Against HBD Filth, 10/1/21

Against HBD scum.

HBDers start whining when their own ethnies are targeted. Other folks though are fair game.

Med Europe (490/99) – based on Spain, Portugal, Italy results. In a way, one can see the Euro crisis – which is mostly affecting the PIGS – as the invisible hand’s way of bumping down the Med countries to a level more in line with their lower human capital (relative to the Germanic countries).

And this outrageous lie, not supported by genetic data:

Turks and Greeks genetically similar.

And of course.

HBDers weep.

Derbyshire weeps; the genetic facts.

Another surprise was that the engineered mice had less breast tissue, meaning that EDAR could be the reason that East Asian women have generally smaller breasts.

Well, if “generally” you mean that the typical East Asian woman has the body of pre-pubescent boy, then, yes.

East Asians are sometimes assumed to have evolved in a cold environment because of their narrow nostrils, which conserve heat, and the extra eyelid fat that insulates the eye. But the Broad team calculates that the EDAR variant arose about 35,000 years ago in central China and that the region was then quite warm and humid. Extra sweat glands would have been advantageous to the hunter-gatherers who lived at that time.

East Asians – a TROPICAL, global south people, with cheating and manipulation of their “PISA scores.”

The execrable HBD Nordicist site The Occidental Observer is using a Negro-Herrenvolk alliance to defame (Southern) Italians once again.

First of all TOO scum, these “IQ differences” do not exist with respect to currently available actual IQ data.

…our results demonstrate quite clearly that raw scores [on Raven's Coloured Progressive Matrices] of children from Sicily are not lower than those [of children from the North and Central-South] reported by Cornoldi et al. (2010). On the contrary, they are sometimes higher…Naglieri et al. (submitted for publication) studied the differences between the psychometric qualities of the CAS [Cognitive Assessment System] for the Italian and US standardization samples. Although the goal of that study was not to make regional comparisons, they did report that there were no significant differences (F(1, 806)=2.19, p=.11) between the average CAS-Italian Full Scale standard scores (set at a mean of 100 and standard deviation of 15) for students from the northern (M=100.5; SD=13.2), central (M=101.2; SD=11.9), and southern (M=103.1; SD=11.6) regions of Italy. The mean standard scores for the students in the north were only slightly lower than the mean for those in the south (effect size=.21). These results suggest that a test of intelligence that measures basic neuropsychological processes, and does not include academically laden verbal and quantitative tests, yields small differences between the regional groups. These findings also amplify the importance of measuring intelligence directly when comparing groups and argue against using reading, math and science test scores as "proxies for intelligence" (Lynn, 2010a).

Second of all, TOO filth, using E1b1b as some sort of quantitative measure of historic admixture from the Middle/Near East or North Africa (MENA) is absurd; those measures require autosomal data. Never mind that carriers of that NRY include: John C. Calhoun, the Wright brothers, Lyndon Johnson, Napoleon and Hitler, William Harvey, and David Attenborough – hardly Southern Italians. Were they all admixed with MENA?

To demonstrate Lynn’s lack of logic, consider the following. If one thinks that NRY such as E1b1b directly correlates with “admixture” then the peoples of the Balkans are, via Lynn’s “reasoning,” highly admixed with MENA people. But there is no evidence of this from autosomal data; in PCA, Balkanoids (as well as S. Italians, by the way) are found exactly where one would expect to find them with the “genes mirror geography” paradigm. These people are not being pulled toward MENA populations in any manner independent of normal genetic clines that track with geography. Further, there are no unsupervised admixture data that I am aware of that supports such MENA admixture.

Also, even if we take Lynn’s IQ “estimates” at face value, to ascribe the IQ differences (10 points or more) to MENA admixture would necessitate at least 50% MENA admixture or a MENA IQ of 60 or some strange non-linear dominant negative effects of “low IQ alleles.” There is absolutely no evidence for any of that; thus, the “math” doesn’t add up to ascribe alleged intra-European IQ differences to MENA admixture.

Lynn is a pseudoscientific fraud. He commits the most obvious flaw of pseudoscience – he starts out with his desired conclusion and then works backward with cherry picked and misinterpreted data, and bizarre conclusions, and therefore “justifies” his own hypotheses. That TOO publicizes this trash underscores what a trashy, pseudoscientific site it itself is. Lynn’s Italian IQ ideas fail the fact test, the data interpretation test, and the logic test.

See this about Chinese IQ. The Lynn fraud continues to be uncovered. Also see this.

This new white nationalism tried to put on a happy face, but unfortunately it had embraced a prejudice just as irrational and just as dangerous as the white leftist obsession with mass non-white immigration. By disassociating themselves from the more aggressive white racialists of the past, who typically subscribed to the view that whites occupied the highest plane of evolutionary development, it was believed that white nationalists would be able to pursue their own agenda in relative peace. Under the cloak of Asian supremacy, race-oriented differential psychologists would be able to further consolidate their research on negro intellectual inferiority without having to endure constant leftist taunts of “white supremacist!” or “Nazi!”

The shift from white intellectual superiority to Oriental intellectual superiority in the late 1970’s was a last-ditch effort at ideological and racial self-defense in the face of overwhelming odds. White nationalists, the ideological inheritors of the traditional conservative establishment, had their backs up against a wall. The primary white nationalist imperative was to ensure white racial survival. Placing East Asians at the top of the racial hierarchy, despite all of the earlier historical, biological, anthropological, craniometric and paleontological evidence that had been adduced in favor of white superiority, was supposed to allow them to pursue this primary directive without being molested by a leftist-controlled establishment determined to snuff out all dissenting opinion. East Asians were chosen for this role because they were, under the old racial hierarchy, almost as evolved as whites, unlike the other races who were viewed as closer to the more primitive Homo erectus or, in Darwin’s time, the gorilla. In continuing to make this choice, Richard Lynn fans are confronted with a dilemma: if East Asians are so superior, why bother focusing on preservation of the white race? Shouldn’t the best genes be allowed to survive and propagate? If this is the case, whites should make way for an East Asian world by diluting themselves out of existence through non-white immigration and miscegenation. Whatever its short-term goals, in the long run, advocacy of Oriental racial superiority is the logic of white genocide on a large scale.

Getting back to the anti-White HBD Nordicist trash site The Occidental Observer, note how they work with Negroes to leverage the "work" of China-worshipping pseudoscientists to racially defame non-Herrenvolk European ethnies. As the quote above suggests, Amren/Taylor as well as TOO/MacDonald are race traitors supporting "the logic of white genocide on a large scale."

This is surprisingly sensible. It goes against Traditionalist Golden Age nonsense, as well as Guntherite Nordicism. Practically speaking, we need racial separation, genetic isolation, combined with judicious eugenics. Over time, there will be more racial divergence; hence, purity.