Odds and Ends, 4/12/22

In der news.

Ted’s First Person Account.  We need more accounts about this from other people. Anyone interested can leave comments at my Gab account.

Who is able and willing to oppose Greg Johnson's attempt to ludicrously and destructively redefine "White nationalism" to simply mean a bunch of unconnected, atomized European ethnic nationalisms, which makes the entire concept of "White nationalism" essentially meaningless?

Pierce is long dead. Strom has the right idea about racial nationalism, and can match Johnson for brains, but is trapped in the cul-de-sac of the dead National Alliance and the failed Piercian "Leninist" (as Johnson would term it) approach. Plus, Strom appears hesitant to directly critique other "movement" leaders. Spencer has self-destructed, and never had the mental firepower to match Johnson. Taylor and MacDonald have the brains, but they are old, do not want to confront Johnson, and have other agendas (HBD race realism, HBD Nordicism). Duke is old, lacks the will or ability, and is obsessed with Jews.

The Sallis Groupuscule will do its best with respect to this issue, but with me not being a "movement" "leader," of the "wrong" ethnicity, blacklisted and ignored by Der Movement, whatever arguments I make will be read by a tiny number of people and have very little or any effect - most likely.

Affirmative action has consequences. There isn't anyone in Der Movement with the ability, will, and capability to oppose the destruction of White racial nationalism by the Counter-Currents metastasis.

See this.

Greg JohnsonApril 10, 2022 at 2:49 pm

I obviously don’t advocate white states hating and harming one another: nationalism for me but not for thee. I support the good kind of nationalism, which is a universal form of nationalism in which different nations respect the sovereignty of others as they would have others respect them.

What an evil mendacious fuckwad. That's the guy who suggested war and ethnic cleansing could be a way for European states to interact with each other. Yes, and having scum like Morgan living in other people's countries is respecting "sovereignty."

Compare the comment above with what Greg Johnson previously wrote:

But what would happen if a sovereign European state signed a treaty to host a gigantic Chinese military base? Or if it fell into the hands of plutocrats who started importing cheap non-white labor?... Other states would be perfectly justified in declaring war against the rogue state, deposing the offending regime, and ethnically cleansing its territory. 

Again, he promoted the idea of war and ethnic cleansing between Europeans and then has the nerve to write: "I obviously don’t advocate white states hating and harming one another."

Now, compare his statement that European states that start "importing cheap non-white labor" should be subject to war and ethnic cleansing with this:

I make it very clear that the ethnostate should be considered a right, not an obligation.

The Irish people had every reason and right to their own country. If they destroyed their country through opening up to globalization, that’s hardly a lesson against nationalism. But it was, at least, their mistake to make.

But I thought importing aliens is justification for military invasion and ethnic cleansing? We can see why this guy never debates anyone at a level higher than Jones, Gariepy, or Anglin. Anyone with at least a room temperature IQ could just quote his endless inconsistencies and expose him for the superficial self-unaware jackass he is.