Odds and Ends, 6/21/20

In der news. In all cases, emphasis added.

Another example of how ethnonationalists ruin everything they touch:

1999, a manifesto of a second 'European Liberation Front' was published in Paris, but there is apparently no more active organisation of that name now. The manifesto takes its ideological inspiration from Yockey, and from Otto Strasser, who was expelled from the Nazi Party by Adolf Hitler in 1930.

Despite the pan-European style of its title, the ideology of the manifesto is ethnic and racial nationalism…

Take over the name of Yockey’s organization and then promote an opposing ideology.  Very good!  Hail Der Movement!

Authentic pan-Europeanism does not exist in any organization of which I am aware over the last 50 years or more, except Lowell's in Malta.

Forney on Spencer Part I.  Part II.

Note that I do not agree on Forney on all his comments, but, nevertheless, the rank-and-file needs to understand where their affirmative action program leads.  I also find Forney’s glee at Spencer’s problems unseemly.  It is not funny, it is a tragedy.  I don’t care about Spencer himself, but we all need to realize that the White public – you know, the folks that your “movement” wants to recruit from – do not make fine distinctions between Spencer, Johnson, Forney, Taylor et al.  It’s all one.  Spencer’s downfall therefore reflects badly on the entirety of racial activism in the public "mind."  

That downfall, ultimately, derives from the lack of judgment of “movement” “elites.”  Spencer should never have been allowed to be the head of NPI in the first place; that position should have gone to an older individual with more experience, maturity, and gravitas. Spencer should instead have been groomed for electoral politics, as the smiling young face of the Far Right, with mature adults as his behind-the-scenes handlers. 

The past cannot be changed. But going forward, the affirmative program needs to be eliminated.  That is step one.  It’s not a case of a single rotten apple that needs to be gotten rid of, it’s a whole case.  And as soon as one apple becomes so horribly decayed that it is thrown out, another one joins in. The entire crate needs to be thrown out, and the entire process of picking rotten apples changed.

A sincere man of genuine greatness.

Glad to see we got dem dere Republican conservative judges like “Earl Warren Jr.” Roberts there.

I’m no fan of Rushton, but the retraction of his hypothesis paper was unfair and disgusting, and I agree with this analysis, which is a refutation of leftist hysteria that helped get the paper unfairly retracted.  I also agree with the analysis in that the author of the leftist attack on Rushton-Templar doesn't understand what pleiotropy is, possibly confusing it with epistasis (or who knows what).  I am also amused by the leftist critique of Rushton-Templar for having a "political bias." Hoho!  What about the leftist critic's bias?  Would he care to inform us on his views on say, race in America?  What's his party affiliation?  Who did he vote for in 2016? What about, say, Lewontin's biases?  Any comments on that?

If the Rushton-Templar paper was inherently flawed – even as a hypothesis – and this somehow escaped the notice of the reviewers at that time, then the appropriate response is to write a paper (for publication) refuting the Rushton-Templar logic and/or do studies that produce data refuting the Rushton-Templar hypothesis. Retracting the paper is politically motivated censorship, leading us to a scientific dark ages. The retraction is a disgrace.

Hey, it’s time for Trump to tweet LAW AND ORDER!  That’ll fix it.  Fat Don is like, you know, demonstrating his sincerity and his genuine greatness!

I was looking at Amazon reviews of Robert Griffin’s One Sheaf One Vine book, of interest to me since I am one of the people featured in it.  Two excerpts from the comments I found amusing:

1. Interesting anthropological study. Nothing really new here, but contains only interview available of Alex Linder. No other interviews with people who would go on to become personages. 

That’s a stinging rebuke of my lack of accomplishment I suppose.

2. Another observation I make, is that none of the people in the book, offer any solutions to the racial problems they criticize. In numerous cases, they simply flee those high-'diversity' problems by moving to other, whiter states. But none of them seem to envision the new domiciles undergoing future change.

Let’s see.  I spend a significant portion of my interview talking about practical things that should be done.  So it would seem that this individual lacks any reading comprehension skills whatsoever.  As well, with respect to the second half of the criticism, I’m not one of the “numerous cases” since that’s nowhere in my section.

Also interesting is that if you search on Amazon for a book like this, you get “suggested reading” consisting of a host of anti-White diatribes.  Like Google, Amazon is another company I am going to personally “deplatform” from any spending.

Thus in summary: Sallis right, Johnson wrong.

Kevin Strom:

The purpose of the race that is is to bring into being the race that is to come. Let’s concentrate on that. Let’s concentrate on being the ones who decide that.

I have been in this cause of ours for nearly 40 years. I have seen and heard and read so much wasted verbiage about why Russians or eastern Europeans generally, or southern Europeans generally, or even other odd subracial or national combinations should be read out of the White race. I have heard it all, please don’t repeat it to me. I’m sick of it.

The group or groups which coalesce to save our endangered race will be the ones who determine its genetic future. Beyond the obvious aesthetic that we know White when we see it, and a future that can include (but not be totally ruled by) accurate genetic testing, that’s all we need to know. If the White future is primarily Russian or Hungarian, so be it. If the White future is primarily pan-European American with strong German, Anglo, and Irish components, so be it. If the White future is predominantly Greek or Italian or Bulgarian or Nordic, so be it. None of us are in a position to pick and choose right now, nor does such picking and choosing make sense during this crisis.

Let’s just admit that every single group and sub-group of Europeans has racially devolved — due to dysgenics, due to genetic drift, due to past mixtures. Let’s just admit that every single White nationality could be — and, if we have anything to say about it, will be — helped by a healthy dose of eugenics.

But never forget this: We are targeted and marked for death as Whites. It is as Whites — not as dolichocephalic Red Nordids, or Paleo-Atlantids, or western Europeans only — that we must become awakened and fight back.

Very good; I obviously agree.  But then Strom has to admit that much of the work of Pierce and of the National Alliance was and is de facto opposed to that pan-European view. As regards Pierce accepting people with fractional Amerindian ancestry (and Pierce’s gibbering about “Caucasian” Amerindian tribes is nonsense - whatever their appearance, they are racial aliens from Asia), we must remember that the “Indian princess” stories – real or imagined – typically derive from “Nordish” Anglo-Americans. They’ve always gotten a “pass” for that – the “Pace Amendment” for example.

By the way, even Yockey himself wasn’t immune to a touch of Nordicism, with respect to his rhapsodizing about “Northern barbarians” in both Imperium and, more especially, Thoughts Personal and Superpersonal. I suppose we can forgive Yockey for that lapse, since the broader “movement” he derives from has always been marinated in Nordicism, but it is rather hypocritical of him given his pontifications about horizontal vs. vertical race.  And what would he think today, with all of the “Northern Barbarians” being the biggest race cucks of them all?

And by the way, Yockeyites past and present should know that The Doctrine of Fascism they so admire was really written by Giovanni Gentile, not Benito Mussolini.  But Gentile was one of those two foot tall superstitious Sicilians who so vexed Humphrey Ireland, so who cares about facts?

Newly discovered!  A film clip of Humphrey Ireland being overwhelmed by the scurrying Sicilian hordes.

Political PopGen

And other news.

More mendacity.  I like how they are trying to surprise us with “you see, the Ancient World was really diverse” (shilling for modern mass alien immigration), while the fact that Rome itself (the city and immediately surrounding regions, specifically) became a cosmopolitan city has always been well known. In fact, if I recall correctly, some of the early work from the Cavalli-Sforza lab identified Rome and Naples (and areas immediately surrounding) as being somewhat genetically different from the rest of Italy, with the suggestion that it was because of the cosmopolitan aspects of these large cities throughout history. What about Alexandria?  It has always been known that it had a variety of ethnic groups.  What about the metics of Athens? Again, it was ALWAYS known that these large cities of ancient big states/empires, civilizational units, etc. were not purely homogeneous.  Why lie?  Why set up a strawman so you can knock it down with breathless accounts of the "surprising diversity?"  If for what other reason than to convince Whites to open their borders to the other today, and to cheerfully accept their demographic displacement and replacement?

Again, it depends what you mean by “Rome.”  If by that you mean the city itself, I don’t know of anyone who ever claimed the city did not attract migrants and take slaves. However, if by “Rome” you mean the entire Empire, including the mass of the area of current-day Italy, that’s a different story. Migrants (non-European) were not settling, in any substantial number,  in “backwaters.” There were slaves working farms, but those were hardly settled people who were reproducing (and were unlikely to have been spindly, flabby easterners in any case).

The city of Rome – no surprise. The entirety of "Rome" is not, obviously, going to reflect the same “diversity.”  By the way, population changes in Rome thousands of years ago do not obligate Italy – or any other nation – to accept immigrants today.  And, also, Ancient Rome itself was under no obligation to accept newcomers from its empire. They stupidly had slaves, yes, but as regards voluntary migrants – why accept them?  Just because you rule over various peoples does not obligate you to accept them as migrants. Even when universal citizenship was granted, it could have been enjoyed in place. There was no need or obligation to accept any influx into the city of Rome itself.

This is amusing though:

Then, starting about 1,700 years ago, the empire entered a phase of gradual dissolution. The Roman empire split in two halves and the capital moved to Constantinople. Around this time, the inhabitants of Rome changed their trading habits — and the new trade routes seem to have brought a fresh influx of ancestry into the region, Pritchard says. “People aren’t just trading with the north and the west, but their population is being replaced by new people coming in from those places.”

Race replacement!  But alas for “movement” narratives, the “race replacement” coinciding with “a phase of gradual dissolution”- the decline and fall – was coming from “the north and west.”

Der Movement, Der Movement, Der Movement marches on.

Get this, from that same article; Pritchard describing the data:

…a pleasant surprise…

Pleasant?  

Value judgments about scientific data? That crosses the line separating science from politics. I’ve always said that population genetics is a highly politicized field and this article is yet more evidence. These guys can’t just report their results. They need to “interpret” the data to the great unwashed – pontificating about the wonderfully surprising “diversity” of ancient cities.  Population shifts and replacements – pleasant.  And of course Pritchard is not alone. Ever notice that papers stressing the Middle Eastern ancestry of Ashkenazi Jews, and the consequent asserted continuity of modern Jews to the Levant, tend to come from Israel? Papers that stress continuity between ancient and modern Greeks tend to have Greek authors?  Papers that stress differences between Northern vs. Southern Italy tend to have Northern Italian authors? Papers that stress admixture and population shifts are typically about Europe?  That Chinese population geneticists are not going out of their way to interpret data to delegitimize the Han Chinese ethnography of their nation?  Coincidence?

I’m not saying the data are false and/or fabricated. Instead, similarly to what I have written about ancestry testing companies, the types of samples used and the types of analyses performed can determine the direction of the findings. Choices of parental populations, choices of analytical methods, underlying assumptions, etc. can create marked differences in the data output.  Further, how these people choose to interpret the findings can be highly subjective.

Never mind that all these guys are allergic to genetic kinship assays.

In any case, how about this for an interpretation – the city of Rome was “diverse” and the Roman Empire collapsed, a “pleasant” correlation there.

Hey, here’s your “alpha” Supreme Court Justice, Alt Right retards. Maybe we can have more analysis from Roissy of Trump and Kavanaugh shaking hands or how each one stands up straight (or in the case of "big paunch" Trump, does not).  

This is a good Strom piece, but if he believes all of this, why doesn’t he openly and explicitly denounce the Jewish-Asian HBD cult?

Let’s rewrite some of it.

….what Sir John Harington said about treason in the 17th century. Harington was wondering why one hears so little about treason; he asked Why does treason not prosper? It must not be prospering, since we never hear about it — right? Wrong. Harington said: “Treason doth never prosper: what’s the reason? For if it prosper, none dare call it treason.” 

Similarly, today, few dare call into question the promotion of open borders, racial mixing, mass immigration, and slavish support for Israel and all things anti-White by the supposed “American” media — and few dare mention the real ethnic loyalties and background of the billionaire media elite — because to do so would bring smears, economic repercussions, legal persecution and sometimes even physical violence down on the truth-teller.

….what Sir John Harington said about treason in the 17th century. Harington was wondering why one hears so little about treason; he asked Why does treason not prosper? It must not be prospering, since we never hear about it — right? Wrong. Harington said: “Treason doth never prosper: what’s the reason? For if it prosper, none dare call it treason.”

Similarly, today, few dare call into question the promotion of slavish worship of “high Jewish and Asian IQ,” aracial cognitive elitism, intra-European division, “race realist” lies and fairy tales, Jeurasian mongrelization, outrageously transparent pseudoscience, and all things anti-White by the supposed “movement” HBD faction— and few dare mention the real ethnic loyalties and background of the HBD elite — because to do so would bring smears, “movement” repercussions, and labels of “crazy and bitter” on the truth-teller.

If you tune in and see some Republican or Democrat talking head promoting another war or promoting more immigration or pretending he opposes more immigration on the television, and you switch it off immediately and more importantly forever, that doesn’t make the traitors stop existing. But it does give you a chance to perceive the world primarily with your own eyes and ears, and to draw your own conclusions instead of having them spoon-fed to you.

If you go online and see some HBDer talking head promoting intra-European division or promoting Jew-Asian worship or pretending he opposes more Asian immigration, and you switch it off immediately and more importantly forever, that doesn’t make the traitors stop existing. But it does give you a chance to perceive the world primarily with your own eyes and ears, and to draw your own conclusions instead of having them spoon-fed to you.

See how easy it is, Kevin?

The Emperor Has No Clothes

Blackpill Trump Friday.  Emphasis added.

Long time readers of this blog remember that during the 2016 Presidential campaign I openly questioned whether Trump really wanted to be President. I speculated that, at least unconsciously, he didn’t want to win, he did not want to trade his hedonistic NY lifestyle for a somewhat less hedonistic (but still indulgent) DC lifestyle.  Thus we read:

Lewis also said Trump sat staring at the TV in disbelief when he saw he'd won.

There we go.

Vice President Mike Pence tried to kiss his wife, Karen Pence, in the minutes after Donald Trump won the presidential election in November 2016, but she reportedly turned away from him and said: "You got what you wanted, Mike. Now leave me alone."

Alpha male Pence!  Actually, considering what Pence’s wife looks like, he should be grateful for this rejection.  Speaking of “female” appearance, why was a 70 year old man with a wig testifying in front of Congress about being sexually assault by Keg Kav back in the 80s?  I was expecting a woman in her 50s.

Meanwhile, Karen Pence "wouldn't so much as say hello to Trump," Michael Lewis, the author of "Moneyball" and "The Big Short," wrote in a Guardian long read based on several interviews with Trump insiders and published Thursday.

And Trump picked Pence for his VP.

In an account of Trump's unexpected win and chaotic transition into the White House, Lewis wrote that after clinching Pennsylvania's electoral votes at 1:35 a.m. on November 9, thereby winning the election, Trump "just stared at the TV without saying anything, like a man with a pair of twos whose bluff has been called."

The Alt Right’s bluff was called as well.  And they folded.

What I had to say about Trump the day before the election:

Yes, Trump is a vulgar ignorant buffoon, a Negro-loving beta race cuck civic nationalist with a Jewified family, an overweight imbecile, a lazy and ill-prepared debater, an embarrassment of a political candidate, a blustering clown, and a crass jackass. Nevertheless, as SJW America perceives Trump as being a “racist fascist bigot,” a Trump electoral victory will do a fine job of destabilizing the multicultural consensus, balkanizing society, enraging the Coloreds and the Left, creating chaos, and weakening the System.  

Remember, at that time, Der Movement was foaming at the mouth about how Trump was “the last chance for White America,” a “great man” who will be an “American Caesar” and “make America great again.”

Are you surprised about who was right and who was wrong?

In Der News, 9/24/18

More commentary. In all cases, emphasis added.

Read this.

Deborah Ramirez, 53, told the New Yorker that Kavanaugh exposed himself at a college dorm party when they were both studying at Yale, “thrust his penis in her face, and caused her to touch it without her consent as she pushed him away.”

“Brett was laughing,” she told the magazine, which posted the story Sunday night. “I can still see his face, and his hips coming forward, like when you pull up your pants.”

Ramirez claims that a male student brought out a fake plastic penis at the party, where the group was playing a drinking game. At one point, she claims another male student exposed himself and other students encouraged her to “kiss it.”

“I wasn’t going to touch a penis until I was married,” Ramirez, a devout Catholic, said. “I was embarrassed and ashamed and humiliated.”

Yes, indeed, she’s a devout Catholic!  So devout and so devoted to not touching a penis until married (and maybe not even then!) that she attended a “college dorm party” “where the group was playing a drinking game.”  Her priest would have approved, no doubt!  Hint: you wouldn't have been "embarrassed and ashamed and humiliated" if you had been spending your time studying, instead of attending - like a devout Catholic should! - drunken dorm parties.  

First, even if it happened, so what?  Second, all these stories only reinforce the idea that women have no business being involved in any serious aspects of human society. We should have sex-segregated dorms; better yet, sex-segregated colleges and universities.

HBD marches on; the despicable Zman:

The new opposition that is forming up in opposition to Team Brown is explicitly white, as well as nationalist and populist. While it is not explicitly antisemitic, despite what some claim, it will certainly be hostile to the sort of cosmopolitanism Jews have historically preferred. Jews could be left without a home…That said, Jews are the most adaptive people in human history. There’s no reason why Jews in America could not simply throw in with the white majority. Just as the neocons broke with the Left over opposition to the Soviets, perhaps liberal Jews will break with the Left over the issue of identity politics. After all, in a balkanized country, the only way for a tiny minority to survive is to attach to the most powerful tribe. Given the options on Team Brown, Team White is going to look like a better option, assuming the option is open.

Consider - “There’s no reason why Jews in America could not simply throw in with the white majority… assuming the option is open."

How about we make damn sure that the option is not open?  I believe in accountability…let the Asiatic Levantine Middle Eastern Jews lie in the bed they made.  “Team Brown” is in large part a Jewish creation, this people has been waging war on the White majority for endless decades – what now? – we have to embrace them if they are “left without a home?”  So we can have Hart proposing a multiracial “White separatist state” or Weissberg telling us we should support the “racial status quo” and equating WNs with child molesters or maybe Levin suggesting that racial preservation for its own sake is crazy?  No sir.  They have a home.  It’s called Israel.  Don’t let the door hit you on the way out.  

We have no obligation to provide a safe haven to the enemy.  Why should we?  To put it in language both the Levantines and their HBD worshippers can understand: to allow the Jews, after all they’ve done and knowing what they are, to “join the White majority” would be like Israel giving a welcoming refuge to “Nazi war criminals.”  Sorry, it isn’t an option.

She's...HuWhite.

That’s not saying much, Richie.  The great Mudshark Annie, another affirmative action case with piss-poor judgment – remember “In Trump We Trust?’’ Or are current shilling for Antifa Jeff Sessions, also known as Sleepy Jeff?

The God Emperor: all bluster, no action. If Sessions is sleepy, then Trump is comatose. Except, of course, when Donnie Fats wants to pardon some Negro criminals – that really gets the juices flowing, said juices ready for the next Big Mac or the next porn star.

More Hitler worship.

Yeah, Kev, you know, as someone who has intensely studied Hitler and National Socialism for most of my life, I can’t help but notice that “changed stance” of Hitler and his regime toward a more “Pan-Aryan” (whatever that means) concept mysteriously coincided with Germany starting to lose the war, and desiring additional allies (i.e., cannon fodder) among non-Germanic Europeans to desperately try and stop the Soviets from over-running Germany,

It’s true that there were genuinely Pan-European (a more descriptive and accurate term than “Pan-Aryan”) elements within the Waffen SS, but these were ignored and powerless, and the Nordicist “Black SS” faction dominant, until after Stalingrad, when the need for non-Germanic stepandfetchits necessitated a surface veneer change in policy (sort of like Pierce’s National Alliance, eh?).  Even then, Hitler’s conception of “Europe” meant a Europe dominated by Germany – sort of like we have now, and we all know how well that’s been working out, with a childless, broad-faced Borreby hag presiding over the invasion and conquest of Europe by “Team Brown.”

Behold the Female and Other News

Odds and ends.

Afrowop “game” – red font emphasis added:

After a Sopranos episode in which his character brutally beat a young stripper to death, during an interview he stated, “After the episode aired a lot more women started hitting on me. I thought it was very revealing.”

Indeed it was.  After all, women fall in love with serial killers; White women love abusive Negro males.  We’re supposed to take women seriously though, let them vote, and pontificate about “MeToo” and sexual harassment.  Why do men put up with it?  Because they think with their groins, rather than their heads – see next item.

But, before that – a comment.  All joking and ridicule aside, of course women can – in theory - play an important positive role in racial activism (albeit not in any position of leadership) as well as play important roles in society as a whole (also not in positions of leadership).  But in order for that to be even remotely acceptable, women need to speak out honestly about “the woman problem” – as exemplified by the bizarre behavior discussed by Pantoliano (and by any MGTOW or “game” website).  This behavior – just like the “love letters to serial killers” thing – is as bizarre to White men as is the behavior of the most savage Negro tribe in the heart of darkest Africa.  Yes, yes, the gamesters put forth a reasonable hypothesis – that females misread psychopathic male behavior as “alpha” and thus as sexually desirable – but that’s the problem you see.  If women are so unable to control their impulses that they behave in a bizarrely insane manner, what good are they other than for sex and reproduction?  The defense would be that psychopathic male behavior is for women what female beauty is for men, and so it is natural for women to love abusive male criminals and therefore nothing can (or should) be done about it.  If that’s true, then women are hopeless and have no place in any organized activity, no place near any lever of power, and no place near any decision-making authority whatsoever.

And, further, women never honestly address their sick behaviors – they “double down” on them.  “MeToo” is an example of this madness – the women who typically behave as Pantoliano describes are the same ones going on social media to decry some man who looked at a woman the “wrong way” 15,000 millennia ago.  The same women who decry “being objectified” pose on social media half naked.  So, no, until women reform, they will continue to get scorn and ridicule here. And since we know they will never reform, expect more references to “yeastbuckets” at EGI Notes.

To be fair, I have to say I agree with Derbyshire here. Even if the accusation against Kavanaugh is true, for goddssakes, who cares?  Some drunken sexual fumbling at a party during high school?  Is everyone insane?  What does it matter?  Where were all these tearful MeToo yeastbags during the Clinton Presidency?  And, oh, yes, if they’ve “wised up” since then, how come they don’t denounce him NOW, and protest his every public appearance?  Why don’t they turn on his “wife” for enabling his behavior?  Ah, no…because it is all politics, all play-acting.  And, no, men don’t need some fat Hawaiian gook telling us to “shut up.”  You shut up, filthy scum.

Having said all that, from my MGTOW perspective, I don’t approve of the behavior ascribed to the teen-aged Kavanaugh.  I’d like to see men - and here I include teen-aged boys – exhibit a bit more sexual self-control, a bit more restraint.  If the scenario played out as described, I see it as a victory for the female, especially as it never progressed more than a brief fervid fumbling groping.  Making males lose self-control, using their sexuality to control and manipulate men and boys, living amongst white-knighting betas and pussy-pedestalizing gamesters – these yeastbuckets have the world in their hands, and then engage in gaslighting crying about the “patriarchy” oppressing them.  Fact is, the ONLY power they have is via their sexuality, and they damn well know it, and use it.  Amused mastery is the response, not sweaty obsession and drunken groping.  If the action actually took place, I see Kavanaugh as the victim – he has to be publicly humiliated decades later because some girl – who Derbyshire rightly labels a bit “slutty” – triggered his sexual lusts.  No doubt she went to the party wanting to be lusted over.  No, she probably didn’t want to get pawed at (but who knows?), but what the hell was the purpose of that party to begin with, I wonder?  To discuss Cartesian philosophy?

Consider that Derbyshire is also correct that the Supreme Court has morphed into our National Legislature, and we can see the importance of all of this to EGI.  The composition of the court helps decide policy on issue of race and immigration and thus has a direct bearing on the genetic composition of the American population today and in the future.  That high school party decades ago directly affects the gene frequencies of America today, and for the years to come.

But, but, but…he’s the “God Emperor!”  It’s “4-D chess.”

Always remember…when the quota queens were gushing over Touchback Trump as “the last chance for White America” and as an “American Caesar who will solve the demographic problem,” EGI Notes was saying from the very beginning that Trump was a vulgar ignorant buffoon and a fraud, and that the only reason to support him was of the public perception of him, which was (and still is) promoting chaos and balkanization.  The man himself is the ultimate lazy do-nothing loser.  He’s rich?  His father’s money, his New York connections, and lots of bluster did the trick.  In Jew-dominated America, we must remember that wealth accumulation can occur via many mechanisms that have little to nothing to do with actual merit, achievement, or productivity.  Trump’s a cipher – a Big Mac-gobbling zero.  

Capitalism leads to racial degeneration and genocide.  Don’t get me wrong, a supply-and-demand free market economy is best – my socialism is political (like Yockey’s) rather than economic – but there’s no choice if one has to choose between a socialist Europe and a capitalist Eurafrica.  Communism with racial homogeneity is, literally, infinitely better form an EGI standpoint than genocidal capitalism.