Questions for Greggy

No answers are expected to be delivered.

See this.

Let’s start with the whole “keeping Richard Spencer’s coke dealer away from an Amren conference” thing.

First, Johnson deftly ignores the point about the homosexual cabal within Der Movement and instead concentrates on his alleged role vetting for Amren, and on Pilleater’s accusations of cocaine use at Amren conferences by the Spencer faction.

By the way, Pilleater’s accusations are either true or false. For the sake of argument, in this post I will assume that they are true (I do not know if this is really the case), but if they are false, then that was slander on the part of Pilleater, a defamation repeated in writing by Johnson.

Is Johnson really vetting people for Amren meetings? Some people claimed in livestreams/podcasts that Amren staff denied that and that Johnson has to apologize to Taylor for stating that, but I do not know if that is true.

What makes Johnson, a victim of the Hermansson and Lewis infiltrations, in any way qualified to vet for anyone about anything?

If Pilleater’s accusations were true, what does that say about Amren conferences and their vetting and about a “movement” that elevated Spencer to positions of leadership, including that of The National Policy Institute (NPI)?

If the cocaine thing is true, given that the System allegedly is hostile to Spencer, Amren, Der Movement, etc., was the whole “illegal drug use at Amren conferences” accusation ever investigated?  If yes, why no charges?  If not, why not? The whole thing seems rather strange. It reminds me of an incident I am aware of (the details of which I will not disclose) in which a past inept Grand Poobah did something wrong that was adjudicated through the legal system in some manner, but was not known to the rank-and-file at large (being a more local incident), and there can be no doubt that the watchdog groups had to know about it, and yet the watchdogs never reported it, and thus protected that “leader” from having his status diminished. It’s almost as if the System doesn’t want to eliminate incompetent Quota Queens filling the leadership niche space of pro-White activism.

Now, let’s turn to Johnson’s characterization of Pilleater’s sexual harassment complaints as “Gay guy meets other gay and flirtation occurs.”  Putting aside the question as to why flirtation of any kind, much less homosexual flirtation, is appropriate for a pro-White meeting, we can ask the following. Doesn’t Pilleater identify as bisexual rather than gay (after all, Johnson thinks it funny that Pilleater brought an Asiatrix girlfriend to a pro-White meeting)?  Didn’t Pilleater complain about actual harassment, rather than just “flirtation?” And what’s Johnson’s comment about “BelieveAllWomen” about? Is he equating bisexual man Pilleater with a woman?  And if Johnson mocks “BelieveAllWomen” why does he believe Spencer’s ex-wife (see below)?

The “LOL. Your absence will not be noted for missed” is juvenile.  Moving on:

Johnson then says “I am sure you witnessed several lifetimes worth of degeneracy at the loft in Alexandria.”

I wonder what Polignano witnessed in a San Francisco apartment, but that’s another story. If Spencer is all that Johnson believes he is then what does it say about Der Movement, Regnery, CMS, and NPI for elevating Spencer to positions of authority?  Affirmative action, anyone?

Johnson nitpicks that he “never used the phrase ‘handsome, blossoming guy.”  OK, but does he deny using the word “blossoming” to describe Pilleater’s brother?  Does he understand why some people would think it strange that a middle-aged man would describe a younger man as “blossoming?”

Johnson then talks about a “psychopath who beat his wife during both of her pregnancies,” which, given the context of the comment, is certainly about Spencer. Johnson then says he believes Nina – BelieveAllWomen?

If Johnson believes this, then please tell us - what qualifications Spencer had to be made the head of NPI?

Johnson then mocks people concerned about “poor Pilleater” (what about “poor Nina?”), who are, he avers, actually interested in smearing poor Greg. But if there is nothing wrong in the Pilleater recording, re: Johnson, then how could he be smeared by it?  What is false about the recording? Johnson then asks if a “Forney livestream” is “the appropriate forum” for people to deal with Pilleater’s complaints. Very well.  What should they do instead?  Perhaps support Pilleater filing a legal complaint about being sexually harassed?  Would that be an appropriate forum?

Some may respond to this by asserting that this focus on people (and events) rather than ideas is indicative of “low thinking.” But, alas, in the end, this is about ideas: That Der Movement is a disaster because of failed leadership (and their poor judgment) and because of the low quality of its personnel, and this is tied to Der Movement’s ethnic affirmative action policy. As Nietzsche said, people can be used as lenses through which ideas can be focused upon.

Odds and Ends, 10/5/20

In der news.

Comment about HBDer John Engelman:

HT  Samuel Hathaway 

John believes Democrat policies whereby the government takes money from whites and gives it to blacks is the best solution.

Never forget that HBD is a political movement aimed at disenfranchising and dispossessing Whites.

Genuine scientist?  Laughable. See this in response.

This is your “movement.”

Johnson-Goad: Greg Johnson wants to recruit Roissy for Counter-Currents.  That sounds just about right. Pathetic.

Let us remember what Johnson wrote about Roissy in the past:

For several years now, the website I read more than any other has been Chateau Heartiste, formerly known as Chateau Roissy…But, for all the pleasure and knowledge I have derived from these and other manosphere writers, I am increasingly drawn to the view that the net result of the manosphere is to morally corrupt men.

If Roissy ends up working for Johnson, we can consider the "over-under" odds of how long would it be before Johnson and Roissy have a falling out, and for Roissy to end up on the Matt Forney show to discuss Johnson.

Back to Johnson-Goad: Wow! Derbyshire gets his work down to exactly 1000 words!  A mathematician!  A genius!  Stunning!   Er…you do know that Word has a word count feature, right?  All one needs to do is write an essay that is within a couple of hundred words of 1000 and then edit until you reach 1000. It is actually fairly simple to do, but the real question is whether why anyone would want to submit articles that are all exactly 1000 words.  Carefully consider the character of such an individual who would even bother doing so (I doubt Taki required articles to be exactly 1000 words, otherwise there was no point to discuss Derbyshire’s “genius” in this regard, as everyone would be doing the same).

I must say that the Alt Right has pretty low standards for being impressed by someone’s cognitive abilities.  He can write essays of exactly 1000 words!  Another Newton!  Another Goethe!  Another da Vinci!

Listen to this.  Does Johnson live in Budapest as Forney claims?  Ethnonationalism!

Yawn…boring:

When my mom visited me in Eastern Europe…

Not Denmark.

After the Last 42 Years of Movement Affirmative Action

And other news.

William Pierce 1978:

Eventually the printed-propaganda arm of the Alliance must be continuously generating a veritable flood of new material, ranging from serious newspapers to ideologically oriented romances and agitational pamphlets.

But even as this arm continues to grow, we need other capabilities. We need, for example, a fund-raising capability: a branch of the Alliance consisting of people with an expertise in obtaining the money we must have, whether from mass mailings, personal solicitations, or other means. We have no such cadres on our staff now.

We need a legal capability, not only for defending ourselves in the courts when necessary, but also for using the courts in an aggressive manner, for going on the offensive legally when the opportunity arises. At the present we have not even one legal cadre in the Washington area.

We need a business capability, a sales capability, for building the circulation of our newspaper and our other publications. This capability will require cadres who concern themselves with placing our publications in independent bookstores and newsstands, with advertising in other publications (including the mass media), with establishing and maintaining far larger numbers of news racks for NV sales than we have now. This is an extremely important capability, and it is one which is almost nonexistent now. It cannot wait much longer.

We will need a public-speaking capability, a branch of the Alliance concerned with carrying our message orally to groups of people everywhere, whether to a meeting of patriotic organizations or to bystanders at a public protest demonstration. Occasionally one or another cadre now on the National Office staff does this, but we need cadres who specialize in it, who learn how to find and exploit every opportunity for doing it, who learn how to make their own opportunities.

And we will need, one day, a branch of the Alliance which has the capability for dealing successfully in an extra-legal way with extra-legal attacks against us. That is, we must eventually develop a military capability.

Gee…doesn’t that all sound familiar?  Forty two years later, in 2020, that sounds like our wish list today, and we are farther away from all that now than we were back in 1978.

So, 42 years later, we have Johnson and all the rest asking for money, so they can maintain their pitiful blogs – as far as “legal cadre” goes, we still “have not even one.”  Again, 42 years later, “fund raising” is tin cup panhandling on the Internet, hampered by deplatforming from payment processors.  “Business capability” 42 years later is being dependent on the System, and being deplatformed. As far as “public speaking” goes, Spencer got chased off campuses by Antifa, which comes down to the last tragicomedy – “the capability for dealing successfully in an extra-legal way with extra-legal attacks against us.” Yes, these guys can’t even show their face in public without being physically assaulted, assaulted with impunity.

So, no offense, but maybe, just maybe, something is wrong here?  Maybe 42 years of “movement leadership” by people surnamed “Pierce” and “Johnson” and “Spencer” and “Taylor,” et al. have led us to the sorry state?  Isn’t 42 years of Quota Queen affirmative action failure enough for you?

And getting back to Pierce – if that’s what he thought should be done, then why didn’t he do it?  Why didn’t he suck it up, make sacrifices, show leadership, and put up with the “big city DC area atmosphere” he hated so much to do what was best for the race and get this infrastructure built?  Why not?  Why was it necessary to run away to the mountains of West Virginia, separated from, and isolated from, the main currents of society, collecting “membership dues,” selling books, making strident broadcasts and producing mediocre cookie-cutter propaganda never tailored to any local conditions, and engaging in serial monogamy?   It was because of this failure of judgment, this failure of will, this indulgence of his “twigs and branches hobbit hole” preferences, that there was no depth to the National Alliance other than the William Pierce personality (such as it was) cult, resulting in the organization effectively collapsing after his death.  All of our vaunted leaders pontificate on “things that need to be done,” but they never want to be the ones who have to do it.  But they are willing to soak up all the financial resources.  They are never shy about asking for money, are they?

By the way, in Lewontin’s infamous paper, he referred to “human populations” – a very generic term supporting the reality that the “more genetic variation within than between” applies to any and all human populations.  Indeed, there HAS TO BE more within than between given the level of genetic heterozygosity inherent in the genome and the random genetic variation that exists among individuals. Making an issue of this is has always been pure Jewish sophistry.

See more here.

Laugh at this.  That’s your “movement.”  I have to say though I disagree with Forney about covid-19 (*), the over-estimation of "Amnats" (the entire "movement" is a joke), and his misunderstanding of the value of democratic multiculturalism.  Making Whites and men into "victims" is not an end to itself, but a strategy to expose System hypocrisy, mobilize Whites (particularly White men), heighten the contradictions, and make multiculturalism untenable - when everyone can claim a victim status, then the whole rotten edifice may begin to crumble under the weight of its own absurdity.

I agree though that the numbnuts of The National Justice Party and not suitable for getting anything useful done.

*I basically am on the verge of vomiting every time I read or hear some idiot on the Right refer to masks as "face diapers" and rage about the horrific attack on our "freedom" by making people wear face masks during a pandemic.

Now, if you want to make an empirical argument against the efficacy of face masks then please do so, but the idea that wearing "face diapers" is some sort of new multiculturalist globalist conspiracy against our "freedom" is ludicrous.  During the 1918-1919 flu pandemic, masking was also compulsory, there were controversies about it even back then - in an America that was racially segregated and only a few years away from passing the Reed-Johnson  Act - and in some American cities, police were shooting people who were out in public and who refused to wear masks. So, no, wearing masks during a pandemic is not some sort of new-fangled malicious idea thought up by the modern custodial state.

And with respect to your "freedom" - more than 60 years ago, Eisenhower forcibly integrated American schools at bayonet point.  "Civil rights laws" gutted your freedom of association, and your freedom of speech is rapidly vanishing.  But, hey, choose public health measures in a pandemic as the hill you want to die on, to make your stand about "freedom."  Why must the Right be so childish?

Odds and Ends, 6/21/20

In der news. In all cases, emphasis added.

Another example of how ethnonationalists ruin everything they touch:

1999, a manifesto of a second 'European Liberation Front' was published in Paris, but there is apparently no more active organisation of that name now. The manifesto takes its ideological inspiration from Yockey, and from Otto Strasser, who was expelled from the Nazi Party by Adolf Hitler in 1930.

Despite the pan-European style of its title, the ideology of the manifesto is ethnic and racial nationalism…

Take over the name of Yockey’s organization and then promote an opposing ideology.  Very good!  Hail Der Movement!

Authentic pan-Europeanism does not exist in any organization of which I am aware over the last 50 years or more, except Lowell's in Malta.

Forney on Spencer Part I.  Part II.

Note that I do not agree on Forney on all his comments, but, nevertheless, the rank-and-file needs to understand where their affirmative action program leads.  I also find Forney’s glee at Spencer’s problems unseemly.  It is not funny, it is a tragedy.  I don’t care about Spencer himself, but we all need to realize that the White public – you know, the folks that your “movement” wants to recruit from – do not make fine distinctions between Spencer, Johnson, Forney, Taylor et al.  It’s all one.  Spencer’s downfall therefore reflects badly on the entirety of racial activism in the public "mind."  

That downfall, ultimately, derives from the lack of judgment of “movement” “elites.”  Spencer should never have been allowed to be the head of NPI in the first place; that position should have gone to an older individual with more experience, maturity, and gravitas. Spencer should instead have been groomed for electoral politics, as the smiling young face of the Far Right, with mature adults as his behind-the-scenes handlers. 

The past cannot be changed. But going forward, the affirmative program needs to be eliminated.  That is step one.  It’s not a case of a single rotten apple that needs to be gotten rid of, it’s a whole case.  And as soon as one apple becomes so horribly decayed that it is thrown out, another one joins in. The entire crate needs to be thrown out, and the entire process of picking rotten apples changed.

A sincere man of genuine greatness.

Glad to see we got dem dere Republican conservative judges like “Earl Warren Jr.” Roberts there.

I’m no fan of Rushton, but the retraction of his hypothesis paper was unfair and disgusting, and I agree with this analysis, which is a refutation of leftist hysteria that helped get the paper unfairly retracted.  I also agree with the analysis in that the author of the leftist attack on Rushton-Templar doesn't understand what pleiotropy is, possibly confusing it with epistasis (or who knows what).  I am also amused by the leftist critique of Rushton-Templar for having a "political bias." Hoho!  What about the leftist critic's bias?  Would he care to inform us on his views on say, race in America?  What's his party affiliation?  Who did he vote for in 2016? What about, say, Lewontin's biases?  Any comments on that?

If the Rushton-Templar paper was inherently flawed – even as a hypothesis – and this somehow escaped the notice of the reviewers at that time, then the appropriate response is to write a paper (for publication) refuting the Rushton-Templar logic and/or do studies that produce data refuting the Rushton-Templar hypothesis. Retracting the paper is politically motivated censorship, leading us to a scientific dark ages. The retraction is a disgrace.

Hey, it’s time for Trump to tweet LAW AND ORDER!  That’ll fix it.  Fat Don is like, you know, demonstrating his sincerity and his genuine greatness!

I was looking at Amazon reviews of Robert Griffin’s One Sheaf One Vine book, of interest to me since I am one of the people featured in it.  Two excerpts from the comments I found amusing:

1. Interesting anthropological study. Nothing really new here, but contains only interview available of Alex Linder. No other interviews with people who would go on to become personages. 

That’s a stinging rebuke of my lack of accomplishment I suppose.

2. Another observation I make, is that none of the people in the book, offer any solutions to the racial problems they criticize. In numerous cases, they simply flee those high-'diversity' problems by moving to other, whiter states. But none of them seem to envision the new domiciles undergoing future change.

Let’s see.  I spend a significant portion of my interview talking about practical things that should be done.  So it would seem that this individual lacks any reading comprehension skills whatsoever.  As well, with respect to the second half of the criticism, I’m not one of the “numerous cases” since that’s nowhere in my section.

Also interesting is that if you search on Amazon for a book like this, you get “suggested reading” consisting of a host of anti-White diatribes.  Like Google, Amazon is another company I am going to personally “deplatform” from any spending.

Thus in summary: Sallis right, Johnson wrong.

Kevin Strom:

The purpose of the race that is is to bring into being the race that is to come. Let’s concentrate on that. Let’s concentrate on being the ones who decide that.

I have been in this cause of ours for nearly 40 years. I have seen and heard and read so much wasted verbiage about why Russians or eastern Europeans generally, or southern Europeans generally, or even other odd subracial or national combinations should be read out of the White race. I have heard it all, please don’t repeat it to me. I’m sick of it.

The group or groups which coalesce to save our endangered race will be the ones who determine its genetic future. Beyond the obvious aesthetic that we know White when we see it, and a future that can include (but not be totally ruled by) accurate genetic testing, that’s all we need to know. If the White future is primarily Russian or Hungarian, so be it. If the White future is primarily pan-European American with strong German, Anglo, and Irish components, so be it. If the White future is predominantly Greek or Italian or Bulgarian or Nordic, so be it. None of us are in a position to pick and choose right now, nor does such picking and choosing make sense during this crisis.

Let’s just admit that every single group and sub-group of Europeans has racially devolved — due to dysgenics, due to genetic drift, due to past mixtures. Let’s just admit that every single White nationality could be — and, if we have anything to say about it, will be — helped by a healthy dose of eugenics.

But never forget this: We are targeted and marked for death as Whites. It is as Whites — not as dolichocephalic Red Nordids, or Paleo-Atlantids, or western Europeans only — that we must become awakened and fight back.

Very good; I obviously agree.  But then Strom has to admit that much of the work of Pierce and of the National Alliance was and is de facto opposed to that pan-European view. As regards Pierce accepting people with fractional Amerindian ancestry (and Pierce’s gibbering about “Caucasian” Amerindian tribes is nonsense - whatever their appearance, they are racial aliens from Asia), we must remember that the “Indian princess” stories – real or imagined – typically derive from “Nordish” Anglo-Americans. They’ve always gotten a “pass” for that – the “Pace Amendment” for example.

By the way, even Yockey himself wasn’t immune to a touch of Nordicism, with respect to his rhapsodizing about “Northern barbarians” in both Imperium and, more especially, Thoughts Personal and Superpersonal. I suppose we can forgive Yockey for that lapse, since the broader “movement” he derives from has always been marinated in Nordicism, but it is rather hypocritical of him given his pontifications about horizontal vs. vertical race.  And what would he think today, with all of the “Northern Barbarians” being the biggest race cucks of them all?

And by the way, Yockeyites past and present should know that The Doctrine of Fascism they so admire was really written by Giovanni Gentile, not Benito Mussolini.  But Gentile was one of those two foot tall superstitious Sicilians who so vexed Humphrey Ireland, so who cares about facts?

Newly discovered!  A film clip of Humphrey Ireland being overwhelmed by the scurrying Sicilian hordes.

Johnson Contra Sallis

Silver we can merely laugh at.  Johnson, in contrast, is legally libelous.

Let’s get the most personally relevant comments out of the way first:

Silvio Silver

@silviosilver14w

@NewRightAmerica

A debate I'd love to see, but which I know will never happen, is Greg and "Ted Sallis."  The latter is a loudmouthed lout who has never been able to civilly disagree with anyone, but if you can look past that, there is actually some substance there.

Silver terms me a “loudmouthed lout who has never been able to civilly disagree with anyone.”  The following is a direct quote from Silver writing about yours truly:

Who cares what that shiteating asshole thinks? Are you that goddam thick, Dave Johns, that you can’t understand what a pure, unadulterated asshole that vermin is? Are you that damn thick that you can’t realize the only reason he can’t fairly characterize my position is that I mock his absurd attempts to whiten himself with his“tests”? That the whole reason he’s such a grouch is that he feels vulnerable about his whiteness and feels compelled to savage and ridicule anyone and everyone even a smidgeon less white than what his exacting standards require, even though doing so is not remotely required for advancing a pro-white agenda, and is, in fact, counterproductive? Are you that damn thick? Sadly, I think the answer is yes, you are that damn thick. Try this, Davey boy: think for yourself. If you can pinpoint anything I say (now, not one year ago—which is the only thing shiteater has to go on) which you think compromises white interests, let’s have you bring it up. Otherwise, pay attention to what I actually say; not to what self-interested shiteaters claim I say. 

I don’t discuss that here because nutzi dumbfucks like Braun and Rienzi are the greater problem. I don’t care what label these assholes give themselves. They are the purest of human shit imaginable, to me.

Unfortunately, I am unable to summon the ability to match Silver’s eloquence and civility in my own writing. Silver is also the person who was participating in a discussion at the race/history/evolution notes blog that included unfounded suggestions (“evidently”) of a homosexual relationship between Johnson and Polignano (*see footnote). If the “evident” accusation is incorrect, then it was libelous, although that doesn’t stop a Counter-Currents writer from praising the race/history/evolution notes blog, nor Johnson from being online pals with “Silver.” Interesting. 

See this for a summary.  Also see this.

Now for Johnson’s libelous reply:

Counter-Currents

@NewRightAmerica

He's intelligent, but his intellect has been ruined by insanity. I regret tolerating him and people like Parrott as long as I did. Better people saw it as indecent. It harmed my reputation.

Does Johnson have evidence that I am insane?  If not, that is legally actionable libel. Note that Johnson doesn’t say that Sallis “behaves as if he's insane” nor does he express an opinion or ask a question.  Rather he makes a blanket statement implying fact.  Libel.

Yes, I’m so "insane" that I actually interact with the real world, as opposed to Johnson who has been holed up as a full time activist for many years, feuding with and alienating one activist after another (including some of his own past writers and collaborators), while living off of the donations of the deluded fools hoodwinked by his faux-intellectual pretensions. Those by the way are facts coupled with opinions. Note no accusations of “insanity” or of any other mental illness. Johnson’s “career” as a full time “activist” is a matter of public record.  His requests for donations are also a matter of public record. My opinion of his work as “faux-intellectual pretensions” is an opinion supported by my critical analysis of his "work."  It seems that only the “insane” understand the difference between fact, opinion, and libel.  

And given what happened to Polignano, we should all be wary when Johnson recklessly throws around libelous accusations about the mental health of others. If Friberg’s correspondence was accurate, then at least Polignano admitted having issues. I have no issues. As I’ve repeatedly stated on this blog, the “over the top” comments here are intentionally parodying the crazed nonsense of Der Movement. It is mocking satire.  Of course, I can understand where humorless pendants obsessed with their own self-importance would take everything at face value.  No names, of course.

One can compare EGI Notes, specifically designed to mix analytical material with “movement” deconstruction and mocking ridicule, with Western Destiny, which, while critical of the “movement,” eschews mocking ridicule and sticks with a completely serious tone.

Does Johnson detect “insanity” in Western Destiny as well?  Further, would an “insane” individual discreetly keep quiet about all of the “movement” “dirty laundry” they know about – and in some cases personally experienced – dating back to the mid-1990s?  That can be contrasted to the “sane” Quota Queens who constantly air “movement” “dirty laundry” in their never-ending feuds. In addition, an “insane” person would not protect the interests of a person they despise by withholding the large amount of stylometric data that yields quite interesting findings indeed.  What would one of the “sane” feuders do with that, I wonder?

Essentially, Johnson is engaging in cheap Frankfurt School-like pathologization of dissent. If you are (a) a critic of Johnson, and (b) more intelligent than the typical “movement” nitwits Johnson intellectually runs rings around, then you’re “insane” – which conveniently gives the coward an excuse not to engage with your ideas, and, most importantly, frees Johnson from the obligation of having to defend his own ideas.

Err, Greg, you would lose any honest debate with me, which is why I’m “banned” from your blog.  Open it up there. Have you and your hypocritical writers defend their positions.  But, no, you coward, you do not do so.  Just like you ran from Friberg when the latter invited you (or so he says, do you deny it?) to a “sit down.” I’m calling you out as a coward who runs from those who can call you out on your bullshit. I openly challenge you to open your blog comments up for debate.

As far as your “reputation” goes, you harmed it yourself (the Pilleater call was itself enough; the infiltrations were another laughable episode, and your chronic bad judgment is pathetic), although, as outlined below, you have so far survived the damage because Der Movement judges by criteria independent of merit. By the way, this is Johnson’s editorial comment on one of my “indecent” contributions to Counter-Currents:

The following essay is one of the most important pieces published at Counter-Currents so far. I heartily endorse its analysis and invite discussion.

A more likely reality is that Johnson was upset that I didn’t blindly defend him, re: Hermansson, and that I stayed neutral in his feuds with the Spencer-Friberg-Forney faction. If I was a lickspittle supporter like the rest, then the “indecency” and “insanity” would be no problem.

And who were the “better people” who saw it as “indecent?”  Given the relatively small number of “movement” “activists” that Johnson gets along with and of are sufficient status, this is a relatively small set of suspects. Quota Queens and grifters eager to protect themselves from honest criticism, no doubt. They'll all be analyzed here in due course. Some of their not-for-profit financials are also matters of public record.

These are the original comments by Johnson that preceded the libel above.

Ho, ho!

Counter-Currents

@NewRightAmerica

I'd be happy to debate serious challengers on such current hot topics as nationalism vs. imperialism, #coronavirus, Zionism & the Palestinians, "racist liberalism," & the relevance of Trump, Marxism, Duginism, China, & Holocaust revisionism to White Identity Politics. 50/50 split

I have years of criticisms of Johnson’s positions on this blog, focusing on his hypocrisy and logical inconsistencies (and errors of judgment). All ignored.  By the way, when are you going to denounce John Morgan and Full Moon Ancestry for violating the ethnic rights of Eastern Europeans?

Ho, ho!

Counter-Currents

@NewRightAmerica

Serious = someone established with a platform, positions, and an audience

Greggy gets to define who is “serious.”  Very convenient. Limit the field to semi-retarded Alt Right Millennial droolcups best represented by this.  Positions?  Everyone has those. What’s considered a “platform?”  An “audience?”

Of course, if Johnson was really serious (no pun intended), he’d allow all “banned” folks to challenge him and his amen corner on his blog.  He can start with the “serious” people first. In addition, I’m sure Forney would love to have Johnson on his program – how about a Johnson-Forney-Friberg podcast?  Greg can call in Hermansson to balance it out.  After all, Pat has an “audience” as well.

The unfortunate thing is that, thinking about all of this, it is likely that Johnson is currently the top “leader” in the American “movement” today.  Let us consider together.

First, we can ignore the Alt Lite, who are not part of the “movement,” and we can also disregard all of the Millennial jackasses and other no account idiots with zero gravitas. Let’s consider the real players.

Spencer – has completely “shot his bolt” and is in terminal decline; he is not called “The Master of Disaster” for nothing.

Strom – he has the intellect to challenge Johnson, but has flaws:

1. Even if he is completely innocent of his past legal issues (which may well be the case), it remains a black cloud casting a negative shadow.

2. He lacks personal force; he is more of an ideologue.  He doesn’t have the “stomach” to denounce HBD and other perversions of activism.

3. He’s tied himself to the corpse of the National Alliance and the dead WN 1.0 legacy of Pierce.

Williams – is no doubt a well-meaning fellow, but who has also tied himself to the corpse of the National Alliance and the dead WN 1.0 legacy of Pierce, and it is clear that it is Strom who is the intellectual center of the group.

Duke – has had his own past legal issues, mirrors Spencer in jumping from one failed project to another - lacking solidity of character, is old and past his prime and out of the main thrust of “movement” activism, is too focused on Zionism, has a hardcore WN 1.0 legacy of fossilized dogma, and the whole Tulsi thing was an absolute embarrassment demonstrating poor judgment. I give him credit for his New Orleans Protocol idea, but unfortunately it was too forward-thinking for the retarded “movement.”

MacDonald – also has the intellect but has gone into a strange tailspin, with TOO now being focused on HBD-Nordicism, flubro and other conspiracy theories, and other nonsense. Like Strom, more of an ideologue than a leader.

Taylor – is the only real challenger to Johnson’s status. He is, however, older now and past his prime, Amren is more of just a news and opinion outlet rather than a focus of activism (conferences notwithstanding), the Jew/Asian/HBD thing is a problem, and he’s never seemed eager for the mantle of leadership.

That leaves Johnson by default, despite his serious flaws – the whole gay controversy, his feuds and fixations, his inane ideology, his prickly personality, poor judgment, decline of the quality of his blog, etc.  He somehow overcame serious issues – Pilleater, infiltrations, the Alt Right feuds, etc. - and is prospering. I chalk that up to a lack of serious competition, mendacity and hypocrisy, being good at “movement” politics despite the aforementioned flaws, and the guru-like ability to attract new sets of writers as soon as he alienates and/or feuds with the previous set (although quality is in decline). Being an “intellectual” in a “movement” that has no intellectual rigor helps, especially when coupled with ambition and a complete lack of character.

God help us all.  

Footnote:

*From race/history/evolution notes -

Silver said...

Without the Pole Irish Greek Slavs , urban whites, Jewish ascendancy could never have been acheived in America.

We should have put a chain fence on Ellis Island and kept the Oreillys and hannitys from ever arriving.

They killed America, not Jews.

I don't like to think of my kind as having killed America (or Canada or Australia etc), but if you consider the chain of "racial events" -- the cultural conflict, the miscegenation, the racial self-doubt and so on -- that it set off I think you'd have to agree the logic is hard to resist.

I wouldn't go so far as to say it could not have happened without us PIGS, since plenty of WASPs were already bending over backwards for nigs even before we arrived and if that process continued to play out it's quite possible (though less likely) the racial predicament in the early 21st century would have been much the same.

Ted Sallis used to be the guy that ran "Western Biopolitics" or whatever it was called back in the day. He went by the initials "JWH". He closed that particular blog because of Silver's harassment (although he was a bit thin-skinned himself).

He used to also post as Michael Rienzi. I wouldn't say I harassed him. His blog didn't permit comments and I rarely addressed him directly elsewhere, mostly just dropping his name as an exponent of a racialism I found highly disturbing. This annoyed him but I doubt it was the reason he closed his blog. I used to think he and Polignano were one and the same person but now I'm not so sure.

Also, as you might notice, I'm back online. Feel free to read, participate, needle, mock or ignore.

October 8, 2012 at 6:49 PM

n/a said...

"I used to think he and Polignano were one and the same person but now I'm not so sure."

I'm confident they're not the same person. Rienzi writes under pseudonyms, describes himself as a "biological scientist", and I believe has mentioned being married (to a woman). Polignano has written under his own name since he was a college student over a decade ago, describes himself as "a writer, publisher, activist, and IT Consultant based in San Francisco", and is evidently in a homosexual relationship with Greg Johnson.

May 12 2020 Odds and Ends

In all cases, emphasis added.

See this.

BACKGROUND:

Little is known about the occurrence of specific congenital malformations among offspring of mixed race-ethnicity.

METHODS:

Using data from a population-based registry, we explored the occurrence of selected malformation phenotypes in offspring to parents who were of different race-ethnicity. Data were derived from the California Birth Defects Monitoring Program, a population-based active surveillance system for collecting information on infants and fetuses with congenital malformations using multiple source ascertainment. Approximately 2.6 million live births and stillbirths occurred during 1989-2000. Information on parental race-ethnicity (non-Hispanic white, Hispanic, black, and Asian) was obtained from birth certificates and fetal death files. Malformation phenotypes studied were spina bifida, anencephaly, cleft lip, cleft palate, tetralogy of Fallot, d-transposition of great arteries, hypospadias, small intestinal atresia, preaxial polydactyly, microtia, and hypertrophic pyloric stenosis.

RESULTS:

A total of 11.2% of births were to parents of mixed race-ethnicity. Compared to births of parents who were both white, moderately increased risks (risk ratio >/= 1.7) of anencephaly, polydactyly, and microtia, and decreased risks (risk ratio </= 0.6) of hypospadias and hypertrophic pyloric stenosis were observed among births of several mixed race-ethnicity groups. For anencephaly, polydactyly, and microtia, but not other phenotypes, the risks were different depending on whether maternal versus paternal race-ethnicity was considered. Risks observed between births of a nonwhite parent and a white parent and births of parents who were both nonwhite were similar for most malformation phenotypes.

CONCLUSIONS:

Some malformation phenotypes appear to vary in their risk based on mixed racial-ethnic groupings.

The interesting thing is that altered risk for malformation is observed only when comparing interracial unions vs. White-White, not when comparing inter-racial unions with non-White-non-White. This suggests that Whites are the most specialized, with the most co-adapted gene complexes, while all of the TROPICAL non-White peoples ("Hispanic, black, and Asian") are essentially all fungible when it comes to mating (by “Hispanic” they must mean the significantly admixed as well as more or less Amerind and Negro types, not the ones more or less White). It is not clear when they say “parents who were both nonwhite” if they mean always of the same race or if could mean of different non-White races.

Then you wonder why the Far Right is anti-science and is prey to pseudoscientific nonsense such as HBD, Nordicism, anti-vaxxism, and flubro.

Which proves that you are a naive moron with piss-poor judgment.

Paging Pilleater!

More or less true.  But they are also hysterically irrational and anti-science and anti-expert.

What a despicably evil hypocrite.

…and the importance of white identity and in-group preference.

Due to the Covid-19 pandemic, I left Eastern Europe

You are not ethnically Eastern Europe, you filthy scum. How about the “in-group preference” of Eastern Europeans not to have Danish invaders in their lands, sleeping with their women?  Ethnonationalism, right?

I would not be the person I am today if it were not for my mom

So, your mother made you into a hypocritical low-life piece of filth?

In regards to women and dating, my mom simply told me to stick to my own race.

Ho, ho!  Race.  What?  Not ethnicity?  Maybe Gaslighting Greg can tell us again why ethnonationalism is so superior to pan-European racial nationalism, other than having something to do with his bizarre fixation with Richard Spencer.

Maybe at some point Mr. FMA can stop sponging off of his mother and move to Copenhagen and live in Europe amongst his own ethnic kind, leaving the Slavs in peace in their own nations.

Ethnonationalism is so wonderful and natural that none of its promoters can practice it in their own private lives.

This is WN 2.0 – see from 9:00 to 16:00.  Now explain to me why you rank-and-file fellows believe anything Greg Johnson and the rest of the WN 2.0 shills have been telling you.

And then Forney’s rant after is not much better. This is the "beauty" of Der Movement – all the sides, all the factions, ALL of it, is an utter disaster.  There is nowhere in your Old Movement for you rank-and-filers to run and hide.  When, oh when, are you going to give up on it, and decide to look at those who have been telling you, for years, that the Old Movement is beyond hope and that the sane among us need to build something new?

Hey, Greg, whose Justice Department is it?  That sincere man of genuine greatness.

Hmm…the verdict of Alt Right WN 2.0 from Occidental Dissent comments:

The Alt-Right attracted conservatives, not people who want real change, and they dragged it down into the abyss.

Such it is.

Ricky Butt-Goy Vaughn
MAY 10, 2020 AT 11:39 PM
“The Alt-Right attracted conservatives”
True. It also attracted:
– Homosexuals
– Zionists
– Snake oil salesmen
– Shysters
– Grifters
– Cam whores
– Cat boys
– Conspiratards
– Failed rappers
– Out of work porn stars
– Yellow fever fetishists
– Cross dressing perverts
– Sociopaths from 4chan
– Based black guys in MAGA hats

That’s WN 2.0.  Why do you listen to Johnson?

How is Durocher’s France doing these days?  Essentially, they’ve lost control of parts of their own territory.  

Thinly Disguised Yellow Supremacism

And other news.

Excellent Forney podcast.  Not only critiquing Der Movement but the Holy Oriental as well.

Very cognitive, very elite.

Do you think these “people” are the same as you?

Border guards of the West!

Cooking up some new viruses, eh?

Read this.

CHANG: And besides maybe live birds, what other kind of live animals might have been at this market?

SI: Oh, there is a photo being circulated since yesterday in Chinese social media, showing the catalog of one store at this market. And you can see from the catalog, they have almost 50 different kinds of species of wild animals being sold. And you can see the price as well. So it's...

CHANG: Like what kind of wild animals?

SI: For example, hedgehogs and peacocks and wild rabbits and snakes, deer; crocodiles as well. Many of these wild animals, they're not necessarily caught in the wild - right? - so they can be farmed animals. They're just exotic food that's not very commonly found.

CHANG: And why are wild animals so popular as a delicacy in China?

SI: Eating wild animal is considered a symbol of wealth because they are more rare and expensive. And wild animals is also considered more natural and, thus, nutritious, compared to farmed meat. It's a belief in traditional Chinese medicine that it can boost the immune system, you know? Of course, some people eat wild animals just because they were driven by curiosity.

CHANG: (Laughter).

SI: It's really difficult to change the mindset of, you know, eating wild animals is better than eating farmed animals. But it's a common kind of mindset in many parts of China.

A thought experiment. Listen to the entire part of Forney podcast discussing China. Watch and read all of the above.  Consider all of those swarming, virtually identical, black-haired, black-eyed, sallow-skinned, flat-faced, broad-nosed Asians screaming at each other in Mandarin or Cantonese, in those food markets, with the screams and squawks and smells, with wild animals being slaughtered and eaten, animals being eaten alive, and ask yourself – do you honestly believe that those “people” think in the same manner as you or I?  Do you honestly believe that they think, that they view the world, in the same manner as any European – no matter how degenerate or debased you may think any of those Europeans may be?  Are they any less alien than are sub-Saharan Africans or Australian Aboriginals?

HBD is a monstrous lie. 

We can notice that the HBDers are always quick to emphasize differences among Europeans – their Hajnal obsession for example or their fetish for hunter-gatherers vs. farmers – but that they are real reticent about focusing on differences between Europeans as a whole and East Asians like the Chinese, except to tell us how the latter are so much higher-IQ and more k-selected than the former.  And the HBDers got so hysterical about the Schettino incident while completely ignoring a subsequent similar incident involving Koreans.

HBD is thinly disguised yellow supremacism.  Race realism is race treason.

And one must give Forney credit for speaking out against The Land of the Gods. Who else in Der Movement does so?  All the Alt Right Yellow Supremacists would rather accept full-scale White extinction rather than critique China or muss one black, lank Chinaman hair follicle.

Watch this - when animalistic wop criminal savagery comes face to face with New England Yankee civility.  Fiction, yes, but in some ways reflective of reality. The Reed-Johnson Act had a point, of course. The Medicists need to admit that.

Read or listen to this.  Greg Johnson: Trump is a sincere man of genuine greatness.

Zman:

One possible reason for this is that the avenues for gaining male status have been cut off by modernity. Richard Spencer cleverly played on this to attract an audience of young males on-line. His “Faustian man” stuff was an appeal to the natural desire of males to accomplish great things. Ironically, it was just an attention seeking act by someone with no accomplishments. 

“No accomplishments” – one of the prerequisites for “movement” "leadership.”

…we now live in an age in which genuine merit has no value…

A perfect description of Der Movement’s ethnic affirmative action program.  Genuine merit has no value.  Ancestry (and phenotype) is everything.

Here we go again.  The affirmative action cases need to realize that their heroine Princess Tulsi Coconut supports reparations as well.