Bring on the Meds!

Let us consider together.

I first want to thank one of my Gab correspondents, a friend of this blog, for bringing this matter to my attention (and providing a transcript of Johnson's comments). Before I proceed, I need to note that I am using the term “Med” as a shorthand for “Southern European” (similar to the way I use “White” as a shorthand for “of indigenous European ancestry"); I have a long record of opposing the term “Mediterranean” in a racial sense, since Nordicists and other fetishists (as well as “Med” fools like Sergi) postulate a trans-continental “Mediterranean race” consisting of people ranging from Portugal to Bangladesh. My old essay The Mediterranean Myth (that I do not have a copy of anymore) outlined my opinions on that. Having that out of the way, let’s get to the main point.

Let’s consider Johnson’s comments here, at approximately one hour thirty minutes.

Jews are a people of passionate neuroticism. They are high intensity people. You just can't have them in a society with laid back Aryan types, especially the more Nordic and uh you know I think Jews have met their match with other people around the Mediterranean right uh you know the gesticulating Mediterranean in your face types they could pretty much argue Jews to a standstill uh its the Nordics who want to avoid unpleasantness and don’t want to talk about these things they are the ones who are just not psychologically capable of allowing these people in their societies because of the difference in psychological intensity means that these people are just going to constantly push they’re pushing and pushing and pushing their way into positions of power until they have the ability to completely debauche and destroy society and guess what we are already there. They have the keys were in the back seat... and they don’t have any breaks they don’t know how to put on the breaks, right.

Note: “...the gesticulating Mediterranean in your face types...” Really, Johnson, you elitist effeminate jackass - do we need any more evidence of your contempt for White ethnics?

So, anyway, Johnson believes that Meds may be better than Nords in resisting Jews and, thus, by implication, better in making certain pro-White arguments. That is consistent with my repeated refrain that if the HBD Nordicists really believe all they state about intra-European differences in individualism vs. collectivism, “high trust” altruism vs. ethnocentrism, Hajnal lines, etc. then they should promote recruiting White ethnics and having more of the ethnocentric Outer Hajnal Whites of Southern and Eastern European descent in prominent positions, including leadership, in pro-White activism. The same applies in a more general sense for the entire “movement” as compared to just the HBD Nordicist faction. If elements of the “movement” believe that White ethnics like Meds can be valuable, then why not make a good faith effort to recruit and retain these people?

The trouble is the “movement” does everything possible to alienate and reject (gesticulating, in your face) Meds; in fact, it almost seems that the major thrust of the “movement” is anti-Med rather than anti-Black, anti-Jew, anti-Colored etc. Indeed, comments like “...the gesticulating Mediterranean in your face types...” seem designed to alienate and disgust "Med" White ethnics. The “movement” practices a rigid form of ethnic affirmative action in which Northern Europeans, particularly Celto-Germanic Northwest Europeans (e.g., British, Germans, Scandinavians; in America, “WASPs” most of all), are elevated to leadership independent of merit while the ethnics are held back. That’s exactly the opposite of what you’d expect from a consistent application of HBD Nordicist ideas – why have leadership solely consisting of the least ethnocentric, most trusting, and most pathologically altruist "not psychologically capable" groups while shutting out racially aware ethnocentric White ethnics? 

Now, the Quota Queens may claim (whether we believe them is another issue) that they are genuinely not anti-Med and they really want all Whites in their “movement.”  If so, let us consider this comment I left at Gab:

If we assume that some of the Quota Queens sincerely believe that they are not anti-Med, then they are delusional. They simply do not seem to understand that their toxic brew of Nordicism, HBD Nordicism, ethnic fetishism, Anglocentrism, Germanocentrism, Sallis’ Law, Humphrey hagiography, HBD race realism, etc. alienates Meds. The problem is that even if they do not politically align with Nordicism, they have internalized its belief and memes. Since they believe (even if unconsciously) that Meds are inferior, they don’t, or can’t, grasp that Meds don’t see themselves as inferior and therefore will reject Der Movement for reasons that the Quota Queens don’t see. The Quota Queens, whether they admit it or not, see Meds as second-class, subaltern, borderline Whites (if White at all) and therefore do not understand why Meds react negatively to that “truth.”

If that is all so difficult to understand on their own, and they really want to recruit and retain Meds and other White ethnics, then why don’t they just ask those people what the problem is?  But, alas, I’ve been banging this drum for all of the time I’ve been an activist – both analog and digital – and you can see all the good it has done. I’m a “paranoid piece of crap” suffering from “insanity” don’t you know – which proves that the Quota Queens are not sincere in whatever statements they make about wanting Meds and other ethnics.

In summary, to the extent that Johnson believes what he said in that livestream, then his body of activity, and that of his fellow Quota Queens, has the net effect of alienating those that he believes would be of benefit to the pro-White cause, while resulting in a situation in which pro-White leadership consists solely of those least resistant to, and least capable of resisting, Jewish memetic influence. Good work!

Now, if there are people who genuinely and sincerely want to recruit and retain Meds and other White ethnics one place they can begin is to actually listen to long-time pro-White activists who belong to such groups and who have been discussing these issues for many years.  Otherwise, people are just guessing, or making assumptions, about what the problems are in their recruitment and retaining strategies. A riposte would be that the opinions of a few activists are anecdotal and non-quantitative, but in the absence of quantitative data (e.g., surveys), you need to use whatever is available.  And if what is available are the opinions of people like myself, then that is what you can and should use.  At least you’ll get some ideas to consider and to test.