Thanksgiving 2021

Let’s be thankful.

Happy Thanksgiving!

Things to be thankful for:

That the Quota Queens are so inept, and their idiocy of Der Movement is such a failure, that they have delegitimized many of the negative aspects of their ideology.

That the Left is so crazy and, if anything, even dumber than the Retard Right, that American chaos and balkanization is increasing, creating a pool of disaffected Whites who could in theory by attracted to a sane movement (that unfortunately does not currently exist).

That the Salterian concept of ethnic genetic interests (EGI) remains unrefuted, even though there are delusional idiots who wrongly believe that it is.

That the stupid "movement" got humiliated once again, supporting someone who has publicly come out as an "anti-racist" who supports BLM.

That I see increasing numbers of "movement" blog commentators critiquing the slavish Asian-worship of the Quota Queens and Quota Queen sycophants.

Other news:

Listen to this. What are the highlights?

Ethnonationalism is no defined as “showing respect” to the majority population in a mixed population.  Thus, Rosie and the Kids in America and John Morgan in Hungary are allowed. Surprise!

The anti-Italian vulgar Jim Goad is invited to speak at next year’s Amren conference. Surprise! 

Johnson wants the gay Renaud Camus to speak at a future Amren conference. Surprise!

My choices for future Amren conferences: Patrik Hermansson, Dave Lewis, Rosie Derbyshire, Thomas Jackson, Trevor Lynch

Seriously though, if there is such an emphasis on international speakers, why not Noman Lowell?  Or is he too “Med” for Amren?

Filipina Malkin received “standing ovations” at Amren.  Surprise!

Johnson excited that Rittenhouse on Carlson. Still excited after the cucking?

Hungarians an ethnostate with “some foreigners” – oh indeed

Der Movement loses again. Millions of dollars go into “movement” coffers, but no legal infrastructure. There’s a price for grifting. When money is flushed down Der Movement’s toilet, there is less for everything else.

Movement Money Pit

The tin cup is overflowing.  In all cases, emphasis added.

See this; I friend of this blog forwarded that very interesting article.  Let us consider together. I will assume that all of the information listed below, and the tax form information from which it is derived, is accurate; if it is not, the groups mentioned should correct it. The ProPublica not-for-profit database is currently not updated with this information. I will first fisk the article and then make my main argument at the end.

For the second year in a row, the right wing’s favorite dark money donation vehicle has given an unprecedented sum to a notorious white nationalist hate group.

Putting aside the breathless, inflammatory verbiage (“dark money, notorious, hate”), the basic problem here is that most of the groups in question are NOT “white nationalist” but instead are “yellow supremacist” HBD “race realist” and/or immigration restriction-minded civic nationalist. Now, even though the groups in question are not White nationalist, they all are definitely part of Der Movement; note that I have been chronicling how Der Movement has been abandoning genuine, authentic White nationalism in favor of the emerging HBD-Nordicist-ethnonationalist-Amnat alliance that centers on the ideologies promoted by those non-WN “movement” groups. So there is no inconsistency in stating that they are not White nationalist but are part of Der Movement.

New tax records obtained by the Center for Media and Democracy (CMD) reveal that nonprofit charity DonorsTrust bankrolled the New Century Foundation—an alias for American Renaissance, a white nationalist organization led by Jared Taylor—with $600,000 in 2020.

Consider that very carefully the next time Amren rattles the tin cup.

That amount exceeds the New Century Foundation’s total annual revenue in any year since 2010.

They’re moving on up.

American Renaissance, which is designated by the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) as a white nationalist hate group, is Taylor’s online magazine and is known for creating the black-on-white crime myth…

It’s not a myth. It is based on official statistics, for example, those from the FBI.

…which has inspired terrorists including Dylann Roof to commit mass murder.

Nonsense.

“You don’t exactly need a PhD to understand why Jared Taylor is a white nationalist”…

I have a PhD, and I understand that Jared Taylor is NOT a White nationalist – he self-identifies as a “White advocate” and a “race realist” (i.e., a HBDer) and he has suggested that some people may view Amren as “yellow supremacist.” Amren conferences have featured Jews, Asian, and race mixers as speakers. I am a White nationalist, not Taylor.

…said Michael Edison Hayden, a senior investigative reporter and spokesperson for the SPLC. “He believes that Black people are less intelligent, less empathetic, and less human than white people. 

Well, that’s true, isn’t it?

He will tell you that with his own words and does so every day on his website, which is so grotesquely and openly racist I sometimes feel nauseated reading it.”

If by “openly racist” you mean animus against White ethnics, then yes, I’ve chronicled Amren attacks against (Southern) Italians, Hungarians, and Romanians at EGI Notes. Other than that, Amren is extremely mild, milquetoast, milksop stuff.  If it is nauseating, it is because the pro-Jewish and pro-Asian attitudes extant there. And if this idiot gets sickened by reading the weak sauce of Amren, then he’d probably keel over and drop dead after reading EGI Notes.

DonorsTrust is a fund associated with the Kochs, the Mercers, and other right-wing billionaire families. It is a donor-advised fund sponsor, meaning that it manages individual charitable accounts for its clients for a fee. These clients, who can hide their identities from the public by using DonorsTrust, “advise” DonorsTrust about where the money should go, but the organization has total legal authority to decide which organizations will receive funding.

They can give their money where they damn please. I don’t like the Quota Queens wasting money that could be used better elsewhere, but there’s no accounting for donor taste.

In 2020, DonorsTrust also gave $75,000 to the foundation behind the prominent white nationalist hate group VDARE, the tax records show. 

Stupid and factually incorrect breathless soyboy posturing. VDARE may be prominent in Der Movement but it is NOT “white nationalist” nor does it promote “hate.” If only that characterization was true, then I could support VDARE’s mission, but it is not true.

The previous year, as CMD first reported, DonorsTrust gave over $1.5 million to the VDARE Foundation. 

Well, there’s a lot of “executive compensation” needed there, no doubt.

The amount was far greater than the group’s previous annual revenue record and likely helped VDARE purchase a castle in West Virginia. 

So that’s where the money came from?

In total, VDARE took in a whopping $4.3 million in 2019, as CMD and the SPLC reported.

Remember that the next time Der Movement cries poverty, and tells you they can’t build a legal infrastructure because of financial reasons.

VDARE, led by Peter Brimelow, promotes the white genocide conspiracy theory…

It is not a conspiracy. Demographic change, which is celebrated by the Left, is an objective fact.

…a central tenet of white nationalism…

Brimelow is NOT a White nationalist.  He is an immigration restrictionist civic nationalist.  That is the agenda of VDARE, along with HBD “race realism.”

…has published apologia for white nationalist terrorists..

Nonsense.

…and regularly churns out anti-immigrant propaganda. 

So what? Immigration can legitimately be challenged. By the way, Brimelow was an immigrant, and Derbyshire was an illegal alien immigrant.  

“There’s ethnic specialization in crime,” said Brimelow at a 2017 event hosted by American Renaissance, “and Hispanics do specialize in rape, particularly of children. They’re very prone to it, compared to other groups.”

That’s true, isn’t it?

As the American conservative movement, inspired by the racism and conspiracy theories of former president Donald Trump…

If Trump is a “racist” then he’s one against White people, having taken their votes and doing nothing to help them, not even mentioning them as a group in any public address or comment, while foaming at the mouth about how much he and his administration helped every group but Whites.  And most of the “conspiracy theories” have turned out to be, likely, true.

…moves further and further to the right…

Yes, that “conservative movement,” and the GOP that serves as its vehicle, may even reach the point it was in the 1950s, under that radical Nazi Dwight Eisenhower and his Operation Wetback.  Truth is, the “American conservative movement” (sic), just like American society as a whole, has been moving left for decades. Any correction to that, however minor, is to be welcomed.

DonorsTrust has dramatically increased its funding of white nationalist hate groups. 

Name one such group, not including groups whose ideology contradicts authentic White nationalism.

Before 2019, the charity had not donated to such groups, although for some time it has been financing anti-Muslim, anti-immigrant, and anti-LGBTQ hate groups. 

Is the SPLC an anti-White hate group?

As CMD reported, the trend continued in 2020: DonorsTrust doled out large sums to the Center for Security Policy ($1.8 million), the David Horowitz Freedom Center (nearly $200,000), and the Pacific Justice Institute ($74,000), among other extremist organizations.

So, anyone to the right of you is an “extremist” peddling “hate.” Did you ever stop to consider that one reason that DonorsTrust has expanded its donations to groups you despise is that it is a response to the hateful leftist extremism of people like you, and of the SPLC?

DonorsTrust did not immediately respond to an emailed request for comment.

They are under no obligation to answer to the likes of you.

“DonorsTrust deserves all the scrutiny it can get for funding American Renaissance,” said SPLC’s Hayden. “

How about those who donate to the SPLC?  What kind of “scrutiny” do they “deserve?”

All Americans, regardless of race…

Lie. Don't speak for me, scumbag.

…suffer immensely when financial institutions lift up those who deem Black people to be subhuman…

Why should Americans suffer by truth being funded?  Doesn’t truth set you free?  I for one suffer by having to live among subhuman Blacks.

… It sets our country back by decades.”

Quite the opposite.  The problem is not the agenda Hayden fantasizes about.  If that agenda was actually being funded, and good work was being done with that money, then that would be beautiful. Unfortunately, what we have instead is money going to inept “race realist” and civic nationalist Quota Queens.

Other donor-advised fund sponsors finance white nationalist hate groups, but not nearly as generously as DonorsTrust. Some of the biggest charities in the nation have recently given money to the New Century Foundation, the VDARE Foundation, and other white nationalist organizations.

Again, you mendacious, lying, gaslighting, dishonest piece of utter filth, the New Century Foundation and the VDARE Foundation are NOT “white nationalist organizations.” In my opinion, what they stand for is antithetical to genuine White nationalism.

The National Philanthropic Trust donated to these two groups for the first time in 2020, giving $50,000 each to the New Century Foundation and the VDARE Foundation. Through a spokesperson, the trust evaded responsibility for its donations.

They are not obligated to explain their donations to the likes of you.

Our donors recommend grants that support a variety of organizations, all in good standing with the IRS, which may be on differing sides of a cause. NPT does not take a position on which causes our donors support however we carefully follow strict due diligence procedures to ensure compliance with all applicable laws and regulations. In accordance with NPT policy, we suspend grants to charities under investigation by any regulatory body that calls into question an organization’s ability to carry out a charitable mission.

That’s reasonable.

Other recent funders of white nationalist hate groups include the donors-advised fund sponsors linked to the Fidelity, Schwab, and Vanguard investment firms.

Interesting.  Why are they donating?  There are many possibilities here, some good, some not. Buying “insurance” in case things get “hot?” Co-opting genuine White nationalism by funding its intra-“movement” opposition?  A response to being shocked by the behavior of the Left over the past few years?  Who knows?

The people who should be interested in all of this is not hysterical leftists, but pro-White activists, who give their hard-earned money for “D’Nations” and who probably don’t know how well off the recipients of those donations are, and would be outraged by how little is being accomplished by all the money received.

I need to get in this racket; when I retire, I need to get on the “movement” gravy train!  Shilling for shekels!  Look at the chart at the end of the article.  Where’s my money?  My tin cup is empty. Oh the agony!

Now comes my main message, which is all 100% consistent with everything I have been writing about Der Movement and its finances over the last few years.  Der Movement loves to cry poverty, rattle the tin cup for “D’Nations,” engage in constant fundraising, excuse their endless failures by claiming a lack of funds and other resources, but, as you can see, in reality, they are doing quite well financially. They are certainly doing better than any of us, and certainly doing better than the masses of activists, some of whom who are not doing well, who shell out the shekels to pad Der Movement’s overflowing coffers.

The problem is not that Der Movement is making big money.  The problem is that they are making big money while:

• Constantly shilling for “D’Nations” from rank-and-file activists and putting forth the façade of being struggling, deplatformed, and defunded victims fighting a System in which virtually everyone is against them.
• Promoting ideologies that are hostile to, and in competition with, the pan-European White nationalism that I espouse.
• Accomplishing little of value for pro-White activism as a whole, taking resources away from potential activities that could be of value, while, in some cases, getting comfy “executive compensations” for doing things other people do for nothing.

There are serious consequences for this waste of money,  Consider the recent Unite the Right civil suit decision. The "movement" lacks an effective legal infrastructure in part because the financial resources are not available - and yet the Quota Queens are taking in "unprecedented sums" of money.  Do you see the problem?  

Odds and Ends, 10/22/21

In der news.

Der Movement’s hatred of Southern Europeans is borderline psychotic. The self-obsessed egomaniacal Nordicism is also deranged.  See this.  Emphasis added:

…if Nino wins, he gets to bring his family up from impoverished, dead-end Sicily.

He likes the Swiss. They’re calm, rational, affluent, and ordered; so unlike the screwed-up Italy that offers him nothing.

Then, Nino is getting on the train to go back to Italy. He’s broken and annoyed by the other Italians on the train: chummy, cocky, singing songs like O Sole Mio; all that sun, sea, and happiness.

She’s a cut above him in that she’s educated…

shrugging off the usual Italian songs of sun, happiness, and Bella Italia. Yeah, right.

…the workers stare as the Swiss enjoy a beautiful lake. They stroll, kiss, shed their clothes, and swim, contemplating beauty like the Eloi in H.G. Wells’ The Time Machine as we hear a delicate oboe solo, almost like the opening scene of the movie with its quartet and the placid Swiss by a lake. We see blonde hair and firm, naked bodies, tall and poetic on horseback, while the runty Italians stare. The Commedia dell Arte meets Wagner.

Nino, like his fellow workers, are transfixed by the Swiss. It is a defining moment in the film and our age of the relations between north and south. People come to northern Europe to work, compelled by conditions in their homelands, but there is another draw to the north as well: it’s orderly, rational, blonde, quiet, poetic, and beautiful. The southerner can’t resist it; in fact, the world can’t. Despite the south’s inefficiency and resentment against the north and its economic power, the south can’t take its eyes off the Nordic types. They are beautiful and serene.

If the Swiss as like the Eloi in Wells’ The Time Machine, the Italians are the Morlocks, but hardly savage and brutal; they’re rather penned up like chickens who are awed by the swans.

Germany and northern Europe are still the predominant economic powers, now filled with guest workers. It recalls the Taverni brothers’ film Padre Padrone, where a Sardinian farmer keeps his son in illiterate servitude. When the Germans come looking for guest workers, the son’s hopes of finding freedom up north is ended as the father drags him away from the recruiters and back to herding goats — goats who shit in his milk pail.

…he is served by a dark-haired Italian, and for a moment, he blinks . . . but he goes on. Live the vision!...He looks at himself in the mirror. That blonde hair. That strength. Beauty. Vision. His eyes widen, and he dashes his head in the mirror.

The blonde girl, who hasn’t taken her eyes off him, comes out and offers help. Nino, embarrassed, swats her away. But it’s okay, she says; I’m not one of them. I’m one of you. She whips off her blonde wig, and a cascade of black hair tumbles out. “España!” she cries in triumph.

Nino groans. “Would you believe it?” he cries, and passes out.

As the train rolls south, a man plays his guitar and sings. Yes, of happy Sicily; all we need is the sun, the warmth, the blue sea, a pretty girl . . .

That look comes to Nino again. The train rolls on, chugging away, and enters a tunnel. A pause. Nino emerges from the tunnel with his pet suitcase, eyes haunted, a zombie…

If Nino could bring his family, they would be Sicilians in Switzerland, like the Turk…

But we can still appreciate Nino and his struggle: A tramp being pulled one way and another like Sicilian taffy…

Comment from that post:

I saw “Bread and Chocolate” back when it came out, and enjoyed it, but it is truly a sad and demoralizing movie.  The setting was, of course, chosen to heighten the racial and cultural disparities between the Italians and the Swiss.  Not all Italians are Sicilians or short or dark; there is an Italian part of Switzerland that is presumably neither as dysfunctional as Sicily…

Of course, Johnson avers that there is no affirmative action in Der Movement. Obviously, a S. Italian has an equal chance of being accepted as a “movement” “leader” as a WASP, right?

The Alt Right is dead.  Those are your "leaders." Please keep in mind this is not 20-20 hindsight. I was criticizing the Alt Right before Unite the Right, and I was promoting the idea of behind the scenes quite organizing and infrastructure building during the Trump interregnum. At the very least, if you are going to have public rallies, plan for contingencies and have proper operational security. Screaming about "octoroons" isn't quite satisfactory for that.

Priority number one for any rightist dissident movement is a robust and aggressive legal infrastructure. You need that BEFORE you do your public rallies and speeches. And, yes, that costs money - better to spend $340,000 on that than for someone's "executive compensation" to "maintain an online publication." Or for "fundraising" to support the "work" of Counter-Currents. Der Movement simply is not serious.

Lawfare should be illegal. But it exists. In that context, consider this comment from Amren:

I read Parts I and II. My final assessment of the Unite the Right Rally was that it was poorly organized, involved too many clown-show racists, and was not adequately thought out. This is not to say that the government and police department of Charlottesville, as well as then-governor Terry McAuliffe, were not all despicable scum. They were - and are. But in retrospect, having Richard Spencer (who later came out of the closet as a left-wing Democrat) and Matt Parrott, a cuck and a goofball who stood by while fat boy Matt Heimbach screwed his wife, just reveals the true character of so many who attended this fiasco.

Is that who you want to have in charge?

I don't like people telling me what to do; I don't like mandatory activities. So, I don't think the vaccine mandate is ethically and morally optimal. I would rather have people do as they please, but be held accountable for their choice. So, folks who refuse the vaccination would in turn be refused medical care if they contract covid, and would be held legally responsible if they infect others. Unfortunately, that is not practical according to medical laws as well as so-called medical ethics. But it is theoretically preferable from a moral and ethical standpoint, although from a public health standpoint the mandates do have some validity.

Remember when I wrote up about the Etruscan study? Italianthro now has an analysis on that, which is reasonable.  See this quote form a paper mentioned in that analysis.

Multiple Iron Age populations characterized by different languages and cultures lived in Italy but, genetically speaking, they started to approximate the modern Italians (Aneli et al. 2021; Antonio et al. 2019).

Essentially, much of the genetics of Italy, and of Europe as a whole, were already in place in the ancient world.

Amren 2021: Jews and Filipinas.

Does White nationalism really actually exist any more? Today, Der Movement is a mash-up of HBD race realism, Trumpian populism, spiced up with a dash of Nordicism and the crazy crap of Counter-Currents. The hardcore White nationalism that existed in the 1990s (for better or worse) is gone.

Would Pierce have invited Filipinas and Jews to speak at NA meetings? Would Asian girlfriends been welcome at Rahowa concerts? Did the Creativity movement talk about Asian superiority?

Things are quite different today than in the 90s.  Back then, the bulk of the "movement" was, for better or worse, NS-oriented.  Amren stuck out like a sore thumb back then for being non-NS and moderate; today, Amren is considered "extreme" compared to America First and Trumpism. As someone who lived through all of these events, in retrospect, the death of Pierce was a dividing line between the old WN-oriented, NS-focused "movement" and today's HBD crap. I was visited by an activist, by coincidence the very day Pierce's death was reported in the media. Upon meeting, we just stared at each other for a moment without saying anything.  We knew an era ended and things would never again be the same.

Others now seem to agree. See these comments from Counter-Currents:

DonqyWashOctober 21, 2021 at 7:29 am

This is now what, the fourth or fifth article posted about this film? Does this website have some kind of stake in the ticket sales or something? There’s no such thing as a “pro-white” movie coming out of any Hollywood studio in 2021, and one would think the contributors on Counter Currents would be well aware of that fact. Why in the hell would I want to watch yet more racial replacement garbage prominently featuring a prominent hypercompetent negress character? This is a staple of virtually every movie and television show produced now, and I’ll gladly opt out. Wokeshit propaganda wearing once-enjoyable IP’s as a skinsuit isn’t something you’d expect to see promoted on a dissident platform.

Vagrant RightistOctober 21, 2021 at 8:50 am

My guess is topical film reviews help recruit new people in a gentle way. But yes it might be at the expense of focusing on other frankly more important topics. I don’t think these articles about Bond are for the converted personally.

There is a broad trend on the Right now to move ever more towards meta; film reviews, music, analysis of other people in the movement (which was mentioned critically in a comment on the podcast article about America First), philosophy, based Christianity and paganism, while some of our people are even saying that race and the JQ are passé, old news, WN 1.5 or something. I’ve even heard people apparently in our circles say we need to be less ‘about race’.

And it’s not just people like Fuentes that are an issue here. There are really smart people who only a year ago were presenting themselves as hardcore pro-white third positionists, now they present themselves as Christian theologians.

To me it looks like for many of our people – their content, frankly even their beliefs in some cases, are being shaped by our oppressors; internet censorship, fear of losing accounts and in a number of European countries harsh laws, but they are telling themselves “I’m sophisticated, I’m not just about race like you dated wignats”. I don’t buy that.

I’m not saying this is the case here though, but film reviews are like the ‘good cop’ aren’t they ? They need to be accompanied by the ‘bad cop’ or we’re not really delivering a payload.

See this.  Sallis right, and prescient, once again.

The Alt Right is a callow, superficial, moderate, intellectually and ideologically shallow version of pro-White activism; lacking seriousness and depth; oriented toward millennial snark, trolling, and social media; taking breathless excitement over discovering “rightist” truths that the rest of us knew long ago and which to a large extent are nothing more than plain fact and common sense; marked weakness with respect to science and other forms of empirical thought; prizing style over substance; and prone to exhibit, often in an enhanced form, all of the fossilized dogma, bizarre fetishes, and poor judgment of the “movement” as a whole.

Interestingly, back in 2014, Johnson reproduced one of my EGI Notes essays attacking Amren and Amren meetings. Later on, I suppose, Greggy and Sammy got a long better, so Sallis's complaints suddenly became "insanity" - a "paranoid piece of crap." Note who was it who changed based on circumstance and who has been consistent

China now has a new hypersonic nuclear-capable missile. Meanwhile, the USA uses 1960s-1980s era nuclear weapons, and our vaunted "new" GBSD ICBM will be nothing more than a souped-up Minuteman III. And many Democrats don't even think we need a ICBM leg to the triad. America is becoming a Third World country in every way. I was reading a book about American nuclear weapons history by a fellow named Goetz. He terms the "new" GBSD as an "enormous disappointment" as it just an upgraded Minuteman III (1960-70s missile), and also outlines how "new" American bombers and missile submarines are merely upgrades of old technology. He also notes an issue I have raised as a concern - the ever-diminishing yields of American nuclear bombs, to absurdly low levels. Essentially, I see the USA as undergoing de facto piecemeal unilateral nuclear disarmament. Popgun yields coupled to aging delivery systems will deter no one.

Right-Wing Populist Agenda

New laws.

What are the sort of things that should be on the agenda of right-wing populists running for office, and those who are elected?  Yes, we all expect opposition to illegal immigration and to endless “legal” immigration, opposition to “critical race theory” and “woke” culture, a protectionist economic policy and a concern for working class and middle class Americans, overturning “civil rights” laws, eliminating affirmative action, crackdown on crime, dealing with the biased media and social media, dealing with leftist bias in academia, promoting a social safety net for American citizens (and not for illegal aliens), opposition to China, etc. What if the right-wing populist is sympathetic to right-wing dissidents – as they should (indeed, must) be – what additional proposals should they put forward to protect right-wing dissident political and metapolitical activity?

I fully understand that there would be incredible resistance to these reforms. Nevertheless, it is still worth trying, not only for the enormous benefits for dissent activism in the case of success, but even the process itself would be useful for purposes of enlightenment, propaganda, recruitment, etc. The Left should be forced to defend lawfare, unfair policing, suppression of free speech, etc. Further, until such time that these reforms are implemented, they would constitute an important and attractive part of any right-wing populist political campaign.

I also understand that any law is effective only insofar as it is (fairly) enforced, and even if these reforms are actualized, there would be resistance and attempts to evade them in both spirit and letter, and to overturn them. The struggle is eternal; that is no reason not to engage in struggle.

Finally, I understand that these are complex issues, and to formulate these reforms without abrogating freedom of speech and freedom of association rights in other contexts will not be simple. I am not outlining any detailed description of the reforms - that is up to politicians, lawyers, etc. – those who are on the side of the angels, so to speak.  I am simply outlining in broad terms what should be done.

First and foremost, the Political Opinion Protection Act must be put into law. Freedom of expression must be protected from suppression from private actors, while at the same time protecting freedom of association. There are already laws on the books in some US states that at least partially protect employment rights with respect to political expression (and by further extension, there are labor laws that protect the rights of workers to comment on the workplace, which could encompass political commentary – e.g., opposing “diversity training” and engaging in any other “concerted activity”).

In general, social pricing needs to be opposed to the extent possible, again without undue infringement on freedom of association.

Lawfare - using and abusing the legal system to harass, punish, silence, and intimidate people because off their political beliefs, free speech, or other inappropriate reasons, and/or to deter others from exercising their rights for fear of suffering the same fate - needs to be made illegal. Anti-SLAPP laws can be modified and extended to cover instances where (typically right-wing) political dissidents are targeted in this manner.

Doxing also should be criminalized, and already existing anti-harassment and anti-stalking laws can be modified and extended for this purpose.

Biased policing and prosecutorial discretion also needs to be repressed, especially when it is done for political purposes. We all know the drill – violent Antifa/BLM are either not arrested, regardless of what they do, or if they are arrested, they are not prosecuted or they are given a slap on the wrist. On the other hand, if a rightist merely defends himself against leftist attacks, or simply sneezes within 50 feet of a “person of color,” then they are arrested, prosecuted, called a “domestic terrorist,” etc. There needs to be detailed accountability with respect to politically biased policing and prosecution, and this needs to be carefully codified into law. Part of this is the obligation of local, state, and the federal government to protect freedom of assembly for all lawful gatherings, and not to collaborate with leftist thugs, and/or participate in lawfare and other harassment, to prevent or shut down right-wing speeches, rallies, and other gatherings.

And, to say the least, if colored criminal gang violence is going to be excused, and not prosecuted because they are “mutual combatants,” then do the same the next time right-wing dissidents defend themselves from leftist attacks. You can’t have it both ways.

Related to the above, the “weaponizing” of the FBI, IRS, or any other government institution to suppress lawful political dissent should be criminalized.  Politically biased labelling of people as “domestic terrorists” (as mentioned above), audits and investigations, etc. need to show accountability. There needs to be oversight, and strict enforcement of non-biased use or non-use of government resources with respect to political dissent.

Other things can be thought of – the underlying idea is to eliminate, to the extent possible, social pricing, government intimidation and harassment, lawfare, etc., so as to create a freer, more open marketplace of ideas for (right-wing) dissidents. That would make activity leading to Suvorov's Law more possible.

A Real Moral Hazard

Gaslighting Greg rides again.

Laugh at this.

Race-conscious whites believe that our race as a whole is too individualistic compared to other races. We would do well to cultivate a feeling of white solidarity and brotherhood. This sentiment should be even stronger among race-conscious whites, lest we offer the world the absurd spectacle of a movement that preaches white solidarity but in practice is polarized by sectarian wedge issues…

Like questioning, every ten minutes, whether certain European-derived people are “White.”

…and petty personal rivalries.

Johnson vs. Spencer, Friberg, Griffin, Sallis, Parrott, Heimbach, etc.

But we have to be careful here. Too much solidarity can be a bad thing. 

Time for Johnson to now justify all of his bad behavior.

If you make wrongdoing safer, you’ll get more of it. 

Like sexual harassment at Alt Right meetings?

This is the meaning of “moral hazard.” Usually, moral hazards involve forcing other people to pay the costs of an individual’s bad decisions. For instance, if the government bails out lenders, they will take more risks. 

Or, if the “movement” rank-and-file keep on bailing out Quota Queen bad judgment and utter incompetence, they’ll just get more of it.

Obviously, a well-run society creates incentives to reduce rather than increase bad decisions. The same is true of a well-run movement. 

Which does not exist.

This is why we have to be careful of appeals to solidarity.

Therefore, we must tolerate Johnson’s eternal feuding.

Unconditional solidarity with the wrongdoers among us is a moral hazard.

I agree. That is why I have no solidarity with “movement” liars, gaslighters, morons, grifters, and frauds.

We should not extend unconditional solidarity to race-conscious whites who harm other members of our movement. 

Like Greg Johnson?

These harms can range from promoting bad ideas…

The entire ideological content of the recent version of Counter-Currents.

…and having bad manners…

Like defaming critics as suffering from “insanity” and calling one of your past writers a “paranoid piece of crap” on a livestream?

…— which should be called out and criticized, preferably with better ideas and better manners — to treasonous behaviors like doxing and snitching to our enemies, to outright criminal behavior. 

Does “criminal behavior” include sexual harassment or cocaine use?

If solidarity is important to us, then we should feel solidarity with the victims. 

Oh, indeed. 

Nor should we extend unconditional solidarity to whites — whether movement members or “normies” — who harm other members of our race at large. There are misanthropes in our cause who don’t “love white people.” They look upon white “normies” merely as raw material for their megalomaniac fantasies. 

Is he talking about himself here?

But they’ll still appeal to normies for white solidarity when it is convenient. Even a whiff of such sociopathic elitism is deadly for a populist movement. 

By “sociopathic elitism” do you mean gibbering about Yogi Bear, The Age of Aluminum, and The Men Who Can’t Tell Time?  Is an obsession with “Savitri Devi” any part of “sociopathic elitism?”

If solidarity is important to us, then we should reserve it for the vast majority of decent white people, not anti-social misfits who prey upon them. 

How about folks who use their children as props for fundraising?  Do they fit into that negative category?

Finally, we should not extend unconditional solidarity to whites who commit crimes against our racial enemies, for instance, terrorists like Brenton Tarrant. Even our racial enemies have basic human rights. 

Huh?

But even if you deny that — even if you profess to care only about white people….

Yes.

… — whites like Tarrant also harm our movement and our race as a whole. 

I agree, but your “movement,” in aggregate, over the many decades of failure, harms the race more.

...And when a conflict emerges between members of our cause and white well-being as a whole, solidarity with our race as a whole should win out. We must always choose the greater good. 

Yes. That is why I oppose Counter-Currents.

Now let’s apply this to some concrete questions from readers...All three of these issues are related to the question of solidarity and moral hazards.

As is the question of donating money to Counter-Currents, VDARE, American Renaissance, etc.

Let’s deal with the Fuentes question first. Nobody in the movement is above criticism for bad ideas, bad decisions, or bad character. 

Including Greg Johnson.

Suppressing criticism in the name of solidarity creates a moral hazard. It creates an atmosphere in which bad ideas, bad decisions, and bad characters flourish. But we can’t afford that. Our cause is too important, our enemies are too powerful, our ranks are too small, and our time is too short.

Indeed. That’s why Johnson is a hypocrite when he bans people from his blog who have the temerity to criticize him. But, hey. it’s just a “brand,” after all.

However, when people like Fuentes are attacked by our enemies for being courageous and effective in advocating sound ideas…

“...for being courageous and effective in advocating sound ideas." - Let me know when that occurs.

There were plenty of problems with Unite the Right. There were some terrible people, terrible ideas, and terrible optics. I know what is coming in the trial. I know that we will cringe with embarrassment at the testimony, depositions, emails, forum posts, and text messages that will be offered as evidence and broadcast to the entire world.

Johnson’s “big tent.”

The same is true of the post-Charlottesville lawfare directed at the march’s organizers and participants...we should set aside our differences — since those don’t really matter here, anyway — and we should offer them moral support, at the very least.

Hey, we could be offering them financial support, but all dem dere “D’Nations” are flowing in other directions, eh?

...It is not illegal to be evil-minded fantasists and foul-mouthed jerks. 

Yes, we know that Counter-Currents is not illegal.

It is not illegal to be an asshole. 

After all, Greg Johnson is still walking around free.

All the defendants, good and bad, are on trial simply for being white advocates. Make very clear that your support is not a blanket endorsement of the marchers — how could it be? — but simply a defense of their constitutional rights, as well as the basic principles of white racial activism, namely that white people are under attack, and we have the right to take our own side. On these points, at least, Unite the Right did nothing wrong.

All of this lip service is meaningless. Real support would have come from a sound legal infrastructure and proper finances, both of which do not exist because of the ineptness of "movement" “leaders.”

Just as solidarity with wrongdoers within our ranks creates a moral hazard, so does a lack of solidarity...Thus I wish the Charlottesville defendants the best. If they win, our cause will be a bit safer from lawfare. If they lose, we can only expect more of the same.

OK, then, if you believe that, then take all of your fundraising proceeds for the year 2021 and donate it to their legal defense. Talk is cheap. After all, it’s only money, right? Or is supporting Quota Queen financial greed a real moral hazard?

On Jeelvy and Cofnas

Odds and Ends. In all cases, emphasis added

Counter-Currents advocating violence and illegality:

Nicholas R. JeelvyMarch 21, 2021 at 1:50 am

Women, whether they’re wives or daughters, will test your patriarchal resolve until the choice is between abdicating mastery of the house or beating the woman.

You don’t have to enjoy it, but yeah, at some point, beatings may become necessary.

Is it really necessary to point out all of the problems with that, not only on its own merits as an idea, but also with respect to "optics" and the status of a Far Right website in today's sociopolitical climate? The deeper problem here is not so much Jeelvy's absolute stupidity and immaturity (already well established) but Johnson's horrifically poor judgment (I suppose that is also already well established).

I view these comments from Jeelvy to be akin to Derbyshire's comments about child porn - a line has been crossed, after which anyone who associates themselves with Counter-Currents is tainted by the stink, just like those who continued to associate with VDARE and Derbyshire after the child porn comments were also, in my opinion, similarly tainted.

Comments from Counter-Currents:

OnlookerMarch 21, 2021 at 6:41 pm

Beat women. Marry girls at 14. Women can’t give consent. Are you a satire, a la The Onion, or a chuckling troll? Please tell me you are. Otherwise you are a deeply mentally and emotionally troubled misogynist who needs serious help.

threestarsMarch 22, 2021 at 5:01 am

Jeelvy’s opinions are in the minority, even within our thing. For starters, the average marriage age in Wester [sic] Europe for the last thousand years or so was 25 and 21 respectively for men and women, with a maximum of 26 for gals in 17th cent London. Maybe backward cesspits like Macedonia were different.

threestarsMarch 21, 2021 at 3:19 am

lol

In better times, she’d already have a husband at 14

The average marriage age for men and women in the Western world was 25 and 21 respectively for the last thousand years. So it’s clear where this guy’s coming from.

outclassedMarch 22, 2021 at 9:37 am

It used to be widely known and understood that the 1350’s abuse and beat their women for various reasons including for the reasons you seem to promote in this article. Apparently this type of domestic violence is rampant in the lgbtq community as well.

Advocating to emulate this behavior appears counterintuitive to the continued mandate this site and others of the same ideological compass advance.

We are supposed to be better.

These commentators obviously haven’t figured out yet that Counter-Currents these days is all about maximizing page views and “D”Nations” (after all, “Trevor Lynch” needs your shekels to go to the movies).  If “shock jock” tactics boost page views and get sweaty Fullmoon Ancestry types in their mothers’ basements to send in money, all the better, amirite?

Look guys, it may sound egotistical, but the record shows that Sallis is typically right about most things. If you read this blog you’ll know that I identified Counter-Currents as being in decline (*), and on a Majority Rights-like downward trajectory.  I identified Jeelvy as among the worst writers I’ve ever encountered in Der Movement, and then Fullmoon Ancestry came along who, if anything, is worse. Jim Goad is simply an embarrassing disaster, whose "contributions" are for “shock jock” value only. Counter-Currents is now middlebrow at best. That Johnson wanted to recruit Roissy tells you all you need to know what the long-term strategy is there. Following up on that strategy, Johnson should get over his feuds and recruit some of his Alt Right enemies to do Beavis-and-Butthead Counter-Currents livestreams, alcohol consumption during livestreaming being mandatory; consumption of other substances can be voluntary. 

*I’m talking about quality, its trajectory, and its long-term future. I acknowledge that for now that the “Howard Stern” tactics are boosting page views and donations, but can the site's quality and seriousness be compared to how it was, say, ten years ago?  Or even five?

Whatever my disagreements with Joyce, and they are significant on certain topics, he is still orders of magnitude superior to the juvenile retards who write for Counter-Currents. Let us consider his Cofnas critiques.

Countering Cofnas, part one.

Countering Cofnas, part two.

Cofnas remarks that “four-out-of-ten invited speakers at the first American Renaissance conference in 1994 were Jewish (Lawrence Auster, Michael Levin, Rabbi Mayer Schiller, and Eugene Valberg) (American Renaissance 2017), and many of its most prominent supporters were Jewish.” He furthermore argues that this is evidence that “Jews have been overrepresented in non-anti-Semitic white nationalist movements.” But the logic here surely breaks down when given even the briefest of considerations. These speakers were not representational, but invited. Their mere presence at the conference reflects in large part the tastes, preferences, and, I would argue, anxieties of the person or persons who invited them. In this regard, I believe it’s been a longstanding position of Jared Taylor that he not be seen as anti-Semitic, and Taylor has himself on many occasions expressed hostility to anti-Semitism. In his own words, Taylor has maintained that “American Renaissance has taken an implicit position on Jews by publishing Jewish authors and inviting Jewish speakers to AR conferences.” Could his selection of these speakers have been an over-compensation to fend off accusations of American Renaissance being anti-Semitic? I believe so… All four figures are primarily concerned with race and IQ, a preoccupation of the almost explicitly philo-Semitic Jared Taylor (and one I personally find both distracting and overplayed in the context of broader civilizational collapse), rather than having ties to broader White nationalist ideology. Schiller was an almost comical inclusion given his lack of academic credentials and attachment to certain crackpot fringe ideologies.

Always remember – HBD “race realism” is a political movement designed to privilege the interests of Jews and Asians over those of Whites.

Cofnas suggests, or implies, that Jews are forced out of pro-White activism merely because they are Jews, because of irrational anti-Semitism, and that Jews are being unjustly accused of sabotaging nationalist efforts. Let’s look at the actually history of the Amren Jews, which include such low points as:

1. Promoting the idea of a multiracial, racially diverse “White separatist state” [sic!] that would include “Asians and others.”

2. Getting into a verbal altercation with David Duke at the 2006 conference, causing chaos and national and international reporting on the incident, after which Amren conferences started having all the problems with cancelled venues, etc.

3. Being involved in sending a pushy and threatening letter to Amren about “anti-Semitism.”

4. Stating that we should all accept the “racial status quo” of anti-White policies, alien immigration, affirmative action, forced integration, etc. because we cannot hope for anything better.

5. Asserting that the White public equates White nationalists with child molesters.

6. Asserting that racial preservation for its own sake (rather than for some phenotypic IQ hierarchy) is “insane.”

7. Asserting (contrary to Yockey and just about every other student of history) that Spain (and I presume Portugal as well) is "not really part of the West," while, of course. Jews, for endless centuries ghettoized and separate from host European nations, and derived from a non-Western "Magian" High Culture, are, of course, completely Western.

8. I strongly suspect, but have no direct evidence, that the “latrine flies” slur against Amren conference attendees, so enthusiastically promoted by Derbyshire, originated with one of the Amren Jews, but, again, I have no evidence and may be wrong about this one specific point.

And of course, in general, "rightist" Jews, whether associated with Amren or not,  have been prominent promoters of the HBD fraud.

Now, Jew apologists would counter-argue that it is understandable that Jewish “pro-White” activists would reject “anti-Semitic” rhetoric and would oppose Duke, and would insist that Jews are White and should be accepted in any White ethnostate. Very well. Let’s then remove #2 and #3 from the list above. Consider what remains. One example - promoting multiracialism as part of “White separatism!” While it can be understandable if a Jew insisted that Jews be part of a “White ethnostate” (although we may object), “Asians and others” is inexcusable. What about telling us we should give up and accept the “racial status quo” since we are viewed no better than child molesters and the current racial dispensation is the best that can be hoped for?  What about rejected racial preservationism that is based on race, kinship, and EGI and instead insisting on “IQ nationalism?” Why do Jews ALWAYS promote corrosive memes, even within the ranks of “race realists” and “White advocates?” Even putting aside the issue of “anti-Semitism,” Jews will ALWAYS promote diversity, multiculturalism, aracial nationalism, IQ over kinship; even in the context of an Amren meeting, they promote, in an attenuated form, the same poisons that their more obviously leftist co-ethnic brethren disseminate throughout the broader society.

Then why shouldn’t they be distrusted and forced out?  As Joyce writes:

In short, Jews have been accused of “scheming” to subvert nationalist movements because they are very often proven to be doing just that. 

Can Cofnas, or anyone else, point to one prominent Jew involved in overt pro-White activism who behaves in good faith and doesn't promote some sort of destructive agenda?  I cannot think of a single one. 

If we expand the scope to the broader Alt Right and paleoconservative Alt Lite, Gottfried may be the best of the bunch, but even he has said some dumb things over the years. If we further expand the field to include the broader Right, which encompasses Trumpian populism, then Stephen Miller would be an example of a Jew who seems to be doing the right thing. That's just one person of course, and there we are talking about mainstream politics, not the overtly pro-White "movement."

If any group is actually being unjustly forced out of pro-White activism it is White ethnics, who are actually rejected solely due to their ethnic origins; none of these peoples poison the well of discourse as did Jews like Hart, Weissberg, et al.

Countering Cofnas, part three.

About intermarriage, some time ago I analyzed ethnic intermarriage data (from Alba, etc.) and demonstrated that, compared to European American ethnic groups of similar size, Jewish Americans actually have a suppressed intermarriage rate.  Thus, if Jews intermarry at about 50%, White groups of similar size intermarry at about 70-80%.

In addition, Joyce adds:

It is also worth pointing out that in both cases, Jewish males have taken non-Jewish wives, a direction that dominates the overall picture of intermarriage in North America. Since Jewish identity is traditionally perceived as following the maternal line, it should be clear that this tendency is yet another factor mitigating intermarriage somewhat from the perspective of Jewish ethnocentrism.

I’m not interesting in Cofnas sufficiently to do a deep analysis of him and his political views, other than to note that some on the SJW Left accuse him of being on the Right.  So, instead of Cofnas specifically, let us consider a pro-White, rightist Jew in general.  Now, it can be somewhat understandable if such a person would want Jews – at least pro-White, rightist Jews – accepted on the Right, and it is also understandable that they would reject many anti-Semitic tropes. They have the right to criticizes errors and excesses in MacDonald’s work (after all, I do so here, with respect to his later HBD-Nordicist assertions), although Cofnas’ “refutations” seem to me to be mostly nitpicking and misrepresentation.

But, you know, a sincere pro-White Jew would acknowledge that MacDonald makes good points about the Jews, that much of that work is sound, at least in its general conclusions (even if some minor details are off), and that the anti-Semites have a point. Even more importantly, the Jew in question would be better served doing some positive good, rather than constantly negatively focusing on MacDonald or on anti-Semites.  

I look at Stephen Miller – there is someone doing good work on the immigration issue. If Miller has been spending time obsessing about “anti-Semites on the Right” then I must have missed it. If there are sincere Jews on Der Right, they would be better served demonstrating their sincerity through their actions on behalf of Whites and the West, rather than doing what Cofnas does. Certainly, those Jews have the right to promote the view that Jews should be considered part of the White West (I’m not saying I agree with that view, merely stating that the Jews in question are well within their right to include their own interests in their activism – why should they sacrifice themselves for other folks?). But if they believe this, if they believe that they belong, then do something of value. I don’t consider misrepresenting the role of Jews in White decline to be of value, promoting the HBD fraud is not of value, promoting multiracial “White separatism” (sic) is not of value, telling us to accept the “racial status quo” is not of value.  If you don’t want to be accused of sabotaging the White Right, then the first step is to actually stop doing it.

We are all not just imaging the war of ethnic aggression of Jews against Whites. If Cofnas is correct,we should be seeing plenty of Jews heavily involved with promoting Der Right, and with the Jews' power, influence,wealth, cunning, etc.,the Right would be doing much better than it is.  But, no. Jews are overwhelmingly on the Left, and most of those that are on the Right do more harm than good.

If pro-White Jews want to criticize someone, Hart or Weisberg would be better choices than MacDonald. The antics of the Amren Jews have convinced many activists that MacDonald's work on the Jews is 100% correct.

See this.  The parents targeted by this harassment should take proper legal actions.

Academics FIY

News.

If any of my readers are students or faculty at an American academic institution – or you know someone who is – please be aware of this (emphasis added):

• Public colleges and universities required to uphold First Amendment rights of students to access Department of Education grants

• Private colleges required to adhere to their written policies on freedom of expression to access Department of Education grants

• Religious student groups are guaranteed equal access to university resources as secular organizations as a material condition of obtaining a Department of Education grant

WASHINGTON, Sept. 9, 2020 – The Department of Education released new, final regulations today providing crucial free speech and religious liberty protections for students at our nation’s public college campuses. Institutions that violate those core rights will risk losing access to federal education grants. Put simply, the regulations require public institutions of higher education to do what they are already obligated to do: protect the First Amendment rights of their students.

The new regulations also require from private institutions what many courts already require: that the institutions comply with their stated institutional policies regarding freedom of speech and academic freedom. If a court finds that a private institution violated its policies, it risks losing access to Department of Education grants.

Under the new rules, religious student organizations must also have equal access to the benefits colleges afford to recognized secular organizations. This means that public institutions of education may no longer discriminate against religious student organizations by denying them access to campus facilities or student fee money available to secular student organizations “because of the religious student organization’s beliefs, practices, policies, speech, membership standards, or leadership standards, which are informed by sincerely held religious beliefs.”

“Too many institutions violate student and faculty free speech rights as a matter of course,” said FIRE Legislative and Policy Director Joe Cohn. “Hopefully, the additional risk of losing federal grant money will encourage them to rethink their practices.” 

FIRE is cautiously optimistic about the new regulations, which have the potential to incentivize institutional respect for and attention to core civil liberties. However, these regulations are not without risk. Because institutions risk losing access to federal grants if they lose a First Amendment lawsuit, there is a possibility that institutions will change the way they litigate those lawsuits. It may also affect the way judges decide First Amendment cases, knowing that large federal grants may be at stake.

“It is not too much to ask of our nation’s colleges and universities that they follow the First Amendment or keep their own free speech promises if they wish to receive federal grant money,” said FIRE Executive Director Robert Shibley. “As always, FIRE stands ready to assist any institution wishing to join those who already ensure that their policies protect free speech.”

CONTACT:

Daniel Burnett, Assistant Director of Communications, FIRE: 215-717-3473; media@thefire.org

There would seem to be increased room for maneuver for pro-White democratic multiculturalism here.

Of course, an incoming Harris administration (with a diaper-wearing Biden safely drooling in a corner) would likely reverse all of this.  So, gee, I guess you have a few months…

Of related interest.

A New Constitutional Amendment

And other news.

In response to the Negro lunacy described here - an “anti-racism” constitutional amendment that would require a radical interpretation of the First Amendment, making that leading article of the Bill of Rights meaningless - I propose my own constitutional amendment.

This new constitutional amendment would have two parts.  First, it would make my proposal of the Political Opinion Protection Act (POPA) part of the US Constitution. Hence (clause one):

Political and social opinions, beliefs, and ideologies, and the adherence and promotion thereof, now define a protected class of individuals, against whom business and institutions, private or public, cannot discriminate in employment or in the provision of services.  The only exception is where the opinions, beliefs, and ideologies are directly and overtly incompatible with the core mission of the business or institution.

That can be worded better by constitutional lawyers so as to optimally clarify the "core mission" exception and to be optimally compatible with clause two (below). Clause one would extend the First Amendment from the purely governmental public sphere to the private sphere, essentially moving in the opposite direction of the aforementioned Negro lunacy.  If you read the initial POPA post, linked to above, you will see a careful definition of what is, and what is not, a "core mission." The balance between free speech and free association needs to be carefully maintained.

To further move in this opposite of the Negro lunacy, and to clarify issues relating POPA to freedom of association, the second part (clause two) of the new constitutional amendment would focus on extending freedom of association, just as the first part extends freedom of speech.

Thus (clause two):

No law shall be enforced that restricts freedom of association in any way whatsoever, with the exception that freedom of association will not be construed to violate the free speech rights as defined in clause one, with the "core mission" exceptions of clause one, which are consistent with clause two, clearly defined.

Again, it can be better worded; I am here merely expressing the underlying objective. Thus, the two clauses need to be carefully defined so that there is absolute freedom of speech except where that interferes with a narrowly defined area of freedom of association, and that there is absolute freedom of association except where such violates free speech, the proviso being that there are narrow exceptions where freedom of association trumps free speech.

In this sense, freedom of association is at a higher level than free speech, but only in narrowly defined circumstances where the freedom of association is an inherent property ("core mission") of the entity that asserts the primacy of free association.  Again, this all needs to be formulated in such a way that the Left does not use each clause to violate the other.  The two clauses need to be complimentary, not antagonistic.

The main objective is broaden and extend freedom, striking a balance between expanded freedom of speech and expanded freedom of association, and negotiating the boundaries where the two expanded freedoms may come into conflict. In a so-called “democracy," freedom should be protected and, when in doubt, expanded. Totalitarian thought control is incompatible with the West, which is why it is so popular among those whose backgrounds are outside of our civilization.

It needs to be said as well that the action of Jack Dorsey in supporting the Negro lunacy is a perfect example of “woke capital” and its corrosive power in modern society.  In my opinion, according to my standards, Dorsey is a monster.

Other news:

Re-read this. Let’s consider the relatively recent (past 25 years or so) history of Jews in Der Movement:

• Promoting a multiracial “White separatist state” that not only includes Jews, but also “Asians and others” – essentially all groups except for Blacks. The Jewish individual who promoted this now says we should not have any sort of “White state” - we must now also include “conservative Blacks.”
• The “racial status quo” of around 15 years ago was the best we can have and we should support the racial status quo of a multiracial society, including affirmative action and other anti-White policies.
• Racial preservationism for its own sake is insane. We can only preserve groups based on a hierarchy of traits.
• We should support HBD instead of kinship-based racialism, concentrated on “high IQ” that privileges Jews and Asians.
• Mass alien immigration, particularly Hispanic immigration, is not a problem; indeed, we should welcome Hispanic immigration.
• Northeast Asians are genetically more similar to Europeans than to Southeast Asians - an absurd falsehood already disproven by population genetics at the time it was written.
• I also suspect that the person who told Derbyshire that Amren conference attendees are “latrine flies” was also a Jew (likely one of the above), although unfortunately I have no evidence to support that hypothesis.
• And now we have the "Furlong" mendacity discussed here recently.

Jews have an instinctive tropism toward always supporting diversity and multiracialism, even within the scope of Far Right activism.  Jews have an instinctive aversion to homogeneous White societies; while for us a White ethnostate is a dream, for Jews it is a nightmare.  The reason is obvious – Jews are a different people with different interests, compared to European-derived Whites. Jews have a “racial memory” of “persecution” in all-White societies and they will never be comfortable in such societies and they will always attempt to subvert White homogeneity. Should such a people, with a millennia-long history of nation-wrecking, be given free access to the “movement?”

I essentially agree with this analysis, a mostly astute “take-down” of Johnson’s moronic petty nationalism; however, if the author of this piece is the same idiot shilling for “civic nationalism” and “high IQ immigration” on Twitter, then he’s just as bad as Johnson is.

None Dare Call It Treason

None except for Sallis.

Read this.  What else do you expect from the Unz HBD site?  What do you expect from a site that blames The China Plague on “an American bioweapon,” shills for China, has as its owner a Jewish supporter of Hispanic Reconquista, and which promotes Nordicism designed to divide Whites against each other for the benefit of Jews and Asians?

That dumb Unz piece misses the entire point.  The ultimate issue is not about crime or IQ or whatever – it’s about the demographic and cultural displacement of Whites.  It is about EGI and civilization, not crime statistics and PISA scores.  It is about genetic kinship and cultural affinity, not a ranking of group traits according to scales designed to suit the interests of wealthy Levantines. Whites should support White interests precisely because they are White, not because of what turds like Unz or Lynn or Rushton or Sailer or Dutton or any of them say about particular traits of Whites vs. those of others. Whites should not oppose immigration of (non-White) Hispanics or Asians because of some ranked traits but precisely because those groups are not White; they are not us. How difficult can that be to understand? And can we be surprised that some sort of HBD Spencerite “racialist” goes groveling to Unz with mea culpas?  And that is why White HBDers are a problem – they judge groups based on proximate measures rather than ultimate. So, to them, Hispanics are evaluated based upon whether or not they rioted a lot recently, rather than on Hispanics' relative genetic (and cultural) distance from European-Americans. From a racialist viewpoint that is a disaster, and it is inevitable that weak-minded fools who base their worldview on HBD are going to turn against WN, because at the most fundamental basis HBD and WN are essentially incompatible.

To better understand the depths of Unzian Middle Eastern mendacity, consider the argument there – that WN is “politically bankrupt” because it focuses on immigration – an existential issue for White survival that White people actually DO care about, as demonstrating by opinion polling and by the election of Trump in 2016 – instead of, you know, focusing on IQ scores and Durocherian Nordicism, that White folks not only care zero about, but would consider strange, disconnected to their interests, and the province of cranks and autistic weirdos.  Why is it that members of the tribe ALWAYS promote memes to Whites that are racially destructive?  They just can’t help themselves, can they? EVERY. SINGLE. TIME.

And, finally, that is why any “White nationalists” – like Johnson and Durocher – who write for Unz are despicable traitors.  Neither of them needs to write for Unz (of course, no one does in fact).  Johnson has his own Counter-Currents site.  Durocher has written for a variety of other sites in the past and nothing stops him from starting an independent blog (possible name: The Clouseau Chronicles).  No, they choose to support and enable a Jew who attacks WN and supports non-White immigration. EGI Notes, on the other hand, is steadfast in its opposition to Unz. Or should I say (((Unz)))?

Then we have those veteran WN 1.0 heroes, who have made their career opposing Jewish power (or pretending to do so), but who cannot utter a single word against HBD, Unz, or any of the White traitors who sell out their race for Unzian “race realism.”  I suppose such utterances would not be “politically” expedient.  Another example of what the likes of Gunther, Grant, and Stoddard would consider the sublimely honorable nobility of Nordic Man.

It is a matter of judgment and character.

Behold Egalism (emphasis added):

…a system called egalism. The government provides all the necessities of life, and in exchange the people work only thirteen hours each week. (All other work is performed by machines or by outside contractors--at great price.) The remainder of their time is spent in the leisurely pursuit of pleasure: games, sport, sex…Egalism requires sacrifices, though. The people are crowded onto one small island called Arrabus; the vast continents of Wyst are sparsely populated wilderness. The government provides all food, but the only choices available are three bland concoctions: gruff, deedle, and wobbly. Arrabins go to great lengths to get taste of real food, which they call bonter. People live in colossal featureless apartment blocks, in tiny rooms with randomly assigned roommates. Personal possessions are scarce, and frequently stolen (or snerged as the Arrabins say.) The egal ideal is absolute equality between persons, so individualism is stifled. Even the differences between sexes are suppressed as much as possible. Making oneself too appealing to the opposite sex is sexivation, and is socially discouraged…it is clear that egalism is a failed experiment. The machines that keep Arrabus running are breaking down. The Arrabins, working only thirteen hours a day at menial jobs, are not able to effect repairs, and Arrabin exports can no longer cover the cost of hiring outside contractors.

It is also interesting that the Arrabins are extremely anti-immigration, as they claim they cannot maintain their social system with the mass influx of immigrant parasites who want to take advantage of it.  I’m sure Unz would object, as long as the immigrants are Hispanic or Asian.

The following is an Arrabin female addressing an outworlder male in that book: “We’ll copulate if you like; you can show me some new and amusing antics.”

Another Arrabin female is described thus: “…a blonde, kitten-faced girl with small feet and a ripe figure displayed almost to the point of sexivation…”

If such exemplified Vance’s own preferences, then obviously he was not an HBDer.  Or an Alt Right flirter.  Or the keynote speaker at an Alt Right meeting.  Jack was not suitable for the Mannerbund.

Oh, that Jack Vance…

Let’s ignore the works of Gene Wolfe and Jack Vance, and the lessons therein about human behavior and societies, and instead crack open our copy of Tolkien in our hobbit hole.  The battle for Middle Earth begins!  That’ll be complete with Unz telling us that opposing orcs is “politically bankrupt,” and Durocher busily using calipers to compare the cephalic indices of northern vs. southern hobbits.

Of interest.  Why is it that the anti-White system merely provokes protests to become even more anti-White, rather than the opposite.  A first in history – in which an oppressed population riots in favor of more oppression.  High trust northern hunter gatherers!

It is abduction.  The problem, you see, is that the Right, as an empty vessel, lacks the legal infrastructure to pursue this to its logical conclusion.  If such an infrastructure existed, then, pooling together a number of like cases, and assuming properly litigious clients, the local government could be sued for allowing the civil rights of the drivers to be violated, and for failing to enforce the law (as well as the anarcho-tyranny of politically-motivated selective prosecution); further, the protestors themselves, once identified via social media and other mechanisms (starting with “Seun”), can also sued. There’s also probably a RICO criminal case or two there if you sift around aggressively enough – but that of course requires a sympathetic district attorney.

In any case, it is quite clear that legal room for maneuver exists – IF the Right were anything other than a useless grift.

Christianity must be destroyed.

Consider this.

After spending most of my 20s in Scandinavia, I noticed that white Europeans were also becoming minorities in certain areas of Western Europe. This was one of the reasons why I decided to relocate to Eastern Europe for the past two years.

That’s it with these Herrenvolk.  Their homelands have been destroyed by their own feckless co-ethnics, so time to move into someone else’s lands.  Ethnonationalism!  What hypocrites.  Let’s hear more from the Quota Queens how “Poles should not be living in Western Europe.”  Indeed, they’ll write that article as soon as they finish screwing that Polish girl in Warsaw.  Ethnonationalism!

Remember my prediction for 2020:

Here's a very easy prediction for 2020: Expect more outrageous hypocrisy from Counter-Currents.

Counter-Currents: The absolute worst, most outrageously hypocritical Far Right site on the Internet. Oh yes, let’s preach the wonders of “ethnonationalism” and “petty nationalism” while engaging in ethnosupremacist ethnoimperialism, living in the nations of other peoples and taking their women.

A Counter-Currents “writer” whines:

My nephew suffered the most from her lackadaisical parenting. He became very spoiled from eating cheap calorie fast food. The breadth of his nutritional intake came from chicken nuggets, French fries, pepperonis, be they on a pizza or straight out of a package, and hotdogs. His grandmother (my mom) had to make sure her freezer was always stocked with the same garbage. It was so bad that he literally refused fruit, vegetables, soups, salads, or even meat that wasn’t served out of a frozen cardboard box.

Hey!  With the exception of the French fries and pizza crust, that sounds a lot like the carnivore diet promoted by the great and good Jef Costello.  So what’s the problem?  Just substitute the fries and crusts with more chicken nuggets and hot dogs and you’re all set! After all, Eskimos eat whale meat, so…chow down, son!  Hopefully you won’t get apoplexy sitting on the toilet.  Fiber?  You don’t need no stinkin’ fiber!