Happy New Year 2022

2022.

Happy New Year!

I'm not going to make any New Year's Resolutions here, as my ability to achieve some of my objectives, or even to do certain specific things, is constrained, at least in part, by forces and events beyond my control.

I will say that, in 2022, I would like to sharpen my critiques and deconstruction of Der Movement, while continuing to lay the foundation for a New Movement to supplant the Old.

Other news:

Just like I predicted, and advocated, for the end of the Alt Right disaster, I now do the same for the Amnat Groypers. That retarded stupidity can't exit the activist stage quick enough.

A Gab correspondent who is a friend of this blog alerts me to this. Well, gee, Andy, that does sound familiar. I've said the same, with almost the exact phrasing - what? - maybe a hundred times already at this blog, and many times at my Gab account.  Well, since that's the Sallis refrain, I obviously agree.  I certainly don't want to be in the same "tent" with Torba.

Another Gab correspondent who is a friend of this blog alerts me to Counter-Currents O’Meara expressing himself:

James J OMeara

@JohnRivers whatsa madda you, you racist or something? Itsa mah CULTCHA, we gotta be close, be intimate. We ain't cold duck like you WASPS. Next you'll be saying we shouldna been let, like that Sen. Geary, and you know whata happa to hima.

But, hey, to say that Der Movement is hostile to wops is just "insane" nonsense from "paranoid crap." In any case, Counter-Currents supporters take note. Further, I understand that we cannot all be as sexually repressed as "cold duck" WASP Bill Clinton, a man noted for his Puritan-like personal behavior. 

The Autright blog is yet another critic of the dastardly Ted Sallis; Autright claims that I consider even mild criticism of Southern Europeans, other than my own, as Nordicism. Thus:

Now, lets talk about all the beneficial circumstances Mediterranean Europeans had that led to the development of classical civilization. Of course not, that would be "Nordicism" as Sallis has a tendency to categorize even mild criticisms or quips towards southern Europeans, unless they are his own, as "Nordicism".

No, actually, an honest appraisal of my views would be that I consider continuous severe criticism of Southern Europeans, often factually incorrect and/or misleading, in the absence of a similar level of (even factually correct and mild) criticism of Northern Europeans, to be Nordicism. On my blog, I criticize every group, when it is justified to do so; Nordicists only critique groups other than their own.  

This anti-Sallis criticism was provoked by a Gab comment I made citing an article discussing certain geographical advantages (e.g., coal deposits) that facilitated the Industrial Revolution in Britain. Autright must be a relative newcomer to Der Movement if he doesn't know that a common "movement" trope, something we've all heard for decades, is to ascribe the development of the Classical Civilization to climate and geographical advantages in the Mediterranean region. Thus, those greasy wogs had nice warm weather to create civilization and spread it around the Mediterranean basin, while Nords were shivering in the cold. The "movement'" essentially says that the accomplishments of Southern Europe were due to external factors, such as climate and geography, while the accomplishments of Northern Europe were due to the innate superiority of the people of that region. So, with respect to "lets talk about all the beneficial circumstances Mediterranean Europeans had that led to the development of classical civilization," I direct you to the last half century of "movement" discourse. Been there, done that.

The Gab post that triggered Autright's comment was primarily to mock and ridicule Der Movement's hypocrisy on the topic. To put it in Alt Right/Millennial language, it was "trolling." This ridicule is justified given "movement" hypocritical dogma (or is it dogmatic hypocrisy?). As The Hermansson Humiliation clearly demonstrated, the fundamental foundation of Der Movement is worship of Nordics (just like HBD is based on worship of Jews and Asians). That is the milieu that the "movement" operates in, which is why some people become upset when that dogma is challenged

In truth, while I believe that external factors, like geography, do influence human history to some degree, I still put innate human qualities at the forefront. The people of Britain had a number of admirable human qualities that made the Industrial Revolution possible. The coal helped, but sub-Saharan Africans could be sitting on a mountain of coal and they would just be sitting around eating each other. All of the uranium in Africa certainly hasn't resulted in nuclear reactors being developed there, did it?

But, then, if we accept all of that, then Der Movement's assertion that the accomplishments of Southern Europe were all due to a favorable climate, Mediterranean sea access, or whatever other external factor, is equally suspect. I won't even bother answering the canard that the Classical Civilization was "Nordic" - if anyone still believes that, then they are as delusional as the blank slatists.

And what's with all of the interest in inter-racial differences in masculinity? As others have suggested, the interest in these topics among WN 2.0 and WN 3.0 might be a generational thing concerning Millennials and Zoomers; I personally do not see the reason to obsess over issues of masculinity and talking constantly about "incels" and the like. Ultimately, this is the result of HBD. I don't recall WNs bringing up this subject. It was due to people like Rushton and his cherry picked "French Army Surgeon" material on penis size and all of the sweaty HBD commentaries on Negro testosterone levels and Steve Sailer's excited interest in Negro "charisma" and the like.  Nords, Meds, Slavs, whatever - your enemy is HBD.  "Race realism" is not racial science; it is a bunch of crap that openly identifies as "Yellow Supremacist" while also lauding Jews, and to buy into Rushton's r-k spectrum (that does have some validity in its broadest strokes, but gets taken too far), we have to accept the IQ-manliness trade-off, so if we say Negroes are stone-cold stupid, then they are, in compensation, big-dicked, high-t, macho supermen. I think folks should worry more about the type of poison propagated at Amren, VDARE, and elsewhere than one of my trolling Gab comments. The difference is that the HBDers aren't trolling, they're serious.