In Der News, 4/28/21

News.

See this.

In his efforts to thwart the council, Syme eventually discovers that five of the other six members are also undercover detectives…

Der Movement?

On the other hand, see this.

I refer to those who, if they don’t read exactly what corresponds to the reverberations in their own echo chamber, dismiss the writer as gay, or a cuckservative, or a Jew. This is a page torn from the Leftist playbook, neither dignified nor intelligent.

Hmmm…how about folks accusing Spencer of being a “fed?” Or a "CIA asset?" Accusing Friberg of being a “doxxer” or a “friend of Antifa?” Why are dismissals acceptable when coming from Counter-Currents? So, when Counter-Currents "punches right," it is, of course, justified and legitimate, but if other people do it, then it is "neither dignified nor intelligent."  

So what is the solution? It’s not easy to picture the Right-wing media sitting down for a type of dissident Apalachin, although, if they did, two things would be certain: the deep state and its Antifa shock troops would be about as keen for that to happen as state and local authorities were about the original in 1957, and the food would not be as good. But a virtual pow-wow is surely feasible. In the end, you may not like some dissident sites and outlets, but it will repay your time to find the ones who are rowing on the same tide as you. 

We either hang together, or, well, you know the rest.

What hypocrisy. When I and others suggested that Johnson end his feud with Spencer and Friberg, we got shot down as “low information moralizers.” How about Johnson refusing to debate Sallis and calling the latter “insane” and a “paranoid piece of crap?” King Johnson gets to indulge his personal animus, but we peons must "find the ones who are rowing on the same tide as you."

And, without getting into details, after His Fraudulency was put into power, I contacted a particular person on the Right with a call similar to what is written above by Gullick, to get folks on the Far Right, even those in opposition, to cooperate and put our heads together. I did not get a response. Surprise!

So, this whole “But a virtual pow-wow is surely feasible. In the end, you may not like some dissident sites and outlets, but it will repay your time to find the ones who are rowing on the same tide as you.  We either hang together, or, well, you know the rest” is meaningless nonsense because I see no evidence that your “movement” “leaders” have any inclination to do any of that. Your “leaders” are folks who love to “punch right” but who themselves have the weakest of glass jaws. They put their personal egos and greed for “D’Nations” above the good of our people. And then they publish calls for cooperation. If you believe you are a “leader,” then act like one. Acta, non verba.

This is insanity. The US military is supposed to be apolitical. The private political views of soldiers – regardless of whether the mendacious label those views with subjective pejorative terms such as “extremism” – should be immaterial to their role as soldiers. And then to move on to veterans – now private citizens who are no longer members of the military – and pontificate about their beliefs, to attack their right as private citizens to believe what they wish (isn’t that an integral part of the vaunted “freedom” the military is supposed to protect?), to actually assert that veteran “extremists” shouldn’t get the benefits that they earned, that is all madness. The United States has descended into a woke hell and there are no signs of reversing direction and getting out.

BernieApril 26, 2021 at 2:52 pm

If we ever achieve our ethnostate, Instauration will be required reading in all high schools.

No.

The constant Humphrey Hagiography at the failed blog Counter-Currents should be noted by all thoughtful observers.

Sigh...see this. Instead of vigorously supporting the book's anti-Christian message, we instead get wishy-washy gibbering, mixed with Christian apologia. After all, we can't offend Christian High Trusters like Fraser and Corey! If only HBD Nordicism was approached with the same nuanced view instead of an open embrace, leading to absurdities ("Swedes are highly collectivist because they are so individualistic" - from a TOO contributor).

Finally, Skrbina asks, “Can it really be beneficial to accept a myth as truth? Can one really live a happy, successful, and meaningful life dedicated to a false story or a lie?” (16). I think that the answer is that yes it can. As an evolutionist, my working hypothesis is that when it comes to the realm of ideas, evolution does not aim for truth but rather for success in continuing one’s family and increasing the prospects of one’s tribe. Certainly the religious beliefs of other groups, say Muslims, Jews, or Mormons, may well be false and based on inventions. But the people believing in these lies have often done very well in evolutionary terms and are continuing to do so.

Is HBD-Nordicism another adaptive lie for the Herrenvolk? Getting back to religion, if truth takes a back seat to adaptiveness, then why argue the truth of Skrbina's hypothesis?  We should only ask if it is adaptive. Later on, MacDonald talks about how religious Christians have more children, but he also admits some unpleasant truths about modern Christianity as a whole. If, on balance, Christianity is now maladaptive for Whites in general, then we should embrace Skrbina's work, regardless of the truth of it.

Kevin MacDonaldsays:

April 27, 2021 at 6:24 pm

I wasn’t addressing my comments to you. Anyway, I agree that there will always be Christians on our side, and we should not alienate them. I tried to make the point that Christianity has not been bad for the West until quite recently, and in a real sense it’s not the fault of Christianity, although Christian universalism was easy to subvert.

On the other hand, alienating White ethnics is not only acceptable, it is actually the raison d'etre of Der Movement

EGI Notes is a pacifist blog, opposed to all - all I say! - violence whatsoever. However, speaking purely theoretically, would it be so bad if an anti-Christian revolution breaks out in the West, including hanging the pope in St. Peter's Square, turning churches into museums or laboratories, and sending priests and reverends into forced labor camps? Needless to say, other religions, which are even more non-Western than Christianity, would equally be eliminated from White lands.  

But that is a purely theoretical question, and of course, EGI Notes would denounce in the strongest possible terms anyone who believes that any of the above is a good idea. We must have peace, brotherhood, and non-violence at all times!