The Moral Responsibility for Buffalo

Here we go again.

We once again observe an explosion of Type I retardation, this time in Buffalo, and we observe the boringly repetitive boilerplate “movement” response. The same tired imbecility repeats itself over and over again.

Based on current available data, the only person legally responsible for this event is the shooter (assuming an eventual conviction). What about moral responsibility (apart from the shooter himself)? Certainly, a large portion of moral responsibility lies with the System/Left, which creates, maintains, and enforces the anti-White infrastructure and culture of America. That is obvious. That is what ultimately provokes outbursts such as this. The Mainstream Right also has moral responsibility, as they are part of the same System, are complicit in the anti-White structures of American society, and represent a fake opposition to the Left.  

However, and this must be emphasized, there is also considerable moral responsibility further to the right – right-wing populists (e.g., Trump), the Far Right (e.g., Der Movement), as well as the gray area in between (e.g., the Alt Lite). And this moral responsibility is NOT for the reasons that the lying System/Left claims – e.g., “The Right creates, promotes, legitimizes, and encourages hatred and violence” – since Der Right does NOT want these violent events to happen and indeed responds negatively to such events, which are certainly not promoted or encouraged by Der Right. Indeed, Der Right constantly attacks the idea of using violence, and instead counsels its followers to "give donations" or "buy books" or "vote for Trump" or other such cul-de-sacs of "activity." Instead, the opposite is more true, these events occur not because Der Right is so successful (in “promoting hate”) but because Der Right is so unsuccessful in everything that it actually does, so dishonest, so betraying, so contemptuous, and so utterly useless that it makes vulnerable Whites disillusioned and depressed, and makes them feel that the only thing they can do to make a difference is to last out with violence. 

How (more specifically) does Der Right disillusion people so badly that they explode in this manner?

White people voted for Trump in the hope that finally someone in power would defend, even if just implicitly, White American interests. What they got instead was the Kardashian/West prison reform for Blacks, the Jack Johnson pardon, a bizarre diplomatic spat with Sweden in defense of Black rapper ASAP Rocky, endless talk about “Black unemployment rates,” and empty tweets of “Law and Order!” as America burned in the spring and summer of 2020.

Der Movement and the Alt Lite talk big, and promise victory, but instead exhibit endless failure and humiliation, as they lurch from one catastrophe to another. The collapse of the Alt Right is just a recent example of decades-long failure. They then add to that negative record by always rattling the tin cup; the pro-White Right is, in my opinion, composed of money-hungry grifters more concerned with their bank accounts than with achieving any success for their people. Vulnerable Whites, particularly disenfranchised and disgruntled young White men, are told that giving money is important and will lead to victory. Instead, what they actually observe is this support allowing one Quota Queen to go to movies, allegedly travel Europe with young men in tow, and allegedly engage in a bizarre incident in a European men's room; another Quota Queen to grow a porn star moustache while waxing eloquent over the merits of high-IQ Asians; and yet another Quota Queen to maintain his lustrous head of hair and receive CEO-level “executive compensation.” Then there is the Grand King of the Alt Lite who receives supporter money while describing an aging Filipina as “Mommy.”

Confronted with all of that, immature and weak-minded people become disillusioned, depressed, and lash out with violence.

If there was an authentic, honest, honorable, and successful Far Right then there would likely not be such a build-up of dashed hopes and frustrated disillusionment that the pressure needs to be vented by unfortunate bursts of acting out.

Actually, the “successful” is I believe not even necessary (although of course desirable) – the other components alone could be sufficient to prevent these types of events. The Sallis Groupuscule is certainly (currently) not successful at all, but let us consider what it preaches:

• 1. The situation is very grim; there is no attempt to foster illusion with false hopes.
• 2. A strategic plan is proposed, since although the situation is grim there is still a slight possibility of success if things are done correctly.
• 3. Regardless of the outcome, the first priority for our people, especially the young, is to take care of themselves first – their health, their families, their careers, their economic viability, and their personal self-fulfillment. Only once you have solidified your own life should you engage in sane and legal productive activism.

The Sallis Groupuscule may not be exciting, may not get many “page views,” is not part of “the good old boys network,” but the memes promoted by the Sallis Groupuscule lead to an acceptance of reality, long-range planning, and people building productive lives to “ride the tiger” while hoping one day to (legally, politically) destroy the tiger.

In contrast, Der Right lies to its followers that victory is certain and inevitable, proposes “plans” that conflate to endless fundraising and utter failure with respect to actual real-world White advocacy, and encourages followers to be downwardly mobile and make sacrifices for the “movement.” These memes are tailor-made to lead to disillusionment, dashed hopes, and despair.  This leads to the moral responsibility for events like the Buffalo shooting.

Der Movement’s “leaders” view themselves as swan-like angelic Eloi; in actuality, they are morally deformed monsters.

They disgust me and they should disgust you as well.

The Left Understands Suvorov's Law

The Left is always more politically astute than the Retarded Right (or, to be more succinct, the Right).

See this.

Remember Suvorov's Law - Revolutions typically do not occur during the time of greatest repression, but when that repression is suddenly relaxed.

That Law - supported by many historical examples, such as the French Revolution, the Bolshevik Revolution, the Fascist and Nazi takeovers of Italy and Germany respectively, the fall of the USSR, the constant victories of the Left in post-WWII America as "conservatives" continuously capitulate - is in complete contrast to the "worse is better" fantasies of Der Right, particularly of Der Movement.

A strategy to achieve revolutionary change based on Suvorov's Law is to aim for a relaxation of repression by pressuring the dominant System, putting the System in an untenable position so that they have no choice but to grant concessions and legitimize your agenda, while, at the same time (and this is crucial), never being satisfied with the concessions and constantly pressuring for more and more. As the System loses legitimacy, in direct relationship to your side gaining legitimacy, and as you heighten the contradictions (particularly by both demonstrating the political and moral bankruptcy of the System by forcing them to concede to your positions while simultaneously enraging and provoking supporters of the System and the System's ideology), your position gets stronger and more of your target audience in the population comes over to your side. A number of strategies can be used to pressure the System, and I won't get into that here, but the general strategy is clear.

On the opposite side, a strategy to prevent revolutionary change based on Suvorov's Law is to deny the opposition any concessions, deny them any legitimacy, maintain or heighten the repression, to cow, to intimidate, hostile elements in the population, and enhance the morale of the System's supporters.

It is clear that the current Left-Globalist "woke" System has some understanding of Suvorov's Law. Whether this is conscious and explicit or unconscious and implicit I do not know, but the System behaves in a manner consistent with a general understanding of the basic principle.

The System maintains and increases repression (e.g., calling on the FBI to intimidate White parents at school board meetings reaches new heights of totalitarian reach) and refuses to grant the opposition any legitimacy whatsoever. And the Left goes from one victory to another.  At the same time, whenever the Left wants to advance its agenda - and how they attained power to begin with - is to pressure the Right (as they did in the past and in any circumstance today where anyone on the Right has any power whatsoever to any degree, no matter how small) into making one concession after another. The Left uses, and has used, Suvorov's Law perfectly - they leverage pressuring for concessions and legitimacy, weakening the opposition to the point that the opposition collapses and revolutionary change is possible, while at the same time, refusing any concessions to their own opposition and meeting resistance (no matter how weak) with over-the-top repression.

If "worse is better" really worked, then the Left should be losing big time, but they are not, and have not. They are winning and have been winning for a long, long time. It are the fantasy-mongers of Der Right, who cling to "worse is better," who are constantly losing big time. The Right as a whole has consistently ignored Suvorov's Law, applied approaches completely opposed to that law, and so they lose time and time again.

Worse is not better. Worse is worse. The Left is making our situation worse and the Left is winning.

Reversing that trend will require a complete re-think of strategy.

Worse is Better Yet Again

Another (brief) foray into this topic.

In The Turner Diaries, Pierce makes the cogent point that a major objective of revolutionary violence (besides making the System look weak) is to provoke repressive measures by the System so as to alienate and radicalize the population. 

It says something about human nature that the population wouldn't simply blame the rebels for instigating the situation - most people are shallow and focus on immediate causes; further, if revolutionary violence depends on support from a fraction of the population, then one can assume that elements of the population were already displeased with the System even before the increased repression, and would thus be very willing to blame the System, rather than the rebels, for ultimately creating the problems.

But how does the historical truth about revolutionary violence stack up against Suvorov's Law - that revolutions tends to occur when repression is suddenly relaxed, not when the repression is the greatest?  And what about my own support for a strategy based on Suvorov's Law?

First, even if the repression increases, typically peaking at some point, as long as the rebellion continues, the System may make an attempt to compromise, so the two aspects of revolutionary change are not always incompatible. Typically, Suvorov's Law activity follows a period of the worse is better repressive scenario. Second, in those cases in which the two strategies are completely separate, choosing one or another depends upon circumstances. If the population is not supportive of revolutionary violence, if there is no effective organization for such violence, if there is no way of using force to overthrow a System, then Suvorov's Law comes - or should come - into play. Under other circumstances, such as a System disintegrating due to other pressures and ripe for physical overthrow, widespread support for armed rebellion, a situation in which the System is "boiling the frog" so slowly that radical intervention is required to disrupt the status quo, then the "twigs and branches" "to the mountains" armed struggle approach may be more reasonable.

EGI Notes does not support armed struggle in our current situation, and all of the Grand Poobahs of "movement" "leadership" seem to agree, with their denouncing of violence (assuming their sincerity) and emphasis on "metapolitics" (the fact that some of these "leaders" still focus on worse is better Der Tag "the System is about to collapse" scenarios tells you how incoherent their "strategy" is). Very well. There is not yet any real significant support for "twigs and branches" Der Tag scenarios, and there is no organization for that, no chance for success.

Thus, I - who at least offers a coherent strategy, whether you think it right or wrong - promote the Suvorov's Law approach. The danger of "safety valve" complacency after System concessions is fought against with a vanguard elite that constantly stirs the pot - there should be endless demands, one should never be satisfied, every concession by the System should be met with a set of fresh demands, new outrage, and more militancy. The Left has radically transformed America with this strategy. When has the Left ever been satisfied with any concession over the last, say, 60 years? Never. Every surrender by the Right, by the old traditional System, every compromise and concession, was met with screams for yet more, endless demands, endless anger, leading to new cycles of surrender, concession, compromise, and leftist victory. There was never any "storming of the ramparts" by the Left; America was just given to them, piece by piece.  They never had the support of the people for armed insurrection, nor did they have the organization and power to take on the government. They seized power nevertheless.

Is the Far Right paying attention?

Prelude to War

Faye.

Note: I had written this about a week ago and have been waiting to post it at the appropriate time. I note that Andrew Joyce has also just written a review of this book and makes some similar points. So, hopefully these two reviews, coming out at the same time, will provide to you a solid understanding of Faye's book.

See this. Prelude to War is an older Faye book I had not previously read; it has an Introduction by von Hoffmeister.

Some notes on the book and related issues follow.

The writing style the book is not very good; however, I cannot determine if this is in the original French text, due to the translation, or both. However, it is meant to be a polemic and not an erudite analysis (of the kind Faye despises, see below), so content should be deemed more important here than style. At the border between content and style is the mind-numbing repetition in the work; the same ideas are repeated over and over again, until the reader’s eyes glaze over and they start skimming the relevant passages. The book could have used considerable further editing; it needed to be “blue-penciled” and thus shortened with the elimination of redundant sections.

With respect to the Introduction (and then Faye’s comments about the Jews), I’ve had some disagreements with von Hoffmeister (see here), but, in general, I agree with him on most things, much of the major issues. However, I don’t really agree with von Hoffmeister and Faye, re: Jews, but on the other hand, I also reject some of the extremist paranoid ideation and purity spiraling in the “movement” concerning “the Jewish question.”

I think that the best way to view the Jews is that they are a people different from Whites (European-descended peoples), with different interests, and that the Jews recognize this, act on it, and due to their intelligence, ethnocentrism, and influence, they do great damage to Whites as Jews actualize their perception of Jewish interests. Whether or not Jews (in general) superficially identify as “White” (“fellow White people”), they do not see themselves as White in the same way Europeans are.  Thus, when Jews act in a manner inimical to White interests, they view it as something that they (the Jews) are doing to “them” (Whites) in order to benefit themselves (Jews). Trends that harm Whites are generally viewed by Jews as being positive or negative strictly based on how those trends affect Jews – “is it good for the Jews?” Jews see themselves as a distinct group and if they prosper in a world in which Whites are being destroyed, well, then, those Whites need to be destroyed. Many Jews do have an animus to Whites and Western civilization, which makes it easier for them to harm us to benefit themselves. One does not need to invoke a vast, well-coordinated, tightly organized global historical conspiracy – the emergent behavior of the Jewish community actualizes from these differences of identity and of interests.

Faye’s comment that Jews will eventually become irrelevant in the future is, even if true, itself irrelevant – what matters is what the Jews are doing now and what they have done in the past. If Jews become irrelevant in the future, but, if, before then, they help to destroy the White race and Western civilization, then who cares? Is it possible for Faye to be so stupid?

Faye advocates solidarity between pagans (such as himself) and traditional Christians in the battle against the Islamists. Likewise, we all should advocate pan-European solidarity against the rising tide of color; Nordicists and other fetishists, ethnonationalists, religions dogmatic freaks, HBDers, and all rest, who divide Whites and weaken White resistance against Color, are traitors, Culture Retarders, and absolute pieces of filth. Faye makes clear that he considers Islam, and the Rising Tide of Color more generally, to be the enemy of Europe and the West, with America being a mere adversary. This differs from Yockey’s perspective, but Yockey was taking a mid-20th century view of the American-Soviet, which is quite different from the early 21st century perspective of Faye’s work in this book.

While I obviously agree with what Faye has to say in this book, at least in general terms, I note that he was yet another European rightist totally ignorant of the realities of contemporary America (despite his delusions to the contrary), whose “thoughts” and “ideas” about America were decades out-of-date. I’ve written about this issue before. It’s always 1910 or 1920 in America to these European nationalists. And what to make of Faye’s stupid jibe of White Americans as “cowboy-rednecks?” And his idea that America is so big there is no threat of being demographically swamped and no chance of a civil war (a second one, he means)?

So, according to Faye, at the beginning of the 21st century, the USA was a vast and open country with so much room that there is no problem of demographic swamping or civil war, populated by Anglo-Saxon cowboy-rednecks, who are adversaries of Europe. At the exact same time, American Nutzis were telling us that the USA was over-populated, being overwhelmed by the Colored Third World immigration invasion, ruled by Jews who dispossessed the Anglo-Saxon founding stock and who are engaging in genocidal race replacement, and that America will collapse in five-to-ten years in the throes of a race war. Interestingly, later on in his book, Faye discussed the dire demographic problems that America faces, with a growing Colored, and a declining White, population percentage. But I thought that America is so vast that such considerations don’t really matter?  Well then, being in the “movement” means never worrying about consistency, right?

Der Right, Der Right, Der Right marches on.

Europeans accuse Americans of knowing nothing about Europe; the opposite is typically more often the case. At least Americans make an attempt at understanding the European situation, while Europeans are content to indulge in comical stereotypical fantasies about American reality. The American problem with Europe is more prescriptive than descriptive – American activists make suggestions that the Europeans reject and then the Europeans state that Americans make these suggestions because they don’t know anything about Europe. In contrast, the European problem with America is both prescriptive and descriptive. They know nothing about today’s America, so their description is comical and their prescription for America, based on this ludicrous description, is absurd.

Then there’s this – Faye states he’s writing the book in 2002 and that he’s “betting” than there will be an open “civil war” within France within “ten years.”  Thus, he later states that the “great about-turn” will start in about 2010. Well, it’s 2021 and we are still waiting.  Later in the book he makes predictions about the world of 2030 – and he considers that by that time everything will be changed.  Now, it’s theoretically possible that the next nine years may see the radical changes Faye envisioned for 2030, but would you bet on it?  I wouldn’t. All these Der Tag types in the “movement” – in Europe as well as America apparently – make fools of themselves and delegitimize their message to third party observers by making such predictions. Why people on the Right don’t have enough sense to avoid doing this is baffling. We also see the asinine prediction that Israel will be finished by 2020.  Not quite.  All these types underestimate the stability of the System – both nationally and internationally, while at the same time paradoxically, the System overestimates its own stability. The truth lies somewhere in between those two extremes. Collapse is likely inevitable, but it may take a very, very, very long time, indeed.

When Faye scornfully (and in my opinion justifiably) writes in condemnation of treasonous collaborationists on the identitarian Right, and labels these as promoting “ethnopluralistsm,” he no doubt had de Benoist in mind. Ethnopluralism, in actual practice, is fatalistic surrender.

The best chapter of the book is Resisters or Histrions, where Faye fires well-deserved salvos at the inept and defeatist Right, its weakness and incompetence compared to the ever-victorious Left, and, in addition to once again mocking the “ethnopluralists” and those obsessed with “metapolitics” instead of real political action, Faye also chides those European activists who have obsessed over American “race-based IQ comparisons” (and he later mocks “IQ obsessed scholars”) - what did Faye think then of the Amren conferences he unfortunately attended?  Faye's criticisms are akin to the sort of material one could read at EGI Notes. Perhaps the Quota Queens would label Faye as “insane” and a “paranoid piece of crap.” 

The subsequent chapter, Operetta Rebels, is also good, were Faye makes some useful distinctions between rebels and revolutionaries, with Faye clearly preferring the latter (disciplined and intolerant creators who wish to replace the current system with their own regime) to the former (semi-anarchic and overly tolerant complainers who abstractly criticize and mythologize the past, but who have no wish to fight for a different future). 

One can only be amused when Faye talks rightfully complains about a “hatred of simplicity” and “slaves of subtlety” – the images invoked are of some of the pompous “intellectuals” of the Far Right, with their “metapolitics” and verbose analyses that take 5000 words to say what could be summed up in a single brief paragraph. Perhaps they mimic their hero Heidegger, who required entire chapters to present a thought that could have been more succinctly expressed in a single sentence. And Faye indeed mocks Heidegger for that “great philosopher’s” meaningless ramblings about “Being” (so beloved by the pseudo-intellectual Majority Rights and Counter-Currents crowds). These are the same types who would decry the “simplicity” and “lack of subtlety” of EGI Notes. God forbid we present opinions and advice in easy-to-understand, clear, and direct prose!  No, every post must be a pseudo-erudite mini-PhD thesis into the origins of esoteric traditionalism - thoughtful reading for when you are snug in your hobbit hole!  Faye rightfully mocks the emphasis, including that on the Right, on empty, abstract theorizing over hardcore pragmatism, will to power, and action. Throughout the book, Faye emphasizes the importance of action, of winning, of victory, of power, over theorizing, hyper-intellectualism, and pathological altruism (and his deconstruction of Christianity in this regard is to the point). Sometimes this serves him well, and his comments on a just vengeance, realization of the motivations of the Colored World against the West (envy and a thirst for revenge and domination), and the association between outward physical appearance and inner moral essence are all good, as are his critiques on those who have attempted to rob Nietzsche’s philosophy of its aggressive will to power.  On the other hand, his Yockeyian confusion about science (“bad” and “useless”) and technics (“good” and “useful”) is rather stupid, and his disavowal of objective truth rings of leftist "deconstruction."

Faye does do a good job of outlining the counter-selective effects of war, and how the European wars of history, particularly WWI (thanks, ethnonationalism!), depleted France and other European nations of virile, manly stock, leaving behind weaklings whose defects are manifested in modern European behavior. However, given his hopes for his Euro-Siberian "archaeofuturist" grand future, I assume he still held out hopes that remaining Europeans were sufficient for reaching that goal, afterwards allowing for a replenishment of higher stocks.

The apocalyptic fantasies engaged in by Faye in his appendices leaves one with the image of a sweaty Faye being a bit too enthusiastic in penning these passages, perhaps characterized by an intractable priapism. And at the technical level, some of his speculations are wanting; for example, the nuclear scenario of appendix two, with its crude, home-made, 540 kiloton bombs made from uranium scavenged from Russian missile warheads and nuclear reactors. Nuclear reactor uranium is not weapons grade. As regards the Russian warheads, the directly fissionable material in the primary is most likely plutonium, with uranium being used for tampers and for boosting the yield of the secondary, and that would be U238 (that would undergo fission only from the high energy neutrons coming from the secondary’s fusion), not U235. Even if there was U235 in the Russian warheads, it wouldn’t be enough for multiple 540 kiloton fusion bombs (unless one got ahold of a large number of such warheads). The largest non-boosted fission bomb ever tested was America’s 540 kiloton (where Faye likely got that number from) Ivy King, and was an unsafe design requiring chains to prevent pre-detonation, and used 60 kg of highly enriched uranium (Faye talks about a total of 75 kilos of uranium - purity unspecified - for multiple bombs). If the weapons were to be boosted, this is another story (The UK’s Orange Herald was 720 kilotons boosted; hence, boosted weapons could reach 540 kilotons with less uranium being used, but it would still have to be enriched U235), but that’s not the crude bombs Faye talks about. I would think that any “crude atom bombs” built would be of much lower yield, perhaps in the Little Boy range (~ 15 kilotons), or less.

As an aside, one wonders. Is Faye’s negative commentary about homosexuality (which one can find in Prelude to War; as one example, he refers to the idea of homosexual couples as “the worst kind of psychopathy) one reason why some of our metapolitical intellectuals seem to prefer the ethnopluralist work of de Benoist?

This is an interesting discussion of Faye and his work. Obviously, I don’t agree with everything said, and there is indeed disagreement among the participants, but it is thought-provoking. Compare that to moronic Beavis-and-Butthead Alt Right podcasts, or the insipid, self-indulgent livestreams of Counter-Currents.

In summary, Prelude to War is useful, but does leave much to be desired.

Thoughts on Saint Babbitt's Day

1/6/21.

Contrary to yellow supremacist cuckservative "race realists" who label the Whites who stormed the US Capitol as "wild yahoos" and "absolutely idiotic" (after all, those red state "yahoos" are not as "cultured" as high-IQ Jews and Chinamen, eh?), I see them as heroic and patriotic White Americans; further, the Sallis Groupuscule mourns the death of Ashli Babbitt, who was, in the opinion of many reasonable observers, murdered by a cowardly member of the System's police forces.

Yes, I did not like the optics of the crowd - they were, for the most part, Alt Liters, paleos, and MAGAtards, akin to Type I "twigs and branches" "movement" "activists." Note I say akin - not the same, those were not "us" - they were NOT WNs or other Far Righters (in any real sense). It would seem that Der Movement, surprisingly, had the good sense not to be involved in this (although no doubt some will try and blame them anyway). 

But, you know, the people there were the people there, the people in the arena are the ones viewed by the audience, so while criticism about optics has objective utility, from a subjective sense, it are the people who act who determine what the descriptive optics are (even though, prescriptively, armchair critics [like Sallis, eh?)] may wish otherwise).

One day, perhaps, people on the Far Right will be judged on whether they took a conservative perspective on 1/6/21 (as do the yellow supremacists) or a radical perspective (as does the Sallis Groupuscule and, to give credit where credit is due, the Counter-Currents crowd).

Further, regardless of what the System does and what the cuckservatives cry about, there are some things that there is no going back from, certain events that are a line in the sand, so to speak, and what I call Saint Babbitt's Day is one of them. That's a dividing line between there being a remote chance of even a partial conservative MAGA and the reality of a dead America in which Whites need to find some way to survive - survive and prosper.  

And I'm sure that the Russians, the Chinese, and others are paying close attention - that a motley band of Alt Liters, paleos, and MAGAtards were able to storm the Capitol and make Senators and Congressmen scurry for cover. Could a single Spetsnaz battalion take over Washington DC in its entirety?  Food for thought in the Kremlin?  Diverse and vibrant America goes from strength to strength, eh?

As regards Trump, you can't say you weren't warned about him here. I noted that his only benefit was to spread spread chaos and balkanization (and I was certainly right about that!), but that the man himself was and is a vulgar cuck fraud.

He incites his followers, inflames the opposition, Babbitt is killed, and then he denounces his own followers and concedes the election. Hey, Fat Donny, if you had conceded two days earlier, Babbitt would still be alive. I'm not saying that Trump should have conceded at all, but if he was going to do so, then do it before the mob behavior you now cravenly denounce, not after.  

Indeed, if Trump had followed my advice and set up a "government-in-exile" scenario, not conceded but NOT promoted the 1/6/21 rally, then he would have no need to concede and slink off in disgrace, having disgusted many of his followers while at the same time not in any way satisfying the braying leftist mob. And Babbitt would still be alive. In a very real sense, Antifa Don Trump has her blood on his (short-fingered) hands. If Trump has any sort of political career at this point, shame on the Right. If Pence and the other GOP ultra-cucks have any political careers within the Republican party (they could always become Democrats, I suppose), then shame on the Republican voters and on the Right in general.

What's done is done. Saint Babbit's Day took place, and it is up to rightist White Americans to make sure her sacrifice was not in vain.

This is a useful comment, and hits the mark in many ways.  My full and unfettered opinions on this all I'm keeping to myself, as the Sallis Groupuscule has other objectives than for me just to vent, but. let's say I find that comment very congenial.

Other news:

Mafia Democracy.

Note this site.

Leftist Chutzpah, re: Portland

Hypocrisy. 

Behold the Left:

Our goal is to create a safe and engaging place for users to connect over interests and passions. In order to improve our community experience, we are temporarily suspending article commenting.

That’s The Huffington Post.  Improve experience by suspending commenting.  Gee, I guess they’re losing the debate, so…

Sort of like Greg Johnson “banning” people and refusing to debate them.

Anyway, what the Left is whining about this time - and what they don't want comments about because those comments would expose leftist hypocrisy - is that, according to the Left, the "Proud Boys" and other rightist groups are being allowed to "be violent with impunity" in Portland; the police are standing back and doing nothing.

Now, the chutzpah there is incredible.  For weeks, the Left has been running wild in America with near-impunity, particularly in Portland and Seattle - rioting, vandalism, attempted murder, assault and battery, lasers shined in eyes, anti-White racial harassment, wielding weapons, repeated race-based violations of federal fair housing laws to try and force Whites out of "gentrified" previously-Black neighborhoods, attacks against police, hate crimes against Whites, blocking traffic, and open treasonous insurrection against the US government with their violence-ridden "autonomous zone."  All of that with near impunity.  For the last four years of the administration of Antifa Don Trump, there has been anarcho-tyranny - the radical Left has been allowed to run wild with impunity, and when rightists, including Antifa Don's own deluded supporters, fight back, it are they, and they alone, who are arrested, prosecuted, and persecuted.  But, now, briefly, in Portland, we have a single moment of pure anarchy instead of anarcho-tyranny - BOTH sides are being allowed, more or less, to do what they want.  Very well.  And the outcome is such as that anyone could predict - in a fair and open battle, without anarcho-tyranny intervention, the Right comes out on top.  This proves, once and for all, that Antifa is, and always has been, part of the System, a branch of local, state, and federal government, street fighters for global capitalism, etc. They have achieved everything because they are protected by the System that they are a part of.  But, given a specific situation (Portland police losing their patience because they have been abandoned by the same System they and Antifa both serve) in which official protection is briefly withdrawn from the Left, and we see that they start whining in The Huffington Post how they are being "victimized" and "not protected by the police"- the same police they want to defund (as there is competition between the two branches of the System - why have both doing the same job?).

The lesson here is what people on the Right have been saying all along - the real problem is anarcho-tyranny, not anarchy.  If there was anarchy, then the Right could fill in the niche space left by the absence of state authority and institute their own law and order; however, the current System of anarcho-tyranny is an alliance between the System and the Left - however an alliance that is sometimes unstable when factions of the System see their own interests threatened by the leftist violence they encourage.

The carnivore diet.

I often mock Der Movement as a modern form of Ostara. And, as always, the other shoe drops.  The only thing worse than a Type I is a homosexual Type I.  Puts new meaning in the term “fetishist” eh?

A Western about moralpathy.

Gore Vidal in Julian (sort of paraphrasing Machiavelli):

One curious aspect of human society is that preventive measures are seldom taken to avert disaster, even web the exact nature of the approaching calamity is perfectly plain.

One can consider all sorts of easily foreseen "movement" disasters with respect to that quote.

An observation - True enough, the USSR was repressive throughout its entire existence, but there is this interesting dichotomy: It was when the USSR was led by non-Slavs (Jews, Georgians, mongrels like Lenin, etc.) that there was the mass murder of millions of Russian and Ukrainian Slavs, but after the Slavs took the reigns of power after the death of Stalin, the mass murder stopped (although of course repression remained). I suppose that this dichotomy is purely a coincidence - right? 

A Failed Nation and a Failed Movement

Terminal decline.

America is a failed nation state.  A nation with a third world infrastructure, with potholes like moon craters, rusting bridges, crumbling cities; a nation that uses nuclear weapons technology from the 1960s and 1970s while its Idiocracy President gibbers about “super-duper” missiles; a nation that has to use private companies, or beg Russia, in order to launch into space; a nation that can send troops overseas but cannot control its own borders; a nation that has its citizens having to use home-made or improvised face masks during a pandemic because there are no supplies; a nation that cannot perform covd-19 testing properly; a nation of waddling drug-addicted fatsos who blather, in their opioid- and Adderall-induced haze, about “poisonous vaccines” “jabbing” them with toxins and microchips; a nation that has lost control over its own territory to violent mobs of criminals, far left extremists, and subhumans, enforcing mob justice uncaring of newly discovered facts; a nation whose upcoming Presidential election is currently scheduled to feature a morbidly obese blustering retard vs. a mummified perverted dementia patient, each trying to outdo the other in being anti-White and pro-Black.

The buffoonish fraud Trump has had four years to declare Antifa a terrorist organization and use the power of the federal government against them.  Instead, his DOJ persecuted his own supporters. Now that the chickens have come home to roost, what makes you think he’ll do anything except blustering tweets?

What happened to the sincere man of genuine greatness?

Hmmm…you see, Rich, the difference here is that someone was calling Trump a vulgar ignorant buffoon and a fraud back in 2016, before the election.

Who was it?  Not the folks calling Trump a “God Emperor” or who were raising toasts for him after the election.

Trump, the hero of “criminal justice reform” and ASAP Rocky and the Jack Johnson pardon, was correctly labelled a “Negrophilic race cuck” here four years ago. Now all of the “Trump is the last chance for White America” In Trump We Trust Quota Kings and Queens are shocked – shocked they say! – that their “God Emperor” sits on his hands and blusters incoherently while American cities (such as they are) burn.

Der Movement is a failed as America is.

An appeal. By the way, Skandinavisk Frihet is apparently “out of business” – such is the way in Der Movement, Gresham’s law of Activism.

Definition: A White nationalist is someone whose primary identity, primary allegiance, primary sense of peoplehood, and primary focus of organizing is centered on their race, not on their ethnicity or nation of citizenship or religion or anything else.  Further, they promote this ideal to Whites in general – Our Race Is Our Nation.

A century ago, Nordicists were asserting:

The Mongol is not inferior to the Nordic in intelligence, as is the Negro, but represents such a divergent type that the mixture between Nordics and Chinese or Japanese is not a good one. The overflow of these Asiatics into our Pacific Coast might have Mongolized the States there had not the American laboring man taken alarm and secured legislation forbidding their immigration…We see the Nordics again confronted across the Pacific by their immemorial rivals, the Mongols. This will be the final arena of the struggle between these two major divisions of man for world dominance...

Today, Nordicists embrace HBD, which has as its objective the subservience of Nordics to their Mongol (and Jewish) overlords, and the submergence of Nordics into a Jeurasian mongrel class through admixture with Asians and Jews.  I doubt that their hero Grant would have approved.

We are not surprised (emphasis added):

Do men value physical attractiveness in a mate more than women? Scientists in numerous disciplines believe that they do, but recent research using speed-dating paradigms suggests that males and females are equally influenced by physical attractiveness when choosing potential mates. Nevertheless, the premise of the current work is that sex differences in the importance of physical attractiveness are most likely to emerge in research on long-term relationships. Accordingly, the current work drew from four independent, longitudinal studies to examine sex differences in the implications of partner physical attractiveness for trajectories of marital satisfaction. In all four studies, both partners’ physical attractiveness was objectively rated at baseline and both partners reported their marital satisfaction up to eight times over the first four years of marriage. Whereas husbands were more satisfied at the beginning of the marriage and remained more satisfied over the next four years to the extent that they had an attractive wife, wives were no more or less satisfied initially or over the next four years to the extent that they had an attractive husband. Most importantly, a direct test indicated that partner physical attractiveness played a larger role in predicting husbands’ satisfaction than predicting wives’ satisfaction. These findings strengthen support for the idea that gender differences in self-reported preferences for physical attractiveness do have implications for long-term relationship outcomes.

Also see this.

And this.

And this.

So, yes, the statin-addicted, anti-vaxxer land whales are not attractive, and, yes, for those ditzy airheads who are, currently, reasonably physically passable, the inexorable ravages of time will make them invisible to men once “the yeast hits the fan.” The collision with "the wall" is coming, milady, and there is nothing you can do to avoid it.

Do you believe that your beloved “movement” is any different?

Don’t the HBDers you support essentially want the same thing?

The World of Color sticks together, doesn’t it?  Cue more nonsense about “Aryan Persians.”  Where’s Jorjani when you need him?

ET phone home. Profiting from the suffering their alien ethny created.

See this.

The mudslinging is likely to impact Counter-Currents more severely, in part due to the rampant homophobia of the white nationalist movement. Not least, it is likely to cause the outlet to haemorrhage donations at a time of financial need (the row comes on the back of many of Counter-Currents’ titles being removed off Amazon), and could also see the departure of Polignano, following Friberg’s leaking of the purported messages.

Correct about Polignano, but wrong about everything else. The Left, with all of its resources, is good at infiltration, but poor at analysis.  They accumulate data, but cannot effectively interpret it. The Far Right is in fact today primarily made up of cults of personality, centered on various gurus and elder statesmen and Internet personalities and “rock stars.” While there are some ideological differences, the vast majority of Der Movement is composed of Type I Nutzi fetishists, so the major divisions therein are that of the personality cults. 

You may argue – hasn’t that always been the case with the Far Right, historically?  The difference is that when there is an authentic ideology underpinning the personality, the movement can survive, in some form, even after the demise of the leader.  Mussolini and Hitler are dead, but Fascism and its National Socialist variant, are still with us today.  The Legionary Movement survived Codreanu’s death. Yockey is dead, but his ideas still cast an influence today, at least upon the Type II minority.

On the other hand, after Pierce died, the National Alliance collapsed.  The group was a Neo-Nazi personality cult centered on Pierce. There was nothing novel there, no deep ideological core other than warmed over Nazism and Nordicism. Without Pierce, there is only a zombified corpse of an organization, resistant to revival.  The Spencer faction of the Alt Right collapsed after Spencer’s implosion as a viable leader.  The Alt Right was merely the same tired Piercian dogma freshened up with Millennial juvenile jackassery and with younger “leaders.”  Sans Spencer, the Spencerian faction had/has no core ideology to keep it afloat. That leaves Johnson by default, the others being too old or uninterested in leadership to constitute a challenge.  Johnson’s core of supporters are undeterred by the Pilleater and Polignano scandals or by the Hermansson and Lewis infiltrations.  There also isn’t really anywhere else for them to go. I have to give credit to where it is due; Johnson is very resilient.  He’s a survivor, like it or not.  All of the people who predicted his demise as a leader (note that EGI Notes never did), like Forney or the Left, have been wrong. Relatively minor scandals, embarrassing infiltrations, chronically bad judgment, and economic woes cannot sink a personality cult centered on a cunning and politically savvy leader.  “Rampant homophobia” will not sink Counter-Currents because “rampant homophobes” were never supporters to begin with. Such people would have been driven away by James O’Meara and Buttercup Dew long before The Pilleater Chronicles.  Johnson is able to dig up sources of donations (at least for now), so Counter-Currents is surviving in that respect. Losing Polignano a second time means nothing since Counter-Currents did fine after the first time, and, after all, what does Der Movement care about someone surnamed “Polignano" anyway? As long as Johnson is around in Der Movement, and in the absence of a real serious scandal and/or the emergence of a viable competitor, Counter-Currents will be around assuming that Der Movement itself is still around.  Again, the Left’s ability to analyze the Right is chronically flawed.  If the Right were in any way competent, they would take advantage of that; but since they are not, they won’t.

Ethnonationalism brings failure after failure.  Exhibit A is Brexit, where anger at “Polish plumbers” has led to an increase in non-White immigration into Britain and genocidal plans such as this.  So, according to Johnson the heroes of Intermarium should be getting ready to wage war against Britain and “ethnically cleanse” it, right?

Odds and Ends, 3/23/20

In der news.

As an example of the remarkable differences that exist within the Far Right, EGI Notes was telling readers to start prepping for possible coronavirus disruptions and lockdowns back in February; meanwhile, even today, you still have Der Movement retards telling you that the virus is a “hoax" and that any sort of prepping is “alarmist madness.” Judge for yourself who is right and who is wrong.

Similarly, this blog has been banging the drum about the Chinese and about other Asians for years, warning you about them, while even today the HBDers are still literally worshipping the Chinese.  Right? Wrong?

We’ll also see who is right and wrong about ethnoracial virus susceptibility.  Give it time. Stay tuned.

Vibrant diversity will make the crisis worse.  More here.  Di,di,di...verisiteeee....

Zturd, who is in my opinion clearly mentally ill, continues to use the “garden gnome giraffe” stupidity in recent posts, despite its obvious absurdity, which was pointed out here recently. The man’s deranged. That such a nutcase is a prominent voice in the “movement” very precisely demonstrates how intellectually and morally bankrupt that ”movement” truly is.

This is HBD.  “Ambivalence” in everything except Asia worship.

I supported the civil rights movement as a child, a teenager, and a young adult.

Uh huh. Now, imagine someone that could have been that wrong about something.  Can you trust their judgment now?  Absolutely wrong about the Negro, but you should trust him about the Mongolid or the Levantine?

Say no to HBD.

Der Movement marches on.  Stupidity is as stupidity does. Why is the Right always an embarrassment?  Moronic empty talk – and on “an encrypting messaging app”- as if the same government that can break codes of foreign governments and listen in to whenever Merkel farts is not going to know what retarded Nutzis are gibbering about.

Instead of electoral politics and organizing in the White community to help people – how about helping White folks in this time of need by grocery shopping for old folks or mowing their lawns or doing something socially useful? – they instead talk about "saliva on doorknobs."

As I predicted – Der Movement will utterly discredit itself in this crisis.

Sallis is always right.  Behold - what a moron.  Holding China accountable does not mean Bolton-like military action (unfortunately, as it would be great to blanket that country with neutron bombs).

What is realistic is to over time turn China into a pariah nation.  We need to move – and yes I know it will take time – as much as our manufacturing away from China as possible. Preferably in the USA, but if not here, at least in a civilized nation populated by human beings, not monsters. We can stop the China worship in all corners of America – media, politics, Der Movement, academia.  We can stop importing large numbers of Chinese.  We can stop populating our entire STEM apparatus with lying, cheating, spying, stealing Chinese. We can, and should, eventually switch diplomatic recognition from the PRC to Taiwan – although, realistically that will have to wait until we entangle ourselves from the PRC in the ways outlined above. The world should indict Chinese leadership in international court, so that if any of those frog faces step foot outside The Land of the Gods, they'll risk arrest.  And that’s just a start.

Do I think any of this will actually happen? No. But don’t pretend there isn’t a wide range of options in between (a) bombing China and (b) doing nothing and continuing to worship China and the Chinese “people.”

At this point, The Master of Disaster is useful only for comic relief.

Greg Johnson:

#Coronavirus will devastate higher ed in America, now that online courses are standard. Why pay big bucks for information you can get online for free? Also, the economic downturn and uncertainty mean that fall enrollments will be way down. That's a good thing.

There’s some truth to that. There is also truth in the Sallisian rephrasing of that:

#Coronavirus will devastate “movement” grifters in America, now that online content from people who do not rattle the tin cup is standard. Why pay big bucks to support expensive blue state grifter lifestyles while others produce content online for free? Also, the economic downturn and uncertainty mean that “movement” D’Nations will be way down. That's a good thing.

Getting back to Johnson, it depends - if people want to get a degree ("credentialism!"), then the online courses will be from "higher ed."  If all you want is the information then, sure, it's free online.  

Der Movement apparently will now be the standard bearer against "credentialism" - as part of the Right's long-standing animus toward rationality, empiricism, materialism, science, expertise, etc.- without realizing that this paradigm can backfire against the grifters. For example, why pay for Brimelow's robust compensation for being a blog editor while others produce content for free?  Why subsidize the "credentialism" of "movement leaders" like Brimelow when others of "lesser status" in the "movement" actually contribute more to said "movement?"  Why accept the "credentialism" of leading HBDers when what they preach is factually untrue pseudoscience, as opposed to other online commentators who actually deal in reality?

Further, on a related note, Tucker Carlson is a bit naive if he thinks switching "higher ed" online is going to get rid of all of the diversity parasites. What stops them from offering their flotsam and jetsam online as well?  If you need a degree, and if your online "higher ed" degree grantor requires online "diversity training," then that's what you are going to get. These conservatives always underestimate the inherent stability of the multicultural System to surface changes (e.g., style of content delivery). Salter's strategy of "democratic multiculturalism" would instead be a real challenge to the System, since it involves affecting content, not merely the style of content delivery.  

Milady contributes to coronavirus awareness.  Everyone does what is possible within their areas of expertise and their set of capabilities!

Nardella needs to be indicted for both treason and for mass murder.

Dishonest pro-Chinese shills.  It is a STRAWMAN ARGUMENT that “originating from a laboratory” means the same as "the virus is man-made and bioengineered.” The Chinese could have been studying the wild-type virus and it could have escaped from the biolab there, either by an infected lab worker, escaped lab animals, or selling infected lab animals to wet markets, which Chinese “scientists” have already been convicted of doing.

By the way, how about “fact-checking” Chinese-HBD claims that the virus was am “American bioweapon?”

Then we have new stories "analyzing" why the situation in Italy is so bad, without ever mentioning the large Chinese population in Northern Italy, which, by some mysterious coincidence, just so happens to be the epicenter of the crisis there. Commentators to those new stories speak the truth, to be answered by Chinese scum (redundant description?) making asinine arguments like "there's also a lot of Chinese in Canada, how come it is not so bad there?"

OK, I'll bite. Putting aside that we don't know yet how bad things are going to get in Canada, and putting aside the Italian "government's" slower response, we can compare the two sets of Chinese populations.  In Canada, most Chinese are (unfortunately) citizens of Canada or at least (legal) permanent residents, they are typically reasonably well-off if not rich, and live with their families in fully integrated Chinese invader communities, with little need to continuously move back and forth between Canada and China.

On the other hand, the Chinese of the large Chinese community concentrated in Northern Italy are mostly Chinese nationals, some of whom are illegal, some of whom are there without their families, many of whom are poor manual laborers, without the more integrated long-established communities found in Canada, and thus are "people" frequently traveling between China and Italy.  Understand?

This doesn't even get into the Chinese tourist problem or the "hug an Asian" campaign that existed in Italy.  Comparisons between Canada and Italy are therefore inappropriate.

By the way, to better understand my contempt for the Italians, consider the following.  The Italians killed and butchered both Rienzi and Mussolini for the "crime" of trying to raise Italians to the level of national greatness. On the other hand, the effete milksop Nardella, who can reasonably be seen as contributing to the current horrors unfolding in Italy, won't even be arrested and prosecuted.  Instead, we get "singing on balconies."  Italians can't expect others to consider them a serious people, can they?

A very libertarian virus.

Odds and Ends, 12/4/19

Various issues.

Greg Johnson describes how he attacks those on the Right:

principled intellectual disagreement vs. personal invective (It is not “divisive” to sincerely disagree with someone.)

defending oneself from attacks vs. launching attacks on others

calling out people for harming the movement vs. pointless personal vendettas

The problem is that this is exactly what Ted Sallis does, but when Ted does it, he’s “crazy and bitter” and to be “banned.”

Type Is on the march.

Zaremski was an emergency medical technician who frequented white supremacist forums online and had a trove of neo-Nazi literature. He was caught only because he sent a photo of his ex-girlfriend wearing parts of a Nazi uniform to her employer, officials said…He also affixed a “Right Wing Death Squad” patch to his EMT jacket.

Der Movement, Der Movement, Der Movement marches on.

Look at this naïve buffoon presenting ancestry testing results to the decimal point for Gabbard, including percentages of 3.8, 1.1, and 0.8.  Depending on the test and the parental populations used, I would question even the percentages in the 20s.

Let it not be said that the “movement’s” affirmative action “leadership” does not come up with brilliant ideas – this is one!  Heil Der Movement!  Heil!  

No, actually the Alt Right should just continue on the glorious path already established.

Andrew Fraser wanna-be and "Wilmot" lover Morris the Liar is back again with the same old shtick. Question – wasn’t it the grand old WASP foreign policy establishment that gave us American involvement in WWI and WWII (and don’t start braying about “Pearl Harbor” with respect to the latter, with all the grand work Der Movement has done over the years uncovering the FDR administration’s perfidy regarding that)?

Oh you’ll say – the Jews were manipulating there.  If that is the case, as far back as WWI, then when did the USA have an authentically Humphrey Irelandish foreign policy apparatus?  The Spanish American War perhaps, brought to us by grand fellows like Hearst (journalism leading foreign policy) and the reason we have so many Puerto Ricans and Filipinos in American today.  What?  Do we gave to go back to Polk and the Mexican American War?  Or perhaps Jefferson and the Louisiana Purchase?  Or Washington’s Farewell Address?

Der Movement likes to pontificate, but cannot back up all of the hot air with historical reality.

If you believe that in the past that American foreign policy was run by the “Majority,” then this is relevant.  Fiction mirroring reality. After all, if Der Movement loves the Pesci scene so much, they can also consider the content of the remainder of the movie as well.

Now, I did state:

A case can be made that folks like the Wilsons founded and built America and so they have the right to pull the strings…

Very well.  But if so, at least have the honesty to admit when the Wilsons screw things up, instead of pretending those were halcyon days – the Golden Age of foreign affairs from which we’ve sadly fallen to the Yogi Bear (“Kali Yuga”). But then, the concept of accountability is not very well accepted by Der Movement and its “leadership,” is it?

My response to this nonsense is this EGI Notes post.  Fact is, Rushton was exposed as a fraud and a personal hypocrite by a fellow HBDer.  That Johnson blithely ignores the facts about his hero and continues to peddle him as some sort of admirable figure is unfortunate but not (to me) surprising.

Comments on the Clarke Interview

Three points.

Read this.  

As a final note, the story of these arrests, and of Andrew’s in particular, is an important corrective and admonition to those among us who have waxed eloquently with their “disavowals” of “terrorism” because it “undermines White Nationalism.” I have always had a problem with such disavowals, and for a few simple reasons. More often than not, they are simply exercises in preaching to the converted. Most disavowals are made by people “plugged into” the “movement”, while the very rare handful of extreme acts of White violence are carried out by isolated fringe individuals who never hear such disavowals or are least likely to be moved by them. Disavowals are thus, more or less, languid and effete acts of moral self-satisfaction. Second, disavowals simply add to, and increase the volume of, discourse critiquing the dissident Right, and they are divisive and demoralising. They implicitly assume a problem within the “movement” that needs to be addressed (where none in fact exists because the movement is already overwhelmingly non-violent), a pernicious trend that conforms very strongly to opposition narratives. They are, therefore, in terms of image management or “optics” undoubtedly worse than mere silence – we can’t correct criticism and image problems by making concessions to the opposition’s vision of our cause. Third, and related to the second, “right wing terrorism” is a largely invented phenomenon, embellished by falsified statistics, media tactics, and the steady production of propaganda by dedicated anti-White groups. It is a largely fictional opposition talking point that would be foolish to adopt ourselves. Fourth, and most important, by adopting discussions and perceptions of “right wing terrorism” we are easily corralled into fear and silence when entirely innocent activists are swept up in “terrorism” arrests. We allow ourselves to be pre-programmed to disavow these individuals and abandon them to their fate. I personally find this mode of conduct to be shameful, cowardly, and highly revealing. I reject it in disgust.

This is a fascinating paragraph because when looking at it from the perspective of a point-by-point analysis, I agree with all points (more or less) and have no strong objection to anything written.  However, looking at it as a whole, I cannot fully agree with it – it is as if the whole is less than the sum of the parts.  If I had to pinpoint a specific objection to the entire narrative of that paragraph, it would focus on that I believe something needs to be said about the issue of these violent attacks by pro-White individuals and what the deeper meaning of them is.  I agree with Joyce that the disavowals are not helpful and sometimes harmful, and I am myself tired of those “movement leaders” who trot out the same tired essay over and over again when an incident occurs. However, there is a difference between such disavowals and an honest appraisal of the problem. By take on these incidents has been two-fold. First, I criticize the System for causing the problem to begin with, with its anti-White policies, its persecution of pro-White activists, and its cordone sanitaire erected to inhibit pro-White activists from fully participating in the political process, equal to all others. Second, I criticize Der Movement because its constant humiliating failures and depressing ineptness induces despair in pro-White individuals and prompts some of them to carry out foolish attacks. If the “movement” was a credible outlet for racialist feelings and activism, then perhaps these people would not believe that their only option is to shoot something up. So, point-by-point, Joyce’s critique of the disavowals is fine, but the entire paragraph fails in that it doesn’t address what should be done, what should be critiqued, and doesn’t properly point the finger at “movement” failure as one motivator for the attacks.

However, by 2017 HnH had a mole inside a group of friends who used to be members of pre-ban National Action. Robbie Mullen was this mole, and Mullen used to be the regional organiser for what was National Action in the North West. The evidence shows that Mullen was playing people off one another as late as July 2017. His efforts were not working and he himself described the group of friends, supposedly a clandestine continuation of National Action, as like “an old man’s drinking club” with “not much going for it.”

At the end of April 2017, Mullen approached Hope Not Hate via email, alleging that NA continued to exist and that he was a current member. He said in court that it (“NA”) had discarded all of the symbolism of NA and was “going it alone” as a nameless entity. HnH activist Matthew Collins has since said that they began to publish articles on their website in the hope the media would pick them up — presumably in order to generate paranoia among former members.

Former NA member Christopher Lythgoe had, post-ban, taken out a private gym for himself in Warrington and that this, according to Mullen, was supposedly “NA” headquarters. I’d like to add that Michal Trubini, who was found not-guilty with me in April 2019, was the name on the lease for the property that the gym was situated in. There wasn’t a single shred of political literature or items found in that gym when the police searched it in September 2017.

Mullen had supposedly expressed to HnH that he wanted out of NA, but that he couldn’t leave because he was too embedded within NA and feared for his safety. HnH later said through Matthew Collins that they were slowly withdrawing him from the group. However, they contradicted this statement through Collins, their “Head of Intelligence,” stating that they persuaded Mullen to remain in the group to work as an informant for HnH, and that Collins would be his “handler.”

Third, it is interesting how the Right is always so easily infiltrated and compromised by the Left, while the opposite almost never occurs. And of course, HopeNotHate was the group that used Hermansson to leverage “movement” Nordicism so as to place him in a position of extensive infiltration. Der Movement is lucky that the Left (at least in this case) was so short-sighted and unimaginative, for they could have had this Hermansson fellow rise fairly fast and far in Der Movement (more than what he actually did) and do real long-term damage. Perhaps they already have such people already in place?  After all, many of our “leading activists” couldn’t do more damage if they were trying. Maybe they are.

The dissident ethno-nationalist Right must enter the democratic process and fight tooth and nail for every vote. 

Readers of this blog know I have been promoting the idea that electoral politics are important.  Not as the only strategy and not as the main strategy, but as one crucial component of an interlocking strategic plan, that also includes metapolitical education and community/infrastructure/organization.

Recent Type I Fiasco

Type Is on the march.

Type I “movement” activism.  Emphasis added:

The white supremacist arrested last week for allegedly plotting to bomb a historic Colorado synagogue has been actively associating with other known extremists and espousing anti-Semitic and racist ideology on social media for years, according to the Anti-Defamation League. 

Youth culture! WN 2.0!

Richard Holzer, 27, was arrested on Friday night on federal hate crime charges after meeting with undercover FBI agents to pick up what federal authorities described as "inert explosive devices that had been fabricated by the FBI, including two pipe bombs and 14 sticks of dynamite."

According to the charge against him, he planned to use the devices to blow up the Temple Emanuel synagogue in Pueblo, Colo., which is on the National Register of Historic Places.

Type I in a nutshell…emphasis on the word “nut.”

At a press conference Monday, Dean Phillips, FBI Denver special agent in charge, told reporters that Holzer first came onto the FBI’s radar in late September thanks to a tip alerting it to online comments “indicating a possible threat to the community." 

An infiltrator?

But the ADL’s Center on Extremism says it has been tracking Holzer’s activities since 2016, and “has shared information with law enforcement on several occasions (unrelated with this case), citing concerns he might be dangerous.”

Great to know we have an ethnic-based private domestic Gestapo in America.

As far as the organization can determine, until last week Holzer’s extremism mostly took the form of online posts and participation in white supremacist events. His major act of anti-Semitism consisted of “urinating on a synagogue in Thousand Oaks, Calif.,” which he allegedly videotaped and posted to Facebook.

Come now!  How can dastardly Boomers hope to compete with these acts of intellectual ferment coming from the Millennials?

“He frequently posted online about killing his enemies,” reads a report published to the ADL’s website Tuesday detailing some of Holzer’s activities both online and off that raised concern in the years leading up to his arrest last week. 

But wasn’t banned?  Why is that?

According to the ADL, Holzer posted several photos and videos of himself on Facebook “wearing black military-styled fatigues adorned with a mixture of Klan and neo-Nazi pins and patches.”

Did he have swastika-soled boots?  Did he dance through cemeteries?

In June 2017, ADL researchers spotted Holzer in several images from a “March Against Sharia” rally in Denver. Photos from the event show Holzer dressed in a black “white power” shirt and marching alongside the associates of the now disbanded neo-Nazi group the Traditionalist Worker Party. 

WN 2.0 marches on!

The report published Tuesday contains photos obtained by the ADL from Holzer’s many alleged Facebook accounts, including one in which he is holding the flag of the neo-Nazi National Socialist Movement, alongside the caption: “age 17 and an NSM prospect.”

In another photo, Holzer is seen with Jacob Laskey, a prominent white supremacist who spent 11 years in prison for throwing stones engraved with swastikas through the windows of a synagogue in Eugene, Ore., during religious services in 2002. 

Millennial activism!  How can WN 1.0 compare with such contributions of high intellectual and academic attainment?  WN 2.0 scholarly activities to be sure!

It was through one of these Facebook accounts that the FBI initially made contact with Holzer, on Sept. 28, 2019, through an online covert FBI employee posing as a white woman…

And the thirsty beta male took the sexual bait.  

…sympathetic to white supremacist views. According to the affidavit, Holzer described himself as a skinhead in Facebook messages to the covert FBI employee and proceeded to send several photos of himself wearing clothing with white nationalist and Nazi symbols and carrying various weapons, including firearms, a machete and a knife. 

Is this guy the purest manifestation of Type I-ism or what?  Did he read March of the Titans as well?

He also “sent a video of himself urinating on the front door of what appears to be a Jewish center,” a scene similar to the one described by the ADL. 

Drinking all that Viking mead fills the bladder.

At a House Homeland Security Committee hearing last week, federal law enforcement and Homeland Security officials, including FBI Director Christopher Wray, described domestic terrorism, particularly racially and ethnically motivated violence committed by white supremacist extremists, as one of the most significant growing threats to national security. 

Let’s thank all the Type Is for supporting this dishonest System narrative. What we would do without all our Type I brothers?  Who knows?  Maybe make progress and win?

We can blame three entities for this fiasco:

First, Holzer himself. I was that age once, and did not do such things. There are many activists of his age today who do not fall for such obvious traps, and who do not plan, or engage in, violence.  Activists are told, constantly, NOT to engage in violence and to beware of infiltrators and agent provocateurs.  So, a large amount of the blame falls on Holzer.

Second, Der Movement is at fault – but NOT in the sense that the Left/System would claim. It is NOT that a dire international band of dangerous “White supremacists” are stirring up trouble. It’s not a dangerous “Far Right conspiracy.” It is actually the precise opposite of that.  It is precisely because Der Movement and its inept affirmative action “leadership” is such a pathetic joke, is so hopeless, that well-meaning but stupid people become frustrated, full of despair, with no confidence that progress can be made non-violently, and so they violently lash out. 

What?  What does Der Movement have to offer as hope?  “Leaders” who are retarded grifters? Folks who ask for “D’Nations” so they can repeatedly travel to Europe and be prevented from attending the meetings they were supposed to speak at?  What?  Lunatics screeching like deranged banshees, with every other word being “fuck” or “fucking?”  People who hold meetings in which the lead speaker, talking on the topic of “the dangers of infiltration,” is himself an infiltrator? That the person “helping” with the “extreme vetting” is an infiltrator who got in merely because he passed the “are you Swedish?” test?  What?  A constant litany of defeat, despair, and humiliation?  Homosexual sexual harassment at meetings? Accusations of drug use and alcoholism? What? Decade after decade of constant failure?  Endorsements of Princess Tulsi Coconut and Andy Eggroll?  Still thinking the fraud Trump is a “sincere man of genuine greatness?”  What?  HBD that worships Jews and Asians and that props up as a nicely reimbursed “movement spokesman” a man who is not only married to a Chinatrix and has mixed-race children, but who openly promotes miscegenation and who publicly asked why child porn should be illegal?  What?  Hundreds of thousands of dollars going to a shaggy-haired grinning moppet who basically does nothing but edit a website?  Oh yes, victory is nigh!

Third, the System is to blame.  By preventing the Far Right from having fair and free access to participation in the political process, by making peaceful change almost impossible, they PROMOTE the same violence they pretend they are trying to prevent. The System combined with Der Movement cuts off options to people.  The System then engages in “set-ups" constituting obvious entrapment.   Meanwhile, the border is porous and the streets of America run red with the blood spilled from Colored crime.  But let's entrap some hopeless retardate who previous offenses centered around an obsession with micturation.  Donald Trump's America!  MAGA!  Pepe!  Kek!  

And don't forget to send in those "D'Nations."  Remember, those who give live in the golden age today!  Better that than the age of Yogi Bear and The Men Who Can't Tell Time.