The Failure of the New Orleans Protocol

Inevitable and predictable.

Let’s take a look at the New Orleans Protocol and briefly summarize Der Movement’s abject failure to actualize the Protocol’s principles.

The protocol pledges adherents to a pan-European outlook, recognizing national and ethnic allegiance, but stressing the value of all European peoples. The three provisions of the protocols are:

1. Zero tolerance for violence.

2. Honourable and ethical behaviour in relations with other signatory groups. This includes not denouncing others who have signed this protocol. In other words, no enemies on the right.

3. Maintaining a high tone in our arguments and public presentations.

Let’s dissect this:

The protocol pledges adherents to a pan-European outlook…

There is absolutely ZERO precincts of the established “movement” – and certainly none of the major players who endorsed this Protocol. Who are “adherents to a pan-European outlook.”  Most of the American “movement” is composed of anti-pan Europeanists: ethnonationalists, Nordicists, etc.  A significant portion of the Far Right in Europe and elsewhere in the White World is the same.  Who is “pan-European?”  Sallis. Lowell.  Who else?  

…recognizing national and ethnic allegiance, but stressing the value of all European peoples. 

Perhaps the most laughable part of the Protocol: “stressing the value of all European peoples.”  If by “all” they mean “all” who derive from the north of Vienna and west of Berlin, then, yes; but if by “all” we actually mean all, then that’s ludicrous.  The “movement,” including many of the endorsers, take the completely opposite view in reality.

The three provisions of the protocols are:

1. Zero tolerance for violence.

For the most part that has been adhered to, but has not stopped System repression, and today we have leftist violence against the “movement.”

2. Honourable and ethical behavior…

OK, I've stopped laughing now.

…in relations with other signatory groups. This includes not denouncing others who have signed this protocol. In other words, no enemies on the right.

Well, maybe the signatory groups stopped attacking each other, but in general, the quota queens all feud with each other.

3. Maintaining a high tone in our arguments and public presentations.

Yes, we see this today with the Alt Right: half-drunk podcasts, Pepe and Kek, cosplay costumes at rallies.

Fact is many of the “founding endorsers” built their activist careers on doing the exact opposite of much, if not all, of the principles of this Protocol.  A further and more fundamental fact that Der Movement in general disregarded the major tenets of the Protocol and has displayed diametrically opposite behavior.

The Protocol itself was good if it was take seriously.  But we need a New Movement to see that happen.