It’s Der Jews

MacDonald vs. Cofnas. In all cases, emphasis added.

See this.  

I will say that both MacDonald and Cofnas should very carefully outline how their respective hypotheses can be falsified. However, I suspect that they'd create an outline designed to make falsification impossible. In any case, MacDonald is so far winning the debate. The evidence of Jewish influence being predominantly on the side of anti-White action is overwhelming.

In a telling comment indicating Jewish leadership of the pro-immigration forces and reflecting the disinterest of other immigrant groups from earlier in the century noted above (Neuringer, 1971: 83), Handlin complained about the apathy of other “hyphenated Americans” in joining the immigration battle. He repeatedly used the term ‘we’—as in “if we cannot beat [Sen. Pat] McCarran and his cohorts with their own weapons, we can do much to destroy the efficacy of those weapons” (4)—suggesting Handlin’s belief in a unified Jewish interest in liberal immigration policy…

Therefore, Southern and Eastern European White ethnics were not involved, in any meaningful way, in over-turning immigration restriction, even when that restriction limited their own numbers. It was the Jews who did it. Who did the Jews have as allies?  The answer:

An important part of this effort was to recruit Senator and future President John F. Kennedy to attach his name to A Nation of Immigrants (1958) and to recruit Senator and future Vice- President and Democratic presidential candidate Hubert Humphrey for his Stranger at Our Gate (1954)…

And, of course, we know the role of Ted Kennedy in the 1965 Immigration Act. Various "Nordish" politicians – both NW European Protestants as well as Irish Catholics - were the junior partners to the Jews in opening the floodgates to Third World immigration.

Moreover, minorities have an advantage in ethnic competition in being more mobilized than majorities (Salter, 2006). Mobilization is the willingness to make sacrifices for a cause, for example, by donating money, time, and labor. Even a small group with limited resources can exercise disproportionate influence when its members are highly mobilized and its opponents, though superior in numbers, are indifferent.

Can the same apply to intra-dissident politics?

Scandinavian societies are the most individualist cultures on Earth…

That MacDonald continues to assert that lie, refuted at my blog, and then cites himself as evidence (!!!), really trashes his reputation as an objective scholar.

Should Jews Be Welcomed in Movements Aimed at White Advocacy?...My view is that Jews should be allowed to join such movements...

The other shoe has dropped.  We should accept Jews now?  This from MacDonald?  Is this part of the “big tent” WN 3.0 agenda?  Gee, I guess even “anti-Semitism” now has to be compatible with “HBD race realism.”

Addendum

See this about intermarriage; that is a reference cited by MacDonald.

Abstract The study of Jewish intermarriage has largely ignored the measurement conventions prevalent in the field of demography such as using first marriages (as opposed to current marriages) and not controlling for mixed parentage. I re-analyze the NJPS 2000–2001 using first marriages and controlling for parentage and find evidence that intermarriage has leveled off among single ancestry Jews. Jewish intermarriage is placed in an American context by (1) putting in Kalmijn’s conceptual schema and (2) using the odds-ratio to compare intermarriage in controlling for group size. Single ancestry Jews are surprisingly endogamous compared with other groups in America. Two new directions for further research in a demographic context are discussed: including non-jewish spouses in population studies and thinking about mixed ancestry Jews in the context of multi-racial persons.

I’ve been saying that for about 20 years now, based on my reading of Alba’s ethnic data. Compared to European-American groups of similar demographic size, American Jews are outmarrying less than would be expected.

Among persons of single Jewish ancestry, however, intermarriage peaks in the period 1980–1989 at 39 % and then decreases to 32 % for the period 1990–2001...

…for comparison among groups odds ratios are preferable because they control for group size (Kalmijn 1998). As Rosenfeld (2008) explains, ‘‘The odds ratio for endogamy is simply the odds of endogamy divided by the odds of exogamy (or outmarriage). An odds ratio of 1 would mean that the category in question had no significance in the marriage market, because the odds of marrying within the group would have to be the same as the odds of marrying someone from outside…

(American) Odds Ratio Data: Negroes – 3525, “pure” Jews – 2085, Asians – 1056, “non-White” Hispanics – 596, “White” Hispanics – 329, ”mixed” Jews – 50

It would have been optimal to have White ethnic data for comparison, but I suppose that there are so few “pure” ethnics in America that this becomes difficult to calculate.  In any case, also note that for Jews, insofar as I know, the vast majority of outmarriage is with White Gentiles. Now, if we consider White ethnic groups, yes, most intermarriage is with other White ethnics, but as stated, they are already mostly mixed. If we consider Whites and Jews as racial groups, then White intermarriage is well distributed among Blacks, Hispanics, Asians, and Jews, while Jewish intermarriage is overwhelmingly with White Gentiles, as far as I am aware (precise data would be welcome). Thus, Jews are not mixing to the extent that they recommend to others.

Kosher Jewish Racialism

The chosen people reveal themselves.  

When reading the material below, remember that Jews have been at the forefront of pushing racial integration on Whites and of promoting miscegenation between Whites, Blacks, and other races.

See this.  Excerpts (emphasis added):

Thousands of years ago, the Rabbis of old recognized that Jewish identity is the key to the survival of Klal Yisrael. To this end, they enacted three sets of food laws to limit socialization: bishul akum, pas akum, and stam yainom (cooked food, bread, and wine prepared by gentiles). This was based on the realization that bonds of friendship are established by eating together, and breaking bread with a stranger is the first step to developing a closer relationship. For thousands of years of exile, the biblical and rabbinic laws of kosher have formed a natural fortress that prevented the assimilation of the Jewish people into many different cultures of the world. Today, with spiraling assimilation wreaking havoc at a frightening rate, the prophetic vision of Chazal is all the more apparent. It is significant that even for secularized Jews, a kosher kitchen often remains the last bastion against intermarriage and assimilation.

The last bastion!  Protect the holy Jewish genepool from contamination from the lowly goyim.

More than two thousand years ago, the Rabbis 1 prohibited eating certain foods cooked 2 by non-Jews in order to limit socialization which might lead to intermarriage between Jews and gentiles.3 This prohibition is known as bishul akum. Food which has a bishul akum status is no more kosher than a sandwich of cold roast beef and cheese,4 even though the ingredients used to prepare the food were initially kosher in and of themselves.

So, kosher law has a strictly racialist foundation, to limit “socialization” with the chosen people and the lowly subhuman goys (i.e., you, dear reader) who live amongst them.  Anything to prevent Jewish intermarriage, while of course Jews promote miscegenation for Whites.

In recent years, with many women entering the workforce, it has become increasingly more prevalent for non-Jewish 5 help to prepare meals while a couple is away from home. Unfortunately, many people are completely unaware that food prepared by a non-Jewish live-in maid or babysitter may not be kosher, and even their utensils, pots and pans may require kosherization.6 

Oy vey!  The “utensils, pots and pans” are contaminated by the sub-human shiksas!  

There is a dispute among the Rishonim (early commentators) whether bishul akum is negated when a Jew contributes to the cooking process by lighting the fire before a non-Jew places a pot of food on the stove, The major codifiers of Jewish law argue this point as well…Alternatively, a Jew may turn on the fire after a non-Jew placed the pot on the cold stove,8 The Rama follows the lenient opinion, and allows a gentile to place raw food on a fire that was ignited by a Jew. Since the Jew has a share in the overall process, the food is, not considered to be bishul akum. 

Completely Middle Eastern, non-Western, and culturally alien.

Food that can be eaten in a raw state is not prohibited when cooked by a non-Jew.13 Since the food is edible without preparation, the consumer feels minimal appreciation to the chef, and eating the food does not engender socialization. 

Please consider the above.  Jews are so hateful and racist against Gentiles that they worry that a Jew eating food cooked by a non-Jew runs the danger of feeling “appreciation to the chef,” and that those normal feelings of human warmth would cause dastardly “socialization.” We let these people control our mass media, and have a disproportionate influence in politics, the economy, academia, etc.  What could go wrong?

What if the gentile cooks food to the point where it is partially edible, but a Jew completes the cooking process? 

What if?  Oh the agony! Great questions of world history!

One of the most fascinating applications of the halachos of bishul akum is with respect to the processing of fish. This is a broad topic, and to discuss it properly we must distinguish between three categories of processed fish: cold smoked fish, hot smoked fish and canned fish.

Very fascinating indeed!  A "broad topic" that requires much discussion.

Various poskim have argued against the light bulb system. When a Jew adds a wood chip to a fire, it is rendered aish yisrael because the Jew is instrumental in preparing and intensifying the fire. In contrast, a light bulb remains separate and distinct from the fire, and the Jew is not a contributor to the primary source of heat. Others have raised another interesting objection. Electric companies typically change the source of power from one generator to another. Even if a Jew installs a light bulb, it would no longer be considered a fire of a Jew if the generator was subsequently changed by the electric company. In halachic terminology, this is referred to as kolu lo chitzov (his arrows – i.e. his action – has ended). The OU does not subscribe to the light bulb system…

You know, Yockey was 100% right when he drew a sharp line separating Jews from the West. Read the above.  Read all of it. There isn’t the slightest overlap between Jews and Judaism on the one hand, and Western civilization on the other. When talking about the Jews, we refer to a non-Western, Middle Eastern, Magian people, completely incompatible in every way with the West and with Western peoples and their civilization.

Food is a double-edged sword. While nutritious food provides basic sustenance and energy, spoiled food can have a devastating and even fatal effect on the human body. This same dichotomy is equally true for the spiritual dimension of man. Food consumed in conformity with the laws of the Torah elevates and sanctifies, while non-kosher food destroys and defiles the Jewish soul. On both levels, it’s not only what’s in the food that matters, but how it’s prepared as well. Indeed, we are playing with fire.

If a Jew eats food prepared by, or even looked at, a non-Jew, the Jewish soul will be defiled!  Indeed...playing with fire!  The fire of...ovens?  

What kosher problem may be obviated by using a touch-tone phone?

Please remind me again how the Jewish people are in any way even remotely connected to Western civilization?  I know they’re HuWhite, but still….

3 Intermarriage is the reason cited by Taz , Yoreh Daya 113:7, based on Tosofoth. Avodah Zora, 38a. Rashi in Avodah Zora (ibid), maintains that the Rabbis restricted socialization to prevent the inadvertent consumption of non-kosher food….

There it is. Kosher laws are designed as part of a Jewish racialist approach to avoid intermarriage. Got to keep that bloodline pure!  Meanwhile, anyone who objects to White-Black intermarriage is a racist hater and a Nazi, and we must all take action against that!

10…Similarly, if the pilot light of a home stove is prone to go out regularly, there is no guarantee that the non-Jew will not relight it when the residents are away from home.

OK, just let the gas continue to leak.  But then, isn’t that…gassing Jews?  

11 A separate issue that must be dealt with when non-Jewish help is left alone in a house is the concern that they may use the kitchen utensils to prepare non-kosher food. See Yoreh Daya 118:12 and Igros Moshe Vol. 1,61.

Oh no!  The non-Jewish help may actually – gasp! – touch the utensils!  

16 Source: Rabbi Yisrael Belsky. Yechava Daas suggests another reason to permit donuts cooked by a non-Jew. Donuts are boiled in oil. There are two opinions cited in Orach Chaim 168:13, whether boiled dough products are considered “bread”. With respect to the appropriate brachah, we follow the lenient opinion and recite borei minai mezonos, since brachos are a Rabbinic institution. However, with respect to bishul akum, which is also a Rabbinic decree, we assume they are “bread.” As noted later in this article, there are no bishul akum restrictions on bread items.

Eat your donuts, Moshe!  

23 Instant potatoes are fully cooked before they are dehydrated and made into flakes or powder. Nonetheless, Rav Belsky related from Rav Elyashuv, shlita, that they are permitted, based on the Avkas Rochel, quoted in the Yad Efraim, Yoreh Daya, 113:12, that food cooked by a non-Jew which was rendered inedible by dehydration and then was re-cooked by a Jew is not prohibited because of bishul akum. This same reasoning of the Avkas Rochel applies to instant potatoes which are prepared with hot water. Rabbi Belsky pointed out that this is the case only if instant potatoes cannot be made with cold water, and this assumption should be regularly re-examined.

Madness.

32 Nonetheless, there are those who disagree with the Pri Chodosh and prohibit coffee, tea or chocolate that were brewed by a gentile. See, for example, Pishchai Teshuva, 114:1, who cites Ponim Meiros that the reasoning of Tosafoth (that beer is permissible because the majority is water) is not the accepted halachah. See also the responsa of Shevet HaLevi, Vol. 2,44.

No Starbucks for you, Moshe!  Oy vey!  It’s a holocaust!

All of that reads like some sort of anti-Semitic caricature written by a Nutzi. Unfortunately, it's all too real.

They Don’t Understand How Science Works

Misunderstanding about science.  And other news.

The outrageous hypocrisy of Greg Johnson.  Re: this.  Johnson should do us all a favor and prune himself.

Granted, there is much to question here.  At this point, Trump’s instincts are possibly  better than Fauci’s. We’ll see. But, let’s be honest here – Fauci has always cast doubt and skepticism on the veracity of the models; in press conferences, he always stressed that the models are only as good as the assumptions that went into building them, and the data used.

True enough, Fauci’s recommendations are not in synch with the evolution of the model predictions.  But he’s not a politician, and the decision of what to do is a political decision. It’s the same in warfare in American history; a general can make recommendations, but the President makes the ultimate decision. The most important point is that Fauci made very clear, multiple times, that the models are just the best “guesstimate” for a given snapshot in time.

The problem ultimately is that Der Movement – including and especially its HBD faction – does not understand how science works. They misunderstand the whole process.  They do not seem to grasp hypothesis testing, the culture of skepticism, the need to question, the rejection of dogma, the whole scientific method of applied empiricism. They see only black and white, and not the shades of gray that constitute the scientific enterprise.

True enough, there are some things we can be reasonably certain of. The Earth revolves around the sun and not vice versa. The sun is not a giant burning lump of coal, but rather generates energy through nuclear fusion. Very well.  But such things are the exceptions that prove the rule; they are the small islands of (more or less) established fact floating in a great sea of uncertainty. The details about a novel virus are going to be part of that uncertainty. Thus, if the models are wrong, then that’s because of flawed assumptions, insufficient data, and/or perhaps the models were incomplete.  It does not mean that the experts are all stupid or mendacious or that there is a conspiracy, a hoax, and/or some dastardly cabal manipulating public perceptions so that “Jew doctors” can “sodomize our babies with toxic microchipped vaccine needles” and “give them autism.”

Indeed, one wonders if the models incorporated changes in viral virulence. If the models of mitigation only considered transmission, in the context of fixed virulence, then certainly death rates could be over-estimated.  If the mitigation, by inhibiting transmission, selects for a less virulent viral strain, that can explain much. Note that the places heavily hit (so far) – the Wuhan area of China, Iran, Italy, Spain, New York – were places in which the virus was able to spread unimpeded for a significant period of time before serious mitigation was enforced. Other areas that initiated mitigation early – even if less stringent like Sweden – put barriers up to transmission and this exerted selective pressures on the virus. Granted, some data (e.g., Washington State) don’t neatly fit the pattern, but it is a hypothesis that can be tested.  Maybe it’s wrong.  Who knows?  But you cannot jump to “it’s a hoax!” just because the modeling was inaccurate or incomplete.

Note as well that this blog never championed full lockdowns or a shutdown of the entire economy- (nor did it oppose them. My criticism of China Plague deniers and minimalizers has always been with their lies and distortions – not about policy recommendations per se. True, I am more on the side of prudence, but one should be willing to listen to arguments in favor of lesser restrictions if those arguments are made in good faith and with available data and with an understanding of science. Hysteria about “the predictions were off, it’s just a cold, a hoax to implant microchips” does not suffice. Making Fauci into some sort of cackling Bond villain also does not suffice as an argument. Note as well that some of the minimalizers were willing to “open up the economy” even if the original predictions were true – but they were not consistent, shifting between that view and the “it’s an over-stated hoax” position. If we assume that Italy and New York, etc. represent the outcome if the virus was allowed to spread unimpeded (before the necessary steps were taken), then the threat was not over-stated. What has happened to hard hit areas should dissuade sane individuals from talking about a “hoax.”

The problem is that HBD and the fetishists, etc. do "science" by starting with the conclusion that they want to be true, and then work backwards to cherry pick and/or distort and misinterpret data to fit their preconceived, dogmatic conclusion. Facts that don't fit are ignored, misinterpreted, or unjustifiably discredited. They believe everyone doing real science behaves the same way; therefore, any changes, errors, honest misinterpretations, controversies, etc. are chalked up to either conspiracies or gross incompetence. The idea that hypotheses are being tested, data interpreted, hypotheses rejected or modified, and uncertainty and debate about findings exist, is anathema to them.

Excellent Salter presentation from 2010.

The TROPICAL world of COLOR once again complains about White racism.

The existential meaning of Asians is hatred of Whites.

Even liberals are not allowed to criticize The Holy Orientals in the slightest. When were the Chinese elevated to godhood?  Inquiring minds want to know.

How long will we be in lockdown?  Milady does some epidemiological modeling.  Oh no wait, that’s men who are doing that.

Read this.  That’s bad enough.  But Derbyshire promotes the idea of Whites race-mixing with the bizarre, tropical, incredibly alien dog-eating aliens who inflicted the coronavirus plague on humanity.  If White-Iranian miscegenation is a crime, then what can we say about White-Chinese?  

See this.  Remember when I discussed how the American scientific establishment was taken over by Asians and that they indulge in ethnic nepotism to target grant funding to their co-ethnics? The NIH chickens come home to roost.

Laugh at this.

For Easter dinner, I had a glass of red wine, a pizza, and a slice of cheesecake. Regardless of my location, it has become a tradition for me.

Important ideological considerations, no doubt.

In 2018, I was living in Ukraine and was getting to know a woman from an online dating site.

This specimen is an ethnic Dane.  Thus, he was living in someone else’s nation, taking their women.  Eastern Europe as a bordello for the Quota Queen crew.  Ethnonationalism!

American sailor murdered by China.  America’s response: Nothing.

Dear god…what a lineup of horrors.  Empiricist quotient of zero.

And somewhere, someplace, a sweaty Andrew Fraser ejaculates.  An Irish response.  I was amused by the (correct) diagnosis of narcissism.  Back in the Legion Europa days I coined the term Self Absorbed Ethnic Narcissism (SAEN), a disorder that is particularly developed among certain European subraces and ethnic groups - interestingly enough, the same ones that pat themselves on the back about how “individualist” and “disinterested” they are.  Indeed, they are very ethnocentric in celebrating their lack of ethnocentrism! The absence of self-awareness is almost comical.

Rewriting Hood, Wolff, and Kersey.

Less accurate:

More than 12 million immigrants came through Ellis Island from 1892 to 1954. Almost all were white, though many were Italian, Eastern European, Jewish, or otherwise different from the Northern Europeans who founded the United State

More accurate

More than 12 million immigrants came through Ellis Island from 1892 to 1954. Some were white, such as the Italian and Eastern European immigrants, although many were Jewish aliens.  All were different from the British colonists who founded the United States.  Earlier Northern European immigrants, such as Irish, German, and Scandinavian, were also different from the British colonists who founded the United States, albeit different to a lesser degree. However, Irish immigration was strongly opposed by nativist elements, and individuals such as Ben Franklin frowned on (non-Saxon) German immigrants and considered everyone except for the English and Saxons as “tawny” and “swarthy.”

Ben Franklin (emphasis added):

Which leads me to add one Remark: That the Number of purely white People in the World is proportionally very small. All Africa is black or tawny. Asia chiefly tawny. America (exclusive of the new Comers) wholly so. And in Europe, the Spaniards, Italians, French, Russians and Swedes, are generally of what we call a swarthy Complexion; as are the Germans also, the Saxons only excepted, who with the English, make the principal Body of White People on the Face of the Earth.

“Race realists” like the Amren crew are dishonest by nature.

Meet Der Right. Summarized: Religious, anti-science, conspiracy-obsessed, delusional, anti-empiricist, and hypocritical.  Hypocrisy: You see, they are all for “freedom” but when that “freedom” conflicts with their religion (e.g., abortion, physician-assisted suicide, etc.) then all of a sudden the power of the state comes crashing down on you.  Both leftists and traditionalist rightists are filth.  Only Type II futurist rightists have integrity.