Odds and Ends, Memorial Day 2020

In der news.

Re: 5/23/20 FMA livestream. Greg Johnson doesn’t have the discipline to work out at home and he also needs a trainer at the gym.

A personal trainer must be paid. Where does the money come from, all ye rank-and-file supporters and donors?  How many of YOU have a private trainer at a gym?  Does it bother you that those you give donations to live better than you do?

This is what we call Herrenvolk Logic – Dershowitz is for something, therefore it is bad.

Actually, I wouldn’t go so far as to make the vaccinations mandatory in the sense Dershowitz advocates.  Just shun the anti-vaxxers, limit their movements so they don’t spread disease, and hold them legally accountable if they do spread disease. If contact tracing demonstrates that an anti-vaxxer caused disease – that’s assault and battery if the victim survives and homicide if they die. Only fair, no?

And while we should reject vaccines because Dershowitz supports them, anti-vaxx vaccine skepticism is justified because of tweets from those medical and epidemiological experts Roosh and Michelle Malkin.  Dat right!

Questions for the anti-vaxx filth – Do you believe that the forcible quarantine of Mary Mallon (“Typhoid Mary”) was unfair? Did it limit her “freedom?”  Her body, her choice!  How dare Big Gummint tell her she can’t work as a cook!  Just because she was killing people means nothing. And, after all, anti-vaxxers tell us that viruses and bacteria don’t cause disease anyway!  So there!  We should worry instead about the “bullets flying everywhere” that are wiping out all non-human animal life on Earth!

More questions for the anti-vaxxers - If you or your children were to be bitten by a rabid animal, would you consent to the "jabbing" with rabies vaccine and rabies immune globulin? Yes or no? If your child were to get a deep puncture would for which the probability for tetanus was high, would you consent for them to be "jabbed" with tetanus vaccine?  If the inept and TROPICAL Chinese were to "accidentally" release smallpox from one of their laboratories, sparking an outbreak, would you consent to a smallpox vaccination?  Why do you tweet and retweet doctored and edited videos that maliciously and mendaciously make it sound that Gates and Fauci are promoting intentionally harming people with vaccines, when you damn well know that it is not true?  If people die as a result of your anti-vaxx lies, are you prepared for the moral and legal consequences?

If you would like to see a pictorial example of what anti-vaxx filth like Red Ice want - in the de facto, ultimate outcome, sense (not implying intention) - for your children, see this.  It doesn't matter if it is intentional or not.  Criminal negligence is a crime.  Promoting disease by advocating against vaccination has real life consequences, including death. With freedom comes responsibility.  You can't have one without the other.  

Jenner and Pasteur are spinning in their graves. The fruits of White genius flushed down the toilet by childish retards frightened of scary needles “jabbing” them.

In the past, parents could only dream that there would be a way to save their child who was bitten by a rabid dog, or to prevent their child from being paralyzed by polio, or disfigured or killed by smallpox, or killed by tetanus, or killed by diphtheria or measles - and now that this is possible, and that White genius has brought these gifts to humanity, hysterical retards are throwing it all away.

The real poisons are the maintenance medications, most produced in India and China, which The Great White Whales and their pudgy offspring gladly take because they can’t push away from the table and can’t admit their children are just dumb. But, hey, they're nice pills and not scary needles, so who cares?  Pills don't "jab" you.

The coming man  That’s “coming” not “cumming” - in case any men sexually harassing Pilleater were confused about that.

What you do is not debate it – just call it “shit” or “insane” or “indecent.” Then you have a “discussion” with folks who agree with you on everything and congratulate you on your willingness to “debate.”

Ripostes:

Patriotic Black Man

@BlackPatriotic

Replying to

@NewRightAmerica

Greg is clearly letting his Spencer hatred inform his Woods hatred.  I found out about Keith from a counter currents podcast

John Wilcox

@JohnWil48506230

Replying to

@NewRightAmerica

Not wanting to debate a willing opponent is always a good look. Also, wasn’t Bowden pretty clearly a third positionist?

This is particularly relevant:

Not wanting to debate a willing opponent is always a good look.

Johnson only “debates” two types – either morons he knows he can beat or people who basically agree with him. Why folks take this specimen seriously is a mystery;  well, actually not a mystery - affirmative action, faux intellectualism and a PhD (not “credentialism” in his case, of course), a lack of competition, etc.

I don’t know who this “Keith Woods” is, but if it is someone who Johnson is running from, there must be something useful there.

Very true.

Question – does morality also play a role in “movement” politics?  If so, what can we say about a person who doles out, or withholds, criticism based upon how influential the target is in the “movement," and based upon the possible affect such criticism would have on the critic's meeting invitations and “D’Nations?”


Is such a person immoral?  On the other hand, if a person speaks truth to power, even to the extent of being labeled “insane” and indecent,” are they moral?  Just asking.

Sallis is doing well (emphasis added).

And not all benefits are physical: anger can help with negotiating, too. A major flashpoint for aggression is the discovery that someone does not value your interests highly enough. It involves inflicting costs – the threat of physical violence – and withdrawing benefits – loyalty, friendship, or money – to help them see their mistake.

Everyone has interests.  If yours are not being taken seriously, why stand for it?  Why be an extended phenotype for someone else’s interests?

Quota King Ann Coulter.  Gee…what ever happened to In Trump We Trust?  Affirmative action means never having to admit being wrong.

Mudshark Annie is still waiting for Costello to serve her and Dinesh breakfast in bed.  Nighttime activity works up a hearty appetite.

Always remember – when high-T Quota King Coulter was doing her In Trump We Trust shtick, Sallis was calling Trump a vulgar ignorant buffoon. Who was right?  Who was wrong?  When are the rank-and-file Nutzis going to stop the affirmative action program?

Those two faced sneaky liars!  Giggles…and gives the words "ditzy" and "airhead" new meaning. Seriously though, how did we degenerate from William Pierce to this? Yes, I’m critical of Pierce, but how can you compare him to Sorority Girl White nationalism?  Please explain to me again how WN 2.0 is so superior to WN 1.0. I’m not getting it.

Well, of course. Why did any of you ever take that giggling retard seriously in the first place?

Sallis answers yes.  An associate of mine attended one of those Scandinavian conferences at which Miss Giggles was a speaker.  He said all speeches were good, except hers, which was unbearable.  When the conference speeches were put online I couldn’t get through two minutes of hers.


Again, when Babushka hits the wall, none of her beta (ex)fanboys will care in the slightest what she has to say, and they’ll pretend like she never existed.

Well, gee…Brazil’s flubro approach certain is working out well, huh?

While these criticisms of “movement” “rock stars” is necessary (and amusing), there are limits to what can be achieved through purely deconstructivist tactics. So, while such critiques will continue, they’ll be a bit targeted and perhaps less frequent.

There are some projects of importance required.  First, the ongoing project, the main thrust of the Sallis Groupuscle, is the defense and promotion of the fundamental Yockeyian vision of the Western or European Imperium (always keeping in mind that is perfectly compatible with Salterian EGI).

Second, a more in depth project to create the philosophical underpinning to the Sallis Groupuscle, including a critique and rejection of the adulation of Heidegger prevalent among the “traditionalist” faction, building upon analysis of certain existentialist principles, and justifying the Sallisian worldview.