Fisking Todd Blodgett

Riposte to a buffoon (aka – answering a former Quota Queen). In all cases, emphasis added.

Laugh at this.

Let’s look at some background about Blodgett before getting to the letter.

Todd Blodgett…

With a surname like “Blodgett” you just know he got an instant free pass in Der Movement. And as you’ll soon see, you’d be correct.

…worked as an FBI informant…

Rat.

….inside the white supremacist movement.

There is no such thing.  There are very few “white supremacists” in America.  There are many pro-White activists, including White nationalists, which is a completely different type of specimen.

His political career began in the Reagan administration as a junior staffer. He helped the 1988 Bush-Quayle presidential campaign. But in the 1990s, Blodgett drifted into circles that included infamous American Nazis like Willis Carto, and “The Turner Diaries” author William Pierce.

Yeah…he “drifted.” Translation: As a NW European “WASP” type, he was immediately scooped up and elevated to high levels in Der Movement sans any real merit.

While Blodgett said he was never a “true believer,” …

There you go.  He was “never a true believer” but he was working with the biggest names in the American Far Right, including Carto and Pierce.  But, you see, you don’t need to be a “true believer” – just have the “correct” ethnic ancestry and surname.

…he helped Carto increase circulation and funding of his tabloid magazine, The Spotlight, and was a co-owner of Resistance Records, the largest white supremacist music label in the U.S. He spent time with other notable white supremacists, including Jared Taylor and David Duke.

Taylor and Duke.  Calling the Southrons!  How could they resist someone named Blodgett?  Of course, had he been named “Finkelstein” or “Chen” he may have still appealed to one of those gentlemen.

In the early-2000s, Blodgett become an FBI informant…

We’ll get an idea why shortly.

…and used his access to the highest levels of the American white supremacist community, including the KKK, neo-Nazis and the Aryan Nations. Since then, Blodgett has spoken out against white supremacy and has worked with groups like Life After Hate that rehabilitate white supremacists.

OK, a typical apostate.  But, we need more information.  

First, see this.

From March 2000 to November 2002, Blodgett was retained by the Federal Bureau of Investigation to supply information concerning organizations and individuals affiliated with the racist Far right. He regularly met with and reported to FBI and JTTF (the Joint Terrorism Task Force) agents and other officials, after attending gatherings hosted by Holocaust Deniers and White Supremacist groups, which featured racist, far-right extremists who were of interest to American anti-terrorism law enforcement officials and agencies.

More importantly, see this.

In the next four years, he would meet and work with other extremists including the notorious..

Emotional ad hominem.

…William Pierce, leader of the neo-Nazi National Alliance. After his role as a broker for Pierce was revealed in the Intelligence Report, Blodgett says his world began to collapse. In short order, he approached the magazine hoping, he said, to redeem himself publicly.

OK.  Motivation part one.  His work for Pierce was exposed, causing difficulties.  Therefore – “he approached the magazine hoping, he said, to redeem himself publicly.” Note there’s nothing there about the ideology of White nationalism being flawed, or the facts upon which that ideology is based being wrong.  Instead, he suffered personally because of System/Left social pricing, and therefore he wanted the personal damage to be alleviated.  

But…there’s more.  Now we’ll move on to motivation part two.

Blodgett: Truthfully, the answer is I was very opportunistically inclined. It was business — strictly business — and now I'm paying the price for it, and I'm not happy about it. I was stiffed by Willis Carto to the tune of about $78,000, and I'm angry.

OK. He was angry about money – allegedly he was “stiffed by Willis Carto to the tune of about $78,000.” Note once again – nothing about ideology, facts, or anything else, re: the cause being wrong.  Again, this was a personal issue. Now, a bit more about motivation number one:

My wife and my parents are not happy about the Washington Post [which ran an article recapitulating the earlier Intelligence Report story], and I want to get past that.

The personal social pricing pressure was increasing since his family was “not happy” about the whole situation, so he wanted “to get past that.”  Once again – a purely personal issue. Where’s the epiphany about the errors of White nationalism?  I’m sure any faux “epiphany” was retroactively applied later to rationalize a personal response to personal issues.

Now, let’s take a step back and discern how he got involved in Der Movement to begin with.

Blodgett: Republicans lost a lot of seats in 1990 and were kind of on the defensive and I just decided I was tired of politics. So I employed my skills as a salesman and advertising writer with a California entrepreneur who was and is the owner of Slick Times, a kind of Clinton lampoon. In January 1995, I decided to start my own consulting company.

In the meantime, Willis Carto had been contacting me to come work for him. I named a price I thought he'd never meet — $3,500 a month — and sure enough, he agreed. He also gave me an assistant.

I mean, do you need any more evidence of the "movement's" ethnic affirmative action policy? He went from “a salesman and advertising writer” and being involved with his “own consulting company" to being recruited to work for one of the leading lights of the American Far Right – and at $3,500 per month (1990s money – adjust for inflation)!  And with an assistant! That’s akin to Johnson hobnobbing with Taylor and Francis from day one, or Spencer being made the head of NPI sans any meaningful qualifications for that position.

Oh, you'll say that the "movement" interest in Blodgett was due to his mainstream Republican connections and was thus somehow merit based.  Really? First, as he himself admits, he was out of the political game when he was recruited by Carto. Second, according to Wikipedia, his initial entry into the mainstream political world was via personal connections, and his father was a politician. So, even if Carto's interest was connected to Blodgett's past foray into Republican activism, that GOP activism itself was connected to a mainstream "good old boys network" that mirrors that of Der Movement. In the end, it all conflates to ethnic affirmative action.

Now, we’ll get confirmation of another Sallisian meme – that some Quota Queens realize that what they are doing is practically hopeless, and are only in it for the money:

…there are certain people out there that when somebody speaks up for what they advocate, they give you money. Carto realized the value of espousing a lost cause: there's money in it.

And here is (according to Blodgett) Carto’s opinion of Der Movement and his role in it:

I asked him one time, "Do you really think you're going to succeed at what you're trying to do?" And he said no. He said, "It's the only thing I can do. I have no hobbies except my garden. I don't have any children." He knows there's no way he's ever going to be influential like he once was. He also once said, "Todd, the problem we have is that everybody on our side is stupid." That's what he said.

Of course, Blodgett can be lying about all of that. Perhaps Carto never said any of it.  Perhaps Blodgett's perception of Carto as being primarily interested in making money is derived from Blodgett's dislike of Carto. But it does have the ring of truth to it, at least from my perspective.

Before I begin fisking Blodgett’s letter, let me begin by summarizing the three major flaws within it.

• 1. He conflates White nationalism with “White supremacism,” which really does not exist anymore to any significant extent, and is quite different from White nationalism. Anyone who mislabels today’s pro-White advocates, including White nationalists, as "White supremacists" is being so fundamentally dishonest that their mendacity suggests to you there is little or nothing of what they say that you should believe.
• 2. He conflates pro-White activism with Der Movement, while in fact the latter is merely the currently extant vehicle for the former, akin to how the Republican Party is currently the vehicle for American conservatism. The failures of the vehicle do not necessarily reflect upon the righteousness of the cause that vehicle allegedly supports. If the vehicle is no good, it should be replaced; you need not give up on the cause itself.
• 3. The righteousness of a cause and the objective facts upon which it is based do not disappear just because a particular person becomes disillusioned with the cause and/or with the vehicle currently embodying that cause. Facts about White demographic displacement, racial reality, anti-White structures of the System, the failures of globalism and multiculturalism, and the reality of ethnic genetic interests, do not disappear just because someone is angry that they got “stiffed” for money by Willis Carto, or because the exposure of their activity upset their family. 

OK, back to the letter.

AN OPEN LETTER TO WHITE SUPREMACISTS

I once trod the treacherous path you’re traveling and it wrecked my life. Taking a detour and exiting the nasty, racist road is as much in your best interest as it is America’s. 

I do agree that it is in the interest of people to leave the catastrophe of Der Movement, but I do NOT agree that they should disavow pro-White activism (two different things; see above). Now, could it be in their selfish personal interest to drop out of activism completely? Well, would it have been in the interest of Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn to never have become an anti-Soviet dissident? I suppose he would have had a more comfortable life if he hadn’t gone down that path, starting with that Stalin-critical letter that led him from the Red Army to the gulag during WW II. But would that have been in his overall interest?  Would that have led to the proper fulfillment of his life?  His destiny? His dignity and self-worth? Would that have been in the interest of his people?  What is interest anyhow?  What price interest?  And do personal interests include ethnic genetic interests? I say yes. Hence, we can see the interest, the personal interest, in being a racial advocate. Why is it, according to people like Blodgett, only in the interests of Whites, and not of other groups, to eschew racial activism? Why is social pricing, and hence the damage to material personal interests, always focused on Whites and on pro-White activism?

Further: What is America? The concept is essentially meaningless in any practical sense. What is it?  A land area where disparate groups of people live?  A nation state that has drifted away from its original purpose? An economic unit of consumers? What? A set of “ideals?” Ideals are not ultimate interests. As human beings, as evolved organisms, as people, our prime concern is with people; our ultimate interests are in genetic continuity. After all, the “ideals” are for who?  For “Americans?”  What’s an “American”?  Who are the “people” we are concerned with?  The American population is being demographically transformed.  So when we refer to “people” we can ask – “what people?”  Who?  Whom?  If a pregnant illegal alien crosses into the USA and gives birth, then that offspring is an “American citizen.” That’s an “American.” The concept of America, which has become disconnected from a distinct people, and has become unmoored from normal human interests and from basic biology, is, as I have stated, practically meaningless. The concern should be with specific people in America, viewing America and its ideals as a vehicle for meeting the needs of those people and their interests, not as a vehicle for their dispossession and destruction. Talk to me about White Americans, not of an abstract America. Thus, America has no inherent interests.  Only groups of people in America - like White Americans - have inherent interests.

And, by the way, even IF you want to focus on an abstract America and its equally abstract interests, your beloved multiculturalism is destructive to those American interests, and it brings in people who have no understanding of, or interest in, preserving the “ideals” traditionally associated with America, peoples whose presence and whose own ethnocentrism breeds racial and ethnic conflict. Even from the standpoint of abstract ideals, America is a failure, and a greater White homogeneity would only assist in preserving the ideals Blodgett allegedly cares about. So, Mr. Blodgett, you are doubly wrong.

Significant differences exist between legitimate conservatism…

Why is conservatism “legitimate?”  Because it is useless, accomplishes nothing, is part of the System, agrees with the fundamental premises of that System, and is essentially fake, controlled opposition?  In any case, we are NOT conservatives.  What is there to conserve?  I am a Far Right Revolutionary.

…and bigoted, racist hatred. 

Emotional nonsense. In any case, if you are against “bigoted, racist hatred” you should oppose that targeting Whites.

Do you hate minorities so much that you overlook the significant contributions made by Conservatives…

I oppose conservatives, moron.

…who are black, Jewish, Hispanic, and Gay, to the honorable causes of limited government, a strong national defense, lower taxes, and freedom for the individual?

All those ideals are meaningless if they are enjoyed by a different people, if MY people are race replaced.  What Whites should care about “the honorable causes of limited government, a strong national defense, lower taxes, and freedom for the individual” in a Brown America?  And even his own premise is silly, since the vast majority of Blacks, Jews, Hispanics, and Gays are leftists who oppose all of these “legitimate” and “honorable” conservative concerns. If you really cared about those concerns, then you’d want a White America, full of people who have repeatedly demonstrated a fidelity to those issues and concerns.

And anyway, the whole point of White nationalism is that we do NOT want to live in the same polity, in the same society, as non-White peoples, regardless of if they are “conservatives.” This idiot is speaking a different language than what the “white supremacists” he is addressing actually understand - they understand RACE and CIVILIZATION, not tax rates and limited government.  By the way, has conservatism actually achieved progress toward any of your “honorable” causes? No, America moves in the opposite direction, away from those ideals, because of racial demographics.

Further, these days, mainstream conservatives are called "Nazis" and attacked in the streets, GOP congressmen are shot at (e.g., Scalise), and GOP senators assaulted (e.g. Paul). Rational people see what's happening in America and view Blodgett's stupidity as either painfully naive or blatantly mendacious (and that was true when the letter was written, not just today).

If so, you’re subscribing to an agenda comprised of unadulterated HATRED. 

So, Whites defending their group interests is “unadulterated HATRED.” Other groups doing the same is wonderfully admirable, and as you note, not criticized by this buffoon, who thus, in his hypocrisy, essentially confirms the validity of the WN worldview.

The high-tech, PR-savvy…

They’re not.

…well-funded…

That’s true, although they always cry poverty.

…evildoers…

Hmmm. Call your opponents “evildoers.”  Cue Dr. Evil asking for “one million dollars.”  Grow up.

…you’ve thrown in with will alter your life in the most negative of ways – as personal experience taught me. 

So, this moron is angry at Carto over money, and he is upset that his activity with Pierce got exposed, so that’s the “personal experience” he’s talking about, that and being a FBI informant – a rat.

If happiness, stability, and success are your goals, then you must open your mind and change your heart. 

Sure! Supporting a System that hates you for your race, and practices de jure and de facto discrimination against you, and defames your race and civilization, is the road to happiness and stability.

It’s not too late to change, and your past can be a lesson, not a life sentence. The late Willis Carto – a professional White Supremacist/anti-Semite, who conjured up the fraud called Holocaust denial, and who spent 60 years promoting hatred – was my boss from 1995 to 1998. 

And what real qualifications did you have for that?  Besides being a High Truster named Blodgett? Besides being involved in the GOP due to family and other personal connections? Did you ever have an involvement in politics - either mainstream or Far Right - based purely on your own merits?

To my lasting regret, I raised nearly $3 million for his Liberty Lobby, and generated an even greater amount of advertising revenue for his publications.

With all the money floating around Der Movement, that’s no grand accomplishment.

Within a few years, my business partner was Dr. William L. Pierce – the founder of the National Alliance, who wrote ‘The Turner Diaries’. 

Affirmative action.

He and Carto were America’s leading neo-Nazis. Motivated by greed and a lust for power, Pierce, Carto, and I owned what was then the world’s most profitable, successful racist music company, Resistance Records. These facts, for which I’ve atoned, won’t ever go away.

The facts about White race replacement and the System’s anti-White racism “won’t ever go away” either.

I routinely dealt directly with sociopaths like David Duke, ‘Pastor’ Richard Butler, Erich Gliebe, and John Tyndall, and racist killers like Jamie Von Brunn, Eric ‘the Butcher’ Fairburn, Tommy Mair, Wade Michael Page, and Benjamin Nathaniel Smith, among many others. 

High Trusters!  Inner Hajnal!   

My life spiraled downward, resulting from my involvement in HATE. This included becoming a drug addict for seven+ years, getting divorced and nearly being killed in a knife fight. These tragic consequences and others could’ve been averted had I avoided the vile realm of White Supremacy, even as an opportunistic profiteer. 

Make sure you capitalize "HATE" just in case your readers are not sure of whether you disapprove or not.

What an imbecile. His personal choices, his defects, those he blames on a set of political beliefs. As if being pro-White means you must be a drug addict, and, gee whiz, you can’t find any anti-racist leftist drug addicts anywhere, much less Black ones, right? Only White activists get divorced and, of course, there's never been Whites knifed by racist criminal Negroes.  Bad things happen to people only if they are pro-White, and don't you forget it!  This guy’s “logic” and his writing style (“vile realm of White Supremacy”) is akin to that of a not-too-bright twelve year old girl.

Monitoring haters for the FBI as a full-time, paid informant…

Note - paid. Being on the side of the angels, against hate wasn’t enough. Like Judas, he wanted his thirty pieces of silver.  Betrayal for a price.  Take that, you cheapskate Carto!

…opened my eyes to the insecurity of most of those who were brain-washed into the counterproductive, evil world in which you’re now ensconced. 

Pure projection. All these apostates are insecure, personal defectives and failures, who get involved in the cause for the wrong, almost always personal, reasons, and leave for the same bad reasons. You’ll note that nowhere in this screed is any sort of reasoned, analytical rebuttal of White nationalist beliefs. It is all emotion, all personal issues, and all superficial leftist buzzwords.

Seeking personal redemption helped me realize a better life was, indeed, within my grasp. I slayed my demons, beat drug addiction and got my life back on track. You, too, can do this! Walking away isn’t hard, but remaining with hateful, violence-prone, racist losers will ruin you.

One basic problem with the “movement” is that is full of drug addicted, illogical, hysterical losers like Blodgett, who have NOTHING going for them but their ethnicity.

Removing your Swastikas, covering up racist tattoos, replacing Doc Martens boots with pricey athletic shoes and wearing tassled loafers, Polo shirts and khakis, and calling yourselves “identitarians” instead of neo-Nazis, fools no one. 

As if most WNs were like that. I thought stereotyping was "bigotry?"  By the way, if "no one" is being fooled by pro-White activists, why do you and your handlers worry so much about those haters?

If your ideas were sound, you’d not need to engage in such chicanery. Got it?

Pure projection.  If YOUR ideas were sound, you’d need not write a long screed that contains ZERO substantive content, and is nothing but “being an activist made be angry and unhappy, so it is bad.” Got it?  Your mendacity fools no one.

Question - if WN ideas are so unsound, then why are they repressed by the System/Left instead of debated and refuted?

I hope and pray you’ll turn your life around, and that you and all misguided activists leave the milieu of organized Hate. 

Join the System that hates you and is destroying your race and civilization. That'll turn your life around. Just make sure you're paid for it, amirite?

Those who admit they were wrong are in a great position to help make things right.

Yes, make things right by being a PAID informant.  You may as well make a buck when you “make things right,” eh?

Like many who are now wasting their lives in this putrid, so-called Movement, I’ve been jailed. More than once. 

Was that a direct result of your prior beliefs? If not, it is irrelevant.  If so, being jailed for your beliefs means that the anti-System worldview of WNs has validity – the System is repressively anti-White. Either way, you're wrong. And if you were jailed because of activity you did that was somehow connected with your work for Carto and/or Pierce, that's either on you - a mistake you made - or it is diagnostic of a repressive System (or both).  Either way, you're wrong...again.

But whether or not you’ll ever be locked up, as long as you harbor hateful, anti-Semitic, bigoted thoughts, you’re locked in a hellish jail of your own making. 

Huh?  Having a set of political beliefs is not a “hellish jail.” The real “hellish jail” is not the straw man of “hateful, anti-Semitic, bigoted thoughts” but instead it is the reality of multiracial America.

So, set yourself free; unlock your mind…

Yes, reject the System and embrace White nationalism. That's my prescription, although I'm sure that's not exactly what Blodgett has in mind here.

…and banish hate from your soul. 

Tell that to those who hate Whites.

Having learned this the hard way, it’s easy for me to see where you’ll end up, unless you alter your thinking and change your ways. 

Don’t blame a set of political beliefs for your personal inadequacies.

You CAN get your life on track, even if it wasn’t previously all that cool. It’s easier than you think, and you won’t regret it. Trust me, I know.

In summary, Blodgett is a meritless defective Quota Queen loser, elevated in Der Movement because of his High Truster ancestry, who left Der Movement for purely personal reasons, became a paid FBI rat, and now justifies his pathetic life by preaching to us as if he had a grand epiphany. But, hey, trust him...he knows. He knows how to be a useless asshole.

Once again – there isn’t a single substantive, objective argument against White nationalism in that letter.  Not a single one.  Nothing. It’s all emotion.  It’s all the story of a pathetic defective, by his own admission not a “true believer,” who got involved in the cause for all the wrong reasons, left for personal reasons, became a PAID FBI informant, and now spews girlish tirades – Evil! Vile! Hate! – assuming that all WNs are as defective as he was (and likely, still is), and will become ever-so-happy if they ditch their beliefs – ideas that he has no actual arguments against – and become more System zombies.

What a buffoon.

It is obvious to the reader of this post that I was rather irritated by Blodgett's letter; the combination of emotional non-argument, illogic, and empty platitudes was just too much to take. The disturbing question is this - how many people like this are there in Der Movement today?  How many are not true believers, how many are FBI informants, grifters, drug addicts, or other types of defectives? Then we have the Hermansson case, which demonstrated how easy it is for even a non-government actor to infiltrate pro-White activism; Der Movement is lucky Hermansson was only a (relatively) short-term information-gathering infiltrator and not a long-term mole. With his ancestry and ability to make high-level "movement" connections, he could have risen to a position of some influence, and did considerable damage.  His sexuality, as we can observe with others, would not have been a hindrance for this (I wonder if his sexuality was known by any of the "movement" people he interacted with during his infiltration).

One wonders if such moles currently exist and how high in the "movement" hierarchy are they?  Who are they and what are they doing?

A Huge Tolerance for Unreality

Indeed. Excerpts, emphasis added.

SPLC material: Laugh at this. I usually don’t link to scum like the SPLC, but this is just too good to pass up.

Hatewatch identified and compiled over 600 cryptocurrency addresses associated with white supremacists and other prominent far-right extremists for this essay and then probed their transaction histories through blockchain analysis software. 

These people have every right to earn money and to use cryptocurrency if such is necessary in today’s climate of ideological intolerance that filth like the SPLC promote. My own objections to these activities are summarized at the end of this post.

What we found is striking: White supremacists such as Greg Johnson of Counter-Currents, race pseudoscience pundit Stefan Molyneux, Andrew “Weev” Auernheimer and Andrew Anglin of the Daily Stormer, and Don Black of the racist forum Stormfront, all bought into Bitcoin early in its history and turned a substantial profit from it. The estimated tens of millions of dollars’ worth of value…

Then they cry poverty and engage in continuous fundraising.  How about earning this largesse through productive activism instead?

…extreme far-right figures generated represents a sum that would almost certainly be unavailable to them without cryptocurrency, and it gave them a chance to live comfortable lives while promoting hate and authoritarianism.

That’s a good thing if – and only if – they were actually earning the money through work that advances the cause, which unfortunately is not the case.

Extremist Early Adopters of Bitcoin

Less than a quarter of Americans presently own some form of cryptocurrency as of May 2021. But those numbers increase substantially within fringe right-wing spaces, according to Hatewatch’s findings, approaching something much closer to universal adoption. 

That demonstrates how limited “Hatewatch’s” understanding of the “fringe right-wing space” is, said ignorance being a good thing.

Hatewatch struggled to find any prominent player in the global far right who hasn’t yet embraced cryptocurrency to at least some degree. 

By “prominent player” do they specifically mean a High Trust Quota Queen grifter?  

The average age of a cryptocurrency investor is 38, but even senior citizens in the white supremacist movement, such as Jared Taylor of American Renaissance, 69, and Peter Brimelow of VDARE, 73, have moved tens of thousands of dollars of the asset in recent years.

How come I’m not surprised by that?  Cue “Gregory Hood” crying “movement” poverty.

Cryptocurrency, or a group of digital moneys maintained through decentralized systems, has grown into a billion-dollar industry. A growing swath of Americans embrace the technology. Nothing is inherently criminal or extreme about it, and most of its users have no connections to the extreme far right. 

Excuse me, you filthy scum, there’s nothing “inherently criminal or extreme” in holding opinions that the SPLC disagrees with.

…‘Who are these people?’ there’s evidence that a lot of them are not the people you would want to support.

Obviously they do have support, moron. Where do they get their money from?

‘A huge tolerance for unreality’

Johnson of Counter-Currents, an influential figure in the white nationalist movement due to his outspoken support for the creation of an “ethnostate” serving only white, non-Jewish people, first picked up Bitcoin on Jan. 19, 2012, Hatewatch found, making him the first known figure in the movement to invest.

Of course. If it has to do with earning money, one can expect Gaslighting Greg to be at the forefront.

Johnson obtained the 29.82 Bitcoin on a date when prices for the asset sat between five and 10 dollars. Hatewatch found that Johnson flipped the Bitcoin from that first transaction and additional ones into over $800,000 worth of value. 

But, hey, all you guys living in your parents’ basement, you send in your few shekels to Counter-Currents, so you can live in The Golden Age today!  And make sure to do “estate planning” to leave whatever little you have to Greggy, rather than to your own family.

He has turned his website Counter-Currents into a hub for cryptocurrency discussion in the movement and solicits donations in digital tokens, or cryptocurrency “coins,” such as Bitcoin, Ethereum, Litecoin, Monero, Bitcoin Cash, Tether, Cardano, Ripple, Dash, Neo, Stellar Lumens and Basic Attention Token. Hatewatch reached out to him for a comment on this essay, but he did not respond.

He’s too busy fundraising.

“If any of you haters out there have any Bitcoin and you just want to get rid of it, send it to Counter-Currents, we have a Bitcoin address,” Johnson said on a Jan. 5 edition of his livestream, referring to those who perceive cryptocurrency as lacking in real world value. “I’ll hold it, I’ll stack it, I’ll keep it...

Indeed.

…I have a huge tolerance for unreality.”

Well, I see that Johnson and I can agree on that at least.

Johnson often platforms on his site an antisemitic white nationalist personality who goes by the pseudonym Karl Thorburn. As Thorburn, the author advises people in the movement to purchase and hold Bitcoin as an investment. 

Hold it?  No, no, a thousand times no!  You must donate it to Johnson.

Matt Gebert, a State Department official Hatewatch identified as a white nationalist organizer in 2019 (the government suspended him after we published the story), also has contributed material to Johnson’s Counter-Currents.

Counter-Currents is fighting the System! If you have any doubts, donate to their tax exempt 501c3 foundation.

“Bitcoin started in right-wing libertarianism,” Gerard said in an email. “This is not at all the same as being a neo-Nazi subculture. 

You’re behind the times, Gerard. With WN 3.0, what’s the difference?

‘At the expense of the parasites’

Molyneux, a self-described moral philosopher who started his career as a libertarian pundit, denies being a white supremacist despite repeatedly and falsely claiming that non-white people are predisposed to be of lower intelligence. 

That’s not “false” – at least with respect to Negroes and many Hispanic types. The evidence is overwhelming.

Molyneux generated million-dollar profits in less than a decade through his donations, flipping $1.67 million worth of value into at least $3.28 million. 

Cry poverty!

In February 2021, he described the value of cryptocurrency using tropes commonly associated with antisemitism.

“Bitcoin is a currency that serves the people at the expense of the parasites, rather than the currency which serves the parasites at the expense of the people”…

I suppose that by “parasites” he is not including “movement” “leaders.”  Why not?

‘The dollar is going to collapse’

Neo-Nazis promote propaganda claiming that Jewish people control the banking industry for the purpose of deliberately harming or undermining the ambitions of non-Jewish white men. 

That’s objectively true, isn’t it?

They also often openly cheer for the destruction of the U.S. as we know it – portraying the collapse of the government and financial system as an inevitability. 

Well, maybe eventually, who knows?  But Der Movement has been preaching “the System is about to collapse; it is imminent” for the past 50 years.

Daily Stormer editor Andrew Anglin, who in recent posts to his site advocated for the legalization of gang rape and called the COVID-19 pandemic a hoax…

Greg Johnson’s “WN 3.0.”

“We know as an absolute matter of fact that the dollar is going to collapse, and presumably every other fiat currency on the planet is going to get dragged down with it. Maybe property or metals are better than crypto. 

Here is a basic economic truth – the value of something is only what someone else is willing to pay for it or exchange for it, and, of course, the inherent value of that something to its owner.  You can’t eat gold. Gold has no intrinsic value (well, it does have some practical uses, but those uses are not the reason for gold's value) other than it is considered desirable; but in a Mad Max scenario, it will be as worthless as “fiat currency” unless it somehow is accepted as a medium of exchange – and there is no guarantee that it will. Property at least can be lived in. And only an idiot will say that a prediction of a sociopolitical/economic event is a "absolute matter of fact." How many times have we heard something like that about things that still have not occurred decades later?

The Associated Press and PBS Frontline collaborated on a report in September showing that Anglin supporters have sent him at least $4.8 million in Bitcoin, based upon data pulled from Chainalysis, a cryptocurrency analytics firm. 

Can he pay off legal judgments then?

The criminal underworld has reportedly employed Monero at a growing rate. The Financial Times noted in June that Monero has become “an increasingly sought-after-tool for criminals such as ransomware gangs.” In August, when comedian John Oliver ran a segment on his show depicting Monero’s advertising as subtly winking at criminals, an outreach organizer for the token defended their technology on grounds that it fights back against “a society of ever-growing mass surveillance.” Monero has elsewhere argued that it enables commerce and does not promote secrecy, or crime, any more than cash.

The SPLC, in a not-so-subtle fashion, tries to equate ideological opponents to “the criminal underworld.” They’re absolutely despicable. Want to see folks worse than the Quota Queens?  Try the SPLC.

Fuentes has not received or spent any Bitcoin at that address since Dec. 16, 2020, when he withdrew all 13.73371697 Bitcoin in his account, worth $266,392.40. 

Cry poverty!

‘A place that doesn’t hate us’

In the aftermath of the violence on Jan. 6, a gaming video livestreaming site called DLive banned Fuentes. Their decision further isolated the 23-year-old extremist, who had up to that date used nightly live video appearances on the site to influence crowds of young men to attend Stop the Steal rallies. People donated to white supremacists and neofascist livestreamers in substantial amounts on DLive, as Hatewatch has previously reported. The company permanently removed a number of extremists beyond Fuentes after Hatewatch reported on them, including the antisemitic performer Owen Benjamin and Jan. 6 participant Tim “Baked Alaska” Gionet.

Freaks aplenty.

‘The music will eventually stop’

When the Australian bank Westpac cut ties with Hitlerite, anti-Muslim extremist Blair Cottrell, his supporters, and many libertarians who may feel ambivalent about his hateful beliefs and simply love cryptocurrency, hyped his situation as an ideal reason for Bitcoin’s existence. These advocates suggested that if banks agree to cut ties with far-right extremists, those who are affected should respond by converting their fiat money (money issued by a government) entirely into cryptocurrency. This way of seeing the world, layered with dreams of big payoffs in passive income and understandable fears of government intrusion, has taken hold on the far-right fringe. But converting your money entirely into cryptocurrency carries undeniable risks.

So, on the one hand, scum like the SPLC support banking deplatforming of “far-right extremists,” and then, on the other hand, they crow about how unstable the alternatives are.  What low-life filth the SPLC scum are.

“Regulators want to crack down on fraud,” financial analyst Jacob King told Hatewatch of the cryptocurrency space. “While this is great news in the long run, it will have a disastrous impact on the price of Bitcoin and many altcoins as they are dependent on price manipulators like Tether and Binance.

Just the sort of unstable esoteric nuttiness that is grist for the mill for Quota Queen incompetents.

The feds are also allegedly probing Binance, cryptocurrency’s most trafficked exchange, in an investigation led by government officials who investigate money laundering and tax evasion…

Euphemisms for politically motivated harassment.

“Neo-Nazis have mainly used cryptocurrencies to escape the traditional financial system,” King added. “While that may have worked for the last few years, we’re seeing a huge pushback from regulators. The crypto markets are like a giant game of musical chairs. The music will eventually stop, and millions will be subjected to major losses as the prices tank back to their true values.”

That’s OK. The Quota Queens will use that as an excuse for more rounds of shameless tin cup rattling fundraising.

In addition to concerns about crashes, investors sometimes lose access to their cryptocurrency due to missing passwords or other blunders, rendering millions of dollars of value useless. 

Der Movement and “blunders” go together like peanut butter and jelly.

‘More valuable than gold’ or ‘close to nothing’

The “true values” of cryptocurrencies, as King put it, depends on who you are asking, and opinions vary in the extreme. What happens to digital currencies from here is likely to have a profound impact on the far right due to the degree to which extremists have adopted the technology relative to the population as a whole.

Given the established record of continuous failure for the Quota Queens, one can surmise that an inevitable disaster is waiting to unfold.  Time will tell.

For the risk analyst and author Nassim Nicholas Taleb, the true value of Bitcoin may be zero. He opined about its value in a recent paper:

Few assets in financial history have been more fragile than bitcoin. 

Makes sense then that inept Quota Queens would plunge right in.

Either way, those who invest in cryptocurrency have already experienced price volatility in the extreme, demonstrating the degree to which funds can evaporate overnight. 

More great judgment from Der Movement.

As I have previously written, I have no problem with activists making money to support genuine activism. What I do have a problem is with people crying poverty while raking in large sums of money, and then not earning that money by engaging in useful, positive work that significantly advances the cause. Money in activism is supposed to be a means to an end, not an end in itself. Unfortunately, I see people who seem to me to be engaging in activism to make money, rather than making money so as to be able to engage in activism. What I observe is endless fundraising and people who create “brands” to cater to the worst instincts of their supporters, with the objective to maximize D’Nations. I see people earning $340,000 in “executive compensation” in a year for doing what other people, like myself, do for nothing. That is in my opinion completely unacceptable and I will continue to oppose it.

Of course, if the SPLC was really opposed to White nationalism, then they would (indirectly of course) support the careers of the inept Quota Queens mentioned in this article, whose net contribution to the cause is best represented by a negative sign, and who stand in the way of a new and authentic pro-White movement. I suppose that all of the accusations are true that aver that the watchdog groups are themselves grifters (the mirror images of those they allegedly oppose) who create bogeymen out of pitiful failures in order to scare leftist suckers into contributing money. On the other hand, perhaps, by giving these “movement” idiots publicity as “dangerous extremists” and thus legitimizing them to their followers, the watchdog groups are indeed supporting the Quota Queens and thereby damaging White nationalism, a “win-win” situation for the watchdogs when coupled with the fundraising successes that the scare tactics enable.

Instead of attacking the beliefs of others, can the SPLC articulate a positive view of a society they would like to see, and convince others of it? That’s doubtful, as the multiracial, multicultural consensus slowly collapses and people don’t take that crap seriously anymore. On the other hand, Der Grifter Right is intellectually and morally bankrupt, so what we have is an ideological vacuum, leading to nihilism.

Movement Money Pit

The tin cup is overflowing.  In all cases, emphasis added.

See this; I friend of this blog forwarded that very interesting article.  Let us consider together. I will assume that all of the information listed below, and the tax form information from which it is derived, is accurate; if it is not, the groups mentioned should correct it. The ProPublica not-for-profit database is currently not updated with this information. I will first fisk the article and then make my main argument at the end.

For the second year in a row, the right wing’s favorite dark money donation vehicle has given an unprecedented sum to a notorious white nationalist hate group.

Putting aside the breathless, inflammatory verbiage (“dark money, notorious, hate”), the basic problem here is that most of the groups in question are NOT “white nationalist” but instead are “yellow supremacist” HBD “race realist” and/or immigration restriction-minded civic nationalist. Now, even though the groups in question are not White nationalist, they all are definitely part of Der Movement; note that I have been chronicling how Der Movement has been abandoning genuine, authentic White nationalism in favor of the emerging HBD-Nordicist-ethnonationalist-Amnat alliance that centers on the ideologies promoted by those non-WN “movement” groups. So there is no inconsistency in stating that they are not White nationalist but are part of Der Movement.

New tax records obtained by the Center for Media and Democracy (CMD) reveal that nonprofit charity DonorsTrust bankrolled the New Century Foundation—an alias for American Renaissance, a white nationalist organization led by Jared Taylor—with $600,000 in 2020.

Consider that very carefully the next time Amren rattles the tin cup.

That amount exceeds the New Century Foundation’s total annual revenue in any year since 2010.

They’re moving on up.

American Renaissance, which is designated by the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) as a white nationalist hate group, is Taylor’s online magazine and is known for creating the black-on-white crime myth…

It’s not a myth. It is based on official statistics, for example, those from the FBI.

…which has inspired terrorists including Dylann Roof to commit mass murder.

Nonsense.

“You don’t exactly need a PhD to understand why Jared Taylor is a white nationalist”…

I have a PhD, and I understand that Jared Taylor is NOT a White nationalist – he self-identifies as a “White advocate” and a “race realist” (i.e., a HBDer) and he has suggested that some people may view Amren as “yellow supremacist.” Amren conferences have featured Jews, Asian, and race mixers as speakers. I am a White nationalist, not Taylor.

…said Michael Edison Hayden, a senior investigative reporter and spokesperson for the SPLC. “He believes that Black people are less intelligent, less empathetic, and less human than white people. 

Well, that’s true, isn’t it?

He will tell you that with his own words and does so every day on his website, which is so grotesquely and openly racist I sometimes feel nauseated reading it.”

If by “openly racist” you mean animus against White ethnics, then yes, I’ve chronicled Amren attacks against (Southern) Italians, Hungarians, and Romanians at EGI Notes. Other than that, Amren is extremely mild, milquetoast, milksop stuff.  If it is nauseating, it is because the pro-Jewish and pro-Asian attitudes extant there. And if this idiot gets sickened by reading the weak sauce of Amren, then he’d probably keel over and drop dead after reading EGI Notes.

DonorsTrust is a fund associated with the Kochs, the Mercers, and other right-wing billionaire families. It is a donor-advised fund sponsor, meaning that it manages individual charitable accounts for its clients for a fee. These clients, who can hide their identities from the public by using DonorsTrust, “advise” DonorsTrust about where the money should go, but the organization has total legal authority to decide which organizations will receive funding.

They can give their money where they damn please. I don’t like the Quota Queens wasting money that could be used better elsewhere, but there’s no accounting for donor taste.

In 2020, DonorsTrust also gave $75,000 to the foundation behind the prominent white nationalist hate group VDARE, the tax records show. 

Stupid and factually incorrect breathless soyboy posturing. VDARE may be prominent in Der Movement but it is NOT “white nationalist” nor does it promote “hate.” If only that characterization was true, then I could support VDARE’s mission, but it is not true.

The previous year, as CMD first reported, DonorsTrust gave over $1.5 million to the VDARE Foundation. 

Well, there’s a lot of “executive compensation” needed there, no doubt.

The amount was far greater than the group’s previous annual revenue record and likely helped VDARE purchase a castle in West Virginia. 

So that’s where the money came from?

In total, VDARE took in a whopping $4.3 million in 2019, as CMD and the SPLC reported.

Remember that the next time Der Movement cries poverty, and tells you they can’t build a legal infrastructure because of financial reasons.

VDARE, led by Peter Brimelow, promotes the white genocide conspiracy theory…

It is not a conspiracy. Demographic change, which is celebrated by the Left, is an objective fact.

…a central tenet of white nationalism…

Brimelow is NOT a White nationalist.  He is an immigration restrictionist civic nationalist.  That is the agenda of VDARE, along with HBD “race realism.”

…has published apologia for white nationalist terrorists..

Nonsense.

…and regularly churns out anti-immigrant propaganda. 

So what? Immigration can legitimately be challenged. By the way, Brimelow was an immigrant, and Derbyshire was an illegal alien immigrant.  

“There’s ethnic specialization in crime,” said Brimelow at a 2017 event hosted by American Renaissance, “and Hispanics do specialize in rape, particularly of children. They’re very prone to it, compared to other groups.”

That’s true, isn’t it?

As the American conservative movement, inspired by the racism and conspiracy theories of former president Donald Trump…

If Trump is a “racist” then he’s one against White people, having taken their votes and doing nothing to help them, not even mentioning them as a group in any public address or comment, while foaming at the mouth about how much he and his administration helped every group but Whites.  And most of the “conspiracy theories” have turned out to be, likely, true.

…moves further and further to the right…

Yes, that “conservative movement,” and the GOP that serves as its vehicle, may even reach the point it was in the 1950s, under that radical Nazi Dwight Eisenhower and his Operation Wetback.  Truth is, the “American conservative movement” (sic), just like American society as a whole, has been moving left for decades. Any correction to that, however minor, is to be welcomed.

DonorsTrust has dramatically increased its funding of white nationalist hate groups. 

Name one such group, not including groups whose ideology contradicts authentic White nationalism.

Before 2019, the charity had not donated to such groups, although for some time it has been financing anti-Muslim, anti-immigrant, and anti-LGBTQ hate groups. 

Is the SPLC an anti-White hate group?

As CMD reported, the trend continued in 2020: DonorsTrust doled out large sums to the Center for Security Policy ($1.8 million), the David Horowitz Freedom Center (nearly $200,000), and the Pacific Justice Institute ($74,000), among other extremist organizations.

So, anyone to the right of you is an “extremist” peddling “hate.” Did you ever stop to consider that one reason that DonorsTrust has expanded its donations to groups you despise is that it is a response to the hateful leftist extremism of people like you, and of the SPLC?

DonorsTrust did not immediately respond to an emailed request for comment.

They are under no obligation to answer to the likes of you.

“DonorsTrust deserves all the scrutiny it can get for funding American Renaissance,” said SPLC’s Hayden. “

How about those who donate to the SPLC?  What kind of “scrutiny” do they “deserve?”

All Americans, regardless of race…

Lie. Don't speak for me, scumbag.

…suffer immensely when financial institutions lift up those who deem Black people to be subhuman…

Why should Americans suffer by truth being funded?  Doesn’t truth set you free?  I for one suffer by having to live among subhuman Blacks.

… It sets our country back by decades.”

Quite the opposite.  The problem is not the agenda Hayden fantasizes about.  If that agenda was actually being funded, and good work was being done with that money, then that would be beautiful. Unfortunately, what we have instead is money going to inept “race realist” and civic nationalist Quota Queens.

Other donor-advised fund sponsors finance white nationalist hate groups, but not nearly as generously as DonorsTrust. Some of the biggest charities in the nation have recently given money to the New Century Foundation, the VDARE Foundation, and other white nationalist organizations.

Again, you mendacious, lying, gaslighting, dishonest piece of utter filth, the New Century Foundation and the VDARE Foundation are NOT “white nationalist organizations.” In my opinion, what they stand for is antithetical to genuine White nationalism.

The National Philanthropic Trust donated to these two groups for the first time in 2020, giving $50,000 each to the New Century Foundation and the VDARE Foundation. Through a spokesperson, the trust evaded responsibility for its donations.

They are not obligated to explain their donations to the likes of you.

Our donors recommend grants that support a variety of organizations, all in good standing with the IRS, which may be on differing sides of a cause. NPT does not take a position on which causes our donors support however we carefully follow strict due diligence procedures to ensure compliance with all applicable laws and regulations. In accordance with NPT policy, we suspend grants to charities under investigation by any regulatory body that calls into question an organization’s ability to carry out a charitable mission.

That’s reasonable.

Other recent funders of white nationalist hate groups include the donors-advised fund sponsors linked to the Fidelity, Schwab, and Vanguard investment firms.

Interesting.  Why are they donating?  There are many possibilities here, some good, some not. Buying “insurance” in case things get “hot?” Co-opting genuine White nationalism by funding its intra-“movement” opposition?  A response to being shocked by the behavior of the Left over the past few years?  Who knows?

The people who should be interested in all of this is not hysterical leftists, but pro-White activists, who give their hard-earned money for “D’Nations” and who probably don’t know how well off the recipients of those donations are, and would be outraged by how little is being accomplished by all the money received.

I need to get in this racket; when I retire, I need to get on the “movement” gravy train!  Shilling for shekels!  Look at the chart at the end of the article.  Where’s my money?  My tin cup is empty. Oh the agony!

Now comes my main message, which is all 100% consistent with everything I have been writing about Der Movement and its finances over the last few years.  Der Movement loves to cry poverty, rattle the tin cup for “D’Nations,” engage in constant fundraising, excuse their endless failures by claiming a lack of funds and other resources, but, as you can see, in reality, they are doing quite well financially. They are certainly doing better than any of us, and certainly doing better than the masses of activists, some of whom who are not doing well, who shell out the shekels to pad Der Movement’s overflowing coffers.

The problem is not that Der Movement is making big money.  The problem is that they are making big money while:

• Constantly shilling for “D’Nations” from rank-and-file activists and putting forth the façade of being struggling, deplatformed, and defunded victims fighting a System in which virtually everyone is against them.
• Promoting ideologies that are hostile to, and in competition with, the pan-European White nationalism that I espouse.
• Accomplishing little of value for pro-White activism as a whole, taking resources away from potential activities that could be of value, while, in some cases, getting comfy “executive compensations” for doing things other people do for nothing.

There are serious consequences for this waste of money,  Consider the recent Unite the Right civil suit decision. The "movement" lacks an effective legal infrastructure in part because the financial resources are not available - and yet the Quota Queens are taking in "unprecedented sums" of money.  Do you see the problem?  

Odds and Ends, 8/24/21

In der news.

"Woke" corporations have made the calculation - the large numbers of Whites who oppose "wokeness" won't actually DO anything about it - other than private grumbling and watching FOX News. Such Whites will not protest, divest, boycott - they will never inflict financial and public relations pain on the corporations. On the other hand, Coloreds and their SJW "White allies" will always make noise - they WILL protest, divest, boycott. Combined with that hard-nosed - and realistic - calculation the fact that the corporations hire radicals on staff means that what you can expect is more of the same. Until Whites on the Right make as much noise as everyone else, they will be completely ignored. And don't think that a "Republican victory" in 2022 and/or 2024 will change anything - it won't. Don't depend on others to do what you are unwilling to do yourself.

I stopped watching the 1966 film Beau Geste  after it showed the cowardly and dishonest Italian Legionaire almost literally licking the boots - actually spit polishing in a servile fashion while ratting out the movie's hero - of the villainous French officer (played by Greek Teddy Savalas). The hero of the movie was an Anglo-American character played by Guy Stockwell. The movie was produced by Jew Walter Seltzer.

Meanwhile, the usual suspects will continue to spread nonsense about Jewish and Italian Hollywood partners making WASPs/Nordics look bad. 

See this. Both Oberst and Shaw seem to be very sincere, down-to-earth, good guys, and based on their comments, likely right-of-center politically. I have a better opinion of both of them than cuckervative Arnold and I don't want to say anything bad about either man.

That said, if they believe they have "freedom" in America, let them try and sell their homes with the stipulation "For Whites only" and get back to all of us how that goes. Or try and sell their products "for Whites only." Or come out publicly against BLM. Or any other opinion that supports absolute freedom of association, independent of "civil rights laws." Or they can refuse jury duty - after all, muh freedom!

In a relative sense, America might be slightly freer de jure than other nations, but in an absolute sense, and compared to the America of the past, we are not "free" at all. And with social pricing, de facto America may actually be less free than other nations. "Cancel culture" is a real thing (ironically enough in this case, with people "canceling" Arnold).

The last livestream confirms everything I've been saying about Counter-Currents. Consider the guests:

1. Taylor - the dean of "HBD race realism" whose site praises Jews and Asians while attacking Italians, Hungarians, and Romanians.

2. - Sam Dickson - friend and promoter of the Italian-hating Humphrey Ireland.

3. Jim Goad - lowbrow writer who frequently makes anti-Italian comments.

Counter-Currents continues to "out" itself (pun intended) as hostile to Italians and other so-called "White ethnics" and as a focal point of the HBD-Nordicist-ethnonationalist alliance.

But, hey, ignore the facts - otherwise you'll be labeled an insane paranoid piece of crap.

I doubt that the anti-racist watchdog groups really fear any of the Quota Queens; they just use them to scare Jews and White SJWs in order to get more fundraising donations. The watchdogs likely fear Trump and Carlson more than any "movement" "leader." They would fear most of all sane and rational White racial activists.

More right-wing Gab retardation is a Tik-Tok of a paranoid high truster "connecting the dots" that Glaxo-Pfizer "own the Wuhan lab." See this.

But, does anyone with half a brain even need that refutation? Let's see. What's the chance that a biological warfare lab in Communist China is going to be "owned" by "Western" globalist Big Pharma? Now, of course, the opposite is very possible - the USA would likely outsource is military production to China, but does any sane person believe that the Chinese are going to allow any "Westerners" within 1000 miles of their biowarfare? No, they'll just let stupid morons like wop dwarf Fauci fund them, but they are not "owned" by anyone. China owns us, not the other way around.

Also note how no one ever "connects the dots" about leading anti-vaxxers either being people with a financial interest in selling "natural remedies" or "herbal supplements" or owning websites about "hidden health information" or people having an emotional interest in blaming someone or something else for their children's autism.

Also note how statins and Adderall are somehow exempt from accusations of Big Pharma money-making. After all, fat and stupid landwhales need maintenance medication to support and prolong their useless fat-addled lives, and we all certainly can't interfere with that.  And, as well, those drugs are nice pills and not scary needles, so all the hard men of Der Right don't have to wet their pants over getting stuck in the shoulder with a "jab" for about two or three seconds.  Pathetic.

Movement Analysis, 4/18/21

In all cases, emphasis added.

Colin Liddell’s Affirmative Right website gives this summary of DeAnna/Hood/Kirkpatrick, which is where I learned of the association:

KEVIN DEANNA (AKA (((Gregory Hood))) and (((James Kirkpatrick))))

A key figure in the pre- and early Alt-Right. DeAnna was the founder of the on-campus activist group Youth for Western Civilization (defunct). He was, and probably still is, one of the writers most respected by Alt-Righters, publishing articles in Radix, Counter-Currents, and American Renaissance under the pen name "Gregory Hood," and articles in VDARE under the by-line (((James Kirkpatrick))).

He excels at extremely lucid, mid-brain commentary pieces generated by the hamster wheel of the American news cycle, rather than deeper and more profound essays. DeAnna's role in the early Alt-Right has come under the SPLC spotlight thanks to his relationship with top doxxer Katie McHugh, with whom he had a romantic connection for several years. This has revealed that DeAnna once had connections to various more mainstream Conservative sites and organisations.

It seems that Liddell learned of this from the SPLC website, a place that I myself do not quote from (see below, on my policy). However, since Liddell has already discussed it on his own "movement" website, it can now be analyzed here. It is already out there in "movement" discourse.

Let’s consider Katie McHugh.

Concurrently, she began dating Kevin DeAnna. The two met in July 2013, according to McHugh, at a going-away party in Alexandria, Virginia, for a mutual friend leaving a conservative group.

McHugh’s relationship with DeAnna had been her entrée into the alt-right, and she had absorbed DeAnna’s friends by osmosis. DeAnna had wanted to marry her, she said, but McHugh, though she loved him, had several major qualms in the relationship. He was a deeply unhappy person, she felt, in a life of racist activism that had made him too toxic for mainstream society; “I think just because he was trapped in the alt-right, didn’t see a way out, made him very unhappy,” she said. He once told McHugh not to choose the same path, she said, to turn back while she could. He felt it was too late for him, she said.

Now, that is hearsay. It is one person talking, not under oath, about another, to a third party. If it is false, then it is defamation against DeAnna by McHugh. If it is true, then it is very disturbing that a very prominent “movement” activist has, or at least had, at one time, the belief that involvement in pro-White activism was a mistake that others should not make. Note that my own warnings against the "movement" is specifically about Der Movement, Inc. and not against activism itself. And, anyway, I'm not a "movement" "leader" encouraging others to get involved in Der Movement while at the same time privately decrying it. But, we do not know if McHugh's comments are accurate or not.

One thing that I believe that no one argues against is that the DeAnna-McHugh relationship was real. McHugh is a person of low character to have revealed all of this private information (to the extent that it is true; however, even if it is not true, it is still publicly humiliating to all involved) to the opposition, and it is very disturbing that such a person so easily and seamlessly entered high levels of the “movement.”  Although the Irish are considered “lower” than Inner Hajnal Germanics, they are still Northwest Europeans and so there’s a strong dose of affirmative action for them as well.

Bannon (see below, for more hearsay)  is Irish and Brimelow married a "Lydia Sullivan" - an analysis here - so the Irish seem to be considered a higher form of specimen compared to the two-foot-tall superstitious Afrowops sliding around on their skin grease and hair oils. We must remember that the Irish are, after all, a "100% Nordish" "assimilable minority."

Their differences went deeper — and stranger — than that, and allowed McHugh to see inside a truly bizarre subculture. McHugh was a Catholic, while DeAnna was a member of the Wolves of Vinland, a group based near Lynchburg that was focused around a neopagan theology based on self-improvement and feats of strength, as well as coded white nationalism. The idea was to cast off the bounds of modern Judeo-Christian society and find a way back to pre-Christian northern-European culture. 

Sigh. What gives any of these people the right to talk about “optics” with respect to anyone else?

McHugh sometimes accompanied DeAnna on weekend trips down to the Wolves’ headquarters for what they called a “moot” — a ceremony in which the assembled Wolves would smear ash on their bodies around a fire and give what McHugh described as “dramatic speeches” about self-sufficiency and relying on the other group members. They would then sit around the fire and drink beers.

Again, this is hearsay. But, let us assume it is true. Is that the “leadership” of your “movement?”

According to their argument, they can’t be white supremacists because they say that Jews and people of East Asian descent have a higher average IQ. This both whitewashes their bigotry and feeds into the alt-right’s victim mentality, especially as it relates to Jews.

Well, that’s consistent with some of the things I’ve been saying about the HBDers. They don't want to just come out and be pro-White, thus they grovel to Jews and East Asians.

McHugh never told her bosses about her ties to people like Brimelow…In 2015, McHugh says, she witnessed an encounter between Bannon and the white nationalist activist Devin Saucier at Breitbart’s party following CPAC that has stuck in her memory as a sign of just how permissive Bannon was willing to be. At the time she was good friends with Saucier, who has edited for Taylor’s publication American Renaissance under a pen name and who, in 2017, wrote a pseudonymous article titled “Why I Am (Among Other Things) A White Nationalist.” Taylor calls himself a “white advocate” and has written, “When blacks are left entirely to their own devices, Western civilization — any kind of civilization — disappears." McHugh brought Saucier along to the party.

As McHugh recalls it, Bannon looked at Saucier, sizing him up. He asked, “Who do you work for? Peter?” referring to Brimelow. Saucier, smiling, said no. Bannon said, “Far to the right, right?” Saucier responded in the affirmative. “AmRen? American Renaissance?” Saucier said, “Yes, sir,” and Bannon put his hand on his shoulder and said, “Well, we’re all fighting the same fight.”

And here we are in 2021, with everything collapsed and things worse than ever. They really fought that fight effectively, huh?  Are you in any way surprised?

More on the Katie McHugh fiasco.

Former Breitbart editor Katie McHugh's voyage from politically incorrect mini-celebrity to Southern Poverty Law Center informant provided plenty of sensationalist media last month. 

Again, that a person of such low character was so easily and quickly accepted in the “movement” tells you much. On the other hand, in contrast, there is a cordon sanitaire around the “insane” Sallis.  You figure it out.

The 29-year-old McHugh, who is based out of Oakton, Virginia…

Oakton, Virginia, eh? The nexus of power!  The central node of "movement" reality!  Hail HBD!

…decided to publicly come out as the person who violated her friends and colleagues' trust, likely in pursuit of a Christian Picciolini style "deradicalization" career. 

Picciolini being the Arab-looking coastal guinea whose ancestry was that to which purebred mountain wop Conte favorably compared his own.

According to McHugh's narrative, rehashed in a recent Slate podcast, she was being "radicalized" by members of the Trump administration, paleo-conservatives and alt-rights. McHugh goes further by claiming to have been a victim of peer pressure and a cult-like environment.

So, a person with no strong views, a shallow “activist” so weakly converted, entered the high levels of your “movement.”

After a dozen interviews with people who knew Katie McHugh personally from 2015-18 and scores of emails we have reviewed, National Justice can report that Katie McHugh has left out big details in her story, particularly a case where she personally entrapped unknowing people in an event she organized, who she later sold out to left-wing political police.

Again, it is a question of character.

McHugh is reported to have given every email, every phone number and every text message she ever received during this period to opposition researchers and political police, like Rosie Gray and the SPLC.

There is no hard evidence, but sources close to McHugh speculate she may have received a 5-figure sum for these private communications.  

Disgusting. That’s enough about that. No accountability for any of the people responsible for bringing this creature into Der Movement.

Doing research about the freaks of Der Movement, I came across a lot of information that will not be specifically discussed, in any detail, here at the present time. My policy is that I discuss two types of information concerning the “movement.” First, anything that is reported in the mainstream media is obviously reasonable to discuss; it is in the general public domain. Buzzfeed can be considered part of the mainstream media, on the online periphery. Second, anything that is reported on the Far Right, broadly defined, is also reasonable to discuss, since it is already openly in the “movement” domain. Thus, reading Colin Liddell’s Affirmative Right website, I found out about the Hood-DeAnna connection. Daniel Friberg brought to the general attention of the “movement” the Pilleater tape, and Friberg and Forney (with Liddell) openly discussed Polignano’s comments about Johnson. National Justice fits here as well.

On the other hand, information directly coming from anti-White, hard-Left activists, even though this can be found online, will not be discussed here. My “take” is that it would be better if none of this be made public. It would have been better if all of the abovementioned material had never come to light, but if it has already come out in the mainstream, or in the “movement,” then the milk has already been spilled, so to speak, and the issues can be addressed. But if the Far Left and the “watchdog” groups spill milk, I do not believe that any attention should be focused on it. I'm not going to be the first one to do it. However, if that information is picked up by the mainstream media, or disseminated by “movement” gossips, I have no control over that; in that case, the milk is obviously very publicly spilled, and, once again, it will be discussed here, if it is relevant. With respect to private things of significance that I know of from my own personal experiences in the “movement,” I will not discuss those matters here.

The only general, non-specific, comments I will make about all of this at the current time is that it is somewhat interesting how many “different” “movement” writers and personages are actually the same person writing under different pseudonyms. There are probably more such instances than just the ones breathlessly reported by the Reds. You also have people who write articles about operational security and then who leave links between all of their pseudonyms and between those pseudonyms and their IRL activity, thus being outed by the opposition.  Finally, I note that while Der Movement hates White ethnics, particularly Southern Europeans, Hispanics, including those with New World admixture, are A-OK.

But, then, do you expect Der Movement to make any sense whatsoever?

Interestingly, it seems to me that Der Movement is becoming increasing less tolerant of, and increasingly hostile to, White ethnics, particularly Southern Europeans. Der Movement has always been hostile to these people but, in a relative sense, I believe that Der Movement was the most tolerant of White ethnics in the years 1995-2010. Der Movement was generally completely dismissive of, and hostile to, White ethnics before 1995, and has been becoming more and more hostile since 2010. The pre-1995 attitude was the usual WN 1.0 Nordicism, with a superficial veneer of pan-Europeanism in some quarters from 1995-2010 to pad memberships and donations, and then the increasing hostility since 2010, which needs to be considered. 

There is a correlation between the increasing post-2010 hostility and the rise of the Alt Right. I usually refute the leftist paradigm that pro-White activists are motivated by emotional problems and a search for identity, and are people who have nothing else going for them other than their attachment to "whiteness." However, while that paradigm was clearly false for WN 1.0, I wonder if it does have some validity for WN 2.0. The Alt Right seems to have been enriched with younger Type I ethnic fetishists, people who indeed seem involved in activism to make up for personal deficiencies and who have little else other than their racial identities. Thus, among the majority of these "activists" who are Herrenvolk, there's a tendency toward an exaggerated Nordicism, and a navel-gazing focus on their own ethnicity. We can then understand why hostility toward non-Nordic Europeans, fueled by the  narcissism of small differences, is increasing since the rise of WN 2.0 (including the failed Alt Right). At the same time, even during the 1995-2010 period, there was always a strong undercurrent of Nordicism, including active WN 1.0 Nordicists, and these types were always looking for opportunities for a resurgence. The HBD-Nordicist-ethnonationalist alliance of WN 2.0, centered on the Alt Right, provided that opportunity.

Let’s consider Saturday’s Johnson-Taylor milksop interview (4/17/21). I call that interview "milksop" because it was completely weak and non-confrontational in every aspect; by a sportsball analogy, it was the equivalent of "batting practice."

Let’s consider the major memes they promoted in that interview:

1. Let’s just go back to the “traditional America” – all the policies that ultimately, and quickly, failed and were completely reversed. And let’s praise the fraud Rushton as well.

2. And then we have the promotion of HBD. The problem is that “White racial consciousness” is not fully compatible with HBD (see below).

3. They discussed: How have White people been tricked? The word “Jew” wasn’t uttered in that interview. Not one time. Surprise! Let’s reference Michael Woodley, but not Kevin MacDonald (the Jewish work, not the HBD Nordicism). Surprise!

4. Then Johnson does his usual gaslighting about Taylor’s groveling to Asians. The coward Johnson refuses to debate individuals such as myself, or to directly engage with the ideas here at EGI Notes. The coward Johnson also fails to challenge Taylor’s comments about blanket Asian superiority, such as:

I think Asians are objectively superior to whites by just about any measure that you can come up with in terms of what are the ingredients for a successful society.

There’s no need to make outlandish (and historically inaccurate) statements like that in order to make the simple point that Asian success in America disproves the idea of a “White supremacist America.”

My counter-argument to Johnson’s gaslighting is here. Instead of directly addressing that, the limited-mentality coward Johnson simply repeats the same points over and over again. It’s like listening to an obsessive compulsive retard.

I call Johnson out as a no-character coward; I call out all of these people for refusing to debate, for refusing to engage. The same argument they make about the System – “the Left wants to censor us because they can’t win the argument” – can be used by myself against Johnson and all the rest. They have to censor and avoid debate because they have zero confidence in their own arguments.

Oh, and yes, the pro-Asian arguments of Taylor don’t have “political significance” – is that why Derbyshire (and his Arctic Alliance nonsense) is given a forum at Amren conferences?

5. The Asian-Black alliance – “Asians were sensible” (repeated at least three times) – sure they were. Taylor was surprised by anti-White attitudes among Asians. I was not. I have been preaching for years the idea that the existential meaning of Asians is hatred of Whites. I have turned out to be right, and Taylor wrong. At some point, the rank-and-file need to recognize who is always right and who is always wrong. 

Taylor said that he “needs to dig deeper” into the problem.  Yeah…how about that Asians are a tropical colored people who have an innate racial animus toward Whites and toward Western civilization?

Is that "deep" enough? Keep on digging!  Maybe, at some point, your hobbit hole tunnel will reach into EGI Notes and you'll find some enlightenment.