Tucker’s Utility

Suvorov’s Law.

See this.

I realize that many people reading this site view Carlson as controlled opposition, but he is clearly the only mainstream media figure who is framing immigration and the demographic transformation of America as fundamentally anti-White, although he often sometimes says that it’s against the interests of all current citizens because it dilutes their voting power.

I have many problems with Carlson. At best, he is a civic nationalist Trumpian right-wing populist who wants to paper over the racial crisis with superficial constitutional patriotism. He peddles anti-covid vaxx nonsense, pandering to the droolcup segment of Trump’s base (I find it hard to believe that the preppy Spencer-like Carlson actually believes any of that nonsense), and his cuckservative whining about “freedom” concerning vaccines, masks, and lockdowns is ludicrous given that White Americans have had no freedom of association at least since the mid-1960s. However, with all of that, Carlson has utility, because his delicate “toe-in-the water” forays into White identity politics does much to legitimize those politics, leading to further radicalization, and, like Trump, his speaking on these matters, however implicit and “cucked” it is, breeds chaos and balkanization, also leading to further radicalization. So, even if he is “controlled opposition,” the net result is positive. How would things be better if Carlson was not on the air?  What would White people do instead? Read MacDonald’s HBD-Nordicism about “high trust hunter gatherers?” Read Amren constantly shilling for Asian/Jewish IQ supremacism? Read Johnson gibber about Savitri Devi or hear him chuckling about homosexuals harassing Pilleater at Alt Right meetings? It's pathetic that controlled opposition is more useful than uncontrolled opposition.

Suvorov’s Law tells us that revolutions typically do not occur during the time of greatest repression, but instead typically occur when that repression is suddenly relaxed.

If Carlson is “controlled opposition,” then that is a concession by the System to try and relieve “White rage” through having a spokesman for that rage, albeit one who is a civic nationalist cul-de-sac.  That is a relaxation of repression, allowing a tiny degree of White identity politics to leak into the mainstream, and, thus, according to Suvorov’s Law, this concession, this tacit legitimization of White Identity, this sign of compromise and of weakness, can eventually lead to further concessions and the crumbling of the System.

On the other hand, if Carlson is an authentic civic nationalist voice, then he contributes to the chaos and balkanization of America (even if unwittingly), and so creates the pressure eventually leading to System concessions. If Carlson is genuine and if his popularity stimulates more System repression, rather than concessions – perhaps even including taking him off the air – that would create even more anger and chaotic balkanization, resulting in even more pressure. In that case, the System may try to hold off trouble by tightening the screws more and more, with more repression, but if Whites keep up the pressure, something has to give. In the end, the System needs Whites, at least for the foreseeable future. If Whites maintain dissatisfaction with the System and the System’s repression of Whites, eventually concessions need to be made, and the Suvorov process will commence.

So, either way – Carlson as controlled opposition or Carlson as authentic civic nationalist – his presence on air is a net positive, particularly from the Suvorovian standpoint.

The key point is for White dissatisfaction to continue and not let up on the pressure. If concessions are granted, continue to be dissatisfied – become even more dissatisfied in fact – and demand more concessions. If repression occurs, keep up the pressure, even if in a passive aggressive manner, until such time that the situation becomes untenable and concessions must be made.

Either way, Tucker has utility. At this point, the utility is sort of irreversible; even if he is taken off the air tomorrow, he has a large cohort of followers who can constitute a nucleus of growing dissatisfaction, if properly led.

More Tucker.