Low Hanging Fruit

Another failure of Der Movement.

Is the “movement” taking advantage of the opportunities that current conditions offer to recruit disaffected Whites who are facing problems and dangers greater than ever before, and who are bereft of any real leadership –  they have false “leaders” who constantly betray them and who offer to them no consideration, no real solutions to their problems.

Is the “movement” picking the low hanging fruit of all these potential recruits who seem ripe for more radical solutions to the problems they face?

It is true that the “movement” has made efforts to target this large population of disaffected, downwardly mobile young White men, which is appropriate. The problem, however is how this was done, as outlined here. Instead of exemplifying leadership and real direction, challenging the youth, the “movement” instead pandered to the worst aspects of youth behavior, catering to the most degenerate aspects of youth culture. The Alt Right was the vehicle by which the “movement” tried to reach out to young White men, and the collapse of the Alt Right has done enormous damage to the legitimacy of the “movement” and its outreach to the young White male target population. So, this is low hanging fruit that was picked and essentially thrown away.

Is the “movement” making a serious, concerted effort to reach out to suffering, downwardly mobile, disaffected Whites in West Virginia, in the Rust Belt? The answer is – NO.  Do we believe that lower middle class, working class, blue collar, and poor Whites care about, or would be attracted to, The Homo and the Negro, My Nationalist Pony, homosexualism and anti-natalism, Kali Yuga and “traditionalism,” calipers and cephalic indices, inaccurate ancestry testing and calculating statistically imprecise “admixture percentages” to ten significant digits, March of the Titans, Savitri Devi, or any imbecilic “movement” nonsense? No, of course not. What we have in front of us is an unprecedented opportunity of the low hanging fruit of many millions of desperate and disaffected White Americans, and all the Quota Queen grifters can do is gibber about irrelevant stupidities and then rattle the tin cup for “D’Nations.”  And speaking of the endless “movement” quest for “fundraising," what will money-strapped working class Whites think of some smug blue state immigrant earning $340,000+ in a single year as “executive compensation” for maintaining an “online publication?” Can the moronic “movement” do more to repel these people if they actively tried?

Speaking of repelling potential recruits, we now need to move on to the question of the White ethnics, particularly those situated in urban areas and those living in suburban America, who have ended up there because their families had fled urban America in the great White Flight of the past few decades. These people were essentially driven out of the cities by Colored behavior, enabled by scum like John Lindsay, who hated the White ethnics.

The charismatic Lindsay became a Rorschach test for how one saw New York in the ‘60s and ‘70s, and maybe for the nation in that entire era. Liberal journalist Jack Newfield, a Lindsay admirer, put it this way in his 2000 obituary: “Lindsay was great on race, but not so great on class. He lacked a certain empathy for the white ethnic communities of the city ... The mayor who wanted reconciliation so deeply accidentally created contention and white backlash.”

Who stood up against Negroes in the Newark riots? Who has formed the backbone of “conservative Republican” politics in the Northeast USA for decades, and who has been bitterly betrayed by the GOP in that time? These people get it from all sides. To the general society, first they were “not White enough” and now they are part of “White Supremacy” and “White Privilege.”  They are scorned as low-class, uncouth White bigots by the Anglo-Jewish globalist class, looked down upon by John Lindsay-style Colored-worshipping elite snobs, hated as White racists by Coloreds, and treated with disdain by the “movement” for being “racial inferior” “Outer Hajnal” “mongrels.” These put-upon White ethnics, buffeted by social trends since the day their ancestors stepped off the boat, are hit from all directions, people once labeled by George Wallace as “folks who talk like me but with a New York accent” – these people would flock to a genuinely pan-European pro-White racial movement in which they would be treated with respect as full-fledged equal partners.  

But, instead, the “movement” does everything in its power to reject and alienate these people, and modern day Lindsay-types of the Right, gibber incoherently about “pushy newcomers” while at the same time, literally being in bed with Jews and South Asians (who actually are pushy newcomers). And then you have the folks who critique Italians, Romanians, and Hungarians, but who (almost literally worship Jews and East Asians). Laughably, while at the same time promoting HBD-Nordicist theories suggesting that the White ethnics are inherently more ethnocentric and collectivist than the “movement’s: favorite Herrenvolk, the “movement” ignores and/or alienates the ethnics while putting all their eggs in the basket of emphasizing recruitment of people the HBD-Nordicists describe as individualistic and non-ethnocentric.  Does that make any sense?

Can we think of any other wasted opportunity to equal this?  And one cannot simply excuse the “movement” by simply ascribing their behavior to an ideological (e.g., Nordicist) ingroup choice, since they pretend to be pan-European/pan-Aryan. These are the same people who constantly bang the drum about “big tent” and yet they repel and alienate people who could be among their strongest supporters.

In summary, the “movement” is wasting one monumental opportunity after another, either leaving low hanging fruit on the tree, or picking the fruit and essentially letting it rot and throwing it away.