The Unvarnished Truth about Recent Events
El Paso: Ideology vs. terrorism.
See this. And this.
See this.
And also this.
This is the reality: Only at EGI Notes will you hear the unvarnished truth about these events. You will certainly not hear it from the System, with its hypocritical moral posturing and hysterical virtue signaling. You will not hear it from a self-serving and inept “movement” either.
See this. And this.
See this.
And also this.
This is the reality: Only at EGI Notes will you hear the unvarnished truth about these events. You will certainly not hear it from the System, with its hypocritical moral posturing and hysterical virtue signaling. You will not hear it from a self-serving and inept “movement” either.
Truth: These events are basically cries for help, cries of desperation from White men who have been dumped on by the System and shit upon by society, men who believe, with justification, that their interests cannot be advanced through the political process, men who feel abandoned by everyone, including by a comically inept “movement” that has failed them time and again and that offers them nothing except disaster, defeat, and humiliation.
The reaction to these events, from both the System and the “movement,” will do nothing but legitimize and amplify these feelings, will do nothing except increase the alienation of these people, will do nothing except make more events like what we have seen more likely.
More White men, particularly the youth, will observe the universal cries of condemnation of Whites, White interests, and everything these men stand for. More will become radicalized. There will be zero – ZERO – calls for any understanding of these men, or concern about “backlash” – concern that always occurs with terror attacks by non-Whites. The System, already hostile to White interests, will become more hostile. The political process, closed off to expressions of White interests, will become more closed off. The desperation and alienation of these men will be mocked, ridiculed, and labeled “evil.” Meanwhile, the “movement” will take no responsibility for having failed these men, and will react with self-serving podcasts and blog posts (perhaps with tin cup rattling for “D’Nations”); endorsements of Princess Tulsi Coconut and Andy Eggroll; and discussions about cephalic indices, racial admixture in Southern and Eastern Europe, Savitri Devi and Kali Yuga, and all the rest of the retarded stupidity that results in concerned young men realizing that the tragicomedy of “American White nationalism” has nothing to offer to them.
The validity of this truth will be confirmed by three facts:
1. There will be not a single mainstream politician or any other prominent person who will publicly declare that these unfortunate events occur because the System is hostile to White interests and desperate people believe that these interests cannot be addressed via the political process. No one from the mainstream will state that we need to incorporate White interests – White racial interests – into public policy discussion.
2. There will be no pro-White “movement leader” who will be given a fair, respectful, and reasoned forum to explain these issues to the public, followed by a sincere and authentic consideration of these issues and their implications.
3. No pro-White “movement leader” will publicly accept responsibility and accountability for endless failure, this failure leading activists feeling so desperate that they lash out in a destructive manner.
You know this to be true, right?
Let’s consider System hypocrisy in all of this, and the confusion between beliefs and actions, a confusion that exists only when applied to beliefs that promote White interests. Remember congressional hearings about “White supremacism” and comments by Presidential candidates about the so-called dangers of “White nationalism.”
There’s a difference between an ideology, a belief system (that can include religion) and terrorism that may be related to that ideology. From a law enforcement, legal, and public safety standpoint, the issue has to be with actions and with people and groups who plan and commit those actions, not with underlying ideologies that are assumed, or professed, to be the alleged impetus for those actions.
Some examples will suffice. Assume a person or group attacks an abortion clinic based on professed Christian belief. We may call the actors terrorists and the acts terrorism, but what public figure would then proceed to call Christianity itself terrorism? When Muslims commit terrorism, the System is careful to distinguish between the terrorists and the religion that they practice. When leftists were committing terrorist outrages in 1960s and 1970s America on a regular basis, Marxist professors were allowed to promote their ideology on American campuses. Even when people like Ted Cruz are pushing (with justification) for Antifa to be declared a terrorist group, they refer to that informal organization and its adherents, and the actions they plan and perform. These conservatives are NOT labeling Marxism or Anarchism as terrorism.
In every case, a clear distinction is made between an ideology, a belief system, a religion, and anyone or any group committing terrorism ostensibly on behalf of those memetic systems.
Now we have people screeching about “White nationalist” and “White supremacist” terrorism. Of course, a clear distinction between beliefs and acts is NOT being made in this case. That’s not surprising because the entire raison d’etre of the System is hatred of Whites and repression of White interests. The “Great Replacement” is not a “conspiracy theory” but demonstrative fact; even the United Nations openly calls for “replacement migration.” And The Great Replacement is a major objective of the System; thus, do you expect them to be honest about dissidents to this objective? One should not be surprised by the hypocrisy and double standards here – random “lone wolf” attacks (with NO underlying organizational structure behind them) are being used to smear an ideology, while in all the previous cases, where the connection between ideology and terrorist organization is much more developed, the underlying ideologies were always left sacrosanct.
Thus, Antifa is a terrorist organization based on Marxist and anarchist beliefs, which themselves are not being labeled as terrorism, or even any sort of danger to America. To be consistent, if any WN organization exists that plans and executes acts of political violence, then such an organizing is terrorist, but the underlying ideology is not. Lone wolf attackers are terrorists, but whatever belief system they profess is not. An alleged “free society” like America must make distinctions between belief and action.
This by no means takes Der Movement off the hook for its stupidity. But that stupidity is not criminal, it is not terrorism, it is something to be adjudicated internally, by the rank-and-file abandoning the failed “leadership” and abandoning the failed dogmas.
Once again, I’m calling out Der Movement. It is NOT – repeat NOT – true that “movement” rhetoric is promoting such actions. Instead, I posit that “movement” ineptitude can make people frustrated and they develop the feeling that “acting out” is their only option. If there was a real movement that could absorb the activist energies of young White men and put those energies to good use, these things would not happen. Instead we have a “movement leadership” consisting of retards, perverts, grifters, and incompetent affirmative action cases. We have "leaders" that refuse to fully accept responsibility for their failures.
Laughably self-unaware. Rewritten:
I blame Greg Johnson and the other Quota Queens for the #ElPasoTerroristAttack. If they had built a viable movement and stopped the litany of endless failure, Patrick Crusius would not have committed this desperate act.Repeating the same post over and over again with different names and locations filled in doesn’t deal with the situation. It doesn’t address the fundamental issue of responsibility and accountability for failures more long-standing than those of Trump. Is this “leadership?”
And – coming back to the System - the politicians denouncing “White nationalism” actually are promoting, not inhibiting, further violence, as they leave desperate Whites with the impression that there is no hope for promoting their interests through the political process. People have given up viewing the System as legitimate and have given up on any chances of reform. All of the moral posturing and virtue signaling is increasing the chances of the very thing they ostensibly oppose and denounce.
Basically, it all boils down to this - young White men are increasingly giving up on the System as they do not believe that their interests can be advanced through participation in the political process. They are also giving up on the idea that their interests can be advanced by the retards, perverts, morons, and grifters that make up Der Movement. No one is offering real solutions to this problem. The System’s “solutions” will only make it worse (intentionally?). Der Movement is incapable of offering any real solutions. This problem will not go away. Expect more such tragedies. Expect to hear the truth only at this blog and nowhere else.
Labels: affirmative action in action, Counter Currents, Greg Johnson, hypocrisy, movement, Old Movement, revolutionary violence, terrorism, white nationalism
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home