Sallis Right Again: Political Population Genetics
And other news.
Another example of the politicization of science:
Isolation-by-distance models are part of the institutional creed of antiracialism used to critique claims of biological race concepts (BRCs). Proponents of antiracialism appeal to isolation-by-distance models to describe patterns of human genetic differences among and between groups as a function of distance. Isolation by distance has been referred to as the pattern that human genetic variation fits, distributing the differences we see as race throughout geographic space as a series of Gaussian gradients. Contemporary scientific critiques of BRCs fuse social constructionist race concepts with a description of the distribution of proportions of human genetic variation in geographic space as a function of distance. These two points are often followed by statements noting that there is only one human race... To address the shortcomings in the scientific critique of race, the author proposes combining Du Boisian demography with Darwinian evolutionary biology. From a Du Boisian demographic perspective, race is a product of racism, or race/ism, and is a heredity and inheritance system based on rules of partus sequitur ventrem and hypodescent. Race marks individuals and groups them to reproduce unequal relationships into which Europeans co-opted them. This synthesis propounds a new racial formation theory to understand the more general consequences of racism on genes and health outcomes.
This is an admission that much of modern population genetics, and pseudoscientific denials of racial reality, is based on “the institutional creed of antiracialism,” and not on genuine scientific empiricism.
...the differences we see as race throughout geographic space as a series of Gaussian gradients. Contemporary scientific critiques of BRCs fuse social constructionist race concepts with a description of the distribution of proportions of human genetic variation in geographic space as a function of distance.
Ignoring clustering and ignoring the ability of definitively assign race based on genetic data or on forensic anthropology.
To address the shortcomings in the scientific critique of race, the author proposes combining Du Boisian demography with Darwinian evolutionary biology.
"Du Boisian demography?" Do you need any more evidence that the “scientific” establishment has been completely co-opted by SJW lunacy and by Colored radicalism?
Everything I’ve ever written about the political objectives of population genetics is verified. And, by the way, do you think that “testing companies,” with their known biases and leaked admission of “owning racists” by fudging results, are immune to this politicization?
The pseudoscience of the Left mirrors that of the Right (e.g., HBD) - they start out with the desired conclusion and then work backward to try and justify it.
Should there be treason trials for selected HBDers? Is there any way of connecting their activity to aiding China levying war against the United States?
The HBDers need to “pay” as well.
Considering all of the prominent HBDers, isn't it interesting that there is a correlation between promoting HBD and having one or more of the following characteristics:
1. Being critical and/or opposed to White nationalism
2. Consumed with hostility toward pan-Europeanism
3. Being of non-European ancestry and/or married to someone of non-European ancestry
4. Promoting one or more of the following: miscegenation, aracial citizenism, cognitive elitist IQ nationalism, pseudoscience
5. Open disdain for White ethnics, typically combined with worship of Jews and East Asians
6. Innate hostility for any memes that unite Europeans and innate tropism toward any memes that divide Europeans
7. Being "socially awkward" or some other type of mattoid, including defending child porn
Read this, and remember that the Quota Queens deny that the affirmative action program exists.
I’m surprised that we have not yet heard from Der Movement that all of the UFOs in the news are actually Nazi flying saucers from Antarctica.
What hypocrisy. In Hungary, no less. Remember this:
Author Marisa Abrajano, whose origins we can only imagine from her name and appearance, teaches political science at UC San Diego. Zoltan Hajnal also teaches at UC San Diego. Zoltan is a Hungarian name, so it’s unlikely his ancestors came over on the Mayflower. White Backlash is published by Princeton University Press.
This is the perfect symbol for our degenerate times. Foreigners tell the American founding stock how benighted and deserving of oblivion we are, and are published by one of the country’s most prestigious academic presses. We have work to do.
Maybe Hungarians should not have foreigners in their nation preaching to them about “European Brotherhood” while in reality opposing that “brotherhood” in their own nations.
A telling admission from the new Counter-Currents:
Nick JeelvyMay 31, 2021 at 2:30 pm
I must admit I had no idea what the point of this article was while I was writing it…
And that’s an article behind their paywall! You just can’t make this stuff up.
Labels: anti-racism, Counter Currents, HBD, HBD as a political movement, HBD realities, movement's ethnic affirmative action program, population genetics, pseudoscience, reality of race, science and technics
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home