Odds and Ends, 3/28/21

In der news.

See this.

Growing up, I never thought about race. I was raised in a small, almost 100 percent white, town. My parents rarely talked about politics, but if you had asked me in my early twenties what political affiliation I had, I would have told you I was liberal. The only non-whites I saw when I was in elementary school were on television, and the blacks portrayed were likable, not dangerous. My parents never spoke to me about race, and I wasn’t curious about it.

Yes, I do believe that there is a correlation between "I was raised in a small, almost 100 percent white, town” and “if you had asked me in my early twenties what political affiliation I had, I would have told you I was liberal.” A causative correlation, I would think. My own life experiences would never have allowed such naivete. It’s a shame – on the one hand, exposure of White children to significant numbers of non-Whites, particularly Blacks and non-White Hispanics, is a form of child abuse; on the other hand, without such experience, painful and self-destructive racial naivete sets in. Perhaps some sort of educational paradigm where limited exposure to such racial specimens in a safe, controlled environment takes place would be suitable, but there really is no substitute for experiencing vibrancy “in the wild,” so to speak.

See this.  While I agree with the basic premises of the article, this is absurd:

Greg Johnson and Richard Spencer are both intellects of extremely high quality…

Is that meant to be a joke?

Any critique of Jewish power has to come from a place of love and understanding…

Wha?

Comment:

Counter Current is an counter intel front, probably for DHS (Homeland Security…

Yawn. How about calling Greg Johnson “a Jew” next? I despise Counter-Currents, but making defamatory accusations based on zero evidence is not the way  to oppose Johnson.

I’m no Hitler fanboy, and I have some of my own objections to Nutzis, but I object to Liddell’s characterization of “neo-Nazi” types as typically “sub-White” and/or “sub-masculine.” Really? Pierce?  Rockwell?  Carto? What about Will Williams? I would think that a Green Beret war veteran is at least as “masculine” as some Scottish blogger living in Japan. What about Roper? And all of those aforementioned gentlemen, with the exception of Carto (who I believe was at least of partial French ancestry, and thus Western European), were/are all of “British” extraction. And even if Liddell wants to make comments about Duke’s alleged “plastic surgery” and the “sub-masculine” implications of a focus on self-appearance, still, Duke is a heterosexual Anglo. Whatever Liddell thinks of Strom, he’s a heterosexual of Norwegian ancestry. So, none of them are “sub-White” and are not queer (alleged “sub-masculinity” aside). Johnson and Spencer are not the "be all and end all" for activism, past or present. Those two "heroes" are just the meritless affirmative action creations of the Virginia/Beltway-Georgia-Florida "movement" mafia axis, of which some components allegedly (according to "movement" accusations and warnings from the early 2000s) may have had/have "streaks of lavender."

Speaking of Counter-Currents and Johnson - I note that the Turko-Albanian "Macedonian" Jeelvy uses the platform stupidly given to him by Gaslighting Greg to engage in balkanoid feuds with ethnic Albanians. While the latter are called "not culturally European" and are termed a "biracial nation," Jeelvy, with his Borat characteristics and "culture" of promoting 14 year old brides and woman-beating is, of course, the paragon of the Western soul.

And then we have commentators pontificating on who in the Balkans "is White" - judged of course by "blonde hair, blue eyes, and fair skin." How about judging "Whiteness" by the lack of mongoloid features? We can consider Bromstad and Bjork and ask if North Germanic peoples are "White" or not. Or maybe they're simply "biracial" nations like Albanians, eh? - we have a "White" population and a Hapa population, the latter represented by the two aforementioned "celebrities."

Mendacious stupidity:

"White Nationalist," which has a fairly healthy currency here on the Whadda-We-Call-Ourselves Right, strikes me as even more problematical. What is the nation to which "nationalist" is the referent? "White" isn't a nation, nor likely to become one.

What an idiot – and note how he’s mimicking a leftist talking point with the “White isn’t a nation.”  There’s a difference between a nation and a state:

A state is an independent political entity with clear geographic boundaries. Nation is a large body of people united by common origin, history, culture, ethnicity, or language.  The main difference between state and nation is that state is a political and legal entity whereas nation is a socio-cultural entity.

I of course would alter that to a nation being a biological-socio-cultural entity.

I’m always fascinated by the utter imbecility of the Derbyshirian-Leftist argument – as if White nationalists actually believe that there is a nation of “Whitetopia” or “Whiteia” or “White” somewhere on Earth, and it is up to the likes of Derbyshire and other pro-multiracialist leftists to break to us the dire news that such a nation does not exist.

Basques are a nation, despite not having a state. Jews were always a nation, even before Israel. If there are Whites, worldwide, who conceive nationhood on the basis of race, superseding ethnicity, that is perfectly rational, as are plans for nation-building, or federation-building, based on that racial-national identity. One is not required to have a ready-made state with the name of your national group in order to have legitimacy as a nation, Derbyshire, you mendacious scum.

Of course, there’s a likely reason why Derbyshire doesn’t like White nationalism, and eagerly grasps for alternatives that would allow for the inclusion of non-Whites: Rosie and the kids. The rest of us are of course not obligated to care about that concern, which likely also informs his gaslighting about “The Arctic Alliance,” also mentioned in that execrable essay. In fact, the only real concern I have about Rosie and the kids is that I do not want to live in the same polity as them.