Odds and Ends, 1/24/21

In der news.

One final word (at least for now) about Taylor asking that “pro-White Indian” whether he plans to move to India. Now, although the question could possibly have been phrased more tactfully (from the perspective of Amren, which is more “classy” – to use Silver’s word – than is, say, EGI Notes), I see the question as perfectly legitimate.  It is the same with Derbyshire’s absurd “Arctic Alliance” – if East Asians really wanted to help Whites as part of such an “alliance” then they could start by stop immigrating to majority White nations, optimally followed by reverse migration; i.e., repatriation back to their homelands (including “Rosie and the kids”). Likewise, the number one thing South Asians could do to help is the same, although, to be fair, from the perspective of net EGI, a “pro-White Indian” – as a single individual doing authentic pro-White activism – could be a net plus for White EGI. But, still, in general, the principle holds – ultimately, Whites need their own nations so a non-White genuinely concerned about White interests would acknowledge this and consider their own situation. Of course, these people do have a legitimate gripe in the sense that they did not force their way here; they were invited in. Now, for post-1965 American immigration, the response could be that it was the Jews (and their helpers) who did the inviting, not White Americans in general (although they helped elect politicians who served Jewish interests), but that’s not the fault of the immigrants (and their progeny) themselves. In the case of Canada, where the South Asian Taylor interviewed is from, the situation may be even murkier; the bottom line is that these Asiatics can rightly claim that they are “here” (wherever “here” is) because someone invited them.

But at the very least, if nothing else, they should agree with the principle of freedom of association – putting aside the issue of repatriation, Whites are under no obligation to live among any type of non-Whites anywhere (of course, no one, even intra-White, should be so forced).  Further, these types should agree that there should be no more immigration of their co-ethnics. Then, later, the issue of actual geographical separation, including repatriation, could be discussed.

Let’s compare this leftist hysteria with this reality here.  So, why isn’t endless violent leftist protest, which include driving the President into a bunker at the White House, trying to burn down a police station with police barricaded inside, storming statehouses, attacking political headquarters, and establishing an “autonomous zone” for godssakes – why is that not “insurrection” and a “threat to democracy?”  We have major league gaslighting going on here, that’s for sure.

Very cognitive, very elite.

Time to investigate the HBDers.

And who has been telling you that HBD is a tool of Jewish and Asian interests?  Who has been telling you to prioritize genetic and cultural kinship above a ranking of IQ?  Who has been telling you HBD is enemy propaganda, outright anti-White lies?

John_Engelman 

…I like immigrants. I have been in love with a few…I have always liked Orientals.

No doubt, Asiatrix “Ben Dover” likes John Engelman in return.

HBD is the enemy, the traitor within the gates. In order for the White race to live, the false ideology of HBD must die.

HBD is NOT “race science” or ANY sort of science. HBD is nothing more or less than a political movement to privilege Jewish and Asian interests over that of Whites. The constant lies of HBD are easy to refute, and such refutation is a common theme of this blog.

Very cognitive, very elite.