Odds and Ends, 4/8/22

In der news.

First Sallis Groupuscule blog post.

The real purpose of good fiction – ranging from an epic novel (or movie) down to a short story or even a high quality comic book – is to induce reflection on the nature of realty and on the human condition, and to ponder how that affects one’s view of past, present, and/or future. Certainly it can be, and indeed should be, entertaining, but if fiction is merely entertaining than it is no better than a sitcom.

Ted Sallis translation services:

Man cave = place of refuge from nagging harridan

Wife = nagging harridan

Biological clock ticking = woman wants man as a sperm donor and as a beta male provider

Defending your woman’s honor = let’s you and him fight

Female hypergamy = alpha fux

Marriage = beta bux

Happy marriage = fiction

So, CNN has no problem talking about an "authoritarian" leader being re-elected. That's likely a more honest election than what we have here in the USA, and reflects the will of the Hungarian people, but Orban is "authoritarian." What do we call Western European nations that ban free speech, ban political parties, and throw people in jail for tweets? Is that "liberal democracy?"

A rare useful Amren article.  Cue the retards in the comments telling us that conspiracies are real. Napalm and mustard gas!

A rare useful Amren comment:

Someguy

Oliver, I am not trying to claim anyone is on par or better than anyone else. I'm really highlighting the under-performing nature of East Asia. I'm pretty sure the Islamic golden age has more mathematicians than China ever had. The point is that an overfeminine race that thinks extremely holistically and is ultra conformist is ultimately entirely useless in adding to any sort of technological progress at a macro scale. I was shocked that Daxing airport was designed by an Iraqi woman. It shows that in all of China there is not one person creative enough to design such a thing.

HBDers weep bitter tears.

What Der Movement fails to realize about milady Marine is that winning by itself (assuming she does win) does nothing to validate the mainstreaming approach. It is only winning combined with useful action while in office that would constitute some validation. Now, if a hardcore explicit racial nationalist was elected, I would say that the victory itself would be of disruptive value, but Skullface Marine is hardly a Nutzi, is she? And, by the way, even if mainstreaming was ever validated (at least once), that does nothing to disprove that farstreaming is a superior approach, with more proven success.

My attitude toward Der Movement is akin to what Nixon's is here, re: the press.