Movement Money Pit

The tin cup is overflowing.  In all cases, emphasis added.

See this; I friend of this blog forwarded that very interesting article.  Let us consider together. I will assume that all of the information listed below, and the tax form information from which it is derived, is accurate; if it is not, the groups mentioned should correct it. The ProPublica not-for-profit database is currently not updated with this information. I will first fisk the article and then make my main argument at the end.

For the second year in a row, the right wing’s favorite dark money donation vehicle has given an unprecedented sum to a notorious white nationalist hate group.

Putting aside the breathless, inflammatory verbiage (“dark money, notorious, hate”), the basic problem here is that most of the groups in question are NOT “white nationalist” but instead are “yellow supremacist” HBD “race realist” and/or immigration restriction-minded civic nationalist. Now, even though the groups in question are not White nationalist, they all are definitely part of Der Movement; note that I have been chronicling how Der Movement has been abandoning genuine, authentic White nationalism in favor of the emerging HBD-Nordicist-ethnonationalist-Amnat alliance that centers on the ideologies promoted by those non-WN “movement” groups. So there is no inconsistency in stating that they are not White nationalist but are part of Der Movement.

New tax records obtained by the Center for Media and Democracy (CMD) reveal that nonprofit charity DonorsTrust bankrolled the New Century Foundation—an alias for American Renaissance, a white nationalist organization led by Jared Taylor—with $600,000 in 2020.

Consider that very carefully the next time Amren rattles the tin cup.

That amount exceeds the New Century Foundation’s total annual revenue in any year since 2010.

They’re moving on up.

American Renaissance, which is designated by the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) as a white nationalist hate group, is Taylor’s online magazine and is known for creating the black-on-white crime myth…

It’s not a myth. It is based on official statistics, for example, those from the FBI.

…which has inspired terrorists including Dylann Roof to commit mass murder.

Nonsense.

“You don’t exactly need a PhD to understand why Jared Taylor is a white nationalist”…

I have a PhD, and I understand that Jared Taylor is NOT a White nationalist – he self-identifies as a “White advocate” and a “race realist” (i.e., a HBDer) and he has suggested that some people may view Amren as “yellow supremacist.” Amren conferences have featured Jews, Asian, and race mixers as speakers. I am a White nationalist, not Taylor.

…said Michael Edison Hayden, a senior investigative reporter and spokesperson for the SPLC. “He believes that Black people are less intelligent, less empathetic, and less human than white people. 

Well, that’s true, isn’t it?

He will tell you that with his own words and does so every day on his website, which is so grotesquely and openly racist I sometimes feel nauseated reading it.”

If by “openly racist” you mean animus against White ethnics, then yes, I’ve chronicled Amren attacks against (Southern) Italians, Hungarians, and Romanians at EGI Notes. Other than that, Amren is extremely mild, milquetoast, milksop stuff.  If it is nauseating, it is because the pro-Jewish and pro-Asian attitudes extant there. And if this idiot gets sickened by reading the weak sauce of Amren, then he’d probably keel over and drop dead after reading EGI Notes.

DonorsTrust is a fund associated with the Kochs, the Mercers, and other right-wing billionaire families. It is a donor-advised fund sponsor, meaning that it manages individual charitable accounts for its clients for a fee. These clients, who can hide their identities from the public by using DonorsTrust, “advise” DonorsTrust about where the money should go, but the organization has total legal authority to decide which organizations will receive funding.

They can give their money where they damn please. I don’t like the Quota Queens wasting money that could be used better elsewhere, but there’s no accounting for donor taste.

In 2020, DonorsTrust also gave $75,000 to the foundation behind the prominent white nationalist hate group VDARE, the tax records show. 

Stupid and factually incorrect breathless soyboy posturing. VDARE may be prominent in Der Movement but it is NOT “white nationalist” nor does it promote “hate.” If only that characterization was true, then I could support VDARE’s mission, but it is not true.

The previous year, as CMD first reported, DonorsTrust gave over $1.5 million to the VDARE Foundation. 

Well, there’s a lot of “executive compensation” needed there, no doubt.

The amount was far greater than the group’s previous annual revenue record and likely helped VDARE purchase a castle in West Virginia. 

So that’s where the money came from?

In total, VDARE took in a whopping $4.3 million in 2019, as CMD and the SPLC reported.

Remember that the next time Der Movement cries poverty, and tells you they can’t build a legal infrastructure because of financial reasons.

VDARE, led by Peter Brimelow, promotes the white genocide conspiracy theory…

It is not a conspiracy. Demographic change, which is celebrated by the Left, is an objective fact.

…a central tenet of white nationalism…

Brimelow is NOT a White nationalist.  He is an immigration restrictionist civic nationalist.  That is the agenda of VDARE, along with HBD “race realism.”

…has published apologia for white nationalist terrorists..

Nonsense.

…and regularly churns out anti-immigrant propaganda. 

So what? Immigration can legitimately be challenged. By the way, Brimelow was an immigrant, and Derbyshire was an illegal alien immigrant.  

“There’s ethnic specialization in crime,” said Brimelow at a 2017 event hosted by American Renaissance, “and Hispanics do specialize in rape, particularly of children. They’re very prone to it, compared to other groups.”

That’s true, isn’t it?

As the American conservative movement, inspired by the racism and conspiracy theories of former president Donald Trump…

If Trump is a “racist” then he’s one against White people, having taken their votes and doing nothing to help them, not even mentioning them as a group in any public address or comment, while foaming at the mouth about how much he and his administration helped every group but Whites.  And most of the “conspiracy theories” have turned out to be, likely, true.

…moves further and further to the right…

Yes, that “conservative movement,” and the GOP that serves as its vehicle, may even reach the point it was in the 1950s, under that radical Nazi Dwight Eisenhower and his Operation Wetback.  Truth is, the “American conservative movement” (sic), just like American society as a whole, has been moving left for decades. Any correction to that, however minor, is to be welcomed.

DonorsTrust has dramatically increased its funding of white nationalist hate groups. 

Name one such group, not including groups whose ideology contradicts authentic White nationalism.

Before 2019, the charity had not donated to such groups, although for some time it has been financing anti-Muslim, anti-immigrant, and anti-LGBTQ hate groups. 

Is the SPLC an anti-White hate group?

As CMD reported, the trend continued in 2020: DonorsTrust doled out large sums to the Center for Security Policy ($1.8 million), the David Horowitz Freedom Center (nearly $200,000), and the Pacific Justice Institute ($74,000), among other extremist organizations.

So, anyone to the right of you is an “extremist” peddling “hate.” Did you ever stop to consider that one reason that DonorsTrust has expanded its donations to groups you despise is that it is a response to the hateful leftist extremism of people like you, and of the SPLC?

DonorsTrust did not immediately respond to an emailed request for comment.

They are under no obligation to answer to the likes of you.

“DonorsTrust deserves all the scrutiny it can get for funding American Renaissance,” said SPLC’s Hayden. “

How about those who donate to the SPLC?  What kind of “scrutiny” do they “deserve?”

All Americans, regardless of race…

Lie. Don't speak for me, scumbag.

…suffer immensely when financial institutions lift up those who deem Black people to be subhuman…

Why should Americans suffer by truth being funded?  Doesn’t truth set you free?  I for one suffer by having to live among subhuman Blacks.

… It sets our country back by decades.”

Quite the opposite.  The problem is not the agenda Hayden fantasizes about.  If that agenda was actually being funded, and good work was being done with that money, then that would be beautiful. Unfortunately, what we have instead is money going to inept “race realist” and civic nationalist Quota Queens.

Other donor-advised fund sponsors finance white nationalist hate groups, but not nearly as generously as DonorsTrust. Some of the biggest charities in the nation have recently given money to the New Century Foundation, the VDARE Foundation, and other white nationalist organizations.

Again, you mendacious, lying, gaslighting, dishonest piece of utter filth, the New Century Foundation and the VDARE Foundation are NOT “white nationalist organizations.” In my opinion, what they stand for is antithetical to genuine White nationalism.

The National Philanthropic Trust donated to these two groups for the first time in 2020, giving $50,000 each to the New Century Foundation and the VDARE Foundation. Through a spokesperson, the trust evaded responsibility for its donations.

They are not obligated to explain their donations to the likes of you.

Our donors recommend grants that support a variety of organizations, all in good standing with the IRS, which may be on differing sides of a cause. NPT does not take a position on which causes our donors support however we carefully follow strict due diligence procedures to ensure compliance with all applicable laws and regulations. In accordance with NPT policy, we suspend grants to charities under investigation by any regulatory body that calls into question an organization’s ability to carry out a charitable mission.

That’s reasonable.

Other recent funders of white nationalist hate groups include the donors-advised fund sponsors linked to the Fidelity, Schwab, and Vanguard investment firms.

Interesting.  Why are they donating?  There are many possibilities here, some good, some not. Buying “insurance” in case things get “hot?” Co-opting genuine White nationalism by funding its intra-“movement” opposition?  A response to being shocked by the behavior of the Left over the past few years?  Who knows?

The people who should be interested in all of this is not hysterical leftists, but pro-White activists, who give their hard-earned money for “D’Nations” and who probably don’t know how well off the recipients of those donations are, and would be outraged by how little is being accomplished by all the money received.

I need to get in this racket; when I retire, I need to get on the “movement” gravy train!  Shilling for shekels!  Look at the chart at the end of the article.  Where’s my money?  My tin cup is empty. Oh the agony!

Now comes my main message, which is all 100% consistent with everything I have been writing about Der Movement and its finances over the last few years.  Der Movement loves to cry poverty, rattle the tin cup for “D’Nations,” engage in constant fundraising, excuse their endless failures by claiming a lack of funds and other resources, but, as you can see, in reality, they are doing quite well financially. They are certainly doing better than any of us, and certainly doing better than the masses of activists, some of whom who are not doing well, who shell out the shekels to pad Der Movement’s overflowing coffers.

The problem is not that Der Movement is making big money.  The problem is that they are making big money while:

• Constantly shilling for “D’Nations” from rank-and-file activists and putting forth the façade of being struggling, deplatformed, and defunded victims fighting a System in which virtually everyone is against them.
• Promoting ideologies that are hostile to, and in competition with, the pan-European White nationalism that I espouse.
• Accomplishing little of value for pro-White activism as a whole, taking resources away from potential activities that could be of value, while, in some cases, getting comfy “executive compensations” for doing things other people do for nothing.

There are serious consequences for this waste of money,  Consider the recent Unite the Right civil suit decision. The "movement" lacks an effective legal infrastructure in part because the financial resources are not available - and yet the Quota Queens are taking in "unprecedented sums" of money.  Do you see the problem?  

The Burial of American White Nationalism

More evidence supporting my analysis.

Let’s consider my essay on The Death of American White Nationalism. Many of the points made in that essay have been supported by evidence from the latest Amren conference.  And now we have a summary of that conference from an attendee, a summary that presents more evidence supporting my thesis – a thesis even further supported by various other portents observed in the “movement.”

The signs and portents of the death of American White nationalism are all around you. Lawrence and Affirmative Right attack the very foundations of a rational, scientific White nationalism.  

We see that continues.

And if you talk about the Jews, well, that's the "Jewpill" and no long acceptable in the brave new world of today's "activism."

Counter-Currents promotes multiracialism and tries to redefine White nationalism as simply a grouping of different traditional European ethnic nationalisms.  Non-Whites are not only valued commentators at FOX News – which is expected from cuckservatives – but in Der Movement itself (e.g., Lipton Matthews, Michelle Malkin, Amren Jews). 

Apart from Jews – who Taylor considers to be White (or HuWhite) – was there ever a non-White Amren speaker before Malkin? I don’t recall anyone. Am I missing anyone? Thus, we should not underestimate the turning point of Malkin’s appearance. Who is next? Lipton Matthews? I suppose that we need to give credit to the Asiaphile HBDers – by being patient and persistent over time they’ve wrecked kinship-based White racial nationalism. 

When Amren focuses on HBD and harps about Asian superiority and invites Jews, Filipinas, and race-mixers as honored speakers, then White nationalism dies. 

As we see happening.

Out with the old, in with the new – Color, Color everywhere.  “Rosie and the kids!”  After all, the scorn for WN 1.0 and the embrace of WN 2.0 or WN 3.0 was a signal that the Quota Queens were jettisoning actual White nationalism for something fundamentally different.

And so Malkin speaks at Amren.

And so we are left with an utterly transformed "movement." The HBD poison was allowed in. Everything else – the Alt Right fiasco, traditionalist cul-de-sacs, the multiracial Alt Lite-Amnat-American First Trumpian “big tent,” obsessions with mainstreaming…

I note that Pilleater claims that “Nick Fuentes has power over Amren” and was instrumental in getting Malkin invited. This is all consistent with my “The Death of American White Nationalism” essay.  As is the re-emergence of “The American Freedom Party” and what Pilleater calls the “shift” of attitude of Amren. According to Pilleater, Taylor claims that Amren is "the leading dissident right voice" - with Counter-Currents, VDARE, and TOO being "little orbiters." Not much humility there. I note that according to ProPublica the "orbiter" VDARE far outstrips Amren in fundraising. However, putting aside the issue of cash flow (always a prime consideration for the Quota Queens), if we agree that Amren is “the leading dissident right voice" then the choices being made by Amren, very evident at their latest conference, will help determine the direction of the American “movement” – a direction moving toward multiracial civic nationalism, Asians everywhere, Amnats on the march, anti-vaxx hysteria being more of a concern than forced racial integration, etc.

What we have instead of genuine American White nationalism is HBD race realism, multiracial right-wing populist conservatism, Trump worship, traditionalism, conspiracy theorizing, “We’re all God’s Children” Christianity, lunatic fringe Nordicism and ethnic fetishism – everything and anything except good old basic (pan-European) White racial nationalism.

Indeed, all we need is a few “tweaks” to existing law and we can all enjoy a warm and cozy multiracial America.

Mr. Hood also said that he sees little prospect for civic nationalism unless two conditions are met: the abolition of racial preferences and the enforcement of all immigration laws.

Thus, multiracial civic nationalism is A-OK with Hood and Amren as long as affirmative action is banned (presumably only in the broader society but not in the “movement”) and we have enforcement of immigration laws.  That’s it – the new “White nationalism” conflates to ending racial quotas and “building the wall.”

Thus, everyone of good will who wants humanity to advance rather than degenerate has an interest in helping our struggle.

Malkin for example.  Why not Lipton Matthews?  

See this.

…the Left has unwittingly purged the Dissident Right of its most unsavory element; and make no mistake about it, the purging of this unsavory element eventually would have had to be done, anyway…The Left has done a favor to our movement by removing this unsavory element. This goes a long way toward explaining why the recent American Renaissance convention was so pleasant and why there were so few protesters present. It also demonstrates the significance of Michelle Malkin’s speech at AmRen.

Oh, indeed. Let us consider together. If Malkin was sincere in being pro-White, it seems to me she could be more useful to the cause by being in the mainstream, such as being a Tucker Carlson-like commentator. If the argument is that having non-Whites around makes the “movement” more palatable for sensitive White normies then that is not only ideologically suspect (why do we need to depend on Colored approval?) but practically questionable. After all, having Coloreds in the Alt Lite didn’t help them in any way. So, what’s the agenda? I suspect that the real reason Malkin is being brought in, and similar things taking place, is to purge the “movement" of hardcore Whites-only “ourselves alone” WNs, and to co-opt those activists who remain by making them choose to accept Asians, etc. To put it bluntly, Malkin is Nutzi repellant. And by “Nutzi” in this context I mean hardcore WNs, including myself. This is all consistent with my analysis of how American White nationalism is being destroyed.

A Counter-Currents commentator responds to Jim Goad's latest screed:

Victor HendersonNovember 22, 2021 at 11:20 am

Man stop defending Asians, many of them hate white people. They play a game and play many dumb white as usual. Because many sadly insecure white nationalist have a weakness for Asian women I am noticing a lot ‘’pandering’’ towards Asians. The Asians have a very very deep hatred for the West, Koreans, Japanese, Chinese, Filipinos etc. Ask Canadians, Australians, New Zealanders they understand the real menace of the Yellow Peril.

Vic, if you want realism about Asians, come to EGI Notes and Ted Sallis Gab. If you stay in Der Movement, you'll soon find an Asiatrix in your bedroom screaming at you, and what she'll be saying is not that her name is "Ben Dover." Cut the cord, leave Counter-Currents. What this Henderson fellow is complaining about is the very thing that this post is about - the "movement" is no longer about White nationalism or even White advocacy, but instead is nothing more or less than Asian-loving "race realism."

Indeed:

DarkPlatoNovember 22, 2021 at 7:58 am

I can’t figure out if the left or right is crazier.

American White nationalism is DEAD.

It’s time to bury the corpse.

Very Happy Penguins Indeed

Money, money, money, must be funny...

The following is all from publicly accessible sites, open information, no secrets, nothing private or hidden, just something that can be found in about 60 seconds of searching online.

Yet another publicly available example - previously chronicled in detail here - of Hood’s lying about “little money” in the “movement” – the records of The VDARE Foundation.

Brimelow’s 2017 W-2 compensation - $148,303.  That’s a happy penguin indeed!  No that’s not a digital misprint - $148,303 in one year for the “chairman” of a “foundation” whose purpose is running a website (self-described accomplishment for 2017 from the tax form: CREATE AND MANAGE INTERNET PUBLICATION), in other words,  for doing what other people do for free, for absolutely nothing. Was VDARE worth that $148,303 compensation for Brimelow?  

Brimelow's 2018 W-2 compensation - $181,675.  Once again: CREATE AND MANAGE INTERNET PUBLICATION.  Total revenue - $698,157. Total expenses - $681,098.

Wait...it gets better!  VDARE's 2019 filing. Look at that 2019 filing, just look at it. $4,345,643 total income. And...$345,364 "executive compensation" for Brimelow!

$345,364!

Once again: CREATE AND MANAGE INTERNET PUBLICATION. 

And worse - the "internet publication" is a civic nationalist, HBD endeavor, not even an actual WN production. Does the writing of Sailer, Derbyshire, and Welton actually contribute anything positive to our goals?

Keep all of that in mind the next time VDARE has a "fundraiser" and the next time some Der Movement Quota Queen LIAR complains that "the movement needs more money." How about Der Right more effectively uses the money it does have? For godssakes...$345,364!

And yet Hood and others tell us that their beloved "movement" has "no money."  Aren't you rank-and-file suckers tired of being lied to?

People may object to my negative categorization of Quota Queens as constantly money-grubbing; after all, they’ll argue that these people could have made more money engaging in some “normie” career outside of the “movement.” I respond as follows. With respect to those “movement” heroes who have some ability, particularly those who had careers before becoming full-time activists, it is likely that at the beginning they were sincere, authentic activists.  But, at some point, after failure and failure, after coming across their own limitations and the cuckiness and overall uselessness of Whites, they essentially gave up hope of actually winning and instead started to focus on themselves. They’ve essentially set themselves outside any chance of having, or renewing, a normie career, so to salvage their position, they have to sponge off of their supporters. On the other hand, the more limited individuals, those that have never done anything other than being "activists," essentially have little choice but to grift, being unable to do much else and/or it is much easier to grift than to actually work.

I have no problem with full-time activists getting lots of money if they earn it. For all I care, a productive leader who significantly advances the interests of our people, in a manner that no one else does, a unique world historical leader, can receive a seven figure compensation. No problem. But when hundreds of thousands of dollars are flushed down the toilet to people doing what others do for nothing, then I have a problem. Why I seem to be the only person on the Far Right bothered by this is as disturbing, or even more disturbing, than the issue itself. The rank-and-file are too passive.

But, consider - the rank-and-file of today is likely not the same as that of the past. If you look at the people commenting on "movement" blogs, there seems to be a lot of "churn" in Der Movement. True, people may be using multiple pseudonyms, or switching pseudonyms, but I do believe that for the most case the different people commenting are in fact different people. So, it may be that rank-and-file get disgusted and drop out and are replaced by a new peanut gallery.  So, the passivity of the rank-and-file may not be so much that they just sit around endlessly taking all of this nonsense, but that they drop out after several years instead of fighting for a better "movement."  

And imagine if Der Movement was able to retain each iteration of the rank-and-file - the growth would be impressive. But, no, the Quota Queens ruin everything.  But they'll always ask for more money - endless fundraising. The next time some "movement" gaslighter complains that there's " no money" for a legal defense infrastructure or some other useful project, remember this EGI Notes post.

One also has to wonder how much of these financial windfalls are at least in part due to the Der Movement Ethnic Affirmative Action Program that Johnson denies exists.  Can you imagine some wop or hunkie getting $345,364 for similar "activism?"  No. Only the Herrenvolk are so blessed.

Very Happy Penguins Indeed!

In Der News, 4/12/21

In all cases, emphasis added.

People recognize the crypsis:

Michael Lunburg

Lillo keeps saying he is Sicilian, but he is in fact Colombian and was adopted by an Italian family.

Ruby

EXACTLY!  That's what I thought, his bio says that!  SO, what's the deal, another ' fabrication'???   I'm half Italian...my gr.mother is from Rome.

'We' don't appreciate impersonates.  So, what's his game?   Being adopted is not what his real biological background is.

Freddy Calipari

True I thought the same thing.

K B

Like Snooki lol She’s Chilean but adopted by an Italian family. She considers herself Italian.

These South Americans should stop stealing other people’s ethnic identities. I can understand where racially mixed Hispanics want to pretend that they are European, but it is unacceptable. 

See this.

Snooki was born in Santiago, Chile. She was adopted when she was six months old and was raised by Italian-American parents Andy and Helen Polizzi. Snooki has taken two DNA tests to determine her genetic background. In 2014, the first DNA test stated her genetic background is: Romani, Iberian, South Asian, East Asian, Middle Eastern, and Jewish…she took another DNA test, this time with 23andMe which stated that she was 59.5% Native Chilean and 31.2% European…

Although I have my reservations about these tests, still, they have some utility when used in a relative, comparative fashion. So, it’s not so much that you should take the findings at exact face value to the percentage point (obviously, you should not), but you can compare the profiles between groups, or between individuals and groups, and ascertain if the profiles (such as they are) are relatively similar. The genetic profile of Snooki is not in any way similar to that of Italians. We can assume that Lillo would also be genetically non-Italian, and instead fall within the range consistent with what is found with Columbians. For such people to try to pass themselves off as Italian is a form of ethnic defamation.

Another view of Manchin.

See this. VDARE’s performance is made even worse, in a relative fashion, by considering how much money they take in.

See this, Ted Sallis again mentioned positively in that post (contrast that to Johnson’s defamatory negativism).  An interesting excerpt about Der Movement:

There needs to be more of a balance between the seriousness and earnestness of the 1.0 movement and the flippancy and transgressive humor of the 2.0 movement. The former was overly serious while the latter was overly ironic and immature. The populist style of being plain spoken and getting straight to the point is something that we should keep. We should also be engaged with the national political conversation. We should also continue with the networking and community building. Finally, the focus on health and fitness in the 2.0 movement was worthwhile for its own sake and something we should continue doing.

The 2.0 movement got carried away with vulgarity, irony, conspiracy theories, misogyny, anti-intellectualism and triggering and owning the libs. It got even worse with the Zoomers where the boundary between the real world and the internet kind of disappeared. For whatever reason, the 1.0 and 2.0 movements were also fond of framing and presenting their views in terms of Neo-Nazism whether in an earnest or ironic form. The 2.0 movement was also plagued by violent accelerationism and cults of personality. It was essentially presenting the same ideas and material in a more humorous and transgressive way and using social media and riding Donald Trump’s coattails to attract a larger audience.

I essentially agree with most points.

One minor issue – while I agree that health and fitness are important, we need to be careful with some of the specifics of the WN 2.0 viewpoint. I remember Costello’s “carnivore diet” post at Counter-Currents, as well as all of the flubro-ism of WN 2.0, and thus caution the reader that while health and fitness are important, places and individuals like Counter-Currents, Zman, Ramsey, Mangan, etc. are not what I would consider sound sources of information in that regard. EGI Notes, in contrast, does not tell people what to do, but does state, first, what I do and why (such as get vaccinated), and also describes heath consequence of various choices (e.g., red and processed meat being associated with an increased cancer risk). I have also challenged some of the fitness advice coming from the likes of Mangan and Roissy.  Once you know the facts, you can make your own decision about what what you want to do. It's your choice, I recommend nothing; I just present both facts as well as my own choices, You decide for yourself.

Odds and Ends, 3/28/21

In der news.

See this.

Growing up, I never thought about race. I was raised in a small, almost 100 percent white, town. My parents rarely talked about politics, but if you had asked me in my early twenties what political affiliation I had, I would have told you I was liberal. The only non-whites I saw when I was in elementary school were on television, and the blacks portrayed were likable, not dangerous. My parents never spoke to me about race, and I wasn’t curious about it.

Yes, I do believe that there is a correlation between "I was raised in a small, almost 100 percent white, town” and “if you had asked me in my early twenties what political affiliation I had, I would have told you I was liberal.” A causative correlation, I would think. My own life experiences would never have allowed such naivete. It’s a shame – on the one hand, exposure of White children to significant numbers of non-Whites, particularly Blacks and non-White Hispanics, is a form of child abuse; on the other hand, without such experience, painful and self-destructive racial naivete sets in. Perhaps some sort of educational paradigm where limited exposure to such racial specimens in a safe, controlled environment takes place would be suitable, but there really is no substitute for experiencing vibrancy “in the wild,” so to speak.

See this.  While I agree with the basic premises of the article, this is absurd:

Greg Johnson and Richard Spencer are both intellects of extremely high quality…

Is that meant to be a joke?

Any critique of Jewish power has to come from a place of love and understanding…

Wha?

Comment:

Counter Current is an counter intel front, probably for DHS (Homeland Security…

Yawn. How about calling Greg Johnson “a Jew” next? I despise Counter-Currents, but making defamatory accusations based on zero evidence is not the way  to oppose Johnson.

I’m no Hitler fanboy, and I have some of my own objections to Nutzis, but I object to Liddell’s characterization of “neo-Nazi” types as typically “sub-White” and/or “sub-masculine.” Really? Pierce?  Rockwell?  Carto? What about Will Williams? I would think that a Green Beret war veteran is at least as “masculine” as some Scottish blogger living in Japan. What about Roper? And all of those aforementioned gentlemen, with the exception of Carto (who I believe was at least of partial French ancestry, and thus Western European), were/are all of “British” extraction. And even if Liddell wants to make comments about Duke’s alleged “plastic surgery” and the “sub-masculine” implications of a focus on self-appearance, still, Duke is a heterosexual Anglo. Whatever Liddell thinks of Strom, he’s a heterosexual of Norwegian ancestry. So, none of them are “sub-White” and are not queer (alleged “sub-masculinity” aside). Johnson and Spencer are not the "be all and end all" for activism, past or present. Those two "heroes" are just the meritless affirmative action creations of the Virginia/Beltway-Georgia-Florida "movement" mafia axis, of which some components allegedly (according to "movement" accusations and warnings from the early 2000s) may have had/have "streaks of lavender."

Speaking of Counter-Currents and Johnson - I note that the Turko-Albanian "Macedonian" Jeelvy uses the platform stupidly given to him by Gaslighting Greg to engage in balkanoid feuds with ethnic Albanians. While the latter are called "not culturally European" and are termed a "biracial nation," Jeelvy, with his Borat characteristics and "culture" of promoting 14 year old brides and woman-beating is, of course, the paragon of the Western soul.

And then we have commentators pontificating on who in the Balkans "is White" - judged of course by "blonde hair, blue eyes, and fair skin." How about judging "Whiteness" by the lack of mongoloid features? We can consider Bromstad and Bjork and ask if North Germanic peoples are "White" or not. Or maybe they're simply "biracial" nations like Albanians, eh? - we have a "White" population and a Hapa population, the latter represented by the two aforementioned "celebrities."

Mendacious stupidity:

"White Nationalist," which has a fairly healthy currency here on the Whadda-We-Call-Ourselves Right, strikes me as even more problematical. What is the nation to which "nationalist" is the referent? "White" isn't a nation, nor likely to become one.

What an idiot – and note how he’s mimicking a leftist talking point with the “White isn’t a nation.”  There’s a difference between a nation and a state:

A state is an independent political entity with clear geographic boundaries. Nation is a large body of people united by common origin, history, culture, ethnicity, or language.  The main difference between state and nation is that state is a political and legal entity whereas nation is a socio-cultural entity.

I of course would alter that to a nation being a biological-socio-cultural entity.

I’m always fascinated by the utter imbecility of the Derbyshirian-Leftist argument – as if White nationalists actually believe that there is a nation of “Whitetopia” or “Whiteia” or “White” somewhere on Earth, and it is up to the likes of Derbyshire and other pro-multiracialist leftists to break to us the dire news that such a nation does not exist.

Basques are a nation, despite not having a state. Jews were always a nation, even before Israel. If there are Whites, worldwide, who conceive nationhood on the basis of race, superseding ethnicity, that is perfectly rational, as are plans for nation-building, or federation-building, based on that racial-national identity. One is not required to have a ready-made state with the name of your national group in order to have legitimacy as a nation, Derbyshire, you mendacious scum.

Of course, there’s a likely reason why Derbyshire doesn’t like White nationalism, and eagerly grasps for alternatives that would allow for the inclusion of non-Whites: Rosie and the kids. The rest of us are of course not obligated to care about that concern, which likely also informs his gaslighting about “The Arctic Alliance,” also mentioned in that execrable essay. In fact, the only real concern I have about Rosie and the kids is that I do not want to live in the same polity as them.

HBD-Nordicist Confusion

And other news. In all cases, emphasis added.

It is hilarious when the HBD-Nordicists are so hysterical in praising Scandinavians that they utterly contradict each other.

First, you have MacDonald and his "Swedes and other Scandinavians are ultra-individualistic" due to a "primordialist" explanation - you see, Scandinavians are so ultra-individualistic for genetic, evolutionary reasons.  Very well.  But - but! - then you have HBD-Nordicist Welton who writes about Scandinavian collectivist conformity (in positive terms of course, such conformity is no doubt "of great benefit to all humanity") somewhat akin to what the "insane" Sallis has written:

Scandinavia has an intense culture of conformity and trust. This is a fact of life in these countries. Sweden is infamous for its “Jante Culture” in which people are encouraged to conform, to not stand out, and to always focus on creating an equal and harmonious community. This also characterises other Scandinavian countries, especially Finland, but also Norway.

And what does Welton assert is the origin of Scandinavian conformity? You guessed it...genetics:

...where such a culture would come from. A reasonable answer: people adapted to an extremely harsh environment, who would thus have a very small gene pool and be strongly selected to be highly cooperative because only groups like that would survive...you end up with peoples who are extremely trusting, including of authority, and who very much want to conform.

Mr. Welton, meet Dr. MacDonald (and vice versa).  Type II laughter ensues.

Welton is the same HBD idiot who suggested that the high toll of covid in Italy was due to Italians deriving ancestry from "The Fertile Crescent" (in other words, Italians are Middle Easterners). But, interestingly, Russians are suffering badly from covid-19, and in any graph of European-specific PCA, Russians are relatively genetically distant from Italians, and, indeed, do not have much of the Neolithic ancestry (stupidly referred to as "Fertile Crescent" by Welton) found in Southern Europe. But, hey, let's not let facts or anything like that get in the way of HBD dogma now, shall we?

Behold the monsters.  Meanwhile, the HBD filth continue to promote the lies of Chinese intelligence agencies that the virus is an “American bioweapon.”  

Two things:

1. I again call for the at least some of the HBDers to be investigated as potentially being agents of a foreign power, undeclared agents in violation of federal law. Note I make no accusations against anyone; I merely call for an investigation to uncover the facts. If the HBDers have nothing to hide, then they should welcome an open inquiry.

2. We need consider whether the “Ben Dover” joke is purely in jest, or whether the mocking ridicule actually describes an actual phenomenon. The HBDers’ behavior regarding all of this is so astonishing that the most bizarre possibilities need to be considered.

If you think Der Movement will talk about this, think again.  When “Ben Dover” gives them their marching orders, the measured groveling commences.  After all, the HBDers are still pushing the “American bioweapon” lie.  “Ben Dover” demands no less.

Probability of these “furious patient men” actually doing anything = 0%.

Probability of BML/Antifa vandalizing and looting another small business with complete impunity = 100%

The difference between Left and Right: The Left acts and the Right talks.

Here’s a question for Der Movement: If the covid vaccine is a “toxic jab” as part of a conspiracy of “Jew doctors” then why does Israel have the highest per capita vaccination rate?  Or are the Type Iers going to argue that all of those Israeli “jabs” are actually “saline shots?”

Giving to this is more important than keeping the happy penguins in their blue state lifestyle.

Plebity Foundation

is creating community

About

The Plebity Free Speech Fund

The Plebity Free Speech Fund will raise funds and provide grants as a way to offer material support for the cause of free speech. The Fund will offer 2 forms of grants. The first will go to individuals who have lost their employment or otherwise been materially harmed as a result of exercising their free speech. The second will be in the form of small, more frequently awarded gifts to individuals who come to our attention who have in some significant way supported the cause of free speech.

We hope that the Plebity Fund can provide just a little more assurance to people who want to speak out but are afraid. Mobs that target people for their speech pick off their victims one by one. By banding together as a community of people who support free speech for all, we can stand up to the self-appointed thought police and the Twitter mobs that doxx people and contact employers. We hope to contribute to an atmosphere where more and more people feel free enough to explore and express heterodox ideas.

Not everyone is able to gather a nest egg that would see them through the hard times of sudden unemployment. People are afraid, afraid to speak freely, afraid to lose their jobs. And rightly so. The group-think mob has learned that it has the power to target people’s jobs. Getting people fired has become the go-to strategy of thought control.

We can only stand up to this mob if we join forces and do it together. That is the purpose of the Free Speech Fund.

Experiment in Democracy: How the Fund Works

Anyone who wishes can opt to become a member with voting rights by subscribing to the fund here on Patreon. Subscribing members will have the opportunity to consider specific applications for grants and vote on whether a particular applicant should receive an award. 

All tiers will have equal voting rights.

Full details are inside. Come join us!

If you prefer to make a one time donation please come to our gofundme page here:

https://charity.gofundme.com/o/en/campaign/plebity-freedom-of-speech-fund

So, that is someone doing something productive. That is community building - at least indirectly - and is an attempt to deal with social pricing.  Will the rank-and-file contribute?  Or will you keep on funneling money to the happy penguins and the gaslighters?  You do have a choice.

In response to Johnson’s review of the “right-wing” movie Taxi Driver:

ChristianElite

@AnointedNation

Replying to 

@NewRightAmerica

Not sure how this is "right wing" hes just some degenerate that does nothing through out the movie.

k

@krisskrossd

pretty much sums at most of the movement then.

Scary White Male

@peisithanatoso

Beat me to it, it's the perfect analogy

Scary White Male

@peisithanatoso

"Right wingers" are always trying to adopt things as "right wing" even though the people behind said things laugh at and disown you. Very gay!

This is the outcome of HBD; this is the result the HBDers want. HBD is naked Jewish-Asian supremacism.

ECs vs. NEC filth.  2500 years of history right there. The battle never ends.

The “traditionalist” vision of the White future is thus:

…spend a winter evening snug in one’s own Hobbit hole…

Chinamen rocket to the stars, while Whites hide out from the “toxic jabs” (aka, life-saving vaccinations) snug in their hobbit holes. Traditionalism!  Yogi Bear in The Age of Aluminum!  The Men Who Can’t Tell Time!

A Riposte to the Overt

A response.

A common recent trope in the “movement” coming from those who write (and do other things) under their own names – those who are open and overt activists – is that they are morally superior to those anonymous and pseudonymous activists who are not open and overt. Indeed, these attitudes, being increasingly common at Counter-Currents, particularly among some of its newer writers, are typically expressed in sanctimonious terms.

I would like to make a counter-argument, one that I believe has not been made before (or at least, I have not seen it presented).

Overt writers and activists are most typically directly or indirectly dependent on “D’Nations” of some sort to support themselves. Further, many of them are employed by others, at (often online) journals, blogs, etc. for which they write (and these journals and blogs are themselves supported and maintained by supporter donations and/or subscriptions). Therefore, these open and overt writers need to be careful so as to not to offend and alienate the donors, subscribers, and employers on whom they depend. This will, naturally, result in self-censorship and the inability to freely speak their mind on various topics. Even if they choose to associate with journals and blogs for which they already have an underlying ideological affinity, it is unlikely that they are going to agree with their donors, subscribers, and employers on all important topics, and therefore the possibility of self-censorship to preserve their income exists, and is indeed likely. Overt writers are therefore more likely to be more constrained, and less free, to express controversial views within their particular domain (e.g., controversial views about the "movement" itself) than those who are anonymous/pseudonymous.

I can imagine that some of the Counter-Currents writers will claim that they now have complete freedom to speak their mind, unlike their previous situation at other online journals/blogs.  Perhaps.  However, would they still be viable at their new home if they, for example, started criticizing homosexuality with the vehemence of, say, Andrew Joyce?  If they critiqued Greg Johnson as has Joyce, Forney, and Friberg?  I think not.  And the same applies elsewhere. How long would a VDARE writer be welcome if they started attacking the monetary compensation practices of the happy penguins? What about an American Renaissance writer who delves into anti-Semitism or who criticizes HBD “race realism?” Then there is the possibility of self-censorship of the overt writer because of concerns about the reaction from the Left.

In contrast, one can reasonably argue that anonymous/pseudonymous writers, particularly those not affiliated with anyone else and even more particularly those who do not shill for “D’Nations,” are more free to speak their minds about controversial subjects, including subjects controversial within the “movement,” without needing to consider whether angry donors would withhold handouts or whether outraged subscribers would decide to cancel - or whether a blog editor would be offended and cut ties with them.

I’m not arguing that the anonymous/pseudonymous are superior to the overt; indeed, all else being equal (which it so rarely is, truth be told), the latter can reasonably be seen as more valuable than the former. But each has its place, and we must “balance the books” and look at the costs of benefits of each option. The overt activists present the view that their choice to be open in their activism may be harmful only to themselves but always is a benefit to the “movement.” That is not invariably true. An alternative scenario is that of someone who makes a living off of their activism (and in some cases, a six-figure living), while spouting dogma to please donors and subscribers – cui bono?  Does activism as a whole benefit when people modulate their opinions to maintain their viability within a “movement” on which they depend?  In which group are “movement” grifters most often found – the overt or the anonymous and pseudonymous?  The answer is obvious.

The attacks have heretofore always one-sided, always the overt critiquing the anonymous/pseudonymous. There are two sides to every issue.  Instead of ad hominem attacks based on overt vs. anonymous/pseudonymous status, how about an honest evaluation of ideas instead? 

Odds and Ends, 12/13/20

In der news. In all cases, emphasis added.

See this.

The WASPs who did engage in politics after World War II were some of the greatest traitors to this nation. Nelson Rockefeller, John Lindsay, and George Romney were all fierce advocates of the Civil Rights revolution and promoted white dispossession. There was no blue-blood reactionary in the political arena at this time. Rockefeller, Lindsay, and Romney were accurate representatives of their class.

Sounds like something Lind or Sallis would write, and it is true enough, no doubt.  But, hey! We’ll be told that we need more men like them and that they are of great benefit to all humanity.

The rest of the essay, like the book it is reviewing, is a complete confusion, conflating Jewish and Gentile “Ellis Islanders” – which is absurd.

For all their faults, the WASPs aren’t the ones invading the world while inviting it in.

It’s the elites who succeeded them.

Well, if by “elites” you mean the WASP-Jew alliance, augmented with ("douchebag") Irish like the Kennedys, then, yeah, you got it, right on target.

According to Greg Johnson, ”the Brimelows are wealthy.”  If this is so (and if not, mophead can take it up with the gaslighter, that’s what Johnson said), then we can ask why mophead took a personal compensation of ~ $180,000 in the last fiscal year covered in the VDARE filings on ProPublica?  

The next time a Quota Queen whines that their “movement” “needs more money” and that “people need to be generous” remember all of that.

Sallis right once again  It was I who stated that Asians – the Chinese in particular – pimp out their “women” to White males (not men) as agents of influence to promote Asian/Chinese interests – not only in HBD but in the broader society.

The woman at the center of the operation, a Chinese national named Fang Fang or Christine Fang, targeted up-and-coming local politicians in the Bay Area and across the country who had the potential to make it big on the national stage.

Through campaign fundraising, extensive networking, personal charisma, and romantic or sexual relationships with at least two Midwestern mayors, Fang was able to gain proximity to political power, according to current and former U.S. intelligence officials and one former elected official.

Speaking of Suzie Wong, I don’t see why the HBD-Nordicists are posting about this.  After all, aren’t the Chinese gods?

See this.  I won’t even bother posting all of Johnson’s covid-alarmist and anti-flubro tweets from earlier this year. There were, probably, dozens of them.  The “man” is a monster; as I’ve often said – he is the most fundamentally dishonest individual I’ve ever had the displeasure of interacting with.

There is no way out but through Johnson.

Retweeted by Johnson – I suppose he’ll need a fresh pair of trousers. That said, Spencer is a jerk.  But, Greg, that’s your fellow Quota Queen. You’ve never answered my question – what credentials did Spencer have to be made President of NPI (or even his earlier editing jobs)?

Hey Goad, should we resent Ireland for sending all of their “douchebags” here?

Another idiot speaks.

…now that Spain is no longer a fascist country.

It never was one, retard. When are idiots going to stop classifying every rightist authoritarian state as "fascist?"  The Franco regime had all of the palingenetic revolutionary dynamism as a dead muskrat roadkill on the side of a highway.

Shamelessly rattling the tin cup.

And then on to golf!

Something must be done!  Law and order!

Since I often criticize people, it is only fair that I praise them when they do what I think is right. See this.  Note the picture of Abbie Hoffman with the note under it: 

Rubin’s close associate, fellow Jew Abbie Hoffman. Jared Taylor says this man is White.

Finally!  Someone in the hardcore WN 1.0 crowd finally critiques the "Jews are HuWhite" HBDers. Thank you, Mr. Strom.  More, please.  

We need a full-throated critical analysis of the Jew-worshipping and East Asian-worshipping "race realist" HBD cult.

Copy,copy,copy,steal,steal, steal:

The intelligence is clear: Beijing intends to dominate the U.S. and the rest of the planet economically, militarily and technologically. Many of China’s major public initiatives and prominent companies offer only a layer of camouflage to the activities of the Chinese Communist Party. I call its approach of economic espionage “rob, replicate and replace.” China robs U.S. companies of their intellectual property, replicates the technology, and then replaces the U.S. firms in the global marketplace.

     John Ratcliffe, U.S. Director of National Intelligence, “China is National Security Threat No. 1,” The Wall Street Journal, December 3, 2020

Odds and Ends, 12/5/20

In der news.

Since Counter-Currents is part of the HBD-Nordicist-ethnonationalist alliance, what we must accept – indeed, predict with mathematical certainty – is that the site will engage in ever-more-explicit hostility toward Southern and Eastern European White ethnics.

Case in point:

…it’s still arguable whether Italians are white.

And:

Jim Goad

Posted December 3, 2020 at 5:13 pm | Permalink

I think you’re right about this. In the neighborhood where I grew up, you were either Irish or Italian, and it was clear the Italians weren’t white.

We could in theory extend that analysis to other types of people, but, for example, examining the racial worth and "whiteness" of autistic defectives isn't worth the time. And, after all, Goad, who is mysteriously sensitive on this subject, tells us that only "dumb and inarticulate" people use the term "autistic." Very well. So, a question remains: Is being "colorblind" about Blacks consistent with "caring more about facts than social approval?" One would think it the opposite, no?  

More:

Jim Goad

....I resent Italy for sending all its douchebags here, though.

Personally, I resent people - not anyone in particular, of course, just a general statement of principle - who produce mentally defective children who are a burden on society. 

See this.

The economic burden associated with ASD is substantial and can be measured across multiple sectors of our society. Previous analyses that focused on health care underestimated this economic burden, particularly for school systems.

But, wait:

…parents who reported that their child had ASD did not have significantly higher out-of-pocket costs...compared with control parents.

So – an increased economic burden and yet the parents “did not have significantly higher out-of-pocket costs.”  Guess who pays?  

And how much?

ASD is associated with approximately $3.6 million in lifetime social cost.

The lifetime social costs to date are more than $7 trillion, the equivalent of about two years of total federal revenue for the United States.

By 2029, If prevalence remains the same, the cost will grow to $11.5 trillion, and if prevalence continues to increase at the past rate, the cost will grow to nearly $15 trillion.

On Goad (from Wikipedia, emphasis added):

In May 1997, Goad began dating then-stripper Anne "Skye" Ryan about the time that Debbie was diagnosed with the ovarian cancer that later killed her. Goad described Ryan as "Sweet Dracula girl" and as being "...fifteen years younger than me and a thousand times more fucked-up." In November 1997, Debbie was granted a restraining order against Goad, after stating that he had hit, kicked, and spit on her and threatened to kill her. They divorced in December, 1997.

In May 1998, Goad and Ryan had a fight in Goad's car outside of Portland. Goad left Ryan by the side of the road, and fled to Washington state. When police met Ryan in a hospital emergency room, she had a blackened eye that was swollen shut, "bite marks on her hand and she was bleeding in several places. Goad was charged with assault and kidnapping…Goad plead guilty to reduced charges and served 2 1/2 years, split between jail and prison. He was released in the fall of 2000. When asked if he had any remorse or guilt about beating Ryan, Goad said, "Absolutely not. I enjoyed it."

Oh my God, indeed.

I can’t think of another white criminal syndicate in existence that makes a point of being white.

What about Der Movement?  Certainly, the criminally-oriented are well represented in its ranks.

More HBD-Nordicist Counter-Currents comments in response to Goad's "it was clear the Italians weren’t white."

Paul

Posted December 4, 2020 at 7:46 am | Permalink

The scene between Dennis Hopper and Christopher Walken in “True Romance” is instructive in this regard.

Note how Sallis' Law applies well in this case.  Here we have a Goad essay ostensibly about Black criminal gangs and, of course, it devolves into a discussion about the "whiteness" (or lack thereof) of Italians. After all, what "movement" discussion doesn't end up focusing on that topic?  Godwin's Law has nothing on Sallis Law.

The problem with that whole comments thread was that wop who decided to show up and complain. Why bother?  Just acknowledge that Counter-Currents is an anti-White ethnic, pro-HBD, pro-homosexual site dedicated to raising "D'Nations" and dedicated to promoting HBD-Nordicism-ethnonationalism (actually, ethnoimperialism) and move on. Start your own blog, do your own thing, and just scan Counter-Currents to stay up-to-date to what the opposition is doing; if you want to criticize them, do it in your own forum, or in another forum that supports the interests of all Europeans, instead of supporting the interests of "Rosie and the kids."

My paradigm that Counter-Currents is headed in the direction of Majority Rights is supported by things like this. Regardless of what you think about that cartoon, the facts are that, first, Counter-Currents has pretensions of being the "erudite blog for the 120+ IQ crowd," while, at the same time, catering to Goad's Howard Stern-like essays that are accompanied by crudely racist cartoons and, second, this is exactly like "J. Richards" and his moronic posts that were accompanied by crude anti-Jewish cartoons of a quality that would have made Julius Streicher blush. It's the same appeal to Type I crudity in order to boost page views and cater to the newest toy in the writer playpen (in this case, Goad). It would seem likely that one reason Johnson recruited Goad is to boost page views - and, hence, "D'Nations." The seriousness of that blog (such as it is and was) suffers. And as regards the crude images at Richard Lynn's Pseudoscience - that was openly a satiric blog, openly mocking HBD stupidities - unlike Counter-Currents, there was no pretense there of being the "Ivy League" of WN. The same with satiric content at this blog.

Typical Anglo-Nordicist perspective:

There are Hispanics in the Chicago area, but they mostly act, talk, and look like whites that are “ethnic.”

What?  Dominicans, Italians, Puerto Ricans, Poles, Mexicans, Greeks – all the same!  Damn the wogs!

Obama’s mother was a white liberal from the Anglo-Nordic American majority…

Having “white liberal” and “Anglo-Nordic” in the same sentence is superfluous repetition.

I see all of this at Counter-Currents as a very good thing indeed. After all, I could post for years (as I have done) about how Der Movement is hostile to White ethnics, or about Sallis' Law, or about the HBD-Nordicist-ethnonationalist alliance, and the shabbos sud and shabbos ost stepandfetchits would ignore it all and just go along with Johnson's description of me as "insane." Then comes along the latest crop of moronic Counter-Currents writers and commentators who do nothing but prove my points, time and again.  More, please.

In theory, one shouldn't interfere with an opponent making a mistake, but Johnson can't help himself, so writing this won't change a thing. That blog will continue making this blog look prescient.

GNXPers weep.

See this.

Beyond that, white men are increasingly embittered. Bitterness is a wild card, because it leads to spite. A spiteful man will even harm his own interests to avenge himself. He can’t be reasoned with, predicted, or controlled. A critical mass of white men like that is going to be a problem for more than just the movie business.

I won’t comment on the irony of Johnson’s comment considering his past attacks on me as “crazy and bitter” and “an embittered former writer” (at Counter-Currents).

Heil Hitler!

Meet Mike Lee:

Jack Ryanod 

This horror - sponsoring our people's replacement by lowest wage Indian Shudra was sponsored by Mike Lee US Senator from Utah - White guy, went to BYU.

Hey!  Lee is a Herrenvolk high-truster, and that’s all that matters!

High Trusters!

Tom Cotton and David Perdue publicly supported it. It’s very odd that Perdue and Kelly Loeffler didn’t oppose it since they are desperately trying to convince Georgia conservatives to vote for them right now.

Very cognitive, very elite.

See this.  Maybe that will turn out to be the case.  It is more likely however that Trump will merely tweet "Fraud! Something must be done!" and go out golfing.  Predicting Trump is like predicting the weather, short term - the persistence theory holds; past history is predictive of future events. In Trump's case, ineptness and inertia.  But, hey, if I'm wrong, great, I'll admit it.

This is absurd.

The movement is far more serious and capable than it was in 2015 when the “Alt Right” was at its peak. 

No, the “movement” is worse than ever, and will continue to get worse with affirmative action losers in charge.

The movement in-fighting will fade, because it is easier to unite in opposition and there will be no more tactical debates about whether to defend Donald Trump.

Ha!  Tell that to the castrato-voiced Quota Queens who soil their trousers (front side) with every latest criticism of Richard Spencer.