May 12 2020 Odds and Ends

In all cases, emphasis added.

See this.

BACKGROUND:

Little is known about the occurrence of specific congenital malformations among offspring of mixed race-ethnicity.

METHODS:

Using data from a population-based registry, we explored the occurrence of selected malformation phenotypes in offspring to parents who were of different race-ethnicity. Data were derived from the California Birth Defects Monitoring Program, a population-based active surveillance system for collecting information on infants and fetuses with congenital malformations using multiple source ascertainment. Approximately 2.6 million live births and stillbirths occurred during 1989-2000. Information on parental race-ethnicity (non-Hispanic white, Hispanic, black, and Asian) was obtained from birth certificates and fetal death files. Malformation phenotypes studied were spina bifida, anencephaly, cleft lip, cleft palate, tetralogy of Fallot, d-transposition of great arteries, hypospadias, small intestinal atresia, preaxial polydactyly, microtia, and hypertrophic pyloric stenosis.

RESULTS:

A total of 11.2% of births were to parents of mixed race-ethnicity. Compared to births of parents who were both white, moderately increased risks (risk ratio >/= 1.7) of anencephaly, polydactyly, and microtia, and decreased risks (risk ratio </= 0.6) of hypospadias and hypertrophic pyloric stenosis were observed among births of several mixed race-ethnicity groups. For anencephaly, polydactyly, and microtia, but not other phenotypes, the risks were different depending on whether maternal versus paternal race-ethnicity was considered. Risks observed between births of a nonwhite parent and a white parent and births of parents who were both nonwhite were similar for most malformation phenotypes.

CONCLUSIONS:

Some malformation phenotypes appear to vary in their risk based on mixed racial-ethnic groupings.

The interesting thing is that altered risk for malformation is observed only when comparing interracial unions vs. White-White, not when comparing inter-racial unions with non-White-non-White. This suggests that Whites are the most specialized, with the most co-adapted gene complexes, while all of the TROPICAL non-White peoples ("Hispanic, black, and Asian") are essentially all fungible when it comes to mating (by “Hispanic” they must mean the significantly admixed as well as more or less Amerind and Negro types, not the ones more or less White). It is not clear when they say “parents who were both nonwhite” if they mean always of the same race or if could mean of different non-White races.

Then you wonder why the Far Right is anti-science and is prey to pseudoscientific nonsense such as HBD, Nordicism, anti-vaxxism, and flubro.

Which proves that you are a naive moron with piss-poor judgment.

Paging Pilleater!

More or less true.  But they are also hysterically irrational and anti-science and anti-expert.

What a despicably evil hypocrite.

…and the importance of white identity and in-group preference.

Due to the Covid-19 pandemic, I left Eastern Europe

You are not ethnically Eastern Europe, you filthy scum. How about the “in-group preference” of Eastern Europeans not to have Danish invaders in their lands, sleeping with their women?  Ethnonationalism, right?

I would not be the person I am today if it were not for my mom

So, your mother made you into a hypocritical low-life piece of filth?

In regards to women and dating, my mom simply told me to stick to my own race.

Ho, ho!  Race.  What?  Not ethnicity?  Maybe Gaslighting Greg can tell us again why ethnonationalism is so superior to pan-European racial nationalism, other than having something to do with his bizarre fixation with Richard Spencer.

Maybe at some point Mr. FMA can stop sponging off of his mother and move to Copenhagen and live in Europe amongst his own ethnic kind, leaving the Slavs in peace in their own nations.

Ethnonationalism is so wonderful and natural that none of its promoters can practice it in their own private lives.

This is WN 2.0 – see from 9:00 to 16:00.  Now explain to me why you rank-and-file fellows believe anything Greg Johnson and the rest of the WN 2.0 shills have been telling you.

And then Forney’s rant after is not much better. This is the "beauty" of Der Movement – all the sides, all the factions, ALL of it, is an utter disaster.  There is nowhere in your Old Movement for you rank-and-filers to run and hide.  When, oh when, are you going to give up on it, and decide to look at those who have been telling you, for years, that the Old Movement is beyond hope and that the sane among us need to build something new?

Hey, Greg, whose Justice Department is it?  That sincere man of genuine greatness.

Hmm…the verdict of Alt Right WN 2.0 from Occidental Dissent comments:

The Alt-Right attracted conservatives, not people who want real change, and they dragged it down into the abyss.

Such it is.

Ricky Butt-Goy Vaughn
MAY 10, 2020 AT 11:39 PM
“The Alt-Right attracted conservatives”
True. It also attracted:
– Homosexuals
– Zionists
– Snake oil salesmen
– Shysters
– Grifters
– Cam whores
– Cat boys
– Conspiratards
– Failed rappers
– Out of work porn stars
– Yellow fever fetishists
– Cross dressing perverts
– Sociopaths from 4chan
– Based black guys in MAGA hats

That’s WN 2.0.  Why do you listen to Johnson?

How is Durocher’s France doing these days?  Essentially, they’ve lost control of parts of their own territory.