Zero Immigration Solution

Accept the demographic consequences.

We all know that the System’s demographic-economic justification for genocidal mass immigration to Western (majority White) nations is the idea is that Western nations have below-replacement birthrates, with declining, aging populations, and so these nations need immigrants from other nations – predominantly Third World/Global South peoples with higher birthrates – to make up the demographic shortfall (the case of the USA will be discussed near the end of this essay, below). Nationalists from Western nations object to this, and rightly so, since that process will inexorably result in the biological and cultural replacement of the native population by aliens, which is, essentially, a form of slow-motion genocide.

My solution to the demographic problem is the exact opposite of what the System is proposing and doing. My solution is to stop enabling nations and populations engaging in reckless demographic behavior, said enabling manifested by allowing Western nations to avoid the consequences of their selfish hedonism and allowing the Colored nations to avoid the consequences of endless population growth and poor management of their own nations, via the safety valve of transferring their excess population to the West.

Thus, I advocate zero immigration – absolute zero. Force the Western nations to face the consequences of their demographic choices – the shrinking and aging population, worker shortages, shrinking economies, problems in funding social welfare including caring for the aged, etc. Force the Colored nations to face the consequences of overpopulation, youth unemployment, restless young men, mismanaged governments and economies. Using the Colored excess to fill in the demographic gaps in the West, and so create a safety valve for Colored overpopulation and unemployment, is a short-term solution, one that enables bad behavior on both sides, makes both sides addicted to ad hoc immigration faux-solutions, and does not solve the inherent fundamental problems in both societies. And, as stated, for the West and Western populations, the problem is existential, for, if the process continues, it ultimately means the end of the West. It will result in the replacement of the West with new Colored nations, which will, in the end, exhibit the same problems as their original homelands. Thus, the West dies and the Third World remains as dysfunctional as ever, albeit with new territories for the ever-expanding Colored populations.

Instead, the West needs to find endogenous, internal solutions to its demographic crisis. Years, likely decades, of pain will ensue, with the consequences of the shrinking and aging population and all that means. Too bad. That pain will force radical solutions so as to adapt to the new reality, possibly including accepting negative economic “growth,” downscaled expectations, less social welfare, people working long and harder, extensive use of automation, and, yes, INCREASED NATIVE BIRTHRATES. Yes, the latter will take decades to “kick in,” so the period of adjustment will last a long time. But this, however painful, will be a long-term and sustainable solution, one that allows for the survival of the West and of Western peoples (particularly if combined with repatriation of aliens already present in Western nations, which does need to occur as well).  On the other side of the equation, if the Global South no longer has the safety valve of shipping their excess population to the West, they will need to take radical measures for population control and endogenous, native solutions to their political, social, and economic problems. That will entail pain as well.  But it is a long-term and sustainable solution.

Unfortunately, I do not see the political will on either side of the divide for this, unless and until it is forced upon them (and the only way I see this happening is either a Far Right political renaissance throughout the West and/or some sort of global economic collapse or other crisis). As both sides are addicted to the short-term “solution” of Third World to West population transfer, neither side, as currently constituted, will voluntarily stop the process.

But my solution is the only real solution.  Humanity needs to go “cold turkey” with respect to mass immigration.

Now, America (and some other nations) is a somewhat different case, as the overall birthrates are still higher than in Europe, although racial differences within America means that low birthrate Whites are in numerical decline. And there is evidence that overall birthrates are declining.  So, regardless of differences with Europe, there is still the Ponzi scheme notion that immigration (and its cheap labor) are necessary for economic growth and to sustain a population that is getting older.  But the same basic principle applies. America is addicted to mass immigration the same as is (Western) Europe and for many of the same reasons, even if some details differ. The majority White population is being race replaced as a result of low birthrates and mass immigration, etc., so everything I said above applies here, even if the politics of the situation are different (Diaspora nation that always had non-Whites and a “nation of immigrants” paradigm). We are told of the wonders of the market economy.  Very well.  Can it find solutions to demographic problems other than the replacement of original populations.

So, it is the same everywhere in the West, in majority White nations. The addiction to mass immigration must be broken.  There is much at stake.