HBD-Nordicist Conundrum

Inconsistency of Der Movement.

If you subscribe to the HBD-Nordicist dogma of significant intra-European differences in individualism vs. collectivism, outgroup altruism vs. ethnocentrism, universalism vs. particularism, as well as the Inner Hajnal vs. Outer Hajnal distinction, then, as a consequence, you should also have the consistency and honesty to blame the racial crisis of Europe on the wealthier and politically more powerful nations of Northwest Europe, who set the xenophilic tone for the direction of that continent.  Further, if your attitude toward Outer Hajnal American White ethnics is that “they all have to go back,” then you should oppose the racial destruction of Outer Hajnal Europe by Inner Hajnal racial liberalism. After all, the dastardly Outer Hajnal subhumans need real nations to "go back to," right?  Even more, you would need to ascribe America’s racial crisis at least in large part to the SJW liberalism of the Inner Hajnal populations in America, and admit that focusing on those populations, to the exclusion of other European types, for both the leadership stratum as well as the rank-and-file mass of American pro-White activism, is problematical, as those Inner Hajnals are the least ethnocentric, and the most susceptible to Jewish-Leftist manipulation, among European-Americans.

On the other hand, if you assert that all Europeans are more or less equally responsible for their fate, and that the American crisis is not primarily the responsibility of the Inner Hajnal types, and that those types are perfectly and optimally acceptable for filling the ranks of an ethnocentric “racist” movement, then that is all difficult to fit with an acceptance of the aforementioned HBD-Nordicist dogma.

Some consistency here would be helpful.  And a bit less hypocrisy as well.