Odds and Ends, 10/30/22

In der news.

A Gab correspondent gives us the following interesting phenotypic comparison:

Emperor Hirohito.

Heinrich Himmler.

It seems Himmler fits in well with Bromstad and Bjork.  Grab dem chopsticks!

See this. Well, the one positive from all of that is that maybe, just maybe, this latest massive humiliation, after all of the others (Rotherham apparently was not enough), is enough to make Britons lose their arrogant "the wogs begin at Calais" attitude toward the rest of Europe, stop thinking that they are still on top of the world, stop the idea that they still have an empire and the dead hag was "Queen of the World," and they will finally start having a bit of humility and work with other Europeans to build a New European Order.

Or...we'll just have more Anglomanic Anachronisms like Andrew Fraser behaving as if it was the year 1890.

The UK now has King Tampon, Prince Peggster, Prince Old Driller, Gunga Din as Prime Minister, and Paki Din as mayor of London, while in the USA, WASPs are junior partners to the Jews, Australia is becoming a colony of China, Canada is a frozen dystopia, and New Zealand is ruled by SJW hysterics - and people still take the likes of Andrew Fraser seriously.

From FOX:

notsopolite

The fun fact is that UK now is an Indian colony. How ironic is it?

It is not the fault of micks, wops, or hunkies that the UK is now ruled by Gunga Din. The British did it to themselves.

Rule Britannia!

Some European nations had a temporary pre-eminence for several centuries and now they (and their overseas Diaspora) do not want to believe it is over. That's why they promote HBD-Nordicism so as to suggest that their temporary pre-eminence is a sign of innate permanent superiority. The reality is that today's Britain is in an analogous condition as post-Roman Italy under the Ostrogoths and Lombards.

Eraserhead is a classic of pro-MGTOW propaganda. Lynch likely did not intend it to be so, but in retrospect it is.

How small town High Trusters treat Italian-Americans - see here. How they treat non-Whites:

But Mr. Jetton, who is Korean American, noted that forward-looking Republicans in many places were competing for minority voters. 

Mr. LeTulle used to lead the county party’s outreach to minority voters, courting culturally conservative Asian American business owners and professionals. He said he often visited the local Hindu temple in his cowboy hat and boots with a kurta over his Wranglers. And he cited some success, like persuading a Black Democrat who had lost her primary to switch parties.

Mr. Nehls called immigrants an asset to the community.

“If you go to the Sugar Land memorial hospital and try to read the names of the doctors, we can’t pronounce them or spell them, right?” the congressman said in an interview at his book signing.

“But those are the same guys who are going to be putting in my stent in a few years!” he continued, trying to sound out the name of his own cardiologist from a business card. “I think he is from Pakistan, and I think he is a Muslim,” Mr. Nehls said, “and I love him!”

Racial Proximity Theory marches on. Yes, there are some High Trusters who don’t like non-Whites, as indicated in the article, but given the Burr Ridge example, no doubt they would be much more hostile to White ethnics.

A Gab correspondent alerts me to this. Sailer is despicable. Note he uses the Left's term of "White supremacy." What about White nationalism? I don't care if Disraeli is "fabulous" or supreme or whatever. I don't want him as my leader and I don't want to live in the same polity.

There's a reason I call Sailer "Breezy Steve" - he has to rate as the most damnably superficial commentator on Der Right. I challenge Sailer to name one well-known, prominent "White supremacist" who denies the cognitive capabilities of Jews as well as that of elite Asian immigrant stock.  Sailer is disgustingly mendacious - in other words, a HBDer.

See this argument here.  OK, fair enough. But...remember this?

For blacks in the United States to make their presence felt on the state and national stages, they need one thing more than anything else: space. They need to completely dominate entire cities, or portions of or precincts of cities, in order to be able to elect their own as representatives. These people then go to the state capital or to Washington, DC to represent them, as well as to push whitey around as best they can. Blacks come to do this not by fighting crime or reducing unemployment, but by doing as little as possible to stop their own misbehavior in their own neighborhoods. That way, non-blacks stay away. Nobody wants to live with them, and as a result, blacks have spaces to call their own. They may not be very nice spaces, but that doesn’t matter when they are tallying votes in the House of Representatives, does it?”

Something VERY strange is going on with Amren and Counter-Currents. I'm not sure yet what it is, but eventually all these things come out, whatever they are, whether it is just plain plagiarism, people writing under different names at both forums, some other sort of deep communication, or is possible that these types are such dogmatic conformists that such perfectly overlapping theses are actually independent coincidences?

If MacDonald his right, then his favorite ethnoracial groups are unsuitable for leadership in pro-White politics, because of their innate high-trusting, individualistic, pathological altruism that results in groveling to non-Whites. If MacDonald is wrong, and Sallis is right, then those same ethnoracial groups are still unsuitable for leadership in pro-White politics because of Racial Proximity Theory that results in their groveling to non-Whites. If both are wrong, it still doesn't matter, because whatever the explanation, those groups are prone to grovel to non-Whites and therefore are unsuitable for leadership in pro-White politics. So, in all circumstances, the High Trusters are unsuitable for leadership in pro-White politics.

We are told that High Truster societies would be orderly, productive, safe, and well-run if only there weren't all of those Colored migrants and their posterity around to ruin it all. OK, fair enough. But what if the presence of all of those Colored migrants and their posterity is an innate part of High Trustism? What if the wonderfully high trust cognitive suite that creates those orderly societies also makes the native majority crave the presence of Coloreds and makes them crave to debase themselves before those Coloreds? What if "diversity" is a feature and not a bug of High Trustism? That is in fact one area of agreement between the MacDonald and Sallis views - that High Trusters will inevitably grovel to Color. MacDonald says that it is from high trust altruistic individualism and Sallis says it is from Racial Proximity Theory, but the end result is the same. In a world of rapid international travel of movement of peoples, there will inevitably be Color with High Trusters. And because of the recent historical preeminence of High Trusters and their political domination of the "West" that means that Color will infiltrate into the South and East of Europe as well, as it is doing. High Trusters not only wreck their own societies with Color, but force others to do the same.

Long time readers may wonder why I now mock Brexit when I originally supported it. That's because how it turned out. Brexit would have been worth it if the UK had stopped all Colored immigration and had moved to the Right on issues like law and order and free speech. But, no. Instead they did the opposite, flooding the country with more Coloreds and being more hysterically "woke." That strongly suggests that the real motivation for Brexit was Racial Proximity Theory all along, and not a principled opposition to globalism and mass immigration as I so naively believed at the time.

See this. Typical Johnson. First, note that he only engages with and debates mediocre midwits. Second, as outlined here he has in fact endorsed Europeans waging war against each other and engaging in ethnic cleansing. Thus, he's a hypocrite pretending he's against such in his latest screed. Third, ethnonationalism is such a potent force that some of its adherents can't even practice it in their own lives, colonizing other people's countries, and that includes past and present Counter-Currents writers.

I can give my take on the war and can be brief. While I have sympathy for the Ukrainian people's struggle for independence, and their rightful distrust of Russia, I see both sides as wrong. The war is between Trad Vlad's Hapa Eurasianism vs. Ukrainian nationalists being hoodwinked yet again (as in 2014) to serve Jewish-Globalist interests. The war is a catastrophe for everyone and needs to be settled via diplomacy. My opinion of Trad Vlad is well known, but I just can't wrap my head around Ukrainians having a Jew President after what was done to them in the Holodomor. Russia has legitimate grievances and was ill-treated by the West after the collapse of the Soviet Union. On the other hand, Eastern Europeans, including and especially Ukrainians, have strong reasons to want to be outside the Russian orbit. Russia should have been allowed to join NATO 30 years ago. Russia should be looking to the East and South for their real enemies, not West.

I got some bad news for Der Retard Right who believe that a possible Supreme Court decision, re: affirmative action (in school admissions, focused on Asians, because who cares about Whites?) will actually change anything. The schools (and other pro-quota entities) will just do a work around (as they've been doing even now to get around restrictions on using race-only). Ever hear of "holistic review?" All you got to do is destress, or eliminate, objective academic metrics, and instead stress "life experiences" and "a commitment to DEI" and you can fill your class up with ignorant apes. Problem solved.

Read the comments to this utterly moronic Counter-Currents article (yes I know that description is redundant). A few isolated glimmers of sanity in a sea of Dunphy-Stronza madness. The WN 3.0 mantra:

• Downward mobility is good. Let Jews and Asians dominate the professions. Counter-Currents can still get its D'Nations of course - why save for retirement? Everyone over 40 should just die anyway.
• The enemy of Whites under 40 are Whites over 40 (no doubt older White ethnics are the worst). Generational Solidarity! Youngsters like Neil and Lipton are your allies against the White gerontocracy!
• We need to live at a 14th century standard of medical care. If you die of an "Infectious" (scare quotes - viruses don't exist) disease that means you are weak and deserve to die.

Der Movement is BY FAR the greatest enemy of Whites in existence because Der Movement will utterly repulse the types of normal, sane, and rational Whites required to actually achieve pro-White goals.

Of course, if your real goal is to be a grifter living off the D'Nations of followers because you've realized you threw away your life and career and you have no other options, then I suppose being a "movement" "leader" among such unfettered madness makes sense. You might even be a middle-aged person who knows better, and you will still let your blog descend into a whirlpool of insanity as long as the moolah keeps rolling in.

Proof positive that Dunphy is full of shit - Mophead is an old White guy whose second wife is a much younger woman (what Jeelvy would term "mate poaching") and who has received hundreds of thousands of dollars/year in "executive compensation" from supporters for "running an Internet publication" (you know, more or less what I do for nothing). Greggy Tincup is in his early 50s, while Sammy Flanders and Kevin MacTruster are old enough to be Tincup's father, all three dominating Der Movement. And yet the cowardly little worm turd Dunphy has no criticism for any of that, no siree, but instead focuses his ire on regular older White folk who have worked hard for decades and now have a little bit of savings to show for it. What a hypocritical pathetic piece of shit this Dunphy is.

By the way, Dunphy will always be White but will one day be old (that is, if he unfortunately lives that long). I suppose that realization has not yet occurred to the single neuron bouncing around his skull that he mistakenly calls a "brain."

Superiority Must Be Earned

Another Type I pathology.

If you read Coogan’s Dreamer of the Day, you will find that some Type I activists of the immediate post-WWII period attacked Yockey – a man whose valise they were not fit to carry – in deeply personal and even racial (*) terms. These people, particularly one German described as living in a filthy hovel with his children torpidly lying in bed in the middle of the day, apparently had a Negro-like sense of inflated self-esteem, most likely derived from a Guntherite conception of themselves as being racially blessed at birth by an innate aura if superiority.

I’ve said this before, but, it seems, based on typical ongoing “movement” antics, it needs to be said again: Superiority is not something an individual has as a birthright, it is something that needs to be earned.  And by “earned” I mean earned by individual accomplishment and a clearly manifested actualization of achievement.

Certainly, one can compare groups and observe that some groups are, by various standards, superior or inferior to other groups by whatever criteria are being considered. Even more fundamentally, any individual’s interests in their group’s survival and well-bring are intrinsic and not dependent on any perceptions of superiority or inferiority; genetic interests are not dependent on rankings of phenotypic attributes.

Further, stating that claims of individual superiority must be based on individual accomplishment is not some sort of anti-collectivist hyper-individualism; this attitude is wholly compatible with an individual prizing collective interests over that of the individual. But the fundamental point remains: If this issue is one of claims of the superiority of a particular individual, then the claims must be based on the characteristics, achievements, and accomplishments of that individual, not any sort of automatic birthright bestowed by the mere fact of that individual belonging to a particular ethny.

The sooner all the Type I activists in Der Movement understand that, the better.

* Available genealogical evidence suggests that Yockey was of Northwest/Northcentral European ancestry. However, since he had a “darker” “paleo-Atlantid” appearance, he was subjected to racial jibes from the early day Beavis-and-Butthead peanut gallery. The spectacle of a man like Yockey having to defend his ancestry and physical appearance is a clear demonstration of how the utter pathological stupidity of Der Movement hasn’t changed one iota in the intervening ~70 years.  It was the same back then as it is today.

The Same Old Story

The herrenvolk!

I have previously mentioned several times the habit of people like Duke and Spencer of continuously jumping from one failed project to another. But this post is about a more general problem than just those two individuals, and it is about a specific subset of the overall issue of constant, endless "movement" failure under affirmative action herrenvolk "leadership."

The specific subset of problems I refer to is the ongoing scenario in which various prominent "movement" figures are unable to successfully complete any particular project as (more or less) originally planned. All configurations of ineptness are observed. Projects may be pushed through but fail miserably - these are the failures that are most conspicuous to the general rank-and-file. But what the rank-and-file may not be aware of are the endless series of aborted projects. Ideas are conceived - some of them promising - and then are abandoned before beginning or, worse, abandoned after people (like me) have already invested time and energy in working on the project, producing initially promising results. Sometimes the projects are completely abandoned, sometimes the story is that the project is switched from one idea to another, with the new idea usually being less promising, less ambitious, less useful, and/or less feasible than the original. This secondary project typically fails and/or is abandoned as well.

Now, sometimes this is necessary and justified. After all, you do not want to reinforce error, throw bad money after good, and sometimes, yes, you have to accept a sunk cost and move on. But I am not talking about isolated cases of failure or isolated cases of abandoning certain projects or switching from one project to another. I instead am talking about an endlessly repeating series of the same sorts of errors and abandoned, failed projects. I am talking about having people like me wasting time again and again, sincerely working hard, with enthusiasm, on varied projects, only to have Quota Queens "pulling the plug" on the project, typically because they are not suitable for carrying it through, they are inept, they are unimaginative dullards who can't follow through on ideas thought up by others, they are impatient fools with apparent attention deficit defects, and they are the ones with faulty ideas and faulty "leadership." This wasting of time and energy because of the failed "leadership" of others has happened to me, and others, so many times that it is a constant disappointment, and, as alluded to above, the rank-and file only see the tip of the iceberg of failure; they typically do not know of all of these other failures and abandoned projects. 

And all of these people, the failed "leaders," cannot take any criticism, they become hysterical about any justified criticism of their ongoing ineptitude, and they are of course protected by Der Movement's ethnic affirmative action program.

Related to this, a Counter-Currents comment:

Francis XB

Posted November 11, 2020 at 3:11 pm | Permalink

Regardless of what happens between now and 20 January 2021, the Dissident Right needs an organized movement, an apparatus.

The dilemma for too many people on the Right during 2016-20 was an over-reliance on Donald Trump. But there was a lack of an effective organization which could mobilize:

* Legal defense

* Fund raising

* Pro-White info ops

* Counters against de-platforming

* Fronts for students, workers, etcetera

* Getting people out into the streets and into the boardrooms

Of course, all this means money, lawyers, specialists, media, alt-tech and (most importantly) a well known personality who could provide access to all of these things.

Is there a personality who fits this bill? Say, a billionaire who is fired up by being deprived of a public office to which he was rightfully elected? Who might be willing to provide a startup grant of several million dollars and perhaps some office space?

Even if the election is tossed to Team Deep State, the long game must be played here. It behooves the Dissident Right to maintain the impetus for Trump.

Apparatus 2021!

So, why wasn't the "Apparatus" built up during the Trump interregnum of 2017-2021?  Do we just blithely accept the incredible abrogation of duty, the complete lack of responsibility, the zero accountability, and the pitiful shocking ineptitude of the affirmative action Quota Queens?

Why don't the rank-and-file demand answers?

But, no.  Send in more "D'Nations."  After all, why not enjoy such wonderful victories such as that pictured here?

Odds and Ends, 10/21/20

In der news.

Do the flubro retards have anything to say about this?  Those hardy Swedish Vikings will be wearing “face diapers” real soon, I suppose.

Der Movement weeps.  Maximal corruption in Rome was at the times that the city was, relatively speaking, genetically “more northern and western.” Of course, the dishonest “movement” has been saying the opposite for endless decades.

Basically, everything Der Movement tells you is a lie.

The face of Dorian Johnson.

Donald Trump – yet another affirmative action Herrenvolk incompetent. More affirmative action Quota Queen Trumpian incompetence.

Read this.

There are also, I believe, additional, yet related, reasons for the Jewish contempt for beauty. I think that Jews also oppose Western standards of beauty because Jews themselves are an unattractive and, on average, ugly people whose facial features are typically ill-proportioned, unrefined, and, in a word, harsh. Ugly people always resent beautiful people, a psychological trait that emerges early on in human development and would surely be confirmed by a simple survey of, say, 13-year-old girls. So, we’re back with the idea of ressentiment: I am arguing that one reason Jews have such hatred for Western standards of beauty is that they themselves do not meet those standards and, as we know, Jews will want to destroy any hierarchy that does not place Jews at the top.

What is interesting to note is that Jews have a unique disproportion between their high intelligence and their unattractive facial features. This is a fact that sets them apart from every other human group. For all other groups there is a direct, nearly exact, proportionality between group intelligence and the average level of facial feature refinement. Europeans have, on average, the most refined facial features of any human group and they have produced the highest level of civilization and culture attained by any human group. Black Africans, who have produced virtually no civilizational or cultural accomplishments, have the least refined, indeed, most simian, features of any human group.

Of related interest.

Typical rightist anti-science and anti-intellectual attitudes. Then we wonder why it is difficult for the Right to attract STEM people and other academics.

There is much good in the Creativity religion – and religion and the constitutional protections for religion may be useful for pro-White advocates going forward – but this is nonsense.

XII. We do not believe in the use of any “medicines,” drugs, or chemicals as having any healing or therapeutic value. In fact, all medicines, drugs, narcotics and chemicals are poisonous and toxic to the human body. Furthermore, and for the same reason, we do not believe in the use of vitamin, mineral, or enzyme supplements, nor the use of artificial food coloring, preservatives, nor refined or fragmented foods.

XIII. We strongly believe in the practice of fasting as the best means of ridding the body of accumulated poisons and toxins. We are convinced that fasting is the most natural and effective means the body has of overcoming all forms of disease, and restoring itself back to health.

Look, even as far back as the Ancient Greek physicians, it was known that the usefulness of drugs depends on dose – the same drug that at a low dose that may have benefit at a high dose may be a poisonous toxin.  But you can say the same about water – drinking too much water can be toxic and fatal…and then there’s food.

I suppose you just fast though and not eat at all…

See this.

The usual suspects like to compare the “tolerance of homosexuality” in the “Mediterranean world” with the "heterosexual masculinity" found among the Celto-Germanics of Northwest Europe. Let’s see…excerpts, emphasis added:

Several Icelandic heroes were also known to engage in transgender and bisexual behavior such as Helgi Hundingsbana, who in one saga disguises himself as a maiden; and Grettir the Strong, who is described having intercourse with nearly everyone in town including the farmer’s sons, deans, courtiers and abbots.

Male prostitution was reportedly prevalent in early Scandinavia with the fixed price set very low, and several small gold foil plaques, known as goldgubbers, have been found depicting same-sex couples locked in embrace, both male and female.

In the brutal world of Viking warfare, defeated enemies were often homosexually raped or castrated as a gesture of humiliation.  

Diodorus Siculus, a Roman historian of the first century B.C., documented one of the earliest known references to homosexuality among the Celtic tribes of Britannia and northern Gaul.  In a historical account describing early Roman contact with Celtic tribes in the fourth century B.C., Diodorus wrote: “Despite the fact that their wives were beautiful, the Celts abandon themselves to a passion for other men.  They usually sleep on the ground on skins of wild animals and tumble about with a bedfellow on either side.  Paradoxically, they do not regard this as a disgrace; rather, whenever their freely-offered gift of sexual gratification is not received favorably, they regard it as a dishonor.”

One of the earliest examples of an English homosexual is King Edward II, who ruled the nation from 1307-1327…Edward then developed a relationship with Hugh Despenser… 

There’s much more there, but that’s enough.

Handbags at Dawn

And other news.

Johnson is getting upset!  Handbags at dawn! The pink purses are flying!  

Note the question about “affirmative action” – with Johnson saying that I am a “disgruntled embittered former writer” – “paranoid” – “obnoxious" - "paranoid nasty piece of crap.” The vulgar ad hominem is found in the comments ranging from around 1:28:15-1:30:25, including the question about affirmative action (the exact boundaries of the clip varies slightly whether you listen online or download it).

First reaction – laughter (not like this) and satisfaction that someone (assuming it was not a ringer) took the opportunity to use the livestream format to force Johnson to address certain issues (but it would have been better to bring up some of the other issues discussed here, such as his ethnonationalist hypocrisy, his changing dogmatic 2020 election predictions, his constant bad judgment, the Polignano incident as relayed by Friberg, his refusal to debate critics, etc.).

Second reaction – sharing that clip with associates, who also reacted with hilarity.

Third reaction – I, naturally, will respond to the main point of the comments. Thus, let’s forget Johnson’s hysteria and tackle the question of affirmative action. Johnson argues against that he’s an affirmative action case by citing that he got his initial “movement” editing job since he has a PhD (as if he’s the only person in racial activism with a PhD or some other post-graduate degree), that he founded Counter-Currents and did the work (let’s forget Friberg’s and Forney’s accusations, re: Polignano), etc. (as if other people haven’t done the same sort of work).

But I never claimed that Johnson had no credentials or never accomplished anything.  That’s a strawman argument – typical Johnsonian gaslighting argumentation. Look, when a less qualified Black is admitted to college, that doesn’t mean they never took the SAT. An unqualified Black hired at a university will still have a PhD. An unqualified Black promoted at a business will have some minimal qualifications. That’s not the point. The point is whether the person has been elevated above and beyond their qualifications, whether they have been given additional promotion over more qualified people based on demographics and not merit.

Johnson very quickly was given a top position in the “movement” (e.g.,TOQ) while others with equal credentials were not. Johnson was immediately accepted as a “movement” “mover and shaker” while others were rejected solely on the basis of (perceived or known) ethnicity. Johnson’s myriad flaws, errors, hypocrisies, bad behaviors, disasters, feuds, misrepresentations, and asinine “arguments” are overlooked by his sycophantic supporters, while others are not given the same “wiggle room” for their errors.

I realize that the “movement” is so bereft of any quality that even someone as defective as Johnson stands out as “impressive” and “educated” and “articulate” by comparison, but still…Johnson’s level of attainment in the “movement” is out of all proportion to his actual abilities and accomplishments.  Especially if you balance the books and weigh all of his disasters against his accomplishments, then it just doesn’t add up. Compared to others, there isn’t justification for Johnson’s status - based purely on merit.

Here is a thought experiment – imagine everything about Johnson is exactly the same except that he’s some American White ethnic Italian named Vito Woperino or a Balkan Slav named Boratislav Hunknic or a Greek named Graecalus Greggilos – do you really believe he would have the same status in the “movement” that he has now? That he would have been given the same opportunities? Have had all his disasters overlooked? Been so easily accepted as a “movement” bigwig?  Come on now, be serious.

Johnson’s enemy Spencer is another perfect example of an affirmative action case.  On the other hand, there are other extant “movement” leaders who – while I do often criticize them and it is true that their ancestries do in fact help them greatly – cannot be truly said to be affirmative action cases.  Jared Taylor has obviously earned his status in the “movement” by starting the entire American Renaissance enterprise from scratch (besides his initial book on race); Kevin MacDonald has obviously earned his status through his Jewish trilogy, his various forms of activism, and for speaking out as a university professor (albeit one with the protection of tenure); Kevin Strom’s status certainly has more to do with his intellectual abilities and decades of activism than with his Norwegian ancestry; and Will Williams also has had a decades-long career in pro-White activism and his military record deserves respect. So, yes, I have differences with those gentlemen and they may well resent my criticism and yes, as stated, their ancestries have benefitted them to an extent, but those individuals have real accomplishments in the “movement” - unlike the WN 2.0 nitwits who have been propped up by some of those elder statesmen and who have careened from one disaster to another.

Presumably the individual who asked the question to Johnson is someone who reads EGI Notes.  So, the answer to your question, in my opinion, is YES, Johnson is an affirmative action case.  Note well that Johnson refuses to debate critics and that he, unlike me, has a financial interest in protecting his “movement” status.

I have to laugh at Johnson pointing the finger at anyone else as being bitter and paranoid, given his feuds with people like Spencer and Friberg, and I have to laugh at him accusing others of exhibiting abnormal behavior, given (a) the Pilleater tape, and (b) Friberg’s accusations that have not been denied or refuted.

Listen to this. Of particular interest with respect to the issue of character and the promotion of ethnoimperialism are the following clips:

59:40-1:01:00

1:08:50-1:10:20

1:11:00-1:13:30

If those accusations are false, then I invite Johnson to publicly refute them; optimally, he should engage with Friberg on a podcast or livestream to discuss these issues.

Assuming for a moment Friberg is correct, then what do we see? Keep Europe atomized, fragmented, and confused so as to allow “racial aristocrats” free reign to do what they wish in their “feudal properties?”  A form of droit du seigneur that can be homosexual as well as heterosexual?  Indeed, in response to this, we can all be disgusted by other types of people as well.

Indeed, Johnson is such a wonderful person that he ends up feuding and becoming bitter enemies with, or at least falling out with, many people he had previously had cordial relations and/or worked with. Of course, there’s Sallis. What happened with Polignano? We’ve already mentioned Spencer and Friberg.  Then there’s Colin Liddell.  And Matt Forney.  What about Pilleater? Johnson has had an on-again-and-off-again association with Hunter Wallace. First he hated Dickson, now they’re buddies again. I read somewhere that Gariepy is upset with him; I don’t know if that is true. I’m sure there’s others. Then there are others he's feuded with, people that he may not have had previous cordial relations with, people like Andrew Joyce (*).

Some may respond - hey, Sallis, you’ve had “falling outs” with people too.  Correct – but, hey, according to Johnson, that’s because I’m some sort of really unpleasant, nasty, and paranoid person - so what does it say about Johnson that his feuds have been a lot more prominent than mine?  Can we describe him the same?  Or does he argue that his constant feuds and falling outs were all justified – all “the other people’s fault?”  Very convenient, eh?  Sort of like Jews blaming all the other peoples of the Earth for the fact that the Jews have been despised and “persecuted” in every nation that they’ve lived in. And remember - I’m no “movement leader” after all, just some guy blogging. I'm just a crazed loon, gibbering in my madness. What’s Johnson’s excuse?

Getting back to the livestream, of course Dickson promotes the work of the execrable scum Humphrey Ireland (“Wilmot Robertson”).  And Stoddard and Grant. Surprise!  Der Movement has nothing to offer White ethnics. As far as books that Dickson values - nothing from Salter; nothing from Yockey.  On Genetic Interests?  Not important, it seems, to Dickson.  Imperium?  Obviously not important as well. But Ireland's mumbling about Italian-American "needle workers" (obviously all five feet tall or less), and his fear that the dastardly John Marchi was tainting Anglo-conservatism, by golly, that's important!

Are we surprised that Der Movement has been a complete failure for decades? A memorable experience for Johnson – meeting Humphrey and getting his book signed.  That does tell you all you need to know about the HBD-Nordicist-Ethnonationalist alliance.  Funny though how Johnson – right out of the gate – was meeting with people like Dickson and Ireland.  No doubt if Johnson had been a five foot tall afrowop, old Humphrey would have welcomed him with open arms. Right?  Now, don’t be paranoid and believe otherwise!

Then again, given how quickly Hermansson was given “the keys to the kingdom” (and to who knows what else, eh?), the rapid acceptance of Johnson can come as no surprise – and both incidents reinforce the affirmative action narrative.

“Shoestring budgets” – right…having someone compensated for $180,000 in a year for running a website is indicative of “shoestring budgets.”  Laughable.

Dickson’s arguments that the best people in the “movement” have the most to lose and therefore do not get involved in leadership positions, leaving the worst elements to come to the fore - that's correct. Johnson on the other hand pushes the absolute absurd falsehood that activists today are of a higher quality than in the past and are more normal. I’ve been involved in racial activism longer than Johnson and I vehemently disagree with that assessment. Johnson himself is an example of the problem people extant in the “movement” today - a problem that is greater than any time in the past; look at Spencer; look at the whole Alt Right; look at the Pilleater Chronicles. I can tell you that the "movement" has never been worse off than today with respect to quality - unless of course you believe this here represents quality.

Taylor and Hood.  That was a decent podcast.  Taylor’s “libertarian leanings” – no surprise there.  Libertarianism is a curse upon the "movement." I also enjoy how they re-write history to make believe they never thought Trump was the second coming.  But those are minor issues, 99% of the podcast was excellent and on point.

A useful post.  Obviously, the woman inherited her appearance from her maternal line – good old Herrenvolk mixing it up with the Negro.  And then it is blamed on the wops.  Incredible.

Blame the vulgar retard.

A hilarious coincidence.  The universe does indeed work in mysterious ways. Wait, there’s more. How many Greg Johnson clones are there out there?

Counter-Currents comments on Bill Clinton.

Kolya Krassotkin 

Posted September 8, 2020 at 1:50 pm | Permalink

When Bill Clinton and his wife first slithered onto the national stage almost 30 years ago now, we should have known our republic’s days were numbered.

Reply

Alex

Posted September 8, 2020 at 5:07 pm | Permalink

Exactly correct, I was barely 20 at that time but I knew the country was done after Clinton was elected. During that campaign I donated to Pat Buchanan which was my first and last political campaign contribution.

Counter-Currents essay on Bill Clinton.  Apparently, the commentators there are wiser than the "writers."

* Of interest:

It was argued that homosexuals “possessed an inordinate amount of psychopathology and character flaws such as instability, illegal conduct, dishonesty, untrustworthiness, poor teamwork, and relationship forming skills. Gay men were described as being highly strung and neurotic.” Combining an understanding of homosexual personality traits with homosexual apologetics produced within White Nationalism, it becomes clear that dishonesty (“homosexuality is beside the point, let’s not discuss it”) and manipulative behaviors (“hostility to homosexuality is Jewish”), and an exaggerated sense of self-esteem/importance are at least primary concerns to those wanting to steer the cause of Whites in the right direction...The fact that an ostensibly nationalist writer can openly praise a pederastic author who denigrated the reproductive relationships of normal, healthy families is a sign of a degenerative rot that has developed in the corners of this movement.

The Wages of Affirmative Action

In Der Movement.  In all cases, emphasis added.

Read this important essay.

How to finish such a pessimistic essay? It’s true that the information presented here is disturbing, infuriating, confusing, and heartbreaking. Can any practical lessons be derived from it?

One clear pattern observed in this essay is the overwhelming reliance on “think tanks” and similar bureaucratic vehicles for the intrusion of harmful Jewish influence into our “democracy.” Jews, even with their very significant financial power, rely on the magnification of their rhetoric, interests, and grievances through such bodies in order to accomplish their goals. This is where they can and should be challenged. Who is granting access and power to these groups? Can existing legislation be used to prevent the intrusion of these bodies into the democratic process and, if not, can new legislation be proposed to do so? The closest the dissident right ever came to a think tank was the National Policy Institute (NPI), which despite its name, and while fulfilling an important movement function, didn’t really produce any policies. 

Considering who has been running the show there, are you surprised? How much failure and uselessness will you rank-and-file types tolerate before you reject the affirmative action policy?

At the present time, our movement clearly needs talented legal minds…

Unfortunately, we have none.  Worse, I see no strategy for acquiring any.  Even worse than that, apart from Joyce and I, there seems to be no one else on the Far Right who believes that this should be a priority.  Building a legal support infrastructure is in fact priority number one - not "metapolitics" or "Kali Yuga" or chugging gallons of milk while screaming "Kek!"

…and institutions…

Ditto.

…to unpack existing legislation, and develop new legislative proposals that, even if not explicitly racial, can seriously hinder the movement of harmful Jewish groups through the political body of the West. There is a serious lack of infrastructure of even the most basic kind, and we simply aren’t going to make any progress until this problem is addressed.

I agree.  Readers of EGI Notes know that I have been harping for years about the need to build infrastructure, and have been advocating an overall strategy in which infrastructure building is one of the three main legs  of the activist tripod  (besides the over-used and over-emphasized “metapolitics” leg and the completely withered electoral politics leg).  Indeed, I’ve stated, ever since November 2016, that the four years of Trump should have been used to quietly build an infrastructure behind the scenes.  But, no.  Instead we got screeching lunatics, Beavis-and-Butthead podcasts, street brawls, Unite the Right, retarded Nutzis chugging gallons of milk as a “racial statement,” Pepe and Kek, nitwits in shorts and their “extreme vetting” of “are you Swedish?,” moronic feuds, homosexual harassment, poor judgment, defeat after defeat after defeat - FOR GODSSAKES WHEN ARE YOU GOING TO HOLD THE QUOTA QUEENS ACCOUNTABLE FOR THEIR ENDLESS FAILURE?

The second lesson from this survey of developments is that social media is likely to become an increasingly compromised and dangerous place for activists. In Europe, new laws are probably a few years away, but the broader plan will almost certainly eventually envelop Canada, Australia, and, despite apparent belief that the Constitution is invulnerable, even the United States. Already American legal scholars have developed arguments for curtailing the First Amendment in the case of “hate speech” (see, e.g., Jeremy Waldron, The Harm in Hate Speech (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2012), and it is widely believed that a liberal Supreme Court majority would adopt such reasoning. The clock is probably already ticking on internet anonymity, and the example of Germany indicates that direct police involvement in “speech crime” is on the horizon. 

But one reason this is all happening is the utter uselessness of the Right. They got their “God Emperor” elected, they get millions of dollars in “D’Nations,” they have followers, they have their NPI, they’ve had DECADES of opportunity – with people like me crying in the wilderness for sane activity and infrastructure building – all wasted. All wasted by affirmative action cases and shameless grifters. The situation that exists today didn’t “just happen.”  The Right LET IT HAPPEN.

Off-line activist methodologies should be increasingly explored. 

Another thing I’ve been saying for years.  The Internet, and the over-reliance on digital activism, has been a double-edged sword.  Unfortunately, the WN 2.0 Quota Queens have wrecked every analog IRL activity they’ve touched.  WN 1.0 was much better.  Essentially we need new people involved, with more sense and better judgment.

Failing that, radically alternative modes of using internet networking should be considered. For example, even if someone uses a completely outrageous Twitter handle, complete with comic book avatar, most people still have their entire lives online (job, home town, friends, likes, hobbies, vacations). Don’t forget who ultimately has all of this information, and the organizations that will increasingly be able to access it.

How to do it?

It’s becoming very apparent that social media is itself a form of social control. 

I don’t use Twitter or Facebook.  Notice that?

We now have the ability to identify someone in a crowd simply by cross-referencing a photo of their face with available internet information. In seconds they can be identified, their employer can be contacted, and their loved ones can be harassed. In a strange way, despite the atomized condition of postmodernity, we have social control levels approaching those of the middle ages. We have new forms of social shaming, and new forms of the public pillory. Dissident activists who face overwhelming costs if they are doxxed would be well-advised to reduce their internet presence to the bare minimum, in effect, deliberately fading themselves into obscurity, thus making their life harder for the Zionist-Globalist panopticon to search for and penetrate. Remember who you were before you became an employee number, a Facebook profile, or a Twitter handle, and protect that person like you’d protect your child or other loved ones.

And how?

Andrew Joyce can do us all a service by emphasizing more in the future on practical things activists can do to navigate the situation we find ourselves in. Essays about Jewish power and the dangers we face are, of course, important, but they are also a dime-a-dozen and, in the absence of real actionable approaches, induce despair and inaction, despite whatever brief “inspiring” quotes are added as a coda. We need actionable strategies and we need infrastructure building. Whoever does that will deserve the hundreds of thousands of dollars per year that are currently being flushed down the grifter toilet.

Consider this.

First:

Some in the Dissident Right think the way to overcome these moral communities is to encourage whites to exhibit stronger ethnic identities just like blacks and other minorities. But this message would go against the central thesis of MacDonald’s book, which is that white individualism has a genetic basis.

And then, second:

MacDonald’s answer is that whites do have an implicit inclination to favor their own race, to be ethnocentric…MacDonald anticipates that as whites become aware of their “impending minority status” this will trigger white ethnocentrism.

That’s from the same essay, separated by several paragraphs. Then you wonder why I can’t take any of these guys seriously.

And again, if these HBD-Nordicists really believed their own work, then why don’t they at least support the idea of “modestly collectivist” Southern and Eastern Europeans having some positions of leadership in pro-White activism, instead of the rigidly stringent ethnic affirmative action program for Anglo-Germanics that currently exists?

Virtually all possible answers to that question would not reflect well on Der Movement, would it?

A sincere man of genuine greatness.

More sincerity and more genuine greatness.

Gee – who was it in 2016 who told you that Trump was a fraud and a buffoon?  Think real hard now.

While this is in essence a good idea, how would the “movement” implement it in practice?  Put Patrik Hermansson in charge?

Remember – you reward a sterling record of consistent success by giving yet even more money!   "D’NATIONS!"

All of this - everything - in this post demonstrates the wages of affirmative action in Der Movement.

WE ARE NEVER GOING TO MAKE ANY PROGRESS AS LONG AS THE AFFIRMATIVE ACTION POLICY EXISTS.

Odds and Ends, 5/30/20

In der news.

More Hoodian nonsense.

We could be conquering the frontiers of space, medicine, culture, and technology

Oh yes, with a “movement” that tells us that viruses don’t cause disease, that vaccines are “poisonous” “jabs” that will implant chips into us, that all non-human animal life on Earth is soon to be exterminated by “bullets flying everywhere,” that believes HBD lies, that tells us we should be “snug in our hobbit hole in the forest”…these are the heroes leading us to conquer ‘the frontiers of space, medicine, culture, and technology.”  Yogi Bear (Kali Yuga)!  The Men Who Can’t Tell Time!  The Age of Aluminum!

You mendacious idiot.

Remember the Sallis challenge?

So, I issue a challenge to the likes of Johnson, Spencer, Taylor, McCulloch et al. How about penning a post telling us two things:

1. What significant and concrete accomplishments toward society-wide White racial awakening have your efforts accomplished, and, similarly, what are the accomplishments toward that end achieved by other “activists” who share your ideological vision and overall approach?

2. Going forward, how do you expect continued efforts of your type to achieve your ethnostate/racial preservationist goals?  And for this, please don’t give vague platitudes or hand-waving about “metapolitics,” but instead a realistic and comprehensive appraisal for your optimism and your adherence to your specific approach.  And, while you are at it, please explain why your approach is superior to alternatives.

I’ll give your essay a fair hearing here, and will dissect and critique it (as I’ve been critiquing the “movement” in general here) – unlike your own (dare we say cowardly) ignoring of the critiques of your approach heretofore published here at EGI Notes (never mind your pathetic “banning” of critics from your own blogs).

Please contrast that to Johnson’s cowardly evasion of debate, and the general cordon sanitaire around the Sallis Groupuscule established by current “movement leaders.”  Of course, ultimately, the challenge is for the rank-and-file, who need to hold those “leaders” accountable for both their endless failure as well for the evasion of challenges such as that above.

Behold the female.  Zero agency.

Colored is as colored does.

“Asian Americans, including Chinese Americans like myself, benefit from affirmative action,” Sally Chen, a graduating Asian American Harvard student who participated in the brief, told NBC Asian America.

Derbyshire weeps.  The Tropical Alliance revealed in all its sordidness.

Though Blum placed Asian Americans at the center of his suit, Niyati Shah, the director of litigation at the civil rights nonprofit Asian Americans Advancing Justice – AAJC who worked on the brief, pointed out that the racial group largely supports affirmative action. Data from 2016 shows that roughly two-thirds of Asian Americans supported the policy. When white student Abigail Fisher sued the University of Texas in 2016, arguing the school shouldn’t use admissions policies that favor black and Hispanic applicants over whites and Asian Americans, more than 160 Asian American and Pacific Islander groups filed amicus briefs to support affirmative action.

Derbyshire weeps.  Asians full of enraged hatred toward Whites; Asians the pillar of the rising tide of color.

Some Asian American students said they wouldn’t even consider applying to a school that didn’t take race into account: That’s how important race can be to a college applicant’s story.”

Colored is as colored does.  Asians = A TROPICAL COLORED ANTI-WHITE PEOPLE

In a nation of over 300 million people, amusing coincidences like this will not be as rare as people may believe.

Der Right marches on – Brazil edition.

The International Right, in all its irrational science-denying “glory,” is being completely discredited.  This is why we need a REAL NEW RIGHT, one based on empiricism and rationality, not sweaty fetishism, traditionalism, market-worship, and empty bluster.

According to Greg Johnson, Donald Trump is a sincere man of genuine greatness.

Sincerely and genuinely great, I say!

Many of President Trump’s 2016 supporters have been driven offline, their brands and audiences destroyed. Others are so angry with the president’s weakness that they will not back him again…It’s sad that our highest hope for President Trump at this point is that he will simply restore the free speech rights we had before he took office.

President Trump’s Executive Order on Preventing Online Censorship shows some promise, but several legal experts called it “bluster,” “rhetoric,” and something that is not a “blueprint for anything that is going to happen.”…President Trump may mean well, but he’s not going to save us.

I thought Trump was “the last hope for White America?”

Hey, these are just the “voices of WN 3.0!” Right Greg?

Why some ethnonationalists hook up with HBD?  They can’t defend their own race?

Asian solidarity with the Negro.  Who cares about Whitey husband?   John D. take note (when you stop weeping).

A Method to the "Madness"

A message they do not like to hear.

Every once in a while, I like to step back and explain to the readers of this blog the underlying reason I often engage in ridicule of Der Movement and of “movement leadership,” why I continuously focus on the Trump fiasco and the “movement’s” lickspittle pro-Trumpism, why I continuously critique the “movement’s” affirmative action policy, and why I always point out the error and hypocrisy of the quota queen “leadership.”

Is it because I’m “crazy and bitter?”  "Insane" - as libelous defamers claim?  No. Just like stirring the pot for no reason?  No.  Am just, as the Alt Righters would say, a “black piller?’’ No.

Now, I’ve been involved in “this thing of ours” for more than twenty years; actually by now a full quarter-century.

Contrary to the breathless accounts of the Alt Right, and contrary to self-interested “movement leaders” who inflate their “successes” to both boost their fragile egos and to boost their bank accounts by encouraging tin cup handouts, I’ve seen very little progress (if at all) in this time-frame. The “movement” is on a treadmill, going nowhere fast, squandering opportunity after opportunity, wasting precious time, and, worst of all, making the exact same mistakes over and over and over again: the Man on White Horse Syndrome, the selfish feuding between “movement leaders,” the cross-accusations of who is a “Jew” or a “CIA asset,” meanwhile allowing real destructive infiltrations to take place, the lack of any strategic vision or plan whatsoever, the lack of any quality control leading to taking in absolute defective dregs, the same fossilized dogmas regurgitated again and again…I can go on, but you get the picture.

If White interests are, ultimately tied to the success or failure of racial activism, then the abovementioned state of affairs must end, or Whites as a race will end. The “movement” has such a momentum of failure, the faults are such an inherent part of its character (“baked in” one can say), that I have stated, and continue to state, that the Old Movement has to go, and be replaced by a New Movement. But whether we ultimately must get a New Movement, or have radical reform of the Old, the bottom-line is the same: the Old Movement must be subjected to a relentless barrage of critique and ridicule, underlying its flaws and identifying those responsible. “Business as usual” will be the end of racial activism as an end to Whites themselves.

So, a major mission of this blog is to shine a disinfecting light on the stupidities of Der Movement, Inc. and its inept affirmative action “leadership.”  There must be identification of problems and there must be accountability for failed “leadership.”  And, when appropriate, solutions must be given.  But those solutions will never be considered if the problems are not acknowledged, and those responsible for those problems will never truly acknowledge them because that means they’ll eventually be held accountable for their responsibility in creating the problems and/or allowing those problems to fester for years or even decades.

Will rubbing the noses of Der Movement activists in the inanities and betrayals of Trump prevent another Man on White Horse fiasco?  Maybe, maybe not – but one must try.  When this blog holds the quota queens accountable for their piss-poor performance, are any of the rank-and-file listening?  Likely only very few, but a few are better than none. One does what one can.  

If you do not hold failure accountable, all you will get is more failure. How many more wasted years and decades are you willing to accept?

Of course, the ones who are criticized do not appreciate it.  Of course they object.  After all, these criticisms have the potential of undermining their status in the "movement" and, perhaps more important from their perspective, threatens the flow of supporter donations. We certainly can't have that!  Indeed, based on self-declared fund-raising "victories" as well as publicly available databases, we observe that some of these Quota Queens are doing very well indeed. I can think of one of them who is in the top 7% of wage earners in America!  They tend to cluster in expensive coastal blue state locales (while extolling the wonders of red state flyover country to their supporters) and tend to have lifestyles beyond that of many of their supporters.  Of course they don't want to hear criticism; of course they don't want that gravy train threatened.  They'll even stoop to engaging in legally actionable defamation in order to discredit their critics.  Accountability?  They don't need no stinkin' accountability!  Why, responsibility and accountability are for lesser mortals, for all you suckers out there sending in your hard-earned shekels.

All of you rank-and-file activists out there cannot say you haven't been warned. The thing is that all you need to do at this point is just this...nothing.  Don't support the Quota Queens. Don't send them money.  Don't write for them, don't leave comments at their blogs, don't defend them.  Can you do nothing?  Do you have enough sense and self-control for that?

HBD Solution to Coronavirus: Blame the American White Man

Are all you Nutzis out there finally going to admit that I’ve been right about HBD all along?

Go, Tucker, Go!  One of his best.  What does it say about Der Movement that Tucker Carlson speaks the truth about China that the Quota Queens refuse to do?  HBDers: Time to attack Tuck!

This is HBD:

Realist 

The great Coronavirus scare is a tool the US is using to further discredit China. The US establishment will do anything to destroy China's growth and threat to the US hegemony. Tucker Carlson has hopped on the bad mouth China train...in conjunction with a marked decrease in attacking the US establishment. It appears Fox has put the thumb on him.

That’s from the self-declared Yellow Supremacist website American Renaissance. The battle lines are drawn folks.  We have HBD-race realism-Yellow Supremacy on one side and you have White nationalism on the other.

Your choice. 

This is HBD:

Hubert Cumberdale  Realist

Isn't it such a coincidence it was (literally) centered on the dead center of China's most populous and economically significant southeastern quarter of the country?

Realist  Hubert Cumberdale 

As duplicitous as the US has become, both at home and abroad...it is quite possible the US planted the virus in China.

Hubert Cumberdale  Realist 

That's what I am starting to believe more and more everyday. Make some virus that has a less than 1% mortality rate even for East Asians who are the most susceptible to it (so the creators don't feel "too" bad about what they've done) and yet have it cause such economic and social devastation.

HBD is the enemy. Ted Sallis has BEEN PROVEN ABSOLUTELY CORRECT ONCE AGAIN.  HBD is an anti-White hate cult.  HBDers literally worship at The Altar of Asia.  We see Chinese behaving worse than sub-Saharan Africans, but it is all the White man’s fault, don’t you know.

HBD is race treason.

“Race realism” is race treason.

White Yellow Supremacists are race traitors.

When are HBDers such as "Realist" going to be forced to register as foreign agents?  Aren’t they in essence working for the Chinese government?  When is the US federal government going to look into this?

Some sanity:

Asmodeous Rex  Realist 

Did they plant SARS there too? Did they plant Avian flu there too? Did they plant the Bubonic plague which killed half of Europe during the Middle Ages also? All those diseases came from China.

Response:

Realist  Asmodeous Rex 

Did they plant SARS there too?

Did they plant Avian flu there too?

Also quite possible

That’s HBD.  Remember Orwell: If you want a vision of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face - forever.  The boot belongs to a flat-chested, buck-toothed, grotesquely ugly, estrogen-deficient Chinatrix and the face belongs to an awkward squad omega male HBDer.  That’s the HBD future for humanity.

By the way, Mr. Rex, you forgot about influenza as well - including the so-called "Spanish" flu.

Sallis predicted the emergence of a HBD-ethnonationalist-Nordicist alliance, promoting Asian (and Jewish) interests, attacking White interests, and centered on sites like Unz, Amren, Counter-Currents, etc.

Right, right, I’m always right. Oh, yes, that's "the paranoid style." Very "paranoid" to note that the HBDers not only refuse to blame their Chinese gods for a crisis created by the Chinese "people," but they actually have the crazed temerity to blame (White) Americans for it.  You know, White folks - the ones who have been MURDERED by Chinese diseases for centuries. White folks - who are sending huge amounts of supplies to China while the Chinese whine that they are "not being helped enough" and while the monsters fume that non-monsters who protect themselves from disease are "racist."

What's interesting is that the HBDers are so fanatically pro-Chinese that they take positions that are more extreme than that of the Chinese government itself.  The HBDers claim that the "coronavirus scare" is a "tool" to impair China's rise, while the Chinese themselves declare it a "grave crisis" and a "people's struggle."  The HBDers insanely then claim that the virus (no longer a "scare," I suppose) is a dastardly American bioweapon aimed at the blushing, shy, and innocent Chinese; the Chinese themselves are desperate to invoke a "natural origin" for the virus so as to deflect attention from their own bioweapons facility at the epicenter of the crisis.

The behavior of HBDers here is so lunatic that if I had predicted such behavior - say a month ago - I would have been labelled "crazy and bitter" and engaging in "the paranoid style" by the Unzian traitors.  But, alas, the HBDers are so many cans short of a sixpack that they engage in stupidity that even I did not predict.  

At some point,the HBDers may realize they are damaging themselves and try a different tack - perhaps deflect attention from China by foaming at the mouth about "inner vs. outer hajnal" or "high trust hunter gatherers" or something of that nature.  Attacking afrowops and Romanians is always in the HBD toolkit.

On the other hand, if we start seeing the Chinese authorities start talking about "the coronavirus scare is a  tool to impair China's rise," or about the virus as an American bioweapon, then we'll have more evidence of close cooperation between the Chinese government and HBD agents infiltrated in the West.

Asia is a curse on humanity.

Of course it’s chaotic.  Colored is as colored does.

Behold two turds.

Dear Turds:

You may be asymptomatic carriers. Why not just endure that quarantine with that famed stoic British “stiff upper lip” rather than whine to be released as two typhoid marys spreading disease to others? I don’t know – maybe “anxiety and neurosis” is not confined to afrowops?  By the way, if you “smell a rat,” it’s probably being eaten (alive) by some Chinamen somewhere.

That’s all America’s fault, right?  How dare we interfere with “China’s rise” by preventing the Chinese from spying, stealing, copyright infringement, smuggling biological material, etc.  How dare we!

Colored is as colored does. If Negroes or wops behaved like this, the HBDers would be screaming bloody murder.  Chinese do it – they’re the victims.

Behold the female.  Manjaw?  Check.  Problem glasses? Check. SJW cat lady scowl? Check.

Blame dem dere Ellis Island White ethnics – like Kevin MacDonald and Francis Parker Yockey, right?

What a stupid bastard this Hampton is. 

Many white ethnics still harbor resentment over alleged WASP oppression and can’t get over that America demanded their ancestors speak English.

Uh huh.  And who does he name?  Various Jews.  Yockey,  Spengler.  Benoist.  I don’t seem to recall Scalia bashing the Puritans.  Really, what an obsessive dumbfuck this guy is.  If he really thinks wops and hunkes are darkly muttering about “America demanded their ancestors speak English” then I think he is, literally, insane.

These guys always talk about “White ethnic resentment” and attacks against WASPs, but the only ones on the attack in this dynamic are the WASPs against the White ethnics.  The WASP cries out in pain as he strikes you.  

The only ones criticizing Puritans are Jews, HBDers, foreigners, and wanna-be foreigners like Yockey – none of whom are American “White ethnics.”

Let’s see some nonsense from a commentator:

I remembering getting into the anti-Purtian [sic] mindset after reading about it from Hunter Wallace, who is a Southern Nationalist, and Kevin MacDonald, who is an Irish Catholic. Those two have an outsized influence in the Pro-White Movement, especially Dr. MacDonald.

The “Southern Nationalist” “Wallace” is a WASP.  Are afrowops to blame for “Albion’s seed” feuds?  MacDonald may be Catholic (or raised as such), but he’s not Irish, dumbfuck  He’s Scottish-German. You know, a Celto-Germanic high trust inner hajnal northern hunter gatherer.

Still waiting for some of dem dere “Ellis Island” “White ethnics” (not Jews).  

Once again: The WASP cries out in pain as he strikes you.

Hampton is the ethnic aggressor here.  If he has a problem with anti-Puritanism, address high trust northern hunter gatherers like “Wallace” and MacDonald. Neolithic farmer swarthoids are not involved in that feud and have no interest in in, other than to call out retarded fetishists like Hampton who project their ethnic animus on others who have nothing to do with the issue.

Sailer is right about this.