Odds and Ends, 5/14/22

In der news.

Laugh at this.

This White Revivalist movement seems dead on arrival. For one thing, the Dissident Righters are in the impossible position of being against all people except whites and, not infrequently, express themselves as favoring only North European whites. This reduces them to political hobbyists, unable to compromise. Further, Latinos are simply not behaving badly enough to support a white racial consciousness.

Fred Reed's logic leaves much to be desired. If the whole point of the "White Revivalist movement" is to promote specifically White interests, why should it also promote the interests of non-Whites whose presence in majority White nations is one of the biggest problems for Whites, who are typically hostile to Whites, and whose interests are already well cared for by the System? Reed's inter-racial marriage is not sufficient justification for a pro-White movement to be multiracial (the problem with WN 3.0 Rosie and the Kids White Nationalism). His implied criticism of Nordicism is a bit more relevant, but it is insofar as Der Movement is dishonest about it. If they want to be concerned only about Northern Europeans then they should explicitly state this, instead of practicing an implicit, furtive, crypto-Nordicism. They hide behind a "pan-White" veneer, while making sure that Der Movement is so hostile to White ethnics that such people are repelled. And his positive comments about Latinos are of course connected to the fact of his marriage and family.

My own basic objections to America First are that (in order of importance):

1. It is multiracial civic nationalism, which I oppose

2. It has, in my opinion, inept, juvenile, destructive, money-grubbing leadership

Since that also describes WN 3.0, what objections do the WN 3.0ers have?

In order of importance, it seems to be:

1. Fuentes is a competitor for D'Nations

2. Fuentes is a short, lawn jockey-sized manlet

3. America First criticizes women

America First vs. WN 3.0 - A duel of wits between unarmed opponents.

Observing the Counter-Currents/America First dust-up, it is clear that bioleninism exists on the Right as well as on the Left. Der Movement, and the associated, but different, Alt Lite, is full of freaks and misfits; it is a natural kakistocracy. How can one explain the prominence of individuals such as Johnson, Goad, and Fuentes without invoking bioleninism?

Laugh at this – two nitwits in discussion. The Nordicist Durocher talks to crypto-Nordicist Hood. Although there is some criticism of Marine Le Pen, there is no honest admission of the failure of mainstreaming and no admission that these "movement" heroes are always, always wrong about all of this.

Thus, listening to that nonsense, with all of the "deep" analysis of electoral details and all of the speculation, they do not address the 800 lb. gorilla in the room - the fact that mainstreaming failed once again, it ALWAYS fails, it has NEVER been successful, either in winning elections or in building the coalitions that Durocher thinks are so important.  These types love to sound sophisticated with their knowledge of esoterica, but they miss the forest for the trees.  It is also no surprise that the Nordicist Durocher disapproves of economic populism - that's common among Nordicists and HBDers, the love of "economic liberalism" that is in fact responsible for much of the racial crisis.

The Right needs to contest the centers of power, and not retreat into "twigs and branches" Type I activism. The point is not that the Left would be dislodged (very unlikely), but that some presence of the Right is required to provide assistance and protection for other activities and to cause chaos and disruption in the System. Dedicated, organized minorities can be very effective, at least to delegitimize the establishment.

The Ted Sallis opinion on abortion is as follows. Yes, abortion is murder. But so what?  People accept murder all of the time. When soldiers kill each other that is murder, even though we call it “war.”  When cities are bombed in “war,” civilians are murdered, and that includes children, babies, and pregnant women. When the USA imposed sanctions on Iraq, didn’t that result in civilian death, hence, a form of murder? A good case can be made that abortion in the USA has had a positive effect, re: race and eugenics, so the spectacle of Der Right – at least the mainstream Right – thinking that abortion must be opposed is pathetic, and the pro-abortion stance of the Left is hilarious. I for one am not going to oppose abortion in the multiracial USA, in which a disproportionate number of abortions are from Coloreds as well as the dumbest fraction of the human (i.e., White) population. A few other points: (1) if men are obligated to pay child support if they are the father (and in some cases, even when cuckolded!) then they should have a right to influence the decision about whether or not to continue the pregnancy, (2) it is interesting that the Left has no problem distinguishing men from women when leftists become hysterical over issues like this, and (3) re: the “protests,” we once again observe the System selectively enforcing the law to advantage the Left and disadvantage the Right.  Der Right ALWAYS loses, because it – ranging from mainstream conservatism to Der Movement – is essentially a grift, and those who are sincere are comically inept.

The thing that gets me about the Quota Queens is this. Even if they dislike me and my ideology and tactics, even if I am “insane,” that doesn’t change the objective reality of decades of utter failure for Der Movement, capped off by the disastrous collapse of the Alt Right, a permutation of the “movement” most of them supported. They won’t even admit failure in general terms, never mind admit any personal culpability for the failure. They have zero accountability; they take responsibility for nothing. They lurch from one catastrophe to another and after it is over pretend that it never happened or was just a minor setback on the glorious road to eventual victory. Even worse – they are hypocrites, for even though they label general criticism of their “movement” as “insane” and even though they’ll absolutely reject any personal responsibility, they will cite failures when it is convenient to do so as part of their feuds, in order to attack “movement” rivals. Thus, it is “acceptable” to cite the Alt Right disaster as part of an attack against Spencer, but we are not allowed to note that Taylor, Johnson, MacDonald, Brimelow, et al. were all on the Alt Right train at least until Heilgate, and in some cases, up until Unite the Right. It is “acceptable” to attack Fuentes, but we are not allowed to note all of the “movement” “leaders” who have supported Fuentes, praised him, were honored guests at America First meetings, etc. The fundamental dishonesty here, indicative of severe character flaws, is vomit-inducing.

I have what I call the "Full Sibling Test" to evaluate biologically-related schemes for separating people ingroup/outgroup, with a prime example being dividing people into ethnostates. If it is theoretical possible for full siblings to end up in different ethnostates based on the biological approach used, then that approach is flawed. That is one reason to reject dividing people based on phenotypic rankings or genetic ancestry testing percentage cut-offs. On the other hand, genealogical ancestry is sound, since full siblings will share the same genealogical background and hence the absurdity of full siblings being biologically separated into different ethnostates is avoided. Of course, dividing people on non-biological factors is another story. And all of this also applies to dividing people in ways other than for ethnostates.

Leadership Sociopathy

And other news.

See this. I would like to first consider this topic from the perspective of the actual post and then briefly examine how this can be extended to the “movement.”

Loyalty — of any kind — is a career impediment.

Loyalty to one’s race, religion, region (the South) etc., are not only impediments. Those kinds of loyalty are radioactive, instant death.

Even loyalty to one’s family is a career impediment. The normal young law firm associate wants to go home at 5.00 p.m. to be with his wife and child. The sociopath will work on till 8.00 on the important brief without any psychological conflict. He’ll call up the wife and tell her he won’t be home for dinner without any upset.

This explains someone like Biden feeling no loyalty to his country and being willing to pimp for those with power and money without any regard to what it means to people at large.

What makes the situation in America even worse, however, is that this situation is the opposite for the predatory ethnic groups seeking conquest at our expense.

Black, Hispanic, Jewish politicians are successful the more they are loyal. A law student who can put in his resume that he was President of the Black Law Student’s Association, the La Raza Club or the Hillel Foundation enhances his chances of getting a high-paying job with a prestigious law firm, a federal judgeship or election to the US Senate. (Like Schumer who was recently caught explaining to other Jews that his whole life is spent scheming on how to advance his own particular ethnic group.)

What these two contradictory patterns lead to is what’s going on in contemporary America.

Our antagonists are led by men whose loyalty to their ethnic group exceeds that of most of the others.  We are “led” by people like Biden, Clinton, John McCain, William F Buckley Jr., Johnny Isakson, Lindsey Graham, and Mitch McConnel who are bereft of loyalty to us.

This is another reason why there is no hope of reform under the present System.

I agree with this overall assessment. Yes, political leaders are, typically, sociopaths (or, if you will, psychopaths). Yes, and this is important, White political leaders are unique (in a negative sense) in that they are hostile to, and opposed to, the interests of their own people, in contrast to leaders of all other groups, who (almost) always strongly support and promote the interests of their own group. 

An older National Alliance ADV broadcast (I don’t remember if it was Pierce or Strom) mentioned a sociopolitical “ratchet” – events move only in the direction of anti-Whiteness and never in the direction of pro-Whiteness. If both White and non-White political leaders are anti-White and pro-non-White, thus having the entire political system hostile to White interests, then we can understand why this "ratchet" exists.

Of course, the HBD-Nordicists would have varied other explanations for the behavior of White political leaders; in some cases, perhaps those Whites are acting in a “sincere” manner in pursuing pathological altruism (high trusters!). Still, generally, it would seem that many of these leaders have strong strains of sociopathy, for the reasons explained in the essay.

This would in part explain why the ratchet moves in an anti-White direction in nations that have a White majority and the majority of voters being White. Yes, some Whites are leftists and openly act in defiance of group interests, and, in combination with non-White voters, there is a strong anti-White voting bloc. But, how did all of those newer non-White immigrants get here in the first place?  Why was the minority of Whites who are leftist allowed to get their way all the time? If you want to blame "the Jews," then who empowered them (and let them in the country to begin with), and who goes along with their agenda in exchange for "thirty pieces of silver?"

Political policies derived from White leaders put into office by a majority White electorate are responsible. But, here is an important point – even when the White electorate puts right-of-center political leaders into office, the same ratchet moves in the anti-White direction. So, even when Whites try and vote in the direction of their interests, they are betrayed by their leaders, most recently by Trump. Therefore, sociopathy plays a role, perhaps a crucial role. When your own leaders, across the entire political spectrum, betray you without remorse, with no conscience bothering them, who openly lie and betray – this seems to be sociopathy in action.

Moving to the “movement,” I would maintain that sociopathy plays a role as well. Gaslighters, grifters, betrayers, liars, lazy good-for-nothings – is it any wonder why Der Movement has gone from failure to failure decade after decade? When you combine sociopathy with outrageous incompetence, all protected by an ethnic affirmative action program – well, we see the utter catastrophe that is (American) pro-White activism.

Maybe we need to add some moralpaths to the mix?

Other news:

See this.  Well, OK, if you agree that women are basically whores who exchange sex to gain goods, favors, and concessions from men, and who have nothing else to offer society, I suppose that’s an effective approach for inducing change.  What say you, ladies?

Of course, the tactic is not going to very effective with the typical married Western man, who’s not “getting any” regardless of circumstances. Milady, how can you go “on strike” if you’re not “working” in the first place?

The solution for men? The man strike. Note what the article says:

“Successful lysistratic non-action works best among large groups of women who have little or no power in the social system.”

That’s exactly the type of women who NEED men for support and resources. So, fine. No sex?  Then no money, no food, no support.  Walk out on the harridan and let her go rot. After all, when men (except for Travis Bickle) pay for prostitutes they expect sexual activity in return.  Children involved?  Take them away and let their grandmother take care of them.  Is grandma supporting the strike?  Well, then tell grandpa to leave her and let her go rot as well.

Another intellectual product from the brave new Counter-Currents. Title: “white-people-need-to-start-fucking-again.”

Of course, all of the highbrow Herrenvolk who turn up their nose to the “uncouth” Sallis Groupuscule will, of course, have nothing to say about “white-people-need-to-start-fucking-again.”

Laugh at this.

Perhaps Le Pen’s progress is indeed explicable with what Le Monde calls her “permanent normalization”: she is perpetually moderating her discourse…

And perpetually losing. There isn’t the slightest evidence that mainstreaming is a winning electoral strategy.  And even if I turned out to be wrong here, and she wins – to what end? The purpose of winning elections should be to actualize a political agenda, not merely to attain power for its own sake. If a moderate and “normalized” Le Pen is elected and ends up doing little to nothing for France and Europe, then who cares?

…and sending signals to make herself more “presidentiable” in the eyes of the mainstream media and skittish center-right voters (think pensioners and bourgeois Catholics disturbed by Afro-Islamization, but also wary of the potential instability and incompetence of a Le Pen presidency, particularly in the economic sphere).

So, if these voters are “skittish” of Le Pen, and believe that a Le Pen presidency will be characterized by “instability and incompetence,” then why should they vote for her if she moves so far toward the center that the political distance between herself and Macron – particularly if he feints right for the election – is negligible?

Le Pen’s closer advisor and brother-in-law Philippe Olivier says: “There is no more detoxification, now is the time of presidentialization.”

The moves towards normalization include praise for Charles de Gaulle (loathed by Le Pen père for his abandonment of the 1 million Europeans of French Algeria), the commemoration of the victims of the Vel d’Hiv, agreeing with the media that the “Great Replacement” is a baseless conspiracy, and providing only qualified support for the persecuted group Generation Identity on grounds of free speech.

And that substantially differs from Macron how, exactly?

In a debate with Interior Minister Gérald Darmanin, the Macronist even sought to attack Le Pen from the right saying: “you’re practically soft now.”

Exactly. That is a key component of my argument against Durocher’s mainstreaming that I have been making for years now. If Le Pen moves so far to the center that that she can be outflanked on the right by Macronists, and if voters are “skittish” about her, then why the hell won’t they just vote for Macron? If it’s between a “stable” known quality centrist and “potential instability and incompetence” of another centrist slightly more to the right (maybe), where’s the incentive for favoring the latter over the former?

And even if she does win, then we get this:

Indeed, Le Pen now is very careful to distinguish between Islam and Islamism. Islam is “a religion like any other” with its place in France, she says, reserving her trademark “far-right” rhetorical fury for the government’s failure to eliminate “Islamism.”

That’s great.

By the way, Durocher, if Salvini was so wonderfully popular among Italians, then they can, you know, elect him back into office, this time to the top spot. Why not? I mean, if he’s so insanely popular and all, right? 

Let’s see mainstreaming accomplish two things.  First, win a major election. Second, after that victory, leverage power to actually get something done to benefit native Europeans. Can we get one – just one – example of accomplishing both? 

Don't mention Orban. He's an example of the opposite tactic - farstreaming, moving further to the right. Orban is now to the right of Jobbik, and he's more popular, and successful, than ever before. Trump's success in America came in 2016 when he moved to the right; he failed in 2020 moving to the center (putting aside election fraud; he could have still won in 2020 if he had done better among White men).

There is actual electoral success observed with farstreaming, none with mainstreaming. But promoting mainstreaming makes you look ever-so-clever to the peanut gallery, so let's all burnish our "pragmatic" mainstreaming credentials, despite zero actual success backing up that paradigm.

Meanwhile, the despicable Unz site promotes anti-vaxxism, particularly with respect to covid-19. Fascinating when Jews promote anti-vaxxism.  They are very good at making sure their Israel is well protected, but, hey, let’s convince the goyim that the vaccines are “toxic operating systems.”  More for the chosen ones, eh?

Der Movement onanism material.  HBDers are looking for the Japanese equivalent.

Of course not. Ben Dover! Remember, Ben Dover! Reality is here. But, hey, The Holy Orientals are off limits. Let’s focus on “mRNA operating systems” and “face diapers” instead, amirite?

Full Moon Autism, Liddell on Sallis

And other news. In all cases, emphasis added.

Laugh at this.

Whether attending a birthday party or a social event, people have sometimes referred to me as being “the life of the party.” There have also been times where I found myself excluded from my social circle and community. 

The lack of self-awareness is simply astonishing.

Recently, I found myself not being invited to a birthday party that some of my other friends were invited to.

I suppose they figured that freakish autistes would ruin the mood.

Although I always try to stay positive and optimistic, I couldn’t help but feel ignored and forgotten. 

How about wondering why no one wants to be around you?

Unfortunately, social circles are often filled with drama. Two guys become rivals, so going to a friend’s party means that I become the enemy of the rival and his friends. This may seem immature and childish, but this also happens in the Dissident Right. 

Hey!  Don’t be “crazy and bitter” now!  

Supporting certain content creators means that you sometimes become the enemy of another content creator and their supporters. Even if you try to stay neutral, sometimes you end up being ignored and abandoned by your community. Such is the nature of life and social circles.

Especially when you associate with a Drama Queen who ends up feuding with everyone in the “Dissident Right.”

As much as we try not to care or worry about these things, there may be some evolutionary reasons why we get bitter and resentful when our social circles abandon us. 

“Bitter and resentful?” What a “paranoid piece of crap!”

Whenever I find myself not invited to a social event or party…

A regular occurrence?

…I try to put my feelings aside for a moment and analyze the situation. Could it be that it was simply a misunderstanding? 

No, they simply don’t want to be around you, and for good reason.

There have been a few times when a mutual friend confirmed that the person holding the event did not have my current contact information. Or they mistakenly thought that I did not want to come to their event. 

Sure, sure.

After clearing things up, I ended up going to these events and having a great time. There have also been times where I found out that I wasn’t invited to an event because someone at the event didn’t want me to be there. In a situation like this, I think it is important to find out whether it is one person or numerous people who do not like you.

Believe me…it’s “numerous.”

I learned early in life that despite your best efforts, not everyone is going to like you or be your friend. If there is one person in your social circle that doesn’t like you, my best advice is to continue going to social events and ignore them. This can cause a different set of issues, but you should never let one person force you to miss out on life and social events. The real dilemma comes when two or more people in your social circle convince the others not to invite you to parties or events. 

Friberg pay attention.

This situation has happened to me a few times in my life, and both times caused me to reflect on myself and ask some tough questions. Have my actions and behaviors caused people in my community to not want to associate or spend time with me? 

Yes.

After analyzing the situation, I concluded that it was better to spend the evening alone. 

Evening after evening after evening. “Mom’s basement” is looking better and better, huh?

This metaphor perfectly summarizes the balance between being a bold individual and calming your ego to get along with a group.

He’s a “bold individual”…yeah, yeah, that’s the ticket.

When reading these essays, I eventually realized that I wasted a lot of time and energy over not being invited to a party. Nevertheless, I ended up having a great evening and was happy that I discovered Schopenhauer’s writings.

This navel-gazing childish drivel is reflective of the extent to which Counter-Currents content has collapsed.

Being invited to a party or an event feels great, but it is not the end of the world if I am not invited to some events or disliked by certain people. Some things are just not meant to be. 

A world historical problem solved.

Despite all the fun I had partying with metal bands in my 20s, the last few years in the Dissident Right have been some of the best times of my life. I have made a lot of great friends who have started to form their own networks and communities. 

From which you will not be invited.

Maybe I will see you there. 

I pray not.

Whether I am drinking at a bar with friends or streaming from my mom’s basement, I always enjoy being the life of the party.

“Mom’s basement”…says it all.  This guy’s a walking parody.

Invitation or not.

Usually not.

Laugh at this.

(((TED SALLIS)))

A former Counter-Currents writer of apparent Italian ancestry and probably a late Boomer of [sic] early Ge-Xer. His name is believed to be a pen name derived from a Marvel comics character. Unluckily for him, he was too straight for Greg Johnson's online journal, and fell out with Johnson on the gay question sometime in 2016. His writing can now be found at his rather dull blog EGI Notes.

Unlike certain other folks, I’m not going to screech that this is “scurrilous” (it is rather tame), but I instead will correct one error (not the spelling/grammar error of “of/or”). Thus, while I’m not going to comment about the “apparent” swarthoid ancestry, or “pen name,” or the opinion of this blog being “rather dull,” I’d like to correct something about “fell out with Johnson.” True, I’m heterosexual and I would have left writing for Counter-Currents by 2016 or so due to the increasingly pro-homosexual propaganda there (*). But I had stopped directly writing for Counter-Currents before then, and the real falling out, which occurred much earlier, was mainly due to Johnson’s tolerance of, and promotion of, the scum Andrew Hamilton. I wrote a lot about Hamilton’s Counter-Currents writings at my “rather dull blog” at that time, and those are in the archives here. 

Johnson continued to reproduce my “rather dull” blog posts at Counter-Currents for several years (without asking me, by the way), and I continued to sometimes comment there, but that ended several years ago when Johnson “banned” me due to my criticism of the Hermansson infiltration and my overall critiques of the “movement.” Later Twitter comments by Johnson suggested that others had been urging him to have nothing to do with me, and I can imagine who those individuals were – the usual array of “movement” grifters and incompetents.

Some of the information about other people on that Affirmative Right post is useful, or at least amusing, but I note that Liddell likes to critique the physical appearance of people on the so-called “Dissident Right,” and shares the bizarre obsession over height that many in Der Movement apparently have. Hypocritically, Liddell writes about Duke:

Some of the money may also have been used on the large amount of plastic surgery that he seems to have subjected himself to. This focus on personal "optics" gives off a weirdly sub-masculine vibe, reminiscent of Richard Spencer and Greg Johnson. This is significant as it suggests that people like this are recurring type in racial politics.

Indeed they are. Let’s not focus on "personal optics" or anything like that, right?  Yes, focusing on the physical appearance of other men "gives off a weirdly sub-masculine vibe,” I agree. The lack of self-awareness there is astonishing. 

I do praise Liddell for this description of Durocher though:

In physical terms he is, not surprisingly, a most un-Aryan-looking specimen. Those with an interest in the Aryan archetype often fit into this unprepossessing category (see Weev, Andrew Anglin, Mike Enoch, and Striker for further reference).

Not very Nordic! But Liddell leaves out what is, I believe, the most important point about Durocher. Being a superior Scotsman, I trust that Liddell will eventually figure it all out for himself.

Seriously though, I really don’t get it. Yes, I understand that, in a race-based “movement,” phenotype is of relevance. But there’s a difference between something being relevant in a general sense, and an obsessive fixation on the physical appearance of other men. I honestly could care less what any of these people look like and to what measurement the top of their head would reach in a mug shot. If being tall was relevant for leadership, then Johnson and Spencer would be leading us to victory. Both of them have “Nordic” or at least “Nordish” facial features, yet they are completely inept. So, what’s the point? Are either of them any better than Anglin or Collett?

Zman a wop? I don’t see it. I thought he was most likely of East European ancestry, if not, then maybe Northwest European. But what do I know? In any case, one does not have to be a dago to oppose Liddell’s extreme ethnic fetishism.

By the way, hint to Liddell – your analysis of Brimelow would be effectively augmented by the financial information about VDARE freely online here.

In summary, despite my critiques of Liddell, I note that he does not follow the cordon sanitaire. He may believe this blog is “rather dull” but at least he acknowledges that it exists, which is more than I can say about others in Der Movement. Those others behave as if Sallis was some sort of bogeyman, the mere mention of whom (other than “paranoid piece of crap”) will magically make all of their D’Nations disappear.

*There is no way I would want to be associated with The Homo and the Negro or with My Nationalist Pony. Furthermore, the Pilleater recording was atrocious, the “last straw” for any sort of decency. When a young man complains about homosexual harassment and groping at a meeting associated with your group, the proper response should be outrage and a determination to find out the facts and, if true, BAN the offenders from any association from your group, not to chuckle indulgently about men “flirting” with other men.

Other news:

I laugh at all the nitwits still insisting that cold, winter, and snow are "White"; that winter weather dissuades non-Whites. Sure it does.  After all, good thing there's no Somalis in Maine or Minnesota, right? Wow, Negroes of every type are being kept out by that cold weather, none of them in Boston, New York, Detroit, Minneapolis, Milwaukee, Philadelphia, Chicago, etc. No Hispanics there either!  No Hindus or tropical Orientals!  White, White, White!

A comment from Stormfront that may be of interest to the GNXP cogelites:

I can't say I had rally bad experience with blacks since I lived in mostly Mestizo, Hindu and oriental neighborhoods. So it's Mestizos and Hindus for me.

Now I live in a predominantly white neighborhood and there are a few blacks around, but these are white collar people and way more civilized than your average ghetto negroids. I'm just glad I never had to face the crack selling, trouble making, scum of earth ghetto blacks.

When my income was half of what it was today, I had to live in a Mestizo neighborhood and it was total hell. I can't believe I came out of there as one piece. They always fired guns in the middle of the city to celebrate cinque de mayo or weddings, they bred swarms of cockroaches and rats, they got drunk and started fights at 3 am, married couples were throwing pots and pans at the walls whenever they fought (after midnight). There were cops at the door almost every week. Oh, I forgot the loud ass ghetto cacophony with the window shattering bass. I have spent half of my free time calling the cops on these scumbags.

Then I lived in a predominantly Hindu town. That was no walk in the park, either. You'd have a hard time believing that was California: It looked more like freakin' Delhi or Bombay, minus the open sewage and the beggars with leprosy. Even though the Hindus were white collar IT workers and didn't fire guns, smoke crack or start fights in the middle of the night, they were still quite rude and uncivilized. Extremely high pitch screeching banshees (Indian music) has replaced the window shattering bass. They were arrogant, rude, always frowning and irritating. Their brainless wives and kids ran in the parking lot all the time, I was surprised a bunch of them didn't get killed.

Once I had to knock the door of the morons upstairs cause they woke me up with vacuum noise well after midnight. I was so pissed I went out of bed straight to their door in my pj's, looking like a zombie. When I asked what the heck they were doing, they said their kid spilled something on the carpet and they were cleaning it up with the carpet washer! 3rd world idiots probably got too excited and bought every appliance they could lay their hands on. Wiping the carpet with a wet towel is apparently too much of a hassle after they crawl out of their dunghole country!

The other Hindus didn't make much noise but their uncivilized little brown chimp kids did. They gave everyone a headache at the pool by constantly screaming and splashing water on people, and the management did nothing despite all the complaints filed by the handful of white residents. Even though the adult Hindus didn't make much noise except for the idiots with the carpet washer, they made the entire apartment complex reek of greasy food. It reeked so bad you could not breathe in the corridors. They also reeked real bad when you passed near them, they were apparently too broke to buy personal hygiene products after spending all of their money on electronics and gadgets. On top of that, they were breeding a swarms of cockroaches and some of them didn't want to let the pest control treat their apartment cause of their ridiculous beliefs. They believe in reincarnation nonsense, so according to their primitive religion, the cockroaches could be their dead freinds/relatives/whoever and shouldn't be touched!

Another ridiculous 3rd world behavior of theirs was to swim in the swimming pool with long dresses and turbans. Can you believe that? Hindu women swam with long, bulky dresses and the Sikh guys were swimming with their turbans! This is disgusting and a threat to the hygiene.

That was a once decent high income California neighborhood that has descended into 3rd world levels -not pricewise of course, but qualitywise. Nowadays you pay 1300-2000 a month or more to live with that scum, in apartment complexes that cater to the Hindus, displaying Hindu movies in their club rooms and harboring 3rd world savages acting like they are in the Ganges when they use the swimming/spa facilities, stinking up the whole place, breeding roaches and giving any American dirty looks that read 'no more American way of life, you bow to the Indian way of life!' Whites get the most arrogant stares of course.

Then there were the slant eyes. They also had cockroach problems (I have seen GIANT Asian cockroaches come out of the backdoors of Vietnamese restaurants, even $$$ ones), habit of yelling with their irritating language and wife beating. I really got sick of calling the cops on the orientals beating up their wives.

After all these years of suffering and humiliation -I can't think of any other word to describe a situation where you pay $$$ to live in 'upper class' apartments dominated by 'educated' savages with 3rd world habits- I'm really glad to live in a predominantly whie [sic] city and a predominantly white neighborood. I don't mind upper middle class/white collar blacks, at least they are raised with American values and have some first world manners. I'd take a white collar negro over a Hindu or oriental with phd any day!

Fetishists Weep

In der news.

See this summary.

Sequencing the genomes of over 400 Viking men, women, and children from ancient burial sites, researchers found evidence of genetic influence from Southern Europe and Asia in Viking DNA dating back to before the Viking Age (750 - 1050 A.D.).

Is Durocher being fitted for a straightjacket just about now?

Asia…hello, Bjork and David Bromstad! Or are the “Ladogan” phenotypes from the earlier North Asian/Siberian influxes?  It’s of great benefit to all humanity!

Some years ago, on another of my blogs, noting the discovery of some Arabic artifacts (coins, I believe) from Viking-era Scandinavia, I speculated on the possibility of “exotic” gene flow there, for which I was attacked by another (not Durocher in this case) individual, who also claimed (to another person) that there was no gene flow from Southern to Northern Europe for “10,000 years” (or some other similarly large number).

To which I now repeat my mantra, re: Der Movement:

Wrong, wrong, they’re always, always, always, always, ALWAYS wrong.

No doubt we will soon see an updated edition of March of the Titans, with added material on admixture in Scandinavia and on multicultural Vikings.

Seriously though, both sides here are wrong. The Right has always been wrong with their sweaty fetishism and their insistence on racial purity narratives; the Left is wrong when they use the discovery of genetic outliers and low level admixture to paint a false picture of a multicultural past that somehow justifies mass immigration today – as if the odd Dago or Asiatic in Viking-era Scandinavia justifies having Swedish cities of today becoming Afro-Asiatic war zones, or to mean that indigenous Scandinavians are not a relatively homogeneous North Germanic people. Both Right and Left are dishonest about race and ethnicity.

Of course, the results of that study will be being overblown for leftist, pro-immigration political reasons. However, the bottom line is that, whatever the past influx, ethnies are genetically distinct, and Scandinavians are a distinct Northern European Germanic group.  

Scandinavians are indeed a relatively homogeneous North Germanic people. It’s just that “relatively” is not the same as Der Movement’s “absolutely.”

This goes back to my essay on the racial purity myth. The issue is not one of purity but one of distinctiveness.  Europe and non-Europe are distinct from each other; more narrowly, Northern and Southern Europe are distinct from each other; Western and Eastern Europe are distinct from each other.

Distinct does not mean hermetically sealed; it does not mean “pure.” Gene flow, within reason, is compatible with distinctiveness.  Maybe at some point, the retarded “movement” will understand this, and be able to effectively respond to leftist mendacity with respect to the leftist cry of “see, you were always multicultural."  No. A single drop of black paint dropped into a 100 gallon drum of white paint is not the same as dumping 40 gallons of black paint into that same drum.

Your wonderful “race realist” allies from the world of HBD:

JohnEngelman  

Two of the best friends I have had were black. One was a college professor who taught at Howard University. One was a co worker at an electronics firm…My co worker was a good Christian and a good family man who took his family to church every Sunday.

I have liked every black person I have known by name…

Remember, wops and hunkies are the problem; nice Blacks, law-abiding Hispanic immigrants, and those high, high IQ Jews and Asians are your friends!

HBD Jew supports racial and cultural assimilation.

Always remember that the alien Levantine filth Unz is your enemy (emphasis added):

America today stands as one of the very few examples in history of a large and successful multiethnic society. If we are to continue and extend our success–which is hardly foreordained–we can only do so by returning to the core principles of Propositions 209 and 227: ethnic assimilation, and individual equality under the law. Otherwise, we face the very real threat of future movements along the lines of Proposition 187, each worse than the last, and on a national scale. There are few forces that could so easily break America as the coming of white nationalism.

And don’t forget treasonous filth like Durocher and Johnson who write for Unz.

Here is a wonderfully coherent Counter-Currents comment on the death of Francis Parker Yockey:

TimothyS

Posted September 19, 2020 at 2:42 am | Permalink

“An apparent suicide.”

Reach out for help you f… fools. Don’t hang up that phone. Ask for help. Idiots, selfish idiots.

There’s no stopping a Phil Haney. But for anyone else, there are a lot of people who will reach out to help you. Don’t let humiliation get in the way. Unsuspected people will take your call again and again. Keep making those calls. Don’t lose heart! They’re busy, tired? Ask them who THEY would call.

Later, it will not be your absence, but the self-doubt:. Why did my friend, my cousin, my son kill themselves? Am I WORTH IT? There is something wrong that will gnaw at them for years. That doubt will cruelly torment them long after all your problems are ‘solved’.

Counter-Currents – the gift that keeps on giving!

If the Trump campaign had any sense, they’d focus on this issue and hammer away at it mercilessly. To try and forestall accusations of “racism” (I wouldn’t care, but I assume the Trumpians do) have Carson explain it (and if there are some law forbidding a cabinet member from making political commercials, then use another of Antifa Don’s Negro buddies).  Some of Dementia Joe’s SJW suburban support may dissipate if folks had a clear idea of the situation. But given the affirmative action incompetents and Jews surrounding Der Trumpening, I am not sanguine that the campaign will take advantage of this gift of an issue.

The beginning of the Alt Right?

It is unlikely Johnson will write any “in bed with the press” articles about this.  Why expect any consistency from the clown show?

Greg Johnson on his moronic livestream: “Yockey died for our sins, as someone said.” 

That “someone” was “Ursus Major” of the Euro-American Student Union, and that quote was brought to everyone’s attention recently by my recent post – I very much doubt Johnson remembered the original essay.  No doubt Johnson saw that from EGI Notes.  So, yet more Johnsonian mendacity by omission.

No worries, Greg, Ursus Major as well as Yockey would have considered your petty nationalism as disgusting treason.  It are the sins of ethnonationalists that Yockey died for.

Borat: Yockey - “very American” – what a moron.  Maybe petty nationalist ethnonationalists should pontificate on things other than Yockey.

None Dare Call It Treason

None except for Sallis.

Read this.  What else do you expect from the Unz HBD site?  What do you expect from a site that blames The China Plague on “an American bioweapon,” shills for China, has as its owner a Jewish supporter of Hispanic Reconquista, and which promotes Nordicism designed to divide Whites against each other for the benefit of Jews and Asians?

That dumb Unz piece misses the entire point.  The ultimate issue is not about crime or IQ or whatever – it’s about the demographic and cultural displacement of Whites.  It is about EGI and civilization, not crime statistics and PISA scores.  It is about genetic kinship and cultural affinity, not a ranking of group traits according to scales designed to suit the interests of wealthy Levantines. Whites should support White interests precisely because they are White, not because of what turds like Unz or Lynn or Rushton or Sailer or Dutton or any of them say about particular traits of Whites vs. those of others. Whites should not oppose immigration of (non-White) Hispanics or Asians because of some ranked traits but precisely because those groups are not White; they are not us. How difficult can that be to understand? And can we be surprised that some sort of HBD Spencerite “racialist” goes groveling to Unz with mea culpas?  And that is why White HBDers are a problem – they judge groups based on proximate measures rather than ultimate. So, to them, Hispanics are evaluated based upon whether or not they rioted a lot recently, rather than on Hispanics' relative genetic (and cultural) distance from European-Americans. From a racialist viewpoint that is a disaster, and it is inevitable that weak-minded fools who base their worldview on HBD are going to turn against WN, because at the most fundamental basis HBD and WN are essentially incompatible.

To better understand the depths of Unzian Middle Eastern mendacity, consider the argument there – that WN is “politically bankrupt” because it focuses on immigration – an existential issue for White survival that White people actually DO care about, as demonstrating by opinion polling and by the election of Trump in 2016 – instead of, you know, focusing on IQ scores and Durocherian Nordicism, that White folks not only care zero about, but would consider strange, disconnected to their interests, and the province of cranks and autistic weirdos.  Why is it that members of the tribe ALWAYS promote memes to Whites that are racially destructive?  They just can’t help themselves, can they? EVERY. SINGLE. TIME.

And, finally, that is why any “White nationalists” – like Johnson and Durocher – who write for Unz are despicable traitors.  Neither of them needs to write for Unz (of course, no one does in fact).  Johnson has his own Counter-Currents site.  Durocher has written for a variety of other sites in the past and nothing stops him from starting an independent blog (possible name: The Clouseau Chronicles).  No, they choose to support and enable a Jew who attacks WN and supports non-White immigration. EGI Notes, on the other hand, is steadfast in its opposition to Unz. Or should I say (((Unz)))?

Then we have those veteran WN 1.0 heroes, who have made their career opposing Jewish power (or pretending to do so), but who cannot utter a single word against HBD, Unz, or any of the White traitors who sell out their race for Unzian “race realism.”  I suppose such utterances would not be “politically” expedient.  Another example of what the likes of Gunther, Grant, and Stoddard would consider the sublimely honorable nobility of Nordic Man.

It is a matter of judgment and character.

Behold Egalism (emphasis added):

…a system called egalism. The government provides all the necessities of life, and in exchange the people work only thirteen hours each week. (All other work is performed by machines or by outside contractors--at great price.) The remainder of their time is spent in the leisurely pursuit of pleasure: games, sport, sex…Egalism requires sacrifices, though. The people are crowded onto one small island called Arrabus; the vast continents of Wyst are sparsely populated wilderness. The government provides all food, but the only choices available are three bland concoctions: gruff, deedle, and wobbly. Arrabins go to great lengths to get taste of real food, which they call bonter. People live in colossal featureless apartment blocks, in tiny rooms with randomly assigned roommates. Personal possessions are scarce, and frequently stolen (or snerged as the Arrabins say.) The egal ideal is absolute equality between persons, so individualism is stifled. Even the differences between sexes are suppressed as much as possible. Making oneself too appealing to the opposite sex is sexivation, and is socially discouraged…it is clear that egalism is a failed experiment. The machines that keep Arrabus running are breaking down. The Arrabins, working only thirteen hours a day at menial jobs, are not able to effect repairs, and Arrabin exports can no longer cover the cost of hiring outside contractors.

It is also interesting that the Arrabins are extremely anti-immigration, as they claim they cannot maintain their social system with the mass influx of immigrant parasites who want to take advantage of it.  I’m sure Unz would object, as long as the immigrants are Hispanic or Asian.

The following is an Arrabin female addressing an outworlder male in that book: “We’ll copulate if you like; you can show me some new and amusing antics.”

Another Arrabin female is described thus: “…a blonde, kitten-faced girl with small feet and a ripe figure displayed almost to the point of sexivation…”

If such exemplified Vance’s own preferences, then obviously he was not an HBDer.  Or an Alt Right flirter.  Or the keynote speaker at an Alt Right meeting.  Jack was not suitable for the Mannerbund.

Oh, that Jack Vance…

Let’s ignore the works of Gene Wolfe and Jack Vance, and the lessons therein about human behavior and societies, and instead crack open our copy of Tolkien in our hobbit hole.  The battle for Middle Earth begins!  That’ll be complete with Unz telling us that opposing orcs is “politically bankrupt,” and Durocher busily using calipers to compare the cephalic indices of northern vs. southern hobbits.

Of interest.  Why is it that the anti-White system merely provokes protests to become even more anti-White, rather than the opposite.  A first in history – in which an oppressed population riots in favor of more oppression.  High trust northern hunter gatherers!

It is abduction.  The problem, you see, is that the Right, as an empty vessel, lacks the legal infrastructure to pursue this to its logical conclusion.  If such an infrastructure existed, then, pooling together a number of like cases, and assuming properly litigious clients, the local government could be sued for allowing the civil rights of the drivers to be violated, and for failing to enforce the law (as well as the anarcho-tyranny of politically-motivated selective prosecution); further, the protestors themselves, once identified via social media and other mechanisms (starting with “Seun”), can also sued. There’s also probably a RICO criminal case or two there if you sift around aggressively enough – but that of course requires a sympathetic district attorney.

In any case, it is quite clear that legal room for maneuver exists – IF the Right were anything other than a useless grift.

Christianity must be destroyed.

Consider this.

After spending most of my 20s in Scandinavia, I noticed that white Europeans were also becoming minorities in certain areas of Western Europe. This was one of the reasons why I decided to relocate to Eastern Europe for the past two years.

That’s it with these Herrenvolk.  Their homelands have been destroyed by their own feckless co-ethnics, so time to move into someone else’s lands.  Ethnonationalism!  What hypocrites.  Let’s hear more from the Quota Queens how “Poles should not be living in Western Europe.”  Indeed, they’ll write that article as soon as they finish screwing that Polish girl in Warsaw.  Ethnonationalism!

Remember my prediction for 2020:

Here's a very easy prediction for 2020: Expect more outrageous hypocrisy from Counter-Currents.

Counter-Currents: The absolute worst, most outrageously hypocritical Far Right site on the Internet. Oh yes, let’s preach the wonders of “ethnonationalism” and “petty nationalism” while engaging in ethnosupremacist ethnoimperialism, living in the nations of other peoples and taking their women.

A Counter-Currents “writer” whines:

My nephew suffered the most from her lackadaisical parenting. He became very spoiled from eating cheap calorie fast food. The breadth of his nutritional intake came from chicken nuggets, French fries, pepperonis, be they on a pizza or straight out of a package, and hotdogs. His grandmother (my mom) had to make sure her freezer was always stocked with the same garbage. It was so bad that he literally refused fruit, vegetables, soups, salads, or even meat that wasn’t served out of a frozen cardboard box.

Hey!  With the exception of the French fries and pizza crust, that sounds a lot like the carnivore diet promoted by the great and good Jef Costello.  So what’s the problem?  Just substitute the fries and crusts with more chicken nuggets and hot dogs and you’re all set! After all, Eskimos eat whale meat, so…chow down, son!  Hopefully you won’t get apoplexy sitting on the toilet.  Fiber?  You don’t need no stinkin’ fiber!

Who Should You Listen To In the Dark Days Ahead?

Me or them?

This is your “movement” – 

Joe Dixon  

The McVeigh bombing and The Order were creations of the government and they guys that are in prison today are the fall guys. It wouldn't surprise me if the character that they called McVeigh is happily sunning himself on some tropical beach living under an assumed name or maybe under his real name.

Amren marches on:

John Flower  Michael Whalen Look under Alphaville (1965) at the end of this article. I get a lot of my thoughts disallowed, erased and even re-written here because he does not appreciate my point of view or respect my privilege to share my thoughts.

My thoughts have actually been re-written and when I attempt to return them to my original words, it is disallowed. I have to avoid using certain words in this/every thought in order to have them allowed.

AmonGothII  John Flower He gets a number of us. I try not to visit this site as much as I used to. It's taken a sorry turn for the worse since I originally started in 2007. See alot of others who have left altogether and some like me have scaled back. Comments is only decent aspect of this site, and now being snowflake effeminate moderated.

The Nordicist Durocher gloats…with some squid ink at the end to confuse the stepandfetchits. How are your Herrenvolk doing these days, Durocher?

Very cognitive, very elite.  No doubt that the TROPICAL COLORED Chinese are supporting their TROPICAL COLORED allies as part of THE TROPICAL ALLIANCE. [Please ignore that weeping off in the corner…that’s just Derbyshire in a fetal position]

When you read this, remember that the Quota Queens were calling Trump “a man of genuine greatness,” a man of “sincere” belief, an American Caesar who is the “last chance for White America.”  Even here, Costello labels Trump a “last hope.”  I, on the other hand, accurately labelled Trump as a “vulgar ignorant buffoon” even before the 2016 election.

Now, it’s true that we are all in big trouble if Trump loses.  But, you know, it didn’t have to be that way.  If Der Movement had taken my advice, and used the past four years to QUIETLY build in depth, build a real infrastructure – while at the same time leveraging mainstream right-wing populism (NOT “movement” antics) to “trigger” the Left in a manner to cause chaos to benefit that QUIETLY building vanguardist activism, we would not be in this position today, regardless of the outcome of the election.  Der Movement basically did the worst thing possible – frittered away the past four years AND triggered the Left by “movement” antics that shined the light of Leftist fury on racial nationalism, instead of diverting it to expanded right-wing populism and Trumpism.  Trump could have been the perfect foil to absorb the Left’s attention, with careful stirring of the pot by our side – INDIRECTLY, while racial nationalism grew in the shadows.  But, no.  The Quota Queens had to have their Unite the Right, had to have their meetings and Twitter accounts, had to put on a show to reinforce their status and their “D’Nations.”  You all listened to the losers who were WRONG about Trump, instead of listening to Sallis, who was (almost) always right.

So, assuming the worst occurs, ask yourself this question – who should you listen to in the dark days ahead – the folks who are always, always, always wrong about virtually everything or the folks who are right, say, 95% of the time?

Put another way – in times of crisis, should you follow inept affirmative action cases whose only reason for being in positions of leadership is that they “chose the right ancestors,” or should you follow individuals with a proven track record of good judgment and of typically being correct in their predictions and suggestions?

I’ll certainly write more in the future on what needs to be done, but to be brief – what we need is more electoral politics, more legal action, and more infrastructure building – and less freakishness and bizarre dogmas and less grifting for “D’Nations” from useless do-nothings. That applies to whatever electoral outcome occurs, but if Trump loses, the electoral politics and legal action efforts move way up to the top of the list.  I’ve written about this before – explaining why and will no doubt do so again.   All I’ll say now is that if the Quota Queens think that “business as usual” is going to suffice, they are leading you all right off the cliff (but not before they milk you of your “D’Nations”).

Never forget this.  We all talk about the Hermansson fiasco, but this was almost as bad.

Amren declares war against White ethnics? - 

The Dispossessed Majority by Wilmot Robertson — An extremely valuable racialist text…

I’ve warned all of you stepandhfetchits repeatedly.  They really do despise you.

Odds and Ends, 5/23/20

In der news.  In all cases, emphasis added.

The elegant John Simon unfortunately passed away last fall.  Simon, of Hungarian descent, seems to have been a good man:

In 1981, an ad in a Hollywood trade appeared accusing Simon of being "racist, anti-Semitic, misogynist, vicious and derisive." It was signed by 300 artists, apparently upset that Simon's review of Richard III complained that an actress in the show "should never be cast as anything but an itinerant gefilte fish with a nervous condition."

Well, as we know, obesity is related to higher covid-19 risk.

Meet Ron Unz.

Born in California, to a Ukrainian-Jewish immigrant, Unz was raised in a Yiddish-speaking household. His mother, Esther-Laio Avrutin, met his father on an airplane heading for Israel. A professor from the Midwest, he later briefly became her lover when visiting her on a few occasions in Los Angeles. She unilaterally decided to have a child with him, but Unz's father was already married and his wife opened a letter from Avrutin telling him about her pregnancy. She was an anti-war activist, who raised her son as a single mother, but Unz was given his father's surname and soon moved back to her family's home after her son's birth.

What about the dangers of cheap Chinese labor?

Due to the Chinese state confiscating supply chains and ethnic Chinese shipping masks in the West back to the homeland, there were so few disposable masks, especially highly effective N95 respirators, available for purchase by Americans that hospitals were having terrible difficulty sourcing personal protective equipment. Perhaps some authority figures understood the reality and thus intentionally misled the American public to preserve crucial facemasks for healthcare workers.

Of interest.

Over the years, Johnson and Spencer have sparred. A lot of the conflict, according to alt-righters, had to do with personal style. (Spencer became the best-known face of the “frat” style, polo-and-chinos alt-right; Johnson has dispensed with such pretenses.) But the tension between them also underscored an ongoing debate about how best to save America from itself. Johnson was seen as the Socrates of the radical right. He has a Ph.D. in philosophy and, before publicly embracing the cause of the white ethnostate, taught at Morehouse College, which is historically black. In Johnson’s view, the far right had to win the war of ideas before it could move on to the “real world” battlefield. That meant books and articles, speaking engagements, conferences, symposia. He had a way of explaining things that made racism and Jew hatred sound like post-structuralism or supply-side economics—something that was once new or avant-garde or even suspect and, over time, acquired a large following.

Spencer was more of a would-be Vladimir Lenin. He also took ideas seriously; he had pursued a Ph.D. at Duke, in intellectual history, before dropping out and moving to D.C. But he was mostly uninterested in ideas divorced from action. He wanted to be in the middle of things. He had pondered a congressional campaign in Montana, where he usually lived. He felt let down by Trump. (“His administration,” Spencer said in an interview, “is not fundamentally different than a [Mitt] Romney administration—or even a Hillary [Clinton] administration. I never expected him to be me. But I expected him to do something.”) The feeling on the alt-right was that Charlottesville had been a disaster because it had left so many members demoralized and fragmented the movement. For Spencer, political outcomes mattered.

Some interesting Twitter comments:

Highbrow Gentleman

@Hibrowgent

@NewRightAmerica

 and 

@ReadLinkola

So disappointing Greg. Stop being so petty.

Aureum

@Aureum_Kolovrat

@NewRightAmerica

 and 

@ReadLinkola

Promoting a #DuggAnon style psyop propaganda from a source with no name is very low ball. 

Please do better. Greg if you disagree with someone then it would be most honorable to debate them instead of smear them with trash like this that sends our spergs down the rabbit hole.

Aureum, you had better watch out, before you’re called “insane” and “indecent.” Debate?  He don't need no stinkin' debate!

Well, I’m not optimistic either, for two reasons:

First, the only possible vehicle for complete redemption – racial activism – has been compromised by the incompetent Quota Queen “leadership” and their rank-and-file Nutzi followers, coupled to an inane and “insane” fossilized dogma.

Second, the dominant element among Europeans today is the “high trust northern hunter gatherers.”  While there are – contra the HBD liars – strong elements of pathological altruism in Southern and Eastern Europe, I’ll agree with the HBDers that it is strongest in NW Europe. Having the SJW Herrenvolk captaining the HMS Europa is leading to a bigger disaster than the Titanic.

I was very supportive of Trump during the 2016 election.

Indeed. And, at the same time I was referring to Trump as a “vulgar ignorant buffoon” who I endorsed solely because of the chaos he would bring in his wake (which he did).  Who was right? Who was wrong?

I agree, Greg (except for the invention part, see below). The problem is that some of the people you’ve feuded with can say the same about you.

The "invention" accusation is, unfortunately, a new low in "New Right" discourse.  It’s not enough for Johnson to call his critics “insane” and “indecent” - here he implies that some of them may have been “invented by the enemy.” Criticize him and you are - what?  A CIA asset?  A SPLC or ADL agent? A HopeNotHate operative (no, wait, that’s Hermansson)? A reporter for The Stranger (no, wait, that’s Lewis)?  

You see, disagreeing with someone, criticizing their behavior and ideology and actions, holding them accountable – that makes you a “horrible” person. Or an “invention of the enemy.” 

These types, who have an inflated sense of their own self-importance, have to personalize everything. As I’ve repeatedly written here – my criticism of people in the “movement” is business, not personal. I do not know them personally nor do I care to. Who knows? They may be kind to animals (except whales), generous to strangers, pleasant enough in private interactions, real salt of the Earth.  But if these people – particularly self-styled “leaders” – are in my opinion destructive to the cause, I’m going to call them out on it.  It’s “punching right” – which Johnson approves of (at least when he does it to others).  If the behavior is, in my opinion, hypocritical, mendacious, defamatory, etc., then the criticism will be harsh.  But, also, the thing is this – if the criticism is wrong, then refute it.  Ascribing mental illness to people and/or implying they are some sort of infiltrator or agent provocateur is not a refutation, it is merely ad hominem.

And I wish these types were a bit more paranoid about “invented by the enemy” when it came to Patrik Hermansson and Dave Lewis. That would have saved much trouble and embarrassment.  If you cannot identify real infiltrators but instead suggest that authentic activists are such – well, how does that refute my criticisms about your poor judgment?  Indeed, it does nothing but support and reinforce such criticism.  Do better.

Note that I do not make such accusations here at this blog. The closest to that is the endorsement of an investigation - and only an investigation - to determine if any HBDers have association (directly or indirectly, knowingly or unknowingly) with the Chinese government or any other such operatives.  An investigation is just that – a determination about something unknown.  It is wholly possible, and I’ve stated as much, that the HBDers are innocent. Very well. In that case, they should welcome an investigation. The endorsement of an investigation was based upon, in my opinion, credible similarities between (frankly, ludicrous) HBD essays blaming covid-19 on an “American bioweapon” and strikingly similar Chinese government propaganda about same. The suggestion that an investigation was necessary was not simply due to disagreement or feuding, but on those aforementioned similarities and the damage done by that propaganda to the interests of those trying to get to the truth of the matter.

The sad thing is that the people (assuming they themselves are authentic) making accusations against others have actually facilitated the very infiltration they warn about.

An observation from Twitter:

Hard Right Turn@FelineDivisionReplying to @NewRightAmerica 

Your obsession with Spencer is consuming you Greg. Why not just forget about him and do you?

More advice to be downwardly mobile from Counter-Currents:

The first question posed to Greg Johnson and Fróði Midjord during the recent Counter-Currents livestream was, “If you could re-live your twenties, what would you do differently?” Greg’s answer was direct, clear, and quite pertinent to those of us considering an academic career — in the humanities, at least. Short answer: Don’t. Good advice.

Yes, "good advice." Let dem dere Jews and Asians get the PhDs. You stay in your parents' basement, reading Counter-Currents (gotta pump up dem page views!), and sending in your hamburger flipper salary money as "D'Nations" to Greg and company. 

How’s that ethnonationalist Brexit thingee working out for you?

No worries, Germany can help Turkey dump them back into Greece.  Yes we can!

Careful, ETs ,those Faroe Islanders are hunting for you!  Avast!  Harpoons to the ready!

Should this book have been entitled Key Retards of the Radical Right?

Johnson:

But you have to draw a line somewhere, and clearly Spencer and Friberg do not belong. They are shallow, self-promoting, pseudo-intellectual poseurs.

Thus, the pot calls the kettle black.

The following is borderline libelous:

Those with a more paranoid bent would connect the dots between Friberg being an antifa and police informant and the fact that Teitelbaum is an American Jew and conclude that he is simply an enemy agent being puffed up as a movement mastermind, i.e., controlled opposition.

Of course, people can make all sorts of similar accusations against Johnson or anyone else.  It doesn’t mean the accusations are true…or not. Evidence?  Where is the clear and irrefutable evidence?

Minsc
Posted March 7, 2019 at 10:41 am | Permalink
Jorjani would’ve been a better choice for the section on emerging thinkers that the most of those characters…
Reply
Greg Johnson
Posted March 7, 2019 at 11:25 am | Permalink
Yes, Jorjani would have been a very good choice

Jorjani’s work is, in my opinion pseudoscientific claptrap. “The spectral!” I’m not surprised that Der Movement considers such an intellectual lightweight to be a “key thinker of the radical right.”

Conservatives are not the only ones afraid of free speech.

Here’s an exercise for the reader – name one (just one) prominent Quota Queen who is currently:
A) Fairly evaluating the ideas, paradigms, and critiques discussed at EGI Notes
B) Willing to engage with the “insane” and “indecent” Ted Sallis
C) Not participating in a cordon sanitaire of the Sallis Groupuscule

I’ll make it easy for you – there are none.  Not a single one.  Consider that even an anti-Sallis opponent like Silver believes that the Quota Queens (at least Johnson) should engage, much less more neutral people who undoubtedly agree with Silver's assessment.

Who’s afraid of free speech, indeed?

Behold Durocher:

Guillaume Durocher says:
I shat a proverbial brick when I learned that one of De Gaulle’s first policies in newly-liberated France was instituting a MORE NORDIC IMMIGRATION POLICY

Is the following more accurate? -

I had to be hospitalized for an intractable priapism when I learned that one of De Gaulle’s first policies in newly-liberated France was instituting a MORE NORDIC IMMIGRATION POLICY

But, hey, if I label Durocher as a hardcore Nordicist that means that I am, of course, “insane” and “indecent.”  Where would I have ever got that idea from?

By the way, how did De Gaulle's policy work out?  From looking at current France, it would seem that his underlings must have confused "Nordic" with "Arab and African." Honest mistake.

A stupid yeastbucket, whose "contributions" to the "movement" are a silly podcast show and making "speeches" at conferences in which she giggles like a small girl caught "playing doctor" with an autistic and retarded boy, unburdens herself thus:

Lana
@LanaLokteff
10h
Pro-vaccine people really get psychotic defending their injections of sketchy substances. Look, knock yourself out and get all the jabs you want for all I care.
"My body my choice" except when..

Replies
Gotham Resistance
@Gothamresist

Replying to
@LanaLokteff
 and
@Tare1935
Never understood that. If they believe in the vaccines and believe they're protected, why get so triggered if others choose not to

Let's see. People object to open lies and pseudoscience, which smears the Right as scientifically illiterate, backwards, and alienates intelligent and rational people (and the same bent toward pseudoscience leads to HBD, Nordicism, "traditionalism," etc.).

Let's see. When the unvaccinated get unnecessary diseases it puts a strain on the healthcare system.

And most of all - vaccines are not 100% protective (that's not how biology works), immunity can wane with age, and there are some people who cannot get vaccinated for legitimate reasons (children under age one year for MMR or folks with allergic reactions or whatever).  So, there are always going to be, in a given population, people who - through no fault of their own - will be not protected. However, given herd immunity, the chain of transmission will be stopped before any significant number of such people are infected. To have such herd immunity, all people who can be vaccinated should be; the overwhelming majority of these will be immune. Vaccination is a collective social good. Lowlife trash who refuse to get vaccinated are free riding on the immunity of others without contributing to it.  

If filthy scum like this were prevalent in past decades, we would still have smallpox.  We would still have polio outbreaks and iron lungs.  It is because of them (and immigration) that we still have measles outbreaks.

But, hey, let's be fair.  Your body your choice.  Our choice too.  You get ill with a disease for which you chose not to be vaccinated against - no medical treatment. If you die, you die. Further - if you spread the disease to someone else who was vaccinated but who was one of the few not immune or someone who legitimately could not be vaccinated or an old person with waning immunity then you are legally on the hook for that.  At minimum - assault and battery.  If they die - homicide.  I'm sure if you kill an infant with your measles, the jury will be quite interested in your anti-vaxx polemics. Your psychosexual sweaty fear of being "jabbed" is worth killing someone, right?

Lana needs to demonstrate to us all the strength of her anti-vaxx convictions.  I suggest the following three-part program:

1. Get bitten by a rabid animal.  Make sure it's a real good bite, plenty of foaming saliva getting in there.
2. Refuse to get "jabbed" for rabies prevention treatment.  No rabies vaccine and no rabies immune globulin. After all, who knows what questionable substances are in those jabs? Maybe even a dastardly microchip invented by Bill Gates or some sort of toxin implanted by a cackling Jew doctor.  No jabs!
3. Go home to your family and be a loving mother to your children. Plenty of close contact with them in the weeks or months ahead.  It's all good!  What could possibly go wrong?

And it goes without saying that if your children were to be bitten by a rabid animal, you should, of course, refuse to have them "jabbed" as well.  Who knows what that Jew doctor is injecting?

The good news is that the nonsense of the Russess has a limited shelf-life. Once she hits the wall and looks like a babushka, no one will care in the slightest what she has to say. Give it time - perhaps less time than she thinks.  Age marches onward. Let us remember the well known MGTOW adage - when men get older, the look more and more like Sean Connery; when women get older, they look more and more like...Sean Connery.

In any case, those of us with a triple digit IQ and who are not hypocrites understand that in a society individual choices in many cases affect other people.  Indeed, isn't that why we on the Far Right criticize "my body my choice" race-mixing? Don't we oppose the idea that people can do whatever they want, even though it is destructive to the wider society?

Indeed, we all have societal responsibilities. The Millennials and Zoomers should reflect upon that the reason why they are not today pricked (not "jabbed") against smallpox is because all we older people were so pricked, and the virus was eliminated (in the wild). If someone - an incompetent TROPICAL Chinese lab for example - were to release smallpox, would The Retarded Right refuse that vaccine as well?