Odds and Ends, 7/21/21

In der news.

Of interest.

Further, the high morale and solidarity that citizens exhibit during a disaster dissolve the individualist outlook that elites have long learned to control and maintain. The seemingly positive and prosocial solidarity response of the population is itself a threat to the mechanisms of elite power in our society. Just as disasters empower normal citizens on the ground, who have no choice but to take fate into their own hands, they leave elites feeling distant and helpless. Chess and Clarke call this state of affairs “elite panic:” a fearful distrust of the populace that prompts leaders to restrict information, over-concentrate resources, and use coercive methods to reassert authority in the face of temporary breakdowns in public order. This style of response poses an active danger to disaster survivors and, ironically, creates the very resistance to authority that leaders fear most. Nowhere is this clearer than in the history of epidemic response.

The people must be trusted with fear, and the governing class must be comfortable with leadership during times of crisis. Fear is an unpleasant emotion— but at times, a useful one. Fear lends urgency to action. Fear forces the afraid to focus on that which matters. This is the great lesson of the 2020 coronavirus: We should have been allowed to fear. Alas, our leaders feared our fear more than they feared our deaths. The world bears the consequences of this stark faith in the myth of panic.

One wonders if “elite panic” describes the reaction of “movement” leadership to activists realizing that Der Movement is a pathetic failure and feeling fear at the imminent collapse of any credible White racialist resistance?

According to the MacDonaldite hypothesis, Northwest Europeans are particularly susceptible to Jewish/Globalist manipulation because the Inner Hajnal Nords are highly individualistic, altruistic, egalitarian, etc.

But wouldn't that also make them very susceptible to manipulation by HBDers? Wouldn't that make them more gullible to various HBD-style memes (ironically enough, including the MacDonaldite hypothesis itself)?

Finally, and as stated before here, why should such easily manipulated and gullible types be allowed to monopolize leadership positions in the pro-White dissident movement?

Wouldn't you want more ethnocentric and less easily manipulated people in such positions - that is, if you REALLY believed in the reality of such stark intra-European differences in behavior?

Regnery has died. Regnery represents the tragedy of lost opportunities. A person with his money, willing to donate to the Far Right, could have been a game-changer, instead of flushing the money down the Der Movement toilet.

Not surprising he was in Florida. Anyone who has followed Der Movement with any interest has noticed the Beltway/Virginia-Georgia-Florida axis, what the Majority Rights crowd perceptively termed "The Regnery Circus" - a gaggle of fetishists, Anglocentrics, Nordicists, ethnonationalists, HBDers, grifters, traditionalists, and/or homosexuals.

Imagine if that money had gone into building a real legal defense (and offense) infrastructure, lobbying, meeting places, funding people like Salter, etc.

Der Movement has objected to the movie Caddyshack because they claim it is anti-WASP (it is) and reflects Jewish anxieties and anger over being excluded from "WASP country clubs" (it does). What Der Movement fails to mention (of course) is that the movie is also anti-Italian, perhaps because Der Movement shares the Jewish Hollywood perception of "the wops" as greasy, stupid, violent, hyper-sexed, thuggish punks.

The "good guys" of the film (apart from "spaced out" deracialized WASP "Ty" - a model for the type of Old Stock degeneracy that Jews have always promoted) are crypto-Jewish "Eastern Europeans" as well as Irish Catholics. Both Jews and the Irish gave us the 1965 Immigration Act ("good guys"), while Italian-Americans have moved to the right politically ("bad guys").

Amusingly, Humphrey Ireland was distraught about right-wing wops (the dreaded John Marchi!) - how dare "they" invade "our" conservatism!

See this.

To give his views a more public face, in 2005 he spent $380,000 to create the National Policy Institute, a think tank designed to inject white-supremacist ideas into mainstream political conversations.

But the institute languished for its first decade, even after Mr. Regnery hired the alt-right figure Richard Spencer, a charismatic former Ph.D. student, in 2011.

Rewritten for more accuracy:

But the institute languished for its first decade, especially after Mr. Regnery hired the failed alt-right figure Richard Spencer, a charismatic former Ph.D. student, in 2011.

Imagine if that $380,000 had been used to create a legal defense infrastructure.  

Once again I ask Johnson – what were Spencer’s qualifications being made the head of NPI?

Odds and Ends, 6/23/21

In der news.

Yockey in the 21st century.

This here is basically a rip-off regurgitation of my previous work at Majority Rights discussing NEC envy and hatred of Whites as well as my more recent work on racial envy at EGI Notes.

Speaking of Majority Rights. There really isn’t anything for me to answer, as GW's post is typical MR-style empty philosophical rambling, in this case aimed to disguise a personal opinion about the character of Americans – more specifically, White Americans. But, we can agree, possibly, on one thing – there likely are, generally speaking, differences of character and of broad outlook between Europeans and European-Americans. Being a practical minded example of the latter, I’ll give an example. Imagine being given a sample of GW’s writing on some topic, completely unidentified as regards authorship, and a similarly unidentified piece on the same topic by, say, William Pierce. Let us further assume that the content of each piece contains no direct clue (even spelling of certain words that differ between the UK and America) as to the identity, citizenship, or place of residence of each author.  You only know that one piece is written by a European, the other by a European-American. Would it be so difficult to properly identify each? I think not. And it is obvious why.

Now, the Europeans will defend their style and outlook by suggesting that those (“Jeffersonian”) Americans are superficially pragmatic, overly simplistic in their convictions, lacking a proper philosophical grounding, self-unaware; someone like Yockey would suggest that only someone from the “Mother Soil of a Culture” (i.e., Europe) has the deeper outlook, and someone from a “Culture Colony” (i.e., America) lacks that insight and depth. On the other hand, the American perspective would be to shake their head sadly at the pretentious empty windbaggery of enervated Europeans and their navel-gazing endless philosophizing, people agonizing over the deeper meaning of Heidegger’s “Being” while their nations are over-run by Colored hordes, people who believe that decades of nitpicking debate over esoteric subjects is required before any practical political steps to rectify the situation can be even merely discussed, much less actually organized. 

I’ll leave it up to the reader as to which approach they prefer (keeping in mind that I myself have been castigated by those more “action-oriented” for my own “theorizing” about the work of Salter and Yockey). Whether you think the term “Jeffersonian” is needlessly pejorative for a description of the more American outlook, I’ll also leave up to the reader. Amusingly, if you compare GW’s comments to me to my own reply here, you’ll see the same European vs. European-American distinction recapitulated. 

As to the points made by GW and others in the comments – I’ll also leave it up to the reader to decide whether having White America fragmented by ethnicity/subrace is a “beautiful” and “ideal” vision or not. I suppose I should be gratified that GW at least recognizes that my outlook is more practical than his own, with respect to America at least.

If GW wants to waste his time agonizing over Heidegger instead of doing useful political work, that’s his business. However, when people like him, who know little about America, misrepresent the nature of our country, then it becomes our business. 

See this. Why should anyone except for HBDers be surprised?  The high, high-IQ Chinese cause the pandemic with their incompetence and malice, and now their vaccine is proving to be relatively ineffective.  But, hey, let’s remember the grand words of Jared Taylor here:

I think Asians are objectively superior to Whites by just about any measure that you can come up with in terms of what are the ingredients for a successful society.

Amren, meet Ms. Wei Fuk Yu.  No, her name is not “Ben Dover.”

See this.  Hey! I thought that MacDonald said that Bezos will become a rightist because he is "of Nordic descent?" And didn't Roissy say that Bezos will "make a hard right turn" politically because he works out and is "jacked?"

Riposte to GW

A riposte.

 GW: 

Thorn, it seems to me that the problems confronting American WN are at least threefold, and they are fundamental.  In brief:

First, America is, and always has been, a Jeffersonian liberal project.  

More superficial “analysis” of America by Europeans. Jeffersonian ideals were only one thread in the American historical story. Men such as Washington, Hamilton, Franklin, and Burr (yes, I am non-ironically putting Hamilton and Burr in the same grouping; further, Burr’s earlier tropism toward decentralization doesn’t make him a Jeffersonian – the man tried to establish a personal empire, for godssakes) had a more “European” and more “traditional” and national view of America and its future. But it is much easier for the European right to throw around terms like “Jeffersonian liberal project” and “enlightenment ideas” and disregard undercurrents of American nationalism.

WNs simply do not understand that the liberal model of Man which they effortlessly exemplify is what they have to set aside.  

WNs exemplify – effortlessly exemplify! – a “liberal model of Man?” Examples please.

It is very similar with religious Americans who simply cannot grasp - forgive me for saying this again - that the Christian model of the soul seeking salvation lives inside the Jewish mind, and they have to get out.  They have to turn to their inherent truth ... to the authenticity of the natural identity.  

I agree about Christianity, but “the authenticity of the natural identity” seems to me to be just more empty philosophizing.

But they don’t even want to, and without the most remarkable leadership it may not even be possible anyway.

Talking about (American) WN “leadership” without mentioning the affirmative action policy is like talking about urban crime without mentioning race. Of course, I can understand where the Anglocentric GW doesn’t want to ask questions about his American co-ethnics.

Second, WN has to operate race-wide.  It’s proving hard enough to bring a single European people to political awareness in our time, but to do that across the whole of Europe, across the whole genetic distance of Europe’s peoples distributed across such a huge country, is an unimaginably difficult undertaking.

Nonsense. I talk more about this below, but you cannot label something as “an unimaginably difficult undertaking” if it has never been tried.  More to the point, in America at least, there is no real alternative. I understand that to the European Right it is always 1910 or 1920 in America, with fully disjunctive, unmixed, competing, mutually hostile, Euro-American ethnic groups, many of which are unassimilated. However, it is actually 2021, and White America is mostly composed of people of mixed European ethnic descent, and those who are unmixed are in many cases ethnically “outmarried” with mixed-ethnic children. Apart from the odd ethnic activist with a chip on their shoulder, the only Whites in America who take intra-European divisions seriously are the Nutzi freak fetishists of the “movement.” To everyone else, the idea is pitifully outdated at best, and freakishly weird at worst.

We can debate about what approach is best for Europe, but anyone who thinks that the “single European people” model applies to 2021 America is profoundly delusional. I of course promote the pan-European approach for Europe as well, which I have discussed at many forums (including and especially here at this blog), but as GW is specifically talking about American WN here, I’ll concentrate on the American situation, which, as I’ve stated many times, European activists know little to nothing about.

Third, WN is dominated by German-Americans, a significantly numerical and influential body of whom are principally concerned not to free whites from their current fate but to rescue the reputation of the Third Reich.  No progress can be made until that element is disavowed and marginalised.

I (somewhat) agree with GW here, but he doesn’t realize how this weakens his second argument. Again, one cannot say that a genuine pan-European approach (in America, at least) has failed, or is “an unimaginably difficult undertaking,” because it has never been tried.  If American WN is dominated by “German-Americans” and by others (e.g., Pierce) who are, or were, Germanocentric Nutzis, if American WN has been dominated by Germanocentric Nordicism, Hitler worship, and related memes, then how is this a “race-wide” operation?  The "movement" has always been out-of-touch with ordinary White Americans, and has never sincerely and genuinely attempted an authentic "White racial" approach.

Name me one - just one! - American 'White racialist" (sic) leader who was, or is, genuinely pan-European. Pierce was a Germanocentric Hitlerite and a Nordicist who painted a transparently false “pan-Aryan” veneer on the National Alliance to appeal to growing numbers of “racist” White ethnics.  KKK-Nutzi Duke’s racial fantasies are on display in My Awakening. Taylor is a HBD "race realist” whose Amren badmouths Italians, Hungarians, and Romanians as it praises Jews and Asians. Counter-Currents praises hyper-Nordicist “Wilmot Robertson” and tells us we need more men like Bill Clinton and Hubert Humphrey (and we know why). MacDonald has veered off into the fever swamps of HBD-Nordicism. Who?  I can continue the analysis, but the result will be the same. What GW dismisses as "unimaginably difficult" has never been tried, because the "leadership" of the "movement" have always been fixated on failed, past models of American racialism with roots in the early 20th century.

There is another problem here.  While I generally agree with the tone and meaning of GW’s third point, is isn’t really factually correct.  While it is true that most White Americans are ethnically mixed, and that some “leaders” may have Germans in their ancestry, the American “leadership” - the few "heroes" who have led us from one disaster to another - is mostly derived from GW’s beloved Anglo-Saxons: Taylor, Pierce, Johnson, Rockwell, Covington, Duke, Williams, Spencer, Roper, etc. (acknowledging that some of those may have a “kraut in the woodpile”). Who’s "German?" Gliebe? Linder? Who else? Who else is there who is or was prominent?  Klassen?  Strom is Norwegian. Carto was – what? – partly French?  Who?  If GW thinks that Yeager is some sort of serious American WN leader, he’s nuts. If anything, American WN "leadership" (and sensibilities) is WASP, not German (although individuals like Pierce fetishized Germans). 

The whole mindset of the "leadership" is decades out-of-date and it is no surprise that their approach does not resonate with the White American masses.

These are likely insuperable problems, and a change of branding, whilst it may be necessary in itself, isn’t going to even scratch the surface.  Right now white Americans are quite involuntarily testing the thesis that worse is better, as the Dem attack winds itself up.  Right now, it seems likely that worse is only worse.

GW, who, like other Europeans, has a non-existent grasp of American realities, leaves out many of the real problems of the American “movement,” which are discussed at this blog on a regular basis.

Odds and Ends, 3/7/21

In der news. In all cases, emphasis added.

See this. As usual, Sallis proven right; the Silkers at Majority Rights proven wrong.

What can one say?  Sometimes the universe mocks us all.

See this:

MARLA

Can't believe the callousness of some people. I've chosen to continue wearing a mask because I don't want to risk being an "unknown" carrier of the virus and then giving it to someone who could possibly die from it. You never know when this could happen. So for me, wearing a mask is not a burden or a violation of my rights; it's an act of love for my fellowman.

Contrast that to Ramsey, who screams like a stuck pig about “face diapers,” while at the same time telling us not to pick on the poor, persecuted yellow monsters who created this damn plague.

Ramzpaul when dealing with “face diapers” or "mRNA operating systems,” seen here.

Ramzpaul when dealing with the threat of China, seen from 1:44 to 2:05 here.

I'll say it again. Yes, the System is going a bit overboard with the mask hysteria. I'm getting tired of it. But, you know, public health measures during a pandemic doesn't seem to be the sort of "hill to die on" with respect to "fighting for freedom," with decades of restriction of freedom of association from "civil rights laws," decades of employment discrimination from "affirmative action," White slavery from racial differentials in net tax givers and takers, and the current war against free speech. Then we have folks who get hysterical about "face diapers" and "mRNA operating systems" (aka vaccines), but who are not only deadly silent about the yellow monsters who created the problem to begin with, but who are actually defending China, and pretending that China is not hopping on the "oppose White Supremacy" bandwagon. So, if I have a choice between criticizing masking hysteria or criticizing "Ben Dover" Alt Liters, I'll choose the latter every time.

See this.

…Faye was born on 7th November 1949 in Angoulème in southwest France…

Southern France? No, no, a thousand times, no!  What kind of collectivist Neolithic was Faye?  Not a northern high truster!

Some of Faye’s activities illustrate how much more deft a touch the French radical right of that time had than its British counterpart. For example, Faye quite remarkably became secretary of the Association for the Defence of Arabs working in Europe, using his position to advocate their return to their countries of origin, so as to avoid their being trapped in a form of modern slavery and deprived of their cultural roots. This approach was, to say the least, more subtle and more effective than shaven-headed oafs parading in the street in big boots and combat jackets, chanting “there ain’t no black in the Union Jack, send the n***ers back!”.

The former is Type II, the latter is Type I. Guess which type dominates Der Movement. 

It didn’t help that Alain de Benoist thought J-M Le Pen a boor and an oaf, whilst J-M Le Pen thought Alain de Benoist snobbish and effete! Each man grossly exaggerated the faults of the other and failed to see the virtues. Perhaps there is a lesson for us when we are tempted to criticise other movement people.

Yes, probably best not to call them “insane” and “paranoid piece of crap.”

…fascism, an ideology well described by one perceptive and sympathetic British commentator as the Shire of the hobbits, with spaceships!

Oh, for godssakes, what a defamation of fascism. The next frontier for population geneticists is to identify the "Tolkien gene" in Northwest European Celto-Germanic peoples. There must be something to explain that lunatic obsession.

…his transition to a pro-Zionist position, arguing for an alliance between Israel and Europe…the gradual percolation of his writings into the Anglosphere brought him close to Jared Taylor, who twice hosted Faye as a speaker at AmRen...

All a coincidence, a coincidence I say!

Gresham’s Blogging

Quality most important.

Johnson at Counter-Currents is so closely mimicking the trajectory of Guessedworker at Majority Rights that it is uncanny; indeed, the similarity is so marked I suspect that there may be an ethnic-genetic underpinning to the behavior. In both cases, we observe poor judgment, shortsightedness, a poor understanding of costs vs. benefits, a dismissal of the consequences of editorial decisions, and zero consideration of the concept of Gresham’s Law as it applies to blogging.

The Sallis Groupuscule is a single individual writing a couple of blogs, read by whomever is reading them. Counter-Currents (and Majority Rights, etc.) in contrast is a dynamic community. It is a community because it is composed of a group of writers and a readership that includes an active commentariat with a number of fairly regular commentators. It is dynamic because the pool of writers and the composition of the commentariat (and the readership as a whole) changes over time.

Thus, just like comparing the USA of 1820 with that of 2020, the illusion of superficial stability over time masks the reality of dynamic change. A blog name is stable, the same person may be in charge, and the number of posts, page views, and comments may be stable or even increase. However, the people writing the posts and the people writing the comments will change over time, for better or for worse. Typically, it is for the worse. Gresham’s Law of blogging is that bad quality people will drive out good, unless there is a concerted effort to maintain quality; indeed, if the blog owner actually enables the degeneration, the rate of decay can be very rapid. That is a decay in quality. The quantity may look the same or better, masking the decline in quality in the "minds" of the simple-minded or delusional.

These people see and celebrate an increase in page views, but they ignore that the people viewing the page views are not from the quality, informed readers that they (at least originally) ostensibly desire. They ignore that the posts are of low quality, written by childish hacks. They console themselves that, yes, some of their most valuable writers and commentators are gone, but they can always dig up some warm bodies to fill the spaces, however inadequately. They look at the number of posts and comments, but do not see the coarsening of the discourse, the displacement of the highbrow by the lowbrow.  Their blog looks like it is thriving on the surface, but it is completely decaying from within.

At some point, the decay can no longer be masked and the over-inflated growth collapses like a burst balloon. The exhausted blog become a wasteland, and the people in charge seemingly do not understand why. They don’t understand that by always going for quantity over quality, by always pumping up page views with cheap controversy, by tolerating juvenile and superficial discussion, that they are wrecking their blog’s reputation for seriousness and are alienating quality writers, readers, and commentators.

This basic principle also explains why the “movement” is full of defectives, freaks, grifters, infiltrators, retards, etc. – the emphasis on quantity over quality. The Quota Queens, completely lacking any understanding of prudent management and conservative growth, fail to comprehend that having ten completely reliable and competent people is better than having a hundred freaks, incompetents, and informers.  To the Quota Queens, more is always better – more page views, more money, more people, more, more, always more.  They constantly fail to question their “more is better" mantra. They always fail to observe that low quality people always drive out those of high quality.

Is that because they themselves are of low quality, and are in positions of leadership for reasons other than merit?

Groyper Alert!

Boomer/Gen X counterforce strike.

Let’s consider this laughable retardation in more detail. It’s too long and too boring to examine in its entirety, but a brief fisking of selected excerpts is in order, emphasis added:

I was planning to go to Charlottesville, but I couldn’t get off work the day before. I could theoretically have still gone but the logistics would have been insane. I would have had to go straight from work to the bus station and then taken a 14-hour bus ride and then gotten there sometime in the afternoon. Then I would have had to take a cab to and from the event. Eventually, I just said “Fuck that. This all sounds very complicated, annoying, and expensive. I’ll be there in spirit.”

Poor baby! Traumatized by the idea of going to Charlottesville!  Imagine if this guy had to travel to the mountaintop to see Pierce – he’d need years of intensive mental health counseling in order to recover.  Certainly, seeing all of the cross-eyed West Virginia waitresses in run-down restaurants seemingly all populated by the same tobacco-chewing flannel shirt-wearing crowd (and that's the women) would be sufficient to invoke serious nightmares, no doubt.

(I won’t tell you this kid’s name because it’s one of those newfangled white names…Anyway, this white kid from Boston had one of those names. The poor thing. It would basically be doxing him to tell you what it is, because I doubt that there are any more than 3 people in the universe who have it. 

I am always bemused by “activists” with names like “John Smith” who brag about their courageous use of “my real name.” Yeah, sure, there’s only like maybe 10,000 other “John Smiths” in America, so, yes indeed, the spotlight is intensely focused on you just like a BLM-protest laser beam. Compare that, to, say, someone with the stupendous testicular fortitude to use their real name of “Full Moon Ancestry.”  Now, that’s a more rare Danish-American name, no doubt, and Mr. Ancestry – or should I call him Full Moon? – should truly be lauded for his openness in that regard.  Indeed, isn’t Nicholas Jeelvy a rare name in Macedonia?  Kudos to the Turko-Albanian Pillsbury Dough Man. Even Jef Costello is not that common of a name – Jim Goad would agree. Then we have Greg Johnson whose own name is so rare, it’s a miracle he evaded the public eye for so long while using it.

He said he was not familiar with Counter-Currents. I asked if he knew who Greg Johnson was. He said he did, and I told him “Well, Counter-Currents is his website.” 

The intellectual bombast of Counter-Currents certainly makes a great impression on the “youth culture.”

Kid Boston told me that he started watching Nick Fuentes about a year before the Groyper Wars, but before that had been a 4chan lurker. By Groyper standards, that pretty much made him an OG.

WN 2.0!

It was pretty early by the time we got to Freedom Plaza; about 9 o’clock, and things weren’t supposed to get going until around noon. We had some time to kill. Tim said he knew DC pretty well and knew of a nifty diner where we could get breakfast. It was a short walk. On the way to the diner, a white boomer woman passed us by, smiled at Tim, and said “Oh, thank you. We need more black Republicans.” Sigh.

Yes, Sigh. If had it been a white millennial or zoomer woman instead, she would have fellated the Negro. Sigh.

COVID skepticism appears to be the default among Trump supporters.

That stampede are all the White STEMers running away form you.

The Proud Boys are certainly having a moment right now. They recently got a semi-endorsement in an internationally-televised live presidential debate followed by a much less-publicized disavowal from none other than President Trump himself. Of course, the Trump apologist will insist that his initial reaction represented Trump’s true feelings. Trump’s kneejerk reaction, his gut instinct in the spur of the moment, was to defend the Proud Boys, and his later disavowal was a pragmatic necessity done with a wink and a nod. I’m neither endorsing nor disavowing this claim. I’m just telling you what the argument is.

4D Chess!  Trust the plan! MAGA!  Pepe! Kek! Drink milk!

There are currently rumors that the Proud Boys are experiencing a crisis in leadership. Word on the street has it that Kyle Chapman, AKA Based Stickman (remember him?), is attempting to oust the Proud Boys’ current leader, the Afro-Cuban Enrique Tarrio, and intends to transform Proud Boys into an explicitly White Nationalist organization…Look, I’m the last guy to criticize any person or group for wanting to go in a more ethnonationalist direction. But the fact that Chapman is talking like a movie villain (or a typical wignat) makes my spidey-senses tingle. Best case scenario, this guy’s a LARPer. Worst case scenario, he’s a Fed. Somewhere in between those two extremes is the possibility that he was just drunk when he wrote that.

“Spidey-senses tingle.” Was the Green Goblin at the rally?  Mysterio?  Doctor Octopus?  The Vulture?

Er...isn’t Kyle Chapman that Alt Right/Alt Lite nitwit who was going to rallies dressed like Captain America and who was married to an Asiatrix?  That’s one of YOUR guys, not mine - prime Millennial-style Kekian material, no?

Using the word “negro” is one of those things that can sound either retro-cool or tryhard cringe depending on context. 

Someone who uses the term “spidey-senses” tells us what to say and write.

It’s like calling someone a “sodomite.”

Like Greg?

Now, I am a lover of all things old-timey. But in my opinion, if you are going to go old-timey, you should go full old-timey. Don’t just go old-timey with your racism. If you are going to call blacks negros, you should also refer to cat ladies as “spinsters” (“old maid” is also acceptable). Stop calling them “thots” and start calling them “floozies” (unless they are a thot for married and/or rich guys, in which case they are an “adventuress”). Go full old-timey, and then when you use the word “negro,” people will say “Well, he’s just an old-school kind of guy.”

How about the “old-timey” word “retard” to describe Trav?

Personally, I think “colored” has more retro charm.

Personally, I think you are a pretentious jackass.

Secondly, the fact that the Proud Boys are not explicitly white nationalist gives them enough plausible deniability that they can go out in public and confront Antifa in ways that we cannot. If they went full white nationalist, the establishment would start throwing these guys 30-year prison sentences for jaywalking.

I’m always happy to see people come over to the white nationalist side, but the Proud Boys do have some value as a junior varsity team.

Well, sure, if you worship someone who self-describes as “Afro-Latino” I suppose that all makes sense. 

That's not a critique of Fuentes, of whom I have no opinion, positive or negative. He self-describes as "Afro-Latino" - perhaps tongue-in-cheek based on at-home-ancestry-testing results or some such nonsense, but...whatever. For me, the likes of Fuentes and the so-called Groypers are essentially irrelevant. They're just another incoherent expression of rightist "youth culture." On the other hand, Counter-Currents is highly relevant, given that it is emerging as the central core of the anti-White multiracialist "woke" faction of the "Far Right." Thus, this essay must be analyzed, even though it is on a subject of little interest to me.

For their part, Hispanics, like all Latino people, have a soft spot for strong men. 

Let’s ask the Afro-Latinos what they think.

There have always been black Republicans for as long as I have been alive. Not only were they extreme outliers, but most of them gave off a strong Uncle Tom vibe.

Isn’t “Uncle Tom” an “old-timey” phrase?  Watch it - my “spidey-sense” is a-tinglin’!

When I encountered Lady MAGA, he was surrounded by a phalanx of faghags clamoring to have their picture take with him. I kid you not. Conservative women were utterly fascinated by this creature. The fact that someone could be both a drag queen and a Trump supporter completely blew their tiny little minds.

So much work to be done. . .

So, do you support drag queens and consider those who view drag queens as freaks as people with “tiny little minds?” Or are you merely mocking "boomer" fascination with that creature? Your confused "gonzo" writing leaves much to be desired. With respect to the drag queen itself, I suppose that’s the “West Coast White nationalism” Johnson supports.

 “I say Groypers, you say rise! Groypers!”

“Rise!”

“Groypers!”

“Rise!”

By “rise,” Groypers are talking about their penises as they lustily leer at a greasy-haired, buck-toothed, flat-chested Chinatrix.

They even managed to get some pretty long chants going, like reciting a Fuentes quote from the intro music of the show. One guy would yell “America First is inevitable! It’s unstoppable!” and the Groypers would respond: “AND THE REASON WHY IS BECAUSE IT’S NOT COOL TO SHILL FOR BIG BUSINESS! IT’S NOT COOL TO SHILL FOR ISRAEL! IT’S NOT. IT’S GAY!”

Gay?  What would The Homo and the Negro think?

The Groypers then broke out into chants of “Fuck Wignats” followed chants of “Optics” and “Fuck that, wignat” and then “fuck off, Fed” and “glowing.” At one point, the Groypers surrounded the Wignat in T-poses.

That  is, I suppose, the WN 2.0 that Johnson has been telling is so much better than the WN 1.0 variety.

When Nick Fuentes finally arrived on the scene, it was like something out of Hard Days Night. The Groypers erupted in jubilation. The kid’s a rock star. 

Rock star?  Like MacDonald?

I’ll admit that I am an unapologetic Fuentes plan-truster.

After all, the lesson from the Trump fiasco is that we should worship and blindly follow some leader, with no skepticism whatsoever. Trust the plan!

The thing about purity and why it is not very impressive is that you don’t have to do anything to be pure. Being effective requires some combination of talent, skill, hard work, and patience. 

Therefore, we should assume that Der Movement’s affirmative action Quota Queens have no "talent, skill, hard work, and patience.”

My default assumption is that all anonymous people attend gay interracial orgies (*) until I have specific reason to believe otherwise. I do not consider the burden of proof to be on me.

If someone is anonymous, I can only assume that they go about their day to day life pretending to be some kind of liberal, either classical or full-flavored. And yet I’ve been called a coward by more anonymous people than I can count (and I can count very high)…In my opinion, anonymous people should not be allowed to have an opinion on optics. Why should they? 

Thus, anonymous activists with decades of experience, including IRL analog activism, should be disregarded. In contrast, some drooling retardate who crawled out of his parents’ basement a couple of years ago to chug down gallons of milk while screaming “Kek!” should instead be carefully listened to.

No doubt, some of you are probably thinking “Well, Trav, it’s easy for you to not be anonymous. You have a cool-sounding name. You’re a white nationalist whose name literally means ‘The White.’ Who named you? Charles Dickens? The only reason I go by AryanWarrior1488 is that no one wants to hear about Khazar Theory from a guy named Melvin Snodgrass. If I had a cool sounding name like Travis LeBlanc, I’d be out there peacocking it like you do!”

That’s no excuse. Okay, so you have a silly-sounding name. Do you know who else had a silly-sounding name? Mussolini. I mean, Benito is not bad, but the name “Mussolini” is objectively silly. But Il Duce didn’t let that stop him. He went out and did badass things and now people associate the name “Mussolini” with being a badass.

That’s the sort of mature and sober analysis we can come to expect from Counter-Currents in its Majority Rights-like decline phase.

That’s because the Groypers are, to a very large extent, a cult of personality. Within the context of the Groypers, “purity” means believing whatever Nick Fuentes believes. 

That sure worked out well with the Alt Right and Trump.  Let’s hand it to Der Movement – they are admirably consistent in never learning from their mistakes.

This is one of the things that separates the Groypers from the Alt-Right of yore. I think Richard Spencer very much would have liked to have turned the old Alt-Right into his own private cult of personality, but unfortunately for Spencer, one of the requirements for starting a cult of personality is actually having a decent personality.

What would a Counter-Currents article be without an attack against Spencer?

As a relevant aside, I have to laugh at this:

According to his clerk, Goddard had the habit of ejaculating when passing a death sentence, “so that a fresh pair of trousers had to be brought to court on those occasions.”

I suppose some Alt Right Quota Queens need a fresh pair of trousers every time they or one of their sycophants insult Spencer.  Anyone in mind, Greg?

Back to LeBlanc:

Within the Groypers, it’s all based on Nick. He is the President and the Supreme Court. What he says is law. 

WN 2.0!

A boomer lady looked over at the crowd of Groypers and could tell that something interesting was happening.

Meanwhile, the millennial and zoomer ladies were screwing Negroes.

But the wild enthusiasm of the Groypers still attracted curious onlookers who continued to watch Fuentes even though they could not hear what he was saying.

The Afro-Latino personality cult is the future of WN 2.0!  Heil Pepe!

“The groyper thing is going to burn out fairly soon (don’t believe me? Let’s talk again next fall).”

— David Cole, November 26, 2019

The only thing Cole got wrong was the time table.  Give it a bit more time, Moshe.

I agree with Johnson here, but who was it who took that stupid woman seriously to begin with?  Let’s take a guess.  Bad judgment, anybody?

An excerpt from a wonderful comment left at Counter-Currents:

This, like every optics cuck proposal, went nowhere, accomplished nothing, and didn’t even manage to be aesthetically or intellectually interesting. This site, and all others like it, have become a shell of its former self. 2020 Counter-Currents is little more than 2016 Breitbart. You people abandoned every principle to make your movement solely about the Trump cult of personality, and you were incapable even of getting the man himself reelected. Enjoy shilling for Nimrata Randhawa/Tim Scott in 2024.

Yes and no. While this fellow is on the right track - Counter-Currents is firmly on the path of eventual terminal decline, following in the footsteps of Majority Rights - he doesn't quite get the reasons why.

Just like Groyperism is a Fuentes personality cult, Counter-Currents is a Greg Johnson personality cult. So, whatever ideology and memetic tropes Johnson has thrown in his lot with, then that's what all the sycophants parrot. So:

• HBD-Nordicist-ethnonationalist alliance, leading to the promotion of multiculturalism ("Rosie and the kids")
• Hatred of Richard Spencer
• Trumpism
• Anti-pan-Europeanist ethnonationalism
• Backwards traditionalism with an esoteric bent
• Promotion of homosexuality
• WN 2.0/Alt Right/big tent stupidities
• Johnson never admitting being wrong about anything, constant lies and gaslighting
• "Punching right" but having glass jaws when someone "punches right" in their direction
• Defending Der Movement's rigid ethnic affirmative action program
• Pan-handling for money; after all, "Trevor Lynch" needs to go to the movies and write reviews for the Jew Unz
• Privileging "movement" politics and the "good old boys" network over what's best for the race
• Taking on new writers not for any ideological purpose or strategic approach, but to boost page views and get more "D'Nations"

I can go on, but that's enough. What does it say about Counter-Currents when Jim Goad is the wise and prudent voice of reason on most of the comments threads?

This is HBD; this is Amren:

JohnEngelman  

With an average IQ of 115, most Jews are born superior.

I have been telling you, constantly, for years that HBD is a Jewish-Asian supremacist ideology that wants to privilege Jewish and Asian interests over that of Whites.  Amren self-describes as "yellow supremacist" and has as a commentator and blogger the likes of Engelman. Counter-Currents shills for a multiculturalism that would allow Jews to live in a White ethnostate, never mind "Rosie and the kids." That's what your Quota Queen "movement" supports.

The Arctic Alliance disproven again - Sallis is always, ALWAYS right. The existential meaning of Asians is hatred of Whites.  After all, like Jews, Asians are at the top of income, per capita net worth, educational achievement, etc., but like Jews, they "vote like Puerto Ricans."  The explanation is simple - a burning hatred of Whites. And no amount of "measured groveling" by Derbyshire to his Chinese wife can alter these facts one iota.

The retarded buffoon’s Platinum Plan sure worked out, huh?  MAGA!

Laugh at this.

This same voter thought Trump’s immigration reform implied he would give amnesty and bring in more immigrants. So much for the well-informed citizen. This same ex-Trump voter is now a strong Black Lives Matter supporter following the George Floyd riots. “That was a huge turning point for me, I think, in general of really understanding the Black Lives Matter movement and just embracing it,” she said of the demonstrations that ravaged Minneapolis.

“She” – let’s have some more pro-female “white knighting” from Counter-Currents, now, right?

And – 

The town’s younger, more cosmopolitan residents are also fueling the shift toward the left. A 26-year-old woman recalls how she was the first one to put up a Biden sign in her neighborhood and this convinced her neighbors to follow suit.

Lots of "independent thinkers" there, eh? Sounds rather...conformist and collectivist to me. And, oh, by the way, what do you think is the ethnic breakdown of the semi-retarded cuckified White voters in this town?  High trust!

The media’s election narrative will claim nationalism alienated these sensitive whites and the GOP must abandon Trumpism to win them back. That’s a strategy designed to lose the country. The 5 percenters are right in one aspect: the Right should focus on winning over more downscale whites than cucking to upscale whites. That’s the only viable strategy for a serious Right-wing movement.

Re-written for accuracy:

The media’s election narrative will claim nationalism alienated these sensitive Nordish whites and the GOP must abandon Trumpism to win them back. That’s a strategy designed to lose the country. Sallis is right in one aspect: the Right should focus on winning over more “Outer Hajnal” White ethnics than cucking to “Inner Hajnal” High Trust Whites. That’s the only viable strategy for a serious Right-wing movement.

Der movement, der movement, der movement marches on.

* Do those events involve Hermansson?

Four Observations, 7/17/20

Some observations.

1. A. James Gregor described Nordicism as an ideology of despair, since a Nordicist theme often was (is?) that everyone – including modern Northern Europeans – are mongrel degenerates, not comparable to the noble pure Nordics of the past, that “the great race” was “passing,” that all that is great and good is threatened by racial contamination from inferior peoples.

HBD-Nordicism is likewise an ideology of despair; here the theme is that Whites – at least the real, Herrenvolk Whites – are so genetically individualistic that nothing activists can do will interest those Whites in becoming adaptively ethnocentric.  The best that we can all do is sit back and hope things get so bad that the “implicit ethnocentrism” of Whites will somehow become activated (likely too late in any case).

Gee…if that’s the case, then what’s the point of giving hundreds of thousands of dollars per year to “movement” grifters?  It’s not like they can ever accomplish anything, right?

2. There are certain “movement leaders” whose current ideology – in some cases opposite of what they promoted in the past – has been adopted merely to spite other “leaders” that they are feuding with.  What happens though is that the new ideology becomes part of the “leader’s” activist identity, they become emotionally invested in it, their massive ego demands that they defend it, even against arguments they themselves would have made in the past.  Can such people ever be trusted, even in the slightest?

3. Much “movement” discourse is essentially essays and articles telling us how bad things are and how Jews and Coloreds are working for our demise.  Very well, but my basic problem with such contributions is that they are essentially midway in the continuum of analysis.  On the one hand, they never explore, ultimately, how and why things reached the current sorry state, they never explore why “our side” has endlessly failed and let the Jews and Coloreds rise to positions of power and authority over us, they never identify the individuals and organizations on our side, always sufficiently funded, who have done absolutely nothing to stem the tide –nay, who have actually helped to make things worse.  It’s just that, hey, this is how things are today, and, boy, aren’t they bad!

Then, on the other hand, these analyses rarely if ever move on from the descriptive to the prescriptive, and tell us what we need to do from this point on to effectively deal with the situation.  Again, we are just told, over and over again, how bad things are, and how they will get worse, but no word on why we are where we are or what we should do next.

It’s the same old story time and again.  At some point we can ask – how is any of this at all helpful?

4. Consider this post and the accompanying comments thread.  If you have free time, do go through the most or all of the comments.

Consider that was nine years ago.  Since then, nearly a decade has passed.  We’ve seen the rise and fall of the Alt Right, we’ve seen the election of God Emperor Trump, we've seen millions of dollars of “D’Nations” be funneled into the accounts of “movement” organizations, we’ve seen the insanity of 2020, we’ve seen the migration crisis in Europe, we’ve seen many, many things.  

Now, compare that 2011 post and comments thread to the situation today.  Any real difference?  No. Nothing getting done, endless talk, endless feuding (even with the usual suspects involved), zero progress, zero planning, zero judgment, and the “let’s air dirty laundry in public” attitude as if these posts and comments thread are only being read by – dare I say it based on the subject of the post? – an activist elite, rather than by anyone with an Internet connection (including “watchdog groups” and other “antis”).  

I’ll say one thing positive about the CMS – to the extent that they are “confidential” and are working quietly behind the scenes - that is the right approach.  They may not get anything useful done, but this spewing forth of “movement” bile – some things never change, eh?  That whole exchange could have very easily have been 2020, rather than 2011.  It’s all one.

And for laughs, here is how Greg Johnson ends one of his comments on that thread:

Lapses in judgment like this really beggar the imagination.

Any movement with leaders like this is a joke.

Readers of EGI Notes understand why I find that comically ironic and highly amusing.  Yes, Greg, lots of “lapses in judgment” that “really beggar the imagination” – and, yes, “any movement with leaders like this is a joke.”  You see, we are in complete agreement – although when I say things like that – particularly when I cite your own “lapses in judgment” and when I include you in the “leaders like this” who make the “movement” into a “joke” - then I’m “crazy and bitter” as well as “insane and indecent.”

The hypocrisy really beggars the imagination.

Defamation and Evolution

A two part post.

First, defamation:

Relevant to this, see this (emphasis added):

What is defamatory?

Defamation is all about reputation, and in particular about statements which damage others' reputations. The English courts have not settled upon a single test for determining whether a statement is defamatory. Examples of the formulations used to define a "defamatory imputation" include:

an imputation which is likely to lower a person in the estimation of right-thinking

people;

an imputation which injures a person's reputation by exposing him to hatred, contempt

or ridicule;

an imputation which tends to make a person be shunned or avoided.

A statement that a person is an adulterer, a gold-digger or a drunkard may be defamatory, as may an allegation of corruption, racism, disease, insanity or insolvency

Therefore, injuring “a person's reputation by exposing him to hatred, contempt or ridicule” by an imputation of “insanity” can be considered defamation – assuming that the person in question is not deemed clinically insane.

Also, see footnote 149 here (emphasis added):

Social Aversion. A communication may be defamatory of another although it has no tendency to affect adversely the other's personal or financial reputation. Thus the imputation of certain physical and mental attributes such as disease or insanity are defamatory because they tend to deter third persons from associating with the person so characterized.

By the way, calling someone “insane” is not the same as calling them “fucking crazy," which has been deemed not to be defamation as it is an opinion expressed as "slang." Insanity on the other hand is a legal and medical term indicating a disorder associated with diminished behavioral responsibility, and hence is not merely an opinion when expressed as a fact.  

Thus, calling me “crazy and bitter” is not defamation. Calling me “fucking crazy” or a “lunatic” or any other “slang” pejorative is also not defamation (as has been legally established by precedent), since it is understood that the accuser is not talking literally using medical or legal terms. “Insane" and “insanity” are medical and legal terms with a specific meaning.  Calling someone “insane” as a statement of fact, in the absence of supporting evidence, is therefore defamation and is legally actionable.

Based on the above, there seems to be at least some legal theory supporting the contention that Johnson’s tweet is legally actionable defamation.

Rank-and-file activists should carefully consider the judgment of a “leader” who would expose themselves to liability via reckless, defamatory tweets.

Second, evolution:

The “Majority Rightization” of Counter-Currents continues apace (perhaps it is therefore appropriate that “Silver” rears its head again). One of the characteristics of Majority Right’s rapid decline phase was the long, turgid, barely comprehensible essays of Daniel S that took thousands of words to express an opinion that could have been more effectively and efficiently summarized in one short paragraph. We are getting newer “writers” at Counter-Currents who mimic this style, hiding intellectual vacuity behind unnecessarily dense and wordy prose (good ideas are instead typically associated with clarity and elegant expression). The main point of one such pseudo-intellectual vomiting is thus (emphasis added):

The value system of this narrative seems to subordinate peoples of European descent to their technologically progressive destiny. Indeed, the main focus of attention appears to be the relentless drive to the beyond, a self-justified virtue, which just happens to be contained within a vehicle we call “white people.” Articulating this telos demonstrates the similarities between the “march of the Titans” narrative in the Dissident Right and the maligned “conservative” value set typified by American Baby Boomers. Both views of historical meaning hold technological progress, which is to say, the manipulation of natural forces, above the preservation (or at least recognizable continuity) of European descended peoples. The two views seem to differ only in their preferred time frames. This observation invites a disturbing question. What is the difference between a future in which European-descended peoples have converged and transcended themselves to the inevitable point of unrecognizability, and the new post-ethnic man at the end of the Left’s mission to converge all humanity through their ideology of cosmopolitan progress?

Let’s for the sake of argument agree that these are the two possible outcomes of an anti-traditionalist “progressive” view.  What’s the difference?  The first (consistent with Pierce’s cosmotheism, by the way) is a higher path, an upper path, European man on the road to godhood, achieving an understanding of the universe and actualizing opportunities for creative activity on a level analogous to that separating modern man from an insect.  The second path is a downward path of devolution, an end not a beginning, The Last Man, a mongrel creature capable of nothing except mere existence, with all avenues of higher evolution, of higher creative activity, of higher understanding, closed off. True enough, both outcomes would diminish current EGI and both would by necessity negatively affect the value system of strict preservationists who fetishize certain phenotypes.  

But obviously there are other paths. If we accept that populations of evolved organisms will not be static in any case (because of genetic drift if for no other reason, but there will always be selective pressures, although if undirected by racialist concerns we certainly would not like the outcome), we can use science, and our understanding of ultimate and proximate interests, to direct an upward path while at the same time preserving as much of our current fundamental essence as possible for as long as possible.  We need to understand that there is no pure static preservationism in evolution. If change is inevitable, it is incumbent upon us to direct that change in a manner that is optimized to our ultimate and proximate interests, to our culture, and to our aesthetic sensibilities.

Odds and Ends, 3/20/20

News and other items.

Salter on Democratic Multiculturalism.

Song for Ted Sallis.

This is very believable.  However to be fair to Trump, he seems to be growing into the role of a crisis President.

Negro athletes get tested first.  Didn’t I tell you?  “People of Color” get preferential treatment; expect the same for any future vaccine. Remember the 2004 fiasco?  Newspapers were full of pictures of smug Black women getting vaccinated.  In your face, Whitey.

Remember Johnson's words:

The most astonishing thing about the Globalvirus crisis is seeing how deep the free-market programming runs. Even people who are basically National Populists like Ramzpaul and the Zman have been running what I call the “Republican dad script,” minimizing the danger of the virus and worrying instead about protecting the economy from people who wish to protect their lives, and the lives of their loved ones. This “dad script” strikes me as equal parts alpha signaling and paternal concern for their 401Ks.

Rather than “Republican dad script”  I’d just call it the typical “Der Right script” – anti-science, anti-empiricism, a reverse snobbery against experts, framing everything as a leftist conspiracy, obsessed with economics over people, an extreme solipsism that confuses belief and faith with reality, and an extreme allergy for fact-checking, with the consequence of being wrong about just about everything.  But, hey, Zturd knows more than Fauci, so let's take the "party on" advice.

And don’t start quoting HBDers as “proof” that the Right embraces science – HBD, and most of what passes for rightist “science” – is not science, but a secular religion, a fossilized dogma, pure pseudoscience.  Instead of worshipping the god of the bible, the Chinese are worshipped instead.  Same difference. As I’ve written before, the Right’s close association with religion and “tradition” have much to do with its hatred of, and complete misunderstanding of, and practical rejection of, science and empiricism. Anti-elitist, anti-government, anti-intellectual, reactionary, libertarian strains of “thought” make every expert suspect to this mindset – genuine expertise is scorned as “credentialism” and any person’s private opinion becomes conflated with objective reality.

How is this different from HBD? How is the Chinese behavior that Pompeo describes different from the HBD misinformation campaign to aid China? But there's more. Pompeo admits that the Chinese sent people to Italy when the virus was raging in China.  An official of the US government essentially admits what the Chinese did to the Italian people. Every Italian who dies from this virus will have been MURDERED by the Chinese people. Listen to Pompeo 00:40 to 00:50.  Chinese genocide against Italy.  Chinese genocide against all of Europe.  Chinese genocide against White Americans.  MURDER.  GENOCIDE.  

Excellent.  Excellent.

Well, well,well…read this.  Too bad he leaves out other important reasons - HBD worship of East Asians and sexual-masochistic Chinatrix fantasies (exemplified by the Silkers and their wet dream of black-booted Chinese girls with guns ruling the West).

The China shills leaving comments there are amusing. One shouldn’t be surprised by their spelling mistakes, as ESL types often make errors.

The Arctic Alliance!  Oh well.  “Rosie” can collect Derb’s life insurance money in that case, right?  Hail China!

HBD must be mercilessly destroyed.

The Zturd youth.

Are the Italians still singing on balconies?  How about chanting “Death to China!” instead?

This is the Chinese reaction to the Italian death toll passing that of China. The Chinese are laughing at you. And why not?  Always remember, never forget – when the epidemic was raging in China, and the Chinese knew it was raging, Chinese were moving back and forth between China and Italy and Chinese “tourists” were visiting Italy.  Even Pompeo admits it.  Why shouldn’t they laugh as you hug them?

Now, some more on Zturd. I do not like to pathologize dissenting opinions; after all, that is what the Left does, and that is what my critics in Der Movement do to me (“crazy, bitter, paranoid”). But sometimes one has to call a spade a spade, and that’s where we have reached with Zturd’s whining about the Amren conference being canceled (emphasis added):

Later in the week, I had an e-mail exchange with someone, who is most certainly on this side of the great divide. The e-mail was about the cancellation of this year’s American Renaissance and other dissident events due to the panic. I once again assumed he was on the sober minded side of this issue, so I freely called it a panic. 

So, we can safely assume that if the pandemic is still raging in May that Zturd would support the Amren conference still being held (assuming the state of Tennessee would allow it). Very well. Let us consider together.

Let us for a moment forget my personal opinion of Taylor, Brimelow, Dickson et al. and let us acknowledge that those individuals (especially Taylor) are generally highly regarded in the “movement” and are considered “elder statesmen” so to speak. The “elder” reminds us that those three gentlemen are older individuals, certainly in the age range in which coronavirus infection could result in significant morbidity, perhaps even mortality (death).

So, let us follow Zturd’s wishes and hold the meeting. Several hundred people are congregating there during a highly contagious pandemic. There’s a good chance at least one of them is infected, perhaps a younger person not so badly affected.  They spread it around the conference.  Older attendees fall ill, some need hospitalization, and perhaps someone dies.  Perhaps one of the aforementioned elder statesmen die.  So, should Amren gamble with Jared Taylor’s life just so they can pound their chests and say how they “defied the alarmist herd?" Is that the "sober minded side of this issue?" Zturd seems to think so. Zturd seems to consider the possibility of killing Taylor via coronavirus a reasonable price to pay so Zturd can leave “Lagos” for a weekend and attend the Amren meeting.

Zturd also looks at what’s happening in Italy, and the rest of Europe, and claims that the only positive outcome of serious mitigation efforts in America will be to “save a few extra people this year.” A few extra people.

I’m sorry. I must pathologize. The man’s deranged. He’s also dishonest to put up a strawman argument that the “alarmists” are unaware of the economic and social costs of the mitigation strategy. They are very much aware. They are also aware of the alternative, of which Zturd, with his “few extra people” gibbering, is, apparently, unaware. Again, the man’s deranged. 

Guess what Zturd, you are not the only one being inconvenienced. You are not the only one taking a severe financial hit.  All of the “alarmists” are as well. The difference is that they look at what is happening around the world, understand the full range of consequences, and understand that the Chinese have put us in a position that we need to make hard choices in which we suffer either way we choose. The difference is that they are not so cavalier with the lives of, potentially, hundreds of thousands or millions of White Americans. The difference is that they are not insane. 

Gaslighting Anti-Vaxxers

How come I’m not surprised?

The scheduled blog post for today has been postponed in order to bring you the following public service announcement.

It makes sense that the anti-White, pro-HBD, pseudoscience site Counter-Currents promotes anti-vaccination propaganda from scientifically illiterate, paranoid retards.

Once again – vaccines are not dangerous for 99.999% of people, they prevent terrible diseases, and no, “Big Pharma” really doesn’t make their "big money" from those dastardly scary needles. They instead make their real BIG MONEY from all those nice pills and syrups the peanut gallery have no problem with. Want a real scandal? How about telling Americans that they all have to be on statins and blood pressure medication and metformin, instead of telling them to stop being fat bastards?  How about telling students that they have the drug-requiring diagnosis of "attention deficit disorder" instead of being honest with them and telling them they are dumb and lazy and thus unsuited for academics? How about generics from Asia that are, literally, poison?  But, no. Those scary needles are sodomizing our babies, tainting their precious bodily fluids and given them autism, and we can’t have that. Let’s all get measles, whooping cough, tetanus, and diphtheria instead.  Good clean fun!  What about polio?  Bring back the iron lung!  Smallpox!  Rabies!  Enjoy!

Greg Johnson is not only a gaslighting, panhandling turd, he’s now revealed to be an evil gaslighting panhandling turd as well.  For all his faults, he's educated and, presumably, has a triple digit IQ. He has to know better. But I suppose this is all part of the "big tent" approach of "reaching out to" all sorts of "communities" to "spread the message."  That he likely thinks it will bring in more supporters and hence more "D'Nations" doesn't (to his:"mind") hurt either. Of course, he doesn't realize that for every "Stan the Man" and for every "if I got bitten by a rabid animal I wouldn't get the vaccine" Stronza he loses, alienates, and disgusts, educated STEMers. But, hey, it's Der Movement, and there's a reason why the Quota Queens require a strict ethnic affirmative action program to keep their positions of "leadership."

The mindset of some of these nitwits is similar to that of the tragicomic conspiracy theorist "J Richards" at Majority Rights who peddled "moon landing hoax" theories on the premise that "if we can convince people the government lied to them about that we we can convince them the government is lying about race as well." Just substitute "moon landing" with "vaccines" and you understand the (truly psychopathic) mindset there. The actual truth means nothing.  What these retards fail to understand is that the converse is more true - once people understand that Der Movement lies to them about moon landings and vaccines, they'll suspect that Der Movement is lying to them about race as well (and to some extent, they'll be correct).

This is real science.  There’s a reason why educated, rational scientists support vaccination – people who have no vested interests in “making big money” off of vaccination. Vaccination saves lives.  It reduces morbidity and mortality. It is a great invention of Western science – Jenner and Pasteur.

Read this.

Read this.

I’m not getting any money promoting vaccination. I’m not a MD or a member of “Big Pharma.” I AM someone who had various childhood diseases now preventable by vaccination and the thought of shitfaced scumbags promoting the spread of disease, among others, because of their self-righteous ignorance or rent-seeking grifting, is sickening. Anyone who gives these retards a platform to, essentially, spread disease and sicken White men, women, and children is a turd of the first order. That means you Greggy. Unfortunately, there’s no vaccination for stupidity or mendacity.

And the Far Right is never going to expand out of its Nutzi Retard ghetto if it continues to be an embarrassing, and-scientific, irrational gaggle of tin foil hat imbeciles. The Right always acts the fool, and the Far Right is the worst.

One sane comment:

OrcishPosted February 4, 2020 at 3:34 pm | PermalinkI wouldn’t listen to all that. Vaccines were considered a major public health breakthrough before “big pharma” existed. if the formulations in use were dangerous competitors would be all over it making safe ones.

And as I’ve written before, unlike all those nice little pills and flavored syrups the fat bastards consume as they roll along the ground, American-used vaccines are manufactured (so far) either here or in Western Europe, not in India or China. Granted, once vaccines are manufactured in India and/or China, then I’ll agree that they then would be manifestly unsafe, just like all your wonderful maintenance medicines are. But not now.

Now, are vaccines 100%, absolutely guaranteed, harmless for every single individual who may take them?  Of course not.  In biology, nothing is. Among the hundreds of millions of vaccine recipients there may be a few whose genetic background, immune systems, etc. are such that they’ll have a bad reaction. There is always some risk in life (autism in children from MMR NOT being one of them) – that’s balanced against Smallpox, Polio, Tetanus, Measles, Rabies, etc.  Is this actually a serious conversation?  Were Jenner and Pasteur “psychopathic” “Jew doctors” working for “Big Pharma?”  Stop the crap already.

As I’ve written before, the fact that objective facts about medicines manufactured in Asia are ignored in favor of tin foil hat conspiracy theories about vaccines demonstrates that anti-vaxx hysteria has it ultimate genesis in the pills vs needles dichotomy, and the psychosexual anxieties weak-minded hysterics have about being “violated” by being “forcibly injected” (“sodomized”*) by the “scary needles.”

There’s also the SJW-like ignoring of science and the smug self-righteousness of anti-vaxxers whose personal identity is wound up in their belief system. Thus, they label everyone who argues in favor of vaccination as “psychopaths” who are part of a “Big Pharma” conspiracy.

Excuse me now as I rub my hands together, cackling insanely, as I await my Big Pharma compensation check for promoting autism among vaccinated children.

Idiots.

*By vaccines bad.  My flirtatious Alt Right meeting attendees or by Mannerbund colleagues good, good, good!