Anti-Booth

Opposing politicized science. 

Look at this shocking display of a lack of scientific objectivity and integrity.

[Thanks to Gaston from Gab pointing that out]

What a mendacious piece of filth this Booth is.

That confirms everything I always write concerning the highly political nature of population genetics. Booth's agenda is NOT science; it is politics. It is an admission that politically-motivated “scientists” are going to intentionally, and with malice aforethought, LIE to the public about the meaning of genetic studies, in this case about ancient DNA samples, including LYING about the identities of the ancient peoples and their objectively determined relationships with modern populations.

This is why population genetics studies need to be examined with an extremely skeptical eye - because these studies are being performed and presented to advance political agendas. The authors sometimes OPENLY admit it, as in this case. And it is not only the interpretative section of a paper (e.g. the Discussion) that requires close examination. In addition, methodology can be chosen and modified to yield desired results – for example, the choice of reference populations for supervised admixture analysis or the choice of population comparisons in PCA and for other types of analysis. Population genetics studies are very sensitive to “input” with respect to what the “output” is and it is therefore very easy for population geneticists to skew the data in a particular direction based upon how the data were generated.  And omission is as important as commission – when have you seen researchers ever do direct kinship analyses of human populations? When have you seen genetic integration approaches applied to human genetics data? Approaches that would produce politically incorrect data are avoided, while the methods that are utilized can be, and are, designed so as to obfuscate truth. Couple all of that with left-wing political bias in interpretation and - presto! – “woke” “science” is generated.

Real scientists should objectively and dispassionately present and discuss their data, and the sociopolitical interpretations and ramifications of that data are for others to determine. Science is not about putting political “spin” on data and is not about manipulating the work and lying about it in order to achieve particular politically-relevant objectives.  Booth and all of the rest of his ilk should be rejected by the scientific community.

Population genetics papers – and certainly anything by Booth and colleagues – must be carefully scrutinized for signs of bias and for politically-motivated content. Of course, scientists have the right to privately engage in political activism (and I wish more would be on the Right instead of an almost unanimous slant to the Left). However, they need to be careful not to let political bias intrude into their research and contaminate the science. 

It is inevitable that some degree of unintentional bias will slip into research, particularly with respect to topics (like population genetics) that have sociopolitical implications. That is human nature, after all.  That is why readers always need to be alert to potential bias and need to read papers and scientific pronouncements with a skeptical eye. But what we see with the likes of Booth is much worse - it is the openly admitted intentional injection of politics and political bias into the work, which is then presented to the public as "science." That alone is unacceptable and dangerous, but it gets even worse - much worse - when the openly admitted goal is to obfuscate truth and mislead the public about the science for political objectives.

After all, it is objectively true that, in the majority of cases, ancient peoples from given territories are genetically more similar to extant indigenous populations in those same territories than they are to later, intrusive elements, such as more recent migrants. Indeed, there is often an ancestral relationship, to at least some degree, between the ancient peoples and the modern indigenous populations. This is uncontroversial and accepted, with no problem whatsoever, for Africa and Asia, and it is certainly also well-accepted for the Americas, where, often, today's Native Americans exercise legal control over access to ancient American remains, on the premise (accepted by all) that the ancient peoples were the ancestors of extant Native Americans. The only exception to the rule of accepting ancient-modern population links is, of course, Europe. The native, indigenous peoples of Europe are denied their basic human rights and their fundamental sense of identity, and have their deep connections to ancient Europeans obfuscated, for purely political reasons, with one stated rationale being "to protect marginalized populations."  It would seem to me that, given this unequal treatment, and this denial of basic human rights, it are the Europeans who are truly the marginalized populations. Indeed, denying the group identity of a people and denying their ancestral origins and their "blood and soil" ties, which are clearly demonstrated by both genetic and history analyses, is the first step toward genocide of that people.

In summary, the political activity of Booth and his ilk, being injected into the scientific discourse as it is, must be unalterably opposed.  When the likes of Booth spread their poison, please use this post (and whatever others like it that you may find) as an antidote to Boothite anti-White venom.

Counter-Covid

More retardation from Der Right.

Another right-wing lie. The influenza vaccine typically is not very highly effective, some years worse than others due to a poor match of vaccine to circulating strain, so it is perfectly rational to worry about being infected by someone regardless of vaccination status. The other vaccines mentioned are much more effective, but no vaccine I know of works 100% in 100% of people, which is why herd immunity is desirable. So, in totality, that Gab comment is, as usual, wrong and illogical.

Why does Der Right always have to be ignorant?

When will Der Movement stop lying?  They can't stop. The entire "movement" is based on lies.

The comments section  here proves once and for all that Der Movement is beyond saving. It is full of repulsive, ignorant Luddite lunatics who are easy prey for Russian and Chinese disinformation.

You know, Morgan, saying that the vaccine "causes the creation of new variants" is as logical from a public health perspective as saying that chemotherapy "causes the creation of resistant cancer cells." First of all, if you are so ignorant of basic evolutionary science that you cannot understand the difference between creation and selection, then you have no business commenting. Second, these decisions are not made in a vacuum. Yes, if you don't give the cancer patient chemotherapy, you won't select for resistant cells, but the patient will just die all the faster, and any hope of a cure or remission would not exist. Yes, we could not vaccinate and any selection of variants due to the vaccine (if such exists) would not occur. How many more people who have died then? More to the point, how do you know that even worse variants wouldn't emerge in the non-vaccine context?  See this.

Summary: John Morgan should (metaphorically) shut his filthy mouth.

I am also bemused by the hand-waving “explanation” that Israel has poisoned its precious Jews with the covid “killshot” because Jews are neurotic hypochondriacs in fear of covid. But if they are so neurotic and hypochondriac wouldn’t they be even more fearful of the deadly toxin killshot that, according to Der Right, is killing more people than is covid itself? I suppose that logic is not a strong point of Counter-Currents commentators.

I would have no problem with the anti-covid vaxxers if they would take responsibility for the consequences of their decision; for example, if they became seriously ill with covid, they should not utilize medical resources and should just stay home and either recover or die. But what I do strongly object to is their constant stream of lies and retarded misrepresentations about covid and the vaccine.

Hey Greg Johnson, for the sake of full disclosure:

1. Are you vaccinated against Covid-19?

2. Do you in general support the vaccine?

3. Do you think the vaccine is a "toxic killshot?"

4. Do you think that Israel is killing its population with the "killshot" because they are neurotic hypochondriacs?

I'll answer for myself:

1. Yes

2. Yes

3. No

4. No

That wasn't so hard. Now you do it, you despicable coward.

The good news is that Der Movement is so repulsive to Whites, including highly educated Nutzis like me, that it is highly unlikely that they will ever achieve their goals.

The bad news is that Der Movement is filling the activist niche space, preventing the flourishing of an rational alternative.

I renounce and denounce Der Movement totally and without reservation. Der Movement must be destroyed - one of my life's missions.

Der Movement must be mercilessly destroyed.

Odds and Ends, 11/30/21

In der news.

See this. That's a mixed bag. As usual for that site, it's short on prescription (and whatever prescription that occurs there is usually off base), but the description is at least half correct. Yes, the Alt Right is a disaster. A problem with that is that 20-20 hindsight is easy. When people like Liddell were part of the Alt Right - and featured in Arktos books on that subject - I was critiquing the Alt Right and predicting its downfall (starting in 2016 and definitely I was openly hostile by early 2017). Then we have the thesis that the West's problems are innate and should not be blamed on the Jews. Yes and no. On the one hand, Der Movement goes overboard on the Jew thing and needs to bin more blame on White foibles (with the High Trusters at the head of line). On the other hand, complex thinking understands that it is possible for both to be true - many of the West's problems are innate, but, at the same time, they are being enhanced and amplified by Jews as an influential minority with interests that conflict with the White majority. Blaming all on the Jews is foolish. It is equally foolish to dismiss the role played by Jews as a "sociopolitical/cultural enzyme" speeding up the rate of rot and decay.

Liddell states that Japan is starting to go down the road to multiracialism without a real Jewish presence, but it is astonishing that he doesn't admit that his own presence in that nation is contributing to the problem. Saying "it's a matter of numbers" doesn't excuse it, not only from the standpoint of hypocrisy, but from a psychological standpoint - the presence of White faces in Japan creates to the Japanese the idea that they are somewhat of a cosmopolitan society, and breaks down barriers to more significant numbers of immigrant

My riposte to those who label me as "insane" and "paranoid" because I keep on beating the drum about the White ethnic question - I gave Der Movement more than twenty years to exhibit some sort of significant progress on this issue, and, if anything, things have gotten worse, particularly after the rise of the Alt Right and HBD. 20+ years is long enough. Patience has its limits.

The pitiful ignorance of Hippocrates:

In the year 410 the German Visigoth Alaric and his army sacked Rome and destroyed the Roman Empire in the West.

No. The sack in 410 AD occurred, but the end of the Western Roman Empire was 476 AD:

In 476, the Germanic barbarian king Odoacer deposed the last emperor of the Western Roman Empire in Italy, Romulus Augustulus, and the Senate sent the imperial insignia to the Eastern Roman Emperor Flavius Zeno.

Wrong, wrong, Der Movement is always, ALWAYS wrong.

Four facts:

1. Israel has been aggressively vaccinating its own citizens against covid.

2. The System wants to prioritize Coloreds over Whites for the vaccination.

3. Jew doctors promote vaccine hesitancy among Gab/Trump supporters.

4. Trump himself pushed for the rapid development of the vaccine, wants it called a "Trumpcine," has been vaccinated, and told his followers to get vaccinated.

Based on all of that, Der Right - heavily composed of High Trusters - concludes that the vaccine is a toxin, part of a Globalist conspiracy to poison White Christians.

Thus, the last 100 or so years of American history becomes more easily explained. Jews taking America away from the High Trusters is like an adult taking candy away from a (retarded) baby.

See this - a perfect example of the smug, self-satisfied, arrogant, complete ignorance of the Luddite Right. Please explain to me the biological law that states that in all circumstances "mutations grow weaker" (I don't even know what "weaker" is even supposed to mean in this context). Mutation is random, and selection of mutation depends on the environmental context - there's no "law" that says that mutations always get "weaker"(or "stronger" whatever that means). And who is the "everyone" that "knows" this idiot's nonsense? Creationist Jaysus freaks who say ("everyone knows!") that the universe was created by Big Daddy Sky God (or the flying spaghetti monster, take your pick) 6000 years ago?

The new variant is being reported, Gab right-wing dumbfuck (I realize "dumbfuck" is superfluous after "Gab right-wing"), because it exists. Not everything is a conspiracy to satisfy the cravings of your fevered "brain."

Good luck building a viable rightist movement while alienating STEM professionals.

And don't listen to some dumb cunt, re: science. I usually don't like using such vulgar language in my work, but in this case it is justified.

Behold Der Movement: 

WN 1.0 = Sieg Heil and Pass the Beer White nationalism

WN 2.0 = Beavis-and-Butthead White nationalism

WN 3.0 = Rosie and the Kids White nationalism

Against HBD Filth, 10/1/21

Against HBD scum.

HBDers start whining when their own ethnies are targeted. Other folks though are fair game.

Med Europe (490/99) – based on Spain, Portugal, Italy results. In a way, one can see the Euro crisis – which is mostly affecting the PIGS – as the invisible hand’s way of bumping down the Med countries to a level more in line with their lower human capital (relative to the Germanic countries).

And this outrageous lie, not supported by genetic data:

Turks and Greeks genetically similar.

And of course.

HBDers weep.

Derbyshire weeps; the genetic facts.

Another surprise was that the engineered mice had less breast tissue, meaning that EDAR could be the reason that East Asian women have generally smaller breasts.

Well, if “generally” you mean that the typical East Asian woman has the body of pre-pubescent boy, then, yes.

East Asians are sometimes assumed to have evolved in a cold environment because of their narrow nostrils, which conserve heat, and the extra eyelid fat that insulates the eye. But the Broad team calculates that the EDAR variant arose about 35,000 years ago in central China and that the region was then quite warm and humid. Extra sweat glands would have been advantageous to the hunter-gatherers who lived at that time.

East Asians – a TROPICAL, global south people, with cheating and manipulation of their “PISA scores.”

The execrable HBD Nordicist site The Occidental Observer is using a Negro-Herrenvolk alliance to defame (Southern) Italians once again.

First of all TOO scum, these “IQ differences” do not exist with respect to currently available actual IQ data.

…our results demonstrate quite clearly that raw scores [on Raven's Coloured Progressive Matrices] of children from Sicily are not lower than those [of children from the North and Central-South] reported by Cornoldi et al. (2010). On the contrary, they are sometimes higher…Naglieri et al. (submitted for publication) studied the differences between the psychometric qualities of the CAS [Cognitive Assessment System] for the Italian and US standardization samples. Although the goal of that study was not to make regional comparisons, they did report that there were no significant differences (F(1, 806)=2.19, p=.11) between the average CAS-Italian Full Scale standard scores (set at a mean of 100 and standard deviation of 15) for students from the northern (M=100.5; SD=13.2), central (M=101.2; SD=11.9), and southern (M=103.1; SD=11.6) regions of Italy. The mean standard scores for the students in the north were only slightly lower than the mean for those in the south (effect size=.21). These results suggest that a test of intelligence that measures basic neuropsychological processes, and does not include academically laden verbal and quantitative tests, yields small differences between the regional groups. These findings also amplify the importance of measuring intelligence directly when comparing groups and argue against using reading, math and science test scores as "proxies for intelligence" (Lynn, 2010a).

Second of all, TOO filth, using E1b1b as some sort of quantitative measure of historic admixture from the Middle/Near East or North Africa (MENA) is absurd; those measures require autosomal data. Never mind that carriers of that NRY include: John C. Calhoun, the Wright brothers, Lyndon Johnson, Napoleon and Hitler, William Harvey, and David Attenborough – hardly Southern Italians. Were they all admixed with MENA?

To demonstrate Lynn’s lack of logic, consider the following. If one thinks that NRY such as E1b1b directly correlates with “admixture” then the peoples of the Balkans are, via Lynn’s “reasoning,” highly admixed with MENA people. But there is no evidence of this from autosomal data; in PCA, Balkanoids (as well as S. Italians, by the way) are found exactly where one would expect to find them with the “genes mirror geography” paradigm. These people are not being pulled toward MENA populations in any manner independent of normal genetic clines that track with geography. Further, there are no unsupervised admixture data that I am aware of that supports such MENA admixture.

Also, even if we take Lynn’s IQ “estimates” at face value, to ascribe the IQ differences (10 points or more) to MENA admixture would necessitate at least 50% MENA admixture or a MENA IQ of 60 or some strange non-linear dominant negative effects of “low IQ alleles.” There is absolutely no evidence for any of that; thus, the “math” doesn’t add up to ascribe alleged intra-European IQ differences to MENA admixture.

Lynn is a pseudoscientific fraud. He commits the most obvious flaw of pseudoscience – he starts out with his desired conclusion and then works backward with cherry picked and misinterpreted data, and bizarre conclusions, and therefore “justifies” his own hypotheses. That TOO publicizes this trash underscores what a trashy, pseudoscientific site it itself is. Lynn’s Italian IQ ideas fail the fact test, the data interpretation test, and the logic test.

See this about Chinese IQ. The Lynn fraud continues to be uncovered. Also see this.

This new white nationalism tried to put on a happy face, but unfortunately it had embraced a prejudice just as irrational and just as dangerous as the white leftist obsession with mass non-white immigration. By disassociating themselves from the more aggressive white racialists of the past, who typically subscribed to the view that whites occupied the highest plane of evolutionary development, it was believed that white nationalists would be able to pursue their own agenda in relative peace. Under the cloak of Asian supremacy, race-oriented differential psychologists would be able to further consolidate their research on negro intellectual inferiority without having to endure constant leftist taunts of “white supremacist!” or “Nazi!”

The shift from white intellectual superiority to Oriental intellectual superiority in the late 1970’s was a last-ditch effort at ideological and racial self-defense in the face of overwhelming odds. White nationalists, the ideological inheritors of the traditional conservative establishment, had their backs up against a wall. The primary white nationalist imperative was to ensure white racial survival. Placing East Asians at the top of the racial hierarchy, despite all of the earlier historical, biological, anthropological, craniometric and paleontological evidence that had been adduced in favor of white superiority, was supposed to allow them to pursue this primary directive without being molested by a leftist-controlled establishment determined to snuff out all dissenting opinion. East Asians were chosen for this role because they were, under the old racial hierarchy, almost as evolved as whites, unlike the other races who were viewed as closer to the more primitive Homo erectus or, in Darwin’s time, the gorilla. In continuing to make this choice, Richard Lynn fans are confronted with a dilemma: if East Asians are so superior, why bother focusing on preservation of the white race? Shouldn’t the best genes be allowed to survive and propagate? If this is the case, whites should make way for an East Asian world by diluting themselves out of existence through non-white immigration and miscegenation. Whatever its short-term goals, in the long run, advocacy of Oriental racial superiority is the logic of white genocide on a large scale.

Getting back to the anti-White HBD Nordicist trash site The Occidental Observer, note how they work with Negroes to leverage the "work" of China-worshipping pseudoscientists to racially defame non-Herrenvolk European ethnies. As the quote above suggests, Amren/Taylor as well as TOO/MacDonald are race traitors supporting "the logic of white genocide on a large scale."

This is surprisingly sensible. It goes against Traditionalist Golden Age nonsense, as well as Guntherite Nordicism. Practically speaking, we need racial separation, genetic isolation, combined with judicious eugenics. Over time, there will be more racial divergence; hence, purity.

Ad Hoc Hypothesis

Relevant to Der Movement.

See this about the concept of ad hoc hypothesis – the idea that people try and protect their hypotheses and theories from falsification by adding more and more extra hypotheses to the original hypothesis and theory. So, for example, as the Wikipedia entry suggests, the theory that “leprechauns are real” becomes falsified by the lack of any evidence of their existence, so one adds to the original theory that the leprechauns are “invisible” and/or have “complex motives” that mean that they hide themselves, etc. Thus:

In science and philosophy, an ad hoc hypothesis is a hypothesis added to a theory in order to save it from being falsified. Often, ad hoc hypothesizing is employed to compensate for anomalies not anticipated by the theory in its unmodified form.

Scientists are often skeptical of theories that rely on frequent, unsupported adjustments to sustain them. This is because, if a theorist so chooses, there is no limit to the number of ad hoc hypotheses that they could add. Thus the theory becomes more and more complex, but is never falsified. This is often at a cost to the theory's predictive power, however. Ad hoc hypotheses are often characteristic of pseudoscientific subjects.

Of course, sometimes modification of hypotheses is necessary and so ad hoc approaches are not always wrong, but typically speaking, the ad hoc approach is flawed. When ad hoc approaches are used to “re-adjust” a theory, a hypothesis, that has been falsified, specifically to save it from that falsification, and even more so, when the ad hoc hypotheses violate Occam’s razor by continuously adding superfluous complexity compared to more parsimonious alternative theories that have not been falsified and have more predictive power, then we observe inappropriate ad hoc hypotheses.

For example, the HBD Nordicists claim as part of their theory, their hypothesis, the importance of intra-European differences in individualism vs. collectivism, with groups descended from (altruistic) northern hunter-gatherers, exemplified by Scandinavians, being extremely individualistic, particularly compared to those selfish collectivist swarthoids and other non-Nordic groups.

This is falsified by data such as this. See the Y axis, which describes group individualism vs. collectivism. On the one hand, Sweden and Denmark are more individualistic than, say, Spain, Russia, or Poland (but Russians and Poles have a lot of “northern hunter gatherer” ancestry, so their collectivism is itself a partial refutation of HBD Nordicism). However, Swedes and Danes are no more individualistic than are Italians or French, and less so than Hungarians. Germanic Germans and Austrians, as well as Northern European Estonians and Finns, are more collectivist than Italians, French, and Hungarians. Most individualistic are countries of the Anglosphere, which seems a particular characteristic of British-derived cultures; these nations are significantly more individualistic than Scandinavians. Then there is the known Law of Jante extreme collectivist conformity of Scandinavian culture, which also falsifies the HBD-Nordicist theory.  

How do the HBD Nordicists then do the “leprechaun trick” to save their pseudoscientific theory?  The HBD Nordicists engage in spin, invoking ad hoc hypotheses, to state (and I kid you not) that Scandinavians are collectivist conformists precisely because they are so individualistic! Thus, you see, they are so ultra-individualistic that they exhibit extreme egalitarianism, which needs to be enforced by collectivist social norms via rigidly conformist behavior.

However, this is a tacit admission that Scandinavians are indeed somewhat collectivist (regardless of the reason), which is sufficient to falsify the original hypothesis. Thus, all of the hand-waving spin is nothing else but ad hoc hypotheses added on to avoid acceptance of that falsification.

There are alternative theories to explain intra-European differences in behavior, such as mine that NW Europeans underwent ethnogenesis in an environment in which their enemies, those they engaged in conflict with, were other Europeans (given the greater geographic distance of NW Europe from Africa-Asia), while in Southern and Eastern Europe, conflict with Afro-Asiatic non-Europeans was an important part of ethnogenesis. Thus, NW Europeans evolved a “narcissism of small differences” ethnocentrism toward those relatively similar to themselves but somewhat different; however, they are indifferent to, or welcoming to, truly alien peoples. Other Europeans, those from the South and East, have a much stronger negative reaction to racially alien non-Europeans than they do to other Europeans (other Europeans that they did have conflicts with as well, but the difference is the presence of constant conflict with the more racially alien others).  Now, this theory may be wrong, but I am not going to engage in ad hoc nonsense to save it, and, as it currently stands, it is more parsimonious than “Scandinavians are collectivist because they are so individualistic” HBD Nordicist nonsense.

Other methods of avoiding acceptance of the falsification of hypotheses include ignorance or revision. This is often used by Der Movement when population genetics analysis of old/ancient DNA falsifies Nordicist hypotheses about racial history. One can simply ignore the data (“Arthur Kemp was right” when in fact he has been discredited) or revise the original hypothesis – “The original Romans of the Republic were Nordic” mysteriously is forgotten and is replaced by “The population of Rome changed over time” (an unremarkable supposition for the cosmopolitan capital of a massive Empire, and a finding that logically suggests nothing definitive about widespread, panmictic admixture between groups in that city, much less Italy or the Empire as a whole). I suppose that nitpicking modification is also a form of revisionism – “The Ancient Greeks were Nordic” is suitably modified to “We are not talking about the Minoan or Mycenaean civilizations, nor even later Ionians but about Dorians” – the mind boggles.

Der Movement is intellectually bankrupt, a statement that requires no ad hoc hypotheses for its defense.

Real Race Realism

Considerations.

Compared to the politicized pseudoscience of HBD, we can consider real race realism, a true, genuine, authentic consideration of racial differences. According to HBD, East Asians, like the Chinese, are high-IQ supermen, and are beyond criticism. According to real race realism, the Chinese (and extension, other East Asians) are inept colored tropical people, whose nation is a festering cesspool of disease, who are an uncreative hive of human photocopiers, copying and stealing the fruits of other people's intellectual and technical work, and who are responsible for creating one pandemic after another, the latest being covid-19.

A sound understanding of real race realism would have better informed American scientists and scientific administrators. Thus, when a decision needed to be made regarding whether or not to fund gain-of-function virus research in China, the  real race realist reaction would have been:

Definitely not! The Chinese are a corrupt, incompetent, tropical, global south, colored people, with a documented history of barbaric behavior, including politically-motivated voluntary cannibalism, they are a singularly uncreative race who steal and copy the fruits of the White man's genuine creativity, they are bereft of any authentic higher striving, they mass produce shoddy, low quality, sometimes lead-infested and poisonous, junk that they dump onto other economies, they regularly produce deadly pandemics through their filth and destructive lack of self-awareness, they are untrustworthy, they cheat, they cut corners, they lie, and they would use whatever research they do against our interests. Their incompetence, corruption, and untrustworthiness makes any such research in their hands dangerous to all humanity, the potential for a lab leak (or an intentional release) is very real, and we can't take the chance. We may not be able to stop them from doing such research on their own, but we certainly should not be enabling it, and we must not fund it. It would be less risky to fund gain-of-function Ebola research in Nigeria than it would be to fund any type of viral research in China. The answer is and must reman a resounding no.

That's what a real race realism would tell us. In contrast, multiculturalist naivete helped produce covid-19, and "drop your pants and bend over" HBD gives us absolute filth who do the dirty work of the Chinese government to help cover up the real origins of that disease.

HBD would tell us that having the Chinese supermen doing gain-of-function virus research is a good thing - imagine the amazing discoveries The Holy Orientals will make compared to stupid Whites!  Real race realism, on the other hand, would tell you that having the Chinese doing that research would be just as bad, or worse, than having sub-Saharan Africans do it, with potential pandemics an ever-present possibility. Guess which of those two perspectives better reflects reality.

Sallis Right Again: Political Population Genetics

And other news.

Another example of the politicization of science:

Isolation-by-distance models are part of the institutional creed of antiracialism used to critique claims of biological race concepts (BRCs). Proponents of antiracialism appeal to isolation-by-distance models to describe patterns of human genetic differences among and between groups as a function of distance. Isolation by distance has been referred to as the pattern that human genetic variation fits, distributing the differences we see as race throughout geographic space as a series of Gaussian gradients. Contemporary scientific critiques of BRCs fuse social constructionist race concepts with a description of the distribution of proportions of human genetic variation in geographic space as a function of distance. These two points are often followed by statements noting that there is only one human race... To address the shortcomings in the scientific critique of race, the author proposes combining Du Boisian demography with Darwinian evolutionary biology. From a Du Boisian demographic perspective, race is a product of racism, or race/ism, and is a heredity and inheritance system based on rules of partus sequitur ventrem and hypodescent. Race marks individuals and groups them to reproduce unequal relationships into which Europeans co-opted them. This synthesis propounds a new racial formation theory to understand the more general consequences of racism on genes and health outcomes.

This is an admission that much of modern population genetics, and pseudoscientific denials of racial reality, is based on “the institutional creed of antiracialism,” and not on genuine scientific empiricism.

...the differences we see as race throughout geographic space as a series of Gaussian gradients. Contemporary scientific critiques of BRCs fuse social constructionist race concepts with a description of the distribution of proportions of human genetic variation in geographic space as a function of distance.

Ignoring clustering and ignoring the ability of definitively assign race based on genetic data or on forensic anthropology.

To address the shortcomings in the scientific critique of race, the author proposes combining Du Boisian demography with Darwinian evolutionary biology.

"Du Boisian demography?" Do you need any more evidence that the “scientific” establishment has been completely co-opted by SJW lunacy and by Colored radicalism?

Everything I’ve ever written about the political objectives of population genetics is verified. And, by the way, do you think that “testing companies,” with their known biases and leaked admission of “owning racists” by fudging results, are immune to this politicization?

The pseudoscience of the Left mirrors that of the Right (e.g., HBD) - they start out with the desired conclusion and then work backward to try and justify it.

Should there be treason trials for selected HBDers?  Is there any way of connecting their activity to aiding China levying war against the United States?

The HBDers need to “pay” as well.

Considering all of the prominent HBDers, isn't it interesting that there is a correlation between promoting HBD and having one or more of the following characteristics:

1. Being critical and/or opposed to White nationalism

2. Consumed with hostility toward pan-Europeanism

3. Being of non-European ancestry and/or married to someone of non-European ancestry

4. Promoting one or more of the following: miscegenation, aracial citizenism, cognitive elitist IQ nationalism, pseudoscience

5. Open disdain for White ethnics, typically combined with worship of Jews and East Asians

6. Innate hostility for any memes that unite Europeans and innate tropism toward any memes that divide Europeans

7. Being "socially awkward" or some other type of mattoid, including defending child porn

Related material.

Read this, and remember that the Quota Queens deny that the affirmative action program exists.

I’m surprised that we have not yet heard from Der Movement that all of the UFOs in the news are actually Nazi flying saucers from Antarctica. 

What hypocrisy.  In Hungary, no less.  Remember this:

Author Marisa Abrajano, whose origins we can only imagine from her name and appearance, teaches political science at UC San Diego. Zoltan Hajnal also teaches at UC San Diego. Zoltan is a Hungarian name, so it’s unlikely his ancestors came over on the Mayflower. White Backlash is published by Princeton University Press.

This is the perfect symbol for our degenerate times. Foreigners tell the American founding stock how benighted and deserving of oblivion we are, and are published by one of the country’s most prestigious academic presses. We have work to do.

Maybe Hungarians should not have foreigners in their nation preaching to them about “European Brotherhood” while in reality opposing that “brotherhood” in their own nations.

A telling admission from the new Counter-Currents:

Nick JeelvyMay 31, 2021 at 2:30 pm

I must admit I had no idea what the point of this article was while I was writing it…

And that’s an article behind their paywall!  You just can’t make this stuff up.

It’s the 1918 Flu, Bro!

Lies about the 1918 Flu. Emphasis added.

I have long been exposing the pro-Chinese shilling in Der Movement, particularly the HBD race realist and Silk Road factions, the tendency to absolve the Chinese of any blame for anything, and the pathetic “Jew-baiting” technique to attack critics of the Chinese.

Let’s take the possible Chinese role in the 1918 “Spanish” flu. The lickspittle pro-Chinese shills over at Unz doing their thing:

There is one other aspect to this that requires mention: the attempt by some individuals to lay the blame for this event on China. The accusation itself is too stupid to warrant refuting…

Sure, I mean why actually argue against evidence?  The continued generation of disease in China, endlessly confirmed by historical and epidemiological studies, is too stupid to warrant refuting.  Is that Chinatrix strap-on a snug fit?  Just joking of course…

There is so much effort today to attribute the ‘Spanish flu’ to the Chinese – by Jewish historians – as there also is to attribute Europe’s Bubonic Plague to the Chinese – by the same Jewish historians. This really needs to end, and the best method is to name and identify all those responsible. Perhaps the time has finally arrived for the world to know the truth of a great many things.

Jewish historians!  Jews, Jews, everywhere! The pro-Chinese faction always tries to appeal to the knee-jerk anti-Semitism of the Far Right by attributing every criticism of the Chinese to Jews (never mind the traditionally warm feelings between Jews and Chinese, good Israeli-Chinese relations, and talk of a “pivot” of international Jewry towards Asia and pro-Asian attitudes).

Laughably, the filthy Chinese still have bubonic plague today, but to talk about that, or identify that the disease originated in China, means that you are a Jew. Jew historians!  Note the Chinese names among the scientists involved in tracking down the origin of the bubonic plague to China. I suppose that they are all...Chinese Jews! Jews, Jews everywhere....eating their gelfite fish with chopsticks, along with their kosher eggrolls!

Can you believe the transparent obviousness of the Unzians? Every time someone says something they don't like, they cry "Jew!"  Of course, if they'd point at Unz himself and cry "Jew!," then in that instance they'd be accurate.

The labeling of all critics of China as "Jews" is absurd ad hominem. So, EGI Notes exposes the Chinese role in infecting humanity throughout the centuries, thus, I’m a Jew (or “suck Jewish cock” according to Daniel S. of Majority Rights). Madness.

Let’s return the favor:

He has been a visiting professor at Shanghai’s Fudan University, presenting case studies in international affairs to senior EMBA classes. Mr. Romanoff lives in Shanghai…

So, Canadian historian Humphries is a "Jew," and Sallis (long labeled a “virulent anti-Semite” and someone who met Pierce to talk about ideas and strategy) is a "Jew," but “Romanoff” is definitely not a Jew. The fact that this turd “lives in Shanghai” also has absolutely nothing to do with the nonsense he’s peddling – it’s a coincidence, a coincidence I say!  He’s stationed in China and spreading nonsense that covid-19 initiated in America, and now the 1918 flu was another American conspiracy, but, hey, he could be living anywhere. 

So, according to this Unzian retard, who just happens to be living in China, what was the 1918 flu?

...In fact, it is now stated that the reason modern medical technology was never able to identify the “killer influenza strain” from this pandemic was because influenza was not the killer. It might be obvious to us today because we know that influenza attacks the young, old and immunocompromised, while the “Spanish Flu” attacked healthy people in their prime – which is what a bacterial pneumonia does.

Again, the official narrative tells us that, due to troop movements because of the war, the pathogen was spread worldwide. But the current emerging thesis is that troop movements might have been irrelevant because Rockefeller, in their combined haste and hubris, “sent their experimental anti-meningococcal serum to England, France, Belgium, Italy and many other countries, helping spread the epidemic worldwide...

Those damn Jew doctors jabbing people with their toxic serum!  Sodomizing folks with their anti-meningococcal needles!

As regards modern medical technology was never able to identify the “killer influenza strain” from this pandemic – it takes maybe less than 15 seconds of googling to find such items as:

See this.

In the article, Taubenberger and his team described their initial work to sequence part of the genome of the 1918 virus. The genome is the complete list of genetic instructions that make up an organism, similar to a blueprint used for construction. Many people are familiar with the concept of DNA, which is dual-stranded and determines the fundamental genetic characteristics of nearly all living things. However, the genome of an influenza virus consists of single-stranded RNA instead. Taubenberger’s team team successfully extracted RNA of the 1918 virus from lung tissue obtained from a 21-year-old male U.S. service member stationed in Fort Jackson, South Carolina. The serviceman had been admitted to the camp’s hospital on September 20, 1918, with a diagnosis of influenza infection and pneumonia. He died six days later on September 26, 1918, and a sample of his lung tissue was collected and preserved for later study.

More on this.

The “Spanish” influenza pandemic of 1918–19 caused acute illness in 25–30 percent of the world’s population and resulted in the death of up to an estimated 40 million people. Using fixed and frozen lung tissue of 1918 influenza victims, the complete genomic sequence of the 1918 influenza virus has been deduced. Sequence and phylogenetic analysis of the completed 1918 influenza virus genes shows them to be the most avian-like among the mammalian-adapted viruses. This finding supports the hypotheses that (1) the pandemic virus contains genes derived from avian-like influenza virus strains and that (2) the 1918 virus is the common ancestor of human and classical swine H1N1 influenza viruses. The relationship of the 1918 virus with avian influenza viruses is further supported by recent work in which the 1918 hemagglutinin (HA) protein crystal structure was resolved. Neither the 1918 hemagglutinin (HA) nor the neuraminidase (NA) genes possess mutations known to increase tissue tropicity that account for the virulence of other influenza virus strains like A/WSN/33 or the highly pathogenic avian influenza H5 or H7 viruses. Using reverse genetics approaches, influenza virus constructs containing the 1918 HA and NA on a modern human influenza virus background were lethal in mice. The complete 1918 virus was even more virulent in mice. The genotypic basis of this virulence has not yet been elucidated. The complete sequence of the non-structural (NS) gene segment of the 1918 virus was deduced and also tested for the hypothesis that enhanced virulence in 1918 could have been due to type I interferon inhibition by the NS1 protein. Results from these experiments suggest that in human cells the 1918 NS1 is a very effective interferon antagonist, but the 1918 NS1 gene does not have the amino acid change that correlates with virulence in the H5N1 virus strains identified in 1997 in Hong Kong. Sequence analysis of the 1918 pandemic influenza virus is allowing us to test hypotheses as to the origin and virulence of this strain. This information should help elucidate how pandemic influenza virus strains emerge and what genetic features contribute to virulence in humans.

And this.

The influenza A virus pandemic of 1918–1919 resulted in an estimated 20–40 million deaths worldwide. The hemagglutinin and neuraminidase sequences of the 1918 virus were previously determined. We here report the sequence of the A/Brevig Mission/1/18 (H1N1) virus nonstructural (NS) segment encoding two proteins, NS1 and nuclear export protein. Phylogenetically, these genes appear to be close to the common ancestor of subsequent human and classical swine strain NS genes. Recently, the influenza A virus NS1 protein was shown to be a type I IFN antagonist that plays an important role in viral pathogenesis. By using the recently developed technique of generating influenza A viruses entirely from cloned cDNAs, the hypothesis that the 1918 virus NS1 gene played a role in virulence was tested in a mouse model. In a BSL3+ laboratory, viruses were generated that possessed either the 1918 NS1 gene alone or the entire 1918 NS segment in a background of influenza A/WSN/33 (H1N1), a mouse-adapted virus derived from a human influenza strain first isolated in 1933. These 1918 NS viruses replicated well in tissue culture but were attenuated in mice as compared with the isogenic control viruses. This attenuation in mice may be related to the human origin of the 1918 NS1 gene. These results suggest that interaction of the NS1 protein with host-cell factors plays a significant role in viral pathogenesis.

Scientists reconstructing the 1918 virus.

There’s more of course, much more, but I’ll leave that as an exercise to the reader to find. Do you still believe that modern medical technology was never able to identify the “killer influenza strain” from this pandemic?

But all of those studies and all of that data are obviously – obviously, I say! – part of the Rockefeller-America-Jew conspiracy! Jew scientists! The DNA sequencing machines are Jewish!  Every vial of chain-terminating ddNTPs has a little yarmulke cap on it!  Jews, Jews, everywhere!

Oh well. We don’t want to offend Ms. Wei Fuk Yu now, do we?  Anyone who doesn’t bend over and spread their ass cheeks to the Chinese is, of course, a “Jew” or a “Jew historian” or is busy “sucking Jewish cock.”

Ask yourself why the pro-Chinese shills of HBD and of Silk Road White nationalism are ever-so-eager to lie to you. Ask yourself whether every virologist and epidemiologist who recognize that the 1918 pandemic was a flu, regardless of where they think it originated, is lying to you or whether this is just more anti-scientific crap spewing forth from the stinking orifice of the Unz site.

Questions to ask indeed!

There is some controversy as to where the 1918 Flu Pandemic started. Some say the USA. Others like Humphries say China. I agree with the latter, given China’s long history as a festering petri dish of disease, where the overcrowded and filthy conditions are prime breeding grounds for every type of microbe imaginable, following by the inevitable cross-species jump from Chinese to humans. 

But, regardless of where it originated, no serious academic, no virologist, no epidemiologist, no scientist, no one, is arguing against the long-standing and voluminous evidence that we are dealing here with a natural influenza.  

Crazed conspiracy theories delegitimize the Right and make sane and rational people question anything and everything the Right says, even that bulk of which that is true. Is this a reason for spreading ludicrous conspiracy theories to begin with? Further, STEM people, unfortunately already enriched on the Left, will be driven further from the Right the more that the Right engages in pseudoscientific fantasies to push conspiracy theories. Those are all good reasons for me to speak out, again and again, against Der Right's paranoid ideation, particularly when it directly or indirectly involves science.

I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again – the real conspiracies are, for the most part, those open, right in your face. Want to consider a potential conspiracy? Why are there so many, ostensibly on the Right, who are slavish pro-Chinese shills, and who parrot Chinese government propaganda, and who sugar-coat this nonsense to the Right with superficial anti-Semitism, labeling every critic of the Chinese, and/or every critic of their theories, as a “Jew” or a “sycophant of Jews” (that Unz himself is a Jew, and that so many of these stories are being promoted by Unz, escapes many of these people and their readers, who are not very big on self-awareness or on recognition of reality)?

Some vulgar but in my opinion accurate statements:

Ron Unz is a piece of shit.

Anyone who writes for Unz is a piece of shit.

Anyone who agrees to have their outside work reproduced on the Unz site is a piece of shit.

Anyone who accepts money from Unz is a piece of shit.

Grifters and Retards, 3/8/21

In der news. In all cases, emphasis added.

“Movement” lies.

Reality facts.

More reality facts.

We have learned that not only had he recently been diagnosed with COVID-19, he also had underlying health issues, and had been exhibiting symptoms of illness at the time the vaccine was administered. Clinical examination and lab results have determined the COVID-19 vaccine has been ruled out as a contributing factor in the individual's death."

The CDC estimated out of a million people, allergic reactions happened in roughly five, a number within range of what has been reported with other vaccines for the flu, meningitis and shingles.

A recent CDC report found that of the 113 death reports to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System between Dec. 14 and Jan. 13 — a time period which saw 13.8 million doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna vaccines administered — no causal link between vaccination and death was found.

So, I’ll say that there is a much greater health risk for a “movement” "activist” getting strap-on-sodomized by a Chinatrix than there is for a sane person getting the covid-19 mRNA vaccine.

Further, I’m not sure that folks who have – literally – a retard fetish are the best sources for understanding this issue. Ad hominem?  Yes, it is, but nevertheless, why would anyone listen to these people?

…One of Gariepy's oddest aspects is his interest in mentally retarded women with the mental age of children. In fact he makes this a central feature of many of his live shows as he knows this drives traffic to his show. His relationships with these women—there have been at least two—effectively makes him a "virtual child rapist," as these women are incapable of adult consent.

See here for the origin of some of the outrageous lies and scientifically ignorant distortion that the Luddite Retards of Der Right use for their anti-vaxx campaigns.

I’m trying to grasp the underlying motive for Der Right. Just a knee-jerk rejection of anything the System does, even if it is right?  Ignorance?  Rejection of science and technics – after all, there weren’t any vaccines in Tolkien’s hobbit holes and hobbit shires, so, gudummint, we can’t have any here?

I’m also trying to understand what it is they think we should be doing. They oppose lockdowns. They oppose masking. They oppose the vaccines. They oppose virtually any and all measures against covid-19. I suppose they’ll just tell us it’s “just a cold.”  It’s a “DC swamp conspiracy!” So, why are all the Jews of Israel being vaccinated? Why is Putin’s Russia producing their own vaccine and vaccinating their people? What? Are all those foreign vaccinations actually “placebos” – part of the vast conspiracy?

Isn’t it interesting that the same folks that literally worship Trump as The God Emperor think that the vaccines that the Trump administration pushed through at “warp speed,” and for which their lipid-enhanced demigod is eager to take credit for, are “toxic jabs” meant to kill you and/or microchip you and//or alter your genes with a “mRNA operating system?” Trump as part of the Gatesian-Faucian deep state? Say it ain’t so, Don!

Der Right is intellectually, morally, and ethically bankrupt.  It’s full of grifters and paranoid retards.  Then they turn around and call ME “insane” and paranoid.”  Laughter time!

Well, there you have it, straight out of the horse’s mouth (or ass) – the endgame for Der Movement shown at the top. The “White ethnostate” – Dark Ages level of science, technics, medicine, and  political development. But, hey, you’ll be real snug in your hobbit hole, and when you die of an easily preventable disease, your hobbit hole can double as a ready-made instant coffin. Dual use!

On "The International Day of the Woman," we see that the combination of advancing age and progressive decrepitude does not dissuade milady from demonstrating the true and full extent of her talents! After all, we cannot in good conscience dismiss the contributions made to human progress from half the population now, can we?

Carnivore Jef Costello cries over his beefsteaks. Come on now. Those findings are obviously - obviously! - a deep state plot to "jab" your GI tract with toxic fruits and vegetables, a "chlorophyll operating system!"

Odds and Ends, 12/27/20

In der news.  In all cases, emphasis added.

Note the reference to Mike Rienzi.  Ted Sallis interview of Mike Rienzi here.  That's mocking of Der Movement, for the Type I retardates who can't figure that out for themselves.

Interesting comment:

attilathehen says:

December 2, 2017 

@geokat62

Thank you!!! This proves everything that I’ve been saying. This also reveals what VDare is really about. Derbyshire has been writing with a forked pen for years and very few people call him out on this. This is because Jews have high intermarriage rates with blacks/Asians. And VDare has a lot of semitophiles in its organization. The idea that a white man can write about saving the West when his Chinese wife and daughter voted for Obama reveals the degeneracy of this man…

I agree wholeheartedly.

An example of the affirmative action Johnson denies exists. I understand the animus against the GOP, and I have expressed the same, as part of the Sallis Strategy, among other things, but every situation needs to be judged on its own merits.  After four years of “all bark and no bite” Trump and the Alt Right, the Left is out for blood, and it is height of foolishness to empower the Left at this time, particularly since Der Movement is so inept and helpless that it is in no position to resist further persecution. True enough, Republican senators will support similar persecution (to some extent), and yes, the GOP needs to be punished for its habit of taking White voters for granted. But how is the GOP going to get that message by Whites voting for the Far Left?  Wouldn’t the message in that case be that the GOP failed for being insufficiently anti-White? If Whites didn’t vote, and it was made clear that the reason was the GOP’s betrayal of White interests, then that would be one thing. If, in a general election (not a run-off), a pro-White third party siphoned off White votes from the GOP, that would be even better. But, in this situation, in the current circumstances, what kind of idiot would endorse the Far Left?

Move affirmative action here.  One of the major themes of the discussion is Taylor’s naiveté, which he himself admits and his friend Dickson repeatedly points out, and that is on full display in that podcast. Compare Dickson’s and Taylor’s views in this discussion. Taylor's naiveté is an issue that has been brought up in many forums, it is something that has been going on for years. The same problem, the same issue, occurs again and again, with no change. Well, why change?  If there are no consequences for error in Der Movement, then there is no incentive to change; there is no selective pressure for adaption. That’s a perfect example of affirmative action and nothing Johnson says, none of his childish insults, can change the facts.

But, hey, keep on supporting these folks, all you rank-and-file out there, and when you keep on losing, time and again, you’ll scratch your heads and wonder why.  You are just as naïve as Taylor is, in your own way.

According to Dickson, only “insiders” can criticize an entity – only Southerners can criticize Southerners, and others cannot do so.  Interesting.  Does that apply to other groups as well?

I agree with Dickson with respect to his cynicism, skepticism, and hostility to the System. However, does Dickson ever wonder how the Left has taken over the entire System, despite the decades-long activism of people such as himself? Does Dickson ever wonder if his “movement” is a complete and utter failure?  

Jim Goad’s favorite movie scene is undoubtedly from 9:40-11:00 here.

Goad:

We also left behind the fat black lady from across the street…

Rewritten to be more succinct:

We also left behind the black lady from across the street…

The adjective “fat” is an unnecessary and superfluous descriptor for “black lady” – the term “black lady” in and of itself already includes the assumption of “fat.”

Strom and the National Alliance are disgracefully promoting Luddite anti-vaxx pseudoscientific nonsense.  In other words, because some folks are embittered that their children have autism and because they need to blame "someone else," that means that Whites need to be afflicted with, and suffer morbidity and mortality from, easily preventable diseases.  While I don't like to be the one to introduce personal matters into these debates, Strom did it himself by mentioning his son. Therefore, I would suggest he watch that "Revilo Oliver memorial tape" produced by the National Alliance in the mid-90s for a possible clue other than "toxic vaccines pushed by Jews and Big Pharma" for the problem in question. Every single person who I know who watched that tape noticed the same thing I did.

Der Right is an intellectual, moral, and spiritual embarrassment. Der Right is never going to attract the sort of intelligent STEM people it needs since it is rife with crackpot nuttiness. 

Der Movement and Der Right must be unalterably opposed by all thoughtful racialists – their vision of a “White ethnostate” would be of a “bring out your dead" 14th century Black Death-ridden pestilential hellhole. Meanwhile, as the Chinese reach for the stars, Whites will be firing up rusty old iron lungs for the newest generation of polio victims.

Question: When Pasteur inoculated  Meister - was that a conspiracy of "Jew doctors?"  

Between the Sallis Groupuscule and Der Movement is a gulf almost as wide as that between each of those entities and the System/Left.

Odds and Ends, 5/23/20

In der news.  In all cases, emphasis added.

The elegant John Simon unfortunately passed away last fall.  Simon, of Hungarian descent, seems to have been a good man:

In 1981, an ad in a Hollywood trade appeared accusing Simon of being "racist, anti-Semitic, misogynist, vicious and derisive." It was signed by 300 artists, apparently upset that Simon's review of Richard III complained that an actress in the show "should never be cast as anything but an itinerant gefilte fish with a nervous condition."

Well, as we know, obesity is related to higher covid-19 risk.

Meet Ron Unz.

Born in California, to a Ukrainian-Jewish immigrant, Unz was raised in a Yiddish-speaking household. His mother, Esther-Laio Avrutin, met his father on an airplane heading for Israel. A professor from the Midwest, he later briefly became her lover when visiting her on a few occasions in Los Angeles. She unilaterally decided to have a child with him, but Unz's father was already married and his wife opened a letter from Avrutin telling him about her pregnancy. She was an anti-war activist, who raised her son as a single mother, but Unz was given his father's surname and soon moved back to her family's home after her son's birth.

What about the dangers of cheap Chinese labor?

Due to the Chinese state confiscating supply chains and ethnic Chinese shipping masks in the West back to the homeland, there were so few disposable masks, especially highly effective N95 respirators, available for purchase by Americans that hospitals were having terrible difficulty sourcing personal protective equipment. Perhaps some authority figures understood the reality and thus intentionally misled the American public to preserve crucial facemasks for healthcare workers.

Of interest.

Over the years, Johnson and Spencer have sparred. A lot of the conflict, according to alt-righters, had to do with personal style. (Spencer became the best-known face of the “frat” style, polo-and-chinos alt-right; Johnson has dispensed with such pretenses.) But the tension between them also underscored an ongoing debate about how best to save America from itself. Johnson was seen as the Socrates of the radical right. He has a Ph.D. in philosophy and, before publicly embracing the cause of the white ethnostate, taught at Morehouse College, which is historically black. In Johnson’s view, the far right had to win the war of ideas before it could move on to the “real world” battlefield. That meant books and articles, speaking engagements, conferences, symposia. He had a way of explaining things that made racism and Jew hatred sound like post-structuralism or supply-side economics—something that was once new or avant-garde or even suspect and, over time, acquired a large following.

Spencer was more of a would-be Vladimir Lenin. He also took ideas seriously; he had pursued a Ph.D. at Duke, in intellectual history, before dropping out and moving to D.C. But he was mostly uninterested in ideas divorced from action. He wanted to be in the middle of things. He had pondered a congressional campaign in Montana, where he usually lived. He felt let down by Trump. (“His administration,” Spencer said in an interview, “is not fundamentally different than a [Mitt] Romney administration—or even a Hillary [Clinton] administration. I never expected him to be me. But I expected him to do something.”) The feeling on the alt-right was that Charlottesville had been a disaster because it had left so many members demoralized and fragmented the movement. For Spencer, political outcomes mattered.

Some interesting Twitter comments:

Highbrow Gentleman

@Hibrowgent

@NewRightAmerica

 and 

@ReadLinkola

So disappointing Greg. Stop being so petty.

Aureum

@Aureum_Kolovrat

@NewRightAmerica

 and 

@ReadLinkola

Promoting a #DuggAnon style psyop propaganda from a source with no name is very low ball. 

Please do better. Greg if you disagree with someone then it would be most honorable to debate them instead of smear them with trash like this that sends our spergs down the rabbit hole.

Aureum, you had better watch out, before you’re called “insane” and “indecent.” Debate?  He don't need no stinkin' debate!

Well, I’m not optimistic either, for two reasons:

First, the only possible vehicle for complete redemption – racial activism – has been compromised by the incompetent Quota Queen “leadership” and their rank-and-file Nutzi followers, coupled to an inane and “insane” fossilized dogma.

Second, the dominant element among Europeans today is the “high trust northern hunter gatherers.”  While there are – contra the HBD liars – strong elements of pathological altruism in Southern and Eastern Europe, I’ll agree with the HBDers that it is strongest in NW Europe. Having the SJW Herrenvolk captaining the HMS Europa is leading to a bigger disaster than the Titanic.

I was very supportive of Trump during the 2016 election.

Indeed. And, at the same time I was referring to Trump as a “vulgar ignorant buffoon” who I endorsed solely because of the chaos he would bring in his wake (which he did).  Who was right? Who was wrong?

I agree, Greg (except for the invention part, see below). The problem is that some of the people you’ve feuded with can say the same about you.

The "invention" accusation is, unfortunately, a new low in "New Right" discourse.  It’s not enough for Johnson to call his critics “insane” and “indecent” - here he implies that some of them may have been “invented by the enemy.” Criticize him and you are - what?  A CIA asset?  A SPLC or ADL agent? A HopeNotHate operative (no, wait, that’s Hermansson)? A reporter for The Stranger (no, wait, that’s Lewis)?  

You see, disagreeing with someone, criticizing their behavior and ideology and actions, holding them accountable – that makes you a “horrible” person. Or an “invention of the enemy.” 

These types, who have an inflated sense of their own self-importance, have to personalize everything. As I’ve repeatedly written here – my criticism of people in the “movement” is business, not personal. I do not know them personally nor do I care to. Who knows? They may be kind to animals (except whales), generous to strangers, pleasant enough in private interactions, real salt of the Earth.  But if these people – particularly self-styled “leaders” – are in my opinion destructive to the cause, I’m going to call them out on it.  It’s “punching right” – which Johnson approves of (at least when he does it to others).  If the behavior is, in my opinion, hypocritical, mendacious, defamatory, etc., then the criticism will be harsh.  But, also, the thing is this – if the criticism is wrong, then refute it.  Ascribing mental illness to people and/or implying they are some sort of infiltrator or agent provocateur is not a refutation, it is merely ad hominem.

And I wish these types were a bit more paranoid about “invented by the enemy” when it came to Patrik Hermansson and Dave Lewis. That would have saved much trouble and embarrassment.  If you cannot identify real infiltrators but instead suggest that authentic activists are such – well, how does that refute my criticisms about your poor judgment?  Indeed, it does nothing but support and reinforce such criticism.  Do better.

Note that I do not make such accusations here at this blog. The closest to that is the endorsement of an investigation - and only an investigation - to determine if any HBDers have association (directly or indirectly, knowingly or unknowingly) with the Chinese government or any other such operatives.  An investigation is just that – a determination about something unknown.  It is wholly possible, and I’ve stated as much, that the HBDers are innocent. Very well. In that case, they should welcome an investigation. The endorsement of an investigation was based upon, in my opinion, credible similarities between (frankly, ludicrous) HBD essays blaming covid-19 on an “American bioweapon” and strikingly similar Chinese government propaganda about same. The suggestion that an investigation was necessary was not simply due to disagreement or feuding, but on those aforementioned similarities and the damage done by that propaganda to the interests of those trying to get to the truth of the matter.

The sad thing is that the people (assuming they themselves are authentic) making accusations against others have actually facilitated the very infiltration they warn about.

An observation from Twitter:

Hard Right Turn@FelineDivisionReplying to @NewRightAmerica 

Your obsession with Spencer is consuming you Greg. Why not just forget about him and do you?

More advice to be downwardly mobile from Counter-Currents:

The first question posed to Greg Johnson and Fróði Midjord during the recent Counter-Currents livestream was, “If you could re-live your twenties, what would you do differently?” Greg’s answer was direct, clear, and quite pertinent to those of us considering an academic career — in the humanities, at least. Short answer: Don’t. Good advice.

Yes, "good advice." Let dem dere Jews and Asians get the PhDs. You stay in your parents' basement, reading Counter-Currents (gotta pump up dem page views!), and sending in your hamburger flipper salary money as "D'Nations" to Greg and company. 

How’s that ethnonationalist Brexit thingee working out for you?

No worries, Germany can help Turkey dump them back into Greece.  Yes we can!

Careful, ETs ,those Faroe Islanders are hunting for you!  Avast!  Harpoons to the ready!

Should this book have been entitled Key Retards of the Radical Right?

Johnson:

But you have to draw a line somewhere, and clearly Spencer and Friberg do not belong. They are shallow, self-promoting, pseudo-intellectual poseurs.

Thus, the pot calls the kettle black.

The following is borderline libelous:

Those with a more paranoid bent would connect the dots between Friberg being an antifa and police informant and the fact that Teitelbaum is an American Jew and conclude that he is simply an enemy agent being puffed up as a movement mastermind, i.e., controlled opposition.

Of course, people can make all sorts of similar accusations against Johnson or anyone else.  It doesn’t mean the accusations are true…or not. Evidence?  Where is the clear and irrefutable evidence?

Minsc
Posted March 7, 2019 at 10:41 am | Permalink
Jorjani would’ve been a better choice for the section on emerging thinkers that the most of those characters…
Reply
Greg Johnson
Posted March 7, 2019 at 11:25 am | Permalink
Yes, Jorjani would have been a very good choice

Jorjani’s work is, in my opinion pseudoscientific claptrap. “The spectral!” I’m not surprised that Der Movement considers such an intellectual lightweight to be a “key thinker of the radical right.”

Conservatives are not the only ones afraid of free speech.

Here’s an exercise for the reader – name one (just one) prominent Quota Queen who is currently:
A) Fairly evaluating the ideas, paradigms, and critiques discussed at EGI Notes
B) Willing to engage with the “insane” and “indecent” Ted Sallis
C) Not participating in a cordon sanitaire of the Sallis Groupuscule

I’ll make it easy for you – there are none.  Not a single one.  Consider that even an anti-Sallis opponent like Silver believes that the Quota Queens (at least Johnson) should engage, much less more neutral people who undoubtedly agree with Silver's assessment.

Who’s afraid of free speech, indeed?

Behold Durocher:

Guillaume Durocher says:
I shat a proverbial brick when I learned that one of De Gaulle’s first policies in newly-liberated France was instituting a MORE NORDIC IMMIGRATION POLICY

Is the following more accurate? -

I had to be hospitalized for an intractable priapism when I learned that one of De Gaulle’s first policies in newly-liberated France was instituting a MORE NORDIC IMMIGRATION POLICY

But, hey, if I label Durocher as a hardcore Nordicist that means that I am, of course, “insane” and “indecent.”  Where would I have ever got that idea from?

By the way, how did De Gaulle's policy work out?  From looking at current France, it would seem that his underlings must have confused "Nordic" with "Arab and African." Honest mistake.

A stupid yeastbucket, whose "contributions" to the "movement" are a silly podcast show and making "speeches" at conferences in which she giggles like a small girl caught "playing doctor" with an autistic and retarded boy, unburdens herself thus:

Lana
@LanaLokteff
10h
Pro-vaccine people really get psychotic defending their injections of sketchy substances. Look, knock yourself out and get all the jabs you want for all I care.
"My body my choice" except when..

Replies
Gotham Resistance
@Gothamresist

Replying to
@LanaLokteff
 and
@Tare1935
Never understood that. If they believe in the vaccines and believe they're protected, why get so triggered if others choose not to

Let's see. People object to open lies and pseudoscience, which smears the Right as scientifically illiterate, backwards, and alienates intelligent and rational people (and the same bent toward pseudoscience leads to HBD, Nordicism, "traditionalism," etc.).

Let's see. When the unvaccinated get unnecessary diseases it puts a strain on the healthcare system.

And most of all - vaccines are not 100% protective (that's not how biology works), immunity can wane with age, and there are some people who cannot get vaccinated for legitimate reasons (children under age one year for MMR or folks with allergic reactions or whatever).  So, there are always going to be, in a given population, people who - through no fault of their own - will be not protected. However, given herd immunity, the chain of transmission will be stopped before any significant number of such people are infected. To have such herd immunity, all people who can be vaccinated should be; the overwhelming majority of these will be immune. Vaccination is a collective social good. Lowlife trash who refuse to get vaccinated are free riding on the immunity of others without contributing to it.  

If filthy scum like this were prevalent in past decades, we would still have smallpox.  We would still have polio outbreaks and iron lungs.  It is because of them (and immigration) that we still have measles outbreaks.

But, hey, let's be fair.  Your body your choice.  Our choice too.  You get ill with a disease for which you chose not to be vaccinated against - no medical treatment. If you die, you die. Further - if you spread the disease to someone else who was vaccinated but who was one of the few not immune or someone who legitimately could not be vaccinated or an old person with waning immunity then you are legally on the hook for that.  At minimum - assault and battery.  If they die - homicide.  I'm sure if you kill an infant with your measles, the jury will be quite interested in your anti-vaxx polemics. Your psychosexual sweaty fear of being "jabbed" is worth killing someone, right?

Lana needs to demonstrate to us all the strength of her anti-vaxx convictions.  I suggest the following three-part program:

1. Get bitten by a rabid animal.  Make sure it's a real good bite, plenty of foaming saliva getting in there.
2. Refuse to get "jabbed" for rabies prevention treatment.  No rabies vaccine and no rabies immune globulin. After all, who knows what questionable substances are in those jabs? Maybe even a dastardly microchip invented by Bill Gates or some sort of toxin implanted by a cackling Jew doctor.  No jabs!
3. Go home to your family and be a loving mother to your children. Plenty of close contact with them in the weeks or months ahead.  It's all good!  What could possibly go wrong?

And it goes without saying that if your children were to be bitten by a rabid animal, you should, of course, refuse to have them "jabbed" as well.  Who knows what that Jew doctor is injecting?

The good news is that the nonsense of the Russess has a limited shelf-life. Once she hits the wall and looks like a babushka, no one will care in the slightest what she has to say. Give it time - perhaps less time than she thinks.  Age marches onward. Let us remember the well known MGTOW adage - when men get older, the look more and more like Sean Connery; when women get older, they look more and more like...Sean Connery.

In any case, those of us with a triple digit IQ and who are not hypocrites understand that in a society individual choices in many cases affect other people.  Indeed, isn't that why we on the Far Right criticize "my body my choice" race-mixing? Don't we oppose the idea that people can do whatever they want, even though it is destructive to the wider society?

Indeed, we all have societal responsibilities. The Millennials and Zoomers should reflect upon that the reason why they are not today pricked (not "jabbed") against smallpox is because all we older people were so pricked, and the virus was eliminated (in the wild). If someone - an incompetent TROPICAL Chinese lab for example - were to release smallpox, would The Retarded Right refuse that vaccine as well?