalism of the System/Left. Then how to explain that the same behaviors that are labeled “pathological racism” in Whites are labeled as “healthy expressions of identity,” “enlightened self-interest,” and/or “justifiable group defense” when applied to non-Whites? How and why is “mental illness” contingent upon the racial identity of those diagnosed?

No doubt the System/Left will trot out their typical sophistry attempting to explain why only Whites can be racist, but this simply exposes their particularism and rejection of Universalist truths – in fact, a rejection of the “anti-racism” they wish to impose specifically and only on White behavior.

When any behavior – much less adaptive behavior! – is labeled as mental illness in one group but labeled as healthy expression in another group, alarm bells should go off. And when that behavior is indeed adaptive, the uneven labeling reflects nothing more or less than a thinly disguised attack on the group whose adaptive behavior is hypocritically pathologized and unfairly stigmatized.

If the System/Left wants to be exercise particularism, rather than universalism, on this subject, in opposition to their oft-stated alleged fundamental Universalist beliefs, then they expose both their hypocrisy and their anti-White animus. If Whites are “special” in the negative sense in that only their “racism” is a symptom of “mental illness,” then why shouldn’t pro-Whites adopt a positive particularism in defense of their race?  

Particularism is inexorably linked to “racism” – thus, if the System/Left supports particularism, then this gives moral legitimacy to “racism,” and if they fall back on universalism, then their attacks against a specifically White form of “racism” is hypocritical and illegitimate.  

Note that my arguments can also be turned around to support the idea (asserted in the Counter-Currents article) that xenophilia is true mental illness, as xenophilia  works against adaptive fitness; further, the (Universalist) human norm is to be ethnocentric, which, to the System/Left, is acceptable and healthy for all groups except Whites.

Notes:

*However, given that Greg Johnson is in the habit of ascribing “insanity” to his critics, that essay is hypocritical.

**That homosexuality was first a mental illness and then not, purely on the basis of sociopolitical trends, indicates the biases involved, which the Counter-Currents essay rightfully mentions.

***When individuals use the “relative finder” function of whatever personal genetic ancestry test that they have taken – a reasonably objective feature of such tests as it compares genetic kinship (similarity) between different customers – what do they find?  Almost always they find matches to people from the same race as them, many deriving from the same or similar ethnic ancestry.  And why not?  Race and ethnicity are akin to large scale extended families, and ethnic nepotism is just a broader and more diluted version of familial nepotism – with the adaptive value of the broadness (the numbers involved) more than compensating (by several orders of magnitude) the dilution of the relatedness.

Apostate Woes

And other news.  Some notes on scifi.

Read this utter nonsense.  That represents the archetype of the stereotypical silly, superficial, moronic, and childish apostate from Far Right politics.

First, we note that this individual’s involvement in Far Right politics was motivated by personal issues, not by ideology nor by any sort of deep ideological commitment and intellectual thought process. These types are always motivated by personal problems, a need to “belong,” a need to “rebel” against family and society, a childish need to “shock “and draw attention to themselves in a narcissistic, infantile manner. Thus, if they no longer have their personal issues, or if they discover that their Far Right comrades are more interested in actualizing political and metapolitical goals rather than being a social worker for defective losers, or if these types satisfy their person needs and mask their inadequacies through other activities, then they no longer require, or depend upon, their masquerade as a “Far Right activist.”  As there was never any authentic ideological motivation or commitment, the loss of their personal need for self-validation through rightist politics results in repudiation of their insincere belief system.  Indeed, they lash out at authentic Far Right activists who they see as “failing them,” rather than understanding that the reverse is true.  Truly pathetic.

Second, such specimens exhibit a truly childish worldview in which the objective Threat of Color must mean that every single Colored on the face of the Earth is a hostile, White-hating, criminal monster. Thus, finding some Colored individuals, even just one, who do not behave as depraved monsters is sufficient for these faux-activists to decide that the entire Colored Threat is false. This is reflective of their navel-gazing, highly personal view of rightist politics.  It’s not that masses of Coloreds, on a global level, are a threat to White racial interests; oh no, their focus is on how individual Coloreds interact with them personally.  Meet a single friendly Negro who doesn’t bash your head in and steal your wallet and your entire racial worldview immediately evaporates.  All of the objective facts that ostensibly motivated your political activism evaporate if some non-White nods hello to you on the street.  It sounds ludicrous, but this is actually the “epiphany” that many of these airheaded nitwits actually have.

Ultimately, the objection of these apostates is that have been personally disappointed by the "movement."  It didn't satisfy their personal and private needs and wants. Of course, the same can be said, to a lesser degree, of non-apostates who simply, quietly drop out of the "movement" "scene" without making a fuss about it.  I remember being quite stunned by one drop-out of WN 1.0 analog activism who explained himself to me thus  -"they (note: his "movement" colleagues) only pretended to like me because of the work I was doing for the group, they didn't like me for who I am; they didn't care about me as a person."  Not wanting to be rude, and not wanting to add to his "emotional trauma," I hid how shocked I was by that comment, but I remember thinking - of course that is true, how could you ever been so naive to believe otherwise?  

Why do people working together on a project, for a cause, have to like each other, and be genuine, caring friends?  That seems to me to be a quite feminine attitude - we all must hold hands, tiptoe through the tulips, and agonize about our "feelings." No. Employees at a company do not have to like each other, players on a sports team do not have to like each other, faculty in an academic department do not have to like each other, students in the same class do not have to like each other, and people collaborating in a "movement" do not have to like each other either. Any friendships and/or relationships that develop are a byproduct, a side-effect, of the official interaction; it is not required or in any way necessary. Likewise, a "movement" does not have to satisfy the personal needs and desires of an activist. If it does so, that's great, but it is no necessary (granted, the "movement" must not repulse its activists, but the lack of a negative is not the same as the presence of a positive).  

Anyone who leaves a "movement" because of personal disappointment in how it affected them in the sense of not fixing their deep-seated issues is not the sort of person who should have been involved in that "movement" to begin with. The problem is not Normal Lowell. The problem is the idiot who wrote that article.

This is one reason I vehemently oppose the “big tent” strategy supported by poor judgment, failed Quota Queen “leaders.” Yes, we should have outreach.  Yes, we need to recruit.  Yes, we need to reach out to the White masses.  Yes, eventually, we want a mass movement. But, the leadership cadre, the activist core, the human material that makes up your movement – assuming it is a real movement and not a fraud – need to be high quality, genuine, authentic, ideologically committed and serious people. The typical Der Movement approach of accepting any and all Whites who can fog a mirror held up to their nose and who can mumble memorized gibbering of fossilized “movement” dogma is a recipe for failure. Particularly, accepting any and all “youth,” including and especially troubled teenagers and young adults, people who are so pathetically eager for acceptance and belonging, people whose ONLY positive characteristic is being White and ostensibly on board “the movement train,” without any other positives to contribute, this is an error.  There needs to be a long apprenticeship, a seasoning, a series of trials and tests, before a person is fully accepted.

Well, well, well - the Millennial Woes scandal. Sallis right, Johnson wrong. Sallis is Milady-skeptic, Sallis promotes MGTOW, Sallis questions the presence of women in the “movement,” Sallis demands we have standards for leadership instead of affirmative action, Sallis opposes the “big tent approach.”  Johnson takes the opposite view on those issues.

I have to say I know little about this Millennial Woes person.  My understanding is - and if I am wrong I stand corrected and I do apologize - is that he is a cigarette-smoking bisexual Millennial Scottish WN 2.0 Alt Righter who makes videos and speaks at Far Right conferences. He apparently is on good relations with Johnson, and is apparently very well known among WN 2.0 Alt Right circles (which is why I know little about him, given that I am vehemently opposed to WN 2.0 and the Alt Right).

In any case, in summary, this latest “movement” humiliation and Quota Queen dust-up involves the Millennial Woes (who is openly known as Colin Robertson) scandal, which apparently has to do with some yeastbucket complaining about Robertson, re: something sexual, and Collett investigating while Robertson steps away from activism (at least for now). Apparently, Gaslighting Greg Johnson is taking a pro-Woes position while crazed ethnofetishist Colin Liddell is hostile.  Apparently the two Colins have had a falling out.  

Far from it for me to be a “low information moralizer;” so since I know nothing more about this than what is stated above, and since I don’t have a dog in the fight to care enough to learn more, I’ll limit my comments to broad generalities:

1. I could say this is what happens when you let women involved in “movement” “activism.”  But that would be unfair since (a) homosexual sexual harassment occurs in WN 2.0 as revealed by Pilleater, and (b) point 2 below.

2. I remember the WN 1.0 analog meetings we knuckle-dragging Nutzi Neanderthal Boomers and Gen Xers were having back in the 90s. There were women at those meetings.  Somehow, there were never any scandals of either the heterosexual or homosexual nature.  Fancy that.  It’s almost as if – perish the thought! – WN 2.0 is far inferior to WN 1.0 in human material and in the seriousness and judgment of its participants.  It’s almost as if – gasp! – Millennials and other paragons of “youth” act like jackasses.  

3. This is hypocrisy.  See this for what I mean by that.  Simply outrageous, particularly in the context of the previous links. A completely bizarre and cringeworthy tweet. Milady objects. Go to CC meetings at your own risk as well, Pilleater.

4. Once again, Der Movement is humiliated.  And you can’t say you haven’t been warned here at this blog (and at Western Destiny) of what an utter disaster the “movement” was, is, and always will be.  Now, WN 1.0 was indeed an utter failure and a humiliating disaster, but WN 2.0 is infinitely worse, essentially 2.0 repeats the errors of 1.0 and then adds its own layers of tragicomic stupidity. It may very well be true that Millennial Woes did nothing wrong; it may very well be mendacious yeastbucketism. It doesn't matter. Having these WN 2.0ers publicly humiliate themselves with their drama and scandals and feuds does damage to pro-White activism, regardless of the details underlying it all.

Johnsonian hypocrisy:

Embittered people like Colin Liddell are now functionally indistinguishable from antifa. 

I despise Liddell, but that from Johnson is unfair and hypocritical.  After all, Spencer can say the same about Johnson and his obsessive critiques of Richie Rich.  Why is it that people like Johnson, who promote the idea of "punching right," have glass jaws when it comes to criticism of themselves and their friends?  Liddell has just as much right (no pun intended) to "punch right" as does Johnson. Third party observers can judge for themselves who they believe is correct or incorrect.

All of these individuals – Johnson, Spencer, Colin Robertson, Colin Liddell, Steadman, Parrott and Heimbach, Brimelow and Derbyshire, Forney and Friberg, all of the HBDers and “race realists” (Taylor, KMacD, etc.),  Anglin and Roissy, Duke and Strom, the great man on the mountaintop (*) and his feuding rival Covington, Gliebe and the swastika-soled boots, all of them – should be observed with bemusement, from a distance, from the viewpoint of a third party observer. Taking sides in these feuds and scandals is a useless exercise, because BOTH sides in each case are no damn good. A pox on both their houses. The only reasonable interpretation of this latest nonsense is that it is yet another reason to eschew Der Movement, Inc. and look toward a New Movement.  

Instead of giving those grifters money, donate to Salter instead.  On Genetic Interests alone is more valuable than all the "work" of those aforementioned "activists" put together.  

*I will say this though, for all my criticism of Pierce and his behavior and ideology, it is true that American White nationalism collapsed after his death and never recovered.  And it appears the UK is not any better.  Was the death of Pierce the real end – or at least the beginning of the end - of the WN 1.0 era?  Then there was a brief interregnum, and the rise of Spencer and Johnson (more feuding rivals) marked the rise of WN 2.0.  

Original hypothesis – given the level of neoteny in East Asians, “White male yellow fever” sexual interest in East Asian females is sublimated pedophilia.

New insight – given the relative lack of sexual dimorphism in East Asians, “White male yellow fever” sexual interest in East Asian females is sublimated homosexuality.

New synthesis, updated hypothesis – given the combination of neoteny and relative lack of sexual dimorphism in East Asians, “White male yellow fever” sexual interest in East Asian females is sublimated pederasty. 

Is “yellow fever” masking a desire to have sex with underage boys?  Does this mean that HBD is sublimated pederasty?  Are there psychological and biometric analyses that can be performed to test these hypotheses?

Typical nonsense. The best science fiction writer (by far) is the late Gene Wolfe. Nothing that anyone else has written surpasses The Book of the New Sun. That book series is the scifi/fantasy equivalent of Moby Dick. And in actuality, Bradbury's best work is a non-scifi novel, Dandelion Wine, about an America long gone. Dune (which I have read, and saw the movie and miniseries), is a very good book, but nothing compared to Wolfe's best. van Vogt's Voyage of the Space Beagle is good stuff. For more light-hearted fare, Jack Vance is unsurpassed; beginners should start with his Dying Earth short tales, which have been criticized by feminists as too male-oriented, which should be the best seal of approval there is. Vance's novels involving Cugel (one of the greatest characters in scifi/fantasy history) are first rate and hilarious, and Planet of Adventure is excellent, as are his Demon Princes stories, particularly the finale, The Book of Dreams. Asimov is over-rated, but his Foundation series is indeed excellent, and thought-provoking from a broad civilizational view. There are many other great scifi books and writers. Conflating the best to Herbert and Bradbury is absurd.

This picture does not inspire confidence in current coronavirus research.

I agree with what Johnson says here.

The American Right has morally and intellectually discredited itself with its reaction to the corona pandemic.

Very true, but as any reader of EGI Notes well knows, you read that here first, many weeks before Johnson’s belated epiphany.  The few times the Quota Queens write or say anything useful, there are far behind the curve of this blog.

And of course, by letting deranged scum like “Stronza” post comments on his moderated blog, Johnson himself must be counted among the rightists who have been so discredited.

It’s just the flu, bro!

The biography of Jack Ma?  ET phone home!

Not good enough, Trump. Please release the data.  I believe it, but how can we all build treason evidence against HBD without the stone cold facts?  Keep in mind that EGI Notes was among the first Far Right blogs promoting the "Chinese lab release" paradigm (while the HBD filth were promoting Chinese government propaganda lies about a fictional "American bioweapon."

A better title – can you trust Der Movement?

I have a distinct dislike for the journalistic class as a whole. They do not so much report news as collectively make the news, according to a peculiar pack mentality, which combines commonly-agreed designated good guys and bad guys, but also sometimes brutal and erratic shifts collective opinion, not according to the whims of an official chief, but a strange and disturbing hive mind.

A better version:

I have a distinct dislike for Der Movement as a whole. It does not so much report the truth about race as collectively distort the truth, according to a peculiar Nordicist and/or HBD pack mentality, which combines commonly-agreed designated good ethnies and bad ethnies, but also sometimes brutal and erratic shifts collective opinion, not according to the whims of an official chief, but a strange and disturbing hive mind.