Four Observations, 7/17/20

Some observations.

1. A. James Gregor described Nordicism as an ideology of despair, since a Nordicist theme often was (is?) that everyone – including modern Northern Europeans – are mongrel degenerates, not comparable to the noble pure Nordics of the past, that “the great race” was “passing,” that all that is great and good is threatened by racial contamination from inferior peoples.

HBD-Nordicism is likewise an ideology of despair; here the theme is that Whites – at least the real, Herrenvolk Whites – are so genetically individualistic that nothing activists can do will interest those Whites in becoming adaptively ethnocentric.  The best that we can all do is sit back and hope things get so bad that the “implicit ethnocentrism” of Whites will somehow become activated (likely too late in any case).

Gee…if that’s the case, then what’s the point of giving hundreds of thousands of dollars per year to “movement” grifters?  It’s not like they can ever accomplish anything, right?

2. There are certain “movement leaders” whose current ideology – in some cases opposite of what they promoted in the past – has been adopted merely to spite other “leaders” that they are feuding with.  What happens though is that the new ideology becomes part of the “leader’s” activist identity, they become emotionally invested in it, their massive ego demands that they defend it, even against arguments they themselves would have made in the past.  Can such people ever be trusted, even in the slightest?

3. Much “movement” discourse is essentially essays and articles telling us how bad things are and how Jews and Coloreds are working for our demise.  Very well, but my basic problem with such contributions is that they are essentially midway in the continuum of analysis.  On the one hand, they never explore, ultimately, how and why things reached the current sorry state, they never explore why “our side” has endlessly failed and let the Jews and Coloreds rise to positions of power and authority over us, they never identify the individuals and organizations on our side, always sufficiently funded, who have done absolutely nothing to stem the tide –nay, who have actually helped to make things worse.  It’s just that, hey, this is how things are today, and, boy, aren’t they bad!

Then, on the other hand, these analyses rarely if ever move on from the descriptive to the prescriptive, and tell us what we need to do from this point on to effectively deal with the situation.  Again, we are just told, over and over again, how bad things are, and how they will get worse, but no word on why we are where we are or what we should do next.

It’s the same old story time and again.  At some point we can ask – how is any of this at all helpful?

4. Consider this post and the accompanying comments thread.  If you have free time, do go through the most or all of the comments.

Consider that was nine years ago.  Since then, nearly a decade has passed.  We’ve seen the rise and fall of the Alt Right, we’ve seen the election of God Emperor Trump, we've seen millions of dollars of “D’Nations” be funneled into the accounts of “movement” organizations, we’ve seen the insanity of 2020, we’ve seen the migration crisis in Europe, we’ve seen many, many things.  

Now, compare that 2011 post and comments thread to the situation today.  Any real difference?  No. Nothing getting done, endless talk, endless feuding (even with the usual suspects involved), zero progress, zero planning, zero judgment, and the “let’s air dirty laundry in public” attitude as if these posts and comments thread are only being read by – dare I say it based on the subject of the post? – an activist elite, rather than by anyone with an Internet connection (including “watchdog groups” and other “antis”).  

I’ll say one thing positive about the CMS – to the extent that they are “confidential” and are working quietly behind the scenes - that is the right approach.  They may not get anything useful done, but this spewing forth of “movement” bile – some things never change, eh?  That whole exchange could have very easily have been 2020, rather than 2011.  It’s all one.

And for laughs, here is how Greg Johnson ends one of his comments on that thread:

Lapses in judgment like this really beggar the imagination.

Any movement with leaders like this is a joke.

Readers of EGI Notes understand why I find that comically ironic and highly amusing.  Yes, Greg, lots of “lapses in judgment” that “really beggar the imagination” – and, yes, “any movement with leaders like this is a joke.”  You see, we are in complete agreement – although when I say things like that – particularly when I cite your own “lapses in judgment” and when I include you in the “leaders like this” who make the “movement” into a “joke” - then I’m “crazy and bitter” as well as “insane and indecent.”

The hypocrisy really beggars the imagination.