The Creativity Gambit

Religion.

Sociopolitical opinion and ideology does not define a “protected class” in America, leaving White nationalists and others on the Right vulnerable to social pricing and other forms of persecution.

This, of course, needs to be remedied by law, and I have previously proposed such a law. However, no such protections currently exist.

Religion, however, is a protected class.  Could WNs utilize religion as a vehicle to shield their beliefs from official persecution?  Creativity, for example – and there are other race-based and race-aware fringe religions (for Whites or some subsection of Whites) as well.

The System of course may simply refuse acknowledge the validity of such religions, and attempts have been made for such invalidation.  The legal findings have been a mixed bag but the favorable rulings suggest the religion gambit may be worth trying, but of course activist judges and the System in general may still continuously attempt to define religion in a manner so as to exempt anything pro-White.

One can argue that religions such as Christian Identity, Asatru, and Cosmotheism may reflect a concern for the “imponderables” more so than Creativity and therefore may be better for challenging System refusal to accept the validity of such beliefs as protected.  New religions (EGI-based? The Church of the Holy Salter?) can also be developed that would be fully compatible with White nationalism while dealing with so-called “imponderables.”  This might be best as all existing racial religions are seriously flawed and it is embarrassing to be openly affiliated with them; however, it is worth considering all options.  

Of course, the definition of utility of “imponderables” to define religion should itself by challenged.  Who decides what an “imponderable issue” is?  Are kosher and halal dietary laws “imponderables?”  They sound very secular and practical to me. Is the Muslim dislike of dogs an “imponderable?”  What about the Hindu caste system?  How is that related to deep moral and ethical issues?  The reality is that religion is for the most part a technic for controlling human behavior, dressed up (in some cases) with a lot of supernatural mumbo jumbo and in most cases with hypocritical cant and in virtually all cases with arbitrary dictums. Creativity (and other race based religions) are certainly no worse and in some cases clearly better. Any religion that helps preserve EGI would seem to be on a higher ethical plane than, say, a ban on eating pork.

I am not recommending this for everyone - for example, I am not a religious person and I have very serious problems with all of the aforementioned extant racial religions.  However, I cam imagine that Type I activists would find much of that very congenial.  If so, why not attempt to take advantage of possible religious protections?

If all else fails, there is always the Church of the Almighty Bomb and the Holy Fallout.