Questions for Greggy

No answers are expected to be delivered.

See this.

Let’s start with the whole “keeping Richard Spencer’s coke dealer away from an Amren conference” thing.

First, Johnson deftly ignores the point about the homosexual cabal within Der Movement and instead concentrates on his alleged role vetting for Amren, and on Pilleater’s accusations of cocaine use at Amren conferences by the Spencer faction.

By the way, Pilleater’s accusations are either true or false. For the sake of argument, in this post I will assume that they are true (I do not know if this is really the case), but if they are false, then that was slander on the part of Pilleater, a defamation repeated in writing by Johnson.

Is Johnson really vetting people for Amren meetings? Some people claimed in livestreams/podcasts that Amren staff denied that and that Johnson has to apologize to Taylor for stating that, but I do not know if that is true.

What makes Johnson, a victim of the Hermansson and Lewis infiltrations, in any way qualified to vet for anyone about anything?

If Pilleater’s accusations were true, what does that say about Amren conferences and their vetting and about a “movement” that elevated Spencer to positions of leadership, including that of The National Policy Institute (NPI)?

If the cocaine thing is true, given that the System allegedly is hostile to Spencer, Amren, Der Movement, etc., was the whole “illegal drug use at Amren conferences” accusation ever investigated?  If yes, why no charges?  If not, why not? The whole thing seems rather strange. It reminds me of an incident I am aware of (the details of which I will not disclose) in which a past inept Grand Poobah did something wrong that was adjudicated through the legal system in some manner, but was not known to the rank-and-file at large (being a more local incident), and there can be no doubt that the watchdog groups had to know about it, and yet the watchdogs never reported it, and thus protected that “leader” from having his status diminished. It’s almost as if the System doesn’t want to eliminate incompetent Quota Queens filling the leadership niche space of pro-White activism.

Now, let’s turn to Johnson’s characterization of Pilleater’s sexual harassment complaints as “Gay guy meets other gay and flirtation occurs.”  Putting aside the question as to why flirtation of any kind, much less homosexual flirtation, is appropriate for a pro-White meeting, we can ask the following. Doesn’t Pilleater identify as bisexual rather than gay (after all, Johnson thinks it funny that Pilleater brought an Asiatrix girlfriend to a pro-White meeting)?  Didn’t Pilleater complain about actual harassment, rather than just “flirtation?” And what’s Johnson’s comment about “BelieveAllWomen” about? Is he equating bisexual man Pilleater with a woman?  And if Johnson mocks “BelieveAllWomen” why does he believe Spencer’s ex-wife (see below)?

The “LOL. Your absence will not be noted for missed” is juvenile.  Moving on:

Johnson then says “I am sure you witnessed several lifetimes worth of degeneracy at the loft in Alexandria.”

I wonder what Polignano witnessed in a San Francisco apartment, but that’s another story. If Spencer is all that Johnson believes he is then what does it say about Der Movement, Regnery, CMS, and NPI for elevating Spencer to positions of authority?  Affirmative action, anyone?

Johnson nitpicks that he “never used the phrase ‘handsome, blossoming guy.”  OK, but does he deny using the word “blossoming” to describe Pilleater’s brother?  Does he understand why some people would think it strange that a middle-aged man would describe a younger man as “blossoming?”

Johnson then talks about a “psychopath who beat his wife during both of her pregnancies,” which, given the context of the comment, is certainly about Spencer. Johnson then says he believes Nina – BelieveAllWomen?

If Johnson believes this, then please tell us - what qualifications Spencer had to be made the head of NPI?

Johnson then mocks people concerned about “poor Pilleater” (what about “poor Nina?”), who are, he avers, actually interested in smearing poor Greg. But if there is nothing wrong in the Pilleater recording, re: Johnson, then how could he be smeared by it?  What is false about the recording? Johnson then asks if a “Forney livestream” is “the appropriate forum” for people to deal with Pilleater’s complaints. Very well.  What should they do instead?  Perhaps support Pilleater filing a legal complaint about being sexually harassed?  Would that be an appropriate forum?

Some may respond to this by asserting that this focus on people (and events) rather than ideas is indicative of “low thinking.” But, alas, in the end, this is about ideas: That Der Movement is a disaster because of failed leadership (and their poor judgment) and because of the low quality of its personnel, and this is tied to Der Movement’s ethnic affirmative action policy. As Nietzsche said, people can be used as lenses through which ideas can be focused upon.