His Fraudulency

Dementia Joe’s new title.

See this.

We must make this clear: The legitimate President of the United States, 2021-2025, is Donald J. Trump.  Joe Biden’s “victory” is completely illegitimate, it must never be accepted or legitimized by right-thinking people, and anyone and everyone enabling this fraud must be remembered and held accountable.

Joe Biden must be referred to, from now on, as His Fraudulency.

The reality of Trump.

See this.

The situation is a perfect setup, in other words, for a talented politician to run on Trumpism in 2024. A person without the eager Twitter fingers and greedy hotel chains, someone with a penchant for governing rather than golf. An individual who does not irritate everyone who doesn’t already like him, and someone whose wife looks at him adoringly instead of slapping his hand away too many times in public. Someone who isn’t on tape boasting about assaulting women, and who says the right things about military veterans. Someone who can send appropriate condolences about senators who die, instead of angering their state’s voters, as Trump did, perhaps to his detriment, in Arizona. A norm-subverting strongman who can create a durable majority and keep his coalition together to win more elections.  

Well, well, five years too late…

Look, I endorsed Trump and voted for him, but the man is and always was a despicable turd. I identified Trump as a fraud and a vulgar ignorant buffoon even before the 2016 election and he proved me right by betraying his base for the past four years. He acts surprised about what is going on – but who was it who refused to “drain the swamp?” Who was it who actually enabled the swamp and refilled it with more fetid water?  That’s you Donnie. Now that swamp is swallowing you and you are baffled.  Surprise!

Trump and his supporters are upset about the GOP not rallying to his defense. Hey, Donnie – the GOP is “monitoring the situation.” Sound familiar?  What goes around comes around.

An explanation as to why Johnson keeps on promoting the lie that Trump could have won in 2016 with a Jeb Bush platform is something I read on Occidental Dissent – that Richard Spencer has been asserting the truth that Trump stumbled into the immigration issue and cynically used it for electoral success without really believing in it – essentially my view. Johnson’s reflexive and bizarre obsession about Spencer likely informs his gaslighting about Trump’s alleged “sincerity.”

See this.

We at the National Alliance are so focused on building racial consciousness among the best of our people, and on building the Alliance itself, that we would have little to no time for electoral politics…

Strom may not be interested in electoral politics but electoral politics is interested in him. His work depends on certain realities, including the continuation of an open society. The Senate situation is, unfortunately due to GA voter fraud, still open and fluid.  If the Jan. 5 runoffs go the wrong way, that ultimately is going to affect the ability of Strom to utilize the First Amendment to spread his message.  Strom may claim he doesn’t care, but then I’d like to read and hear what Strom has to say about what he is going to do if he’s censored off the Internet and his racial views are considered forbidden “hate speech.”

Romanian women making themselves useful.  Any comments from Munro?

How’s that Arctic Alliance coming along, Johnny?

So, let us all forget the past five days of Johnson screaming about the stolen election, the dire consequences of a Trump loss, and the absolute need for Trump to keep on fighting and never concede.

If you remember Johnson writing or saying that, you are obviously “insane.”  Just as you are "insane" for remembering this.

Remember – there is no way out but through Johnson.

American White racial activism can be saved only through dismantling Der Movement and its affirmative action policy and by deposing the Quota Queens.

Speaking of which, some questions for Johnson. He angrily rejects my assertion that he himself is a product of affirmative action. But what about his arch enemy Spencer then?  Will Johnson please tell us all what were Spencer’s qualifications for being made President of the NPI?  What?  His sterling work at TAC and Taki’s Mag (I’ll pass over the question as to how he was qualified even for that)? What? You, Johnson, justify your sudden elevation to TOQ editor because you have “a PhD” – does Spencer have “a PhD?”  Did he write any books or write any peer-reviewed papers of importance? Did he have many years of activist experience? What was it? Or was it merely that as a young and well-connected preppy WASP he appealed to his older co-ethnics at CMS who saw in him a younger version of themselves (in more ways than one, eh, given his record of non-stop, constant failure?) and recognized him as “one of the boys?”  

What is more important to Johnson I wonder?  His hatred of Spencer or his self-serving need to defend the affirmative action policy? Will Johnson stomach his hatred of Spencer and regale us with Spencer's lost history of accomplishments that justified the NPI appointment? Or will Johnson, as usual, ignore these questions?