The Sallis Vision

Endgame.

All men dream: but not equally. Those who dream by night in the dusty recesses of their minds wake in the day to find that it was vanity: but the dreamers of the day are dangerous men, for they may act their dreams with open eyes, to make it possible. - T. E. Lawrence

My critics may aver that I am always negative and do not do anything other than criticize the “movement.”  Long time readers of my work know that is not true.  Regardless, in this post, I will stress the positive, the constructive, and sketch an outline of what my endgame is. In other words, what is the Sallis vision?  What kind of state do I want to see come into being?  What kind of future do I envision for the White race?

A starting point would be to read this.

Let us proceed.

Pan-Europeanism, Political structure

Unlike the “movement” I support genuine pan-Europeanism, focusing on the interests of ALL peoples of European descent worldwide, not just some fraction thereof (i.e., Northwest Europeans only - typical “movement” Nordicism).  ALL means ALL, not just the “movement’s” favorite groups. There will be no intra-European castes, no “borderline” cases or grudging acceptances, no second or third (or worse) class status. There needs to be a clearly defined ingroup, and then the ingroup is the ingroup. All for one and one for all. If the fetishists cannot accept that, then we will not accept them.  On the other hand, the “movement’s” embrace of non-Whites (that they do while at the same time rejecting White ethnics) is not acceptable. Ourselves alone. Non-Whites have their own lands.

There will be an integrated Imperium structure, optimally consisting of all of Europe (including European Russia), as well as most or all (depending on what occurs) of Diaspora lands (USA, Canada, Australia, New Zealand – perhaps parts of South Africa as well).  Similar to Lowell’s Imperium vs. Dominion distinction, there will be a balance between those issues dealt with at the higher level of Imperium (high politics and grand strategy, foreign policy, military policy, large scale science and technics [including space exploration], racial policy [including immigration control as well as eugenics], pan-European cultural projects [including civilizational/High Culture issues], and whatever economic [in the broadest sense) issues arise).  On the other hand, there will be local sovereignty (Dominion) on most day-to-day issues, without the nitpicking micromanagement of the EU. National boundaries will be maintained and the demographics of nations and peoples also maintained – there will be no panmixia among the nations of Europe; local national ethnic and cultural identities will be maintained (although of course there will be some intra-European mixing in the Diaspora, as has been already occurring).

Interestingly, a Sallisian Imperium would exhibit more national sovereignty and homogeneity than the behavior of so-called ethnonationalists. My Imperium would not have non-Hungarians using Budapest as a flophouse and crash pad and would not have anti-Romanian aliens living in Romania, bedding Romanian women while attacking the Romanian people and culture. There will be none of the ethnomimperialist hypocrisy of "ethnonationalist sovereignty and homogeneity for me but not for thee." The Imperium would be a Confederation of European peoples and nations.

The underlying political structure will be of a National Socialist/fascist type, but with a sane and flexible manifestation (see below).  Aspects of “totalitarian democracy” can be useful here.

Sanity and flexibility

National Socialism and fascism are linked in the popular mind to war, concentration camps, secret police, cults of personality, etc. I propose a “sane” form of National Socialist fascism in which war is restricted to self-defense (or some other type of defense of vital interests), order is maintained as reasonably as possible, freedom is maximized to the extent possible while maintaining collective action, and the Imperium is managed by a leadership cadre rather than some personality cult "Fuhrer.”

This form of government needs to be flexible enough to conform to the particularities of specific national cultures and mores.  For example, Russian national socialism, or that of many continental European nations, could be somewhat more authoritarian that that of Anglophone countries, where the populations and political culture has always been characterized by a greater degree of personal freedom and balance of power within the government.  The former nations would also tend to be more amenable to a highly centralized national government, while the latter may be more comfortable with a degree of decentralization. In all cases, the same basic ideology and the same political foundation would apply, all ultimately overseen by the Imperium’s elite, but in the degree of local sovereignty there would be the aforementioned flexibility in precisely how the political control would manifest.

Race and eugenics

The state would be for people of European descent only; in Europe in ethnically homogeneous states, and in the Diaspora in the mixed European states that exist, but with all non-Whites removed. Eugenics would be practiced, but in a sane and responsible way, preserving national identities and genetic interests to the extent possible, and rejecting rapid “transhumanist” changes. Populations do change over time due to a variety of reasons even in the absence of mass migration (e.g., from selection and/or genetic drift) and these mechanisms are wholly compatible with genetic interests in evolved populations (indeed, such interests are tied to adaptive fitness, which at times requires some changes in genotypes/phenotypes). Thus, a prudent eugenics policy that is also broadly preservationist is reasonable. See this on Yockeyian Genetics. I agree with Strom, racial purity is something to strive for in the future, it is not something that existed in a mythical past.

Ethics and morality

We need to build The New Man:

And it is even more salient today. If there is ONE single thing I would advise White racial activists to do today, it would be to emphasize, to focus on, character and moral rebirth, to focus on The New Man.  With that, anything is possible. Without that, nothing is possible. Although ideology, science, intelligence, strategy, et al. are all crucially important, they take a back seat to character and moral integrity.  You cannot build a worldwide revolutionary movement on a foundation of quicksand; you cannot build a victorious movement on a foundation of freaks, grifters, phonies, frauds, the morally defective, perverts, liars, gaslighters, deranged fetishists, tin-foil-hat conspiracy theorists, individuals with all sorts of completely superfluous hang-ups and bizarre theories, weaklings, traitors, and all the rest. We have to remake ourselves before we try and remake the world.

The New Man will be the foundation of the moral and ethical state:

There needs to be a moral structure to the state, independent of pure adaptive utilitarianism. Now, that moral structure can (and should) be used instrumentally to favor adaptive, EGI-focused ends. But the moral structure should exist not only for the purpose of promoting a racial state and for making the pursuit of EGI, of adaptive fitness, more palatable to the population – keeping in mind that humans are apparently evolved to benefit from some sort of religious/spiritual beliefs – but has benefits in its own right. Indeed, there needs to be a balance between a "pure ethic" of unrestrained pursuit of genetic interests, and morality that constrains the unrestrained pursuit of absolute EGI, a pursuit that can lead to “maladaptive genetic atomization.”....

…What can we say about this sense of morality?

Morality can be independent of religion, although, historically, in the Western civilization (and in Late Antiquity), The Moral State was associated with Christianity. Readers of this blog know that I am hostile to Christianity. However, there are certain elements in (Europeanized) Christianity that can be of benefit to society if – and only if – these ideals are limited to one’s own people, rather than to all of humanity (in other words, particularism vs. universalism), and are tempered by adaptive interests and pragmatic prudence.

Science and Technics, Futurism, anti-Traditionalism, but with maintenance of Humanity

Readers know I strongly support science and technics, embrace Futurism, and loathe “Traditionalism.”  The Sallisian state would look to the future, not to the past, and would enthusiastically support advances in science and technics and indeed all in forms of knowledge. The stupid embrace of “Traditionalism” by the “movement,” if manifested in a state system, would result in Luddite backwardness, the destruction of the hope for a brighter tomorrow, eliminate the possibility of a higher humanity, and leave us at the mercy of enemies, like the Asians, who have no scruples in using whatever techniques to achieve power and domination. Thus, “Traditionalism” is a deadly danger.

But there is another danger – that of hyper-rationality, of becoming so obsessed with science and, especially, technics, that we lose our humanity, confusing means with ends.  And here I do not only mean "transhumanism” or “AI takes over and kills off humanity” scenarios, but also Last Man” outcomes such as in The Machine Stops, or the cost of hyper-rationality in the “tale of the machines” in Gene Wolfe’s The Book of The New Sun -see here:

To paraphrase and summarize – humanity reached the stars by giving away the wild part of themselves – essentially becoming emotionless technocrats – and then the thinking machines (AI), who hated their human creators, decided to ruin those human creators by re-introducing to humanity paradigms that would rekindle humanity’s interest in those “wild things.” Thus, humanity became distracted away from pure science and technics and the galactic empire collapsed.  The lesson here is that – besides not trusting AI – humanity should not give up its “wild” side, its human soul, for the sake of technology; instead, humans need to achieve their objectives – “reach the stars” – while remaining fundamentally human. Thus, in relation of Heidegger’s whining, we need not become entrapped into a technological spiritual mindset – pure instrumentality – in order to “be scientific.”  On the other hand, we cannot evade the price that must be paid for science and technology – while science is a tool, it is an expensive tool, and what has to invest in a degree of rationality and empiricism to achieve science and technics. One must strike a balance – the mind must be scientific while the soul remains human.  But we cannot hide in the hobbit hole, while others reach the stars. The White Man cannot give up his Faustian birthright because of fearful, backwards-looking traditionalists. 

We must remember that science and technics are tools. And, we must also remember that we cannot derived values from tools. Our values must derive from our humanity, our reality as evolved organisms, and our sense of morals and ethics.  Science and technics must be used to achieve those values, but they are not the values themselves.

High Culture

One of the major components of the confederation-wide activity is constructing new cultural artifacts, particularly those of a pan-European civilizational High Culture nature. And, consistent with my Overman High Culture essay, one key component of this is to transition through the Spenglerian cycle, from the (probably, but not definitely) exhausted Western Faustian High Culture to a new High Culture, one suitable for the tasks at hand for European Man.

The rigid, dogmatic Spenglerians will screech and cry that the birth and direction of a High Culture is a purely innate, organic process that cannot be planned and directed by human effort. That will be doomed to failure, they aver, and they would gibber about pseudomporphosis and the like, claiming that any attempt to guide the creation of a High Culture would distort its expression.  Needless to say, I disagree with that view. 

It would seem that an examination of the beginnings of the West calls the rigid Spenglerian view into question. It was not inevitable that Christianity would come into being and, once it did, that it would eventually become the faith of the Roman Empire of Late Antiquity.  If that did not occur, then the history of the West would have been radically different. Even if the Western Roman Empire still fell, which likely it would have done eventually, and even if a new “Faustian” Western High Culture came into being, that new High Culture would have been significantly different had Christianity not been an integral part of it.  Indeed, was Christianity a Magian pseudomorphosis of the Western High Culture?  In any case, the fact that the West has been Christian was not an inevitable part of its organic growth, but a characteristic contingent upon certain specific historical events – accidents of history one might say – and decisions made by specific individuals, such as Roman emperors. So, if something as fundamental to the Western High Culture as European Christianity was a result of human decision and historical events, then why can’t the direction of a future European High Culture also be similarly modulated by human decision and historical events (events themselves of course affected by human decision)?  This is particularly so given that we today are conscious of the Spenglerian paradigm, a situation that obviously did not exist in the past.

I would like to believe that the sort of state that would come into being would manifest thus:

…Our European Mission is to create the Culture-State-Nation-Imperium of the West, and thereby we shall perform such deeds, accomplish such works, and so transform our world that our distant posterity, when they behold the remains of our buildings and ramparts, will tell their grandchildren that on the soil of Europe once dwelt a tribe of gods. - Francis Parker Yockey

Book Reviews: Griffin and Lowell

Books by Roger Griffin and Norman Lowell.

First:

Roger Griffin, Fascism: A Quick Immersion, Tibidabo Publishing, Inc., 2020

This book is an unoriginal rehash, a dumbed down version, of his previous “scholarly” work defining fascism and a fascist minimum, as well as of his work on the groupuscule concept; this new book is likely intended as sort of a handbook about fascism for hygiene-challenged Antifa and lard-enhanced blue-haired SJW fatties.

Griffin’s definition of fascism – centered on palingenetic ultra-nationalism – remains sound. Anyone who believes that Franco was a fascist or that Trump is a fascist is an idiot.  In this sense, Griffin remains correct.

However, the fact remains that the Left is congenitally unable to understand fascism and fascists and they ignore or misinterpret the lessons of Griffin’s work. Not for them are analyses of “palingenetic ultra-nationalism” or understanding of the revolutionary and dynamic nature of fascism. No, for them, fascism is simply reactionary oppression; thus, Franco was a fascist, Trump is a fascist, Wall Street stockbrokers are fascists – any White person to the right of Karl Marx is a fascist. They understand nothing, learn nothing, and their approach to the Far Right is simply bashing heads and censoring dissident voices.  Griffin’s beloved Left is intellectually and morally bankrupt, depends upon brute force, and has no use for his work.

Roger Griffin in this latest book expresses his usual tiresome shtick – he always dedicates his books to “the victims of fascism” and/or piously pontificates how the “real readers” of his books are so-called anti-fascists who can use his work to “diagnose and treat” the “disease” of fascism. His attitude toward fascism and fascists is one of snide contempt. However, in reality, the true readers of his works on fascism are fascists themselves - the proponents of the “Universal Nazism” that he decries as a major player in post-WWII fascist metapolitics - the Far Right being the only area of the political spectrum today where actual intellectual ferment occurs. Thanks, Griffin. Although no thanks are required for the volume under review here, as it breaks no new ground and is a rather pallid effort, with zero utility.

In this remarkably unoriginal book, Griffin once again repeats one of this constant tropes – fascists (i.e., the real Far Right) are impotent, desperate, powerless, and because of the “structural” nature of modern sociopolitical reality, fascists have absolutely zero chance of achieving any of their goals.  So, besides the obvious question as to why Griffin has dedicated his entire career to fixate on this useless, impotent, and powerless creed (*), we are left with another question – why is the Left/System always screeching about “the rise of fascism, the threat of fascism, the resurgence of fascism” if the Far Right is such a powerless joke with no chance whatsoever of achieving power?  Griffin argues – and I agree with him here since the facts are incontrovertible – that the whole leftist spectrum (from Marxist Antifa to Marxist university professors to the mass media to the political class to the typical blue-haired fatty) mistakes right-wing populism, paleoconservatism, identitarianism, and rightist reactionary authoritarianism as “fascism.” So, yes, if everyone to the right of John McCain and Mitt Romney is “fascist” then there is a resurgence of “fascism,” but that is just the stupidity and the paranoid fantasy of the Left. Those individuals and entities are not fascist, and so Griffin can continue to assert that not only is the Far Right completely powerless today (a fair assessment, but one lacking in context) but will always be so, regardless of context (not a fair assessment).

What Griffin terms the real existential threat – worse than Nazism and Stalinism – are ecocatastrophes and other such threats to human existence, which he claims will become more likely if the (non-fascist, but still bigoted and hateful) anti-liberal Right comes to power. All humanity will perish in a cataclysm because of, say, Trump or Le Pen or Bolsonaro or Brexit or Salvini.  Any deviation from SJW multiculturalism, any deviation from a pathological altruism that embraces every "other," any deviation from crazed xenophilia – that is going to threaten humanity.  All those intolerant White bigots will not and cannot effectively address the looming ecocatastrophe.

Thus, Griffin in this book has jumped the shark – or, more precisely, jumped the pachyderm – to write what may be the most juvenile and cringeworthy sentence in the history of childish leftist polemics:

Meanwhile, as Trumpism and the Brexit debate illustrate, the looming ecocatastrophe is still the elephant in the room, a metaphor that before long may have a tragic ring to it when the only elephants are left in zoos.

Jumbo weeps.

Well, after all, as we know, Negro transsexual lesbians and obese blue-haired neo-Marxist SJW feminists, who cry about microaggressions and about the patriarchy, and who “deconstruct” science and technics as the White Man’s ju-ju, are going to save us all from ecocatastrophe. Yes, the descendants of people who never invented the wheel are going to lead us to the stars, as long as we don’t reject “democratic pluralism” and as long as we blindly and self-destructively accept “otherness.”

Of course, the very opposite is the case. Griffin’s tolerant liberal democracy leads to a complete rejection of science; we’ve reached the point where university professors are disciplined for saying that men cannot become pregnant.  These are the people who are going to save us from an ecocatastrophe?  Is Black Lives Matter going to solve global warming?  Are critical theory advocates going to stop an asteroid strike? Is a ghetto gangbanger going to divert a comet? The only people who have demonstrated the scientific and technical capability to prevent an ecocatastrophe are those who Griffin’s work is intended to dispossess and, eventually, displace and replace. Griffin’s own ideology will help to bring about the ecological, physical, and cultural destruction he allegedly fears. It is multiculturalism, and the wages of diversity, that result in the hemorrhage of material resources, the loss of collective social goods, and the decline of community engagement (hello Putnam!  does Griffin “bowl alone?”) that will truly contribute to ecocatastrophe and human extinction.

I would like to end with two examples of why I hold Griffin in contempt. As part of his constant refrain of how modern fascists are a pathetic and powerless group with zero chance of achieving their goals, losers who cannot compete with the structural advantages of the victorious liberal democracy that the masses love and support, he demonstrates that he is either extremely stupid, so ideologically committed that he his blinded by a complete lack of self-awareness, or a mendacious and hypocritical gaslighting liar.

Griffin mocks Greece’s Golden Dawn as a “spent force” whose activists are on trial for being members of a “criminal organization.” That Griffin sees this as a victory for liberal democracy is simply astonishing.  WHY is Golden Dawn a “spent force?”  Was it defeated by liberal democracy in the marketplace of ideas?  No.  Golden Dawn was a potent force, increasing in popularity, and was attacked through political persecution by a liberal democratic state using “fascist” tactics of criminalizing political dissent. Thus, Golden Dawn is now a “criminal organization” – after all, it opposes liberal democracy and any dissent from liberal “tolerance” is unacceptable and must be criminalized – and its members are put “on trial” in a manner no different from the show trials of Stalinism. This, according to Griffin, is proof of the pathetic weakness of the Far Right - that it becomes so popular to the people, and so threatening to the liberal democratic state, that tolerant liberal democrats are forced to criminalize political dissent, jail political opponents, ban political parties, and censor political speech.  Griffin sees no problem with that.  He simply uses the criminalization of Golden Dawn as evidence of their ineptness without questioning whether criminalizing political dissent is compatible with the liberal democracy he so strongly espouses.

Then he mocks Britain First for having a large online presence but being unable to attract more than a handful of people to show up for a live rally, where they were out-numbered by antifascist protestors. Griffin neglects to note that the “anti-fascist protestors” are violent thugs who are protected by the State; in essence, Griffin's liberal democratic system uses criminal Antifa as stormtroopers to break up legal Far Right public events with brutal violence. The Antifa terrorists work hand-in-glove with the police and with the state security apparatus; if rightists defend themselves, it is they who are arrested and prosecuted.  No wonder that the Far Right doesn’t manifest many activists in street rallies these days.  In the context of the brutal repression by the liberal democratic state – and I haven’t even mentioned “hate speech” prosecutions and convictions in Britain that are used to suppress dissent (as they are throughout Europe) - any Far Right presence is impressive and should be applauded.

At no point whatsoever has Griffin’s liberal democracy engaged with the Far Right on a level playing field. At every point, liberal democracy uses authoritarian – and sometimes totalitarian – techniques of political violence, political repression and subversion, criminalization of speech and of dissent, to prop up their system.  Liberal democracy – and the Left in general – is intellectually, politically, and morally bankrupt. The fact that a so-called champion of liberal democracy such as Griffin blithely accepts political suppression of his opponents as “business as usual” demonstrates that the real “leakage” of “fascist ideas” into the mainstream has been the adoption of intolerant “fascist” techniques of political repression by the liberal democratic system.  Indeed, Griffin himself has been “tainted by fascism” since he accepts and applauds “fascist” techniques that are used to stifle ideas that displease him.

Further, even though the American “movement” is pitifully inept, “led” by affirmative action incompetents, it is still true that it has NOT been defeated in a free marketplace of ideas, but instead has been met with a combination of political persecution, street violence, selective prosecution, deplatforming, social pricing including termination of employment, and other assorted methods of authoritarian coercion that has nothing to do with classical liberalism or democratic procedures. The American Far Right has been suppressed by political thuggery and by criminal conspiracies to deprive activists of their basic constitutional civil rights.  This is essentially a tacit admission by Griffin’s vaunted liberal democracy that it had lost the battlefield of ideas. All that it has left is trying to win the battlefield of force and coercion.

This is true historically as well. Hitler was defeated by war; Mussolini was overthrown because of the war; Codreanu was murdered by the State. Fascism has never been defeated by liberal democracy in a free marketplace of ideas; it has only been defeated by brute force, by the “tolerant liberal state” using the tools of ruthless coercion, political persecution, and total war. Again, liberal democracy always adopts the tactics of “fascism” in order to defeat fascism; it is unable to do so on its own terms.

Griffin is a laughable turd indeed, the very incarnation of Nietzsche’s Last Man, the very embodiment of the sissified White Cuck.

What a buffoon.

*I suppose Griffin would argue that even though the Far Right is pathetic and powerless, certain of its illiberal and bigoted ideas can seep into the mainstream, through the filter of right-wing populism, and so must be studied and opposed for that reason; further, he asserts that pitiful and desperate fascists will conduct lone wolf terrorism and so are a limited threat in that sense. Even with all of that, the amount of his life energy put into the study and opposition to fascism is orders of magnitude out of proportion to the reality if he really believes the aforementioned are the only real long term threats to the liberal order from the Far Right.

Second:

Norman Lowell, Jesus the Usurper: Murderer of Christ, Norman Lowell, 2020.

This is the third in Lowell’s series of books, after Credo and Imperium Europa; this one stresses “spiritual” issues.

Now, at first glance I may be ill-suited to handle the task of reviewing such a work, since I am relatively uninterested in spiritual issues, focusing instead on the political and science/technics sides of racial and cultural issues. Needless to say, I am hostile to religion, organized or otherwise. However, these characteristics may in fact make me particularly well suited to tackle this task, for it may well be useful to have someone approach a spiritual work from an “outsider” position, purely objective without a “dog in the fight” so to speak.  In this sense I can examine Lowell’s arguments without being biased due to a pre-existing strong religious belief on the subject.  As a “third party observer” to spiritual and religious disputes, I can render a verdict based purely on the arguments made.  Of course, the book also needs to be critically examined by those who have more expertise (and “skin the in the game”) on this subject; nevertheless, my own viewpoint may be a useful supplement.

The foreword to this rather slender volume was written by an acquaintance of Lowell’s, a Kevin Ellul-Bonici, described as a “former police investigator and prosecutor specializing in fraud and economic crime," as well as someone involved in “Eurosceptic” politics. This individual claims to disagree with aspects of Lowell’s book and this is clear from the tenor of the foreword, particularly in its pro-Christian ending.  This individual, interestingly, claims that the Jews are not actually the prime movers in the conspiracy against the truth, which he instead avers are…the Jesuits.  Now, I do not wish to be close-minded, and I certainly am no expert on these affairs. I do not doubt the pernicious influence of the Jesuits throughout history, but I am – let us say – skeptical that they are the high point, the very top, of the global conspiracy. Indeed, I doubt that any single group is, but instead several powerful groups with interlocking interests – Jews, Jesuits, global capitalism, the Left, the rising tide of color, among others, are responsible.  Things get worse in the foreword with a dive into anti-materialism in the sense that the ultimate cause of our troubles is assigned to “extra-dimensional beings and the Luciferian agenda.” The author, unlike Lowell, takes a pro-Paul view in the midst of Christian apologia, and states that “The Man of Reason can never grasp how Christ redeemed us by paying the price on our behalf as descendants of the fallen Adam. Reason would rather have us believe the lies of this world then in His second coming.”

With all due respect, this is, in my opinion – as a “Man of Reason” – ridiculous nonsense, and completely against the message of Lowell’s book. On the one hand, one can admire Lowell’s open-mindedness and confidence in his own arguments as to invite a contradictory foreword; however, as a “Man of Reason” my overall reaction to the foreword was a loud sigh followed by a face-palm.  That is exactly the anti-reality, anti-the-real-world attitude, rejected by Lowell (and Nietzsche), which has contributed to our current demise. Oh, what damage two thousand years of Christian lies have wrought!  Crush the infamy!

Lowell himself in this book takes the view of Nietzsche that the traditional, "official" Jesus of Christianity was an invention by the Jew Paul to undermine the Roman Imperium, spreading a doctrine of weakness and surrender, making people disregard the heroic work required in the real world in favor of some (mythical) otherworldly paradise suited for the weak and the botched.  Lowell instead sees Christ as being Caesar, who was valued by Nietzsche as a form of superior human being.

This type of “Christianity,” focused on the higher values of Life, coupled to an Aryan Cosmotheism, is what Lowell sees as the spiritual way forward for European Man. A Nietzschean religion, allied with Cosmotheism, that elevates Caesar as an ubermensch to model ourselves after, is fine by me (although I would prefer no religion at all). But, surely, such a religion – Caesar as Christ – is far from any traditional understanding of Christianity and cannot be termed as such, nor would it be accepted by the public (or even by most elite activists) as such.  It is something completely different, and requires its own terminology.

All in all, Lowell’s contribution is interesting and thought-provoking. One thing though is that I’m not very fond of references to “Atlantis” and such.  A minor point. 

Overall, a good and useful book.

Norman Lowell Interview

Legion Europa.

I am reproducing below the interview I conducted with the great Norman Lowell back in 2002, as part of the Legion Europa project.

Interview with Norman Lowell

by

LEGION EUROPA

A UNIFYING IDEA

1 How and why did you get involved in the pro-Western movement?

When in my teens, I began to realize that something was wrong with the way world politics were evolving. It was obvious to me then, that both World Wars were fratricidal and of no benefit to the West. The betrayal of the Hungarian uprising was perplexing, Then came the "wind of change" and the undignified exit by Britain from the colonies, followed by the cold war, with one blunder after another, handing out territory and raw materials to communism, from Angola to Mozambique.

In the eighties I traveled extensively in Southern Africa, witnessing the crucifixion of Rhodesia first hand. While there, I came to realize the uselessness of conservatism: "we are fighting for our blacks" and all that. I remember that a conservative organization "The Save Rhodesia Campaign" had invited Gary Allen, a "right-winger" from the USA, to give a series of lectures in SA and Rhodesia, to which I attended. I noticed he reserved his most sarcastic retorts at question time for the most honest, patriotic Afrikaans who spoke openly about the need for the continuing separation of the races. An over-bloated gourmand, one evening after a typical gastronomical orgy of his, during which he kept wiping his soiled fingers on his shirt, Gary admitted to me he was Jewish! It suddenly dawned on me what we were up against.

At that time I sought and spoke with valid persons, one of whom was SED Brown, editor of the SA Observer, an erudite man who had been in the intelligence game for years with the British Army. He opened my eyes as to this world wide malady affecting the White Man, what it was all about: that Capitalism and Communism are two sides of the same coin, flipped regularly by the same international-mnipulators. From then on, I resolved to join the fight. From a bitter young man, groping, hitting out in all directions, I started formulating a plan of action and a philosophy for combating the Decline of the West.

2 What is the political and racial situation in Malta? Why establish a Pan-Aryan movement in that country?

Genetically, the Maltese are European, of the Alpine/Dinaric type. A perfectly assimilable minority within the great Europid race. In this context it is relevant to note the findings of Dr V Wyatt, an expert on poliomyelitis, as reported in The Times of Malta of the 23 July of 1982. Dr Wyatt found that although the climate in Malta was similar to that of the Middle East, the disease affected its Maltese victims in the same way as it affected Europeans and North Americans. It was quite different from the symptoms found in Middle Eastern and African patients.

Malta, in the Mediterranean, is a tiny island, but of great Spiritual significance for the Europid. Up to forty years ago, Malta had only one black. A bread, street-hawker called Pawlu it-Tork (Paul the Turk). So ignorant were the Maltese about blacks that they termed him a Turk! He was treated with civility by all - he was more of an oddity than a threat. That was all the non-Europid population in Malta. We were a homogeneous population, a materially poor but proud nation. We were strong in moral fibre and knew where we stood.

Gradually however, over the years the Christian clergy, the do-gooders, the "Third World Groups", started a steady, brainwashing campaign for the admittance of "refugees" into this overpopulated island. This brought the gradual infiltration by Arabs and blacks, masquerading as refugees. First they came in tens, in little boats. Then they started coming in their hundreds. They found hospitality from a naive people, misled by those two pernicious enemies within. A combination of rapacious capitalists seeking cheap labour and the eternal do-gooders, providing the capitalist with what he needed. An incongruent symbiosis between Christian clergy and Catholic capitalists.

The religious collectivists, those who have lost their bearings, their original message, have now become indistinguishable from the communists. In fear of the international-mnipulators, who lash them mercilessly through the controlled world press and TV, these clergy lay the groundwork, the psychological predisposition for our naive population to accept, to aid even, these hoards of alien invaders. The pernicious political-priests then channel these intruders to the employers, those callous capitalists who exploit them to the full. These catholic-capitalists in turn, assuage their conscience by donating massive amounts of cash, in charity, to the do-gooders, amply advertised on TV!

The so-called refugees, after undercutting the job-market and appropriating our jobs, to the utter carelessness of our politicians and glee of the capitalists, are now increasingly cohabiting with our women. TV brainwashing depicts blacks and minorities as role models, or heroes or else, poor displaced persons to be pitied. Our women eventually succumb to this incessant propaganda and are breeding an ever-increasing army of half-castes. If this goes on and unless drastic measures are taken to stop the rot now, within fifty years, Malta will become the Haiti of the Mediterranean. A microcosm of what is to befall White nations, all over the world.

Our traitor politicians meanwhile, on both sides of the house, unanimously signed a "Refugee Bill" giving the option to squat and remain for years, board and lodging free, to the decision and whims of the intruders! They only have to declare themselves as refugees and they become immune. They can't be booted out till after a long, arduous and costly exercise, taking months. We in Malta have lost our sovereignty, our defence of our nation's territory. What is now likely to happen is a Maltese-flag-junk-vessel carrying thousands of aliens, gate-crashing our shores, thereby setting an unprecedented collapse of security - much like Raspail's nightmarish prediction.

Like Britain, Malta steadfastly resisted invasion during World War II. Like Britain, it is being taken over, not by cousin race, as were the Germans and the Italians, but by hoards of TB, aids-infested blacks! What a sorry destiny for two brave islands: Great Britain and George Cross Malta.

Obviously, I just couldn't witness the betrayal of my country without doing anything about it. In January 2000, coinciding with the launching of my book Credo: A book for the very few, I formed my Movement: IMPERIUM EUROPA. I started speaking out, openly and without fear. Gradually, a small group of dedicated young men came forward and joined me. I organised them, imbued them with the fervour and idealism needed for this battle of ideas.

Our aim is that Malta, this Sacred Island of Melita, this land of honey, will be the first liberated nation in the whole, White World - liberated from the enemy within and the enemy without. Malta, at the southernmost tip of Europe, could ignite a flame that would set Europe ablaze. An IDEA, like a seed could spring to life anywhere. An IDEA whose time has come, is unstoppable!

This is my dream, my goal: that this IDEA of IMPERIUM EUROPA born in Malta, would capture the imagination of all Europids and bring that unity, which is imperative for the survival of this minority of biological aristocrats.

3 In general terms, what are the sorts of things you do in Malta? Have you been successful?

The newspapers here have been closed to us. One of two, leading English dailies has a catholic priest as editor! Now, one knows that the basis for an editor are facts, whilst that of a priest is faith. How the poor fellow manages to reconcile his conscience, when confronted daily with moral, ethical, social problems, I just cannot imagine.

So, as leader of our movement, I take every opportunity to be heard on radio and TV. For a long time our message was followed on national radio in a program The Voice of Freedom. I spoke most Fridays from 11pm till 6am the following morning. We had a huge audience, inundating us with valid questions, indicating that ordinary people, from all walks of life, are thirsting for knowledge. Once made aware of certain problems and dangers, people become alarmed and want to know more.

Now, even radio has been barred us. So I have decided to include Lowell Speaks in our website, were I will give weekly broadcasts on a broad range of subjects. Rather than commenting on current affairs, my talks will be based more on principles and ideology. For only a firm, ideological underpinning can nurture future leaders.

We have appeared on numerous TV programs that broke audience records. We confronted "the best" the establishment could pit against us. Obnoxious TV hosts, columnists and journalists, aided by the usual members of the tribe, tried their best to put us in bad light. Every time their efforts boomeranged, boosting our image, prestige and increasing our membership. Some Adherents are household names and if divulged, would make many gasp in disbelief.

We are not many, but the quality of those who join us is high and the enthusiasm, heartening. Modest in numbers, our influence is by far greater and we have succeeded in shifting the ideological confrontation to the Right. Ideas that would have been taboo just five years ago are now openly discussed and debated. Most important, despite the censorship, when we speak, people listen.

4 What is the underlying philosophy behind IMPERIUM EUROPA? Behind your book Credo What is it that you wish to accomplish?

My political philosophy is expounded in my book Credo: A book for the very few which can be downloaded through secure server from our IMPERIUM EUROPA website. Basically, I had started from a firm believe in unfettered capitalism, till I realized that this would mean the disappearance of the Europid race. It is all right preaching capitalism, which inherently denies race and racial differences, to a racially conscious minority, with a burning sense of mission for world power. A group that for two thousand years has steadfastly refused to assimilate within the host nations - while at the same time influencing and distorting the host culture. This group can use capitalism, thrive through it, corner the market, primarily because they act as a cohesive, racial group, a tribe. It is this, that gives this racial-minority such awesome power, out of all proportion to their numbers, within a free-market economy.

So, I had to find a way so that the creative genius of the White Man, the innovator, the producer is never stifled - and yet this individual, though free and unshackled, still feels part of the volk. More, this preserved sense of nationhood is sublimated into a greater sense of nationalism, a supra-nationalism: that of IMPERIUM EUROPA.

The IDEA of IMPERIUM EUROPA is gaining increasing attention at the highest cultural and political levels. Geo-political think tanks are giving it increasing importance. Gradually this IDEA will permeate downwards and, in a couple of years, reach the market place in Brussels!

The Imperium will mean that Western Civilization will become organically whole: Spiritually, Racially, Culturally, Politically and lastly, Economically. The nonsensical and ultimately suicidal policy of "export or die" - where the Europid gives away his every innovation, which is then used against him - will be relegated to the dustbin of history, where it rightfully belongs.

An IMPERIUM EUROPA would mean a vast market of one billion Europids, the most intelligent humans on the planet. It would enable them to survive, surrounded by the burgeoning billions of the Third World. Europids are the only ones capable of producing a food surplus. Thus, we will only have to barter food for whatever we need from outside the Imperium.

And this, is precisely what I wish to accomplish. My vision is that of an Imperium, on a planetary basis, uniting all Europids, wherever they may be. An Imperium led by The Elite. An Elite beyond parliaments, parties, politicians, prostitutes and pernicious, political priests. A new Aristocracy of the Spirit - an Aristocracy based on meritocracy. An Elite of a quarter of a million, spread over the Imperium, High Culture Bearers: An Order of Men as were the Templars and Teutonic Knights. They would be the guardians of the Imperium. Their sole concern would be Spirituality, Race and High Politics. This Elite will forge a new Science of the Spirit.

A top priority will be an Ordensburg, a center of studies for The Elite. A vessel, adequate to sustain the Spiritual capacity, the impulse necessary for the radical reformation of present society. Sited hundreds of miles from anywhere, preferably at Omsk, at the center of the Eurasian landmass, or "World-Island", this Spiritual-intellectual university is of the utmost importance. For world history is nothing else but the struggle for power of competing Elite, with their concern with the secrets of nature, as they seek to positively impact and alter the entire culture, structure and direction of society. Always ahead, in anticipation of the next advancement necessary, in the evolution of the race the Elite, with its aura of prestige and pride infuses, implants that Spiritual impulse into the masses. These, in complete freedom of choice, may continue to live their ordinary lives, so long as the imperative of Race is safeguarded.

A continuous planting of the best seed for the future of the race, the Elite improves itself over time. As with the apex of a pyramid, just a slight turn, a shift in emphasis by the Elite as it evolves, greatly affects the whole base, the people. Principled stimuli often have far reaching results. Hence the importance for the highest standards, molding these veritable SuperMan on earth: living Zarathustras.

Life at the Elite Ordensburg will have definite organizational characteristics: a principle-centered existence that is applied to day to day affairs. An increasingly esoteric, hierarchical Elite seeking that mystical knowledge of the Race, wherever it may be found: The Egyptian Temple system, The Essenes, Cathars, The Grail quest, The Templars. A synthesis linking the White Man to his mythical, pre-Christian, unadulterated past and propelling him to his future. A galactical quest in the fulfillment of his destiny.

For our next step, our next adventure, will be the terra forming of Mars and the other planets, within the solar system. The Europid will colonize these planets for himself. Then onwards, towards the furthest reaches of the universe, till we come face to face with Godhood - and finally, fully realize ourselves!

5 Why do you think the "Right" has heretofore been kept out of power? Why the lack of success?

During the immediate post-war years the Right in general was associated with Nazism and Fascism and therefore, had a bad image. One remembers the valiant efforts of Sir Oswald Mosely to start Union Movement, in the immediate post-war years, and the virulence of the opposition he encountered. Even when it managed to win a few seats, up to very recently the Right was kept out in the cold in the democratic, musical chairs and partitioning of ministerial posts and perks. Later, with the initial victories of the Right in various European countries, it was internal division that became the primary cause of failure to capitalize on this success.

Nothing saddens me so much as the divisiveness of the Right. Our enemies, the international-manipulators, use this weapon in order to keep us divided and ineffectual. I have seen it happen many times during the past twenty years. In Britain, with the National Front and later, the BNP, throwing away their initial successes out of the window with their internal, interminable squabbles. Often, of a purely personal nature, the clash of personalities.

Even in France, with Le Pen treated as a pariah for years, the Front National could afford the luxury of a split. And the same in Italy, with the MSI and AN going their respective ways.

In the USA, with a myriad of Right wing parties and groups vying for attention. The mutual damage of a Duke and Buchanan candidacy.

Now at last, the Italian Left has finally been defeated by a Right Wing coalition including Alleanza Nazionale, a party of strong views and a fairly complete ideological underpinning. This victory was possible because, for once it was the Left that was divided and afforded the chance. Of course, if Berlusconi had to disappear from the political scene his party, a Liberal party with no political grassroots, would disintegrate, its voters flocking to AN, giving this Right-wing party an outright majority.

The same has happened in France. The Left fielded ten candidates, hacking at each other; and Le Pen emerged victorious. The lesson is clear: together we stand, divided we freeze! So really, the Right has only itself to blame, if it has been so ineffectual throughout all these years. We did it all on our own!

6 To what do you attribute the recent success of the "Right" in Europe? Will it last? More importantly, will these folks get anything done, or is this more of the game of electoral politics?

With the fall of the Berlin Wall, communism and with it Euro communism and the Left in general, became ideologically bankrupt. There is very little ideology left in the Left. I mean, ten percent of French voters cast their votes for a Trotkyite! What is left is a wishy-washy socialism that has adopted nineteenth century, Liberal economic and fiscal policies.

This political vacuum has undoubtedly been a boon to the Right. Right wing parties are gaining parliamentary seats and credible majorities all over Europe. But even at such an early stage, the signs are ominous. Poles are reclaiming land from the Ukraine. Germans want Danzig and the Czech Sudetenlands, threatening a veto against the Czech Republic's application for European membership. The Italians demand Istra. Hungarians claim land from the Romanians, while the Bulgarians want their piece from the other two. We have seen it all before!

Moreover, a more insidious political danger is that the Right in power, by itself or in coalition, runs the risk of eventually loosing its identity, its soul. This is inevitable in a prolonged democratic power-game, where compromise is the art of the game. For it is the system that is inherently faulty: Democracy, the counting of heads, like sheep and lowering of standards to the least, common denominator. It is the system that the Right has to destroy and replace, once in power, making way for a real democracy amongst peers: the Elite.

For in our future world the masses will be kept out of politics. They don't belong there. Politics will be the realm of High Culture Bearers, not millions of minions casting their useless votes every five years.

The fight is on two levels: ballot and bullet. Parliamentary pow-wow and an extra-parliamentary, revolutionary onslaught on all fronts: A total cultural war, waged by the Activist, every Free Spirit, every Thought-Action Man, on the present decrepit system. War in the arts, music, theatre, universities; war against hypocrisy and democracy, a fragile form of government founded on mediocrity, equality and fear. A total war to topple that tottering totem. And always: Memento Audere Semper.

The Revolutionary Right has to infiltrate, enfeeble, disorientate the main-stream parties. The more the confusion, the exasperation of the common people, the better! Meanwhile, Right Wing parties in parliament can promise the security the electorate clamors for. A two pronged attack on a degenerate, democratic system that has had its innings - and which are rapidly coming to an end.

7 Can we win? How?

We are winning! Despite our weaknesses and divisions, the Right is taking over the world of Ideas. We have managed to appropriate the ideological high ground. We are making good use of the Internet - certainly much more so than the Left. The Right is spreading its message effectively and eloquently, with a language that is at once sharp, but not cutting. We are becoming masters at convincing the undecided.

Our enemies sense our success and see all this. That is why they are screaming for the censorship, curbing of the web - with themselves as censors, naturally! This must never be allowed to happen.

We of the international, Radical-Racialist-Right-Revolutionary-Reactionaries: Pan Aryanists, whose common aim is the survival of Western Man, must band together. All Leaders of the various Movements, should join in an umbrella organization on the Internet, protected by an encryption system, which no government agency can break. We can then start planning, planetary power.

A hermetic Imperium within the net, enabling a dynamic, dialectical debate amongst the various factions, no matter how disparate. Let us call them Legions. The initial resolve to join must be sincere, with no personality clashes, or negative attitudes, allowed to spoil such an important undertaking. Only the Leaders, those who have proved themselves, the precursors of the Elite of the future, will be represented. This will ensure less contribution to confusion, and more conclusion.

As often happens when rivals or contestants meet and talk to each other, a mutual respect for the qualities of one another, gradually matures. This will lead to a convergence of parallel aims, thus strengthening the synthesis. A hermetic Imperium of IDEAS before the actual installation of the coming, inevitable, unstoppable: IMPERIUM EUROPA.

Legion Europa could be this vehicle for such a plan of action. Within this vehicle, this form, let the debate rage on. Within the vessel of Legion Europa all IDEAS will be discussed, analyzed till a Pan-Aryan, political philosophy, A UNIFYING IDEA is adopted - One that can assure us world victory. Our target date to be 2012: Anno Zero!

The importance of this meeting of minds of Leaders cannot be overstressed. Permit me to refer you to your question No 4 and to which, en passant I had answered: "As with the apex of a pyramid, just a slight turn, a shift in emphasis from the elite as it evolves, greatly affects the whole base, the people. Principled stimuli often have far reaching results."

8 Explain this Unifying IDEA

The beauty of the Right is that, of its very nature, it is so varied, so vibrant, vigorous. This is strong propulsion for translated action. Problem is, most of the time, all this energy is scattered, unfocussed, at times turned inwards.

Only A UNIFYING IDEA can remedy this waste. An IDEA to fill that vessel, Legion Europa, I spoke about earlier. An IDEA strong enough, a magnet so powerful as to draw together, to a convergence, all the forces of the Right. At the same time each group, sub-race, retaining its identity: ethnic and cultural.

In my view, such an IDEA can surely be an IMPERIUM EUROPA. An Imperium on a planetery basis, uniting all Europids, everywhere. An Imperium not of bankers and bureaucrats, but of High Planetary Politics and Peoples, with a central authority, embodying both the Political and the Spiritual. A center, to which all Europids will refer and relate. A hub, whereby all parts of the Empire would feel organically whole, while retaining the specific peculiarity of each region. Retaining initiative, diversity, interaction, castes, classes, character, personality, hierarchy; all converging to a superior IDEA.

An Imperium for Europids only - and none else! An Empire with ever expanding borders, within which the travesty of democracy will have no place. For an Imperium is by its very nature, expanding or dying. It is fuelled by an ambition for power, through an iron will of The Elite. A power over oneself and adversaries and adversities.

As I said earlier, our unbeatable weapon will be food. The White Man's ability to grow a food surplus. We will use food as a political weapon, in order to further our Imperial aims. We will barter food for all that we need from outside the Imperium - nothing else!

Our lingua-franca will be Latin, the language of ancient Rome and the root language of most European peoples. Any Europid within the Imperium would be able to communicate with another, in Latin, wherever they may meet.

The Imperium is male, dominant and sets itself no limits. It grasps every opportunity for expansion, penetration and domination. As a practical example, the present state of the economy of Argentina would be an ideal pretext for IMPERIUM EUROPA to extend into South America. We would take Argentina, a White country, within our fold.

An Imperium of Regions as against the artificial nation-states - uniting the four Europid cousins: the Anglo-Saxons, the Teutons, Slavs and Latins.

Two White rings will encircle the globe, North and South of the Equator. To the North, the Imperium will stretch from Ireland to Vladivostock. Across the Bering Strait it will join a Nova America, or Vinland, comprising Alaska, Canada and a re-dimensioned White USA.

In the South, the White Man will be the undisputed lord over White Africa, South of the Congo River and the Great Lakes. Through the promise of food, we will force the ungrateful Negrid northwards, leaving him to the tender mercies of the Arabs. Australia and New Zealand will become a White continent reserved solely for the Europid. A short, sharp repatriation programme would send all the Asians back to their continent. The sub-Amazonian White-cone, as well as the Panama Isthmus and its adjacent territories, will be the White Man's sole preserve.

9 What do you think of the conflict between the Pan-European/Pan-Aryan faction and the Nordicist/Nordishist faction? What is going on here?

Tragic, truly tragic. The urgent need for the White Man today, be he Swede, German, Russian, Spaniard, Greek or Italian is to band together - or else risk disappearing off the history books. We are too few, too scattered, to permit ourselves the luxury of divisiveness, ethnic exclusivity, ethnocentricity by a minority of a minority, inter-Aryan rivalry or worse; feuds and fratricides.

The four European cousins: the Anglo Saxons, Teutons, Slavs and Latins can together form the mightiest Imperium ever seen on earth, and which would ensure the survival of the Europid. Once the Imperium is in place, then we may proceed with a eugenics programme, a judicious mixture amongst the cousin Europid, sub-races. This can only fortify the Europid race as a whole.

One should remember that, just a few centuries ago, the Ottomans reached the gates of Vienna. That the Arabs overran Spain and large tracts of France and that, without the brave stand of Southern Europeans, who bore and took the brunt of the fighting, Arabs would have turbanized Father Xmas, up in Norway.

Even The Hero, in his Reichstag speech of Dec 11th, 1941 acknowledges this repeatedly:

"And when the Roman legions defended Italy in three terrible wars against the attack of Carthage from Africa, and finally battled to victory, in this case as well, Rome fought not just for herself, but also for the Greco-Roman world which then encompassed Europe.

"Whether it was the German emperors fighting back invasions from the East by the Unstrut or on the Lechfeld, near Augsburg, in 955, or others pushing back Africa from Spain over a period of many years, it was always a struggle of a developing Europe against a profoundly alien outside world.

"And when Spanish heroes stood against Africa, they defended not just Spain, but all of Europe as well.

"If the Slovaks, Hungarians and Romanians had not also acted to defend this European world"

"If Italy, Spain and Croatia had not sent their divisions"..

and on and on.

Should Nordicists ever make the mistake of separating themselves from the rest of the White World, it would be only a matter of time when we would all be submerged and perish, piecemeal.

10 How would you reply to those Nordicentric activists who claim that an IMPERIUM EUROPA would result in a general panmixia of European groups and, hence, destruction of "Nordish" phenotypes? How would you reply to those who say that this would be a "Fabian conquest" (their words) of Nordish Europeans by non-"Nordish" Europeans?

I am not suggesting anything of the sort! Everyone, within IMPERIUM EUROPA would be free to choose his place of abode, his region, his job, his partner, his way of life. Capitalism within a Racial Context in an IMPERIUM EUROPA. This is the crux of it all. It would ensure the survival of all the branches of the European family. The Anglo-Saxons, the Teutons, Slavs and Latins would all remain what they are - it is their choice. Nobody is ramming anything down anyone's throat.

The formidable strength of a worldwide IMPERIUM EUROPA would guarantee the defense of the Mediterranean Northern Littorial and hence, the Nordics from the burgeoning billions of assertive Muslims. It would be a defense of Nordics and Slavs from the Mongolian billions of the Far East. Australia, with its low White population, huge expanse of empty territory and thousands of miles of undefended coastline, would surely need the protection of such a union of European peoples. Likewise, All-White-South-Africa would be shielded from the covetous eyes of India, whose objective since World War Two, has been that to replace the Negrid in Africa by its own, surplus population.

Why should Nordics be so apprehensive? Why should they be so myopic? Why should Nordics fear assimilation by Southern Europeans? Mediterraneanids and Nordics are genetically closely related. They are completely compatible genetically, as offspring from the two sub-races clearly reveal. The Race of the "Battle Axe People" have left incontrovertible proof at Val Camonica, Italy, that they were Indo Aryans, with genetic affinity to the Nordic-Atlantic, Franco Cantabrian Cro-Magnon, as well as with the Scandinavian Fossum civilisation.

And what Mediterraneanid wants to live in Norway or Sweden for that matter? It is the Skandinavids, who are moving south and living in European Mediterranean lands. Here in Malta, we have had numerous cases of young Nordics in their teens and early twenties, on holiday, barricading themselves in hotel rooms or guest-homes, refusing to go back home! We have had the police actually intervening and hauling these youngsters, boo-hooing onto their planes! Come on let us be realist!

11 What advice would you give activists throughout the White world?

We are getting stronger, bolder. Our enemies will again try to divide and throw us in disarray. Now at this crucial stage, is the time for a clear vision and firm action. We all must do our bit, however small and humble it may be. Every positive action by each Activist leads us a little nearer to final victory.

The Internet could bring undreamed of options for the Activist in the way of learning, diffusion of ideas, participating, communicating with those still unaware of the life or death struggle, going on between us and our mortal enemies. The outcome of this struggle is our survival as sub-species till the end of the 21st century. All this now depends, not on others but on ourselves: each and every one of us. The future we dream of, wish to create, is in our hands - our own individual responsibility. Only our actions will ultimately decide the issue - and be our legacy to future generations.

12 Any parting comments?

Yes: - Magna Europa est Patria Nostra!

Norman Lowell

IMPERIUM EUROPA

2002

Odds and Ends, 6/21/20

In der news. In all cases, emphasis added.

Another example of how ethnonationalists ruin everything they touch:

1999, a manifesto of a second 'European Liberation Front' was published in Paris, but there is apparently no more active organisation of that name now. The manifesto takes its ideological inspiration from Yockey, and from Otto Strasser, who was expelled from the Nazi Party by Adolf Hitler in 1930.

Despite the pan-European style of its title, the ideology of the manifesto is ethnic and racial nationalism…

Take over the name of Yockey’s organization and then promote an opposing ideology.  Very good!  Hail Der Movement!

Authentic pan-Europeanism does not exist in any organization of which I am aware over the last 50 years or more, except Lowell's in Malta.

Forney on Spencer Part I.  Part II.

Note that I do not agree on Forney on all his comments, but, nevertheless, the rank-and-file needs to understand where their affirmative action program leads.  I also find Forney’s glee at Spencer’s problems unseemly.  It is not funny, it is a tragedy.  I don’t care about Spencer himself, but we all need to realize that the White public – you know, the folks that your “movement” wants to recruit from – do not make fine distinctions between Spencer, Johnson, Forney, Taylor et al.  It’s all one.  Spencer’s downfall therefore reflects badly on the entirety of racial activism in the public "mind."  

That downfall, ultimately, derives from the lack of judgment of “movement” “elites.”  Spencer should never have been allowed to be the head of NPI in the first place; that position should have gone to an older individual with more experience, maturity, and gravitas. Spencer should instead have been groomed for electoral politics, as the smiling young face of the Far Right, with mature adults as his behind-the-scenes handlers. 

The past cannot be changed. But going forward, the affirmative program needs to be eliminated.  That is step one.  It’s not a case of a single rotten apple that needs to be gotten rid of, it’s a whole case.  And as soon as one apple becomes so horribly decayed that it is thrown out, another one joins in. The entire crate needs to be thrown out, and the entire process of picking rotten apples changed.

A sincere man of genuine greatness.

Glad to see we got dem dere Republican conservative judges like “Earl Warren Jr.” Roberts there.

I’m no fan of Rushton, but the retraction of his hypothesis paper was unfair and disgusting, and I agree with this analysis, which is a refutation of leftist hysteria that helped get the paper unfairly retracted.  I also agree with the analysis in that the author of the leftist attack on Rushton-Templar doesn't understand what pleiotropy is, possibly confusing it with epistasis (or who knows what).  I am also amused by the leftist critique of Rushton-Templar for having a "political bias." Hoho!  What about the leftist critic's bias?  Would he care to inform us on his views on say, race in America?  What's his party affiliation?  Who did he vote for in 2016? What about, say, Lewontin's biases?  Any comments on that?

If the Rushton-Templar paper was inherently flawed – even as a hypothesis – and this somehow escaped the notice of the reviewers at that time, then the appropriate response is to write a paper (for publication) refuting the Rushton-Templar logic and/or do studies that produce data refuting the Rushton-Templar hypothesis. Retracting the paper is politically motivated censorship, leading us to a scientific dark ages. The retraction is a disgrace.

Hey, it’s time for Trump to tweet LAW AND ORDER!  That’ll fix it.  Fat Don is like, you know, demonstrating his sincerity and his genuine greatness!

I was looking at Amazon reviews of Robert Griffin’s One Sheaf One Vine book, of interest to me since I am one of the people featured in it.  Two excerpts from the comments I found amusing:

1. Interesting anthropological study. Nothing really new here, but contains only interview available of Alex Linder. No other interviews with people who would go on to become personages. 

That’s a stinging rebuke of my lack of accomplishment I suppose.

2. Another observation I make, is that none of the people in the book, offer any solutions to the racial problems they criticize. In numerous cases, they simply flee those high-'diversity' problems by moving to other, whiter states. But none of them seem to envision the new domiciles undergoing future change.

Let’s see.  I spend a significant portion of my interview talking about practical things that should be done.  So it would seem that this individual lacks any reading comprehension skills whatsoever.  As well, with respect to the second half of the criticism, I’m not one of the “numerous cases” since that’s nowhere in my section.

Also interesting is that if you search on Amazon for a book like this, you get “suggested reading” consisting of a host of anti-White diatribes.  Like Google, Amazon is another company I am going to personally “deplatform” from any spending.

Thus in summary: Sallis right, Johnson wrong.

Kevin Strom:

The purpose of the race that is is to bring into being the race that is to come. Let’s concentrate on that. Let’s concentrate on being the ones who decide that.

I have been in this cause of ours for nearly 40 years. I have seen and heard and read so much wasted verbiage about why Russians or eastern Europeans generally, or southern Europeans generally, or even other odd subracial or national combinations should be read out of the White race. I have heard it all, please don’t repeat it to me. I’m sick of it.

The group or groups which coalesce to save our endangered race will be the ones who determine its genetic future. Beyond the obvious aesthetic that we know White when we see it, and a future that can include (but not be totally ruled by) accurate genetic testing, that’s all we need to know. If the White future is primarily Russian or Hungarian, so be it. If the White future is primarily pan-European American with strong German, Anglo, and Irish components, so be it. If the White future is predominantly Greek or Italian or Bulgarian or Nordic, so be it. None of us are in a position to pick and choose right now, nor does such picking and choosing make sense during this crisis.

Let’s just admit that every single group and sub-group of Europeans has racially devolved — due to dysgenics, due to genetic drift, due to past mixtures. Let’s just admit that every single White nationality could be — and, if we have anything to say about it, will be — helped by a healthy dose of eugenics.

But never forget this: We are targeted and marked for death as Whites. It is as Whites — not as dolichocephalic Red Nordids, or Paleo-Atlantids, or western Europeans only — that we must become awakened and fight back.

Very good; I obviously agree.  But then Strom has to admit that much of the work of Pierce and of the National Alliance was and is de facto opposed to that pan-European view. As regards Pierce accepting people with fractional Amerindian ancestry (and Pierce’s gibbering about “Caucasian” Amerindian tribes is nonsense - whatever their appearance, they are racial aliens from Asia), we must remember that the “Indian princess” stories – real or imagined – typically derive from “Nordish” Anglo-Americans. They’ve always gotten a “pass” for that – the “Pace Amendment” for example.

By the way, even Yockey himself wasn’t immune to a touch of Nordicism, with respect to his rhapsodizing about “Northern barbarians” in both Imperium and, more especially, Thoughts Personal and Superpersonal. I suppose we can forgive Yockey for that lapse, since the broader “movement” he derives from has always been marinated in Nordicism, but it is rather hypocritical of him given his pontifications about horizontal vs. vertical race.  And what would he think today, with all of the “Northern Barbarians” being the biggest race cucks of them all?

And by the way, Yockeyites past and present should know that The Doctrine of Fascism they so admire was really written by Giovanni Gentile, not Benito Mussolini.  But Gentile was one of those two foot tall superstitious Sicilians who so vexed Humphrey Ireland, so who cares about facts?

Newly discovered!  A film clip of Humphrey Ireland being overwhelmed by the scurrying Sicilian hordes.