Behold Milady, Behold Der Movement
Odds and ends.
That’s right, blame Trump because you and your husband are/were a couple of retards.
It's not clear how much chloroquine the man ingested, and Banner Health said he and his wife ingested a version of the chemical that's used to clean aquariums.
To this day, my morning routine consists of exercising while listening to some of my favorite metal bands like Manowar, Bathory, and Goatmoon.
Type I alert!
While living in Eastern Europe…
As an ethnic Dane, violating the ethnic homogeneity of other peoples.
As white people of European descent, we are expected to play a game where everyone else is allowed to cheat but we are the only ones forced to play by the rules. And what are the rules? The unspoken rules are that white people aren’t allowed to have an identity or be proud of our heritage. White people aren’t allowed to have an in-group preference or freedom of association.
Does “freedom of association” include Eastern Europeans rejecting having this scumbag use their nations as brothels? Does it include Hungary deporting John Morgan?
Through the years, I’ve made a lot of mistakes in my careers, relationships, and overall priorities in life.
Writing for Counter-Currents, for example.
In a recent article Arndt discussed women’s tactics in attracting men, such as dressing to show breasts.[ii] Her story, appropriate titled “Busted: The Politics of Cleavage and a Glance”, combined anecdote, interviews and behavioural science. She drew on research on male–female differences in sex drive to argue that women who dress sexily in public are flaunting their sexual power…
Behold milady (emphasis added):
A young man and woman are having a friendly chat after a yoga class. The fresh-faced blonde seems totally relaxed but then she freezes. ''Did you just look at my chest,'' she asks angrily, arms firmly folded.
''Yep,'' mutters the bloke sheepishly. Her response is fierce. ''Can't I go to one yoga class without being ogled by some jerk?''
Instead of being cowed, he takes her on, launching into a passionate defence of his action: ''If you really didn't want me to stare at your beautiful breasts, you'd be wearing something other than a purple sports bra covering maybe one-third of your perfect tits,'' he argues, suggesting, among other things, that he's biologically programmed to scan for life-giving breasts for his future offspring. He's cute, passionate and ultimately convincing. She ends up asking him out for coffee.
But when young women stand in front of mirrors on a Saturday night, adjusting their cleavage, seeking ever greater exposure, maybe they need to think more about what they are doing. While there are women who claim they dress sluttishly just to make themselves feel good, the fact remains that, like the protesters, the main message sent is about flaunting women's sexual power.
It's an ''UP YOURS'' gesture of the most provocative kind.
This girl hasn't a clue but plenty of other women know exactly what they are doing, as they make clear in internet discussions of this issue.
''I luv my 36DDs and show them off. I like to see men drool.''''It's so funny when some men get caught cos they have that 'Am I in trouble?' look on their face!''''It is a tease thing … men are so weak.''We have such power over them.''
Jean* is a 33-year-old, extremely attractive Sydney divorcee completing her PhD in physics. She has a fit body and large breasts, which she likes showing off in revealing clothes. When she ''gets the girls out'', she enjoys the subtle looks, even a discreet compliment about her body from the right man.
''A quick glance from them, a little moment of recognition, and then back to the conversation. It's part of the dance, hinting at a possible connection,'' she says.
Are some allowed to look and others not?
''Well, I think there's a sort of sexual food chain and I prefer to engage with people on a similar level as me. Sometimes it feels sleazy when I'm way out of the observer's league, like if they're really old or fat or ugly.''
That's the problem. She's advertising her wares to the world, not just her target audience, and somehow men are expected to know when they are not on her page. Jean describes at length the subtle dance, based largely on non-verbal behaviour, that she uses to show men when attention is welcome. But as we all know, many men are lousy at that stuff - the language totally escapes them.
''In one of my workshops, I remember a guy describing women flaunting their bodies as a form of 'biological sexual harassment' towards men, to which most of the group gave a collective nod,'' Tiller says.
The internet is bristling with men writing about what they regard as women's sexual arrogance. Provocative female attire is an assault against men, writes Giovanni Dannato for In Mala Fide, an online magazine of heretical ideas. He argues women exposing…amounts to ''an act of aggression in which they use the power of their sex as a weapon'', he writes.
F. Roger Devlin, a political philosopher who writes challenging material on gender issues for The Occidental Quarterly, points out these beta males have long been tearing their hair out trying to discover what on earth they have to do to make themselves acceptable to the girl next door. They get the message that what women instinctively want is ''for 99 per cent of the men they run into to leave them alone, buzz off, drop dead, while the one to whom they feel attracted makes all their dreams come true''.
But surely men have a right to show what it's like to be on the receiving end. There's a great scene in the animated television comedy Family Guy, where Peter Griffin, the overweight, ugly, blue-collar dad, lets fly about Lindsay Lohan putting on her little outfits and jumping around on stage throwing ''those things'' in front of his face. ''What am I supposed to do? What do you want from me?'' he asks plaintively. But he knows the answer all too well: ''I'll tell you what you want. You want NOTHING. We all know no woman anywhere wants to have sex with anyone and to titillate us with any thoughts otherwise is just bogus.''
Griffin's howl of protest is based on the simple truth that some men spend their lives in a state of sexual deprivation, dealing with constant rejection. Roy F. Baumeister is a psychology professor at Florida State University who has extensively researched gender difference in sex drive. ''Sexual frustration is almost inevitable for the majority of men and not just occasionally. They won't have enough partners or even enough sex with one partner to satisfy their wishes,'' Baumeister writes, concluding, ''the tragedy of the male sex drive'' is men's state of perpetual readiness, which so rarely meets its match.
Of course men are going to want to look - ''it feels like there's a magnet in her chest'' one man complained.
''He tells the story of a meeting with a young woman wearing a fairly fitted yellow dress, ''popping out of the top''.
''The conversation was about the rate I was going to charge them for advertising. As I looked down at my notebook and did some basic sums, I realised that she was leaning forward, deliberately showing her tits, presumably to throw my concentration.'' He called her bluff.
''I started to laugh and made a comment about putting her body on the line for the business!''
She backed off, embarrassed, and he got his deal done.
She'd yell abuse at guys catcalling from cars at her. ''I can wear whatever I want!'' Only now does she think about the confused young men she left in her wake, the mixed messages she'd sent them. ''Deep down I was much more aware of my power than I actually let on.''
But, remember men - don't objectify milady! Don't distract milady as she works hard to solve the mysteries of the cosmos and create new cultural artifacts. Joan of Arc! All of this demonstrates that homosexuals have no business whatsoever discussing heterosexual male-female relations and no business discussing the role of milady in the general society. Only heterosexual men have a full understanding of the malicious scope of female perfidy.
Spencer is right here…of course, this blog said this first.
Mudshark Annie – Quota King retard.
It’s a nothingburger! Wrong, wrong, they’re always wrong.
How does that HBD cognitive elitism look now? Meanwhile, it’s Sallis who has always been right – the existential meaning of Asians is hatred of Whites. Yellow or brown it doesn’t matter – Asians gonna Asian.
Case in point. Asians are psychopathic. Right, “Tricky Dick” Lynn?
Let's assume for a moment that at least some of the crude anti-Asian comments by Whites actually occur. What's the net political outcome of that Bunkerism? True enough, it can have some beneficial effects. For example, it can provoke Asians into revealing the seething anti-White hatred that defines the existential meaning of the Asian peoples. It can inflame White-Asian hostility and expose Derbyshire's "Arctic Alliance" for the absurdity that it is. However, on the other hand, given White weakness and pitiful SJW tendencies, this Bunkerism creates undeserved sympathy for the monsters who have infected the world. Unfortunately, this latter effect will likely predominate over the former. So, it's best to eschew crude Bunkerism that has no real beneficial political effect and concentrate instead on political anti-Asianism. Instead of mindless cursing, how about arguments being made to throw Asian-"Americans" into internment camps or, better still, repatriate them to their ethnic/racial homelands? Those arguments not only have the same net effect of strengthening White-Asian animus, but can provoke debate and discussion. Let the Asians explain why they should not interned or repatriated, and, no doubt, by their hysterical hate-filled reactions will display to open-minded Whites precisely why that should be their fate. That's a lot better than Bunkerite mindless cursing.
Something ominous = Chinese people. Those bizarre aliens (ET phone home) will one day kills us all. They’re killing many of us today.
Colored is as colored does – the TROPICAL Japanese as part of the rising tide of color TROPICAL ALLIANCE against Whites.
Are Asians exempt from this law? They’ve been bragging online about terrorizing people with fake coughing. How come they get a free pass? Yellow Privilege?
When are German troops going to go there to aid the Turks and help force migrants into Greece?
E. Michael Jones is an absolute moron and a turd, but this excerpt from a comment left at Counter-Currents provides food for thought:
And Jones may rant against Jews but I prefer that to Jared Taylor’s quietism. Sometimes I wonder if the neo Wasp Taylors aren’t waiting to make a new deal with the Chosen People – one that will leave ordinary whites of lower IQ’s including Anglos at the bottom of the some High Anglo – Jewish libertarian matrix.
But now I think I may be ranting myself. That is because lately I have begun to wonder if the WASP isn’t undercover in WN and articles like this that dismiss Jones as crank and ranter increase this suspicion So I just need to say = and even the Germanophile Jones won’t say this -the WASP’s contribution to white civilization in the last century was to team up with the Jew to bring down fascism – the fascism which was the white’s chance to save our civilization. That is not a good recommendation for a neo WASP resurgence in WN. WASP’s give it up to the Jew.
Andrew Fraser weeps.
The “movement’s” ethnic affirmative action program and the HBD-Nordicist-ethnonationalist alliance are both criticized in one fell swoop with that comment – although the letter writer doesn’t know he/she/it has done so.
It would be a good idea to better understand why different people, even of the same age cohort, can have such radically different disease courses with the China Plague. There should be studies done comparing people matched for age, underlying co-morbidities (or the lack thereof), sex, etc., with the individuals tested for (a) genetic ethnoracial ancestry (via population geneticists not “testing companies”), (b) full genome sequencing looking for gene variants, and (c) full human gene microarray analysis looking at gene expression (protein arrays can also be performed given the possibility of regulation of gene expression at the translational level – after all, ultimately, what we are looking at are proteins and their functions [with the exception of, e.g., functional RNAs]).
Labels: Asians, behold the female, behold the movement, Bunker, China, Chinese, Counter Currents, Devlin, disease, ethnonationalism, health, homosexuals, odds and ends, sex, sex differences, sexual behavior, Trump
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home